Stuffed by the State- how it can ruin your life. 78.

     Please read the previous post to this before you (or after) view this video as it gives you

                           addtional info on facts contained in the video. Thanks.

DECEMBER 2017- I HAVE NOW OBTAINED A BARRISTER-COUNSEL'S OPINION ON THIS THOROUGHLY CORRUPT 2005 BOGUS IPO HEARING, THAT I TALK ABOUT IN THIS VIDEO- HE AGREES WITH EVERY POINT I HAVE MADE. HE MAKES 11 LEGAL POINTS AS TO HOW IT WAS ILLEGAL INCLUDING THE FACT THAT I WAS DENIED ATTENDANCE TO IT. IN THE NEW YEAR I WILL BE PUTTING ON HERE A SECOND VIDEO WHERE I WILL GO OVER WHAT HE SAID.

I AM  PUTTING ONTO THIS BLOG COPY OF HIS OPINION LETTER WHICH CAN BE
                          SEEN ON A LINK TO THE RIGHT OF BLOG PAGE .
YOU WILL SEE HE BRINGS UP 11 LEGAL POINTS WHICH I HERE LIST:-

1. HE AGREES IT WAS NOT AN 'APPEAL' HEARING, SO WHY WAS IT HELD?
2. THE 'APPOINTED PERSON'(AP) SHOULD HAVE DEALT ONLY WITH THE DECISION OF LANDAU.
3. THE IPO SHOULD NOT HAVE DENIED ME THE RIGHT TO ATTEND AS IT DEALT WITH MY 'REGISTERED TRADE MARK'. THE A.P SHOULD HAVE NOTIFIED ME OF THE HEARING AND THAT I COULD ATTEND.
4. THE A.P DID NOT 'DETERMINE THE APPEAL' BROUGHT BY BUSBRIDGE.(in other words he never dealt with it in any way)
5. THE A.P DID NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO ADJOURN THE ALLEGED APPEAL-'HIGHLY IRREGULAR' (this is legal speak for 'ILLEGAL)
6. IT WAS UNLAWFUL TO ALLOW THE APPELLANT (RB) TO WITHDRAW AND 'FIX' DEFECTS IN HIS CASE. 
7. RB HAD NO RIGHTS TO REGISTER THE TRADE MARK ON THE BASIS OF ALLEGED ASSIGNMENTS (As decreed by the Landau decision he was supposed top be appealing)
8. THE A.P 'MISUNDERSTOOD' (DELIBERATELY I SAY) THE DECISION OF LANDAU.
9. THE MANNER IN WHICH THE BOGUS APPEAL HEARING WAS CONDUCTED WAS 'IRREGULAR' AND SHOULD HAVE BEEN TAKEN ON TO A JUDICIAL REVIEW.
10. MR JAMES OF THE IPO LEGAL DEPARTMENT HAD NO RIGHT TO BE PRESENT.
11. THE A.P SHOULD NOT HAVE ADVISED RB AS HE DID THROUGHOUT THIS BOGUS HEARING AND EVEN STATED HE SHOULD NOT-BUT CARRIED ON DOING IT ANYWAY!!!! 

THE WHOLE OF THIS HEARING WAS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE AS I HAVE CLAIMED FOR YEARS, WITH THE IPO  AND MORE IMPORTANTLY THE JUSTICE MINISTRY & THEIR MINISTER-REFUSING TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT.

Corrupt Police & The Justice System-stopping me getting Justice. 77.

        THOSE INTENDING TO READ THE ABOVE VIDEO SHOULD READ THIS FIRST. 

In this blog you will have seen posts where I have outlined the worst event in the 18 year history of  7 Tribunal hearings and 1 County Court case that were inflicted upon me by the IPO. That was the bogus alleged Appeal Hearing held in 2005 before a Appointed Person (acting as a judge as it were) The actions of Hobbs QC was that he unlawfully gave a long session of advice giving and this was dressed up as an Appeal Hearing against a previous hearing, that my ex agent Busbridge had lost and allegedly was appealing.

THE VIDEO I HAVE MADE WHERE I OUTLINE IN DETAIL WHAT WENT ON AT THAT HEARING, IS NOW TO BE SEEN ON THIS BLOG-ABOVE AND ON THE RIGHT- JUST CLICK ON THAT VIDEO AND GET THE FACTS LEADING UP TO AND ON THE BOGUS MEETING, HOW IT WAS UNLAWFUL AND THE RAMIFICATIONS THAT HIT ME AFTER. IT LASTS NEARLY 2 HOURS BUT THAT IS BECAUSE THERE ARE A LOT OF FACTS. THOSE REALLY INTERESTED IN HOW OUR STATE STUFFS UP PEOPLE, WILL NOT MIND TAKING THIS AMOUNT OF TIME TO VIEW IT....ESPECIALLY THOSE WHO HAVE IP THEY HAVE TO PROTECT, OR ARE BEING 'STUFFED' THEMSELVES IN ANYWAY BY ANY DYSFUNCTIONAL AND OR CORRUPT GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT. FOR THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT CAN HAPPEN TO YOU-YOUR LIFE-YOUR I/P-YOUR BUSINESS AND ALL PERPETRATED BY THE VERY GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT THAT IS SUPPOSED TO HELP THE PUBLIC WHO HAVE GENERATED IP................... FOR THEY ARE INCOMPETENT-USELESS AND CORRUPT AND YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO GET ANY JUSTICE AGAINST THEM 
                                   

                                  ......WHEN THEY "STUFF YOU UP"........ 

I have pointed out ad nauseum how in this country, if you are not rich you cannot get Justice and here, this was the case. That Hobbs QC guy and James the IPO legal Manager who also was present (and should not have been there at all) should have been taken by me to court for Criminal Acts they perpetrated. How could I afford to do that? The Police refused to act in 2010/11 as also can be seen in previous posts. The Justice Ministry also lied and in effect refused to act.....A CLASSIC CASE OF THE UK ESTABLISHMENT COVERING UP MISDEEDS AND REFUSING TO GIVE A PERSON JUSTICE.

A couple of months ago, I approached a so called Charity? called Bar Probono in London to get legal advice on this meeting and the criminal acts and how I could get justice. They put any approach to them, to Barristers who will look at your case and give this advice..............THE BIG PROBLEM HERE AS IN MY CASE.........I AM TRYING TO GET JUSTICE AGAINST ANOTHER BARRISTER. SO I KNEW THAT IT NO DOUBT, WOULD BE YET ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF HOW THE ESTABLISHMENT WOULD NOT BE HONEST AND WOULD LIE IN ORDER TO NOT GIVE THE HONEST INDEPENDENT ADVICE THAT I NEEDED !!

