A few days ago I got the IPO pretending it was complying with the Freedom of Information Act and the Data Protection Act after I had reported them to the Information Commissioner for failing to give me copies of all the emails, records of telephone conversations or letters sent to the Met or the Dorset Police or the Parliamentary Ombudsman.
Initially they trickled out a few bits of paper from around 2004 which wasn't what I asked for. I complained to them and I got a few more from the time in questions but they were only copies of what I had already had,or about matters that were not what I asked for. In other words they were playing me for a fool once more, so I complained about them to the ICO.
They then with rapidity sent me a few more trickles of documents and I took them to task once more and this resulted in about a month ago, yet another exercise in duplicity. A few more documents that I already had and the documents I knew existed being ignored.
You may remember that the IPO had had emails sent between them and the Dorset Police. One I had got hold of clearly said that a guy called Hayward of the IPO was going to send an email answering questions the cop had asked him about me and my case. Obviously I needed to see this email as I can bet it contains explosive remarks which both the IPO and the Dorset pigs certainly do not want me to see. For if my intuition is right it will contain material that will incriminate both of the bastards.
So I sent this Julie woman another emails asking for this email. She sent me back an email this week saying that there are no more documents and that is that. In other words push off, that is your lot. Not answering you on the point about Haywards missing email. Of course all this is reported back to the ICO, but being yet another Government quango they will no doubt be all smoke and mirrors and will have no teeth as I have already commented on.
But what it clearly shows us is that all four bodies that have refused to give me what is my right to see only paints them black as black as they are clearly trying to hide material they know I can hang them with.....THE BASTARDS!!
Saturday 28 May 2011
Tuesday 17 May 2011
Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 57.
Got the blighters letter today and it's the usual cop out you get from all these duplicitous government departments. Even if today Britain cannot do anything right, what they excel in is evading doling out Justice to the British Public, ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY KNOW TO DO SO MAY OPEN THEM UP TO BEING SUED FOR COMPENSATION!! IF ONLY I HAD THE MONEY TO DO SO.
This letter will be shortly shown on this blog under the documents link. But what it amounts to is this;
1/ When anyone in this country is part of a Tribunal Hearing that hearing will be held by a CIVIL SERVANT and NOT AN SUPPOSED INDEPENDENT JUDGE!!
2/ Any hearing Officer because he is not Independent can ignore whatever acts of forgery or perjury you show has been committed. He can ignore the evidence you show, not even discuss it at the hearing nor bring it into his decision making. In other words it is as if it were never there or had it brought to his attention. He can do this because he knows that he will never have his actions questioned by anyone and the aggrieved person will never be afforded any avenue by which he can get justice. Even when faced by a lawyer laying out how perjury has been committed he can simply ignore him and what he says and shows. He can ignore witness affidavits and statements, again with impunity.
3/ You will be faced with the fact that the hearing officer could actually be under orders to make sure that no matter what evidence he has put to him he should find for only one of the bodies involved. In my case it is my contention that the IPO did not want me to win because they knew if I did it would give me the evidence that the IPO had acted incompetently and I was of a mind to sue them. What better motive?
3/ You will be put in a situation whereby you simply have no avenue to correct these acts which constitute a miscarriage of justice. For the very court Judge (the hearing officer)can as I say, refuse to recommend the perjurer be investigated, the Police in collusion with the IPO, can decide also not to investigate and that lays both parties open the accusation that they have deliberately acted to deny justice to the aggrieved party. The IPO and the hearing officer who is an employee of the IPO know that the aggrieved will have no avenue to correct what has happened.
IS THIS WHAT DAVID CAMERON MEANT WHEN HE SAID THAT HE WAS GOING TO MAKE BRITAIN A FAIRER COUNTRY????? DENY THE PEASANTS ANY WAY THEY CAN GET JUSTICE AGAINST HIS OWN CIVIL SERVANTS????
This letter will be shortly shown on this blog under the documents link. But what it amounts to is this;
1/ When anyone in this country is part of a Tribunal Hearing that hearing will be held by a CIVIL SERVANT and NOT AN SUPPOSED INDEPENDENT JUDGE!!
