THE MET POLICE AGAIN.
If you have been reading all the publicity over the weekend about the Met you will know that the head of this useless and corrupt shower, Paul Stephenson has resigned. So he should and this is the ***t that ignored my letter to him about the corrupt goings on between his men at Camden and the IPO. The conniving and colluding in order to stop me from getting justice over Busbridges criminal activities.
You will remember also that both corrupt bodies refused to release to me the incriminating documents that would have proved that they were corrupt and indulging in ILLEGAL ACTIVITES by colluding together to deny me justice.
So I am heartedly glad he's gone the bastard. I hope he and that other twerp Yates, rot in hell, but then both will still get their gold plated HUGE pensions etc and will now be able to live the life of Riley, so they will not mind one bit, I am sure!
THE DICTIONARY STATES:- CORRUPT...lacking in integrity, open to or involving in bribery or other dishonest practices, putrid or rotten....CORRUPTION, the act of corrupting or state of being corrupt...dishonesty. So those of you who probably think I use this word with gay abandon, think again! I think that my constant use of this word is entirely justified, as I use it in the context of describing the goings on of ALL the government departments that I have been forced to have to go to and then have to put up with their rotten acts of corrupt practices.
Certainly the Met are the most corrupt police force in the UK and always have been. However other forces are also corrupt too, like my local force the Dorset Shower. Not many people in Dorset have much good to say about them, either and you should read my link to the website called Dorset police.Then you will see some of the goings on they get up to. Same as the Met but on a smaller scale.
Monday 18 July 2011
Wednesday 13 July 2011
Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 63.
THE CORRUPT LIARS OF THE MET AND THE USELESS CIVIL SERVANTS OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONERS OFFICE, WHO LIKE THE IPCC SEEM ONLY TO BE IN EXISTENCE TO PROTECT THE POLICE AND THE IPO. SO THEY TOO ARE CORRUPT BECAUSE IT IS OBVIOUS THAT THEY ARE DOING THIS KNOWINGLY AND DELIBERATELY. THUS PROTECTING THE POLICE AND DENYING ME JUSTICE
How many of you have watched those wretched Met Coppers on TV blagging and lying their way through the MP's questioning them. What an utter shower they all are.
Now folks this is coming from the very same mob of bastards that HAMPERED MY TRYING TO GET JUSTICE AND MY ASKING THEM TO INVESTIGATE BUSBRIDGES FORGERY AND PERJURY!! Talk about HYPOCRITES and what did they do, but hamper my efforts and in collusion with the IPO. Is it any wonder I couldn't get them to act on irrefutable evidence when they just went and colluded with another bunch of civil servants?
THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONERS OFFICE.
A few posts back I told you about how the ICO to whom I had complained about the Met and the Dorset Police, the IPO and the Parliamentary Ombudsman, all hiding from me documents that they all sent each other when I had tried to get the Met to investigate Busbridge. It really only involved TWO documents that I definitely knew existed. One the email the IPO sent Sgt Brimicombe of Dorset Police and two, the advice the IPO gave Sgt Downs at Camden Station to HELP him refuse to investigate. He admits in an email which is on this blog, that they gave him this advice.
In both cases I believe that the IPO will have disseminated to both the DPS & the Met, lies about whether forgery and perjury had been committed. I am also sure that they will have thrown in a load of derogatory remarks about me on a personal level.
This ICO mob gave me their decision re the Dorset Police a few weeks ago and how they were a bunch of whiter than white darlings who had done absolutely no wrong. I wrote about that a few posts back. Today I got their decisions about my complaints that all had refused me under the FOIAct and the DPAct and I talk now about the IPO & the Met.
The ICO have deliberately misread my complaints about both parties and in both cases they have twisted the requests I gave them in such a way as to be able to say that what I had asked for, was not able to be given to me. Yet what they say I had asked for is not what I had asked for, as I in the course of writing to both the Met & the IPO had honed my request down to those two specific documents. Originally I had asked for any documents they had that concerned me and in the case of the IPO what they had said to the Met and in the Mets case what they had said to the IPO or had received off the IPO and I specifically mentioned this one document. (the advice that the IPO gave Sgt Downs.)