A few days ago I eventually got their reply and it was exactly as I had expected.....an exercise of covering the back of another Establishment member....another Barrister. (Hobbs QC) This is what I was told:- "The barrister who reviewed your application did not consider your case had sufficient chances of success to justify asking one of our volunteer barristers to assist" He then went on to say "In the criminal courts the standard of proof for an allegation of criminal conspiracy to pervert the course of justice is high and it is difficult to see how any motive could be proved" Oh, and is this all one has to prove when a criminal act is committed????? Utter bullshit- So the transcript of what went on at that alleged hearing is not proof of anything. That they were openly giving a claimant advice on how to overturn a decison could not be openly seen in that transcript.

THAT A BARRISTER HAD GIVEN ME HIS THOUGHTS ON THAT HEARING, AS YOU CAN SEE ON A PREVIOUS POST. HE HAD NO DIFFICULTY TO SEE WHAT HAD GONE ON WAS NOT LAWFUL. NO IT'S A CASE OF BARRISTERS DON'T WANT TO TAKE ON OTHER BARRISTERS.

IT'S ALL THEM COVERING THEIR BARRISTER MATES BACKSIDES-THE OLD BOY NETWORK AT WORK. NOW TH BARRISTER WHO GAVE ME HIS OPINION WAS 'SOUTH AFRICAN' AND DIDN'T MUCH LIKE THE BRITISH ESTABLISHMENT.

Well he obviously thinks I am but an idiot, who does not know the law in a case like this.....for the BASTARDS PUT ME THROUGH A TWO WEEK COURT CASE ON EXACTLY THE SAME CHARGES ...PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE AND WAY BACK IN 2000. THEN THE POLICE AND CPS AND JUSTICE SYSTEM HAD NO PROBLEMS IN DOING WHAT THEY DID TO ME.....(A POST ON ALL THAT CAN BE SEEN- AND THERE WAS NEVER ANY MENTION IN THEIR EVIDENCE PUT AGAINST ME ....OF ME HAVING ANY MOTIVE!!! BUT THEN I AM NOT A BARRISTER !!!!! AND WHAT MOTIVE COULD I HAVE HAD IN THAT PARTICULAR CASE ??? HENCE WHY I WAS EASILY PROVEN TO BE INNOCENT.

This waffle about proving motive is a nonsense because; say one is accused of murder, does a motive to murder have to be proved in order to go ahead and charge someone with murder? For murders are committed daily these days where yobs/immigrants and lowlife are murdering people they don't even know and therefore can have NO MOTIVE.....they just do it as they are out of control arseholes. However in this case I can actually prove motive, but did not say so as it was irrelevant to what I was asking for. WHICH WAS:- I only asked that a barrister looked at whether the meeting was a bona-fide appeal hearing/was it obvious that despite giving legal advice in ANY hearing in ANY court of law, being unlawful, the legal entity holding that meeting-obviously GAVE A BUCKET LOAD OF ADVICE and if he/she agreed that those two points were as I said they were....how could I go on and get justice??? Take note here, I did not even mention a criminal conspiracy having taken place or me taking it to any court! So you see what was said WAS YET ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF HOW OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM AND MOST IN IT ARE THOROUGHLY CORRUPT. However I am not finished yet- IN MY BATTLE TO FIND JUST-one honest LAWYER and one not afraid of the Establishment and willing to give me an opinion!!

TO EXPAND:-For what I had asked Bar Prono is to look at the transcript of that bogus meeting and either agree with me that (A) It was a bogus appeal as no grounds for having one where given (B) at the meeting no discussions of any grounds that were given were discussed as they should have been; that (C) the whole meeting was obviously set up to GIVE ADVICE TO BUSBRIDGE SO HE COULD CARRY OUT THAT ADVICE AND EVENTUALLY STEAL MY TRADE MARK WITH THE HELP OF THE IPO (D) THAT WHAT THE APPOINTED PERSON ACTUALLY DID WAS ILLEGAL AS HE HAD BLATANTLY GIVEN LEGAL ADVICE BY THE BUCKET LOAD. (E) That by Busbridge carrying out the advice he was then able to go on and ruin my life and business and I have documentary evidence that was given in the 2010 hearing, which showed that the IPO had all along wanted to take my Trade Mark off me, because they said...."THEY'D MADE A MISTAKE GIVING IT ME". WHAT BETTER MOTIVE CAN THERE BE FOR THE IPO TO HAVE DONE WHAT THEY DID AT THAT CRIMINAL MEETING IN 2005?????? FOR THE EFFECTS OF IT-EVENTUALLY ENABLED THE IPO TO DO WHAT OBVIOUSLY THEY HAD WANTED TO DO FOR SOME YEARS......TO STRIP ME OF MY LEGALLY OBTAINED TRADE MARK THEY HAD GRANTED ME IN 2002....REMEMBER WHAT HEARING OFFICER SALTHOUSE SAID AT THAT HEARING...IT IS IN THIS BLOG ....WORDS TO THE EFFECT OF "It will be as if the Mark had never been granted in the first place" Plus saying that they had made "A MISTAKE IN GRANTING IT TO ME".....ALL TO BE SEEN IN THE TRANSCRIPT OF THAT 2010 UTTERLY CORRUPT HEARING. (Which I have)

That is a clear case of perverting the course of justice and it gives the IPO a MOTIVE for what they did at this BOGUS 2005 MEETING. For after it they had set in motion events they made sure I could not stop and that right up to the 2010 hearing, when they finalised their wish to strip me of my legally gained Trade Mark.

Of course the barrister reviewing my papers and the Transcript, gives me no opinion of what went on in that bogus meeting and the fact it can clearly be seen  (read the damning document and see for yourself) that advice is being given....illegally. That was clearly and exactly what I had asked him to do ....give ONLY an opinion as to the lawfulness etc of the meeting and if he agreed it was bogus and unlawful acts had taken place ....how could I get justice? So Folks; the whole system we have in the GLORIOUS LAW ABIDING COUNTRY OF OURS IS ACTUALLY ROTTEN TO THE CORE. TRYING TO WIN AGAINST OUR ESTABLISHMENT AND WITHOUT HAVING MONEY TO DO SO MEANS YOU ARE

                                             "STUFFED BY THE STATE"


POINTS TO PONDER....HAVE YOU EVER READ OF ANY JUDGE OR BARRISTER OR LAWYER, EVER GETTING CHARGED ...LET ALONE CONVICTED OF ANYTHING APART FROM STEALING CLIENTS MONEY.....WHICH OF COURSE THEY DO???

SO KEEP WATCHING THIS BLOG TO FIND OUT WHERE IF ANYWHERE I GET WITH THIS

           DO TAKE THE TIME TO LOOK AT "STUFFED BY THE STATE" VIDEO.

      ANYONE WISHING TO RAISE QUESTIONS....OFFER ADVICE.... CAN DO SO BY
       CONTACTING ME....DETAILS ON HOW TO ARE ON THIS BLOG IF YOU LOOK
                                               -ON MY PROFILE FACTS-

Corrupt Police & IPO- how they aided a crook. 76.

THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE.

