I am raging mad...

Intellectual Property & Corrupt Government/Police cont.

2012-03-04T08:39:00.004-08:00

As I have said before these days there is hardly a day goes by when one is not hearing about corrupt and useless police and other civil servants. Now another tail reaches us about yet more corruption in the Police.
It concerns a bloke called Morgan who was an investigative journo and he was some 20-25 years ago murdered whilst he was investigating corruption in the Met (Where else, I ask?)Needless to say the Met conspired to make sure that their investigation of that was a shambles of ineptitude and incompetence etc. All no doubt quite deliberate so that the person who did the dirty deed would never be found. Seems screamingly obvious the Police had something to do with it all.
Now what enrages me in cases like this is the absolute non reaction of the Pollies (politicians). It is obvious that pollies are dead scared of the police and that is why they allow them to police themselves. For if you don't know they are absolutely untouchable and a law unto themselves and they know it and that is why they are dead cheeky by doing just whatever they want. Safe in the knowledge that no one will act against them. They can kill people with impunity at the worst and so smaller crimes are no problem for them.
Whilst my case was not a murder case, it too suffered from the fact that civil servants and the Police know they can do anything and get away with it. All the so called checks and balances we are smugly told by the pollies exist to protect us, is all BULLSHIT FOR ALL THE OMBUDSMEN AND OTHER SUCH BODIES LIKE THE IPCC ARE JUST A CON ON THE PUBLIC. As are certain laws like the Data Protection Act and the Freedom of Information Act. For you try to get to see documents that you know exist, that if you could get a hold of them, you would be able to prove chicanery and corruption.
In my case after I asked the Dorset Police & the met Police to investigate Busbridges perjury etc, the first thing they did is go running to the IPO to have a good old chinwag about that asshole Cook who is giving us all this trouble. Of course between them, they colluded to hide everything and not do anything. In the course of that, I know that emails, faxes phonecalls and letters went between the IPO and corrupt Police.
If you read the story you will know that I got hold of two of them because the dunce copper in the Bournemouth Police who I was trying to get investigate things, he inadvertently left them in my dossier when he gave it back to me. That led me to go on a concerted search to force the bastard IPO and the Police give up copies of all documents that went between them all and in which I was featured.
I need not tell you what the outcome of that fruitless exercise was----ZILCH, in effect. You would not believe the lengths they went to to deny documents existed,and to dredge up excuses they said enabled them to ignore the Acts. Even when I proved a document existed because they had said so, they still denied it. So I went to one of the con merchant Ombudsmen, the Information Commissioner and complained about it all.
You will see all the documents about this attached to this blog if you look. The nett effect was that even though the ICO got the IPO to cough up some documents, they amounted to nothing as most were documents that I already had and or were not to do with communications between the IPO and the Police. In the case of the two Police Forces absolutely nothing came out of my efforts and THAT IS BECAUSE THE POLICE ARE A LAW UNTO THEMSELVES AND THEY CAN IGNORE WHATEVER THEY WANT AND NO ONE DOES A THING. CERTAINLY NOT OUR USELESS POLLIES.I EVEN TOOK IT TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND HE TOO DIDN'T DO A THING.
So when I read about murders almost certainly done or commissioned by our police, I know that it will go nowhere. In the Morgan case there have been FIVE Court cases and all including the last one last year have collapsed thanks to the deviousness of the Police. I think it was the Judge or maybe another journo who has insisted that now there must be an Independent Review of the whole mess. What do the Pollies say?
Well they are thinking about it......DON'T HOLD YOUR BREATH FOLKS AS THEY WILL DO ABSOLUTELY NOWT, AND THE BASTARDS IN THE POLICE WILL GET AWAY WITH MURDER YET AGAIN.

Intellectual Property & Corrupt Government/Police

2012-02-27T12:37:00.004-08:00

Now that the Leveson enquiry has reached the point where a top woman Police Officer has just reported facts that I have been saying in this blog for three years now; that all government departments are steeped in corruption because too many of its officials have been up to their necks in corrupt practices. Mainly by taking back handers from the media and others.
Well tell us something new is what I say. Of course in my case they have been corrupt in that way, I am sure, and in other ways which I have highlighted in this blog and my book, over and over again. Now this is all out in the open I feel that I must now put forward my own ideas that I have had for a long time, as to just how the IPO have been corrupt over the 20 year history with them.
So here is what I feel is a real and feasible explanation as to why they acted against me and went to the ends of the earth to see me stripped of my IP in the Trade Mark Viper, I so obviously and legally owned. One has to go back to the beginning of my blog and see how things started off. The reason Busbridge tried to prove he owned my Mark Viper, was simply because he found out that Chrysler wanted to register that mark for itself, starting with their application to register it in Jan 1990. They did not realise that I had been using it since Jan 1986 and therefore had prior usage and the first claim to it, but I had not registered or applied to register it. However this did not negate my rights to it and Chrysler simply did not do their homework and search everywhere as to if someone else was using it. Or they thought they were so powerful they could brush aside people like me.
I feel that when Busbridge contacted them, it is entirely possible that they then did do some exploring of the UK car trade and if so, they would have seen straight away that I had a powerful claim to it and that Busbrdige DID NOT. He was unable to produce ANY evidence that he had used it IN ANY WAY prior to Feb/March 1988 when I licensed him to use my mark as my London agent.
I believe that they then decided that the easiest way to get rid of me was to use Busbridge to smear my name with accusations that I had committed forgery when I produced a copy of the license I gave Busbridge in 1989 a proof that any claims he was making that he owned the mark were a lie and completely false. He of course colluded with them over this.
One also has to take into consideration that Chrysler are obviously an American company and so many such companies are thoroughly corrupt and will do anything to get their own way. Understand this if you will; they had made their Viper sports car in the States and then they decided to sell it in Europe. No American company would do that if they did not expect to be able to sell many Vipers. They would not have taken such steps to just sell a few and to be able sell they would need to register the Mark Viper in ALL the European countries. In all the countries in Europe they would meet no resistance to doing this as no one else was using the mark there. In the UK they met resistance from Busbridge in the first instance and then me when I found out what he and they were up to.
I believe that they thought that if they first of all got rid of me with the help of Busbridge, then they would have no trouble to get rid of him as he was standing on quicksands as he could show no evidence that would be accepted as real proof as to his bona-fide ownership. To do this they had to get my opposition to them registering the Mark, heard first.
The trouble for them was, that I believe that the IPO should have actually given Busbridge first shot at opposing their application, as he applied before me to oppose them. Now the thing was they did not do that but gave ME first shot and the hearing in 1995 was held with them using Busbridge as their supposed witness against me and using these false allegations of forgery. Why did this happen in this order, one has to ask?
So the most likely way they did this was through the London based Intellectual lawyers that Chryslers were using at that time. Throughout all the time I have been involved in this thoroughly corrupt tale I have seen that many intellectual property law companies are up to their necks in it with the IPO. I do not believe that when you have a situation were lawyers are in constant contact with such a governmental organisation as the IPO, that they are not going to make cosy alliances and arrangements with the IPO. This so that cases can be conducted in an easy alliance in such a way as can only be done in such a place like England. Let us not forget that we are dealing here with the UK Establishment, with its Public schoolboy set and their "you scratch my back and I will scratch yours" and all that kind of stuff. IP lawyers will want an easy life and so will the civil servant lot in the IPO, who in the top ranks will have similar backgrounds to their lawyer buddies in the law firms.
So I believe that Chrysler will have told their lawyers to fix it so that someone high up in the IPO makes sure that the rules are bent in Chryslers favour. WHAT OTHER EXPLANATION IS THERE FOR THE IPO TO HAVE PUT ME IN FIRST TO OPPOSE CHRYSLER WHEN BUSBRIDGE SHOULD HAVE BEEN OPPOSING THEM FIRST????
However to get the IPO to direct me to have my opposition application heard first is against their own rules as the first application should be heard first, but had that happened it would have almost certainly failed for Busbridge for as I have said he had no case. He would have then been cast out of the way for good and then Chrsylers would still have had to deal with my bona-fide application with its strong irrefutable evidence of first usage of the mark.
If you read all the evidence of what has gone on since that first fateful opposition hearing you will see time and again that the IPO and its corrupt officials have taken steps to thwart me. Breaking the rules again and again. The only possible explanation for the perplexing questions of; "why did the IPO make all these corrupt actions just to make sure I had my registration taken away from me after I had gained registration"
You may say "well you did gain registration and so how did that happen of the IPO was so corrupt and in the pay of Chrsyler?" Well you see that hearing which Chrysler thought they had in the bag, actually went against them. I believe that the hearing officer who heard that case in 1995 was not obeying orders to find against me and that put the cat amongst the pigeons. ( you might say he was an incorruptible civil servant) Why do I think this is what happened? Well you have to look at a few remarks that have slipped out along the way and have been made by IPO officials. Like the remark that was made by Judge Hobbs to Busbridge in his later hearing where he colluded with the IPO head manager, a Mr James, to swing that hearing totally in Busbridges favour, give him all the corrupt help and ideas as to how he should proceed so that the IPO could then swing things around and back to his favour and enable him to proceed and complete his stealing of my trade mark. He (Hobbs)alluded the the travesty of that hearing of mine against Chrysler, in 1995 and what he really meant was that it had not gone the way that Chrysler and the IPO had wanted it to. The hearing Hobbs heard, you will see if you have read all this blog or my book was heard beacuse another straight hearing officer actually, at yet another hearing found for me a pointed out that Busbrdige had no rights to the mark and for several reasons. So Busbridge had to appeal this or get knocked out completely AND the IPO just had to find reasons and ways in which to correct matters for them and Chrysler. They set this hearing up with a thoroughly in their pocket Judge,to advise Busbrdige how he could take steps to circumvent the previous judgement that he lost and thus get back on track and that way the IPO could swing things their way and for him and Chrysler. Thus getting rid of me at last.
Because of that cock of me winning the 1995 opposition hearing against Chrysler, the IPO had to go through the motions of giving me registration and then find reasons to take it back off me. (you will have to read all the history to see how all that was done and why.) I believe that someone high up was paid a back hander and it could have been more than one person that was paid off by Chrsyler, no doubt through their lawyer, and this too meant that all those implicated would be scared shitless that they would be found out. That would mean that it was imperative that they destroyed me and my business, so as to get rid of me. You can see that this was on their minds by the remarks the hearing officer made in that last hearing in 2010 when they completed their dirty deeds and against all the overwhelming evidence against them and Busbridge....and stripped me of my legally registered trade mark.
You can also see how the IPO have worked to stop me getting Justice when they colluded with the thoroughly corrupt Met Police to block my attempts to get the Met to investigate the forgery and perjury of Busbridge at ALL the 8 hearings that took place and the Trial I had to undergo in 2000.
You may say that I am dreaming and making all this up and these kind of things just do not go on. If you think that, then it is you who is the dreamer who simply is not living on this planet. For now it is all out and quite clear just what goes on with all the rotten corrupt civil servants, the Police and especially the Met Police, who have been taking bribes for years off the media and others. If they are capable of doing that, then a simple case of taking back handers off another corrupt American global company who will do anything for the bottom Dollar, is complete chicken feed and VERY probable. For the facts of this case contains so many FACTS that are inexplicable and can only be explained by something having gone on in such a way as I have outlined above and in my book "Justice Denied" and other places in this blog.

In the last few days we have seen yet another example of how the Establishment treats British citizens. I talk about Chris Tappin who is yet another person, mostly men who's plight has been ignored by the British politicians. This man is another person said by the US to have committed a crime, when it is painly obvious that he has merely acted as any transport company would have done when it handled goods being moved on behalf of a customer. How would he know what were the true significance of the goods. On top of that he is being set up by the US in a sting.
Our weak corrupt and vacillating politicians and so called 'justice' stooges, just stand by and let him get taken to the USA and into one of their stinking hell hole prisons, for God knows how long.
What it means is that if you are British, your own government cares not a jot about your rights and will let you down everytime. I mean if they can do to me what they have done, then what they have done to Tappin is only par for the course. Cameron took no notice of Tappin when he appealed to him, did not even reply to his entreaties. Just like he did with me!! So much for Cameron.

Intellectual Property & Corrupt Police

2012-02-13T14:54:00.000-08:00

I hope readers can see why I keep on about our Police, for in our media for weeks or even months now, we are seeing story after story of Police incompetence and corruption etc. We get EIGHT S.Wales cops who stitched up three guys for a murder they never did. Then one of their mob loses evidence causing the case against those corrupt bastards to collapse and they get off. We have Met officers taking back handers for giving newspapers all sorts of inside info, so stories can be written. Now those same coppers are arresting the journo's for having paid those back handers. You couldn't make it up and these are only two stories I have commentated on.
Why do I get so pissed off about the Police. For those with no brains so they can see why, I will elucidate for you; It is bad enough that we have so many civil servants who are incompetent and corrupt and refuse at tribunals to deal with perjury and forgery, but we the Public should be able to rely on our Police so we can go to them with all the evidence that crimes have been committed and they actually investigate your evidence. Instead they work with the very people that have caused me to go to the Police and then they block any investigation.....that is CORRUPT! I mean if the Police are capable of doing what they have done as above, treating me the way they have is small change because it is clear they are capable of the highest orders of criminality and corruption.
Today we hear about another corrupt cop, that Iranian, called Dezai. Well of course he being an immigrant wouldn't stand a chance against those in the Met who are unmitigated hypocritical racists and always have been. Yet these same hypocrites have arrested and charged Terry for alleged racism. What assholes.
Then we have the same Dezai who has just been done again for perverting the course of Justice, but then he is a well known person, as I have commented on in the above posts in that only well known persons get charged with perjury and perverting justice. Unknowns like Busbridge can go into courts and lie their heads off hundreds of times and they get away with it.
We have on this subject a Sunday Times reporter one Martin Ivens stating last Sunday that we cannot have any perverting of the course of justice, when he was writing about yet another well known person (that obnoxious insane twat, the Liberal nutter Huhne) recently charged with this crime. Yet I guaranty that if I write to him and ask why it is that he doesn't write about all the cases of blatant perjury which non well known people commit in Courts with monotonous regularity, he will not even acknowledge my letter or email, let alone look into my case or write about it.
In the last week I have unfortunately been involved in two RTC's (on the same day) and of course the wretched police have been involved. However once again I see evidence of just how they and their system is not fit for purpose. One guy is just about OK on one of the RTC's but the other is hopeless. A week later I haven't even been interviewed and when he has rung me (and only then because I complained at not hearing anything) he has refused to give me the full details of the other driver or his insurance details, but he has also refused to give me the details of my witness so I can contact her and give her details to my solicitor. Now, had I been in a position on both occassions to actually speak with the drivers and my witnesses, I would have got this info off them, yet I am now denied it. In both cases I was injured and not able to do this. So a week later no one is charged, despite injuries being suffered, and in both accidents I could have been killed. So they were serious RTC's and not ones that should be treated slowly and slackly. But then we are talking once again about 'our wonderful Police??'

Intellectual Property & Ken Clarke again.

2012-02-12T10:08:00.000-08:00

I see my best mate, that fat, scruffy, bumbling oaf, Kenny boy, is at it again!He's having his say again over him wanting to do away with juries. Now get this folks, for he wants this to happen in CIVIL ACTIONS especially when down trodden people like me who can actually afford to take the bastards in government to court for the oppressive actions they have heaped upon the person. He even wants evidence that would normally have been put forward showing the government and its civil servants culpability, to be hidden and not brought into the case.
You have to believe that this country is steadily slipping into a state, no better than Russia, or Nazi Germany or any good old dictatorship. The man wants locking away. He should have been retired years ago and Cameron is as bad as him as he will not stand up to him as he is no more than a toffee-nosed,ex Public schoolboy, weak twit. Or as Thatcher used to call them....'A WET'
If this had happened in my trial for forgery, and it had been left to another toffee-nosed twit....the Judge....I would have got jail. And if I had the money to be able to take the IPO and the MET to Court, I would obviously lose too.

CORRUPT MET POLICE.....AGAIN. I see the Met are busy arresting people in the media for having paid .....YES....BENT COPPERS.... for giving them leaks. It seems that the media do not find this ironic, that bent copper stake money off the media and now those same bent coppers are hurrying around arresting those that paid them. YET ABSOLUTELY NO SIGN THAT ANY BENT COPPERS ARE BEING ARRESTED.

WE LIVE IN A MAD AND ABSOLUTELY BARMY COUNTRY, and the peasants are so lazy,apathetic and ignorant of what is going on, that these bastards get away with it.

Intellectual Property & Hypocracy of Establishment

2012-02-03T09:28:00.000-08:00

The current nauseating never ending media attention of Huhne and Sheridan over their perjury and perverting the course of justice make me once more 'Raging Mad' For these are the very things that make me so, hence the name of this blog.
As I alluded to in my last post, when well known people who commit perjury the media are all over the case when it gets known. The British Establishment then knows that the eyes of the media and therefore of the general British Public, are watching to see what happens. They then know that they must be seen to do something about it. Now the hypocracy comes in because when you are not well known like myself, if you are on the receiving end of an injustice performed against you via perjury and therefore perverting the course of justice by that very perjury (and in my case forgery as well), you will be totally ignored.....for you ARE MERELY ONE OF THE MANY PEASANTS OF THIS COUNTRY AND OF COURSE WE DO NOT MATTER!!
The excrable media are only interested in selling papers and they think that they can only sell papers if they constanlty indulge in outing as many well known people about all manner of trivia connected to them. Hence why they act like packs fo wolves following these well known creatures around or hacking into their phones etc.
Peasants are of no interest to them anymore. We can be downtrodden by the government in any manner you can think of, but our stories of injustices are not news worthy or interest to the media on the basis we will not help to sell papers. TRUE INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM FOR THE GOOD OF THE COUNTRY AND ITS PEOPLES IS DEAD!
I heard some pompous asshole from some department of government saying how the perjury etc of Huhne had to be dealt with BECAUSE IT ABSOLUTELY UNDERMINES THE JUDICIAL PROCESS AND THE COUNTRIESFAITH IN THAT. What a load of shite for if that is truly so and it has to be dealt with pronto, why wasn't the perversion of justice as committed BY MR LIAR BUSBRIDGE, COMMITTED SO HE COULD STEAL MY BUSINESS AND ALL MY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, ALSO DEALT WITH PRONTO WHEN I REPORTED IT TO THE IPO AND THE BUNCH OF PERVERTED CROOKS THEY CALL THE MET POLICE????????????
ANSWER ME THAT MR CAMERON OR MR KEN CLARKE OR MR HARMER !!!!!!!!

Intellectual Property & Perjury

2012-01-31T08:41:00.000-08:00

I see that one of the few people I have ever read that he got done for perjury and actually got a prison sentence, One Tommy Sheriden of Scottyland, if you remember his case, is now out of clink. He got 3 years and yet after only a third of that he's out. makes you wonder why in this stupid country of ours we bother putting anyone in clink as they are only in there 5 minutes then they are out again to carry on their wicked ways, liking killing people etc.
Not that our Tommy, he of dubious sexual peculiarities along with his missus, will be doing anything that bad except maybe some more of our mate Busbridges predilections of lying through his back teeth and even when in Court. In Tommy's case he got done simply because he was a well known character who the Establishment did not particularly like, so they decided to make an example. After all they could not have well known characters making a fool of our stupid Judges. Yet when it comes to common unknown liars and criminals like Busbridge, who no one has ever heard about nor his over 200 blatant cases of lying in Court nor his 5 cases of forged documents presented to Courts, well we cannot let him get away with that. In other words it is yet another case of double standards and hypocrisy that the Brit Establishment is so good at. The peasants can go fuck themselves if they want to enjoy being able to see and get JUSTICE for that is a commodity reserved for the RICH and the ESTABLISHMENT.

Whilst reading the fatuous comment made by yet another Anon it occurred to me that many of those who may read this blog have not cottoned onto exactly why I write this blog. Well there are a number of reasons but one of them is that I am trying to provoke certain people and organisations. Has no one got the brains to see, for instance, that I have slagged off in no uncertain terms a number of people including the execrable Busbridge. I have called them for what they are and told everybody of the things they have done. Now if what I have said many times about all these bastards wasn't true, then why is it that none of them has gone for me for slander etc?
It shows me that they all know that what I have said is the gospel truth and if they did go for me and I ended up in any Court, I would easily be able to show it was the truth. SO THEIR SILENCE SPEAKS VOLUMES FOR THEIR CRIMINALITY AND MISDEEDS. I would like nothing more than to get these despicable assholes into a court so I can expose them and force the authorities who have let me down again and again into recompense. However we all know the cowards will shrink away from all that.

Intellectual Property & useless Police-AGAIN

2012-01-29T04:16:00.000-08:00

As I have said before these days there is hardly a day goes by when one doesn't see examples about the oafs in our useless police forces and how they utterly let us all down. This week it was back to those EIGHT corrupt Welsh coppers who stitched up THREE innocent blokes for a murder they did not do. Of course the corrupt bastards went and hid the evidence that would have put them away. Then some Establishment twerp of a Judge leaps on that to throw out the case. Any slightest excuse and the Establishment will leap to halt any attempt to bring our useless corrupt police to book. This because we simply cannot have the peasants see that they have a useless and corrupt police force or anyone else in the ruling classes empire. After all the Brit peasant is a naive, lazy and trusting, ill educated oaf, who blindly believes all the shit they are fed with and will not rebel. However they may just rise up and have a revolution so it must all be swept under the carpet.
Anyway miraculously this evidence that had been thought to have been mysteriously destroyed, turns up in a box held by no less than the South Wales Police Force. Anyone with half a brain can see they cynically hid it so that the case would collapse and all their mates would get off as they cannot be tried twice. So it seems as this will be the case and will the great British public riot about it or even say that much about this horrendous miscarriage of justice, the worst in history? They could raise a cry, say on the same level as they are, about Hesters bonus. But then they raise a hullabaloo about that because it all comes down to their own greed about money as it is not right that he should have so much money and they do not. In other words when it comes to how much money they have or do not have, or something to do with money over their houses and how much they may lose on them, Oh yes they will get worked up. Anything else is just too much effort to have a revolution about. So these miscarriages of justice go on and on and the establisment get away with it and they know they can get away with it, so that raises their arrogance and bravado to go on thieving off us and stitching us up as they know we are too lazy and thick to stop them.
Now I think I have mentioned that I was in the Forces for 8 years, so I have a great deal of sympathy and respect for most of those in the Forces. Of course some of the officers belong to the dreaded English upper classes and I never liked any of them. However there are officers in there who belong to a 'gold class' This week we learn that the establisment useless civil servants in the MOD ( a government department I revile as much as the IPO) have been sacking servicemen yet not one MOD civil servant has lost his job in the cut backs. I would myself sack half of all the civil service and we would save all that money and notice no difference in how things are run. After all they couldn't possibly run them worse than they do now. I would whip the rest that were left and warn them that if they did not start working for a change they too would get the BOOT. (preferably a nice heavy Army studded boot and right in their chops).
One of those gold plated officers, one Tim Collins has come out with a statement about our wonderful copper officers that I full endorse and have always thought myself. He says that 'mediocre' officers move up the ranks without cutting crime. They are, he said "crippled by a 'do nothing' culture with too many crimes being brushed under the carpet by officers unwilling to investigate them" He goes onto say that "We have top social workers running the police forces, we need to retire them" Does this sound familiar? Of course it does because this is EXACTLY WHAT HAS HAPPENED IN MY CASE. And that big mouth new Met Commissioner falls into that category. Mouthing off about what he thought, so he would appear to be a great candidate and thus get the cushy top job, then fail to keep to his word and allow people like myself to insist that the crimes I reported be investigated. Not to mention his ignorance in not replying to my direct letter to him about my case and that he should show that he meant what he said and get it investigated.

Intellectual Property - The Ruling classes & Police

2012-01-24T12:38:00.000-08:00

What have the ruling classes got to do with my case of injustice? Well the injustices heaped upon me where all done by the ruling classes in the form of politicians, civil servants and members of the judiciary and their judicial system.
However I count in amongst all those members of the media. Whilst strictly, you could say they are not in the ruling classes, I think their is an argument that one could use in that they are and can be responsible for how things run in this country.
They have immense power to shape things and this has been seen in recent months over the hacking scandal etc.
Now what have they to do with my case and its story. Well up to now I have restrained myself from recounting how I have tried to get the media interested in my story and case. (I DID NOT WANT TO PISS THEM OFF) After my last line of attack was thwarted when the Met Police, after corruptly conniving with their fellow civil servants in the IPO and thus refused to investigate and deal with my huge dossier of evidence I gave them.(You should note here that I come from a POLICE family on my Fathers and Grandfathers side and I was myself in the RAF Police, so it goes without saying I KNOW FULL WELL HOW TO COLLATE EVIDENCE AND PRESENT IT) Even refusing to interview me so I could explain what it was all about and the meaning of all the evidence within it. The Met investigating officer remember, told me he couldn't understand any of it. (typical of all those thick plonker plods!!)
So who could I turn to now? I could go to various Ombudsmen and to various Ministers responsible for the departments that were involved in the case, all of whom were not fit for purpose and had wrecked my attempts to gain justice. Needless to say none of them would lift a finger, but I did not really think they would....the assholes, for they were just as culpable for allowing their departments to fail me and knowing politicians the last thing they want to do, the cowards, is admit any sort of responsibility for any failings of departments under their supposed control. That is just par for the course for all politicians.
Who else could I turn to? Well I turned to many legal firms who had IP departments to whom I sent a copy of my book together with a letter of explanation as to what I hoped from them. IE; maybe just one of those overpaid assholes may have a conscience and see just how badly the system they were part of had shat on me. You know not one of them even sent a letter of acknowledgement of receipt, let alone offered to help in any way. I believe I have such a good case against the IPO for one, that I should be able to get legal aid for such an important case or at least for a lawyer to do it probono or get insurance for the case. I have to now believe that they are all unwilling to take on their fellow Establishment types on or blot their copy book with the almighty IPO.(who they must bow down to and treat as Gods) However they all belong 'the ruling class' types I mention above. Certainly non of them have any manners even though all of them will have had a top education with many having gone to private schools. So much for those schools teaching them how to behave with good manners and how to treat their fellow man, especially when being asked to help.
So that meant I only had the press to turn to. I wrote to EVERY mainstream newspaper, every TV current affairs programme, every investigative TV programme and it was all the same. Not one of them bothered to answer, even to just knock me back.
It is back to the ruling classes section of society again and their lack of integrity or manners or feeling for the downtrodden masses.(of which there are many in this Godforsaken hole of ours) Except when it suits them.
Maybe non of them had to guts to take on a lot of the Establishment who were up to their necks in this story. For let us not forget that not only was a corrupt JUDGE
involved, but so were many MP's, Ministers, and the Prime Minister too. For I wrote to Cameron as well and again got no answer. Even the Attorney General and that fat, scruffy, bumbling, stuttering, idiot twat, Ken Clarke was involved. He refused to investigate the corrupt Judge even though the evidence was overwhelming. (See the transcript of the hearing in 2005 as can be seen on this blog).
You would think that the press would be all over a story like this, especially when they twitter on non stop about how we need to get businesses up and running to save the country and what about their stories about how IP is being stolen off singers, artists and the like. Who but an idiot would want to risk their money starting a business like I did with all their life savings, invent products that had IP attached and then have the corrupt IPO give it all away to a bloody conman??? However, again not one newspaper Editor or investigative journo even bothered to write back and acknowledge receipt of my letter and in some cases the book was included. (which had cost me money and heaps of time to collate and write, which would have been obvious to any decent person)
So please forgive me when I say I have not one ounce of faith in any one in the UK and I am bitterly disappointed that I was born British, for I believe we now live in a country that stinks to high heaven. Politicians and their civil servants are an absolute shower and nothing they have their finger in, works any more. The country is in a complete and utter mess because of them all and how I have been treated is par for the course. I know I am not the only one either who has been shat on by the Establishment and the Police, but as so many Brits are too nice to complain, they make it hard for people like me because of my background, I will and have complained. I have not pulled any punches and have said it how it is and how I really feel and of course I know many Brits do not like people like me for it is not British to speak so like this. We should keep a stiff upper lip and take it all in silence, these oafs think. Well bugger that I say. It is because of people who think like that, that we are in the mess we are in, because it allows the establishment oafs and idiots and the downright criminal, to get away with it and people like me get vilified and we are therefore pissing in the wind. But at least I have said what I think and that is worth something to me, if nothing else.

NOW BACK TO MY VERY FAVOURITE SUBJECT....OUR CORRUPT POLICE AND THE MET IN PARTICULAR....
Today I hear on the TV news that the MET knew full well that Milly Dowlers phone was being hacked into, yet they did didly shit about it even though they knew it was illegal. Now why did they do that you may well ask? No one in the media including TV, has the guts to come out with the reason. Well I will tell you. So many coppers had their fingers right up the bums of hacks, being paid God knows how much for leaking stories to them, that none of them was going to rock the boat by investigating the hacks. WOULD THEY???...so why don't the TV Wallahs say so. NO DOUBT THEY TOO ARE UPTO THEIR EYEBALLS IN SHIT ALONG WITH THE PRESS!!

THIS IS THE WONDERFUL COUNTRY WE ALL LIVE IN TODAY...IT'S AS ROTTEN AS YOU COULD GET.
ONLY AMERICA CAN BEATS US OR MAYBE ITALY OR GREECE?? WHO WINS THE CUP ON THIS??

Intellectual Property & More on Police

2012-01-08T07:11:00.000-08:00

You may think I have something against the Police....You are damn right I do for both they and the IPO have perverted the course of Justice to deny me JUSTICE and there is not a day goes by that I do not get reminded of this when I open a newspaper or watch the news on TV. These past two weeks have been no acception.
Firstly I read that it is a fact that at least going on 1,000 coppers have criminal records yet are still serving in the police. How about that and what did I say a few posts back? ALL COPPERS ARE CRIMINALS AND YOBS IN UNIFORM. In fact one newspaper headline actually stated that so I am not the only one in thinking this.
Also over the past two weeks we have been bombarded relentlessly re the Stephen Lawrence case. This raises many obvious facts with me over Police attitudes and their comments about this case. This new Met Commissioner Bernard Hogan Howe said "the public can have confidence now that the Met will investigate crimes" (refer to my comments he made in a recent post about how he thought all members of the Public should be able to insist that the Police investigate their complaints that a crime has been committed and be able to make the Police investigate. Yet when I wrote to him to insist he makes his force investigate the crimes of Busbridge...he does'nt even reply. What a hypocrite.
In this instance he is trying it on again by meaning that the Met isn't as racist as it was when the Lawrence murder was committed. WHO IS HE TRYING TO FOOL HERE?? The Met police officers are not only yobs and criminals in uniform and were then and ARE STILL THAT WAY NOW!! NOTHING HAS CHANGED AT ALL. Just like you will NEVER stop the yobs in the UK on the football terraces shouting out racists remarks to coloured players, you will NEVER stop the Neantherdal Coppers of our police forces to behave in a more civilised way, as they are all Neantherdal Yobs in uniform. All that has happened in recent years is that the white UK Brits are more careful when and to whom they make their remarks to, about how they do not like coloured immigrants.
One also has to ask why it is that the Met and other Police Forces in the UK have a two tiered approach to how they deal with complaints from on the one hand white Brits and on the other hand coloured Brits or immigrants. You can also count the media in this too.
This Lawrence case and the recent case of an Indian studying here who was murdered in Manchester by a white yob. After the hoo hah about how the useless and racists Met first dealt with the Lawrence murder and they realised they had to appear to now make an effort over making amends. So now we have the exact opposite and they are acting in ways that they would never do if it had been a white man that had been killed even if it had been by coloured men, so also a racist act. Can you remember any case where white people who have been killed by coloureds in the UK getting the media attention in such a constant and heavy way or having the police acting as they have in recent days as with this Lawrence case?? Or sending not one but two coppers to the other side of the World to commiserate with the parents as they did over this recent student murder? I cabn remember many cases of white UK people being murdered in foreign countries merely because they were white and British yet the media nor the Police worked themselves up into a frenzy, let alone coppers rushing off to foreign places to investigate or definitely not foreign coppers coming over here to commiserate with grieving white parents.
It all amounts to hypocracy, double standards, pandering to the press and to what they fear the Public may think about them. But when it comes to dealing with crimes committed against whites in this country as in my case, they do not want to know, and go out of their way to do anything but investigate. I know my compaints were not about murder but I think I may have been treated better had I been say, BLACK??
Then you have the Human Rights lot with their HUGE INDUSTRY for protecting the rights of immigrants, mostly coloured. Now in my case my Human Rights were trashed
because the Human Rights Act states that everyone has a right to a fair trial or in my case, 'hearings' in tribunal courts. That I certainly did not get, yet I could find not one lawyer willing to take my case on as I was not a coloured immigrant. They all said they only took on HR cases to do with immigration>So in my case and others like me, we get our rights trashed by this government and their civil servants, but we can whistle for OUR RIGHTS!!