In the case of the IPO I was specific about the email that they admitted they would send to the DPS. Yet what they, the ICO have done is spoken to the IPO and obviously have been fed lies by them which is what they do all the time. They try to say I did not apply under the right Act when the fcat is that I applied for the same under BOTH Acts and they say that information I had asked for could be openly seen under the Trade Marks journals which are open to the Public. This is a complete lie as what I asked for had nothing to do with any of the 8 hearings, so would never be found on any files open to the public. This is how these bastards work, by lying all the time and giving the ICO excuses so they can find for their mates in another government department. They are all shagging each other these civil servant bastards and covering up for each other.
In the case of the Met I even had to pay £10 in order to get any info off them under the DPAct. Yet when do the ICO even mention this so it's as if I am being told I did not apply under the right Act.
In both requests to the IPO & the Met I had simply asked to see both these documents which would have had in them matters to do with my request to get the Met to investigate all the forgery and perjury Busbridge had committed. All my letters about this are on this blog, so you can see for yourself what I asked for. Then the ICO deliberately complicate matters by constantly switching their remarks from one Act to the other and back again. The fact that there are TWO Acts that basically deal with matters that I think are the same. Some idiot in Parliament who thought up these Acts (in order to fool the Public that you could actually make civil servants give up incriminating documents) has I think deliberately made matters in such a way that the powers can obfuscate in all sorts of ways and tie you up in knots over what Act are you asking under? That is why I asked the same questions under BOTH Acts and they still lie through their back teeth and refuse you those documents. The whole thing is yet another sham and con on the Public.
In my case they have deliberately refused to give me those documents and the ICO have backed them up and as it is obvious the ICO have talked to the IPO it is also obvious that the IPO have given them a pack of lies. You can see how the ICO have been indoctrinated by the IPO as on the beginning of their decision document on the IPO, they state on page 2, under 'BACKGROUND', in 3 paragraphs, remarks about subject matter that I did not give the ICO. This is because they detail that I had a long running dispute involving trade marks etc etc, which they can only have got from some IPO mouthpeice. None of that is any business of the ICO and has absolutely no bearing on what I had asked to be divulged, as you will see from what I had asked to see. This proves beyond doubt that the ICO have been heavily involved in discussions about me on a personal level and with departments that I am complaining about. ONCE MORE THE IPO HAVE INDOCTRINATED ANOTHER GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT THAT I HAVE GONE TO TO GET JUSTICE.....OTHERS INCLUDE THE DPS, THE MET, THE PARLIAMENTARY OMBUDSMAN AND SO ON.IT IS ALL A SHAM AND DISGRACEFUL and they are able to get away with it, time and again. They wouldn't if I were rich!
Their remark that I have been 'involved in a long running dispute' is said by them, to make me out as a litigious person. Yet who started all the legal actions?..ROBERT BUSBRIDGE, IN 2002 WHEN HE APPLIED TO REGISTER THE MARK THAT I OWNED AND AT THE SAME TIME APPLIED TO HAVE MY TRADE MARK MADE INVALID. ENOUGH SAID????
Now that is pretty well all the actions I could take to get Justice and they have run their course. I will next week get all the latest documents onto this blog and you can read for yourself what has gone on in my latest efforts to get Justice from a number of quarters. (The Attorney General and the ICO.) I will type out explanation remarks for each document that has been lately generated.
There will also be documents from my battle to get the Attorney General to get the Police to investigate Busbridges forgery and perjury. You will be able to see what that bastard is all about too. Another useless sickening ***** filling his pockets with Public money and refusing to help those who he is supposed to serve and by a litany of excuses and outright lies. Yet another civil servant covering up for his fellow tossers. You will see how devious he and his minion McGinty has lied as laid out in my recent post. How I am told over and over how he cannot involve himself, but tucked away I am told that if I can prove by evidence I send him, then he could take steps, yet when I do exactly that all I get is a continuation of excuses. It is all there in black and white if you care to read it all.