These thoroughly despicable bastards are the ones responsible for the start of this blog back in 2008 when one of their thoroughly corrupt  law officers, one Mr James, aided by another corrupt bastard HOBBS QC, from the Treasury Solicitors. They ran a corrupt bogus appeal hearing which was nothing more than a cosy meeting between them and my arch enemy, my criminal ex agent for my cars.

They spent, it must have been at least 2 hours, not carrying out a bona-fide appeal hearing he'd asked for, but in any case, had no legal rights to have one, but giving him many tips and advice as what to do to circumvent the last hearing he'd lost to me. When I managed to wheedle out of the IPO the transcript, I could see all the corruption that had gone on at that meeting. So I started this blog to get it out into the open and expose all the bastards, including the police who refused and in connivance with the IP, to investigate all the criminal acts, despite a shed load of documentary evidence that I gave them.

Well in the last year having got myself into a position where I had not much else to do, I started thinking back to this infamous meeting dressed up as an appeal hearing. Plus how I simply could not find a  way to get justice. For quite some time ago I decided that trying to run a campaign which would deal with ALL the corruption seen in 7 hearings, was going to be too big a task. When I only needed to concentrate on the one which tipped the balance against me. That was this bogus appeal hearing held in 2005 and before a person designated as an Appointed Person....sounds grand doesn't it but is far from actually being grand. For this bastard HOBBS QC, aided and abetted by the IPO's head of their law section, a snide by the name of James. They got their dirty and corrupt heads together and concocted a method whereby they could do me out of my 'Registered' trademark; 'Viper'.

Why did they want to do this WHEN THE IPO IS SUPPOSED TO BE SQUEAKY CLEAN AND
INDEPENDENT? It was a question that beat upon my brains for many a year after that fateful event in 2005. I'd worked out that for some reason the IPO did not want me to have that Mark, but why? So recently I have been going through all the papers with a view to now get retribution and do that by getting those two criminal civil servants into a court. Not an easy task when the Establishment is doing everything it can to stop me as they always do. All shown in past posts where I have reported all my efforts to the newspapers, TV investigative programmes, the Justice Minister, law firms and Uncle tom Cobbly an all. All with no success so far, but I'm still not defeated completely.

Now after spending a lot of time reading all the evidence documents and the transcripts of the 6 hearings plus that bogus meeting/appeal and right up to the last hearing in 2010, in which the IPO completed its campaign to strip me of my legally owned Trade Mark. I have now at last seen what the bastards were upto and their reason. The reason was there staring me in the face-in the transcript of that last corrupt hearing in 2010. This hearing was heard by a Mr Salthouse, an obvious bully of a man, hand picked to do the ultimate dirty deed they'd wanted since 1998 to do against me. Who walked all over my expensive lawyer, a wimp who did not see it or stand up to him.

Mr Salthouse said right at the beginning that the IPO were fed up with this long running case and wanted an end to it and he hoped  that this would be the last hearing. Of course he knew that after the IPO had done their dirty work and stripped me of my trade mark, the only way I'd ever get real justice was to take it to the High Court and they knew I did not have the money to do that. So way into his all his words, he said to my lawyer this pearl of a statement:-

" I am afraid that in the past certain actions of the Registry (IPO) have been proved to be wrong. I would not like to hold too much stock by the fact that we made that decision and therefore that is cast in stone. I regret that we have been overturned too many times to make that the case"

To put that into context, my lawyer had just pointed out to him that I had obtained my registration
based my honest use of the mark (since end 1985) and by the way, well before Chrysler had started to use the same mark on their sportscar; IE that at my opposition to Chryslers application to register my mark, held in 1998 it was honest and the IPO had decided that. I point you to two words he said; 'that decision' so what decision is he talking about? My lawyer was talking about only 'one decison' and that was the decision to grant me the registration of the mark after that 1998 Chrysler hearing. So now you see that this corrupt IPO man was saying that that was a mistake, which 'was not cast in stone' In other words it could be 'overturned' and that is EXACTLY what these bastards then went and did, through this man carrying out their corrupt actions in his decision document. In which it has to be said, was full of waffle and obviously did not OPENLY SAY THAT THEY WERE TAKING IT OFF ME BECAUSE THEY'D MADE THIS MISTAKE BACK IN 1998. OF COURSE THERE WAS NO WAY THEY COULD OPENLY ADMIT THEY'D MADE A MISTAKE AND THIS WAS HOW THEY WERE RECTIFYING IT

What one has to also understand, is this; if the IPO really had made a mistake in their decision at that 1998 hearing, then why did Chrysler not IMMEDIATELY get it into the High Court to rectify it? THEY HAD ALL THE MONEY IN THE WORLD TO DO THAT AND THEY WERE USING A TOP LONDON IP LAW FIRM TO REPRESENT THEM. Yet they never did this and just sat on it for 4 years and did nothing and then gave up when I pushed them. So that makes you wonder why did the IPO think their decision was 'MISTAKE', because Chrysler obviously did not see or think that and make an appeal about it?? So there are still questions to be asked here as to why the IPO still decided to wrest my mark off me, right after they gave me registration? That started with their corrupt 2004 hearing and up to their corrupt and bogus alleged appeal hearing before HOBBS QC and rumbled right up through 2 more corrupt hearings,  to the last corrupt hearing in 2010 before this Salthouse-an IPO goon.  It is obvious to me that this reason Salthouse went on about, is a RECENT IDEA they have thought up to present for this latest case and I could do nothing about it due to the fact I would have to take it all through the HIGH COURT>so impossble and they knew it!!

One would be forgiven for asking why I did not click onto that statement made by Salthouse. At the hearing so many words are uttered you cannot take it all in and when I was reading the decision document I could see early on in it that it was going against me. So I just skipped over the words knowing anyway that all was lost and so the document was just filed away. It was some time before I got a copy of the transcript and even then I never read it thoroughly as the hearing was well and truly over and the dirty deeds had been done. I could not as my lawyer begged me to, take it to the High Court, as I had no money to do so. So it's been registered to the criminal Busbridge and it damns the actions of the IPO ONCE AGAIN AND TO DATE THEY HAVE GOT OFF WITH IT. They should know that its not all over yet as there are still a number of avenues I can go down....which I damn well will do so.
 

Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 75.

HOW LAWYERS REFUSE TO HELP YOU:-

HODGE JONES and ALLEN, a solicitors firm who pose as protectors of the oppressed and boast in their adverts that "WE DO THINGS DIFFERENTLY TO FIGHT INJUSTICE AND DEFEND PEOPLE'S RIGHTS" that all sounds wonderful doesn't it??
Their advertising shows that they specialise in ambulance chasing 'Personal Injury' cases and also specialise in peoples 'Human Rights' (that means they specialise in getting 'illegals' into our country on 'Human Rights' nonsense AND on Legal Aid.
 Now whilst I despise such companies, beggars can't be choosy, seeing as this was the absolute last law firm I may stand a chance with getting them to take on this case. However their website did not make it clear if they did Public Law cases and so began my attempt to find out. Follow the copies of emails back and forth and you will see how I was at first buggered around as usual in even getting them to reply. When they eventually did after me pushing them and talking with this Marcia on the phone, they were suitably vague. Anyway follow the emails and you will see where I ended up......NOWHERE.