2/ Any hearing Officer because he is not Independent can ignore whatever acts of forgery or perjury you show has been committed. He can ignore the evidence you show, not even discuss it at the hearing nor bring it into his decision making. In other words it is as if it were never there or had it brought to his attention. He can do this because he knows that he will never have his actions questioned by anyone and the aggrieved person will never be afforded any avenue by which he can get justice. Even when faced by a lawyer laying out how perjury has been committed he can simply ignore him and what he says and shows. He can ignore witness affidavits and statements, again with impunity.
3/ You will be faced with the fact that the hearing officer could actually be under orders to make sure that no matter what evidence he has put to him he should find for only one of the bodies involved. In my case it is my contention that the IPO did not want me to win because they knew if I did it would give me the evidence that the IPO had acted incompetently and I was of a mind to sue them. What better motive?
3/ You will be put in a situation whereby you simply have no avenue to correct these acts which constitute a miscarriage of justice. For the very court Judge (the hearing officer)can as I say, refuse to recommend the perjurer be investigated, the Police in collusion with the IPO, can decide also not to investigate and that lays both parties open the accusation that they have deliberately acted to deny justice to the aggrieved party. The IPO and the hearing officer who is an employee of the IPO know that the aggrieved will have no avenue to correct what has happened.
IS THIS WHAT DAVID CAMERON MEANT WHEN HE SAID THAT HE WAS GOING TO MAKE BRITAIN A FAIRER COUNTRY????? DENY THE PEASANTS ANY WAY THEY CAN GET JUSTICE AGAINST HIS OWN CIVIL SERVANTS????
Wednesday 4 May 2011
Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 56.
I have long said that the IPCC are yet another bunch of useless overpaid civil servants who are only there the apologise and defend the Police. I've said it on this blog and in my book and NOW WE HAVE THE IRREFUTABLE PROOF. For in today's Times Newspaper they state in their Editorial Comments column that the killing of Ian Tomlinson by the Met Police was UNLAWFUL, as did the jury....God Bless them. If it were not for juries we the British Public would forever be treated corruptly by the Establishment and especially the Police.
Look at how the very same Met Police treated me when I gave them irrefutable proof that a conman namely Robert Busbridge committed gross and persistent acts of forgery and perjury, they refused to even investigate my allegations despite the masses of evidence I gave them. They even said I had not even given them any evidence at all. So their usual gross acts of persistent lying. They never even interviewed me despite commenting that they did not "UNDERSTAND" that evidence I gave them. What a shower!!
Then when you rightly complain to the IPCC you are then given the run round and then in the end they engage in a flurry of excuse making to paint what the Met did as whiter than white and nothing to worry about.
Now what has this got to do with the killing of Tomlinson? Very easy to explain that, as the IPCC as they do, had to "Investigate" that gross act by a member of the MET!! All of us in the country knew that this was yet another example of how out of control the Met are. They are nothing more than a bunch of thugs and crooks in uniform as are all the Police in this country. Not only thugs, but crooks in uniform, as well. The IPCC did exactly with that investigation as they did with mine. That is they backed the murderous actions of the Met up to the hilt and did not advise that the policeman should be charged and tried for it. So we all could see he needed to be brought to trial, yet the IPCC engage in yet another gross act of white washing and grovelling to the Police. WHAT A SHOWER!!
Look at how the very same Met Police treated me when I gave them irrefutable proof that a conman namely Robert Busbridge committed gross and persistent acts of forgery and perjury, they refused to even investigate my allegations despite the masses of evidence I gave them. They even said I had not even given them any evidence at all. So their usual gross acts of persistent lying. They never even interviewed me despite commenting that they did not "UNDERSTAND" that evidence I gave them. What a shower!!
Then when you rightly complain to the IPCC you are then given the run round and then in the end they engage in a flurry of excuse making to paint what the Met did as whiter than white and nothing to worry about.
Now what has this got to do with the killing of Tomlinson? Very easy to explain that, as the IPCC as they do, had to "Investigate" that gross act by a member of the MET!! All of us in the country knew that this was yet another example of how out of control the Met are. They are nothing more than a bunch of thugs and crooks in uniform as are all the Police in this country. Not only thugs, but crooks in uniform, as well. The IPCC did exactly with that investigation as they did with mine. That is they backed the murderous actions of the Met up to the hilt and did not advise that the policeman should be charged and tried for it. So we all could see he needed to be brought to trial, yet the IPCC engage in yet another gross act of white washing and grovelling to the Police. WHAT A SHOWER!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)