COMMENT MADE ON ONE OF MY POSTS MADE IN NOVEMBER; I only saw this a few days ago and the person who did not have the guts to name himself, asked why it was that I thought that civil servants had sided with Busbridge?
Well one has to say this is the kind of thing you get with so many people these days, especially from those people who read blogs and twitter, facebook etc. In fact it is my opinion that few people under the age of 50, these days have much intelligence due to our lack of good education people get and the relentless crap they get indoctrinated with. If this person had read all of this blog, had the intelligence to see and understand what was in it AND read all the documents of evidence attached, they would see why I know that the IPO sided with Busbridge. They only had to read the statements made by the hearing officer in the 2004 hearing when
I was defending my trade mark and trying to stop Busbridge stealing it. The way ALL my documents of evidence were trashed by him. yet none of Busbridges rubbish so called evidence was treated the same way. Bias was so obvious.
Then he should have read the transcript of the 2005 hearing heard by a so called independent Judge Hobbs where he would have seen obvious bias and corrupt actions where both the IPO in the form of their MR James and this Judge HOBBS conspired to corruptly help Busbridge pervert the course of justice and steal my registered mark. Then all the following actions from then on show extreme bias against me by the IPO, the Police and the many civil service departments when I have tried to obtain JUSTICE.
I CAN ONLY BELIEVE THAT THIS PERSON MUST HAVE BEEN A CIVIL SERVANT HIMSELF (OR HERSELF)

Intellectual Property & the British Justice system.

2011-12-23T01:45:00.000-08:00

Regular readers of this blog will know what I think about the British justice system. However I am going to reiterate my disgust of it and give you some recent examples of how useless it is. We are always hearing some jumped up politician or civil servant telling us how wonderful the justice system is in this country. Of course they have to say this don't they for to say otherwise would give the game away. However for those of us who have been on the receiving end of it will know full well just how inconsistent and incompetent it is. Even to the point of corruption as in my case where the IPO have obviously and deliberately decided to take away my Trade Mark registration after I had proved I owned it and they registered it.(and to give it to an obvious conman) To do this they embarked on many avenues that amount to corruption and that included a JUDGE working for them who behaved in a hearing in a constant and corrupt way. (The evidence for that can be seen on this blog amongst all the documents I show and which includes the transcript of that hearing)However I digress.
Recently we have seen that The Police and the CPS have been willing to charge John Terry with being racist because he has been said to have made racist remarks on the pitch. What a momentous crime we have here. It is Earth Shattering and so heinous that the full force of the British Justice system has been engaged and brought down upon him. The Met Police, that wonderful body of utter assholes, has been mobilised to spend considerable public money to 'investigate' this, as has the CPS. So now we will have the public show of how good and just our system of justice is. On the other hand that same system could not be arsed to investigate over 200 instances of deliberate perjury and 5 cases of forgery, carried out in British Courts with the deliberate intention to deceive the Courts and win a case for the perpetrator. No Sir, that isn't as bad as calling some person......whatever it was Terry was supposed to have said. Doesn't it just make you wonder what planet these assholes in the justice system, live on.
Then we also have the recent case where some young 29 year old dickhead who is on jury service, invents a lie to the court for not turning up one day by saying he is sick. The case has to be adjourned etc. He actually wants to go to a show in London with his MUM!! He is found out and the Judge gives him 14 days in a youth detention centre or such like. I am listening to comments on this on the Jeremy Vine show and am once again struck by how arrogant and stupid the British people are because some person from the justice system was waffling on about how this lad had to be dealt with in this way as it was 'CONTEMPT OF COURT' !! and of course we cannot have that... can we?? What would people think if we let everyone behave towards our wonderful courts and the system ?? Lying to Court we were told, was practically a hanging matter, which brought the Courts into disrepute if it wasn't dealt with severely!! EXCUSE ME YOU RAVING DICKHEAD, what was Busbridge doing everytime he stepped into the IPO courts and lied through the top of his head everytime he spoke? Not to mention the forged documents he showed in his evidence and the perjury and forgery he indulged in when he went to the Met Police and had me arrested on 'PERJURY AND FORGERY' no less, all based on his forgery and perjury which he used to get the Met and the CPS to act against me....which they did with alacrity. I win easily because we prove to the Court he was a liar yet what did that Court do....nothing it was the jury (thankfully)found me not guilty. Yet when I prove to the Met and the IPO all his perjury and forgery that he committed, NO ONE WANTS TO KNOW! It suddenly becomes of no importance that Busbsridge committed serial acts of CONTEMPT OF COURT, which is what he did and in doing so he committed a far bigger act of contempt of court than this idiot lad did.
The inconsistency and stupidity of the ruling classes in the country want to make me weep in frustration and rage at the corruption of it all. This lad made a fool of them, yet Busbridge even though he too made a fool of them all, for some reason best known to them, the people involved in the IPO, decided somewhere along the line that they would side with a conman in order to deprive me of what was legally mine and remember they had even previously decided that it was legally mine.
This sort of thing happens all the time in this rotten country and unless you are rich, or of course belong to the ruling classes, you cannot do a thing about it for the rich and the bastards in power have it all their way.

Intellectual Property & the IPO

2011-12-15T15:37:00.000-08:00

The IPO or Intellectual Property Office which is yet another governmental body of asshole civil servants who are never wrong and who have things so well wrapped up that no one member of the British Public (apart from rich ones)can ever get Justice against, when these bastards decide they are going to do you over.
This is what this whole blog is about (in case you haven't been reading it from the start in 2008). They of course decided for reasons best known to them that they would allow a conman to steal all my IP, thus ruining my whole life. (as outlined in this blog).
Now, on idly searching the web under "Complaints against the IPO" I could see website after website set up by these assholes. ( I make no apology for calling them assholes, either)Amongst the many websites they show are some that highlight that if one is not happy with the IPO, there are procedures by which one can make complaints about them. Seeing that you would think that this is all very fair and you will be safe.
Let me tell you the truth. I have used these so called safe guards many times and they are a con on the Public. They are a set up and designed to go through all the motions that a complaints procedure is being carried out, but the outcome is predetermined against you ever winning. No Sir!! I have even complained to their CEO's (three different ones at different times as they seem to change them frequently)Even though I laid out in very clear terms with evidence, that I had been dumped on and that the IPO's own laws had been disregarded and broken, most of what I said was ignored and the rest twisted so as to appear that nothing wrong had ever happened. So you get nowhere. AND there is really no way you can appeal to anyone 100% INDEPENDENT!!
You can untimately complain to the Parliamentary Ombudsman, but what in REALITY is he?? Well they would have you believe that they ARE independent, but they are LIARS. For all these people are, are yet ANOTHER BUNCH OF LYING, CORRUPT AND TWISTED CIVIL SERVANTS only there to protect their fellow civil servants. For they do exactly the same as anyone in the IPO does and that is ignore your evidenec of wrongdoing, make loads of excuses on behalf of their brothers in arms and all this takes 6-9 months before you get your inevitable whitewash letter rejecting all your complaints and evidence. WELCOME TO JUSTICE 'BRITISH STYLE' RUN BY THE VERY PEOPLE YOU PAY TO KEEP IN EXISTENCE, IN THEIR CUSHY JOBS WITH EARLY RETIREMENT ON HUGE PENSIONS....THEY ARE ALL ASSHOLES AND SHOULD BE AS JEREMY CLARKSON SAID....SHOT IN FRONT OF THEIR FAMILIES. (For Treason and crimes against the British Public)

Intellectual Property & more on corrupt Police.

2011-12-12T12:55:00.000-08:00

Over the past few months case after case has been reported in the media about the Police (usually the Met) being willing to investigate incidents that can only be described as puerile and unworthy of any police attention. One is the investigation into Terry (the alleged footballer)supposedly calling an opposing black player racial names. Is this, even if it is true, worth the Met spending considerable amounts of PUBLIC money and their time, investigating???????? I think not.
I will not list all the other incidents which are many, but my point is that whenever a famous person has maybe committed some minor indiscretion and the media has latched onto it as they always do these days, the Police jump in with alacrity and make a big pitch by saying they will investigate it. Of course we all know why....because they just hate putting themselves at risk of media attention when they ignore such things. And we cannot have that, can we?
However on the other hand when we non famous members of the Public go to the Police and complain that acts of criminality have been heaped upon us, all we get is ignored and investigations are refused by the police making up all sorts of lying excuses. As in my case against the criminal conman Robert Busbridge, over his stealing all my Intellectual Property by forgery and over 200 acts of Perjury.
Then we have the DISGRACEFUL acts by a couple of Police Forces in recent years in that they persistently ignored the pleas of two families that were being harassed by the scum of Council Housing estates. This over many years and pleas for action from the Police (and Council idiots) which were made over 30 & 40 times and absolutely nothing was done. In one case the bloke who had an age of 10 ended up having a heart attack and dying. In the other case the Mother of a disabled girl ended up killing herself and her daughter. THIS IS WHAT OUR EXECRABLE POLICE ARE REALLY ALL ABOUT IN THE 21ST CENTURY!!! THEY MAKE ME SICKER THAN I ALWAYS FEEL ABOUT ALL OUR POLITICIANS AND OUR WONDERFULLY USELESS (AND CORRUPT, AS WITH THE IPO) CIVIL SERVANTS.
Of course if the British Public were not so apathetic, naive, up their own assholes all the time plus hopelessly lazy, we wouldn't have to suffer all these above assholes in the first place.

Intellectual Property & the Police (Again)

2011-12-01T12:20:00.000-08:00

You cannot open a newspaper or look at any form of media these days without seeing yet another story about crooked policemen. This time it is about the collapse of the prosecution of 6 of the bastards in South Wales who stiTched up 5 men for a murder they did not commit. Why did it collapse? They, the Police made sure that incriminating files mysteriously went "walkabout" AGAIN. How man times do the bastards do this, I ask? They are no more than "YOBS IN UNIFORM" or better still "CROOKS IN UNIFORM" and I had to rely on the bastards to not act corruptly in aiding their fellow civil servants to evade prosecution for incompetence and corruption, themselves. The man in the street stands no chance against any of these corrupt bastards in the civil service (and that includes the Police as they too work for the State (US))
I have had personal experience too of the Police losing my evidence that I stupidly let them have in the trial they forced me to have, brought about by the crook Busbridge in 1999/2000. They knew I needed that evidence in my continuing fight against that crook, so they made sure they lost it.
These are the shower one has to rely on for JUSTICE....ISN'T IT PATHETIC AND HOPELESS FOR ORDINARY PEOPLE ON THE STREET LIKE ME TO HAVE TO RELY ON CROOKED POLICEMEN AND FORCES??? It says a great deal about what this horrible country is now all about. Crooked politicians, crooked civil servants, crooked Judges (as shown in this blog) crooked Justice system, crooked Attorney General, crooked Ken Clarke, crooked Cameron and so on, ad infinitum!!! It's enough to make you lose the will to live!! But thankfully I am too strong for that and will continue to fight all the bastards.

Intellectual Property & the new Met Commissioner.

2011-11-20T09:31:00.000-08:00

WELL WE NOW HAVE A NEW SO CALLED SUPERCOP!! After getting rid of the last useless asshole Stephensen, is this one going to be any better, I ask??? What made me prick up my ears is when I saw him making bold promises that he would make it, that members of the Public who have been in the past, having their appeals to the Met to investigate crimes, turned down(Something they do with sickening regularity)and this is what I had to suffer as you will know if you have read this blog and the endless corruption and incompetence I have battled against.
So I thought I will test this bloke and see if he is as good a cop as the press is making him out to be. No doubt he will be another cardboard cut out cop just like all the other clones. All talk and no action and full crap and false promises. His words on this business of dead beat coppers, too lazy, or as in my case 'CORRUPT' to investigate anything. So I have just sent him a letter asking him to open my complaint again as to why the Met would not investigate Busbridge for serial perjury and forgery. Why they colluded with the IPO to hush it all up. Why they even went to the IPO in the first place as I had told them that they were the BIG PROBLEM because of their continual refusal to order any investigations over my complaints of perjury and forgery by Busbridge?
I asked him to put his money where his mouth is, in effect, as he had made this comment that he was going to allow members of the Public to insist that the Police investigate complaints of crimes being committed which prior to now the Met had refused to investigate.
So we have to see if he was indulging in rhetoric that meant nothing and was really designed to impress the press and the public as to what a good lad he is, full of big ideas that would benefit the pissed off Public (with our crappy useless Police Forces) I wouldn't hold your breath if I were you.
I will give him a few weeks and when I get no response whatsoever, which I think will be the result as it always is with all these assholes, I will then publish on this blog my letter so you can see for yourself what I exactly said. If he or some jackass in the Met does send me the usual brush off letter, that too will go on and I will still be denied JUSTICE by these bastards.

Intellectual Property & Oafish Ken Clarke

2011-10-11T15:30:00.000-07:00

Oh God how I despise that fat, bumbling, toffee-nosed twat, upper class Tory twit, who is supposed to be running our justice system. This very same fat, scruffy bastard, who ignored my requests to investigate the corrupt Judge Hobbs who aided and abetted Busbridge to pervert the course of justice at his appeal in 2005, against losing his ill gotten registration of MY TRADE MARK, by breaking every rule in the Judges Rule Book. Of course 'fat bastard' did what all upper class bastards in this country do, if they are supposed 'prefessionals', by sticking up for their own classes. This by covering each others arses. Ever tried suing a solicitor, or a doctor or a anyone who is posing as a 'professional'? You will know exactly what I mean.
Well here this last week we have seen the 'fat bastard' making a fool of himself by slagging May (Home Sec) off, over what she rightly said about 'IMMIGRANTS-' that we cannot get rid of. He showed what a 'bleeding heart Liberal' he truly is and that is why they call him 'the sixth Liberal Minister' He is a disgrace and should have been kicked into the long grass at the last election. Apart from helping the Police and the IPO and their corrupt Judge Hobbs,he talks such utter drvel and shite everytime he opens his stuttering gob. He cannot string together more than a couple of words without descending into a waffling, spital driven load of drivel. I'd love to give his fat arse a swift a good kicking for what he did to me. But then he's just the same as all those corrupt over paid assholes in our government, be they Tories or Labour they are all usless parasites. When will the stupid Brits wake up and have a revolution and get a proper 21st Century way of ruling Britain that will actually represent we people who pay for these parasites and that will work? I will be dead and long gone if it ever happens.

Intellectual Property & The Met Police's new commissioner.

2011-10-03T14:56:00.000-07:00

For those who regularly read this blog or those who are new to reading it, I should qualify my complaints about the Met Police. For unless you have all of this blog from the beginning, you will not get any connection as to why I am complaining about them and what they have to do with Intellectual Property.(I/P)
I had my Intellectual Property stolen by a conman called Busbridge. He did this by committing Forgery and Perjury at all 8 Intellectual Property Office (IPO) hearings from 1996 through to 2010.Despite my continual complaints that this was happening to the IPO, they chose for dubious reasons to ignore my complaints and to side with the conman.
So because the very government institution who I expected to help me fight this conman, they refused to carry out their duties and investigate the forgery and perjury despite my giving them all the documentary evidence they needed to have him charged, I was then forced to go to the Met Police and ask them to investigate.
I gave them a large and full dossier of all the forgery and perjury that was committed, where and when and the evidence. What did they do but go straight to the IPO and colluded with them and then without even interviewing me so they could properly understand the charges and the evidence. This amounted to no less than perverting the course of justice in order that the IPO be saved from any come backs due to their incompetence/deliberate refusals to investigate my complaints that criminal acts had been carried out at their hearings in order to pervert justice and make monetary gains.
You may wonder why the IPO would do this. Quite simple. I believe that in the early days they committed a number of acts either deliberately. Then they for some reason, decided to side with Busbridge and to swing events so that they could even take my legally registered trade mark off me and award it to the conman. All the evidence points to this. Had the Police simply investigated my complaints that Busbridge committed these acts of perjury and forgery at all these hearings, something they could easily have done without even any contact with the IPO, then had Busbridge gone on the face a trial and been found guilty, they would end up looking really crooked, stupid, incompetent, and to have deliberately engineered certain hearings in order to allow Busbridge to win them, which of course would be illegal. We couldn't have civil servants being shown to be corrupt.....COULD WE???
So they colluded with the Met and persuaded them not to take it any further and that is what happened and despite my strong complaints thereafter about this, I got nowhere.
As you will know the last useless Met Commissioner got the boot for being useless as had his predecessor and a new one has just been taken on. One Bernard Hogan-Howe (why is it I always have grave doubts about people who have double barrelled names??)
Well you could blow me over with a feather when last week in the Telegraph AND the Daily Mail it was reported that he had said the he was going to change things so that members of the Public who had suffered acts of crime against them, should be allowed to have a say as to whether those crimes got investigated. This being so as the percentage of crimes that were reported to the Met and like in my case, they refused to investigate was far too high,and he quite rightly said this was not right. Hurray, but is it all more bullshit made by an incoming White Knight who just wants to make a big impression up front, or will he actually carry out his promise?????
I intend to send him a full letter outlining the events re his police force's refusal to investigate and WHY I THINK THAT HIS POLICE FORCE IS GUILTY OF HELPING THE IPO PERVERT THE COURSE OF JUSTICE AND THIS MEANS THEY ARE GUILTY OF THAT CHARGE, AS WELL. I will after I have compiled it and sent it, put it on this blog along with all the other damning evidence. Let us see if he is as good as he makes out he is!!
So what I intend to do is write him a letter

Intellectual Property & The Met again.

2011-08-18T05:51:00.000-07:00

Actually it is the IPCC that is the culprit for this post.... once again. They have just announced that the four top officers of the Met who they investigated (as per my previous post on this)have all miraculously been exonerated of any wrong doing. Now is that a big surprise to you, for if it is it certainly isn't for me? For the IPCC as I have said again and again is no more than and excuse making body for the Police and so their pronouncement on these "Top Tossers" of the Met are to be entirely expected. Sir Paul and Yates did no wrong over the hacking AND THE NON INVESTIGATION that should have taken place back in 2005/6 and nor did any of the others and that cockney gypsy Andy Hayman who professed to be entirely innocent of anything on TV with his riveting piece of acting when asked about his wrong doings, even he was exonerated. So this allowed them all to crow how they were right all along to say they were all angels and guilty of nothing!! Next thing they will be suing us the taxpayers for their hurt feelings and having to step down. Utter bastards, the lot of them.
Exactly what has any cop got to do before this shower, the IPCC, ever find one guilty of anything? Even when they murder people they get away with it and they've just done that yet again when they tasered that body builder bloke FOUR times. Ok he may have been out of control but did he have a knife or gun? No he didn't and surely the useless cops could have brought him under control by other methods. No it's easier just to Taser him without any thought as to the consequences. Now ask yourself why didn't they use Tasers during the riots. The answer is simple, they were too scared to as they knew they would get beaten up. So when only one person is involved, it's easy for them to Taser him out of existence AND THEY KNOW THEY WILL GET AWAY WITH IT. If I were the relatives of this bloke I would sue them for this, that's of course if they could get legal aid, which would no doubt be denied them so that the police can get away with again.
IT IS AN ABSOLUTE DISGRACE THAT THE POLICE ARE UNTOUCHABLE AND NO ONE IN THIS COUNTRY HAS THE ABILITY IN LAW TO BRING THEM INTO LINE. THEY HAVE NO ONE IN CONTROL OVER THEM AND THAT IS WHY THEY ARE SO ARROGANT AS THEY KNOW NO ONE CAN TOUCH THEM..FOR ANYTHING SO WHAT CHANCE HAVE I TO BRING THEM TO JUSTICE OVER THE WAY THEY TREATED ME????

Intellectual Property & the ICO

2011-08-17T04:10:00.000-07:00

A few posts back I told you about how the Information Commissioners Office had dealt with my complaints about the IPO, the Met and the Dorset Police had refused to relase to me documents that had been created after I had asked the Police to investigate Busbridge for forgery and perjury.
Of course the ICO are EXACTLY the same as all other quangoes and departments set up by government to give the illusion that if you are steam rollered over by a government body, you can at least go to some commissioner or other body to get redress. ITS ALL A SHAM AND NON OF THESE BODIES DO ANTHING OTHER THAN PROTECT THE VERY BODIES YOU COMPLAIN ABOUT.......this is laughingly known as DEMOCRACY!!! If you believe in these bodies then your stupid and should be put away for your safety.
I know that the IPO sent DC Brimicombe of Dorset Police an email in which they supposedly gave him advice on whether perjury and forgery had been committed in their hearings. I know that because this oaf of a slimeball copper, told me he'd recieved this advice. Now how did he recieve it?.......obvioulsy through the email that the IPO said they were going to send him with this advice on it!!! Isn't that crystal clear? Yet it isn't apparently to the ICO. The IPO gave me copies of various emails etc but not this crucial email which they refuse to even comment on. The Dorset Police told the ICO that it had been destroyed so that proves its existence.
Yet in their latest letter to me today the ICO say "there is no strong evidence that it holds the disputed email now, if indeed it were ever held"
Now that statment just shows you how cynical these bastards are. First of all the IPO gave me copies of emails etc dating back years, yet miraculously now the ICO are hinting that this ONE EMAIL may not be around anymore! If it isn't then it has been cynically destroyed by the IPO so they cannot release it and this being the same as the DPS say they did to it. (If either ever did do this)
Then the cynical ICO hint that it just may be a figment of my imagination, and one has to ask, where did they get that idea from???? Yet why would the IPO tell Brimicombe they would send him this email with all the info in it that he'd asked for, and then not send it and why did this man then tell me he'd got all this info off the IPO and because of what he was told he would not investigate Busbridge. No doubt he was also told by the IPO I was a trouble maker, a nuisance, a nutter etc etc ad nauseam!! Hence why both the IPO & the DPS refused to let me see this email and now we have the ICO even saying they doubt it ever existed.... the bastards. So how can anyone have any faith that they are neutral and not as corrupt as all the other bastards in this story????
Then of course let us not forget that there was also another document, either a letter or an email that the IPO would have sent the Met in which they gave the same advice on me and all those hearings and whether perjury and forgery were committed.
The ICO ignored that complaint by me when I complained about the Met, just like they have done with the IPO & the DPS......what a corrupt shower.
These latest documents from the ICO to me and mine to them will show you all and will be put on this blog along with all the other documents.
This latest letter from the ICO was in reply to my complaint to them about their decision document of the 12th July, in which they exonerated the IPO and the DPS of all that I had complained about. I complained that many things I had said had been ignored and that I wanted them to answers my questions about that. Of course what happens when you ask specific questions to civil servants THEY ALWAYS IGNORE THEM AS IF YOU'D NEVER EVEN ASKED THEM. You will see this on those documents as I have notated on the copy of my letter where these questions have been ignored. You will also see that both the Freedom of Information Act and the Data Protection Acts are a completed farce and another con on the Public of Britain. You can ask for documents but if they will incriminate any civil servants you will not get them and you will be fed a whole bunch of excuses and be given so called parts of these acts, that allegedly give them the right to withhold what you seek. SO WHAT IS THE POINT OF THESE ACTS, I ASK????? Also you would have to be a good lawyer to know if what they tell you about these alleged parts of the Acts, are actually the truth or just made up. So they know that you as a non lawyer, will never know if you are being conned.

Intellectual Property & The stupid Met-Again.

2011-08-10T09:06:00.000-07:00

The Mets antics at these riots over the past 4 days have shown once again what thick ignorant, useless cops they are and that's not even mentioning that they are also corrupt!
We read today that they were even given orders "to stand back and just observe what was going on and not to arrest anyone" This could be clearly seen by all the TV scenes of these scum breaking into shops and torching them whilst a line of these thickos just stand yards away doing sod all.
No wonder they wouldn't investigate conman Robert Busbridge for what had he done....only lied hundreds of times, on oath and in court and making at least five forged documents which he put into evidence. All this so he could pervert the course of justice and win against me. I mean the Met probably thought this only a low level crime not worth expending any effort on. Or maybe better still they had been bought off somehow by Busbridges ex Met cop, mate. However the truth is that they were influenced, corruptly by the IPO not to act. That too is perverting the course of justice but the Met don't do any of that any more than "they do, arresting criminals and looters etc"

Intellectual Property & More on Police corruption.

2011-08-05T08:36:00.000-07:00

It never ends, these stories of what our wonderful boys in blue are getting upto every day of the week. Now we hear that two more of the useless corrupt bastards have been arrested in Cleveland and no less than the Head Numpty and his sidekick, for getting upto more jiggery-pokery. Plus down in deepest Dorset, my own useless corrupt set of bastards are showing us once again that they too are corrupt with one gorilla copper having it off with a woman who had reported her husband for beating her up. She then gets murdered by her Polish husband when he finds out. Nice one son!
Not to mention the bunch of Scouse tossers who play around in someones house they were searching, like a bunch of drunk 15 year olds. Doesn't it give you all the confidence in the world in our wonderful boys in blue??????? No wonder I couldn't get the bastards to investigate.
Thinking about why the Met investigated me on the perjured evidence of Busbridge, back in 1999 with such alacrity, yet didn't want to know when I gave them my dossier, I had to come to the conclusion that Busbridge had employed a Met policeman (or maybe a Surrey copper). This back in the late 80's and every IPO hearing from 2004 right thro' to 2010, that I attended, there he was holding hands with Busbridge. I have to come to the conclusion that the Met were corruptly influenced by this man to investigate me (he no doubt knew the right people to pull strings) and no doubt influenced again not only by this man but also by the IPO, not to investigate my complaints about Busbridge and me giving them the evidence to do that.

Intellectual Property & More on Met corruption

2011-08-01T04:03:00.000-07:00

What an absolute shower this mob really are. The recent hacking relevations only go to once more highlight how rotten to the core they are.
Of course I already knew this as they showed extreme corruption when they refused to investigate multiple acts of forgery and perjury committed by Busbridge. They as you will know, if you have gone through all the evidence attached to this blog, colluded with the IPO to work out a strategy on how they can both deny me justice and that folks is called "Perverting the course of Justice" Now as you will have already seen, my efforts to report all this to the IPCC, David Cameron, the Attorney General et al have all been ignored because I am not important enough for them to be bothered. Also all the newspapers likewise for some reason, don't want to know. Probably as it doesn't have any sexual titbits in it.
So although they don't want tp know in my case, this phone hacking case is right up their street and so they all pile in. I read over the weekend that an ex Army intelligence officer who has been involved in hacking or reporting it, had his computor hacked into and this is what he said on that; "Fundamentally what lays behind this whole cesspit, and just not since 2006 as it predates it by many years befort that- we're dealing with institutionalised corruption" Then he goes onto saying; " It's endemic within the Met police and has to be dealt with" Hear hear!!
What he is talking about is the fact that he reported that his computor had been hacked into to get details of what he had incovered in his detective work about newspapers, and this was reported to none other than the Met. Presumably some newspaper had done this but the Met as in my case invented excuses not to investigate as they were in hock to Murdoch et al. Hence his accusation of corruption.
Well I wish him luck and at least some newspaper has reported his words whereas in my case the bastards don't want to know. Just how does he think anyone will deal with his complaints anymore than anyone wanted to know about my complaints?

Then we also have the report in the papers over the weekend, that of the crimes reported to the Met, only a third ever get investigated. Well that does'nt surprise me at all. It further goes to show everyone that the Met and all the other forces in this rotten country of ours, are simply ripping off the Public taxpayers. For the Police are content to collect their high wages and all the other perks they get, yet they fail to do the job we pay them to do. IT'S ALL A BLOODY DISGRACE!! and if the Brits were'nt generally such an apathetic lot they wouldn't be able to get away with it. In actual fact I bet the figures are much higher than a third.

No wonder this country is a magnet for all the scum of the World who make their way, uninterrupted, into here, solely in order to rape and pillage us, knowing that as with all rich European countries there are huge areas and possibilties for them to commit every sort of crime that it is possible to do....and get away with it because we are useless and incompetent at catching and dealing with them. As the majority head for London, it is obvious that the Met play a huge part in not catching all these scum and we have to bear the brunt of all that. The high up officers of the Met with their huge wages, live in their manasiosn away from what actually is going on, as in the civil service, all the judiciary and our wishy washy, useless politicians.

Intellectual Property & more thoughts on Met

2011-07-21T13:43:00.000-07:00

I must say my delight knew no bounds when that shifty individual Yates, fell on his sword. Now let's us not forget that this bunch of incompetent, useless oafs that couldn't run a piss up for all those flat footed idiots under them, in the biggest brewery in the UK, were willing and able to allow the original supposed investigation into phone hacking, back in 2005, to fizzle out to nothing, then surely their allowing my request to investigate SERIAL FORGERY & PERJURY to be refused on entirely corrupt and non existent reasons, is very small beer.
You have to remember that I wrote TWICE to this top idiot Sir (doff yer cap boys) Paul Stephenson, complaining about the non investigation and the crap way my requests were being handled. What did he do........as all these creeps in government do.....he ignored my letters completely.
Do I get into the news ad nauseam? Do I get newspapers endlessly crapping on about what they did to me? Not at all, even though I have written to every newspaper in the land and the BBC, for who am I......an unknown peasant and not like several so called stars and supposedly important people? As I've said many times before in this wonderful country, ONLY THE RICH AND FAMOUS GET JUSTICE, THE REST GET KICKED UP THE ARSE FOR THEIR TROUBLES AND IF YOU ARE A CRIMINAL THEY WILL LOOK AFTER YOU AND GIVE YOU A MEDAL.

Intellectual Property & the Met AGAIN!

2011-07-18T05:51:00.000-07:00

If you have been reading all the publicity over the weekend about the Met you will know that the head of this useless and corrupt shower, Paul Stephenson has resigned. So he should and this is the ***t that ignored my letter to him about the corrupt goings on between his men at Camden and the IPO. The conniving and colluding in order to stop me from getting justice over Busbridges criminal activities.
You will remember also that both corrupt bodies refused to release to me the incriminating documents that would have proved that they were corrupt and indulging in ILLEGAL ACTIVITES by colluding together to deny me justice.
So I am heartedly glad he's gone the *******d. I hope he and that other twerp Yates, rot in hell, but then both will still get their gold plated HUGE pensions etc and will now be able to live the life of Riley, so they will not mind one bit, I am sure!
THE DICTIONARY STATES:- CORRUPT...lacking in integrity,open to or involving in bribery or other dishonest practices, putrid or rotten....CORRUPTION, the act of corrupting or state of being corrupt...dishonesty. So those of you who probably think I use this word with gay abandon, think again! I think that my constant use of this word is entirely justified, as I use it in the context of describing the goings on of ALL the government departments that I have been forced to have to go to and then have to put up with their rotten acts of corrupt practices.
Certainly the Met are the most corrupt police force in the UK and always have been . However other forces are also corrupt too, like my local force the Dorset Shower. Not many people in Dorset have much good to say about them, either and you should read my link to the website called Dorsetpolice.Then you will see some of the goings on they get up to. Same as the Met but on a smaller scale.

Intellectual Property & The corrupt Met Police.