THIS IS WHAT WE THE PUBLIC WHO HAVE BEEN SHAT ON BY OUR GOVERNMENT, THEIR CIVIL SERVANTS, THE JUSTICE SYSTEM, JUDGES AND THE WHOLE SODDING LOT OF THEM, HAVE TO PUT UP WITH. TRYING TO GET JUSTICE, WHEN WE HAVE NO MONEY!!!!!!   NOTE THAT THIS COMPANY WAS BUT ONE OF WELL OVER A DOZEN FIRMS I APPROACHED AND GOT NOWHERE WITH ANY OF THEM!


I NOW HAVE TO MOVE ONTO MY NEXT STEP WHICH WILL TAKE SOME TIME TO GO THROUGH THE MOTIONS OF. THIS TIME I HOPE TO BE ABLE TO GET LEGAL ADVICE AS TO HOW TO PROCEED WITH THE CASE AND HOW I CAN GET LEGAL REPRESENTATION. I MAY THEN BE ABLE TO BE ALLOCATED  A LAWYER OR AT LEAST PUT ONTO ONE WHO ISN'T A SHYSTER AND EXCUSE MAKER??

THE FOLLOWING ARE COPIES OF WITE-UPS & ADVERTS WE RAN TO 2002. THEY SHOW HOW SUCCESSFUL MY COMPANY WAS IN SUCH A SHORT SPACE OF TIME. WE WERE APPEARING IN THE MAIN PRESS AS WELL AS VARIOUS CAR MAGAZINES AND
RUNNING MANY ADVERTS. WHAT I SHOW WILL BE ONLY A REPRESENTATION OF THE MANY THAT APPEARED AS THERE ARE TOO MANY TO SHOW ALL OF THEM.

THE OBJECT OF SHOWING THEM, IS TO SHOW YOU THE LEVEL THAT MY BUSINESS WAS, RIGHT UP TO 1991 AND THIS IS WHAT THE IPO/BUSBRIDGE MY LONDON AGENT BETWEEN THEM MANAGED TO TRASH. FROM 1991 ONWARDS, MY BUSINESS WAS AT A FRACTION THAT IT HAD BEEN DUE TO BUSBRIDGE ILLEGALLY USING MY TRADE MARK TO FOOL CUSTOMERS INTO BUYING COPIES OF MY VIPER CAR/KIT AND AIDED BY THE IPO AND THEIR ILLEGAL ACTIONS.

Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 74.

This post actually follows on from the previous one. Because for weeks now I have been thinking of my next steps to get JUSTICE. Previously I had approached various law firms asking if they could take on a case that would have dealt with the whole history of my IP battle from day one, back in 1992. Doing this on either Pro-Bono or on legal aid.

Predictably all those I approached threw their hands up in horror and said either they didn't do IP, which was just an excuse, as most of the unlawful acts were criminal!! Or they made up other excuses like; it's all to long and incredibly complicated. Like we only do simple cases as we are really all 'SIMPLE MINDED IDIOTS'

So over time I got to thinking that there was in anycase, ONE PIVOTAL POINT IN ALL THE HISTORY OF ALL THE HEARINGS ETC.  This was the phony alleged appeal hearing held by JUDGE HOBBS QC IN 2006. Remember that right up to that date I had won, because of what the hearing Officer Landau decreed and Busbridge was attempting to appeal that. Prove that Hobbs and James of the IPO were acting corruptly and "Perverting the Course of Justice" in what they did. For don't forget the ADVICE they gave Busbridge was carried out to the letter and he was HELPED by the IPO and that had the eventual effect, after they'd successfully swung two more hearings, Busbridges way. Then, to them being able in 2010 to illegally take off me, what they had given me after I proved my legal right to the Trade Mark 'Viper' .....You couldn't make it up as they say. Then if I could do that, all that went before or after was immaterial....if you understand. So I had only to prove ONE section of my long fight.

So now I determined that what I should do is find a law firm that isn't corrupt and in the pockets of the Justice System (IS THAT POSSIBLE YOU MAY THINK?) So my time for the past few weeks has been to root out a law firm that will do what I now know is called a PUBLIC LAW case and do it on legal aid. Now what I found in one area will not surprise you:- Many of the law firms that do do Public law are involved in 'Immigrants' and their fights to get to stay here, even when they are patently illegal immigrants or even terrorists. I see there are plenty of law firms falling over themselves to represent them, but not a white Anglo-Saxon Brit like ME! Thought about blacking up and calling myself Mohammed, but then they would throw me in prison for being RACIST !!!!! One such law firm had 76 lawyers on their books of which 60 odd were not Anglo Saxons. What do you think about that? They were not the only such law firm either, who knocked me back, but which  I could see were heavily involved in Public Law cases, over trying to protect their immigrant  customers. Also no problem for them to get huge amounts of Public Money (Legal Aid) for these cases, but not for mine.

Two problems here....One is few law firms do Public cases, as it means going up against Public bodies like government departments, like the IPO and the Police, who have deep tax payers pockets with unlimited money, to fight against anyone who wishes to expose the bastards!! Also they have to be real smart. Then as this case will involve fighting the Justice Ministry and they are the bosses, in essence of all law firms....are they not?????? So how many law firms will want to take them on....you ask? Very good question, but I have been trying anyway.

That involves me first of, all searching the internet for these firms, then sending endless emails asking if they do Public Law and on Legal Aid. I vary the content of my emails from just a few sentences, not mentioning the subject matter, to a brief description that it involves taking on what a Judge did that was illegal. No matter what I say, so far the reactions have been:-
A. Ignore my email completely....so no answer.
B. Deny they do Public Law, or that type of Public Law????
C. State they will not do Legal Aid.
E. Many saying they are TOO BUSY!!But I suspect scared witless because a JUDGE is involved!!

Not replying at all, is in my opinion the height of pure ignorance and bad manners. You would think that people involved in law would be people well educated and from good backgrounds, who should know how to behave decently. After all the LAW is there to GUIDE people in how to behave, not only lawfully but properly and treat others with dignity. Unfortunately in this world now, far too many have no standards or know how to behave decently. I GET REALLY SHAT OFF WITH ALL THESE PEOPLE AND LAW FIRMS, AS THEY ARE ALL SPINELESS HORRORS.

But I have not only written to law firms, as I've hunted out several investigative journalists, bloggers and writers to do with criminal and such like cases. Plus investigative TV programmes like Dispatches and to a few Editors of so called TOP NEWSPAPERS, like the Times and Telegraph and Sunday Times. NOT ONE OF ALL THOSE PEOPLE HAVE EVEN ACKNOWLEDGED RECEIPT OF MY LETTER/EMAIL.....WHAT A SHOWER-THE LOT OF THEM. It shows you how people who have really been shat on by the State like the Hillsborough people and now Grenfell plus this latest scandal of the tainted blood and there are countless others too. All have had to battle for decades and all have been ignored and shat on some more. This is what it is like when you have to fight the British Establishment and I hate the lot of them, as I suspect others do too.