How many of you have watched those wretched Met Coppers on TV blagging and lying their way through the MP's questioning them. What an utter shower they all are.
Now folks this is coming from the very same mob of bastards that HAMPERED MY TRYING TO GET JUSTICE AND MY ASKING THEM TO INVESTIGATE BUSBRIDGES FORGERY AND PERJURY!! Talk about HYPOCRITES and what did they do, but hamper my efforts and in collusion with the IPO. Is it any wonder I couldn't get them to act on irrefutable evidence when they just went and colluded with another bunch of civil servants?
THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONERS OFFICE.
A few posts back I told you about how the ICO to whom I had complained about the Met and the Dorset Police, the IPO and the Parliamentary Ombudsman, all hiding from me documents that they all sent each other when I had tried to get the Met to investigate Busbridge. It really only involved TWO documents that I definitely knew existed. One the email the IPO sent Sgt Brimicombe of Dorset Police and two, the advice the IPO gave Sgt Downs at Camden Station to HELP him refuse to investigate. He admits in an email which is on this blog, that they gave him this advice.
In both cases I believe that the IPO will have disseminated to both the DPS & the Met, lies about whether forgery and perjury had been committed. I am also sure that they will have thrown in a load of derogatory remarks about me on a personal level.
This ICO mob gave me their decision re the Dorset Police a few weeks ago and how they were a bunch of whiter than white darlings who had done absolutely no wrong. I wrote about that a few posts back. Today I got their decisions about my complaints that all had refused me under the FOIAct and the DPAct and I talk now about the IPO & the Met.
The ICO have deliberately misread my complaints about both parties and in both cases they have twisted the requests I gave them in such a way as to be able to say that what I had asked for, was not able to be given to me. Yet what they say I had asked for is not what I had asked for, as I in the course of writing to both the Met & the IPO had honed my request down to those two specific documents. Originally I had asked for any documents they had that concerned me and in the case of the IPO what they had said to the Met and in the Mets case what they had said to the IPO or had received off the IPO and I specifically mentioned this one document. (the advice that the IPO gave Sgt Downs.)
In the case of the IPO I was specific about the email that they admitted they would send to the DPS. Yet what they, the ICO have done is spoken to the IPO and obviously have been fed lies by them which is what they do all the time. They try to say I did not apply under the right Act when the fcat is that I applied for the same under BOTH Acts and they say that information I had asked for could be openly seen under the Trade Marks journals which are open to the Public. This is a complete lie as what I asked for had nothing to do with any of the 8 hearings, so would never be found on any files open to the public. This is how these bastards work, by lying all the time and giving the ICO excuses so they can find for their mates in another government department. They are all shagging each other these civil servant bastards and covering up for each other.
In the case of the Met I even had to pay £10 in order to get any info off them under the DPAct. Yet when do the ICO even mention this so it's as if I am being told I did not apply under the right Act.
In both requests to the IPO & the Met I had simply asked to see both these documents which would have had in them matters to do with my request to get the Met to investigate all the forgery and perjury Busbridge had committed. All my letters about this are on this blog, so you can see for yourself what I asked for. Then the ICO deliberately complicate matters by constantly switching their remarks from one Act to the other and back again. The fact that there are TWO Acts that basically deal with matters that I think are the same. Some idiot in Parliament who thought up these Acts (in order to fool the Public that you could actually make civil servants give up incriminating documents) has I think deliberately made matters in such a way that the powers can obfuscate in all sorts of ways and tie you up in knots over what Act are you asking under? That is why I asked the same questions under BOTH Acts and they still lie through their back teeth and refuse you those documents. The whole thing is yet another sham and con on the Public.