2011-07-13T08:52:00.000-07:00

THE CORRUPT LIARS OF THE MET AND THE USELESS CIVIL SERVANTS OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONERS OFFICE, WHO LIKE THE IPCC SEEM ONLY TO BE IN EXISTENCE TO PROTECT THE POLICE AND THE IPO. SO THEY TOO ARE CORRUPT BECAUSE IT IS OBVIOUS THAT THEY ARE DOING THIS KNOWINGLY AND DELIBERATELY. THUS PROTECTING THE POLICE AND DENYING ME JUSTICE

How many of you have watched those wretched Met Coppers on TV blagging and lying their way through the MP's questioning them. What an utter shower they all are. I will not repeat what they were all about as you will all know. What I will point out that while they tried to shift the blame for their wretched corruption and incompetence, onto News Corp UK, saying they hampered the Mets investigation way back into the hacking. It's the pot calling the kettle black.
Now folks this is coming from the very same mob of bastards that HAMPERED MY TRYING TO GET JUSTICE AND MY ASKING THEM TO INVESTIGATE BUSBRIDGES FORGERY AND PERJURY!! Talk about HYPOCRITES and what did they do but hamper my efforts and in collusion with the IPO. Andy Hayman, how he ever managed to stay in the Met, came across as a right sleezebag, and the current top dog John Yates, wasn't any better making one excuse after another for not being at fault.
How can anyone have any faith in any Policeman in this country when we see those types runing the various forces around the country? Is it any wonder I couldn't get them to act on irrefutable evidence when they just went and colluded with anothet bunch of civil servants?

THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONERS OFFICE.
A few posts back I told you about how the ICO to whom I had complained about the Met and the Dorset Police, the IPO and the Parliamentary Ombudsman, all hiding from me documents that they all sent each other when I had tried to get the Met to investigate Busbridge. It really only involved TWO documents that I definitely knew existed. One the email the IPO sent Sgt Brimicombe of Dorset Police and two, the advice the IPO gave Sgt Downs at Camden Station to HELP him refuse to investigate. He admits in an email which is on this blog, that they gave him this advice.
In both cases I believe that the IPO will have disseminated to both the DPS & the Met, lies about whether forgery and perjury had been committed. I am also sure that they will have thrown in a load of derogatory remarks about me on a personal level.
This ICO mob gave me their decision re the Dorset Police a few weeks ago and how they were a bunch of whiter than white darlings who had done absolutely no wrong. I wrote about that a few posts back. Today I got their decisions about my complaints that all had refused me under the FOIAct and the DPAct and I talk now about the IPO & the Met.
The ICO have deliberately misread my complaints about both parties and in both cases they have twisted the requests I gave them in such a way as to be able to say that what I had asked for, was not able to be given to me. Yet what they say I had asked for is not what I had asked for, as I in the course of writing to both the Met & the IPO had honed my request down to those two specific documents. Originally I had asked for any documents they had that concerned me and in the case of the IPO what they had said to the Met and in the Mets case what they had said to the IPO or had received off the IPO and I specifically mentioned this one document. (the advice that the IPO gave Sgt Downs.)
In the case of the IPO I was specific about the email that they admitted they would send to the DPS. Yet what they, the ICO have done is spoken to the IPO and obviously have been fed lies by them which is what they do all the time. They try to say I did not apply under the right Act when the fcat is that I applied for the same under BOTH Acts and they say that information I had asked for could be openly seen under the Trade Marks journals which are open to the Public. This is a complete lie as what I asked for had nothing to do with any of the 8 hearings, so would never be found on any files open to the public. This is how these bastards work, by lying all the time and giving the ICO excuses so they can find for their mates in another government department. They are all shagging each other these civil servant bastards and covering up for each other.
In the case of the Met I even had to pay £10 in order to get any info off them under the DPAct. Yet when do the ICO even mention this so it's as if I am being told I did not apply under the right Act.
In both requests to the IPO & the Met I had simply asked to see both these documents which would have had in them matters to do with my request to get the Met to investigate all the forgery & perjury Busbridge had committed. All my letters about this are on this blog, so you can see for yourself what I asked for. Then the ICO deliberately complicate matters by constantly switching their remarks from one Act to the other and back again. The fact that there are TWO Acts that basically deal with matters that I think are the same. Some Wanker in Parliament who thought up these Acts (in order to fool the Public that they could actually make civil servants give up incriminating documents) has I think deliberately made matters in such a way that the powers can obfuscate all ways and tie you up in knots over what Act are you asking under? That is why I asked the same questions under BOTH Acts and they still lie through their back teeth and refuse you those documents. The whole thing is yet another sham and con on the Public.
In my case they have deliberately refused to give me those documents and the ICO have backed them up and as it is obvious the ICO have talked to the IPO it is also obvious that the IPO have given them a pack of lies. You can see how the ICO have been indoctrinated by the IPO as on the beginning of their decision document on the IPO, they state on page 2, under 'BACKGROUND', in 3 paragraphs, remarks about subject matter that I did not give the ICO. This is because they detail that I had a long running dispute involving trade marks etc etc, which they can only have got from some IPO mouthpeice. None of that is any business of the ICO and has absolutely no bearing on what I had asked to be divulged, as you will see from what I had asked to see. This proves beyond doubt that the ICO have been heavily involved in discussions about me on a personal level. ONCE MORE THE IPO HAVE INDOCTRINATED ANOTHER GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT THAT I HAVE GONE TO TO GET JUSTICE.....OTHERS INCLUDE THE DPS, THE MET, THE PARLIAMENTARY OMBUDSMAN AND SO ON.IT IS ALL A SHAM AND DISGRACEFUL and they are able to get away with it, time and again. They wouldn't if I were rich!
Their remark that I have been 'involved in a long running dispute' is said by them, to make me out as a litigious person. Yet who started all the legal actions?..ROBERT BUSBRIDGE, IN 2002 WHEN HE APPLIED TO REGISTER THE MARK THAT I OWNED AND AT THE SAME TIME APPLIED TO HAVE MY TRADE MARK MADE INVALID. ENOUGH SAID????
Now that is pretty well all the actions I could take to get Justice and they have run their course. I will next week get all the latest documents onto this blog and you can read for yourself what has gone on in my latest efforts to get Justice from a number of quarters. (The Attorney General and the ICO.) I will type out explanation remarks for each document that has been lately generated.
There will also be documents from my battle to get the Attorney General to get the Police to investigate Busbridges forgery and perjury. You will be able to see what that **** is all about too. Another useless sickening asshole filling his pockets with Public money and refusing to help those who he is supposed to serve and by a litany of excuses and outright lies. Yet another civil servant covering up for his fellow tossers. You will see how devious he and his minion McGinty has lied as laid out in my recent post. How I am told over and over how he cannot involve himself, but tucked away I am told that if I can prove by evidence I send him, then he could take steps, yet when I do exactly that all I get is a continuation of excuses. It is all there in black and white if you care to read it all.

Intellectual Property & my book Justice Denied.

2011-07-07T04:39:00.000-07:00

On my last post I talk about this book which as you can see you can download from this site. I sent this book to the following and I denote how many have responded:-

1/ NEWSPAPERS AND MEDIA OUTLETS I sent the book to 13 different entities and one negative response.

2/ TV PROGRAMMES AND THOSE WHO COVER SUCH TOPICS ABOUT CRIMINALS AND CONMEN ETC.
I sent 7 books and received not one response.

3/ INSTITUTES & QUANGOES (Victims Commissioner) I sent 2 books and had two negative responses.

4/ LAW COMPANIES WHO HAVE IP DEPARTMENTS.
I sent 41 books out and have received not one response and two of these people are high visibility Human Rights lawyers. But then these people are only interested in the human rights of foreigners and criminals....AREN'T THEY?

5/ GOVERNMENT BODIES, MP'S & MINISTERS.
I sent out 11 books INCLUDING ONE TO DAVID CAMERON and I have received only 3 negative responses. Entirely predictable I would say.

6/ UNIVERSITIES WHO HAVE IP DEPARTMENTS TEACHING IP LAW.
Here I sent out 13 books to the Heads of these departments yet it seems that no one is in the slightest bit interested in what is actually happening in the real World of IP, especially how the very body who is supposed to be looking after the interests of the Public re IP. So I so far have had not one response.

That makes 90 books with not one positive response and this is what any person who has been wronged in the UK is up against. Apart from wanting to get some help from somewhere, I also wanted to satisfy myself that this would be the outcome.
Of course the book is a long one and some may take some time to read it and it is possible that someone may react in the future. However my cynicism knows no bounds and I really do not expect anything positive for I think we live in a country now where pretty well everyone is so selfish they cannot be arsed to help their fellow man, even when it is crystal clear that corruption, and miscarriages of justice have taken place.
The conman in all this, one Robert Busbridge of Sutton, remains no doubt gloating at his huge success at conning not only me OUT OF MY BUSINESS AND IP, but every government body he has lied to on a massive scale. He will no doubt be delighted to hear that he so far is safe from any prosecution for his crimes because of all this apathy, even though I have toiled to get JUSTICE. When you hear of the Met Polices corruption over the hacking offences and how they refused to investigate 5 years ago, it is clear that one person like me STANDS ABSOLUTELY NO CHANCE......WELCOME TO OUR WONDERFUL COUNTRY THAT POLITICIANS ARE ALWAYS TOUTING AS BEING A DEMOCRATIC CLEAN AND LAWFUL COUNTRY. DON'T MAKE ME LAUGH!!

Intellectual Property & Nick Herbert Police Minister.

2011-07-06T11:36:00.000-07:00

You will see on this blog that I have written a detailed book on the whole of this sordid story of IP theft by Robert Busbridge, how I was treated by endless corrupt and useless government civil servants who sided with this conman and who then stripped me of my IP and gave it to the crook Busbridge. How I then have tried to get Justice to absolutely no effect by the following entities:-
The IPO, The Police, the IPCC, the Justice Minister Ken Clarke, The Attorney General,
a host of MP's including my own useless tosser, Chope,and so on ad nauseam. I wrote this book 'Justice Denied' because as I am not rich I could not afford to go to law to try and get Justice. If I had been rich none of this would have happened anyway as I would have stopped it 20 years ago by using the best law brains in IP. I also decided the book should be sent to as many influencial people and bodies as possible, and I will be commentating in the next post on who I sent the book to and how it has been receiveda nd how successful I have or have not been.
For now this post is about one of those MP's one Nick Herbert the Minister for Police. I wanted him to be able to see what the organisation he should be responsible for have done to me. So off went the book with a covering letter. Today I got the book back with a covering letter which once again tells you how our governments think about the people who put them where they are and pays their overblown wages. How they really hold us in contempt, for what they do amounts to this and insults us further. My letter to Herbert and the reply I got from one of his faceless organ monkies will shortly go onto this blog, along with all the backlog that has built up of other documents of recent times, all from similar useless costly bodies of unctuous civil servants.
" The Minister receives so much correspondence that he is unable to reply personally to all those who write to him" So it starts straight away with a put down for this was no ordinary letter....IT WAS A LONG BOOK ON A VERY SERIOUS MATTER OF CORRUPTION WHICH INCLUDED THE VERY BODY HE IS SUPPOSED TO BE IN CONTROL OF!!WHICH OBVIOUSLY HAD TAKEN THE WRITER A LONG TIME TO WRITE AND HAVE PRINTED, AT NO SMALL COST. OBVIOUSLY ALL THAT HAS GONE OVER THE EMPTY HEAD OF THIS TOSSER, OR HE IS BEING THE USUAL CYNICAL SERVANT THEY ALL SEEM TO BE?
The writer then goes into a typical civil service, wafflespeak load of tripe, in which they make all sorts of excuses rather than give you a result. I will not repeat it all here, for it is all irrelevant trash. I say this for HE IS CALLED THE MINISTER FOR POLICE. Now what should that tell us?????? The writer, another McGinty character, (Are all the Irish over here taking all our jobs, as almost everyone who sends me these kind of waffling excuse making replies, have Irish names.)seems to think he has no control over the Police at all, so what the hell is he for, I ask? This one goes by the handle of B.McGuire of no known gender!and the letter is headed The Home Office.
The very same shower who sent me a letter some months back telling me that if the Police did not investigate it was tough shit mate! They are a force unto themselves AND NO ONE CAN CONTROL THEM!! I was to take my own legal action !!!!!!!!!
This is why we are forever being assailed, almost on a daily basis, of lurid stories about how the Police have failed one poor family after another. If it isn't useless coppers fucking up an important murder investigation, they are indulging in yet more corruptness, as in today's story about how more than 8 bastards stitched up 4 innocent men for murder and are now belatedly being done themselves. To messing up the Dowler investigation and to sitting on the facts about the NOTW phone hacking story, because they were all getting back handers. The very same old firm of the Met who colluded with the IPO to stop me getting justice!!
Another story of corrupt coppers happened to me just recently, this when I fell off my motorbike after hitting something in the road. I got knocked out and a copper handles the scene. He goes into my wallet to see who I am and uses my mobile to ring my son, so he gets my number and after a few days and since then I am inundated with text messages from ambulance chasing arsehole lawyers. Another corrupt practice these bastards indulge in. I digress.
My point in this post is that this useless overpaid tosser Nick Herbert...what is he for and why is it that his Organ Grinder Monkies are deliberately keeping from him a story that HE SHOULD KNOW ABOUT? (they probably gor straight onto the phone to their IPO mates to see what it was all about and were told to bury it)......DON'T THEY MAKE YOU SICK. OH FOR A REVOLUTION.

Intellectual Property & the Information Commissioner.

2011-07-05T12:34:00.000-07:00

WHAT DID I SAY TO YOU ABOUT THE ICO?????
I have now got their decision letter about my complaint about the Dorset Police Service and them not handling my request for information under the FOIA & the DPA.
You will have to go back to my posts about all that and see the attached emails and letters from me to them and vice versa.
They behaved disgracefully in the way they handled my request and basically put two fingers up to me, which is the norm these days for the Police wherever. Even a complaint to their Chief and the IPCC as you will also know from previous posts got me absolutely nowhere.
This latest exercise in utter futility has gone exactly the same way. With yet another government department/quangoe refusing to act and siding with their bretheren fellow civil servants. The writer said that "It is likely that the DPS has complied with the requirements of the DPA" Now I don't know about you, but that is definitely not an unequivical statement made, because the writer has evidence they did. It is a wishy washy statement that one could say that equally it is unlikely they didn't. It is obvious that the ICO did not receive from the DPS any evidence that the DPS did 100% act within the requirements of the DPA, as I am sure if they had, they would have said so in a firmer statement. In other words we are giving the benefit of the doubt to the Police because that is how we work. We do not work on behalf of complainents (the Public that is) we work for our fellow civil servants.
All my evidence that I was treated like SHIT by this lying copper Shaun 'up your arse' Waldbridge, by him failing to deal with my request in the laid down proper manner and within DPA/FOIA rules, was cast aside and ignored as usual.
Then this tosser Kelly Steen who wrote this garbage, further shows us all just how corrupt even her department is, by saying that the DPS 'appeared likely that they have provided you with the information held about you at the time of your request. Now as this simply did not happen we have to take it that again the ICO has seen no evidence that they did, because again they can only manage another limp 'well it is LIKELY etc etc' IT SIMPLY IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH AND IT IS EXACTLY WHAT I EXPECTED OF THEM. In any case the DPS had no personal documents or information on me, only the one or two emails in question.
Then Miss Steen compounds her uselessness by going onto state 'They have confirmed that the emails had been deleted by the time of your request'. Now what this is referring to is the ONE email I knew the IPO had sent DS Brimicombe, in which the IPO would have well and truly slagged me off and warned the DPS what a wanker I was and a trouble maker and not to have anything to do with me, let alone show me the email that would damn them all.
NOW DO NOT FORGET THAT BOTH THE DPS AND THE IPO HAVE BOTH REFUSED TO DIVULGE THIS EMAIL, NO DOUBT A DAMNING EMAIL, WHICH WOULD HANG THEM ALL.....THE ABSOLUTE BASTARDS.
What you should know is that as soon as I had got hold of the email that told me that a further email would be forthcoming to the DPS from the IPO, I asked to see it. That would be within no more than a week or so of my getting from that Dickhead DS Brimicombe, a copy of the first email from the IPO to DS Brimicombe, because he left the email in my dossier. So are we to believe that the Police routinely get rid of all incoming emails within days of receiving them?...pull the other one. So it is yet more Police lying and the ICO going along with it.
This duplicitous Steen woman then goes into a protection mode of making excuses about how long organisations are allowed to keep emails etc before they trash them. We have to believe going on this case and what is claimed to have happened to that email, that it is only for a few days, and I simply do not belive that.
So what this means is that all three of my other requests to the ICO re the withheld documents, withheld by the Parliamentary Ombudsman, the Met Police and the IPO themselves, will end up the exact same way this has. Each organisation will trot out excuses,and the ICO will back them and defend them with a litany of lying excuses.
What makes me so mad with all the asshole government bodies that we the Public are supposed to be able to use to obtain justice against the civil service trash departments that fuck us about and lie to us and side with the very people we are complaining about, are all sitting there in their vast offices all paid for by the Public purse. They consume millions of pounds of our money doing absolutely nothing. Shuffling peices of paper around making it look like they are seriously taking up complaints. When all the time, all it is is window dressing, smoke and mirrors to fool us that indeed there are organistions that will help us when we get done over by lying, usleless, duplicious civil servants!! What a cesspit of inequity the Establishment of this country are. I have said it before and I will say it again. There is no democracy in this country, no freedoms and we really live in a country no better that any dictators country or any banana Replublic. Yet these ASSHOLE POLITICIAQNS RANT AND RAVE AT THE ASSADS AND GADAFFI'S OF THIS WORLD WHEN THEY DO TO THEIR PUBLIC THE SAME AS WE REALLY DO TO OURS. The only difference is that here the asshole Politicians do it in a much more sophisticated way. They do not bump people off or make them disappear, but they just block any attempts to use the systems we are told should give us JUSTICE. It all goes back to what I have said time and again....IN THIS ROTTEN COUNTRY YOU ONLY GET JUSTICE IF YOU CAN AFFORD IT!! EVEN THEN THEY CAN STILL BLOCK YOU IF THEY WANT, BY JUST MAKING SURE YOU WILL GET A JUDGE WHO IS IN THEIR PAY LIKE JUDGE HOBBS.....(Refer to my previous posts on him and how that bumbling oaf Clarke refused to investigate his corruption (despite the evidence) and the way he manipulated the appeal hearing he was supposed to hear, in collusion with the IPO, so as to block my getting justice and showing how corrupt and useless the IPO really are.)

Intellectual Property & More of Attorney General

2011-06-19T09:51:00.000-07:00

I have talked recently about my efforts to get the Attorney General to force the Police or the CPS to get Busbridge investigated for all the forgery & Perjury he committed in 8 Tribunal Hearings and one County Court case, not to mention the same crimes he committed with getting the Police to charge me in 1999.
I told you about my sending the A/Gen a dossier bundle of evidence and what one of his minions, a McGinty & his goat, eventually replied in a short page & a half reply.
You always know that the civil servants have not even read any of what you have said in long letters and or as in this case a huge bundle of well over a 100 pages of documents of evidence etc, when all they can manage in reply is a terse one and a half pages of tripe.
As I told you it boiled down to this bum saying that the Att/Gen could not interfere
in the fact that all the hearing officers, nor the trial Judge had asked that perjury be investigated or the forgery. Of course they didn't, the useless lazy bastards. In the case of the IPO hearing officers they, I believe by virtue of the evidence of their actions and subsequent actions and statements made by the IPO, wanted me to lose. That is apart from one, but there the IPO deliberately ignored his pronouncement that Busbridge was to lose and they then went onto manipulating events so that his verdict could be ignored. So this McGinty uses this as the excuse
that the Att/Gen cannot and will not do anything.
However this is a BIG LIE as the CPS in a document, which I copied to this McGinty Git say " absense of such a recommendation does not mean that there is no justification for an investigation" and this means that if the oaf of a hearing officer or a Judge doesn't see what is staring him in the face, and or takes no notice that he is being told by the person against whom perjury and forgery is being committed, that is is being committed, it means that the injured person should be able to ask the Att/Gen to look into the matter, for JUSTICE IS NOT BEING SERVED by the perjury and forgery being ignored. Remember what the Scottish prosecutor said about not allowing perjury to be ignored and the very good reasons for that. It seems in England the establishment do not adhere to the high standards they do in Scotland!!!!!!!!! But then I am but a mere peasant who does not matter, and Sheridan was a well known public figure....so there you have your answer.
In fact, he then goes on to say that if I got Busbridge to admit he had lied and here I must point out that in all my efforts to get justice EVERY civil servant I come across deliberately IGNORES the fact that FORGERY has been also committed and this is because forgery is easy to prove. At least it is in my cases, but no, they don't want TO KNOW about forgery so they ignore that and stick to the perjury where they can lie and make these excuses for not acting because as McGinty said "If the matter was brought to his attention by the trial Judge (here he in his ignorance, fails to see that Judges do not hold IPO hearings, but biased IPO employess do) in circumstances where the judge had found that a false statement had deliberately been made. It is not enough for one party to claim that his opponent has lied, that is for the court to determine in the proceedings"
Of course they say this because they simply want to brush all this under the carpet. It leaves people like me in the hopeless situation where because corrupt hearing officers or stupid lazy Judges either do not want to see what is happening in front of them, even when it is pointed out to them AND evidence has been put into the proceedings which show what is going on, it means you get your hands tied. It means that in every court case in upper courts or lower courts like tribunal hearings, all that happens is that people in them lie and lie and lie and they know they will get away with it BECAUSE THE SYSTEM DOES NOT WANT TO DEAL WITH LIES, AS IT IS ALL TOO MUCH FOR THE SYSTEM. IT IS EASIER TO IGNORE IT, WHICH IS WHAT IS HAPPENING TO ME. I have to suffer miscarriages of Justice and the trashing of my Human Rights under the H.R.Act that should be giving me the right to fair trials.
If I were a BLACKMAN or an ASIAN TRYING IT ON TO ENABLE ME TO STAY IN THIS COUNTRY, I WOULD BE TRAMPLED TO DEATH IN THE RUSH OF CORRUPT LAWYERS ON THE GRAVY TRAIN OF HUGE MONIES TO BE MADE, DEFENDING ALL THESE KINDS OF PEOPLE, WANTING TO TAKE ON MY CASE. Or if I were a criminal I would also be able to get a lawyer to help me win. In my case I cannot even get a Human Rights lawyer to answer an email of enquiry, let alone get them to take on the case. IT IS DISGUSTING.
IT IS ALSO DISGUSTING THAT THIS MCGINTY AND HIS GOAT SAYS I SHOULD GET BUSBRIDGE TO ADMIT HE LIED. IS THIS BLOODY MAN STUPID OR RUBBING IT IN TO SAY THAT, AS HE MUST KNOW THAT THIS IS THE LAST THING BUSBRIDGE WOULD DO? After being successful over 20 years of making over 200 seperate lies and forging 5 documents and he thinks he will suddenly cave in and admit to even only one lie.I WOULD LIKE TO PUKE ALL OVER THIS DEVIOUS BASTARD MCGINTY FOR WHAT HE HAS SAID TO ME, ALL IN ORDER TO SQUIRM OUT OF THE ATT/GEN DOING ANYTHING.
So there you have it, in the UK the mere ordinary bloke on the street once again gets trampled on by the Corrupt and useless Establishment who would rather see the peasants continue to suffer injustices. It saves them money and the hassle and they know we cannot resort to Law as we cannot afford the stupendous costs involved by taking on the bloodsucking lawyers, who let's face it are their friends. All of the same class. Went to the same Public schools and all that.
Lastly McGinty rubs it in by stating in his last paragraph that unless the Att/Gen has a trial Judge telling him that perjury was committed he will not act. My evidence isn't good enough. Of course the only trial Judge was the one in the 2000 trial at Dorchester and he was a tosser as he saw piles of perjury AND forgery being committed and DID BUGGERALL. All the IPO Hearing Officers as I have said won't do anything as some will be dead and or retired and in any case all were employees of the IPO, so we can be sure they were not independent and on IPO orders. Read through the papers of the 1994 hearing before Reynolds and tell me that that old buffer wasn't under orders to trash all my good evidence. It was so obvious that it was a sick joke.
Now that the Att Gen saga is over as I have gone as far as I can, it is only the Information Commissioner who is left where I could get valuable evidence of collusion between the IPO and the Met Police and the DPS, but you can safely bet he will act just like all the other corrupt government bodies and it will be a whitewash. Just you see.
So now I will soon put onto this blog all the rest of the documents that will bring the documentary evidence up to date.

Intellectual Property & Attorney General

2011-06-10T04:46:00.000-07:00

This guy and his office as you will know recently refused to order the Met Police to investigate the forgery and perjury committed by Busbridge at various court hearings and tribunal hearings over 20 years. Their vacuous and whitewashing excuses amount to nothing More than lies.
I was told by one of his henchmen a one Kevin McGinty (the name doesn't give you any confidence that the guy knows what he is talking about and reminds me of a song from the 70's about a McGinty and his goat) that the A/G will not consider any allegation of perjury. What a bastard liar, because in the paper the other day we have a story about an unfortunate man (a former magistrate) guilty of a rape. Then after two years in clink he is cleared on appeal due to a witness at his trial committing perjury! Now this man or his lawyers have complained to the IPCC and THEY HAVE ASKED THE HAMPSHIRE POLICE TO INVESTIGATE THIS!!!!!!!
So here we have two points to consider. One in my case the IPCC behaved in a totally different way by refusing to ask the Met Police to investigate Busbridges forgery and perjury. ( On the lying excuse that I hadn't provided the Met with any proof despite my 3inch thick dossier full of evidence). Yet here the fact is really that because they know it is in the newspapers and they are under Public scrutiny.
The second point is that on top of this, the man's MP is asking the A/General to look into this case. Of course I cannot do the same as my MP is in on the cover up and refuses to act on my behalf.
So the A/General and his organ grinder monkey, this McGinty bloke, are lying (don't they all and all the time?) when he says the A/G cannot investigate perjury that is committed in Court. When this is obviously a blatant lie as this mans MP would obviously not waste his time going to the A/G if he would not take notice and investigate that case.
Another example of how shonky this A/Gen is becomes clear when you take into account that recently he was asked to look at the Dr Kelly affair which people were up in arms about as no proper coronial investigation was carried out and many were perturbed about that as they suspected things were not as they had been put across as. He looked into all that and no trials had taken place about that. Yet with my case where trials had taken place, which were obviously miscarriages of justice and there was plenty of evidence of that because my human rights to fair trials had been trashed, he doesn't want to know as you have seen and that despite all the evidence I gave him.
Then very importantly and I asked him about this: why was it that Busbridge was able to go the Met and allege I had committed ONE act of perjury and two acts of forgery at my hearing where I had opposed Chryslers application to register my Trade Mark and the Met swung into action straight away with an investigation? No excuses that forgery and perjury had to only be investigated on the word and request of the hearing Judge??? Double standards once again and why did the Attn/Gen ignore that question. I will tell you why....because it was too difficult to get round so he indulges via his Organ Grinder and his monkey, by ignoring it and telling porkies.
This shows how two faced he is and how he is willing to protect others in government and a consumate conman, rather than do the right thing. So he tells lies as to why he cannot investigate or ask the police to investigate, which he does all the time.
What an asshole!!

Intellectual Property & corrupt IPO

2011-05-28T08:52:00.000-07:00

A few days ago I got the IPO pretending it was complying with the Freedom of Information Act and the Data Protection Act after I had reported them to the Information Commissioner for failing to give me copies of all the emails, records of telephone conversations or letters sent to the Met or the Dorset Police or the Parliamentary Ombudsman.
Initially they trickled out a few bits of paper from around 2004 which wasn't what I asked for. I complained to them and I got a few more from the time in questions but they were only copies of what I had already had,or about matters that were not what I asked for. In other words they were playing me for a fool once more, so I complained about them to the ICO.
They then with rapidity sent me a few more trickles of documents and I took them to task once more and this resulted in about a month ago, yet another exercise in duplicity. A few more documents that I already had and the documents I knew existed being ignored.
You may remember that the IPO had had emails sent between them and the Dorset Police. One I had got hold of clearly said that a guy called Hayward of the IPO was going to send an email answering questions the cop had asked him about me and my case. Obviously I needed to see this email as I can bet it contains explosive remarks which both the IPO and the Dorset pigs certainly do not want me to see. For if my intuition is right it will contain material that will incriminate both of the bastards.
So I sent this Julie woman another emails asking for this email. She sent me back an email this week saying that there are no more documents and that is that. In other words push off, that is your lot. Not answering you on the point about Haywards missing email. Of course all this is reported back to the ICO, but being yet another Government quango they will no doubt be all smoke and mirrors and will have no teeth as I have already commented on.
But what it clearly shows us is that all four bodies that have refused to give me what is my right to see only paints them black as black as they are clearly trying to hide material they know I can hang them with.....THE BASTARDS!!

Intellectual Property & more corrupt Met Police.

2011-05-28T04:12:00.000-07:00

Whilst what I am about to say has nothing directly to do with this story contained throughout this blog, it does indirectly. I am talking about the 'orrible copper that behaved as all thick yobbo coppers do throughout the UK but particularly in the Met. This is the yobcop that pushed over the newspaper seller in London last year.
I am estatic that he is going to have to face a trial over this. Will he ever get a sentence?.....I am not convinced he will.
History tells us that coppers, no matter who they kill or in what circumstances, they always get away with it. He behaved with the same mindset as the excrable coppers at Camden Police Station over my reporting Busbridge for 200 counts of perjury and five counts of forgery. You all know how they behaved as it's all in this blog with supporting documentary evidence. You will also know that I reported the bastards to the IPCC. Now here is the knub of my comments. In my case predictably the IPCC perfomed as expected and found these cops whiter than white as they always do. Now my complaint did not accuse the Bastards of murder or manslaughter, yet in the case of the newspaper seller, the IPCC again acted to form and initially when they investigated the death, they also found no faults with the actions of that copper.
Yet due to Public and Media pressure, they have had to climb down, but it remains clear that this organisation are "not fit for the purpose" yet again! It is clear that if they cannnot even act properly in blatant cases of manslaughter, how will they behave with what could be called "lesser cases" like mine?
In other words people like me stand no chance of all at getting them to act and facilitate me getting justice, in any which way.
Isn't the way members of the British Public get treated by "our masters" the Establishment, fill your hearts with joy and warmth? They are all BASTARDS and over paid ones at that, with our money, just so they can continually kick us in the teeth.

Intellectual Property & the Attorney General

2011-05-17T05:06:00.000-07:00

Got the blighters letter today and it's the usual cop out you get from all these duplicitous government departments. Even if today Britain cannot do anything right, what they excel in is evading doling out Justice to the British Public, ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY KNOW TO DO SO MAY OPEN THEM UP TO BEING SUED FOR COMPENSATION!! IF ONLY I HAD THE MONEY TO DO SO.
This letter will be shortly shown on this blog under the documents link.But what it amounts to is this;
1/ When anyone in this country is part of a Tribunal Hearing that hearing will be held by a CIVIL SERVANT and NOT AN SUPPOSED INDEPENDENT JUDGE!!
2/ Any hearing Officer because he is not Independent can ignore whatever acts of forgery or perjury you show has been committed. He can ignore the evidence you show, not even discuss it at the hearing nor bring it into his decision making. In other words it is as if it were never there or had it brought to his attention. He can do this because he knows that he will never have his actions questioned by anyone and the aggrieved person will never be afforded any avenue by which he can get justice. Even when faced by a lawyer laying out how perjury has been committed he can simply ignore him and what he says and shows. He can ignore witness affidavits and statements, again with impunity.
3/ You will be faced with the fact that the hearing officer could actually be under orders to make sure that no matter what evidence he has put to him he should find for only one of the bodies involved. In my case it is my contention that the IPO did not want me to win because they knew if I did it would give me the evidence that the IPO had acted incompetently and I was of a mind to sue them. What better motive?
3/ You will be put in a situation whereby you simply have no avenue to correct these acts which constitute a miscarriage of justice. For the very court Judge (the hearing officer)can as I say, refuse to recommend the perjurer be investigated, the Police in collusion with the IPO, can decide also not to investigate and that lays both parties open the accusation that they have deliberately acted to deny justice to the aggrieved party. The IPO and the hearing officer who is an employee of the IPO know that the aggrieved will have no avenue to correct what has happened.

IS THIS WHAT DAVID CAMERON MEANT WHEN HE SAID THAT HE WAS GOING TO MAKE BRITAIN A FAIRER COUNTRY????? DENY THE PEASANTS ANY WAY THEY CAN GET JUSTICE AGAINST HIS OWN CIVIL SERVANTS????