I will post up when all my efforts to find a law firm are exhausted, on where if anywhere I get. I will also post a list of all the law firms etc,who behaved like dogs.

 TO MAKE THIS BLOG MORE INTERESTING I AM NOW GOING TO INCLUDE PICTURES AND COPIES OF ARTICLES RELEVANT TO MY CAR MANUFACTURING BUSINESS THAT THE ESTABLISHMENT IN THE FORM OF THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE, SOUGHT TO DESTROY, AIDED AND ABETTED BY THE DORSET POLICE AND THE JUSTICE MINISTRY. THESE WILL SHOW JUST HOW DEEP INTO USING MY TRADE MARK I WAS AND HOW FAR BACK IT  ALL WENT......ALL LONG BEFORE BUSBRIDGE APPEARED & BEFORE HE PUT IN HIS APPLICATION TO REGISTER MY T/M.

THIS FIRST ARTICLE APPEARED IN MY LOCAL BOURNEMOUTH ECHO PAPER, IN FEBRUARY 1986, NOT LONG AFTER I HAD COMPLETED MY FIRST CAR A COBRA REPLICA. WHICH I THEN NAMED 'VIPER' AND THAT NAME WAS WHAT MY EX AGENT AND CRIMINAL, SOUGHT TO STEAL FROM TO ME, TO SELL TO CHRYSLER FOR HALF A MILLION IN 1992. THUS STARTING THIS SORRY SAGA OF GREED, HUMONGOUS LYING AND CORRUPTION.

ON EACH POST FROM NOW ON I WILL POST FURTHER PICS AND ARTICLES TO CHRONICLE THE RAPID GROWTH OF MY BUSINESS AND POPULARITY OF THE 'VIPER'.
THUS THIS BLOG WILL APPEAL TO READERS WHO LIKE CARS. I WILL ALSO INCLUDE PICS OF OTHER CARS I DESIGNED AND MADE, TO SHOW THAT THE BUSINESS THEY WRECKED WAS NOT A ONE CAR BUSINESS AND AT ITS HEIGHT BEFORE 1992 IT EMPLOYED 25 PEOPLE AND WAS ON TRACK TO TURN OVER A £MILLION AND THAT IN 1989/1990.....ALL EVENTUALLY AND SLOWLY WRECKED BY THE IPO AIDED AND ABETTED BY THE DORSET POLICE. I WILL COMMENT ON THE RELEVANCE OF EACH ARTICLE/PICTURE.

                                                     SO KEEP READING.

                                THE RELEVANCE OF THIS PICTURE/ARTICLE:-

I got my local MP, a twerp by the name of Atkinson, to try and give this article on my new business,
some good exposure and kudos. Alas all this man was interested in, was his own kudos and Brownie points and was obliging, so he could once more get his mug in the paper and pose as if the was actually interested in local business. He later on quickly showed his true colours as you will soon see. That was the start of my intense dislike of MP's and our so called ruling classes.

BELOW:-

ONE OF THE FIRST ARTICLES THAT APPEARED IN THE KITCAR PRESS ABOUT ONE OF MY EARLY BUILDS-A CAR WE MADE FOR A ROVER DEALER IN HIGH WYCOMBE. WE SHOWED IT AT A TRACK DAY AT CASTLE COOMBE AND IT WAS WELL RECEIVED.

A DAILY MAIL ARTICLE IN 1987 SHOWS WE WERE EVEN BEING NOTICED BY THE NATIONAL PRESS ESPECIALLY AS WE WERE SHOWING AT THE LONDON MOTOR SHOW

Corrupt Police & IPO-how they aided a crook. 73.

IPO = Intellectual Property Office.

This is the thoroughly corrupt mob of unmitigated bastards, who prompted me to start this blog way back in 2008. In 2010 after they helped a criminal steal my Intellectual Property off me, in the form of my Trade Mark applied to a sportscar I manufactured and thus ended that business. I went to the equally corrupt Dorset Police to try to get them to investigate the massive amount of perjury that the IPO refused to deal with. All perpetrated by the crook called BUSBRIDGE.

I knew that the DORSET POLICE had spoken at length to the IPO and also sent and received emails about me. I saw one of them, when the thick cop mistakenly sent me a copy. So under the Freedom of Information Act, I requested all copies of all letter and emails that went betwen the two of them. Plus details of phone calls. As is usual with ALL our corrupt institutions they only sent me a couple; one of which was the one already sent me by mistake by plod.

Now today I was looking through my records and came across those they disclosed and you should  think on them, for they show the mindset of not only the IPO, but of course our wonderful Dorset Police. It also show just what I was up against during ALL my dealings, not only with the IPO but then the Dorset Police. I shows just how corrupt all these bastards are and how it is impossible to get justice against them.

First I got a copy of what they call a 'File Note' and this raises the question of:- My dealings with the IPO started in 2002 after Chrysler threw the towel in, after I'd won against their trying to steal my Trade Mark 'Viper'. That meant the IPO now had to give me registration of that. Before that, ALL contact with the IPO was through firstly my Patent Agent and then a lawyer AND NOT ME!!. So direct contact started in 2002 when the IPO, minutes after giving me registration told me they were allowing Busbridge my crook ex agent, who tried to sell MY TRADE MARK to Chrysler for £1/2M saying he owned it !!!! and now the bastard was trying it on through the IPO. Obviously I was very annoyed with the IPO for they knew full well who he was and that he had no legal ownership of that T/M, as he'd been a witness for Chrysler and his involvement with me and the T/M was given in my evidence. Yet here they were allowing him to oppose my recent registration!! WHAT WAS GOING ON ??

After I got his statement of facts, as to why he thought he and not me had ownership of this T/M. I was predictably 'MAD AS HELL' as it was full of lies and forged documents that they had allowed into evidence knowing, given the past history and evidence at the Chrysler hearing, full well it was all lies and not backed up with REAL LEGAL evidence. So on that score I rang the IPO to complain and this is what some jumped up clerk noted about my call:-

Headed "Copy of a filenote Jan 04"........"There is a great deal of history between X (Busbridge my ex agent and a crook).....MR COOK CAN BE VERY DIFFICULT" !!!!! Just get that will you!!!!.If you stand up for your rights against ANY government department civil service shite, you are immediately classed as 'DIFFICULT'. No you should shut-up and say nothing.
For a start how did the IPO know anything about any dealings I'd had between myself and Busbridge before that note was written??????? I had had no direct dealings with Busbridge from 1992 to 2004 over this case as all dealings were through my Patent Agent or a lawyer and they were not endless, so why say 'a great deal'? One wonders if they had dealings with Busbridge behind my back and had listened to all he had to say about me and no doubt slagging me off, or of course, did Chrysler have things to tell them and to try and influence them against me? I would not put that past them.
As the only dealings to then, that the IPO had with me, is when in 2002 I dealt with their CEO a woman called Brimilowe, when I made a formal complaint that they were allowing Busbridge to oppose me, given what I've noted above. All within my rights to do so. Yet here we see that already the IPO was viewing me in a very negative and personal way. They are supposed to be scrupulously independent

I was also given another ' file note' this time dated July 2010 and that was after the IPO has successfully stuck the boot well into me, by taking my Trade Mark off me and don't forget what was said when they did that. For the hearing officer at that time said this :- "It will be as if Mr Cook had NEVER ever been given registration !" and that tells you EXACTLY what the IPO thought of me and how they had manipulated events from 2004 onwards, as recorded in this blog and to get to the position that they could kick me in the teeth and take what I'd previously and legally proved I owned. So you have to read these comments in the light of all that.