In my case they have deliberately refused to give me those documents and the ICO have backed them up and as it is obvious the ICO have talked to the IPO it is also obvious that the IPO have given them a pack of lies. You can see how the ICO have been indoctrinated by the IPO as on the beginning of their decision document on the IPO, they state on page 2, under 'BACKGROUND', in 3 paragraphs, remarks about subject matter that I did not give the ICO. This is because they detail that I had a long running dispute involving trade marks etc etc, which they can only have got from some IPO mouthpeice. None of that is any business of the ICO and has absolutely no bearing on what I had asked to be divulged, as you will see from what I had asked to see. This proves beyond doubt that the ICO have been heavily involved in discussions about me on a personal level and with departments that I am complaining about. ONCE MORE THE IPO HAVE INDOCTRINATED ANOTHER GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT THAT I HAVE GONE TO TO GET JUSTICE.....OTHERS INCLUDE THE DPS, THE MET, THE PARLIAMENTARY OMBUDSMAN AND SO ON.IT IS ALL A SHAM AND DISGRACEFUL and they are able to get away with it, time and again. They wouldn't if I were rich!
Their remark that I have been 'involved in a long running dispute' is said by them, to make me out as a litigious person. Yet who started all the legal actions?..ROBERT BUSBRIDGE, IN 2002 WHEN HE APPLIED TO REGISTER THE MARK THAT I OWNED AND AT THE SAME TIME APPLIED TO HAVE MY TRADE MARK MADE INVALID. ENOUGH SAID????
Now that is pretty well all the actions I could take to get Justice and they have run their course. I will next week get all the latest documents onto this blog and you can read for yourself what has gone on in my latest efforts to get Justice from a number of quarters. (The Attorney General and the ICO.) I will type out explanation remarks for each document that has been lately generated.
There will also be documents from my battle to get the Attorney General to get the Police to investigate Busbridges forgery and perjury. You will be able to see what that bastard is all about too. Another useless sickening ***** filling his pockets with Public money and refusing to help those who he is supposed to serve and by a litany of excuses and outright lies. Yet another civil servant covering up for his fellow tossers. You will see how devious he and his minion McGinty has lied as laid out in my recent post. How I am told over and over how he cannot involve himself, but tucked away I am told that if I can prove by evidence I send him, then he could take steps, yet when I do exactly that all I get is a continuation of excuses. It is all there in black and white if you care to read it all.
Wednesday 6 July 2011
Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 62.
NICK HERBERT THE POLICE MINISTER.
You will see on this blog that I have written a detailed book (Justice Denied) on the whole of this sordid story of IP theft by Robert Busbridge, how I was treated by endless corrupt and useless government civil servants who sided with this conman and who then stripped me of my IP and gave it to the crook Busbridge. How I then have tried to get Justice to absolutely no effect by the following entities:-
The IPO, The Police, the IPCC, the Justice Minister Ken Clarke, The Attorney General, plus
a host of MP's including my own useless tosser, Chope and so on-ad nauseam. I wrote this book 'Justice Denied' because as I am not rich I could not afford to go to law to try and get Justice. If I had been rich none of this would have happened anyway as I would have stopped it 20 years ago by using the best law brains in IP. I also decided the book should be sent to as many influencial people and bodies as possible, and I will be commentating in the next post on who I sent the book to and how it has been receiveda nd how successful I have or have not been.
For now this post is about one of those MP's one Nick Herbert the Minister for Police. I wanted him to be able to see what the organisation he should be responsible for have done to me. So off went the book with a covering letter. Today I got the book back with a covering letter which once again tells you how our governments think about the people who put them where they are and pays their overblown wages. How they really hold us in contempt, for what they do amounts to this and insults us further. My letter to Herbert and the reply I got from one of his faceless organ monkies will shortly go onto this blog, along with all the backlog that has built up of other documents of recent times, all from similar useless costly bodies of unctuous civil servants.