Intellectual Property & Documents on blog

2011-05-16T09:27:00.000-07:00

You may have seen that I have now got all the latest copies of what documents passed between me and several government departments; The IPCC, The Parliamentary Ombudsman, The Attorney General etc. You can see how each and every one has done their utmost to continue to deny me justice.
This last week I finished sending out 100 copies of my book Justice denied to selected MP's including the Prime Minister, the newspapers and TV programmes, Professors of Law at Universities, selected IP lawyers of note around the country. We will see where that gets me.
The Attorney General has my dossier with all the evidence I gave the Police and who lied by saying I gave them no evidence. I wonder what he will do and is he going to be a corrupt as the all the other government departments, ombudsmen, and assorted quangoes???
Also the Information Commissioner has been sitting on my complaints that I have been denied documents that will show the Met & Dorset Police forces have been corrupt by colluding with the IPO over me. Over my trying to prove that the IPO have brainwashed the Police into not investigating the perjury and forgery I requested.Like the Att Gen one wonders what they will do as all these government bods are a total waste of time, so far. Maybe one day one will pop up who isn't corrupt and only thinking that he should not rock the boat in case he loses his pension.

Intellectual Property & Corrupt Police

2011-05-16T09:18:00.000-07:00

Why tell you about corrupt police? Well if you have read this blog from the beginning or the book you will know that I have been done by corrupt coppers at the Met & Dorset Police when they both refused to investigate you know who for Forgery & Perjury. Lying as good as the Worlds Biggest Liar and corruptly colluding with the IPO to deny me justice.
Well if you do not keep up with the news, you will have missed last week the story of no less than 8 cops being done for criminal offences and no less than a Chief Constable being done for nepotism. That is he tried to get a relative into the Police
by circumnavigating the official channels. Typical for bent cops that kind of behaviour. So my bent cops were keeping up the noble tradition we have in this glorious country that corrupt pollies are always telling us is so clean and corrupt free, compared to all the corrupt dictators around the world etc. Dream on I say, they are just as corrupt, but more clever at hiding it.

Intellectual Property & the IPCC

2011-05-04T05:13:00.000-07:00

I have long said that the IPCC are yet another bunch of useless overpaid civil servants who are only there the apologise and defend the Police. I've said it on this blog and in my book and NOW WE HAVE THE IRREFUTABLE PROOF. For in today's Times Newspaper they state in their Editorial Comments column that the killing of Ian Tomlinson by the Met Police was UNLAWFUL, as did the jury....God Bless them. If it were not for juries we the British Public would forever be treated corruptly by the Establishment and especially the Police.
Look at how the very same Met Police treated me when I gave them irrefutable proof that a conman namely Robert Busbridge committed gross and persistent acts of forgery and perjury, they refused to even investigate my allegations despite the masses of evidence I gave them. They even said I had not even given them any evidence at all. So their usual gross acts of persistent lying. They never even interviewed me despite commenting that they did not "UNDERSTAND" that evidence I gave them. What a shower!!
Then when you rightly complain to the IPCC you are then given the run round and then in the end they engage in a flurry of excuse making to paint what the Met did as whiter than white and nothing to worry about.
Now what has this got to do with the killing of Tomlinson? Very easy to explain that, as the IPCC as they do, had to "Investigate" that gross act by a member of the MET!! All of us in the country knew that this was yet another example of how out of control the Met are. They are nothing more than a bunch of thugs and crooks in uniform as are all the Police in this country. Not only thugs, but crooks in uniform, as well. The IPCC did exactly with that investigation as they did with mine. That is they backed the murderous actions of the Met up to the hilt and did not advise that the policeman should be charged and tried for it. So we all could see he needed to be brought to trial, yet the IPCC engage in yet another gross act of white washing and grovelling to the Police. WHAT A SHOWER!!
Minutes before writing this post I am listening to the 1 o'clock news and it is reported that at least 5 policemen in the Liverpool Police's elite armed squad (I would not trust any Scouse coppers with a gun, are the authories mad? And I say that as a scouse!!)are to be investigated for selling goods they had nicked whilst on raids on peoples houses. You couldn't make these bastards up, could you? This completely backs up what I have stated about what the Police really are, a complete and utters shower of liars and crooks and thugs in uniform!! What do you think? All you dumb people who read this blog?? I say dumb as you must all be that as in 3 years of this blog being written no one has ever made a comment on anything. And thousands read this blog. Is this down to the good old "British Apathy about all contentious matters??" You all only squeal when it happens to you, when it happens to others....so what?

Intellectual Property Office & the corrupt Met Police.

2011-04-27T12:15:00.000-07:00

As you will know both the Met & the Dorset Police colluded with the IPO and I have been trying to get all three corrupt entities to cough up the documents that passed between them. The Met admitted that they had talked to the IPO about me and my asking them to investigate Busbridge for perjury and Forgery and I merely asked to see whatever letters or emails pased between them. Obviously I was refused by both of the corrupt bastards.
Now due to our wonderful politicians, they devised TWO Acts that this can be done insted of one. These are called the Freedom of information Act and the other is the Data Protection Act. Because one cannot get sight of any document hopw are you supposed to be able to determine which act any document may come under? The FOIA concerns I think general documents that are not solely about you and the DPA is about documents solely about you.
I had asked the Met in the first instance under the FOIA and they refused to cough up. So then I had to ask under the DPA and today they again refused. SO WHAT THIS MEANS FOLKS IS THAT THE MET ARE SAYING THEY HAVE NO DOCUMENTS WHATSOEVER WHATEVER THE ACT, OR THEY ARE SAYING THAT THEY HAVE BUT WILL NOT RELEASE THEM. Either way it shows they ARE COMPLETELY CORRUPT, AS WE ALL KNOW THAT THE REASON THEY REFUSE AND THAT IS BECAUSE THEY KNOW WHATEVER IS ON THEM WILL INCRIMINATE THE BASTARDS!!
So it now remains to be seen just how effective the ICO is and I will bet you they are as bad. I will go out and get pissed if ANY GOVERNMENT BODY ACTS COMPLETELY HONESTLY OVER THIS WHOLE AFFAIR......AND IT MUST BE IN THE SIXTIES THE LAST TIME I WAS PISSED!!

Intellectual Property Office. Letter to Attorney General.

2011-04-25T05:14:00.000-07:00

Following my complete and unsuccessful attempt to get the corrupt Met Police to charge Busbridge with Perjury & Forgery, after they colluded with the IPO, not to investigate. Probably on the grounds that to do so would bring it out into the open that the IPO have deliberately and cynically made sure Busbridge won most times over the past 10 years. So I have now been forced to go directly to the Attorney General as you can do (I have been told) with the same dossier that I gave to the Met, in order that he should set in motion an investigation. I want to see if he, one of the countries top justice people, is as corrupt as all the rest of them.
It is interesting to note that Sgt Walters of Camden Police Station who was the corruot officer who did all this colluding with the IPO, said in his report whan he refused to investigate, that I had not given him any evidence to back up my allegations of Perjury & Forgery. He also told the investigating officer of the IPCC the same pack of lies because he also used this as an excuse to exonerate Walters and rubbish me. Of course my dossier did include all the documentary evidence needed to charge Busbridge with these criminal acts.
Now hark back in this story to 1999 when Busbridge went to the Met alleging that I had forged our agency agreement document. He provided absolutely no evidence at all save him saying 'He thought it had been forged' The Met then investigated with the speed of a cavalry charge and I was charged in quick order; Isn't this so hypocritical and typical of the Met???
ARE'NT THEY ALL JUST A PACK OF LYING BASTARDS HELL BENT ON STOPPING PEOPLE FROM GETTING JUSTICE, BECAUSE TO DO SO WOULD SHOW UP THESE INCOMPETENT CORRUPT BASTARDS FOR WHAT THEY ARE. sO LET US SEE WHAT THIS ATTORNEY GENERAL DOES OR DOES NOT DO ABOUT THIS. KEEP LOOKING AT THIS BLOG AND YOU WILL EVENTUALLY FIND THIS OUT. AS FOR ME I AM NOT HOLDING MY BREATH.
THE DOCUMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN PASSING BETWEEN ME AND VARIOUS GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS OF LATE, THAT I HAVE SAID RECENTLY WILL BE POSTED FOR YOU TO SEE ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING, WILL BE POSTED SOMETIME THIS WEEK, INCLUDING THIS LETTER TO DOMINIC GRIEVE MP, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.

Intellectual Property the book is printed

2011-04-21T15:37:00.000-07:00

The book on my horrific experiences at the hands of the IPO is now printed and comes in at 427 pages. It describes in detail from day one back in Jan 1992, how the IPO have stitched me up in many and various ways. How they have believed a man who is nothing more than a crook, a criminal and a conman. At the same time the have believed nothing that I have shown in my defence by way of documentary evidence and affidavits by independent witnesses. They also chose to ignore the glaring perjury that was committed in 8 hearings from 1996 through to 2010. They even ignored the inconsistencies in his written evidence which clearly showed he was lying.
When I asked them to take action on the forgery and perjury they also ignored my pleas and when I went to the Dorset and Met Police they lied and colluded with them to stop any investigation.
Well I am now getting together a list of people in Parliament, the media, law schools at Universities, and a host of others, to send this book to them in the hopes that at least there is someone who will see the monstrous acts that have gone on and are willing to help in some way. My hopes that someone in the law will help on a now win no fee basis. After all there are hordes of lawyers willing to help people who have broken a leg etc and to help hordes of immigrants wheedle their way into the UK, so why not help someone with an open and shut case???
Of course you can see this book on the link on this blog. It had been on before in rough form but it has now been edited and brought right up to date and professionally laid out and printed. All the documents that back up my case and the so called evidence which contains all the perjury and forgery are on this blog too.
The last bunch will go on in the next few days.
As a matter of interest Busbridge is still up to his lying and this time in the press about how he was able to steal my car designs and sell what is my car for the past 23 years. (his claim of 23 years is yet another of his lies as he copied my car in 1992/3 and that makes 20 years at most.
The book can be bought if one wants one for reference by leaving your details on the comments of this blog

Intellectual Property Office & Complaints about them.Latest.

2011-03-18T06:59:00.000-07:00

A lot has happened since my last post and none of it positive for my quest to get JUSTICE against this conman. All concern corrupt actions or should I say non actions by various government bodies and people. These are The Dorset Police, The Met Police, The Independent Police Complaints Commissioner, the Attorney General, My MP Chris Chope, Kenneth Clarke the Minister for Justice.
I will deal with each of these below. Firstly with:-
The Dorset Police.....You may remember I had been waiting for their response since September 2010 to my complaint to their Complaints procedures that they had refused to investigate my request to investigate the forgery and perjury of Busbridge. I had also put in requests under the Freedom of Information Act and the Data Protection Act. This was to give me all information that had passed between them and the IPO and the Met concerning Busbridges perjury etc. They are supposed to act in definite
ways under these Acts and of course they ignored all the rules and so I never got a scrap of info despite my knowing there is info there as I have an email to them from the IPO which clearly states there is, which I am sure I have mentioned in recent past posts.
I eventually got in late Feb their response which was EXACTLY as I expected. You can read our wonderful Police like a book. (One on corruption that is)The copper Brimicombe lowered himself to the floor by engaging in a litany of lying about our meeting when he tried to intimidate me and put forward spurious lies as to how there had never been perjury committed (He studiously ignored the forgery)and saying that perjury could only be reported by either the Judges of the hearings or the Attorney General. When I pointed out that his Force saw no difficulty in charging me with perjury and forgery on the lies of a conman (Busbridge) without recourse to saying to Busbridge that it was the hearing officer or the Attorney General that had to do him. He had no answer to that one but it made no difference to them actually investigating my complaint.
All that is posted in previous posts and now in this knock back letter, Brimicoimbe shows what an asshole he really is by going into an orgy of lying himself by saying I had shouted and sworn at this hearing and had behaved in an overbearing manner. Of course I am not that stupid to do so at any meeting where I am trying to get the Police to act on my behalf. Of course his cohort copper who was present as the POLICE WITNESS backed him up by also lying. This is the what we the Public have to put up these days with our corrupt, lying scumbags that dare to call themselves Police! The reply by them will in due course be attached in full to this blog as will a number of documents that so far I have not had time to put them on. This will be done when I have the time as there as quite a number to sort out and get them on, so please be......PATIENT.
They ignored my complaints about not giving me the info under the various Acts but that has now gone to the Information Commissioner who deals with complaints under those Acts.
THE MET POLICE.Here their story which I have already recounted but I did complain about them to the IPCC about their refusal to also investigate perjury and forgery by Busbridge. They also refused to show me all their documents etc that went between them and the IPO. You see both Police Forces and the IPO do not want me to see any of these documents because they know they contain valuable information and facts that will show them up for what they are:- Conniving, corrupt and lying bastards who have all conspired to deny me Justice for reasons that they refuse to divulge and the emails will have given me the answer as to why they refuse the deal with BUSBRIDGE AND HIS CRIMES!
THE IPCC. YET ANOTHER USELESS GOVERNMENT CON ON THE BRITISH PUBLIC. My complaints to them about the MET which I did first was as I fully expected.....a typical whitewash so as to protect the Police. How many times have you read that the Police or a particular Policeman has actually been severely done for breaking the law???? They even get away with blatent murder,so they got away with this...easy peasy! No sweat, and they know I am impotent and so they can get away with anything. So my complaint to the IPCC got nowhere as usual, so I never bothered to report the Dorset Police as that too would have been a total waste of time.
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL MR DOMINIC GRIEVE MP. I sent him a letter late last year asking him if what the Police had said as to how perjury can get dealt with, was correct. After many months of waiting got a reply, not from Grieve but one of his pen pushers. I was told I was asking for legal advice. It completely goes over his head that what I am really asking for, is for him to say that what the police had claimed was correct or incorrect and for him to explain what his duties were over the reporting of perjury. Not asking for legal advice at all.
I replied in my usual forthright way to Grieve again and saying I was not accepting that vacuous reply and wanted an answer from him and not one of his minions. Months later.... still no reply.
THE IPO... I asked them in the same way, to release copies of all emails, letters or records of telephone conversations between them and the Met and Dorset Police Forces. They refused to relase all of them but did feed me with a few snippets, a couple of them dating right back to 2004, so did not deal with the important up to date documents. They did show me that even in 2004 they had very negative attitudes to me personally and this was way before I had really started on them. So God knows what they think of me know?
THE INFPORMATION COMMISSIONERS OFFICE.I have reported both the Met and the Dorset Police and the IPO for refusing to divulge information I knew they held on me and the goings on between them and the two Police forces. I at this moment am waiting to see what transpires, but as my faith in ALL GOVERNMENT BODIES IS SHATTERED I DO NOT EXPECT THEM TO BE INDEPENDENT AND TO FORCE THESE BODIES TO COUGH UP THE DOCUMENTS. All these so called independent bodies that are supposed to help the Public get answers and Justice against recalcitrant, and corrupt Government bodies, are a sham. They have no teeth at all, not one of them, including the IPCC, so the Police are really a law unto themselves. You simply cannot get anyone to bring them in to line.
KENNETH CLARKE MP. SO CALLED JUSTICE MINISTER. I cannot stand this oaf and never have done and that goes back to the last Conservative Government. He is the epitomy of the fat, oafish, upper class Conservative twits found in numbers in this government. His reply to my first letter was not done by him but the very department that I had complained about. So it was a tainted whitewash. I wrote back in last September to lambast it and I tore it to shreds and I emphasised that I wanted HIM to deal with it and answer it. To date many months down the line and still no answer and I know I will not get one as he hasn't the guts to deal with it as he knows I am right.( This was my reporting that a Judge Hobbs QC was corrupt and the facts surrounding an appeal he heard. This asked for by Busbridge as reported by me in past posts).
THE PARLIAMENTARY OMBUDSMAN. I had reported to them the fact that the IPO had denied me Justice by having several hearings where they denied me this justice and a "Fair Trial" as required by the Human Rights Act. They had also denied me Justice by conniving with the Dorset & Met Police to again allow them to stop investigating the Forgery and Perjury as reported to them by me. Also to denying me the documents I had asked them to provide me. They sent me a long winded whitewash which again denied me the justice I seek.

NOW AS SAID ALL THE LETTERS FROM ME TO THE ABOVE BODIES AND PEOPLE AND THEIR REPLIES TO ME, WILL BE SHOWN IN FULL AS SOON AS I CAN GET ROUND TO IT AND TO GET MY SON TO DO THE ACTUAL LINKING OF THEM ONTO THIS BLOG, WHICH BELIEVE ME IS NOT TECHNICALLY EASY TO DO.

At the moment I an awaiting what the ICO have to say about the FOIA and the DPA Acts being ignored, but I am not holding my breath. I also await my last complaint to the Parliamentary Ombudsman about their refusal to divulge all the letters etc as supplied to them by the IPO, when I made my complaint to them about the IPO.

Finally MY LOCAL MP, ONE CHRIS CHOPE. MP's are no better than any of their government departments....all utterly useless and self serving etc etc. I have been asking him for a couple of years now to help me over the myriad of departments I have vainly tried to get justce through. He being an ex lawyer (Aren't they all ex lawyers, these assholes in govenment and probably all were useless laywers and that's why they went into the soft option of being an MP)should have been able to do this easily. Of course all he wants is an easy life with no effort plus all his perks and expenses etc. He's not interested in his constituents.
He has steadfastly refused to help me and he does this by ignoring all my letters asking for help. I will be reporting him to the Chief Whip who is supposed to deal with such complaints, but again I am not holding my breath.
LASTLY, I have now finished my book on the whole of this story which is called "JUSTICE DENIED" A preliminary copy of my early manuscript of this has been on this blog, but that has been edited several times and added to. SO very soon the finished article will be replacing it and the book will shortly be published. It will go out to every Law Professor in the country AND every Minister who I think is remotely responsible for every department I have complained about. I will include the Prime Minister as well.
It will also go to many people in the media as an example of how people in this country are shat upon by government and that this story is but one of thousands of examples, many of which never see the light of day. How criminals in this country are pandered to whilst law abiding citizens like me are treated with contempt and like criminals ourselves.
It will also go to many people that I think would be interested and who are in positions of power and influence, so could help to strike a blow for all of us who get regularly shat on by the Establishment, whom we pay to keep in existence.

Intellectual Property Office & other actions.

2011-01-12T08:52:00.000-08:00

Because our corrupt Police Forces of Dorset & The Met refuse to investigate the criminal actions of Liarman Busbridge, I have been forced to report the Met to the Independent Police Complaints Commission. They don't have a good reputation as being independent so we will see how they fare. I cannot yet report the Dorset shower as they have since September 1st, deliberately gone slow on officially turning down my official complaint about their non actions. Well this is typical of the Police these days who in my book are nothing more than a rabble in uniform. By acting as they are doing they make themselves no better than the crims they are supposed to be protecting us from. This by a rabble of crims themselves, only they are in uniform. I mean it takes a crim to recognise one as the saying goes.....how true.
When I finally get a knock back from the Dorset Rabble Yeomanry, I will then send in my report on them to the IPCC, no doubt for yet another fruitless exercise in futility.

Dorset Police are also behaving in a disgusting way by refusing to divulge the emails and letters that went between them and the equally corrupt IPO. What have they to hide I ask????????? They haven't even kept to the rules by issuing me with an official refusal AND IN FACT THEY ARE JUST IGNORING MY REQUEST AND EVEN THEIR DEPUTY CHEIF CONSTABLE REFUSES TO ANSWER MY LETTER ASKING WHY HIS FORCE IS BEHAVING THIS WAY. ANOTHER ASSHOLE TO ADD THE THE LONG LIST OF ABSOLUTE ASSHOLES THAT I HAVE. Then of course the Met have done the very same, but at least they issued the refusal and that lets you go on to lay a complaint to yet another official so called watchdog, who will no doubt turn out to be a toothless as all the other dozens of these parasites that exist in this wonderful SHIT country of ours.
I tell you I may as well be living in RUSSIA for all the corruption and useless incompetents we have all around our government bodies/institutions and our corrupt politicians.

Don't forget Ken Clarke...He the 'Criminals Friend' still hasn't replied to my complaint about that the Corrupt Judge Hobbs who hasn't been dealt with. This is how the ASSHOLES in Politics behave, when you get them into a corner and they know they are in the wrong and they just don't want to act for to do so will be an admission of their uselessness......THEY IGNORE YOU!!!!!!

Then there is yet another corrupt politician, none other than the ATTORNEY GENERAL, DOMINIC GRIEVE. MP, who refuses to say whether the IPO were right to say that perjury cannot be investigated by anyone unless the A/Gen gives his OK. Again he is in a corner so what does he do? He says I am asking for legal advice which he doesn't do, when all I am doing is asking him to verify if another government is lying or is telling the truth and what is his job in relation to the reporting of perjury????? ASSHOLE.

I have yet to see how the INFORMATION COMMISSIONER does re my complaints at not getting the documents I have requested from the IPO, the PARLIAMENTARY OMBUDSMAN (who will no doubt invent excuses not to release what documents they got from the IPO)and lastly also from the DORSET POLICE and the MET POLICE.

QUITE FRANKLY I DON'T EXPECT ANY OF THESE GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS TO BEHAVE PROPERLY AND ABOVE SUSPICION, BUT I AM DOING ALL THIS PUSHING SO I CAN SHOW YOU ALL JUST HOW CORRUPT OUR SYSTEM IS WHEN THE ESTABLISHMNET DECIDE THEY WILL NEVER ALLOW YOU JUSTICE. THEY ALL BAND TOGETHER AND YOU CAN KISS JUSTICE ON IT'S ASS.

Intellectual Property Office & Parliamentary Ombudsman.

2010-12-29T09:30:00.000-08:00

As I told you in my last post, today I got the decision from the Parliamentary Ombudsman. As expected a TOTAL WHITEWASH. Everytime you contact them they go running to the IPO, and they feed them full of lies because it is obvious they will NEVER admit to any wrongdoing. It is a total farce, but one I wanted to go through so I could show you that YOU WILL NEVER GET JUSTICE WHEN YOU HAVE TO RELY ON ANY GOVERNMENT BODY. They all band together and cover each others arses.
One interesting statement he made was that even though I gave the IPO evidence of perjury and Forgery, they did not believe me, or the evidence of Kunzli or Martin as we all liars. Yet Robert Busbridge is an angel, whiter than white and they can believe everything he says. Rather than give the evidence to the right authorities to decide whether these crimes were committed, I am damned by the IPO who act as Judge and Jury and without so much of actually examining my evidence closely
Look at copies of all my letters to them on this last futile act and see their reply. See the evidence in emails and documents I gave them that proved that the IPO had promised to deal with this perjury in Jan 2010, which they reneged on. Some of these are already on this site and the latest will be added to the documents link in due course.

Intellectual Property Office. A Merry Xmas.

2010-12-25T02:58:00.000-08:00

YES, I WISH A MERRY CHRISTMAS TO ALL GOOD MEN, SO THIS WILL NOT INCLUDE CIVIL SERVANTS AND THAT ASSHOLE BUSBRIDGE. ESPECIALLY INCLUDED THIS YEAR ARE OUR DARLING POLICE FORCES.......WHY:-

As you will have seen if you have been reading this blog, the IPO have consistently refused to deal with the obvious perjury and forgery committed by Mr Liarman. So in August 2009 I approached my local Police Force....Dorset Police to ask them to take over and investigate these criminal actions by Liarman. If you have read my book which is accessible by the link on this site, you will have seen how I have not got on with them. This makes them as corrupt as the IPO. Firstly Dorset Police said the perjury would have been committed in London, so they asked London Police to take over my complaint. The Met said perjury had not been committed. This despite me giving the police a dossier in which I gave over 200 pages of evidence documents and lists of all the lies told, plus what documents had been forged. Affidavits by Kunzli my old Swiss agent and Martin Busbridge, Lairmans brother. On the links you can see all the documents for this whole story and you will find some of the documents concerning the police. In any case I will soon put on copies of all the recent documents concerning my efforts to get the Police assholes to do the job they are paid for.
These will include my reports to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) about the refusal of both forces to uphold the law. I have at the same time been trying to get the two police forces and the IPO to give up to me copies of all documents about me both on a personal level and to do with the collusion between the two police forces and the IPO. I know that emails and letters and phone calls have passed between these people as I have two of them that a dopey copper, DC Brimicombe left in my dossier when I made him give it back to me after his refusal to investigate.
The lies and excuses these asshole police have made to wriggle out of their responsibilities, beggars belief. From saying that perjury couldn't have been committed as none of the lies in all Liarmans statements were not made on oath, to only the judge who heard the case could instigate proceedings, to they were not done on our patch Mate! and so on, ad nauseum. You will see all this in the link where I will put all their letters and documents that I have not already put on the existing links.
The recent case this week of the Scottish politician Tommy Sheridan who was done for perjury and found guilty will show you how duplicitous the Establishment of this country are. Here you have a well known person who has committed the same crimes of perjury as Liarman and he gets done for it. At a cost of £millions he goes through a long three month trial. Yet Liarman who committed over 200 acts of perjury and four acts of forgery, who is a non entity as indeed I am, has his criminal acts completely ignored by the IPO and now the Police. Now why is that I ask?
The interesting thing, and this highlights how corrupt our politicians and judiciary are, indulging in hypocrisy and lies, is that the prosecuting QC said that his acts which he admitted did not have a victim, had to be prosecuted to the full, "because perjury is a SERIOUS CRIME that cannot be ignored as it cannot be allowed to become the normal behaviour of people" Well Mr Prosecutor why is it that this man can get away Scot free with over 200 acts of PERJURY AND FORGERY, when Sheridan lied once or twice and was not involved in forgery? He did get £200,000 off the News of the World and most of us would not lose sleep over that, whereas Liarman initially lied to the Police to get me charged with perjury in order that he could get me incarcerated in jail and so collect £500,000 off Chrysler. So you tell me who is the bigger crook out of these two!!!
My requests for documents under the freedom of Information Act have been met with the same old lying by the IPO and the two Police Forces that either they can keep them away from me or they don't exist. The IPO tossed me a few scraps of evidence to keep me happy and thus be able to say they had kept to the Act requirements, but I know they are keeping the ones with the real incriminating evidence. Both Dorset & the Met have openly admitted they liaised with the IPO despite my asking them not to as all they would get is biased comments about me and them covering their dirty backsides in order to not be seen to have been at fault in not investigating my complaints that I was being subjected to perjury in ALL the six hearings 2004-2010.
So it is damn obvious that emails between them exist. I have one of them where a Mr Hayward of the IPO lies to the Dorset Police that perjury could not have been committed. Then one that the IPO did give me where he tells DC Brimicombe that I had the temerity to have a blog on the whole subject. THIS BLOG. This prompted the DC to slag me off and tell me he know knew all about me and what I was up to. Whatever that meant. Hayward says to the DC when giving him my URL (and do not forget the IPO knew of my blog because the execrable Liarman gave them the details)"I found some of the entries so shocking and offensive that beware if you read it" Well my answer to this wimp is if he and his other cronies in the IPO had not treated me like SHIT since 2000 and lied and acted corruptly, then I would not have to even have a blog or say anything about what I think of them or their actions, thus upsetting his girly sensibilities.....WOULD I...DICKHEAD!
The other two emails given me showed that as far back as 2004 and before the first of the corrupt hearings,the IPO had formed black thoughts about me PERSONALLY, as I knew they had and have. I am described as being a "difficult" person to deal with and "angry" Doesn't this show anyone that if you feel shat upon by any government department and you will not take it lying down and fight back, you suddenly become a person who is "difficult" and "angry" etc etc. They make me want to puke, these asshole civil servants, for the way they treat their paymasters...we the PUBLIC. If you read like I do, all the horror stories of other members of the Public who also have suffered at the hands of our shit civil servants in many different ways, too many to mention here, you will see my story is only normal for their behaviour.Well others may give in but there is no way I am doing that.
So at present I have reports in with the Information Commissioner about the refusal to give me the documents I have asked for from the Dorset Police and the Met and the IPO. Then I have reported the IPO to the Parliamentary Ombudsman for perverting the course of justice by interfering in my efforts to get the Police to investigate criminal acts by telling lies to them about me and what constitutes perjury. I have a request in before that fat slob Ken Clarke who I cannot stand (as he is a lover of criminals and a typical upper class judicial twit) to investigate why the OJC & JACO did not act against that corrupt judge Hobbs QC.
However I really have NO FAITH WHATSOEVER IN ANY OF THESE BODIES, GOING ON WHAT I HAVE READ ABOUT THEM. ESPECIALLY THE PARLIAMENTARY OMBUDSMAN WHO HAS IN THE PAST REFUSED TO ACT OVER THE GOINGS ON OF THE IPO. The IPCC I have never dealt with nor the ICO, but like I say all such bodies that I have tried over many years HAVE NEVER ONCE UPHELD ANY COMPLAINT DESPITE MUCH EVIDENCE OF WRONG DOING AND LAW BREAKING. In this country there is a concerted effort by ALL such supposedly independent bodies set up to supposedly to protect us....the PUBLIC, from the corruption and abuses of various government bodies and institutions. They are really all smoke and mirrors set up by the establishment just so they can say how caring and good they are at protecting us the people, that put them where they are with their fat wages and bonuses and pensions, on our backs.
So do have a look at my book ( which will soon be published and distributed to EVERY person I feel shoud see it) which details this sad and horrendous story in more detail and look at the supporting documents of evidence, that is if the abuses of us interests you....THE ABUSES BY SO CALLED DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENTS AGAINST THEIR PEOPLE. In reality living in this country is no better than living in RUSSIA or some other despotic dictators kingdom. Only in this country our tormentors do it in a more devious and civilised way, without the bumping off of anyone they have abused. They tie you up in knots of lies and corrupt actions until you give in or go mad or emigrate.
APART FROM ALL THE ABOVE RECORDING OF our GOVERNMENT MUCK......HAVE A MERRY XMAS GOOD FOLKS AND FUCK ALL LIARS, GOVERNMENTS AND THEIR LACKEYS, MAY THEY ALL ROT IN HELL...
THE BASTARDS!!!

Intellectual Poperty Office & Corrupt Police.

2010-12-11T09:41:00.000-08:00

WHEN IT COMES TO THE SUBJECT OF CORRUPTION IT SEEMS TO ME THAT THE WHOLE OF THE CIVIL SERVICE IS CORRUPT ALONG WITH MUCH OF THE JUDICIARY. IT IS LIKE LIVING IN RUSSIA BUT WITHOUT PEOPLE GETTING KNOCKED OFF!!
I have recounted to you about the corrupt Judge Hobbs along with his crony in the IPO, Mr James, head of the Tribunal Section, and now I can tell you about corrupt British Police. Both the Dorset Police and the Met have refused to investigate my assertions about Liarmans forgery and perjury committed in all his hearings and at the trial he instigated against me in 2000. In their corruption and collusion with the IPO they have tried to brush all that aside by saying perjury could not have been committed at a tribunal as all the evidential statements were not made under oath. This of course is a nonsense from the legal angle as if you read the Perjury Act perjury is committed when you make false statements under a statement of truth which is what you do when making IPO tribunal statements.
Then when I proved that was trash, they tried another load of crap on me by saying it was an ongoing CIVIL case.
Well first of all there is NO ONGOING CASE and secondly perjury and forgery are clearly criminal acts.!!!!!
Then they said that I should get a lawyer and take my own legal action when this preposterous statement is so ludicrous I do not know how the have the gall to make it.For it is the same as saying to someone who has been severely beaten up almost to death by saying no we will not investigate this as it is a civil matter between you and the criminal who beat you up. WHAT ARE THE POLICE THERE FOR?????????Not to investigate criminal acts of crime, it seems.
The Dorset Police used the excuse to say that as the Judge at the trial did not ask for perjury and forgery to be investigated, then that is the end of it. Yet if you read the CPS website on perjury it clearly states that this is not so. In any case I was charge pretty damn quick by the Dorset Police when Busbridge reported me for the same alleged offences. There was no telling him to pursue it by civil means etc.
It all adds up to a very smelly state of affairs. Is there a whiff of Masonic goings on here I wonder? For Liarmans right hand man was an ex copper and we all know how Masonic influences there are in the Police and most probably also in the civil service incl the IPO!!It would explain the inexplicable way the IPO have consistently denied me justice even in the face of overwhelming proof of Liarmans forgery and perjury and the stealing of my business and IP.
So now I have started the grinding course of taking my complaints about the Police through the process which has to start with their internal complaints procedures. Let me tell you that this is expressly designed to waste time and thwart you. The first stage has resulted in a refusal still, not to investigate it. Now it is at the second stage and both Dorset and the Met are sitting on it and wasting my time, but the outcome is a foregone conclusion....yet another refusal.
So then it will be onto the IPCC who will also do nothing and then it will be to the Justice Minister. Who knows what all these corrupt bastards will do, but in the meantime a crook, a criminal and a conman liar gets away with it.
THIS PROVING YET AGAIN THAT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN THIS COUNTRY FAVOURS THE CROOKS AND CRIMINALS AND NOT THEIR VICTIMS!!!!!!!!! AND KEN CLARKE IS THE EPITOME OF THIS AS HE SITS ON MY COMPLAINT ABOUT A CORRUPT JUDGE AND HE DOES NOTHING!!!!!