For now, they in an email to the Dorset Police who had contacted them (and why did they do that?) when I asked them to investigate all that perjury that the IPO had refused to ever investigate. So they go running to the IPO and they all get together to facilitate the demolition of myself. So they said:-
" Please see the attached document below as requested" (one has to ask why did the DPA ask for my blog details and who told them about it.....the IPO of course and WHY?)," a link to Mr Cook's blog. Some of the entries I found extremely shocking and offensive, so be aware if you do read it" !!!!!!!!!! Incredible!!!!!!

Now all that just shows you how the corrupt DPA and the IPO worked together to demolish me and my rights.....how corrupt is that?? First of all just how did the IPO even know I wrote a blog which up to then was entirely on how they had behaved corruptly and had forced me to go to the police. All is there for one to read if you wish so read all entries before July 2010 and ask yourself....'is any of this shocking and offensive'???? Obviously the IPO are sticking the boot in and intent on making me out to be a MONSTER, because I attacked them and of course in typical civil service attitudes, we have no right to defend our rights and positions!!

What are the IPO were doing here and only God knows what they discussed with the DPA in telephone calls between them? But it is very clear that as I say, they were intent to get the Police not to investigate, by slagging me off and it worked. For the Police TOLD ME THAT THEY WERE AWARE OF MY BLOG AND WHAT WAS IN IT, AS IF I'D BROKEN THE LAW. THAT SAID TO TELL ME THEY THOUGHT I WAS NOT WORTHY OF GETTING AN INVESTIGATION AND INDEED THEY TOLD ME THAT THE IPO HAD SAID THAT PERJURY HADN'T BEEN COMMITTED AND IN ANY CASE IT WAS A 'CIVIL MATTER'.WHICH IS A GROSS LIE!! Thus the Police after slagging me off in a very aggressive manner, refused to investigate......all documented in this blog.

But what I am trying to get over to you after having re-seen these filenotes and comments, is just how corrupt the IPO and Dorset Police of course are and that they stopped at nothing to take my legally owned trade mark off me (that I'd had to prove TO THEM, that I did legally have rights to it, that back in 1996), knowing full well I could not fight back by taking it to the High Court and get the Police to arrest Busbridge for CRIMINAL OFFENSES.

The Dorset Police and the MET Police who also spoke to the IPO over all this, with the same results for me. But worse still, is that I knew full well that there were masses of documents to do with me that they never gave up and they say that they were entitled not to give up certain documents so you wonder what was in those? Many would hold personal comments about me that if I'd seen them could have proved beyond doubt that the IPO were behaving corruptly and were determined that for some reason, they did not want me to ever own that Trade Mark. I have my thoughts as to why that is but will I ever be able WITHOUT THE HELP OF OTHERS, TO GET INTO THEIR RECORDS ON ME AND THIS CASE, AS THEY HAVE THWARTED ALL MY EFFORTS TO DO THIS LEGALLY, AND WITH IMPUNITY.  My efforts to complain about this to the ICO got nowhere as all Ombudsmen are a CON ON THE BRITISH PUBLIC....and that has been the subject of newspaper articles on this corrupt and expensive mob....the ICO.
___________________________________________________________________________________



Now being rich Chrysler used the biggest IP Law firm to represent them, that was around in London. The IP World is a small one and all the big IP lawyers know each other well, as do all those in the IPO. Do you seriously think that the big lawyers representing them, had nothing to say to the high up managers in the IPO law section??? They probably all belonged to the same posh clubs, went to the same Public schools and played golf in the same clubs. That is how the ESTABLISHMENT works all the time. I firmly believe that it was a set up from the beginning, but somehow the Hearing Officer at that hearing when I won against Chrysler, either forgot his script lines and how he was expected to find the case or was an 'honest Joe'. Think I'm dreaming.....then open up the transcript of the Hobbs QC hearing and go to the comments he made about that hearing on pages 33 line 25 and 34 line 1-7.........."I have looked at, as you know, the Registry record. You can get them off the internet with all the case details, the case history.....the long sordid history" Busbridge replies, "I have a couple of those"
Hobbs..."Only a couple, I have the history at the same time relating to Chrysler on a mark (trade) and this looks like a complete and utter mess to me"  
Now reflect on all that for what Hobbs is saying- he has looked at the 'history' and what he is in fact saying is that he has looked at all the papers and decisions made, when I opposed Chysler and won, then when Busbdridge opposed my registration which he corruptly won, but I forced the IPO to look at the legality of some his evidence and another hearing heard all that and by a Hearing Officer; Landau, which  I won. This phony appeal hearing Hobbs was supposed to be hearing, was against the Landau decision.
He is saying that it was all 'a mess and sordid' and it is clear that he thinks that my involvement was 'sordid and a mess' (or maybe he thinks the decision by the HO in 1996 -Chrysler which I won, and the Landau decision which I won was also 'sordid and a mess') It is therefore clear that something here is going on that is very corrupt and ILLEGAL!!

One has to wonder why Hobbs said all that, but I am convinced he had been got at by the IPO and it was all worked out between the IPO and this well known IP lawyer/Judge QC. This phoney appeal hearing was not 'bona-fide', as Busbridge gave no legal grounds to even get an appeal. The IPO needed to act in a way that turned round the Landau decision and how to do this? By setting up a phony appeal hearing where they could give Busbridge all the advice he needed to carry out actions that would allow the IPO to turn it all around. That would then appear to be all kosher. That is exactly what happened and if you read this blog (or the attached book 'Justice denied') in the relevant areas, you will see how Busbridge carried out all the advice that he was given and I eventually ended up in 2010, stripped of my T/M

One should also remind yourself that Hobbs was the biggest I/P Appeal Judge, hearing IPO appeals and cases, where an alleged 'independent appeal officer' would officiate. If you research his case history, he has heard more such cases and big ones than any one, which makes him a person the IPO would be intimately connected to and this phony appeal hearing shows this when you read the way he and James of the IPO talked to each other. Like a pair of close ex school buddies, they were practically having sex with each other!!!!  