" The Minister receives so much correspondence that he is unable to reply personally to all those who write to him" So it starts straight away with a put down for this was no ordinary letter....IT WAS A LONG BOOK ON A VERY SERIOUS MATTER OF CORRUPTION WHICH INCLUDED THE VERY BODY HE IS SUPPOSED TO BE IN CONTROL OF!!WHICH OBVIOUSLY HAD TAKEN THE WRITER A LONG TIME TO WRITE AND HAVE PRINTED, AT NO SMALL COST. OBVIOUSLY ALL THAT HAS GONE OVER THE EMPTY HEAD OF THIS TOSSER, OR HE IS BEING THE USUAL CYNICAL SERVANT THEY ALL SEEM TO BE?
The writer then goes into a typical civil service, wafflespeak load of tripe, in which they make all sorts of excuses rather than give you a result. I will not repeat it all here, for it is all irrelevant trash. I say this for HE IS CALLED THE MINISTER FOR POLICE. Now what should that tell us?????? The writer, another McGinty character seems to think the Minister has no control over the Police at all, so what the hell is he for, I ask? This one goes by the handle of B.McGuire of no known gender and the letter is headed The Home Office.
The very same shower who sent me a letter some months back telling me that if the Police did not investigate it was tough shit mate! They are a force unto themselves AND NO ONE CAN CONTROL THEM!! I was to take my own legal action !!!!!!!!!
This is why we are forever being assailed, almost on a daily basis, of lurid stories about how the Police have failed one poor family after another. If it isn't useless coppers cocking up an important murder investigation, they are indulging in yet more corruptness, as in today's story about how more than 8 bastards stitched up 4 innocent men for murder and are now belatedly being done themselves. To messing up the Dowler investigation and to sitting on the facts about the NOTW phone hacking story, because they were all getting back handers. The very same old firm of the Met who colluded with the IPO to stop me getting justice!!
My point in this post is that this useless overpaid tosser Nick Herbert...what is he for and why is it that his Organ Grinder Monkies are deliberately keeping from him a story that HE SHOULD KNOW ABOUT? (they probably got straight onto the phone to their IPO mates to see what it was all about and were told to bury it)......DON'T THEY MAKE YOU SICK.
You will see on this blog that I have written a detailed book (Justice Denied) on the whole of this sordid story of IP theft by Robert Busbridge, how I was treated by endless corrupt and useless government civil servants who sided with this conman and who then stripped me of my IP and gave it to the crook Busbridge. How I then have tried to get Justice to absolutely no effect by the following entities:-
The IPO, The Police, the IPCC, the Justice Minister Ken Clarke, The Attorney General, plus
a host of MP's including my own useless tosser, Chope and so on-ad nauseam. I wrote this book 'Justice Denied' because as I am not rich I could not afford to go to law to try and get Justice. If I had been rich none of this would have happened anyway as I would have stopped it 20 years ago by using the best law brains in IP. I also decided the book should be sent to as many influencial people and bodies as possible, and I will be commentating in the next post on who I sent the book to and how it has been receiveda nd how successful I have or have not been.
For now this post is about one of those MP's one Nick Herbert the Minister for Police. I wanted him to be able to see what the organisation he should be responsible for have done to me. So off went the book with a covering letter. Today I got the book back with a covering letter which once again tells you how our governments think about the people who put them where they are and pays their overblown wages. How they really hold us in contempt, for what they do amounts to this and insults us further. My letter to Herbert and the reply I got from one of his faceless organ monkies will shortly go onto this blog, along with all the backlog that has built up of other documents of recent times, all from similar useless costly bodies of unctuous civil servants.
" The Minister receives so much correspondence that he is unable to reply personally to all those who write to him" So it starts straight away with a put down for this was no ordinary letter....IT WAS A LONG BOOK ON A VERY SERIOUS MATTER OF CORRUPTION WHICH INCLUDED THE VERY BODY HE IS SUPPOSED TO BE IN CONTROL OF!!WHICH OBVIOUSLY HAD TAKEN THE WRITER A LONG TIME TO WRITE AND HAVE PRINTED, AT NO SMALL COST. OBVIOUSLY ALL THAT HAS GONE OVER THE EMPTY HEAD OF THIS TOSSER, OR HE IS BEING THE USUAL CYNICAL SERVANT THEY ALL SEEM TO BE?