Intellectual Poperty Office All documents for viewing.

2010-12-09T12:04:00.000-08:00

AS PROMISED....ALL THE DOCUMENTS OF WORTH FOR THIS SORRY CASE ARE NOW AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING..........................
You can now see for yourself that I have been telling the absolute truth about everything that has gone on in this case. All the lies of Busbridge there for you to see and all the crap he filled the IPO's heads with, WHICH THE BASTARDS BELIEVED. Of course they had their agenda anyway to want to believe him and disbelieve me.
You can also see how Liarman Busbridge is passing off my product on his website as his own creation by showing articles where the reader is told that the car shown is a "Cobretti Viper" when in actual fact it is one of mine being either a Brightwheel
or a Classic Replicas Viper. Some cars are actually cars I built with my own hands like the Red V12 one and the Viper4 Cortina car.
The list of documents is in date order so that if you also read the book which I have written and which details the whole history in minute detail, which you can now also download, the documents are in order of the history as shown in the book.

LATEST EVENTS. Like I have said a number of times, I am not sitting here doing nothing. Every day I am working to bring this bastard to book and to get Justice against him. You will see my efforts in the book, which by the way will be published and distributed in the very near future in the New Year. This will go out to a long list of people, which I have drawn up. Members of Parliament, the media, University Law schools so students can see how the IPO deal with people who create IP and many IP barristers and specialists. The name of the IPO will be shit after it goes out,if I have anything to do with it, so I hope they enjoy it.
I am doing everything I can to get Liarman arrested and charged with forgery and perjury independently of the IPO. It isn't easy but I will keep on until the equally bastard Police get off their overpaid fat arses and do what we the Public pay them to do. Arrest Criminals like Busbridge.
Like I said already there are a number of avenues that I can go down to get Lairman and the IPO and I am going down all of them. I am also trying to get that bastard corrupt IPO, Judge Hobbs investigated for his corrupt handling of the appeal by Busbridge in 2006, against the Landau hearing which went against him. That report is with Ken Clarke, but I a not holding my breath there as he is a fat Tosser anyway and one of the Judiciary cartel Establishment.
If the Police do not act it will be with the IPCC to investigate their corrupt collusion with the IPO to deny me JUSTICE.
I am also trying to get both the Police and the IPO to release copies of emails and letters between their two corrupt bodies. I have already got a couple of interesting documents from the IPO which clearly show that even in 2004 the IPO were viewing me as a difficult person and making personal remarks about me.(thus showing bias) So what they are now thinking about me now after 8 years of hassle with them???? and these will be thoughts that will have had effects on how I was treated in all the hearings. Which is bloody obvious anyway by the unbelievable decisions that they have made. Of course they are not showing me ALL the documents so it will have to go all the way to the Information Commissioner. Thepoint is all their stupid actions in denying me, goes against them anyway as by refusIng to rElease documents ONLY SHOWS THEY HAVE SOMETHING TO HIDE!!!! idiots.
The same with the Police and here they are refusing to show me ANY douments even though I already have three that show their dirty deeds, and how they are behaving by refusing to investigate criminal acts by Liarman. So they too will be reported to the INF/Comm.
So it goes on 'til the bastard is nailed. Dogged Perserverance is the name of the
game and I have buckets of that and always have had.

Intellectual Property & complaints about them, update.

2010-11-12T05:51:00.000-08:00

I haven't been doing nothing for the past month or so, far from it. However what I have been doing I want to keep quiet about so as Liarman Busbridge doesn't know what I am up to. My efforts to get justice will take time as you are dealing with our wonderful government and all its dysfunctional departments.
Soon I will attach to this blog ALL the important documents that were involved with this case. So those of you that wish to see for yourself the statements that both I and liarman put into the arena, plus all the documentary evidence, you will soon be able to see those.
Those of you that have used the link to my other blog about Cobretti Engineering, will have seen on that blog that I have attached the manuscript of a book I have been writing on this sick saga.
That manuscript was not an up to date document and now the book has been finished and is ready for printing. So I will remove the old manuscript and put in the completed one.
The book will go out free to as many people that I think should see it in government and the justice system and including as many Intellectual Property lawyers and Professors of Law in Universities. Also copies will go to as many in the media that I think could take an interest. In other words anyone who may be able to help me 'get justice' for it is painfully obvious that no government department is interested as they are all too busy covering up their backsides and helping each other to do that.
So keep looking in for those.

Intellectual Property Office & complaints about them. Viper History.

2010-10-06T07:23:00.000-07:00

We can now easily see that the Intellectual Property Office since 2004 when the first hearing by Reynolds took place and right through to this last Invalidity hearing in front of Salthouse, have overseen hearings that were riddled with faulty decision making, and the ignoring of their own TMA Law or their Rules.

1/ REYNOLDS; Would not accept a perfectly good evidence document that would have demolished Liarmans case/

Would not accept a valid legally made evidence statement made by my solicitor for a higher Court. Had he accepted it would have shown beyond doubt that Liarman was my agent.

Made several wrongful statements in order to back up his decision. saying I had abandoned the mark/ I had not controlled the advertising of Liarman/ Liarman could take over the T/M after BRL ceased business even thought there was no evidence they owned it/ ignored the law on abandonment/ saying wrongly that I had not used my T/M during my relationship with Liarman and that gave him the right to it, when the evidence showed otherwise.

2/ FOLEY: He proceeded to look at the application under the TMA Section 64 (1) when he should have proceeded under 64 (5).

Made mistakes by saying it was not an error in the Register when it was an error.

Said he will not revisit previous hearings, then spends much time doing this.

Said I made an application for Rectification when I never did.

He ignored partnership laws which said that Liarmans take over of his brothers assets were illegal.

Obviously did not understand how the IPO should react to bankruptcy.

Made unsubstantiated claims about Martin Busbridge accepting an indemnity. (Which can be shown by Martins later Affidavits)

3/ ANNAND;

Intellectual Poperty Office & complaints about them. Viper History.

2010-10-06T04:02:00.000-07:00

I have today been notified that indeed Liarman Busbridge did not offer up any statements of evidence for the Hobbs appeal. I find this astonishing as what he said in his Statement of Grounds was utter irrelevant tosh and certainly not valid legal argument. In fact it wasn't even legal argument but just him whinging about how hard done by he was.

This explains why Hobbs merely referred to the fact that he had read it. Now had this been a pukka appeal hearing and not the corrupt party it was, Hobbs would have referred to those ground in at least some ways. As it was irrelevant crap he kept away from saying anything about it.

It pretty much nails this hearing as the utterly corrupt tea party it was, designed solely to allow the IPO's golden boy, Liarman to get away from having his trade mark taken from him as Landau said it should, and eventually to be able to allow them to take away mine. That would then stop me from suing them as they knew I hadn't the money to do that, unless some fairy God Mother came along in the form of a kindly IP lawyer who thought his profession was being brought into disrepute and wanted to do the right thing in the form of a civic duty, and help me right all the despicable things the IPO have done and allowed to be done by Liarman. Pigs might fly.

So on this theme I have to tell you once again how unlikely that seems to be. For I have been trying for some time now to find a lawyer who would just answer a series of 17 legal questions I want answers to. If I could get these answers I could then show that legal minds have looked at certain aspects of the whole history of the IPO's actions since 1992 and they have broken rules again and again. (if I am right of course and I think mostly I am)
So I approach no less than FOUR lawyers with whom I had been associated with over the past ten years. Either they had given me legal assistance by answering questions or they had represented me when I was bringing my fight against Chrysler to a head. I reckoned it better to try and use people who knew me. The first gave a terse "NO way" the second wanted me to pay him tens of thousands so he could start a legal action against the IPO and Liarman and refused to answer just the questions. The third said they were too busy, and the fourth hasn't replied.

I think that most lawyers are only interested in the big picture, the big money spinning case. Wasting time answering a few questions is not their forte. Or it could be that they just do not want to take on the IPO as it may give them black marks in their future contacts with them.
Maybe they think that their is some case going on because I keep getting asked what case am I involved in, and this spooks them as they do not want me spouting their remarks, as they may have got their questions wrong. All the questions I think are quite straight forward and deal mainly with questions of law as it stands. Whatever it further brings them down in my eyes.

In this country as say opposed to the USA there is virtually no Pro Bono work done and I think that speaks volumes for the way British lawyers regard the poorer part of the British Public and that their hearts are wallets and not hearts. Of course I will get my answers one way or the other and then I will be able to present a case for suing the IPO.

Another interesting subject I can report is that I have just read a very interesting book called "A country fit for criminals" The name of this book really caught my eye when I saw it in my local library. It is written by a very experienced man who spent most of his life in prison work and work with the Probation Service. Here are some interesting and true quotes that relate to my case:-

1/ WHILST WRITING THIS BOOK WAS CONTACTED BY A NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO HAD BECOME DESPERATE IN THEIR SEARCH FOR PROTECTION FROM CRIMINALS. ALL SPOKE OF THEIR TOTAL FAILURE TO GET LOCAL POLITICIANS, MP'S CRIMINAL JUSTICE OFFICIALS, POLICE OR INDEED ANYONE TO TAKE NOTICE OF THEIR DESPERATE SITUATIONS.

2/ THE ROTTING INFLUENCE OF THIS EVER GROWING MOUNTAIN OF CRIMES WHICH ARE NEVER DEALT WITH FROM PSYCOLOGICAL, LEGAL OR JUSTICE STANDPOINT IS FAST UNDERMINING OUR FAITH IN LAW AND ORDER AND OUR BELIEF IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM.

3/ ALL GOVERNMENTS SINCE THE 60'S HAVE GONE OUT OF THEIR WAY TO INTRODUCE POLICIES THAT HAVE ENCOURAGED CRIMINALS TO BECOME MORE CRIMINAL. NUMEROUS OBSTACLES HAVE BEEN PUT IN THE WAY OF ARRESTING AND CONVICTING THEM.

4/ WHEN I STARTED AS A POLICE PROSECUTOR EVERYONE WANTED TO PROSECUTE. THE POLICE WANTED TO PROSECUTE, THE COURTS WANTED TO DEAL WITH CASES AND MAGISTRATES WANTED TO SENTENCE. NOW NO ONE WANTS TO DO ANY OF THESE THINGS.

5/ PROSECUTORS MUST ALWAYS THINK CAREFULLY ABOUT THE INTERESTS
OF A CRIME WHEN DECIDING WHETHER OR NOT TO PROSECUTE AN OFFENDER. HOWEVER IN PRACTICE THE GROUNDS ON WHICH THEY HAVE TO MAKE THIS DECISION RESOLVES SO MUCH AROUND COSTS AND THE NEEDS TO SAVE MONEY THAT THE VICTIMS ARE RARELY GIVEN THOUGHT.

6/ THE PURPOSE OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IS TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC FROM CRIME AND PROVIDE JUSTICE FOR THOSE VICTIMISED BY CRIMINALS.

7/ OVER 90 PER CENT OF OFFENCES ARE GOING UNPUNISHED.....THE GOVERNMENTS DETERMINATION 'TO FILTER OUT' AS MANY OFFENDERS AS POSSIBLE FROM THE JUSTICE SYSTEM BY WHATEVER MEANS, IN ORDER TO CONTROL EXPENDITURE, RATHER THAN BRING THEM TO JUSTICE.

All those statements cover my situation in one way or the other and they show just how this country has deteriorated in my lifetime. This CONMAN BUSBRIDGE had played this system
as it is now and has got away with it at each turn. So from day one when he could see that he could lie to everyone in authority and get away with it, it emboldened him to go on and commit more lies because he knew he would be believed and no one would dig even a little and expose his lies. The lies just got more and more bold and outrageous and now we have reached the end and he was able to con the IPO completely all along the line and they have been more concerned about a criminal than me, THE VICTIM!! (As shown by the remark Annand said when she said she was really sorry for all the cases he had had to go through!!)

There is on the web a similar story to mine which I came across yesterday. A chap the same age I me had been conned out of his IP but this time not by a member of the public, but by no less than members of a government department......Business Links. Now I know something about these people as I too aproached them some years back to see if I could get funding to expand my business. I personally thought it was just another smoke and mirrors case, all talk and no action. I never got anywhere and dropped them as yet another example of government uselessness.

However in his case he gave them his business plan to prove he had a viable proposition. He too needed funds to be able to start it. These Link assholes saw it was a good viable project and stole all his plans while telling him that is not a goer. They are now operating a viable and ongoing business that is based on his plans. He like me has been totally unable to get justice, due to the fact that in this asshole of an unequal country of ours that favours the criminals and the feckless and the rich, there is no longer any legal aid. There is more to hsi story than I have put here and if you are interested go to his website www.tfc-training.com/intellectual_property_theft.htm

Intellectual Poperty Office & complaints about them. Viper History.

2010-10-05T15:16:00.000-07:00

In my last post I mentioned that Annand said that she thought that Foley had first of all
applied the wrong Trade Marks Act to this appeal, then she did not agree with the way Foley had talked about previous hearings when he should only be dealing with rectification and not revisiting old hearings, nor did she agree with his bringing up the question of Insolvency, you have to wonder about the veracity of any of the hearings I have been involved in.

I have long thought that our justice system stinks, no matter what arm of it you look at. I guaranty that if you presented any long and complex case to say 6 different hearings or Court cases and the peopel unvolved in those hearings or court cases were in each case totally different, yet they were presented with exactly the same evidence, you would get 6 different interpretations and 6 different results.
The same seems to happen in IPO cases because IP law and rules are to my mind, so mind bogglingly complex and open to different interpreations depending on who is hearing them It also appears to me that because of the endless rules it would take a hearing officer with a mind like a computor to be able to remeber all these laws, let alone what they all mean.

Each hearing as I say has shown to me that each hearing officer did not have ahandle on the evidence before him nor any overall understanding of all the laws that could apply to that case. So in the Reynolds case he made gross errors in interpretation of the laws and failed to treat good evidence in a way it should have been.
Landau obviously took a completely different look at the same evidence and came up with a completey different decision.
Hobbs seemed to also think that what Landau decreed did not tally with his ideas as could be seen by what he and James discussed in the 32 pages of case history many of which covered the same grounds as Landau did, but came to different interpretations
Foley it appears made mistakes as I have pointed out and Annand said so, so her interpretations were different to Foley's and she saw what Landau had covered and said in a different way too.

This all makes me believe that all these people don't know what the hell they are doing. Then when you look at all the mistakes various IPO workers have made over the years as well and that is evidenced in all my letters and paperwork I have from day one in 1992 to 2010. All in all this lot are an incompetent rabble who it is hard to have any faith in at all. And that is on top of the fact that I believe that the IPO have worked all these hearings to come out with the results they wanted, anyway. This for the reasons I outlined in the last post.

I am busy researching for info on how appeals should be conducted as I have intimated. I have told you already how the T/Sol are prevaricating on whether to let me know what evidence Liarman put in to the Hobbs appeal and whether they have guidelines for judges hearing appeals. Once I get what info I need, then I will be putting it all together and showing how the Hobbs appeal was definitely crooked.
I have already sent in my complaint about the Hobbs behaviour at that hearing and his slagging off of me and how the OJC and the ombudsman have whitewashed my complaints to them, to no less than Ken Clarke MP, the Head Of the Justice Ministry and this through my MP. I will push my MP for him to act on my behalf on this as I am determined to bring this rat Hobbs to book.
Next stop if all that fails is the media with my evidence.

Intellectual Property Office & complaints about them. Hobbs Appeal.

2010-10-04T08:53:00.000-07:00

I have now been sent the transcript of my own appeal against the decision of Hearing Officer Foley in favour of the 'Big Liar/Conman/Liarman'

Professor Annand heard it if you remember and have read all this blog. Why I wanted to read it is because I obviously could not remember all that I said or more importantly, what she said. I did remember that she mentioned several times that she could not deal with previous matters and had to stick strictly to matters concerning only Foley. THIS IN STARK CONTRAST TO HOW HOBBS HEARD THE APPEAL BY LIAR. Again if you have been reading all this story you will remember that I have accused Hobbs of corruption for the way he conducted his hearing did and not deal with any evidence that Liarman may have put in. That all he did was give advice to Liarman and slag me off. Which I was positive, was all against all the rules, not only applying to Judges, but rules that applied to how appeals had to be conducted.

Now having read the Annand transcript it is perfectly clear that this bastard corrupt Judge Hobbs is as guilty as hell. The way the two appeals were heard has to be seen to be believed, for it is as plain as your nose he never conducted any of that hearing as he legally should have done.

I have been trying to get the Treasury Solicitors who appoint these supposedly independent persons, to tell me what Rules or Laws they work under to control how these appeals are conducted. To show that there are indeed such rules the A/P's have to work to, just let me tell you exactly what Annand said:-

1/ What Landau did or did not say is not within my jurisdiction to decide upon."

2/ "When the boundaries of what is happening have not been appreciated"

3/ "What Hobbs said is nothing to do with me"

4/ "They were different proceedings, so it is not upto me to say anything"

5/ "It is not my jurisdiction"

6/ "I must say I have no power to say anything about Mr Reynolds decision ....or your fight with Chrysler"

YOU COULDN'T BE CLEARER THAN THAT, IN MY ESTIMATION, especially the remark about the fight I had with Chrysler, for Hobbs mentions that when he slagged me off. It clearly shows that the way Hobbs conducted his hearing was not only against Judges rules but against other rules, which if the IPO have told me correctly are called Civil Procedure Rules. (I will look those up and see what I see)

The IPO kept telling me that they couldn't advise me on how an appeal before an appointed person should be conducted, as they are solely under the jurisdiction of the T/Sol and they have proved for the past week to be as slippery as an eel.

They know I am after Hobbs and they know that should they give me the information I am after, they will be helping my efforts to bring him to heel and justice. Their Mr Prior who I have had dealings with before and found to be a totally unhelpful twerp, has proved to be as unhelpful as ever this time, too. I asked him to let me know if Liarman had put in any evidence statements into the appeal as Hobbs never mentioned any such statements. In fact Hobbs never discussed anything Liarman had said in his defence. Nor did he discuss the decisions of Landau which Liarman was appealing. It was all advice, advice and more advice. Whereas with Annand she talked non stop about my evidence and Liarman's evidence and only about what Foley had said or did not say. As he was the Hearing Officer of the hearing I was appealing, then that is OK.

In my many thoughts on how Hobbs conducted this sham appeal, one has to ask again, why did he do this and now I think I can tell you my appraisal or hypothesis of his actions..........................
The IPO have known for a long time (actually since about 2002 at least) that I have been so pissed off with them over their crap actions, and incompetence that has meant Liarman has been able to continue since 1992 to steal business off me, by his stealing my designs and trade mark from me. They have helped him do this in many ways which are adequately described throughout this blog.

I have lost a whole lot of money through all this, my business, and my health and happiness. So damn true I want to sue the ass off the IPO and they know that. In other words I have lost a lot, so have a strong reason to want to sue them. On the other hand Liarman has no reason to sue them at all. Quite the opposite. For why would he want to bite off the hand that has been feeding and helping him all these years? Knowing that, who do you think the IPO would have favoured, to get this Trade Mark? Anyone with half a brain would be able to see that if the IPO could wangle it by any means and even foul means, to give Liarman the mark, then the chances of them being sued would diminish to almost zero.

Being civil servants they could not take the chance that I could put them up on the dock where all their transgressions and incompetence would be laid bare. High up managers wouldn't want to be seen as useless as it would effect their jobs and pensions and whatever. So like all true corrupt assholes that proliferate in the huge State machinery we now have, they worked out their dirty plans, probably starting in 2002 and have been at it ever since. Of course once they started it there was no going back and in they went ever deeper. Landau nearly upset the apple cart but Hobbs was no doubt roped in the extricate them.

Now why would Hobbs do that? Well as I have said many times up to now, he is in up to his neck with the IPO and is obviously very much beholden to them. Most of his work is for them and no doubt if you read between the lines at the number of times his name crops up on IPO websites,
you will see like I see that he is mentioned all over the place. I expect the IPO worship him like a God.(He probably thinks he is, too) So if the IPO approached him he would fall over himself to please them and keep very much in with them. It would do his street cred no end with them. The Treasury Solicitors will no doubt be also well in with the IPO shower, on the premise that all civil servants stick together to protect each other. They remind me of a daisy chain....the bastards.

The Insolvency Service who were supposed to deal with Liarman's bankruptcy did exactly the same incompetent job as the IPO and then lied through their back teeth to cover up the fact that Liarman pulled a fast one over them over the trade mark and keeping from them that he was trying to flog it to Chrysler for £500K when he is supposed to be BANKRUPT!!!!! They should line all civil servants up and shoot the bloody lot as they are all useless, and then start again with strict controls over them and how many of them there are. Of course that asshole Blair upped the numbers of Labour voters by taking on millions more of the useless civil service bastards, just like he did by letting millions of immigrants in, that he knew would also vote labour. Oh what a shit country this is!!

Going back to this woman Annand. Even though it appears she did follow the rules of how an appeal has to be conducted, for me that does not let her off the hook and make her whiter than white, or even shows she is independent as she boasted she was and would be so. For there were a few remarks that showed to me that she too is probably in the pay of the IPO, for don't forget she too works for the IPO as a hearing officer so she CANNOT be independent in matters where I am fighting the IPO as much as I am fighting Liarman.At the beginning of this appeal she spent much time on dealing with my request to have allowed further evidence out of time. This because Foley had in explaining his decision had put at least 50% of his reasoning into the fact that Liarman must be allowed to have the mark, said that he legally owned the application for the Mark. This because the Insolvency Service had sent Liarman a letter confirming that they had not had any interest in the mark asset. This letter had been sent not long before the hearing, so was recent, yet when I contacted them to complain that they were helping an ex bankrupt who had no claim to the mark, I was told they couldn't comment on what they had been told by Liarman back in 1993 or what they had thought about this asset. This because they had destroyed all the files to his bankruptcy. Yet they could say to Liarman with positivity that they had not had any interest in it. How could they say this now if they had no files to consult?????? Yet another example of behaviour of a government department that begs many questions.
So I tried to have it out with them and this took a long time being as civil servants only work at one pace....snails pace. The time limit for me to get in my evidence for the appeal before Annand went by and hence why when I had as many answers as I was going to get, I tried to put them in. During the first half of the hearing she spent a lot of time trying to blind me with science. Telling me that most of what I was trying to put in was already in the files of the Registry. Quite frankly I could not be bothered arguing with her as I sensed she had made her mind up anyway, so after my telling her a number of my thoughts which I felt was wasting my time anyway, but I wanted it down on record anyway, I let it go. My point here without stating every thing she said or I said is that it became plain she did not want to see why I was trying to address what had been said by Foley. After all the appeal was arguing why I thought Foley was wrong in his decision making. That seemed as if she just did not want to see that and she made all these excuses for not allowing it. This to me shows that she had a certain program made up, already on her mind and it did not include agreeing with me at all.
Then she caps it all by intimating that all the waffle about the Insolvency matters not a jot as it has nothing to do with what the hearing by Foley was all about. That was to allow Liarman to Rectify the Records. In plain English that means getting his brother Martins name taken off the application to register the mark and ultimately to end up with only his name shown as owner of the mark. She says that whatever way this appeal goes Liarman will still have his name on the ownership of the mark. Either as sole owner or joint owner.
Now Landau had clearly said it should be in the joint names and trading as Cobretti Engineering. As Cobretti had gone bankrupt and was a partnership that no longer traded then it should die a death. All that as you will have seen was ignored by the IPO when Liarmans appeal against that was dropped.
She then goes onto saying that in any case, all the arguments one way or the other about the Insolvency Service etc has nothing to do with the appeal. I then point out that the appeal is appealing what Foley brought up and he made a big deal about the Insolvency. She replies that she does not have to agree with Foley in any case.
So once again we have yet another hearing were the officer hearing it disagrees with what previous hearing officers have said or the path they have gone down. This opens another can of worms which I will not go into here as I will deal with that in my next post. She then goes onto discussing the actual Foley decision and my appeal against that, which I will not go into in great detail, for reasons you will see. I have already commented elsewhere on all her arguments on that in back posts of this blog.
She at one point says that in her opinion that what Landau said in his decision and that I complained it had not been enacted, is shown by her comment; " Can I just say that Landaus decision in fact, evaporated because Mr Landaus decision was concerned with assignments that were withdrawn" Quite why when she has already firmly stated that she will not be drawn into or comments on other cases, beats me. But it shows that maybe she wanted to defend the IPO and their actions by saying this erroneous remark. I pointed out to her that she was wrong as Landau did not just deal with assignments but dealt with legal matters over the way the partnership broke up and more. She then shuts up by saying: "What Mr Landau said or did not say is not within my jurisdiction to decide upon" So why did she make that comment about why it "evaporated"? More like it was just bloody well ignored, I say!!
Now she nails her colours to the mast by saying something that for me shows she has sympathy for Liarman. She says; " Really I feel for both of you, in that you have had to do a lot of proceedings".(good grammar for a Professor!) Now I know she has read all the history of my fight against Liarman stealing my IP. Yet astonishingly she says she has sympathy for Liarman, yet any proceedings he has had to undergo is entirely his own fault for being a lying ,stealing, thief of my IP property. So why has she got sympathy for this criminal? She will have seen what he has been up to and she will have seen he is nothing more than a conman thief.
Then she shows that in fact she has already made up her mind about this appeal before it has even taken place, for she states: " I will give the decision in writing. It should not be too long getting to you" Indeed it was written up and delivered within a WEEK and that is unprecedented because all other decisions have taken months to get to me, even as much as EIGHT months. This shows to me that she knew before hand what her decision was and what she would say. The actual appeal therefore was a waste of time for me as what was its purpose? It was all just smoke and mirrors once again. Make it look like you are getting heard and something you say and bring up at the hearing can have an effect. Bullshit!

Intellectual Property Office & complaints about them. Latest facts brought to light.

2010-09-28T04:02:00.000-07:00

I have in this blog talked about so called evidence given into all the hearings by the conman RB and how most of it was irrelevant trash and denigratory to myself. How the IPO allowed all this nonsense. Now I have unearthed an IPO document which states:- "The information declared in the documents should be strictly confined to the points at issue" So once again you see that throughout all the hearings in this case (some 7) RB filled ALL his evidence statements with irrelevant nonsense and denigratory trash about me. The IPO stood by and allowed all this in defiance of their own rules.
In his last lot of so called evidence statements (for his Invalidity action against my registration)he even sent them a thick wad of copies of the pages of this very blog. Yet Lord Wolf has said "poorly drafted and elliptically worded documents can lead to confusion and to a waste of time and resources for both parties"
So why have the IPO consistently ignored what RB put into ALL his statements? This at complete variance with their own rules and laws.
I have also talked about the corrupt way the Hobbs Appeal Hearing was conducted and I am now researching just what is allowed to be heard and how an appeal has to be conducted. I have asked the Treasury Solicitors to provide me with any guidance documents as to how an appeal should be conducted. So far they are dragging their feet on that one and we all know why. So we shall see.
I have also got RB's Statement of Grounds for that case. He lists 6 reasons for appeal ling and NOT ONE OF THEM HAS ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE DECISION REASONS THAT LANDAU GAVE IN 2005 FOR RB TO LOSE HIS REGISTRATION!!
So much for Statement of Grounds should only contain statements that are strictly to do with the points at issue. Once again why did the IPO and the T/Sol ignore that?
I have also asked the T/Sol for a transcript of my own appeal against the Foley decision. Prof Annand had said she was only going to look at the issues in hand which is what she should have done. When I get this (if the T/Sol don't invent lies for not being able to provide this) I can then compare how the Hobbs appeal was conducted as opposed to how she conducted a similar appeal hearing. I will report on that when I can.

Intellectual Property Office & Complaints about them. Corrupt IPO

2010-09-16T08:42:00.001-07:00

Now to the reasons why this corrupt mob, the IPO, must have decided to act they way they did.
As in the previous post where I have said they kicked off in 1992 by behaving in a strange way.
first they refuse to accept bona-fide evidence from my Patent Agent that Busbridge had been an agent of mine and therefore had no legal claim to my Trade Mark. Then they ignore our evidence that his partnership was no longer in being and that as the application he had been made in the partnership name, surely this now meant the application had to fail.
Then they had held back Busbridges application to register and let mine proceed even though he had applied first. So by the end of the nineties and into early 2.000's I was mightily pissed off with this mob and this feeling was further exacerbated when they allowed Busbridge to put in an application to make my Trade Mark Invalid. So in late 2001 I started strongly complaining to the IPO and their Chief Executive Officer.
I made it plain that I thought that the IPO were incompetent and that they were costing me money in lost profits by having allowed Busbridge to be able to trade with my Trade Mark. So they from that date were on notice that I was of a mind to sue them. What they did not know is I really had no means to be able to do that. I simply could not afford to do it and if I had, I would have done it long ago. In fact had I had Loads O' Money I would have shut Busbridge up, back in 1992 and have dealt with the IPO too.
I have the belief that this could be one of the reasons why the IPO wanted me out of the way. Also you have to believe that civil servants are well known for wreaking revenge on people they see as a threat or they want to shut them up. You read story after story of the tricks they pull to do this, so I would not be the first. They are renowned for wanting their own way and will do anything to get their own way. So a powerful argument there, for their behaviour.
Then you have to ask questions about what was the relationship between Chrysler and the IPO
in the beginning. I know full well what American companies are capable of doing having been in business there. The Yanks are the most corrupt of the so called leading and most civilised nations. They will stop at nothing for the almighty dollar.
Chrysler wanted to register their sportscar, which in the USA they also called Viper, in the UK and Europe. They probably thought they would sell loads here and they had a race series lined up for it, to promote it in Europe & the UK. So they would not be happy that their efforts in the UK were being thwarted. They had the money and the services of top UK IP lawyers to do what was necessary to GET IT REGISTERED. What we have to ask is how far were they willing to go?
In my mind and knowing Yanks intimately as I do, I wouldn't trust Chrysler as far as I could throw the fat bastard Yanks. The way they dealt with me over about 10 years was execrable and typically Yanky. They twisted and turned and you couldn't trust their word for one second. It would certainly answer my thoughts and questions as to why the IPO behaved the way it did even from early 1992. Maybe one day I will prove it, and you can be assured I will not stop trying to find out.

Intellectual Property Office & Complaints about them. My Blog.

2010-09-16T03:09:00.001-07:00

In my post, of two back, where I talk about my local Police, I need to show you just how these devious civil servants work. When I had a meeting with this useless copper Brimicombe and he had a fit of the intimidations against me because I wouldn't let him get away with saying perjury had not been committed, he let the cat out of the bag.
He said "I have read all your blog" and it was said with the tone of voice that telegraphed that he thought negatively about it. I would say that in his mind, after he had read it, he thought one or all of the following:-
1/ I was a nutter hell bent on revenge against the IPO and or Busbridge.
2/ What I have said and how I have said it in this blog is outrageous.
3/ That I was telling lies and none of what I have said is true.
4/ That what I have said and how I have said it shows I am a real nasty character and should therefore be dealt with by them as such.