Of course all my protestations at what had gone on and my official complaints, were ignored and got nowhere. As my complaints made through the Justice Ministry were swotted down by lies about how any decision made by a Judge could not be altered or complained about. That's a lie for a start as appeals against stupid Judges happen all the time, but here NO DECISION WAS EVER GIVEN AS THE PHONY APPEAL WAS 'DROPPED' BY BUSBRIDGE on Hobbs advice and all he had to do was carry out all the 'advice he'd been given by Hobbs and James helped him do all that, with all the results that can be seen in this blog....BRITISH JUSTICE AT WORK HERE!!!!The justice Ministry when that was pointed out ignored me.



 
   

Corrupt Police & IPO-how they aided a crook. 72.

On a post I made back on the 19th April I told how I had sent a letter to Liz Truss the Justice Minister, where I told her how a Judge had trashed my business and life and how I had found it absolutely impossible to get justice through any avenue, including all the complaint procedures within the justice system. How I had been stonewalled at every turn by the Establishment Johnnies who are not interested in real justice, only protecting their fellow cronies.

JUSTICE MINISTER>

Well yesterday I got a reply, but predictably not from her. So some obnoxious civil servant must have way-laid my letter so she never saw it and had not read it properly, as they never do and then thought that some other government department should be given it so as to bury it in someway. So this letter of reply was from the HM Courts & Tribunals, Customer Investigation Section. Don't they make you seeth these modern twerps that infest all of our PC Plonker government departments. They treat you as if they were a BUSINESS and you are a 'CUSTOMER' and as if you had willingly gone to them to get 'SERVICE' of some sort or to buy something.

It was the predictable short reply they always send you, full of lying excuses as to how they can 'Do nothing' then they trot out one lie after another. They have obviously not read your letter and understood what you were saying or more like it, they have deliberately 'misread' it and that has given them the right to then think up lies to excuse them doing nothing. Every avenue I'd already been down previously had used this absolute lie of an excuse:- "the judiciary are constitutionally independent of government and they must be able to make their decisions without interference"
So what this means is any judge can behave in whatever way they want INCLUDING ACTING IN AN UNLAWFUL WAY....BREAKING THE LAWS THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO UPHOLD!!! and they get off Scott free, as they are 'untouchable'. That is obvious BOLLOCKS for they can be charged when they break the law. Very few do for the same reasons I am coming up against. No politician is willing to stand up to them as is no one in the Police or even our rotten Press.

The letter went on:- "It is therefore not possible for a government Minister to comment on or intervene in matters that have been the subject of judicial consideration" Now you can see how slippery they are and how they use this excuse over and over again -TOTALLY IGNORING WHAT I TOLD THEM IN MY LETTER !! The hearing that Judge Hobbs officiated in was an appeal hearing or was supposed to be. Yet no matters to do with any appeal and what the appellant had given that gave him the right to appeal, and its legal merits etc, were ever discussed. Nor was there ANY DECISION EVERMADE!!!! As the appellant had never raised ANY LEGAL REASONS as to how he could even have an appeal which should have been in the statement he gave when asking for an appeal, which he was legally obliged to do, nothing like that was gone into. As I told them the transcript shows clearly that all that the alleged hearing covered, was this judge giving the appellant a bucket load of ADVICE ON HOW HE COULD CIRCUMVENT THE DECISION GIVEN AGAINST HIM THAT HE WAS SUPPOSED TO BE APPEALING. THIS IS ILLEGAL AND CONSTITUTED AN ACT OF PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE. 
SEE ON THE RIGHT OF THIS PAGE WHERE YOU CAN DOWNLOAD THE TRANSCRIPT AND READ IT YOURSELF.

Of course no one has the guts to want to agree on what actually did happen and to stand up against the 'Judicial Mafia'. Including NEWPAPERS!! This woman writer, a Miss Charlotte Green, whoever she is, went on to say that she had tried to trace my case or find what appeal routes I had taken. This just shows you what THICKO'S I am dealing with. For the case was never heard in front of a 'normal' Court but at a Tribunal Hearing under the auspices of the 'TREASURY SOLICITORS' and what's more, as I plainly told Lizz Truss I was not the person who applied to have an appeal hearing, as it was my enemy and ex agent who stole my Trade Mark and business and they denied me access or any say in that hearing!! So it was obvious she would never be able to trace anything through the normal courts records.

She then cheekily advises me to go to the Citizens Advice, who I approached some time ago and predictably it was so far out of their depths it was a farce, as I knew it would be. No solicitor will touch it, you cannot get Legal Aid and in any case hardly any lawyers do Legal Aid these days except for protecting illegal immigrants and terrorists who want to stay in this country, so they can blow up our kids. It all makes me sick as there are lawyers falling over themselves to do that, but protect a Brit from corrupt lawyers and Judges....NO WAY SO GO AWAY!!

Another lying excuse she kept making was "If I wanted to appeal the 'decision' as I was unhappy with the 'decision' etc" When I specifically said in my letter to Truss that NO APPEAL HEARING TOOK  PLACE AND SO NO 'DECISION' WAS EVER MADE AS THE APPELLANT DROPPED HIS APPEAL!!!!!!!! AND THAT AFTER HE'D GOT THE ADVICE TO DO, SO THEN FOLLOW THEIR INSTRUCTIONS AND THEN HIS LIFE WOULD SUDDENLY TURN INTO LIGHT AND ROSES AND HE COULD THEN GO ON AND FINISH OFF HIS ATTEMPTS TO STEAL MY TRADE MARK AND FINISH OFF MY BUSINESS!!!! HOW CORRUPT AND UNLAWFUL IS ALL THAT AND THE DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE IS ALL THERE FOR ALL TO SEE AND SHOWS THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED.

So you have to either think she was as thick as two short planks and could not grasp what I had said.....or more likely she was being her usual civil service devious lying, and twisting what I had said and that meant she could invent lying excuses to do nothing. I HAD HIGHLIGHTED IN CAPITALS THAT NO DECISION HAD EVER BEEN MADE ETC ETC.  Of course this election has stuffed up me being able to go back to the Justice Minister right now and will it even be Miss Truss??  So more time wasted. But as you can see I am a VERY perservering person who will keep going on.

HERE ARE COPIES  OF THOSE THREE LETTERS BETWEEN ME AND LIZ TRUSS MP, THE REPLY FROM MISS GREEN AND MY REPLY TO HER GIVING HER 'WHAT (Is this rubbish you sent me?  )

READING THEM YOU WILL SEE AND GRASP ALL THAT THIS IS ABOUT......HOW THE POLITICIANS, THEIR DEVIOUS PROTECTING CIVIL SERVANTS AND A*******s IN THE SO CALLED JUSTICE SYSTEM, BEHAVE WITH LIES, IN ORDER TO STUFF YOU ABOUT AND DENY YOU ANY SORT OF CLOSURE AND 'JUSTICE' ETC.

Corrupt Police & IPO-how they aided a crook. 71.