The writer then goes into a typical civil service, wafflespeak load of tripe, in which they make all sorts of excuses rather than give you a result. I will not repeat it all here, for it is all irrelevant trash. I say this for HE IS CALLED THE MINISTER FOR POLICE. Now what should that tell us?????? The writer, another McGinty character seems to think the Minister has no control over the Police at all, so what the hell is he for, I ask? This one goes by the handle of B.McGuire of no known gender and the letter is headed The Home Office.
The very same shower who sent me a letter some months back telling me that if the Police did not investigate it was tough shit mate! They are a force unto themselves AND NO ONE CAN CONTROL THEM!! I was to take my own legal action !!!!!!!!!
This is why we are forever being assailed, almost on a daily basis, of lurid stories about how the Police have failed one poor family after another. If it isn't useless coppers cocking up an important murder investigation, they are indulging in yet more corruptness, as in today's story about how more than 8 bastards stitched up 4 innocent men for murder and are now belatedly being done themselves. To messing up the Dowler investigation and to sitting on the facts about the NOTW phone hacking story, because they were all getting back handers. The very same old firm of the Met who colluded with the IPO to stop me getting justice!!
My point in this post is that this useless overpaid tosser Nick Herbert...what is he for and why is it that his Organ Grinder Monkies are deliberately keeping from him a story that HE SHOULD KNOW ABOUT? (they probably got straight onto the phone to their IPO mates to see what it was all about and were told to bury it)......DON'T THEY MAKE YOU SICK.
Tuesday 5 July 2011
Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 61.
WHAT DID I SAY TO YOU ABOUT THE ICO?????
I have now got their decision letter about my complaint about the Dorset Police Service and them not handling my request for information under the FOIA and the DPA.
You will have to go back to my posts about all that and see the attached emails and letters from me to them and vice versa.
They behaved disgracefully in the way they handled my request and basically put two fingers up to me, which is the norm these days for the Police wherever. Even a complaint to their Chief and the IPCC as you will also know from previous posts-got me absolutely nowhere.
This latest exercise in utter futility has gone exactly the same way. With yet another government department/quangoe refusing to act and siding with their bretheren fellow civil servants. The writer said that "It is likely that the DPS has complied with the requirements of the DPA" Now I don't know about you, but that is definitely not an unequivical statement made, because the writer has evidence they did. It is a wishy washy statement that one could say that equally it is unlikely they didn't. It is obvious that the ICO did not receive from the Dorset Police Service any evidence that the DPS did 100% act within the requirements of the Data Protection Act, as I am sure if they had, they would have said so in a firmer statement. In other words we are giving the benefit of the doubt to the Police because that is how we work. We do not work on behalf of complainents (the Public that is) we work for our fellow civil servants.
All my evidence that I was treated like SHIT by this lying copper Shaun Waldbridge, by him failing to deal with my request in the laid down proper manner and within DPA/FOIA rules, was cast aside and ignored as usual.
Then this Kelly Steen who wrote this garbage, further shows us all just how corrupt even her department is, by saying that the DPS 'appeared likely that they have provided you with the information held about you at the time of your request. Now as this simply did not happen we have to take it that again the ICO has seen no evidence that they did, because again they can only manage another limp 'well it is LIKELY etc etc' IT SIMPLY IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH AND IT IS EXACTLY WHAT I EXPECTED OF THEM.
Then Miss Steen compounds her uselessness by going onto state 'They have confirmed that the emails had been deleted by the time of your request'. Now what this is referring to is the ONE email I knew the IPO had sent DS Brimicombe, in which the IPO would have well and truly slagged me off and warned the DPS what a wanker I was and a trouble maker and not to have anything to do with me, let alone show me the email that would damn them all.