Now what you have to understand here is how did he know I had a blog running on the IP issues?
For what I have not told you is that Busbridge in his efforts to blacken my name, as he has done consistently since day one, sent the IPO a copy of my blog in amongst his so called evidence at the last hearing in January. He said he was doing this as an act of civil goodness to show the IPO what an awful character I was. He made a point of telling the IPO that I had said nasty things about them. Well I damn well would wouldn't I? For that is the whole point of the blog.....to expose the IPO AND LIAR BUSBRIDGE for what they all are.
Of course the IPO can damn well do nothing about my blog....free speech and all that, and no doubt thought that this blog is not being seen by too many people and that it would have no effect. On that score they are right but all that is about to change as I am about to make every effort to up the ability of this blog to be seen by many more people.
Back to the Police and the IPO. So the IPO tells this copper that I have the temerity to have this blog and you can just imagine what else they tell him about me as I have said already. I can imagine the torrent of personal abuse and lies against me they will have indulged in. All this to brainwash the copper against me as a person! Hence why his attitude towards me on a personal basis from when I first starting talking to him, changes to the present time and this fit he had against me.
It also explains why they decided they would not investigate it and thought up all these feeble lying excuses to do this.
This act by the IPO, of course, can be said to be an act of perverting the course of Justice. The IPO simply do not want to see me have success in any way in bringing them all to book for their lies, corruption, incompetence, failures to carry out their own Laws and Rules etc. I go even further, I now believe that in the early days there is a good chance they deliberately put my opposition application to oppose Chrysler's application to register my Mark, in front of Busbridges similar application which he PUT IN JUST BEFORE MINE. Now I am sure that their rules would say that the earlier application would be heard first. That would make sense for DO NOT FORGET I LOST MY REGISTRATION OF MY MARK THIS LAST JANUARY ON THE GROUNDS THAT BUSBRIDGE APPLIED TO REGISTER THIS MARK BEFORE I DID!!! So why wasn't this same law applied at the beginning, back in 1992?????
If you look at the course of events starting at that time, at the actions of the IPO as to when they let me and Busbridge have our applications heard, it is all out of order. WHY DID THE IPO LET ME HAVE MY APPLICATION TO OPPOSE CHRYSLERS APPLICATION TO REGISTER MY MARK VIPER, BEFORE THE APPLICATION BUSBRIDGE ALSO HAD PUT IN TO DO THE SAME???????
The Rules have to be that the person who put in the FIRST application had it heard FIRST!!
had that rule been applied in 1992, the outcome of this long saga oflies and corruption would have turned out very different and I say the IPO knew it would and it would have inevitably turned out in favour for me. By twisting things it seems that they were able to work it, minus a few glitches like the Landau decision which fucked up their schemes, to have it turn out the way they wanted it to.
I say this is yet another act of corruption by the IPO and that there were forces at play here that I have yet to find out what they were.
Then you have this alleged appeal hearing that took place in 2005 before this Judge Hobbs. This was supposed to be an appeal by Busbridge against the decision of Landau who said Busbridge had to lose his registration as I have outlined before. Now an appeal hearing is supposed to follow a pattern. Busbridge would have had to put in his statement of Grounds of Appeal, in which he outlines the LEGAL reasons he thought the Landua decision was not lawful. He may also have put in other statements of what he saw as facts to be considered by Hobbs in support of his appeal.
At the hearing Hobbs should have gone over some of those statements and asked for clairifications if needed, ask Busbridge did he want to add verbally to any of those statements, and so on. If you read the transcript of that hearing it is quite cklear that this was no APPEAL HEARING! It was nothing mnore than a MEETING between the IPO in the figure of Mr James, who is a big wig manager of the tribunal section , Hobbs the hearing Judge and Busbridge.
Straight away you have to ask, why had the IPO sent such a senior figure to the hearing as James? I say it is because this hearing has been worked out in advance by the IPO and Hobbs, who let us not forget IS NOT INDENDENT, AS HE SHOULD BE as he is virtually an employee of the IPO because of all the work he does for them, that the hearing will be a discussion and not an appeal hearing. (This is against all the Rules for appeal judges)
Why do I say this? I believe that the IPO simply did not want it to be an appeal hearing even though Busbridge had asked to appeal, because they wished Busbridge to be able to circumvent the decision of Landau and this would be a means to surrupticiously achieve this under the guise of this being an appeal hearing. It would be dressed up as such but was really just a way of guiding Busbridge towards a path were he could go down and achieve eventually, a registration in his own name and Landau could be forgotten as if it had never happened.
So this is exactly what happened. Hobbs and James engage in spending two thirds of the time that hearing took in giving advice to Busbridge under the guise that they were only talking about case history. But a proper appeal hearing does not discuss case law. Case law would show up in the decision document AFTER the appeal had been heard and the hearing officer is making out the reasons for his decision. By doing this Hobbs & the IPO can tell Busbridge, verbally, what his legal position is by by mentioning similar cases. Hobbs even makes a point of asking Busbridge after they had finished if he UNDERSTOOD ALL THAT THEY HAD TALKED ABOUT. That gave the game away as what he really was asking is, "Did you understand all the hints we gave you in all those talks?" But these arrogant bastards didn't give damn as this meeting was not attended by anyone who could blow the whistle. No ordinary IPO employees, only their top man who is in on it and of course Hobbs, who no doubt would do anything in order to higher his cred with the IPO.
Then Hobbs goes into giving Busbridge loads of advice which as I have said is illegal. All designed to show him what track he must take to circumvent the position he is in. James even openly states that if he takes this track and asks the IPO to take a stance, "THEY WILL NOT STAND IN HIS WAY" nOW IF ALL THAT IS NOT CORRUPT, I AM A MONKEYS UNCLE!
And as I have told you already Hobbs even throws in some insults about me for good measure, knowing I could not asnwer or fight back. No doubt they all thought I would never find out about all this. (Again against the Rules for Judges)
Further proof that this is what really happened and is shown by the reluctance and the lies of the IPO when I kept asking what had happened with this hearing and what was the decision. I was lied to as was my MP as to why there was a delay in finding out what the decision of the appeal was. In actual fact there was to be no decision as Busbridge had been advised to drop the appeal and go off on the path he had been advised to do so by Hobbs. The IPO wanted to keep that quiet for as long as possible so Busbridge had the time to do what he had to do. So it all came to pass that he was successful in being able to ignore the decision of Landau and to eventually get his registration of my mark and to eventually get the IPO to take my mark off me in last January.
NOW IF ALL THAT IS NOT CORRUPT I DO NOT KNOW WHAT IS!! and that is why I am saying that the IPO, Mr JAMES AND JUDGE HOBBS ARE ALL CORRUPT.
What needs to be answered is why did the IPO not want me to have registration. I will tell you why I think that is, in the next post.

Intellectual Property Office & Complaints about them. My local paper.

2010-09-15T04:28:00.000-07:00

On the theme that in this country now no one wants to know about anything that could be said to be above the low levels of tittle-tattle, gossip type crap one gets in most newspapers today. If it doesn't include sex and what footballers are upto and if it is complex and of a long standing nature, then the vacuous media of today generally won't want to know. If you are not well known that goes against you too. Maybe it's because the media know that most of its readers have no brains and only want simple sallacious stories about cult figures.
Bearing all that in mind I approached my local paper, the Bournemouth Daily Echo. Now in the past I never had any difficulty in getting the Echo to cover a general interest story that I was involved in and to do with my businesses. This fact goes back to 1975 and the business I had then and it continued through to 1985 when I started the kit car business. I had many articles written by the Echo on the successes of my business and on other matters.
Now I wrote to the current Editor, a Neal Butterworth about how I, now as an AOP in the Echo's area was being treated by the IPO and the local Police in that it had proved impossible to get justice, and how that had affected me.
Impossible to even get the police to investigate criminal acts, which is what they are there for. Those acts being over 200 incidences of perjury having been committed by you know who...Mr Lying Conman Busbridge. I even gave the Police a detailed list of each and every instance, cross referenced to the documentary evidence which showed they were perjurious and then cross referenced to each statement that they were made in, and when. In other words I had done the police's work for them. All they had to do was investigate.
Now wouldn't you think that a local newspaper would find it a credible story of concern when a person living in its area, states that he cannot get the Police to investigate a clearly committed crime? After the usual weeks of nothing done, like interviewing me to get all the facts of this matter off me. I send him an email asking why he is sitting on it and I quote this great book which touches on this very subject of how the people in this country cannot get the powers in the Establishment to act on crime and letting the Public down.
What is his response? He sarcastically says that as it is a complex story that would need him to interview both parties he doesn't think his budget would allow that. It is like me having to deal with all those civil servants who use these same excuses. Maybe the truth is that he knows someone in the Police? Or maybe he was a civil servant in the past or that he has relatives who are?
These days there are few around who have any standards and ethics or interest in the good of the people they are supposed to serve. They are only interested in their own backsides and their own little lives and how much they can earn for themselves. They do as little for others as they can. Neal Butterworth shows he falls in this category and this is not the first time his paper has shown a reluctance to cover REAL stories that affect his readers, in recent months. For his paper has ignored pleas to highlight issues about roads in the area and how dangerous they are.

Intellectual Property Office & Complaints about them. Latest.

2010-09-14T08:00:00.000-07:00

For some 13 months now I have been trying to get our wonderful Police force to charge the liar conman with multiple counts of perjury. The IPO over the years since 2002 have steadfastly refused to even look at perjury for reasons which I think I know why, but of course proving it is my next big job. Anyway I gave my local plod idiots an official notification of all the counts of perjury and all the documentary evidence that proved it had been committed.
What do they do, they get straight on the phone to the IPO and they talk them out of doing anything. I can imagine the tale they span them, like I am a nutter hell bent on causing trouble and everything had been dealt with by them and there was no problems to be dealt with etc, etc. They came back to me, and this was last August and said that the IPO were best placed to deal with it and I should give them the chance to do that at the last hearing that was coming up.
The one last January.
Well of course as you will have seen they did not deal with it, and so in August when I found that out, I went back to them. They messed me about for weeks and weeks and it seemed that they were not going to do anything. So I kept pushing them by giving them a concise list of each and every act of perjury, forgery and perverting the course of justice committed since 2002, plus the documentary evidence to back up each allegation. Still nothing, then after complaining to their Inspector that nothing was happening, I was suddenly told after three months of being messed around that they will not do anything. Their excuse being that it was not committed in their area. This completely ignoring the fact that they charged me with perjury on a bunch of perjured lies from conman, back in 1999 and for alleged perjury committed in London. It is so clear that they have been brainwashed by the IPO.
So folks if a murder you know has been committed in Hampshire it would be a waste of time going to our Dorset Dickheads because they won't want to know! Well I suppose that is what you get with a load of country bumpkins acting as coppers!!!
I also had to put up with these raving corrupt dickheads saying that the IPO had said that it was impossible for conman to have committed perjury, as all the statements had been heard in a tribunal where no oath had been taken. Another example of corrupt excuses from the IPO as we all know that statements made to tribunals come under the same Perjury Act 1911 (amended).
They think you are so stupid that you will believe this lying shit.
So the fight goes on in a number of fresh ways and it is nowhere near over yet, so Lying Conman Busbridge if your reading this I will get you in the end, asshole! One way or the other,legally!
Now I have also reported the corruption committed by the corrupt Judge Hobbs QC at the appeal hearing by conman in 2005, which I have reported way back in this blog, to Kenneth Clarke. This as he is the Head of the Judiciary. Of course this blubbery, scruffy oaf, didn't even have the decency and nor did his staff, to acknowledge receipt of my complaint. So that necessitated getting my MP to act once more as a postman and deliver a second copy of the first one and in person. A month has gone by and still not a peep. I am taking bets as to how that will end up.
This is so far, a never ending campaign by the Establishment to cover up for each other. Not one department has EVER dealt with the criminal acts of this conman.
I urge anyone reading this blog to read an excellent book by a David Fraser called "A Land Fit for Criminals" Now immediately the title says it all and I have only read a few pages and already he has come out with some statements that are so parallel with what I think. I quote:-
"Every year 30 million people are victimised by criminals.
The book is aimed at the general public to help them understand how and why our justice system disrupts and disadvantages them, rather than the CRIMINALS!
It identifies the justice systems preoccupation with the offender.
They are driven by ideology and cost saving and are no longer interested with the protection of the Public.
It highlights the harmful effect of crimes on its victims and the lack of recognition by Parliament, civil servants, and criminal justice practitionersof its corrosive effect on the standard of life and general well-being of millions of people.
Alienation of the public by the police and the jusicial system in general....and the failure to provide justice and retibution for victims.
All spoke of their total failure to get local politicians, MP's, criminal justice officials or indeed anyone to take any notice of their desperate situation."

You can apply all those statements to my case with this conman and all the assholes in the civil service that I have been forced to deal with. It is 10 years since he wrote those words and as the very same situation is still here with us, that shows that nothing changes and never will until the Revolution, as they say.

Intellectual Property Office & Complaints about them. Upgrade

2010-08-08T03:59:00.000-07:00

No I haven't given up and I am still here. Quite a lot has gone on since the last post, but I am not willing at this point to advertise what I am up to, as I do not want to forewarn my enemy. Who is my enemy? Of course number one is the 'Worlds Biggest Liar' then the IPO followed by a few more who for the moment will remain anon.
Even though Liar will think he has won hands down he should not think he is in the clear yet. he may have won round the stupid and corrupt IPO into believing his lies, but there are other ways to pursue JUSTICE and I am a bloke WHO NEVER GIVES UP.
So I have been working away in quite a number of ways and whether I succeed in all of them we will have to see and Liar should not relax just yet.

Intellectual Property Office & Complaints about them

2010-06-15T06:15:00.000-07:00

In my last post I said what has happened to me over the past 19 years is an injustice. Whoever is reading this blog now may not have read all of it and the story from the beginning. So for those I am going to do a breakdown on just what an injustice this has been. One in very brief form, so I will list the ways injustices have been done, starting from May 1992;

1/ The IPO accept the application from Busbridge (RB) to register what is my own trade mark I used from 1986 (and this unknown to me straight away) and in the name of himself and his brother Martin (MB). Yet a few weeks later the partnership breaks up in June 92 and yet RB asks the IPO a few weeks later to do a minor change to the names shown on the application, but still it will show the two names even though the partnership has broken up and no longer exists.

I notify the IPO and ask why they still have the application in the name of a none existent partnership........IGNORED. Their mistake No 1.

2/RB applies to the IPO to oppose Chryslers application to register the same mark (VIPER).

3/ I oppose the same application but even though I have applied AFTER RB, it is my application that is allowed to go ahead and even though the RB opposition IS NOT WITHDRAWN that is allowed to slumber on with no action. Mistake No 2 as RB's opposition should have been the one to be going ahead before mine.

4/ In 1993 RB goes bankrupt.......I notify the IPO and ask why are you now allowing an application to go ahead when not only is there no partnership but the remaining bloke (RB) is now bankrupt......The IPO IGNORE ME AGAIN.......Mistake No 3.

5/ My opposition to Chrysler starts going down the path to an eventual hearing and the IPO puts the application of RB to register, on HOLD until my case finishes!!! Why, because he applied to register before I did, as my slow Patent Agent who thinks that as I can prove I had usage going back to long before RB can ever do so, have precedence. Why did the IPO not let RB's application go ahead instead of putting it on hold????????? Mistake No 4. My own application went in in 1996.

6/I eventually win against Chrsyler after 10 years of time wasting by Chrsyler at great cost to me, and I am GIVEN REGISTRATION STRAIGHT AWAY.......Mistake No 5. (bear in mind that RB has an application to register before me)

7/ I am almost immediately told by the IPO that now they will let RB's held up application to register, go ahead. I am put in the position that I am forced to oppose it.

8/ Around this time RB puts in an application to have my registration made invalid on the grounds that he put in an application before me. I complain that we have now parallel actions and surely they should hear my opposition first as if I win then the other is academic. They agree. Mistake No 6. For now it should have been obvious to the IPO that by their own rules as RB applied before me, on paper he has the strongest claim? Even though his application should never have been allowed in the first place due to his bad faith and having been allowed to continue in the face of the partnership breaking up and being bankrupt. Of course to the IPO, these are of no consequence to them, as they care not a fig for the real law (partnership law for one) Mistakes No 7. ( more mistakes will also be seen to have occured later on as to whether he should have been allowed to keep up his application)

9/ At the opposition to his application to register hearing, despite masses of evidence that I was the legal owner and registered on the evidence of my use back to 1986, ( Do not forget that common law states the first to use a mark is the legal owner of it) the vacuous hearing officer gives RB registration. At this point I have to say that his decisions DID NOT INCLUDE THE OBVIOUS ONE IN THAT HE APPLIED TO REGISTER BEFORE ME.... no he uses a series of incredible other reasons which are laughable. As I am not rich I cannot afford to oppose in the High Court, and have to let it go. Their mistake again in giving registration to a crook who lied over 160 times in his evidence and who they believed ....Mistake No 8.

10/ In that hearing I at least got the IPO to look at a legal point over alleged assignments of the mark by RB and another hearing was held in 2005 when this time a decent uncorrupted hearing officer points out that the application had been made illegally, as the other partner (MB) had not given up his rights to the 50% of the partnership assets etc etc. One to me (so I thought)

11/RB can appeal and does.(2006) He is heard before a ******* barrister called Hobbs and when you look up his history he is a big wheel in IPO circles. It seems that he is revered and can do no wrong. Now if you read the transcript, he breaks all the rules of Judge by giving RB free advice and showing clear bias, and sets RB off on a track whereby he is told he can circumvent the last hearing officers decision. Big mistake No 9. I have reported this corrupt bastard but I will give you good odds, the ruling classes will be banding together to protect the fucker. Mistake No 10. This **** of a judge gives the game away because he makes remarks about me and what he thinks about my action against Chrysler, and I am not even part of this appeal nor has that action got anything to do with this appeal. More on this in the next post.

12/ The crook RB can now go on to apply to rectify the registry records and get his brothers name booted off. Which of course he does. (2008) He wins of course and all my evidence is ignored once more. The more this goes on the more I can see that the IPO have an agenda to not let me win, despite whatever evidence I supply. So of course he wins again. I believe their reasons are biased and corrupt. Mistake No 11.

13/ Of course I now have to appeal (2009) even though I know by now that I will not win. I don't and any good evidence I give of past incorrect actions etc, are ignored. Mistake No 12.

14/ I am at the end of the line now and RB has registration and of course now the IPO can and does let RB reactivate his Invalidity action which he had started way back in 2002. This time I think I must take on a lawyer to make sure that this action is led by someone that can get all the past corrupt actions of both the IPO and RB corrected. His evidence is is correct and is based on the invalidity of the application of RB in the begining way back in 1992. However even though I warn him that I believe the IPO would not let me win, as to do so will open the way for me to sue them for all the corrupt actions they have committed since 1992, he obviously thinks he will win. Of course we lose AGAIN! and ALL our evidence is totally ignored!!! Mistake No 13. (Unlucky for me) The IPO use the IP law which apparently says that the first to apply, even if the application was illegal and corrupted , has precedence. Now I ask why did the hearing officer back in 2004 when I opposed his application to register the mark, use this law???? It stinks to high heaven. Everything that we used as evidence that this action should fail due to perjury and bad faith, breaking of partnership laws etc, is ignored.

So what we have here is a crook that comes along and pinches your designs and products AND trade mark. In other words he pinches your whole business!! The IPO back all his illegal actions and believe absolutely all his hundreds of lies that he tells in absolutely every document he puts in as evidence. Everything you say is ignored and even questioned as to whether it is true. They intimate you are a forger of a document (the agency agreement between you and RB) that you
have been found not guilty of in a court of law. The obvious forgery and perjury of RB is ignored even though you have consistently complained about it, and even though the IPO say they will investigate at this last hearing....and do not do so!! It reeks of corruption, because they are plainly biased and they obvioulsy have this agenda to not let you win in any way. Even when you have legal representation who concurs that I have been shamefully treated and that the actions of the IPO are unbelievable.
This means that the course of getting justice is a joke and brought into disrepute. That a governmental department is prepared to ignore obvious and persistent acts of perjury and forgery and perverting the course of justice. What does that say about the IPO?????
What does that say about all the members of the public who create I/P in copyright, trade marks, design rights, or patents, getting protection from crooks who wish to steal their I/P ?? How can they get protection from a bunch of incompetent bastards who when they know someone is going to sue them for incompetence, do everyhting they can to do them down and stop you from doing that. Tell me what is the point of the IPO??????? They are like EVERY CIVIL SERVICE DEPARTMENT IN THE LAND....UTTERLY USELESS, INCOMPETENT AND ANTI THE PUBLIC WHO WISH TO EXPOSE THEM FOR WHAT THEY REALLY ARE!!!!!

NOW DO NOT FORGET THAT THEIR CORRUPTION IS FURTHER HIGHLIGHTED BY THE FACT THAT MARTIN BUSBRIDGE WHO TURNED UP IN 2009 AND WHO CONFIRMED WHAT I HAD BEEN SAYING ALL ALONG, ABOUT RB BEING MY AGENT, WHICH THE IPO DISBELIEVED, HIS EVIDENCE IS DISMISSED AS THE RAMBLINGS OF A PERSON WHO IS OBVIOUSLY HAS AN AGENDA OF HATE AND ANGER AGAINST HIS BROTHER. ALL HIS EVIDENCE OF HOW HE WAS DONE BY RB OUT OF HIS SHARE OF THEIR BUSINESS IS ALSO IGNORED. ALL THE LEGALITIES ABOUT HOW RB TOOK OVER ILLEGALY THE ASSETS OF THEIR PARTNERSHIP ARE DISMISSED WITH QUESTIONABLE CASE LAW, WHICH MY LAWYER SAYS WAS INCORRECT. IT IS JUST UNBELIEVABLE.

However, I have all my life made a point of keeping up with how governments mistreat the British Public over many different things after at the age of 20 in the RAF Police I experienced my very first example of the British class system and the ruling classes and how they are corrupt ( but that is another story). The media is full of horrendous stories of how awful, people are treated by the ruling classes of this country. LET ME MAKE IT PLAIN I AM NO COMMI EITHER. From how people are treated. When they have suffered at the hands of the useless NHS, at the hands of COUNCILS, the Pensions wankers, the Inland Revenue, Customs and Excise, the various Ombudsmen who are also useless, the Justice system that doesn't work, the police, and so on, ad-finitum. I weep for them all in my frustration and if I ever won the lottery, big enough, I would set up an Institute to fight them all, to expose them and get justice.
We are supposed to live in a democracy, and my 70 years has taught me we simply do not....it is all an illusion as we may as well be living in Russia or North Korea for all the justice many of us do not get. ONLY THE RICH IN THIS COUNTRY GET JUSTICE BECAUSE, THEY HAVE MONEY!!! ( and they don't give a shit about the very people who make them rich....we the working class peasants who slave for them in their businesses for peanuts.Now how is that democratic???

Intellectual Property Office & Complaints about them

2010-06-12T09:06:00.000-07:00

Since my last post I have talked with my lawyer to hear what he now thinks about my appealing
this monstrous latest decision and after he had conferred with a barrister.
Just like appealing against the first monstrous decision made back in 2004 when I lost my opposition against the reptile from registering my trade mark, which I could not afford to take before a High Court, I would have to do the same here to appeal this one. I told my lawyer that I could only do it if it were done on a no win no fee basis.
So he says that he can only do that if a barrister has a look at the facts surrounding this last hearing and decision. He comes back and says he thinks that if the IPO stick rigidly to saying they had to stick to IP law which says that the first applied for registration has precedence over one made after, no matter about the surroundings facts of perjury, and bad faith and the fact that the application was not done lawfully in the first place, then we will lose the appeal. Or at least we could lose, as it would depend of course on some wretched Judge, and we all know how they are in this wretched country.
So the upshot is, like all lawyers who operate on the 'we will win no matter if we win or lose'
syndrome, he will not take the slightest chance and I would have to be willing to fork out maybe £20,000 and the rest. That is out, so the Forces of Evil win AGAIN!!!!! The CROOKS AND CRIMINALS WIN AGAIN AND THE LAW ABIDING LOSE OUT AGAIN. Such is life in this rotten country of ours where only the rich stand a chance of winning, for they can fill the pockets of the fat cat big time lawyers.
However there is one avenue that I can still go down and I am just starting off down that one. But I have no faith in the Brits or any of the government departments you are forced to use and this last avenue will rely on yet another bunch of civil servants. The only maybe, saving grace, is that they have no connection with the corrupt IPO mob. I am hoping that it will not turn out to be yet another case of; 'we civil servants have got to all stick together and cover all our arses'
We will see.
Of course throughout my writing this blog over nearly two years now, I cannot help noticing that if any lawyers have read it, none have come forward to help, probono or whatever. Thus proving to me that they only work on a 'gimmee the money, loads 'o' money mate, or bugger off'
Even though I say it, this story represents a big injustice which ever way you look at it. It is a case of governmental corrution at its highest. When I read of how other poor infortunates who have also had to suffer at the hands of corrupt British justice and law systems and useless civil servants, I have to be glad that many have suffered more than I. For today I have just read of a poor individual who has spent 18 years in jail for a murder he obviously hasn't committed ( and how many have had to do that, I ask?) Put there by yet more incompetent Police and civil servants in the CPS (which is as corrupt and incompetent as the IPO) who withheld vital evidence which showed he was at work when his wife commited suicide. A CPS who lied by saying they did not have files which laid doubt on his guilt, when they did and much earlier than they admitted to. I guess I have to be grateful I at least am not in his unfortunate shoes. I hope he gets out and can sue them for millions....THE BASTARDS, ALL OF THEM!!!!!!!!!!WITH THEIR INFLATED WAGES AND SUPERANUATED PENSIONS AND CORRUPT EXPENSES ETC, ETC.

Intellectual Property Office & Complaints about them

2010-05-17T07:34:00.000-07:00

Well I got this decision at last but only after chasing the bastards. Give you all ONE GUESS AS TO WHICH WAY IT WENT.................You may remember in previous posts and indeed in my last post, I said quite clearly that I doubted it would go my, way because for the IPO to agree with my arguments would be to admit they had been incompetent.
I have to say I make a better clairvoyant than a fighter of incompetent civil servants, because their decision document is an absolute disgrace in every way. It is even more brazenly arrogant, biased against me, deliberately ignoring 75% of my legal arguments AND the legal arguments of my lawyer, than I believed it could be. In fact EVERYTHING that my lawyer put forward in writing and verbally at the hearing, was TOTALLY IGNORED. It is like I never took on a lawyer at all. Every legal point he put forward to show how the IPO had taken wrong decisions and what the law actually said, was IGNORED. They even had the cheek and arrogance to say that they only allowed him to speak in my defence at the hearing.......'as an indulgence' by them. It must be pointed out that he only spoke for me and not for Martin Busbridge, who represented himself.
It was intimated by the hearing officer, one George Salter, that I was forger, that Martin was
consumed with hatred for his brother, that obviously everything he said could not be believed.
Plus a whole lot more which I am not listing here but will in time be shown, by putting a link to this document, in due time.
Unbelievably they did not mention ONCE our complaints as to the persistent perjury that Busbridge was guilty of, and which they said before the hearing they would deal with. These poxy civil servants are so consumed with covering their arses from all the incompetent mistakes they have made since 1992, that they are willing to lie and cover up for a person who is nothing short of a CRIMINAL. However in my opinion they did slip up by ADMITTING THEY ALLOWED ME TO HAVE THE REGISTRATION OF VIPER (my trade mark since 1986) IN 2002 AND IN VIOLATION OF THEIR OWN RULES. Now if they are correct in this and I believe they are not, you have to then take it that since 2002, I have spent 8 years locked in legal battle with Robert Busbridge and the IPO trying to put right the wrongs of the IPO, all for nothing. You have to ask the IPO, if I was not even legally entitled to my own trade mark, then why did they allow me to fight FOUR hearings which took up an enormous amount of my time and cost me at least £10,000? The reptiles even charged me £500 last year to renew my registration that I should not have even had. (according to their latest pronouncement) Not to mention the huge costs I had to pay for this latest hearing when all along they say they MADE A MISTAKE IN ALLOWING ME TO HAVE REGISTRATION. SO THAT MEANS FOLKS, I WAS MADE TO PAY TO DEFEND A REGISTRATION I DID NOT REALLY HAVE......... for they pronounced that my registration now stands as if it had never been made. Get your head round that!!!!!!!!
My laywer is on honeymoon and is not back for another week and when I get to talk with him over all this, I very much doubt he will be at all pleased at the IPO and their crooked antics or the arrogant attitudes they have towards him. You can rest assured I will NOT BE APPEALING TO ONE OF THEIR CROOKED BIASED APPOINTED PERSONS.(who are no more than secret employees of the IPO of the likes of Annand and Hobbs) No it will be through other means to be discussed between me and my lawyer.
As I have said before in this blog, if either the IPO or that little shit Robert Busbridge, think I am giving up on this one, they have a big think coming. It will not be over until the fat lady sings, as they say. There are more ways to skin a cat, as they say.
So the battle continues as I thought it would have to and so keep watching this space. After my meeting with my laywer I will make a new post to announce how I will go forward.

Intellectual Property Office & Complaints about them.

2010-05-04T04:57:00.001-07:00

Since my last post after the hearing of the 28th Jan 2010, we are here three months later and still no decision given. Are the IPO scrabbling around trying to think of how they can squirm out of the predicament they have got themselves into??? I mean they have spent the time since 1992 listening to a serial perjurer lying to them ad nauseum and now his lies have been blown and they have been put into the position that they simply have to do something about the perjury.

However of course to do so means they will be admitting that they are dysfunctional, incompetent and have given succour to a criminal and have walked all over a legitimate owner of a trade mark and have ruined that persons life and health, in doing so. AND WE ALL KNOW HOW MUCH CIVIL SERVANTS JUST HATE TO HAVE TO ADMIT THEY ARE INCOMPETENT. Are they scrabbling around trying to work out just how they can get out of the hole they have dug themselves into, hence they delays? Their own guidelines say that a decision
should come within 4-6 weeks adn here we are at twice that time. My solicitor rang them a month ago asking what was going on, to get the answer that they were just starting to put together their decision, so what were they doing for two months after the hearing?? My guess is that they are having problems working out how to give an honest decision and deal with the serial perjury committed by this criminal who has run rings round them. In the meantime he happily is trading on with his copy of my product and using my trade mark, as if nothing has ever happened and he has committed no crimes. On the subject of crimes I have heard that in 1991/2 he did indeed commit crimes which I am trying to find a way of being able to bring to the attention of 'our simply wonderful Police' ??
I just wonder what their answer is going to be, but if it is another one of their whitewashes, they will have another fight on their hands as I do not intend to let them get away with their 19 years of sheer incompetence to my detriment. I will fight them until my death if necessary as I have never been willing to put up with the ruling classes of this rotten country. They walk all over the ordinary folk, all the time and I am just one of hundreds of thousands who have suffered at their hands. Look at how the bastards treat our armed forces when they have suffered dreadful injuries and that is only one example.
SO KEEP WATCHING THIS SPACE AS WE MAY GET A DECISION SOON AND THEN IT IS ONTO THE AFTERMATH OF THAT, AS IT'S NOT OVER UNTIL I GET REAL JUSTICE!!!

Their own guidelines state that decisions should be forthcoming within 4-6 weeks and here we are at a point of time that is TWICE THAT LENGTH OF TIME. My solicitor even asked them a month ago what was happeneing and was told that the decision making was about to be started and we should get the decision in April. SO WHERE IS IS IT?? JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED AND ALL THAT. However the IPO are not interested in justice and I just wonder where it will all go. If justice is not forthcoming they are going to have a real fight on their hands as I am not going to cave into the bastards. I will die first before I do that, so we will see and if it does not come this month then the fight will start

Intellectual Property Office & Complaints about them. The hearing.