Throughout this blog I have recounted and just recently too, about the corrupt Judge Hobbs QC and how he behaved and that ruined my life too and how it was impossible for me to get justice against the ramifications of what he did. How I have tried to get newspapers into this story with no luck. Same again trying to find a lawyer to take out a prosecution on a no win no fee basis. Absoluely no one wanted to touch it  and all lied via various excuses etc.

 Just a few days ago it was reported that the Justice Secretary, Liz Truss, who had made it clear she does not like Judges much either and this especially so after the way they behaved over the Brexit issue when they showed their obvious bias with those two big hearings. Brought about by, I must say, a non Anglo Saxon Brit who made it her job to tell us real Brits how to run our country and get this; by using money she had made by us allowing her to make her good living here. How is that for a kick in our teeth?? (All the Judges denied they were biased even in the face, that the majority were known to be pro EU) Truss made an observation which got up the nose of their head Judge, a Judge Neuberger and he had his pennyworth about what he thought about her and her comments. Cheeky sod as he isn't elected and she is and she is free to say what she wants!! These Judge BASTARDS now think they really rule this country and not our elected Parliament as they are ALWAYS telling Parliament to change the laws they have made as they are unlawful etc and have overturned legal decisions made in courts. This especially to do with immigration matters. No coincidence there when their top Judge is of immigrant stock and so many are, in our justice system these days.  No BIAS THERE THEN !!??

Anyway this has shown me that she has an opinion that may help me. So I have just written to her briefly outlining what Judge Hobbs did to me in direct contravention of the law. How I have irrefutable evidence of that in the transcript of that hearing and how I have found trying to get justice about that, has shown me that there is AN IRON CURTAIN AROUND OUR JUDGES THAT MEANS YOU WILL NEVER EVER GET JUSTICE AGAINST ANY OF THEM. I asked her what she had to say about that. ESPECIALLY AS HER POLITICAL CLASSES ARE ALWAYS TELLING US PEASANTS HOW LUCKY WE ARE TO LIVE IN A DEMOCRACY AND UNDER THE RULE OF LAW...WHAT UTTER BULLSHIT AS THIS SHOWS.  Now the thing is, going on past experiences I doubt if I will EVER GET AN ANSWER, LET ALONE ANY HELP. PLACE YOUR BETS NOW! I will report on what if anything happens.

Corrupt Police & IPO-how they aided a crook. 70.

For those who haven't read all of this blog, IPO stands for Intellectual Property Office, which is a thoroughly corrupt British government department that robbed me of my Intellectual Property. It was what they did over a 10 year period that prompted me to start this blog. Their last act of sheer corruptness ended in 2010. All their corrupt acts over that 10 year period are listed in this blog and in the book I wrote about it all, which can be downloaded off this page.

So why do I bring this up again. Well over this holiday period I had much time on my hands, so decided to sort out all my boxes of files to do with those unsavoury 10 years. Get rid of files that no longer needed to be kept and sort out all the IPO files in date order etc. Of course I re-read some of them whilst doing this and it reminded me of just how ILLEGAL all those acts were and how the bastards got away with it.

In 2004 the first of SIX CORRUPT and ILLEGAL acts were committed. This was a hearing that my ex car agent brought about to make my legally gained Trade Mark registration of 'Viper' invalid. The Hearing Officer Reynolds ( a Judge or equivalent of) who works for the IPO and hears the arguments for and against, was so biased for my ex agent, it was untrue. It was very blatant and he decreed that my ex agent should also have registration of MY MARK. This despite not being shown any evidence that he had used that name BEFORE I had. I was accused of abandoning it even though I provided heaps of evidence that I had not and had continued without any break....all of course ignored by Reynolds. In fact my ex agent only ever used it  to describe or advertise MY PRODUCT as you would expect as my agent and then that started some two years after I had started my business and had begun using my mark. After being an agent for 3.5 years he then decided to steal it so he could say to Chrysler that he would sell it to them.  He had hoped to get £1/2M off them for it. He was thwarted by my fighting him for those 10 years as by then they'd lost interest, but in the early days they egged him by saying that if he got rid of me they would be interested. Typical Yank company !!

The worst was to come for I brought up the fact that evidence had been put into the hearing that was patently illegal. That was looked at after the hearing by another hearing officer (Landau) who found that my ex agent had no right to the mark. He was allowed to appeal this and at that hearing, I was kept out of it and that was a travesty of justice in itself, but what happened behind my back at that hearing was a blatant case of corruption and illegality that you couldn't make up, let alone believe the IPO would have the brass to commit. For their own law department boss (James) plus the Judge (Hobbs QC) both conspired to GIVE BUSBRIDGE MY EX AGENT ADVICE AND HELP AS TO HOW HE COULD CIRCUMVENT THE DECISION THAT HAD WRECKED HIS ILLEGAL AND CRIMINAL ACTS OF THEFT FROM ME, AND NO ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO CONDUCT THAT HEARING AS AN APPEAL HEARING. HE SHOULD HAVE MADE LEGAL ARGUMENTS AS TO HOW THE DECISION HE WAS APPEALING WAS WRONG. IN FACT HE HARDLY SAID A WORD. IT WAS ALL SPEECH BY HOBBS GIVING (ILLEGALLY) ADVICE.

Reading all that again sent me into another bout of my being 'RAGING MAD' (Hence the name of this blog) For despite my reporting that Judge to all the British Legal departments that one has to use in this corrupt country, they all protected that Judge. I even wrote to Ken Clarke (that utterly useless buffoon of a Tory Dickhead who I'd love to stick my fist into his stupid face every time he gets onto TV to spout his claptrap comments) and of course he did nothing. I also made a formal complaint to the CEO of the IPO and guess what.....ANOTHER WHITEWASH.

After this, Busbridge just carried out all the advice he'd corruptly and illegally been give by this Hobbs and James criminals and eventually in 2010 he was awarded my Trade Mark and it was taken off me, as if 'I had never owned it' Don't forget I had previously fought Chrysler and they had used Busbridge as their one and only witness. Yet with all their money and top legal help, they lost as I had proved beyond doubt that I was first to use it in the UK. So how was the IPO able to just take it off me with that statement 'As if I had never owned it' HOW CORRUPT AND ILLEGAL CAN YOU GET ???? Of course if I was rich, I could have taken it all away from those corrupt bastards in the IPO and to the High Court where maybe one could expect to get REAL INDEPENDENT JUDGES  TO SEE ALL THE ILLEGAL GOINGS ON, PREVIOUSLY.

Why do I keep all these files and evidence? Well the criminal acts committed by the IPO and my ex agent BUSBRIDGE ( who still carries on making and selling the car I designed and gave the mark of VIPER to) will never die with time. If I ever win the lottery or somehow be able to fund a legal challenge to all the above facts, then I will need those files etc. So they and the IPO should all pray every night that I never get to be able to do this, for if I do, the IPO will owe me a great deal of compensation for ruining my life and HOBBS, JAMES and BUSBRIDGE could end put with a criminal record.