NOW DO NOT FORGET THAT BOTH THE DPS AND THE IPO HAVE BOTH REFUSED TO DIVULGE THIS EMAIL, NO DOUBT A DAMNING EMAIL, WHICH WOULD HANG THEM ALL.....THE ABSOLUTE BASTARDS.
What you should know is that as soon as I had got hold of the email that told me that a further email would be forthcoming to the DPS from the IPO, I asked to see it. That would be within no more than a week or so of my getting from that DS Brimicombe, a copy of the first email from the IPO to DS Brimicombe, because he left the email in my dossier that I'd given him. So are we to believe that the Police routinely get rid of all incoming emails within days of receiving them?...pull the other one. So it is yet more Police lying and the ICO going along with it.
This duplicitous Steen woman then goes into a protection mode of making excuses about how long organisations are allowed to keep emails etc before they trash them. We have to believe going on this case and what is claimed to have happened to that email, that it is only for a few days, and I simply do not belive that.
So what this means is that all three of my other requests to the ICO re the withheld documents, withheld by the Parliamentary Ombudsman, the Met Police and the IPO themselves, will end up the exact same way this has. Each organisation will trot out excuses and the ICO will back them and defend them with a litany of lying excuses.
What makes me so mad with all the government bodies that we the Public are supposed to be able to use to obtain justice against the civil service trash departments that shaft us and lie to us and side with the very people we are complaining about, are all sitting there in their vast offices all paid for by the Public purse. They consume millions of pounds of our money doing absolutely nothing. Shuffling peices of paper around making it look like they are seriously taking up complaints. When all the time, all it is is window dressing, smoke and mirrors to fool us that indeed there are organistions that will help us when we get done over by lying, useless, duplicious civil servants!! What a cesspit of iniquity the Establishment of this country are. I have said it before and I will say it again. There is no democracy in this country, no freedoms and we really live in a country no better that any dictators country or any banana Replublic. Yet these POLITICIAQNS RANT AND RAVE AT THE ASSADS AND GADAFFI'S OF THIS WORLD WHEN THEY DO TO THEIR PUBLIC THE SAME AS WE REALLY DO TO OURS. The only difference is that here the trash Politicians do it in a much more sophisticated way. They do not bump people off or make them disappear, but they just block any attempts to use the systems we are told should give us JUSTICE. It all goes back to what I have said time and again....IN THIS ROTTEN COUNTRY YOU ONLY GET JUSTICE IF YOU CAN AFFORD IT!! EVEN THEN THEY CAN STILL BLOCK YOU IF THEY WANT, BY JUST MAKING SURE YOU WILL GET A JUDGE WHO IS IN THEIR PAY LIKE JUDGE HOBBS.....(Refer to my previous posts on him and how that bumbling oaf Clarke refused to investigate his corruption (despite the evidence) and the way he manipulated the appeal hearing he was supposed to hear, in collusion with the IPO, so as to block my getting justice and showing how corrupt and useless the IPO really are.)
I have now got their decision letter about my complaint about the Dorset Police Service and them not handling my request for information under the FOIA and the DPA.
You will have to go back to my posts about all that and see the attached emails and letters from me to them and vice versa.
They behaved disgracefully in the way they handled my request and basically put two fingers up to me, which is the norm these days for the Police wherever. Even a complaint to their Chief and the IPCC as you will also know from previous posts-got me absolutely nowhere.
This latest exercise in utter futility has gone exactly the same way. With yet another government department/quangoe refusing to act and siding with their bretheren fellow civil servants. The writer said that "It is likely that the DPS has complied with the requirements of the DPA" Now I don't know about you, but that is definitely not an unequivical statement made, because the writer has evidence they did. It is a wishy washy statement that one could say that equally it is unlikely they didn't. It is obvious that the ICO did not receive from the Dorset Police Service any evidence that the DPS did 100% act within the requirements of the Data Protection Act, as I am sure if they had, they would have said so in a firmer statement. In other words we are giving the benefit of the doubt to the Police because that is how we work. We do not work on behalf of complainents (the Public that is) we work for our fellow civil servants.