2010-01-30T03:35:00.001-08:00

The hearing was as I expected. A no nonsense, bruiser type bother boy, hearing officer. He was no doubt hand picked by the IPO to make sure that the Busbridge brothers did not come to blows or indulge in endless slagging each other off. And of course to make sure the hearing was conducted to the good of the IPO.
I thought that Robert Busbridge showed his usual colours of a cringing, snivelling liar, trying to belittle his brother and of course me. He told his usual lies of how he was a saint and saviour of the customers of Brightwheel Replicas after it had ceased trading, when of course by my taking on the brothers as my agent after this event, it gave those customers somewhere to go, and they benefitted beacuse this of course gave Cobretti business. He also tried to pin the bankruptcy of BRL on me, when he knew full well that the company had ceased trading due to my partners closing it down AFTER I had resigned. The hypocrosy of this evil man knows no bounds, for he completely ignores his own bankruptcy and the effects on HIS creditors.
Well I hope the IPO ignored all that kind of irrelevant crap. However they have form for not ignoring it and being swayed by his lies.
My lawyer did a very good job of laying out case law regards the partnership and the non legal way it finished, thus making the application by only one partner, for registration, void. He also gave many reasons why the application for the Invalidity of my registration should fail, all based on law. How the two main reasons Busbridge relied on for this application, namely passing off and he having a prior right to me, where all legally wrong. Pointing out that it was he that was guilty of passing off my product and trade mark not the other way round.
I will attach the skelton argument to this blog soon, so you can all see our argument.
Of course now we have to wait for the IPO to issue their decision, but I have absolutely no faith in them whatsoever, as I have constantly said. They have an agenda which is best known only to them. Once that decision is given, of course if it does go against me, I will appeal it. We will know exactly what had been in the IPO minds all along and we will then have their mindset out in the open and will be able to fight it. I got the impression that their minds were already made up prior to the hearing and the hearing was just window dressing. For they have read the written evidence and as they said have read all the previous hearings, so what was said at this hearing was nothing new.
Of course one big thing that the have to address, and we made sure we made comment on that, and that is the question of all the lies and perjury eminating from Robert Busbridge. We made sure we pointed out that the IPO had specifically said they would deal with that at the hearing.
Of course we made sure that his lying and dishonesty and making applications in bad faith, were highlighted. Of course now we had a second witness to all the dishonesty namely Martin.
I personally cannot see how the IPO can find for Robert based on his obvious lying and bad faith, and partnership law and IPO law that was not adherred to. But as I have said over and over again the IPO have shown time and again they have an agenda on this case that is hard to fathom. So we will see.
In the meantime Robert Busbridge will be sweating it out, and if his demeanour at the hearing is anything to go by, which was not so cocky as before, he will be sweating it out.

Intellectual Property Office & Complaints about them. Endgame.

2010-01-27T08:08:00.000-08:00

Tomorrow the 28th Jan will see the long awaited for hearing and all my evidence is in as is Martin Busbridges evidence. Quite frankly having just reviewd the final draft of my solicitors skeleton argument I just cannot see how Robert Busbridge can lie his way out of this one. Also most of it will come across to his dimwitted mind as beyond his comprehension. He may be a fantastic liar who has completely taken in the IPo and the police, but he is still a dimwit who's lack of intelligence cannot stretch to being able to cope with what he faces now. This because my solicitor has been very subtle in how he has put across the liars many acts of perjury over the years. Plus all the facts presented cannot now be disputed as before.
After the hearing I will attach the various statements made by Busbridge for this case, my own statements, those of Martin and finally the skeleton argument. Those of you with a legal mind can then see the gist of my marathon case and what I have been subjected to by the IPO and Busbridge. Those of you who are not in the legal world will also no doubt find them interesting if you have been following this story.

Intellectual Property Office & Complaints about them. Viper History.

2010-01-20T04:36:00.000-08:00

FORTHCOMING HEARING. A DUAL HEARING ON MARTINS APPLICATION TO RECTIFY THE BUSBRIDGE REGISTRATION AND ROBERTS APPLICATION TO MAKE MY REGISTRATION INVALID. 28th January 2010. 9.30. London. The Public can attend so those of you into I/P can come and see how the IPO work their devious ways.

At last we are at a position were both I and Martin MAY get justice at last? Firstly Martin can get to see the fraudulant application to register a Trade Mark that did not legally belong to the Busbridges, and made in his name without his knowledge, get reverted to being listed at the IPO as having been made in the partnerships name and not as Robert Busbridge was able to fraudulantly get changed by perjury to only his name. Then the Landau decision at last enacted and the Registration will not be allowed to be renewed and will fall by the wayside.

If that happens then Roberts cheeky application to have my legal registration made invalid, will automatically be thrown out.

On top of this there is the perjury committed by Robert, not once but dozens of times, in order to gain registration. I as you will know if you have read this blog from the beginning, I have complained about his blatant perjury to the IPO and they said they would deal with this at this hearing.......WE WILL SEE, but as I now have an expert lawyer representing me this time, maybe the IPO will now see that they will not be able to continue with their blatant disregard for justice and for not following the laws and rules. However I cannot help wondering if they even give a stuff, and will just go on blundering ever deeper into their cover up of their past injustices and maladministrations. For if they do find for me and Martin then they will be admitting that they made mistakes in the past. Those of you that understand the mindset of civil servants will know they JUST HATE ADMITTING THEIR MISTAKES AND WILL DO ANYTHING TO GO ON HIDING THEM. So watch this space for maybe a miracle will happen or maybe it will be business as usual?
I will want to see Robert Busbridge charged with PERJURY & PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE and if the IPO refuse to do this, then I will push the Police to do it. I am absolutely determined he is not going to get away with it, especially when he wasted over £100,000 Of Public money, in having me charged with forgery and perjury, this by fraud.

Intellectual Property Office & Complaints about them. Viper History.

2009-11-28T04:11:00.000-08:00

In my post of the 13th Oct I alluded to the appeal hearing back in 2006 that Busbridge had heard in front of this odious man. Now I have disliked the British judiciary ever since 1971 when I first had contact with the wonderful British judicial process, and funnily enough that concerned a QC. Ever since then as I am an avid reader of the press I have been able to see that far from us having this wonderful legal system that politicians and people in the ruling classes would have us believe is the best in the World, I have only contempt for it.
Let us face it ALL Judges almost without exception, belong to the upper classes. They do not live in my World and they are totally out of touch with it. They are a cossetted class who are given time and again to handling cases like buffoons that they are. They are supremely arrogant and nowadays they seem to believe that it should be they who rule this country. They have become
incapable of handing down consistent, sensible sentences to the extent that some seem in need of being sectioned. I could ramble on but will desist as I am sure you get the picture.
Of course barristers belong to the same set as it is they who later on become Judges, so my ire is also directed to that useless section of our wonderful justice system, and this arrogant oaf Hobbs QC is part of that mob. If you read the transcript of this hearing which never issued a conclusion as the liar Busbridge dropped the appeal. Now why did he drop it? Simply because he was given advice by Hobbs and the IPO bloke also in attendance, as to how he could circumvent
the decisions made by the Hearing Officer Landau, who said he was not entitled to the mark and it could not be renewed.
Of course giving advice in a case is 'ILLEGAL', but no matter for these arrogant oafs in ermine, are Kings (and some no doubt Queens) in their legal state. No one is able to say a dicky bird to them, and so they know they can do whatever they like and get away with it.
This explains why during that hearing the illustrious Hobbs felt he could with impunity, say that he thought that my opposition case to Chrysler was 'Sordid'. Now this opposition case had absolutely nothing to do with the appeal hearing he was chairing. So why did he say it? If you read right through the whole 'sordid' transcript it will be obvious as to why he said it. For it is glaringly obvious that he was showing extreme bias towards Busbridge and this was part of that.
Of course for any judge or other judicial person, to show bias is 'ILLEGAL' YET AGAIN HE FEARS NO ONE AND BLUNDERS ON WITH IT.
What would you think on reading all this crap? You I am sure would be hopping mad, in fact 'raging mad' So it is that is how I feel. So I, on not getting anywhere with the TSol, sent in my written complaint to the Office for Judicial Complaints. Let me say straight up, that I have nothing but contempt for ALL THE BODIES THAT HAVE BEEN SET UP TO SUPPOSEDLY DEAL WITH COMPLAINTS MADE BY THE PUBLIC, AGAINST VARIOUS GOVERNMENT BODIES. THEY ARE ALL AN OUTRAGEOUS WASTE OF TIME, ARE MERELY WINDOW DRESSING TO GIVE THE ILLUSION THAT THE WONDERFUL BRITISH POLITICIANS CARE ABOUT HOW WE MERE PEASANTS ARE DEALT WITH BY GOVERNMENT AND ITS ENDLESS BODIES.
Over the years I have complained to various of these useless bodies, and HAVE NEVER HAD ONE FIND FOR ME. I know I am not alone in this for as example the other night on BBC Question Time, a member of the audience said that the Trading Standards people never found for members of the Public. How true he was, for I too have recently been trying to get these useless, hopeless disingenuous turds, to deal with the very same man, none other than Mr Liar Busbridge, who has been advertising on his website claiming that pictures of cars shown and articles written by Which Kit magazine, where of cars he manufactured and made. When all along they were cars I made or from kits I sold. This is illegal, as it is misleading advertising, and
a blatant example of it, and the Trading Standards are the people who should by law be the ones who should deal with it. Of course they refuse to do so. They have used excuses like it is not in the interests of their ratepayers, I am a trader in competition with this trader, they haven't the money to do it, etc etc ad nauseum. All illegal and lies as I am not a trader and haven't been since Jan 2002, yet as I having been in the trade and mixed up with this crook, I am in the know and can state that his claims are lies and have the documentary proof to prove it. I complain because if no one complains about this crook, how is the Public going to know that he is lying to them about his products and his advertising claims? However I digress.
I remember well my MP back in about 2004, telling me that all these Ombsbudsmen are useless and a waste of time, and so it is with the OJC. For after the usual two months wait, I get a letter from some clerk, who I wonder what credentials she had, who threw out my complaint. The reasons she gave showed that she had not even read the transcript, and she completely ignored
a lot of the complaints I had outlined in my letter. THIS IS WHAT ALL THESE USELESS CIVIL SERVANTS DO WITH COMPLAINTS. THEY CHERRY PICK A FEW POINTS YOU MAKE, WHICH THEY FEEL THEY CAN BULLSHIT THEIR WAY AROUND, IGNORE THE IMPORTANT POINTS, FILL THEIR LETTERS WITH HEAPS OF CIVIL SERVICE WAFFLESPEAK, THAT DOES NOT AMOUNT TO A ROW OF BEANS, AND THEN TELL YOU TO BUGGER OFF. (In as many words)
So as they ask for your comments before issuing their final decision, I have sent a blistering letter back. DO YOU REALLY THINK THAT I WILL GET ANYWHERE???? I am taking bets in it. So this arrogant bastard will blithely go on his overpaid way with a smug smile on his fat florid face, and with his stupid bewigged, big head. Of course if you look at where he gets most of his work from..........NONE OTHER THAT THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE. So we can all take it that he is squeaky clean and totally unbiased. The two main complaint that he was biased and insulted my character and dealt with a totally unrelated case, will be all ignored!!!

ANOTHER POINT THAT ANY READERS OF THIS BLOG MAY PONDER ON, IS THAT NO MEMBER OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM HAS EVER MADE ANY COMMENT AND I HAVE SENT A LETTER TO OVER 50 I/P LAWYERS, THE ADDRESS OF THIS BLOG, AND HAVE ASKED IF ANY LAWYER COULD READ IT AS IT WAS IN MY OPINION A HORROR STORY SHOWING UP WHAT THE IPO AND I/P LAWS ARE ALL ABOUT AND HOW THE PUBLIC ARE SUBJECT TO NOT BEING WELL SERVED, ESPECIALLY IF THEY CANNOT AFFORD TO TAKE ON LAWYERS TO FIGHT THEIR CASE. LAWYERS WHO ARE THE MOST OVERPAID IN THE WHOLE SYSTEM, APART FROM MAYBE LIBEL LAWYERS.

Keep watching this blog if your interested in seeing the outcome of the forthcoming hearing re Busbridges attempt to make my Trade Mark registration invalid and my accusations of gross and persistant acts of perjury. His registration having been gained by perjury, fraud and perverting the course of Justice. Not forgetting his brothers accusation that Busbridge also committed perjury at the hearing that dealt with the application to correct the register. Do not forget I went to my local Police about the perjury and the IPO told them that they were best placed to deal with it. SO WE WILL SEE JUST WHAT THEY DO, OR MAYBE JUST WHAT THEY WILL NOT DO!!!

Intellectual Property Office & Complaints about them. Viper History.

2009-11-21T03:38:00.000-08:00

Again it has been some time since I last updated and this is because as we all know all government departments only move at snails pace. Even though I complained months ago about the provable perjury of Busbridge, they have refused to act only saying that they will deal with all that at the Invalidity Hearing which has taken until now for me to even get a date for it.
As I said in my last post I have taken on an I/P lawyer and he contacted the IPO to get them to agree to have a telephone conference to discuss the rolling up of three actions into one hearing. This was then made into two actions, namely the application by Martin to rectify the register again due to his brothers lies made throughout all the hearings. Martin sent the IPO a statement in which he laid out all his complaints as to what had happened throughout the various hearings which started in 2004 with his application to register the T/M. Especially Roberts application to rectify the register to read that he was now the only registered owner of the mark.
So the IPO turned this into an application to rectify made by Martin. Of course even though I am inextricablylinked to all this, I was to be once again kept out of it. So at this conference which took weeks before it happened on the 17th Nov, my lawyer asked that I be allowed to be part of this process and that we wanted the application made by Busbridge to make my registration of my mark, made invalid, to be heard at the same time.
The IPO agreed to this but let us face it, it was no magnaminous decision as they really could not refuse, unless they wished to make it look like they were complete assholes. We were all given until the end of Dec 2009 to get in all our statements and evidence, then a hearing to be heard on the 28th January. So this is now going to be very interesting and I am going to find out just
what the IPO are really all about. Are they going to continue to deny me justice and ignore all my evidence once again, or are they finally going to start applying themselves, for now I HAVE SOMEONE ACTING FOR ME THAT CANNOT BE FOBBED OFF. For it is not only me who is saying that all the statements made by Robert are lies, but his brother is confirming that all I have said was true and it was all lies.
The main lies being that there was a signed agency agreement in 1989, that they were agents, that they stole my trade mark off me as well as my car designs, that I did not abandon my mark to them, that Martin applied for registration in both their names without Martins knowledge, that Robert did try to sell the mark to Chrysler for half a million, thus giving him the reasons for all his actions, and he did that again without his brothers knowledge. That he lied in his statements saying he never knew where his brother was and the last known address of Martin in Spain, given the IPO in a sworn statement, was made up. Plus a multitude of other lies told in every statement he ever made in all the five hearings to date.
So now we have the task of replying to all the statements Robert has made in the two cases and demolishing them. As with all his statements they are full of vacuous waffle that have nothing to do with the cases and they still contain lies as he just cannot help himself from lying as he is a pathological liar.
So for those of you who are really interested in this unbelievable case, especially anyone who is in I/P, keep looking in as the end is hopefully on the horizon.

Intellectual Property Office & Complaints about them. Viper History.

2009-10-13T11:38:00.000-07:00

It has been quite some time since I updated but quite a lot has happened during this time. Things have turned up that will help me to bring the IPO to Justice and to bring one Busbridge to his just deserts. That is of course if the IPO this time do their job, which is always debatable.

Firstly on the question of the TSol and the Hobbs QC bum who showed unbelievable bias towards Busbridge and gave him free advice (not allowed). The TSol to whom I first complained about this arrogant toffee nosed QC ( most of them come from privileged backgrounds as do many barristers....that's why most of them are out of touch, and arrogant idiots) they sat on my complaint for 5/6 weeks and then told me that they were not the ones to complain to. Though of course they sent the Hobbs a copy of my complaint and gave him the opportunity to deny everything. ( why do that if they cannot deal with it?) I had to complain to the Office for Judicial Complaints. The fact that such a department exists to deal only with this subject is an indictment that the Judiciary are not doing their job properly so people are having to complain in big enough numbers to warrant such a department!!!!!!! So off went my complaint to which I got absolutely no response, so many complaining emails later they belatedly acknowledge receipt of my complaint. There it rest for God knows how long.

More importantly about two months ago I got a phone call out of the blue from none other than Martin Busbridge. He being the brother of the hugely nice liar, Robert Busbridge. They split up back in June 1992 because amongst many other reasons, Martin did not want to become embroiled in litigation for the illegal act of pinching all my I/P. (trade mark and designs of the cars) I will not go into all the other info on this split up as its already in this blog. Put simply he was now back in the UK and wished to help me obtain justice over his brother. Hurrah!!!
He could now vouch for many facts that up to now the IPO had ignored when I told them of all the perjury and fraud and forgery that Busbridge had committed. Now it wasn't only just my word (even though I had also supplied evidence).
I found out facts that I had not known about, like Martin never Even knew his brother had even applied to register my Mark, and he had done it in both their names, again without his knowledge and consent.
The fact that Robert had been talking to Chrysler and going for a sale price for the Mark of £500,000. All kept quite.
That the statement on oath that Robert made giving the last known Spanish address of Martin, was totally made up when he knew full well his real address. So even more perjury. It all goes on to much more which I am not going to list at this stage.
What this now means is that the IPO are now going to have to take all this seriously for a change.
I had already complained (see previous recent posts) about perjury made at the 2004 registration opposition hearing by Busbridge. The IPO had said that they could deal with this at the forthcoming Invalidity Hearing, which I was just about to supply my last lot of evidence, especially about the perjury.
Now things have changed completely, because I can now prove much more perjury etc and with Martin as a first hand witness. In the meantime Martin has made a separate complaint to the IPO about his brother and all the perjury and is being given the usual guff and time wasting excuses by the IPO.
So with my official complaint to the IPO CEO, they are now having to deal with things and I eventually got a reply off their CEO which in effect rejected all my complaints (usual for them)
and refused to rescind the registration got by perjury and fraud by Robert in 2004, plus throwing out the invalidity application as that used the same fraudulent evidence as the 2004 hearing. All it came down to was that the IPO would deal with all these allegations at this hearing.
SO WHAT THEY ARE FORCING ME TO DO IS GO AHEAD TO HAVING TO DEFEND MY ALREADY REGISTERED TRADE MARK AND HAVING TO SPEND TIME AND MAYBE MY MONEY TO DO SO.

I was going to do this on my own but it has now got so serious that if I cock this one up and do not forget I am up against the lying devious IPO, so they could stitch me up in my ignorance of my rights and ALL THE RELEVANT LAWS. So it became obvious that I should get some serious legal help here. How to afford it. Here I am lucky in that I have a friend who has known me throughout the last 20 odd years as so knows about what I have been up against. So they have loaned me whatever it takes. Wonderful!!

SO I now have a local I/P expert on the job who has read all the records from day one and has said he cannot understand they way the IPO have been behaving over all of the various cases. He has applied now to have three hearings rolled into one... an application made to have Busbridges registration made invalid/and application to rehear the rectification hearing made by Busbridge/ and the invalidity hearing of my registration. Only one has to fall to make all other hearings fall as they are all linked many with the same perjured evidence. So I now greatly look forward to the forthcoming months and hopefully seeing 'THE WORLDS BIGGEST LIAR'
get his just deserts, for his many acts of perjury, alone is worth a few years inside. But we will see as I have absolutely no confidence in British so called Justice. You could not get a more cynical old bastard as I am. Of course if justice is done there opens yet another bag of worms..........Can you guess what that will be???

Intellectual Property Office & Complaints about them. Viper History.

2009-09-19T07:51:00.000-07:00

What did I tell you about our wonderful police? True to form I had to push them to do anything and at the end of it they tried to worm their way out of acting on the evidence I showed them. I don't know who I despise more...the civil servants or our wonderful police. They of course rang the IPO and they sure as eggs are eggs had a good talk amongst themselves about what a pain this Cook fella is. So the local cops end up saying that they were told by the IPO that they were best placed to do something about handling these charges about perjury and fraud.
Well that remains to be seen as what I am getting from the IPO tells me that it is not a foregone conclusion that they WILL deal with all this in the forthcoming Invalidity Hearing, as the hearing officer will have to decide if it is relevant and shows perjury. My interpretation is that any hearing only will take note of the absolute relevant facts to do with that particular hearing. As this forgery was committed in all the previous hearing which were all about completely different subjects....how is it that they will take on board all my evidence of the fraud and perjury, which was at its most in the 2004 opposition hearing to Busbridge registering my Mark? So we will have to see. However the police did say that if it wasn't dealt with I could go back to them. They obviously were delighted to use whatever the IPO had said to them to give them the excuse to do what all police seem to do these days, when someone asks them to deal with law breakers. It seems to me that it is only when a murder is committed that they actually get off their fat lazy arses. Or when their is a chance for them to play cowboys and shoot someone or play the hard boys at a demo when they can kick someone or push them over etc etc!!

So now it is all hands on deck to get together my last lot of evidence to do with the invalidity application brought on by that bastard Busbridge. Of course I will also have the affidavit of his brother Martin to back me up. However Bob is going to get a surprise at this hearing. IT IS GOING TO BE ABOUT TWO MONTHS BEFORE THIS HEARING TAKES PLACE...MORE
WASTING OF TIME. It is now going on 18 years since this all kicked off, thanks to the slowness of the IPO.

Intellectual Property Office & Complaints about them. Viper History.

2009-09-05T08:26:00.000-07:00

Well they turned out to be just another duplicitious time wasting buch of scumbags, so they can join the rest of their scumbag cousins in in the civil service. THEY KEEP ME WAITING 5 WEEKS AND THEN SEND A WAFFLING LETTER FULL OF EXCUSES, BUT END IT ALL BY SAYING THAT THEY CANNOT IN ANY CASE HANDLE COMPLAINTS AGAINST QC's.
THANKS A HEAP, YOU WANKERS.

Now I have to start all over again outlining the same complaint to another bunch of civil service tossers called the 'Office for judicial Complaints' no doubt yet another one of those useless quangoes that are set up to protect all the of the civil service. Want to take bets on what they will do.....close ranks behind one of their own (Hobbs QC) and he will get off scott free.

Of course the TSol gave this Hobbs character a copy of my complaint so he's had weeks now to cover his arse. His comments beggar belief, he obviously thinks I am just a peasant who simply cannot affect his 'Highness' in any way. Him being a big wig in the so called 'justice' world. He has the effrontery to say,' I considered to be conducive to the attainment of a just and fair outcome to the proceedings then pending before me' The high and mighty tossers think they are so high they cannot never be criticised. The last thing his so called appeal hearing was, was a properly conductive, fair and unbiased hearing. As I have complained, it was nothing but a biased cosy talk where the appeal was not heard but ways were discussed how the applicant (Busbridge) could cheat me out of my Trade Mark.

I am not going to repeat what happened in that appeal hearing as it is commented on in previous posts. The the writer of the letter a P.Barber, whoever he is, goes on to list why my complaint had no merit. All rubbish and arse covering, of course. I will just have to go through the motions again with this next lot.

On the IPO front I am still getting the run round as whenever I ask for points to be cleared upwhoever I am dealing with always acts dumb and I never am given the answer I ask for. Like when I asked why Gittings was trying it on with my complaint of inaction when I gave him documentary evidence that Busbrdige had committed perjury in his statement which was put in as evidence at his registration application and my opposition to that, he then says it is part of the Invalidity action, yet to be heard. This he does because even though that statement has nothing to do with the application of invalidity, Busbridge threw it in to that case, to muddy the waters. So now I have gone back and insisted that the act of perjury had already been carried out in 2004, what are the IPO going to do about it, and to stop making excuses. So far SILENCE.

However things have moved on somewhat further on the other front. By that I mean that my complaint letter to the CEO which has been on hold, has now be widened to include an affidavit from none other than Robert Busbridges brother, Martin. This I told you about in my last post, and now the additional letter of complaint plus a copy of the affidavit has been sent out. It will be interesting to see just what the CEO does about this. But one thing is for sure, I am out to really get this shower, one way or the other. They have bent over backwards for this lying git for 18 years now, and now I have shown just how they have aided and abetted him to get away with PERJURY, FRAUD, FORGERY, PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE, OBTAINING A TRADE MARK THAT HE STOLE FROM ME BY THESE METHODS AND THAT THEY UNSTINTINGLY WENT ALONG WITH ALL OF THE ABOVE AND LET HIM GET AWAY WITH IT ALL, TO MY HUGE LOSSES OF PROFITS, BUSINESS AND HEALTH.
If the CEO does what I think he will do and rubbishes it all, it will just go on in other ways until I get JUSTICE.
Of course I have now given a dossier to my local Police about all the Busbridge perjury and the fact that his lies got the police to instigate an action of perjury and forgery against me, which cost the tax payer some huge amount only for them to lose big time. SO HE COMMITS PERJURY TO HAVE THE POLICE CHARGE ME WITH PERJURY!!!! 'You couldn't make it up' as the Daily Mail writer is always saying about civil servants and the like. I have no faith in the police at all, and I bet you they will try to squirm out of doing everything. I will not let them get away with it, for it is possible to force them to act. SO THE FIGHT IS NOW HOTTING UP.

Intellectual Property Office & Complaints about them. Viper History.

2009-08-30T07:05:00.000-07:00

It has been a month now since I wrote to the TSol re their Hobbs QC and his antics. Still no action even though they have said they received my letter. SO I have had to send another letter
to demand some action due to the fact that I need closure on my actions against Cobretti/Busbridge and the fact that yet another hearing is coming up which is part of the overall story. I don't expect much out of them as no governmental department is going to admit wrong doing.

My complaint to the CEO of the IPO a Mr Fletcher, I told them to hold on until further evidence I had just got in was formulated into a second complaint letter. I mentioned this in my last post and now I am at liberty to divulge what that new evidence is. Those of you who have read this blog from the beginning will know that Robert Busbridge was originally in business with his brother Martin, when I took them on as my agents. That in June 1992 they split up and since then Robert has been saying he never knew where his brother had disappeared to. All I knew was that he was abroad somewhere. A few weeks ago I was rung up out of the blue by Martin who had returned to this country and he said he wanted to help me to get justice and to have his brother get his just rewards. He said he had had no idea what his brother had been up to regarding all the goings on with the IPO over the years, but now he could see via this blog and my other blogs, what had been going on.
Of course I knew that the split up had been acrimonious as Martin had lost his 50% of the business and had lost his house he had put up as collateral on a loan for the business. Also that his marriage had gone down as a result of all the hassle of the business etc. So we arranged a meeting and at this I was able to swop notes as to what had happened after they had decided to steal my business and trade mark off me. Martin freely admitted his part in it and now he said he wanted to make up for it by doing the right thing by me.
I was able to confirm the following;-
1/ They did indeed conspire to pinch my business off me in order to cut me out and make more profit. (I knew that bit, but now it was confirmed for others to see this too)
2/ That Bob had approached Chrysler and unknown to him had posed as the legitimate owner of my T/M Viper in order to sell it them for £500,000, as I had heard.
3/That Bob had unknown to him had put in the applications to register the mark in both their names.
4/ Had engineered the break up in order that he (Bob) would be the sole beneficiary of the business and the £500K he hoped to get off Chrysler. He had told Martins wife that he was having an affair. (Nice one to do on your brother)
5/ Despite Bob telling the IPO that he did not know where his brother was (after the Landau hearing) and then giving the IPO a false address in Spain as being the last known address of Martin. This so the IPO could send Martin a letter asking if he would sign over his half of the business so that would give Bob the right to change the rectify the records. Of course he knew all along where Martin was living in Spain, only 5 K's from their Mothers house, and he had visited him their on a few occasions.
6/ That an agency contract was indeed signed by the two brothers back in 1989 and that they indeed had been my agents thereafter to June 1991 and had bought my Viper kits from me for resale. Something that Bob had always denied.
8/ That the advertising had been as I had described it to Reynolds namely under my control.

He could confirm many facts that I had told the IPO only to be ignored, and what this now means is that the application to register that was heard by Reynolds back in 2004 was solely made on the back of Lies and Perjury, made to Pervert the course of Justice. This makes Reynolds decision making look as sick and vacuous as I have long said it was, for he ignored my evidence and believed the many lies of the arch liar R.Busbridge. How does that make the IPO look, I ask you all.
I asked Martin if the would be willing to back me up by making out an affidavit stating all the true facts of everything which happened up to the time he left, plus the bit about the perjury over his address. He agreed and this has now been done.
So I have now sent the CEO of the IPO a further letter with the affidavit and have demanded action and have said as far as I am concerned, every hearing that was heard by the IPO: The Reynolds hearing for the application to register, the Hobbs hearing for the appeal against Landau,
The Foley hearing for Rectification, The Annand hearing for my appeal against Foley, where all tainted and should be declared null and void and that Police action should be taken for the perjury, committed by R.Busbridge on each of these hearings. I as I have already said have provided evidence of perjury which they obviously wanted to brush under the carpet.

As I know they will not want to take Police action I have gone ahead and taken it myself. I wonder what our wonderful lazy and inactive Police will actually do. However I am determined they will take action and I will take every step I can to make them act. Just as I will against the IPO, for now my hand is strengthened somewhat. So it is all getting much more towards an end game now, but it will be a battle I know. Keep watching this space.

Intellectual Property Office & Complaints about them. Viper History.

2009-07-29T05:54:00.000-07:00

I have now put in my official complaint letters both to the TSol over the hearing in front of Hobbs QC and to the CEO of the IPO whoever that is these days. I have sent copies to my MP, for what that is worth?????

Information has come to light which could blow this case wide open, and I am just waiting for the right time to release that. It will be interesting to see what the IPO then have to say for themselves. Watch this space.
Had I realised back at the Reynolds hearing back in 2004 that if I had used the trial transcript
to show that Busbridge was perjuring himself, I may have been able to get those oafs, the IPO to see that Busbridge's evidence was flawed and not reliable. However this just shows that when people like me who cannot afford to use expensive IP lawyers, we end up not getting justice thanks to the way the IPO runs itself and it's stupid laws and rules.

Intellectual Property Office & Complaints about them. Viper History.

2009-07-23T12:01:00.000-07:00

Since my last post re the IPO, I had emailed them again and got a reply from the boss of the Tribunal section a Mr Allan James to the effect that I had been answered....go away. So I decided to reread the transcript of the appeal Busbridge made to an appointed person, back in 2006, against the Landau decision that he should lose the registration. Something was nagging me about all that was said and it was a pretty long winded document of 40 pages.

The fact that no one since that appeal was dropped and the Landau decision was never thus carried out has rankled me and enraged me. On reading it again it suddenly came to me what was going on here. Why the IPO simply refused to answer me, they were deeply involved in a sham of an appeal hearing. It wasn't an appeal hearing at all, but a cosy get together between the IPO in a MR James, Oh yes, the very same bastard who was refusing to reply to my pertinent question, and it was becoming very clear why.

You see if you read this document and all the waffle in it between James and Hobbs ( who by the way is very heavily involved in the IPO and therefore NOT INDEPENDENT AS HE SHOULD BE) discuss how Busbridge can circumvent the Landau decision by taking certain steps including dropping his appeal. They said that if he did that he would be able to get the registration in his own name and hey presto.
The IPO as you know from my past posts, then spent a year telling me and my MP lies as to why they could not tell me what was happening re this Hobbs decision, when all the time they knew full well, they were present and knew what they had set in train and giving Busbridge time to try and find his brother to try and get him to sign over his half of the business, so he could then go to the IPO and say 'well now I do own all the business, register it' Fait accompli!!
So now I had to complain to the CEO of the IPO and I also as you know have my MP on a warning basis. I have compiled a 5 page letter to the CEO and also a 5 page complaint to the Treasury Solicitor as they run these appointed persons QC's. If I can copy them onto this blog I will do so, so all can see what I have said and get a fuller grasp of the story of how the IPO and the QC have stitched me up.
I have no faith that the CEO will do anything going on past complaints to past CEO's, (they change their CEO's as fast as the rotten politicians change their ministers. So then it will be down to making yet another complaint to the Parliamentary Ombudsman, and we all know how useless they are. My MP has just got to get involved and do some pushing, but how can you have any faith in that useless lot. All they are interested I is filling their pockets. I have never got any help at any time from any of them. Truly the man in the street is treated like shit in this country, only the crooks and immigrants get anywhere.

Intellectual Property Office & Complaints about them. Viper History.

2009-07-23T08:41:00.000-07:00

Since my last post several things have happened. I have set out an official complaint to the CEO of the IPO re the behaviour of their Tribunal/Law Sections. Namely a Mr Roaul Colombo and a Mr Allan James ( the head) If you have read all of my posts you may remember that back in 2005 I won in a hearing held by a Mr Landau when he said that Busbridge should not be allowed to continue with the registration of the trade mark Viper. He appealed that before an Appointed Person a MR Hobbs QC. Held in March 2006.

You will see that I was excluded from that hearing and I had great trouble getting the IPO to tell me what was going on after it had been heard and what was the decision. I could see that something was going on. Both I and my MP were pissed around and lied to by these two characters above. It took a YEAR before I found out that Busbridge had dropped the appeal and had moved onto other ways of getting his wicked way. I did not even know what had been said at this hearing.

Well the first thing you will have seen Busbridge did was to apply to Rectify the Register, that's on an earlier post. I lost that one too, and I then appealed it. Before that appeal on a chance I asked the IPO for transcript to see what had been said in the Hobbs appeal. I couldn't believ it to be sent one and I think some unknowing civil servant sent it by mistake. What I read made my blood boil.

So I had been asking the Tribunal section as to why the Landau decision was never enacted. No matter what I said over many months I just kept getting the run round. Them acting dumb and giving me so called answers that were not answers at all. I knew they were up to no good. So I have just reread this transcript and I can now see the wood for the trees, and it has come to me.

These bastards in the IPO deliberately decided that although there were no compelling legal reasons why any appeal hearing person could overturn Landau, the IPO certainly did not want that to happen, because that would mean I would win at last. Why don't they want me to win???????

Over the years I have been a continual thorn in their sides and they know I am so pissed off that I want to sue the bastards to kingdom come. (if only I could afford it and get some non greedy lawyer to help me on a NWNF basis) I want to show their maladministration and sue them to kingdom come. They will like all unscrupulous civil servants, do anything to stop me getting to that stage.

So they had figured out that if the hearing was a sham which really would only give the appellant

Intellectual Property Office & Complaints about them. Viper History.

2009-07-10T07:58:00.000-07:00

After sending the Head of the Law Section several emails asking him to tell me why the decision of the hearing that took place in 2005 had not been enacted and Busbridge thus being stripped of his registration. This is what should have happened, yet to tell me exactly that would be an admission that the IPO had acted wrongly and can you ever see that happening?
He sent me replies which were just waffle and evasion and it was obvious he did not want to answer the question.
I kept on by pointing out how he was not looking at the facts and what that hearing officer had decreed and why, and that I wanted an answer. He then gave me an answer that was pure civil service disengeniousness and totally untruthful. I replied to that effect and all he could say in a final reply was that he had answered my question, and that was the end of it---'Go away pest', which of course he hadn't.
Now I have sent a letter to my MP and more or less told him I expect him to help me for once instead of acting like he couldn't care less, which is what happened when we met a couple of weeks ago when I asked him about a Judicial Review. Telling me in that disinterested way he has, that I should do it myself, spoke volumes about just how interested he was.
So I wait to see how he responds for he could help me if he wanted to by asking the IPO awkward questions.

Intellectual Property Office & Complaints about them. Viper History.

2009-07-07T12:00:00.000-07:00

In my last post I talked about a Georgina Downs and the problem she was having with another Government department and the six year she has had to endure fighting the lousy bastards over people being poisoned by insecticides. She won at the High Court and as I said the bastard government appealed. Today I heard that bizarrely she has lost that appeal.
I tell you that trying to get Justice against politicians and their lackey civil servants AND THE JUDICIARY is absolutely impossible. The hell with JUSTICE it simply does not exist in their minds. Apparently all the evidence she put forward at her High Court win was not even considered at the appeal and the useless judges hearing it, only would listen to evidence that someone else has come up with. (which no doubt coincided with what the Government wanted to hear) How corrupt is that, and how bizarre, as she rightly pointed out.

It's like I said, people like her and me just cannot win and right now I am having the same old trouble with the Intellectual Property Office refusing to answer my highly embarrassing question that they do not want to answer. Way back in my posts I told of the hearing back in 2005 when a hearing officer called Landau found for me and said that Busbridge should lose the trade mark, as it should not be renewed as of 1999. He appealed that decision but dropped the appeal. In any other world that would mean that the decision would then be enacted. It wasn't, and Busbridge then went on to engage in other means of attack. What he did should have had no bearing on that original decision.
Put it this way, if someone is accused of murder, is found guilty, then appeals, but for reasons known only to them, drops the appeal, do you really think he would be allowed to walk free? No way, he would be sent to prison to serve the original sentence. (More like he would stay in prison as he would never have been allowed out anyway, even to appeal) That is not how the IPO work.
I have sent some emails to their Law Section to ask why it was the decision was not carried out
and all I have had is the Head of that section playing silly buggers with his answers. He is obviously unwilling to answer the questions at all.
I also posed the question as to what their procedures are when perjury is committed by Busbridge in a recent written statement of evidence he made in trying to now get my registration made invalid. I told him that I had the transcript from my criminal case in 2000 when I was accused by Busbridge of perjury and forgery, which I was found not guilty, in which Busbridge admits to several points made by my barrister, and yet in his 2005 sworn statement to the IPO, he tells the opposite, knowing full well he is lying. Would this bloke answer that....would he hell. Prevaricates and pretends he doesn't understand the question. So I continue the battle for TRUTH and JUSTICE.
Next stop if they will not come up with the answers, is my useless MP again, and this time it will be in writing so I cannot get the heavo after 5 minutes is up at a personal meeting, like last time. That letter is going to be VERY blunt.

Intellectual Property Office & Complaints about them. Viper History.

2009-06-28T07:22:00.000-07:00

I have long talked about trying to get a Judicial Review, which anyone can ask for should they think a judicial process has been carried out incorrectly. I certainly think most of what the Intellectual property Office has done has been incorrect and perverse, and as I have reached the end of all of the processes, I could ask for one.
However it is not as simple as that as you need to know the procedure for doing so and the case you put forward for one must be legally correct. One can be a litigant in person, but it is not as easy as you may think. First of all you have to get your request in no more than 3 months after the cessation of the last process, and that is not long enough for the amateur lawyer. Then you have to know how to put it all together in a way that will be legally acceptable AND will cover ALL the legal points you think have been incorrectly dealt with. In such a complicated case as this you really need an I/P lawyer to do all this.
As I have pointed out many times, in this wonderful country of ours justice is only available for the rich. The peasants with little or no money can whistle, because how can a peasant afford fees of £300 per hour to £500 ph? Seeing as the Labour Party since it's been in power, has destroyed legal aid for the peasants it was always supposed to represent, it is impossible to get legal aid for such a legal case. No I/P lawyer will do ANY work on I/P on legal aid, so effectively your stuffed.

I did contemplate doing as a litigant in person, but first of all I thought I would get the advice of one that has gone down that route. Some years ago in Sussex a young woman called Georgina Downs went to Court to get J/R over farmer spraying insecticides next to peoples houses and poisoning them. She had lived next to a field and the farmer had done this to her family with bad effects on all their health. I found a website she had and got in touch with her. I spoke at length with her over how she was able to do it and what had happened .
Basically after that conversation it was obvious that what I would have to go through would be a none starter for me. She was a young person when she started (around 20) and it had gone on for 6 years plus and was still unfinished. Firstly it would take up to a year to even get started, then it could get delayed due to the tactics of the opposition (in this case the IPO)and even if you won they could go for an appeal.
Plus she had had the help of a barrister who she found who worked on reduced fees. She had spent untold time researching the legal side so she herself could do all the legal legwork. So it had taken over most of her life. In my case all this, I decided was too much to pay. Being 68 now, I certainly did not want to have this TAKE OVER all of my life and what may be left of it. Hence why I wanted an I/P barrister to do that.
Knowing the way all civil service departments work, the IPO would make it as difficult as possible and as slow as possible, and they of course have a bottomless pit of money they can draw on. The tax payer of course funds them and you just know that if they lost they definitely would use the taxpayers money to appeal. So it costs them nothing and they do not want ever to be found to be in the wrong. So I decided that I would reluctantly have to let the injustices heaped upon me, go. Even if it sticks in the craw to let them and that lying bastard Busbridge
get away with the outright theft of my I/P and all the rest.
I will instead use the power of the net to highlight the activities of this rat and other ways to get justice of a sort. For instance he has been defrauding the local Council for 17 years by using his private house as a work place for his kit car business and thus defrauding the tax payers of Sutton out of rates. Business rates are much higher than private house rates. Not to mention him saving on rent for an industrial unit instead of using his house and the workshop he has built behind it. (did it have planning permission?)
Plus I will start another blog highlighting his devious business activities. Hopefully this plus the recess will finish the bastard off, business wise, as kit cars are an outright luxury that can be done without. As most who buy kit cars are working class people as rich people would not be seen dead in a kit car as they can afford the real deal.

Another way I am getting back at him is to bill him for persistently using photos of cars I built or cars that were built by others from my kits purchased off me, on his website. Passing them of as examples of his copies of my car. he will have to answer for that in Court as I have billed him £5K for using those images of my cars. This is the cheek of the man and the way he lies to the Public. Give him enough rope and in a few years, if he lasts, he will be telling everyone that he started back in 1985 by designing the car and I will be airbrushed completely out of it. A complete and utter lying twat.

Intellectual Property Office & Complaints about them. Viper History.

2009-06-26T03:44:00.000-07:00

As I said in my last post, this pathological liar has lied his way into achieving his ultimate aim of stripping me, with the aid of those complete wankers at the IPO, of my stolen I/P rights. Busbridge, has now reactivated the Invalidity action to have my Registration declared invalid, which he had started in 2003 prior to the hearing when he applied to register my Mark. It was put on hold until all the actions that have gone on since then, which the IPO have seen fit to believe him on each occasion. Now they are all at an end he has been able to ask for it to be reactivated. The so called evidence he put forward with application was once again laughable. However the IPO like most British civil service and justice departments seem always to believe the criminals and discount anything the victims of the criminals, say. If you read his rambling page by page never ending diatribe of lies and rubbish, non of which were backed up by evidence, you would have to wonder just how any hearing officer of the IPO could believe such obvious trash. But as you have read they did. The hearing officer Reynolds who is well known for being a useless twat in I/P circles, unbelievably declared that I had "abandoned" my trade mark in 1990/1991 to Busbridge. This despite all the evidence I showed that I did no such thing. He chose not to even get his head around the fact that no one who half a brain would abandon a trade mark which they had used for 5 years, putting huge effort into building up, who also had entered into a 10 years battle with a huge multi national company, Chrysler, at high cost, to stop them from pinching the trade mark. Why would anyone having done all that just throw it all away in 1990/1991??????? He poo pooed the evidence I showed of all the orders and invoices between me and Busbridge in 1990/1991 showing me supplying the liar with kits and many parts. So by trashing my rights at that point, I end up not being able to retaliate and appeal because I could not afford up to £50K to do so. (who can except the rich....THIS IS BRITISH JUSTICE AT WORK ONCE MORE) So the other endless hearings were a result and which got me nowhere.
So now I am into the SIXTH hearing when I will once again put forward THE TRUTH, backed up by hard documentary evidence, which will be once gain ignored by the IPO. They of course cannot afford to find for me no matter what I say or show, for they cannot be seen to have made any mistakes in the past hearings. To find now for me will do this. However I will just have to go ahead with this.
What this piece of lying trash is saying is that it was I who stole the trade mark off him and the kits I sold amounted to my "passing off" HIS designs and trade mark. One of his many lies is that he has traded with the mark VIPER since 1987. It is well documented that I did not even take him on until 1988 as my agent and during 1988 to 1991 it was I who manufactured the kits and supplied him as my agent. It is not possible, legally, for anyone to claim when acting as an agent, that the trade mark of the company they act as agents for, can be claimed by them. So it is clear that he was NEVER in a position to use my trade mark until the point when he stole my designs and my trade mark in mid 1991, and even then he was not able to manufacture his copies of my product until late 1991 and even early 1992 as it took him that long to set up suppliers of the chassis and body.
So it will be a long slog to write out my evidence to the contrary of his lying allegations, and one cannot help wondering is it all worth it to eventually have whatever I say and show, to be trashed once again by the corrupt IPO lot.

Intellectual Property Office & Complaints about them. Viper History.

2009-06-23T07:39:00.000-07:00

Firstly a message to the brave Anon who leaves comments but hasn't the guts to state just who he is. Judging by what you have now said it is obvious that you have a connection to Cobretti Engineering. So whatebver you say is biased and you are not in possession of the true and full facts of this case. I HAVE NEVER RIPPED OFF ANYONE IN MY LIFE AND IN THE CASE OF THE CLOSURE OF BRIGHTWHEEL REPLICAS IT WAS I WHO GOT RIPPED OFF BY MY PARTNERS WHO LOST ME THE BUSINESS I HAD BUILT UP AND PUT ALL MY SAVINGS INTO. But then turds like you are not interested in the truth, only your own warped idea of what you think is the truth. For instance you state I slinked off to the Swiss Alps when I did no such thing. I after the closure of BRL I opened Classic Replicas in September 1989 and traded in the UK until June 1991, also using Cobretti as my agents, then when the 1990/1991 recession hit, I went at the invitation of my Swiss agent to build a car there.
So big boy with the big mouth why don't you come out into the open and let me teach you a thing or two about lies and the truth. It will be my pleasure, you snivelling rat!

More later on about what has now happened with the arch liar now applying for making my registration of MY MARK>>>VIPER invalid.

Intellectual Property Office & Complaints about them. Viper History.

2009-05-21T08:36:00.000-07:00

THE IMPLICATIONS TO ALL WITH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, OF THIS CASE.

I believe that what this case shows, and I do not doubt that out there, there probably are many more such unreported cases, that in this country those who have designs, trade marks, copyrights, patents etc, simply cannot rely on the Intellectual Property Office to protect their rights or treat them with competence and honesty.

So you can understand exactly how you could end up like me, having had my I/P stolen from me by a cheating agent, then suffering 17 years of endless hassle via the IPO, losing over £750K of profits, losing my health and having to retire 5 years early with a business worth SWFA, I am going to give you a quick run down on the main points. I am sure many will not have read the full story so this brief rundown will help:-
1/ 1986 I and my son and staff design a kitcar and give it the trade name Viper. Like many small businesses I am too busy and short of cash to immediately register the mark. However I am still covered legally by common law.
2/ In the beginning of 1988 I take on an agent Cobretti Engineering, in London, for the South East.
3/ In late 1989 I have to get rid of two partners so start a new company. I retake on the agent, but this time I will only manufacture the product and make fully built cars, while the agent Cobretti will handle all the retailing of the kits UK wide.
4/ In mid 1991 Cobretti decide to repay all the business I put their way, by copying my designs and also pinching the Trade Mark. They attempt to cheat Chrysler by saying they own the mark but will sell it to them for anything up to £500K.
5/ I find out at this time that Chrysler want to register my trade mark.
6/ I also find out that Cobretti also want to register my trade mark.
7/ I have to cover myself and also register my mark.
8/ I first of all have to oppose Chrysler who had their application in before Cobretti. Cobretti's application is put on hold until my case (I am claiming prior use from 1986)
9/After a snail like 10 year case I win against Chrysler.
10/ Thinking that it was a foregone conclusion that the Cobretti application would be dropped by IPO because I have had use since 1986 and now have registration, was a foolish naive thought for they immediately reinstate their application.
11/ Now I have to fight them. I had paid for legal representation with Chysler but cannot stretch to this, this time so am forced to do the case myself.
12/ An application hearing is set for mid 2004 and I will be opposing. It is very apparent that the miserable hearing officer Reynolds doesn't like hearings where the applicants and opposers represent themselves. I lose and am given perverse reasons for losing.
13/ The reason given was that in the infinite wisdom of Reynolds I was deemed in 1990 when I retook on Cobretti as an agent that I had abandoned my mark. I was incredulous as the reason given was that this was because I had not advertised my product and used my Trade Mark in doing so. I had allowed Cobretti as retailer to do this thus they had "taken" over my mark. What a load of cobblers and crap!! I can think of many manufacturers who have agents who retail and advertise their products, yet have never heard of a single case where one has thus lost thier T/M. Think of Ford or Vauxhall etc. I did have evidence of my advertising my mark and I had made five fully built cars for customers in the period 1990/1991. What were they called???
I also had all the orders and invoices to and from Cobretti and the mark was shown on some of those. All ignored by the ignoramus Reynolds
15/ As any appeal would have to be done through the High Court at great cost (at least £50K)
obviously I had to let it all go. BRITISH JUSTICE IPO STYLE!!!
16/ 2005. A hearing was ordered by the IPO to look into alleged assignments which I had queried the validity of, this at the application hearing by Reynolds. Another hearing officer Landau (probably the only honest H/O in the IPO) found that Busbridge had no legal right to the mark. This because when he and his brother split up their partnership in 1992, Robert did not buy out his brothers share, so he had no rights to register the mark and it was declared null and void. He also referred to his bankruptcy.
17/ Busbridge appealed over the assignments, but he was allowed to appeal to an independent QC rather than as under the 38 Act to the High Court. This service is FREE. He drops his appeal after getting loads of free advice from this QC on how he can stitch me up.
18/ By any rights you would think that the original Landau decision would now be enacted. Not on your life!!!!!!! Not when the IPO are concerned.
19/ Cobretti/Busbridge now put into motion the advice. Apply to have the records of the original registration application to be changed to ONLY HIS NAME and dropping the name of his brother. So Hey Presto he is now the legal owner of the Mark, even though I too have it registered. So what is the point of having a T/M when the IPO allow two people to have same Mark for identical products. All my evidence for this application to be denied is ignored by H/O Foley. I can appeal.
20/ At the appeal again all my evidence is ignored and I lose again thanks to the corrupt ways of the IPO who as far as I am concerned had decided way back because I had complained bitterly for their actions or non actions. Someone had decided I was to pay for being cheeky enough to make waves for civil servants. I was doomed to lose as they knew I had no clout or money to get expert legal help to really show them up.

Does any other this remind readers of other similar cases over past years and not even in I/P cases. The British Public are constantly being stitched up and trodden all over by corrupt and vindictive civil servants in all manner of cases. It is a well known fact that trying to get JUSTICE from the corrupt ways of our ruling classes is all but impossible for the average man on the street. Only the rich and famous in our wonderful country get justice....because they have the MONEY!!!!!!

Intellectual Property Office & Complaints about them. Viper History.

2009-05-20T07:44:00.000-07:00

Not having logged on since my last post in March, I was surprised that someone had actually left a comment. The one and only one since I started this blog. However my surprise was quickly dented when I read it. I was instantly and once again reminded that this country now contains many nasty shitty people, and the younger they are, the shittier they are. I bet this one is under 30!! It read "you are a sad act to follow" and left by someone with no guts at all to identify himself/herself by signing as Anon!!
I could go into a very long ramble, lasting all afternoon about what a shitty country I now live in with a lot of shitty people, etc. I will just say this. "I sincerely hope, if you have any brains, that at sometime you will invent something, design something or whatever. That someone comes along and steals what you have worked on and brought into being, and just getting going with. You lose all you worked for and put your money into, losing over $750K, your mind gets totally fucked up, you have a breakdown and then a heart attack. Ending up a gibbering wreck, fit only for the nut house. It will serve you right for being a nasty, unkindly person, with no compassion or understanding of other people being robbed blind of their Intellectual Property rights.

Enough of that and to what the decision was. I looked at what I had written in my last post, and I should be a mind reader or a medium. For it was as I said.....an IPO whitewash held by one of their minions. It backs up my contention that all governmental employees and politicians are steeped in corruption and their complete inability to dispense Justice. It doesn't just happen with events to do with the IPO, as it happens to the "good" people of the UK, all the time. For example I read a couple of days ago the heart rending story of a couple who's son died of a hereditary disease they did not know he had. When he started to go rapidly downhill with his health, despite seeing about 5 different doctors non was able to diagnose the problem and even though the symptoms obviously showed that something serious was going on, all refused to send him to hospital. That is until they kicked up a big fuss and by then he was so far gone that he died quite quickly.
All they wanted was for the Doctors to release all the records, which of course they wanted to keep secret. The records were even tampered with to hide the events that happened. So began a 20 year bid to get the result they were entitled to. Let down by Doctors, the medical establishment, the government, the Justice system, in fact everyone. Now 20 years later they still have no result, yet they know their son was killed by doctors incompetence and apathy.

This is just one of many horror stories I have heard of over the years and I feel my story now in its 17th year, is similar. In this country as a mere member of the Public, you are viewed by t]our ruling elite, as no more than nuisance peasants who should shut up, put up with whatever they who rule you, dish out. NEVER ever complain as we will make sure you never get anywhere. We certainly are NEVER GOING TO ADMIT WE EVER MADE MISTAKES!!! You will never win so go away you pest. Unfortunately for them I am just not going to do that.

Now who was this woman Annand, who heard this appeal. Well she wasn't Asian and with a name like that who knows her back ground. However on researching her I see that at least since 2001 and up to 2006, she heard no leas than around FIFTY ODD CASES FOR THE IPO, as a hearing officer. Now she is allowed by the IPO and the Treasury Solicitor. My first thought is that the Treasuries job is to see that they spend as little money as possible. Finding for me opens the door to me suing the IPO and we cannot have that, can we?
Then we have a person who has worked for the IPO for years and one has to ask where are her
loyalties? She may even still be paid for by the IPO for all I know. I am sure the UK Public are well aware of all the gross cases where government departments judge themselves. The list includes Politicians, Dentists, Doctors, Police, solicitors etc, to name a few. Then we have all these supposedly independent OMBUDSMEN. What a joke they are, independent my backside. My
MP of a few years ago who was old enough to be in the know, told me to never waste my time going them as they were all a waste of time. How right he was. So the person who heard this appeal did not fill me with any hope whatsoever and within minutes of the appeal starting, her words spelled out what the outcome was going to be.

The hearing Officer Foley, who heard the application to rectify the register and to change the details that the IPO have of both Martin Busbridge and Robert Busbridge as being the registered owners of the Mark Viper, to that of only Robert Busbridge. You may ask, "well so what, does it matter who is registered as the owner" I say it is important, because at a previous hearing Hearing Officer Landau said clearly that Robert was just not legally able, to even apply for the registration as he had never bought out his brothers 50% of the business and its assets. He said that the registration of the mark had to be annulled. Now several devious avenues down the line, the IPO have manipulated things to now put all that on its head, and to now arrive at a situation where they have manipulated everything to Busbridges advantage, and they have found excuses to say that he was perfectly and legally able to steal his brothers half of the business. I had hoped that this Annand person would be looking at what Landau had said, and asking why it was never carried out. Obviously she never had the guts to do that, for her job was to make sure the devious ways the IPO had concocted to allow Busbridge to keep his registration, carried on uninterrupted. So I hope you can see why I tried to stick in my oar and stop the registration ever being in only Roberts name.

To recap the decision of Foley in a nutshell I lay out his reasons:-
1/ He said that by Robert giving his brother an indemnity for future debts etc, this gave RB a right to MB's half of the business. This even though no such legal indemnity was ever sighted, and it was said that it was reasonable to assume it was given. Evidence here, goes out of the door, as the IPo don't do evidence.
2/ RB was therefore entitled as registered owner to apply for the registration which was up for extension in 1999, to be extended.
3/ Adverts showed RB carried on business on his own from 1992 when the partnership broke up and right to present time. Completely ignoring the facts that from 1993 t0 1996 he was a bankrupt and not legally able to trade, that from 1996 to 2000 the companies that were used to trade with the name Viper, were not owned by him but his wife.
4/ There were no laws re bankruptcy which said that his asset of a trade mark application had to go to the Official Receivers. This even though I had several letters from various high up managers including the IPO & CEO, that said had the IPO known he was bankrupt they would have contacted the O.R over the application.

I put in my statement which held all my replies, to everything Foley had brought up in summing up his decision. I put in this document 14 pages and 21 paragraphs which all scrupulously dealt with only what Foley had spoken about. I showed the inconsistencies and the mistakes he made. I kept to only what Foley had dealt with and said.
After having put in this statement, I realised that one of the main planks of his reason to allow
RB to alter the registry, was over the business of his bankruptcy and the letter he had got from the Insolvency Service in 2007, which said they were not interested in the asset of the trade mark. Yet when I had asked them many times for information they had always told me they were unable to answer any questions as to what they believed or did in 1992, could not be answered as all the files had been destroyed due to age. Yet here they were, able to categorically say they were never interested in it. How did they know this with no files to look at? Yet here is Foley using this to say RB thus owned it.
I decided that I had to ask to be allowed to put in extra evidence and to ask the I.S questions and to get them to clear up why they sent this letter. I had only been given 28 days to get in my statement of appeal. I knew the I.S would take months to reply. I compiled another statement and argument, showing the replies I had got from the I.S and I believe they showed that this letter could not be relied on as credible evidence. I sent it in.

Professor Annands summing up and decision document is only 11 pages long and most of that is taken up with typical IPO waffle. Going over and repeating the story that we all know already:-
Page 1 deals with the Act that says an application for rectification can be made.
Page 2 ditto
Page 3 ditto then how RB applied and what he said.
Page 4 ditto
Page 5 what the registrar said in a letter to RB and his reply. How the IPO sent a letter to Martin Busbridge even though they did not know where he lived and just posted it to his supposed last address. How the registrar wrote to me.
Page 6 general comments on that letter and how I applied for an appeal. My application to apply to put in further evidence.
Page 7 At last a reference to the actual appeal hearing but only to what she thought of my extra evidence which was to trash it as it in her opinion had no effect on the appeal, even though it concerned one of the three planks of the reasons for the decision of Foley. That's the way the IPO work. She even states that Martin had no part in RB's bankruptcy. So what! as it was RB that was doing all the applications to keep the Trade Mark and it was Foley that brought up this for one of the reasons for his decision.
Page 8 She states my reason that I thought the H>O was wrong to allow the application because there was no evidence that Martin gave up his part of the business. Hurrah she actually agrees that I was right about my complaint the Foley had strayed into the other hearings instead of keeping to what he was only supposed to be dealing with. She then reverts to repeating what Foley had stated in his summing up
Page 9 ditto, She states my criticising Foley for making constant references to what Hobbs QC said in his hearing where he pontificates on law.
Page 10 ditto and Annand simply agrees that whatever Hobbs said, that was OK and that Foley referred to what he said was also OK. (One has to remember here that Hobbs was supposed to be dealing with an appeal against what Landau had decided. Which he ignored and instead pontificated on his vast knowledge and gave Busbridge endless free advice on how to stitch me up. All perfectly OK by IPO standards. To me it smacks of Hobbs is a big wheel in Intellectual Property and Annand is sucking up to him..... Fuck me, what do I matter. She then says I criticised the fact that there was no evidence for the alleged indemnity. Then she says that even that being so. that's OK according to according to same case law, which she does not elucidate us with.
Page 11 More waffle re what the Registrar has to look at when in 2007 RB applies for rectification. She says there was evidence that RB had continued to trade ( completely ignoring my evidence and statements about this alleged trading being all mostly smoke and mirrors and lies) How a letter was sent to a supposed address of Martin in Spain, etc. Then her CONCLUSION that my appeal is dismissed.

90% of all her document is waffle and going over what we already know as it is on the record.
My two statements to her re my appeal plus the accompanying documentary evidence to back up a lot of what I said, are all ignored. This even though 100% of what I talked about and dealt with, was all in reply to what Hearing Officer Foley had written in his summing up and decision.
Not to mention what evidence Busbridge had put into the original application and my statement and documentary evidence in reply to all that. Was all that bullshit to be ignored, because it was the basis on which the application case was based on.
Quite frankly it all smacks of a rush job where the outcome had been preordained, for the IPO know they can say anything and they know that, what the hell can I do about it. They probably guess that at the end of the day, what can I do about anything as they know I am penniless, to all intents and purposes.
Further on this line, I was surprised that during the short 3/4 hour so called hearing, Annand did not ask either myself or Busbridge any searching questions. I mean, I posed many questions as the the reasons Foley used, and to the evidence of Busbridge which he relied on. She should have cleared up my queries. So it all smacked of not a hearing to go into the questions as to the rightness of Foleys statements and really amounted to no more than a retrial of the application heard by Foley. She had her agenda and what went on at the Foley hearing was of no consequence. If she had said that the Foley hearing was flawed and his approach was all wrong
and she was going to start from scratch, that would have been more honest. However doing that would have meant I would then have wanted to put a fresh opposition statement in and I would have wanted Busbridge to do likewise.
One thing that Annand did say on page 6, para 12 shows me how her mind was working. She puts in what I think is a snide remark as to why did the Registrar send me a letter telling me of the "update". This was telling me that Busbridge was putting in for a rectification and. She remarks in words that are implicating that this appliaction was nothing to do with me as wasn't a party to those proceedings.. So why should the IPO be letting me know? She even says that my opposition to Busbridges original application to register the mark in 2004 had been decided in his favour and I had not appealed. She is implying that I should therefore mind my own business
Well Madam, I had a big interest in what went on over Busbridges registration for I too have registration for the EXACT SAME MARK, and I had that on the basis of usage going further back than Busbridge. The IPO knew that I would be opposing anything he did to solidify his position, and that was my right to do so. I should NEVER have been in an ex parte situation where I could not openly see what was going on. The law says ANYONE can oppose his rectification application and as I say, I had good reason to do so. But it shows that her mind was made up on this whole story and it also shows her biased attitude towards me.
Little people like her in governmental positions annoy the hell out of me. None of them have ever run a business or a welkstall. They have no understanding of the "real World" the world of business and what i have been up against. I bet her attitude would be vastly different if she had had a business and had designed something, which was then stolen from her thus giving her the aggro I have had for 17 years.

However even poor people can if they try hard enough, get JUSTICE. It all depends on your tenacity. Plus today we have the power of the web.
At the end of the day this exercise was only held because before I can even apply for a Judicial Review of the whole sorry saga from day one, I have to show that I pursued it to the very end. It matters not to me whether the Trade Mark Viper is registered to Martin, Robert Busbridge or Mickey Mouse. What matters is that it was allowed to be registered to anyone else at all, when I by all laws, and MORALLY, had the rights to it going back to 1986. Full Stop!!!!!! It should never have been allowed to go ahead to a bankrupt, then after I had got registration, by proving use prior to the start of use by Busbridge, it should never, on the evidence heard before Reynolds, have been given to Busbridge. What Reynolds said in his decision was a travesty of justice, and it was compounded by the fact that under archaic rules of the 1938 Act, I would have to be a rich bastard to be able to afford to appeal it. In fact had I been rich I would never have lost that hearing in the first place., and that bastard Reynolds made it perfectly plain that he hated having to hear a hearing made by two non legal people. I guess he hated me the most, judging by his remarks, so made sure I lost. BRITISH JUSTICE.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Intellectual Property Office & Complaints about them. Viper History.

2009-03-24T04:53:00.000-07:00

Of course it was a foregone conclusion that I would mount an appeal against the perverse decision by Hearing Officer Foley, last year. The reasoning he used to allow the rectification of the Trade Mark Registry to amend their records and show that R>Busbridge owned the Trade Mark Viper, was flawed in a number of areas.
Firstly saying that a bankrupt person need not lose an application made to register a T/M is perverse, especially when you have their own CEO saying they would. Secondly saying that in a partnership that breaks up, the partner that continues with the business would automatically be said to have legitimately taken over the other partners 50% share of the assets, merely by giving a indemnity against any future problems, even though no such legal document exists to prove that took place, is also perverse. So here we go again in this 17 year fiasco of incompetence and snail like progress that you can only get with British civil servants, thus forcing me into another legal fight.
This time it will be an appeal by me in front of what they call "An appointed person" who is supposed to be independent, but who in reality, really is a servant (indirectly) of the Intellectual Property Office (IPO) I have a 6th April date in front of a Professor of Law at a university, who takes such appeals. I do not have much faith that they will be truly independent. QC Hobbs who heard the appeal by Busbridge in 2007 turns out to be a big wheel with the IPO and used by them all the time, and this showed in this case when I got the transcripts of that hearing. It was just a biased hearing which turned out to be no more than a "free advice session" to advise Busbridge on how to stuff me up and get round his legal problems and the decsions that went against him. In my case this person happens to be a woman and by the sounds of it may be Asian. (if Annand is an Asian name??) So we shall see, but I am not holding my breath.
To get a Judicial Review you have to exhaust all avenues to get your justice, and after this appeal I will have done that. So then it will be a matter of trying to find a lawyer who will take my case on, as in this wonderful country of ours where only the criminals and immigrants get unlimited free legal aid, white indigenous Brits like me who are not criminals, can go fuck ourselves. Only the rich get justice as they can afford it. On top of this lawyers these days are only interested in heaps of dosh and people being able to access to justice, is a foreign field to them. Will I be able to find an enlightened lawyer.........place your bets now!!