All my evidence that I was treated like SHIT by this lying copper Shaun Waldbridge, by him failing to deal with my request in the laid down proper manner and within DPA/FOIA rules, was cast aside and ignored as usual.
Then this Kelly Steen who wrote this garbage, further shows us all just how corrupt even her department is, by saying that the DPS 'appeared likely that they have provided you with the information held about you at the time of your request. Now as this simply did not happen we have to take it that again the ICO has seen no evidence that they did, because again they can only manage another limp 'well it is LIKELY etc etc' IT SIMPLY IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH AND IT IS EXACTLY WHAT I EXPECTED OF THEM.
Then Miss Steen compounds her uselessness by going onto state 'They have confirmed that the emails had been deleted by the time of your request'. Now what this is referring to is the ONE email I knew the IPO had sent DS Brimicombe, in which the IPO would have well and truly slagged me off and warned the DPS what a wanker I was and a trouble maker and not to have anything to do with me, let alone show me the email that would damn them all.
NOW DO NOT FORGET THAT BOTH THE DPS AND THE IPO HAVE BOTH REFUSED TO DIVULGE THIS EMAIL, NO DOUBT A DAMNING EMAIL, WHICH WOULD HANG THEM ALL.....THE ABSOLUTE BASTARDS.
What you should know is that as soon as I had got hold of the email that told me that a further email would be forthcoming to the DPS from the IPO, I asked to see it. That would be within no more than a week or so of my getting from that DS Brimicombe, a copy of the first email from the IPO to DS Brimicombe, because he left the email in my dossier that I'd given him. So are we to believe that the Police routinely get rid of all incoming emails within days of receiving them?...pull the other one. So it is yet more Police lying and the ICO going along with it.
This duplicitous Steen woman then goes into a protection mode of making excuses about how long organisations are allowed to keep emails etc before they trash them. We have to believe going on this case and what is claimed to have happened to that email, that it is only for a few days, and I simply do not belive that.
So what this means is that all three of my other requests to the ICO re the withheld documents, withheld by the Parliamentary Ombudsman, the Met Police and the IPO themselves, will end up the exact same way this has. Each organisation will trot out excuses and the ICO will back them and defend them with a litany of lying excuses.
What makes me so mad with all the government bodies that we the Public are supposed to be able to use to obtain justice against the civil service trash departments that shaft us and lie to us and side with the very people we are complaining about, are all sitting there in their vast offices all paid for by the Public purse. They consume millions of pounds of our money doing absolutely nothing. Shuffling peices of paper around making it look like they are seriously taking up complaints. When all the time, all it is is window dressing, smoke and mirrors to fool us that indeed there are organistions that will help us when we get done over by lying, useless, duplicious civil servants!! What a cesspit of iniquity the Establishment of this country are. I have said it before and I will say it again. There is no democracy in this country, no freedoms and we really live in a country no better that any dictators country or any banana Replublic. Yet these POLITICIAQNS RANT AND RAVE AT THE ASSADS AND GADAFFI'S OF THIS WORLD WHEN THEY DO TO THEIR PUBLIC THE SAME AS WE REALLY DO TO OURS. The only difference is that here the trash Politicians do it in a much more sophisticated way. They do not bump people off or make them disappear, but they just block any attempts to use the systems we are told should give us JUSTICE. It all goes back to what I have said time and again....IN THIS ROTTEN COUNTRY YOU ONLY GET JUSTICE IF YOU CAN AFFORD IT!! EVEN THEN THEY CAN STILL BLOCK YOU IF THEY WANT, BY JUST MAKING SURE YOU WILL GET A JUDGE WHO IS IN THEIR PAY LIKE JUDGE HOBBS.....(Refer to my previous posts on him and how that bumbling oaf Clarke refused to investigate his corruption (despite the evidence) and the way he manipulated the appeal hearing he was supposed to hear, in collusion with the IPO, so as to block my getting justice and showing how corrupt and useless the IPO really are.)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)