Sunday, 2 June 2019

Corrupt Government Legal Department PT 5.

FURTHER UPDATE  2/6/19.

I sent in my complaint meant for the Parliamentary Ombudsman via Tobias Ellwood MP on the 21st April. As you will have seen, he slowed it by insisting I fill in a form which I did and he notified me on the 4th May he'd sent it in to the Ombudsman.

Almost a MONTH later the Ombudsman has just sent me a letter confirming they have received it and it's now in the extreme time wasting machinery of a government department. Disappeared as you may say "into a huge black hole". I am informed "A case worker will now decide wheter we should carry out an investigation. ...there will be an extended wait....as we are working on a higher number of cases" Notice that they avoid like the plague saying they are complaints about government departments including the NHS (there will be untold thousands of NHS complaints clogging up the Ombudsman). This is what we ALWAYS HAVE TO PUT UP WITH ! Hence why it can take years going nowhere, being lied to and pushed onto other departments, who go through the same long winded avoidence tactics. Then at some stage you will be told your complaint is  "OUT IF TIME!"
Yes; because they have deliberately fucked you well and truly over to make you out of time ....then they can tell you to bugger off and out of their hair !

You can bet, either they will say they cannot investigate this shyster GLD Mob for some spurious lying reason, OR they will invent a whole load of lying excuses and alleged reasons why they cannot investigate either the case and what went on, or the GLD as they are 'Protected' in some way. They give that game away by going on to tell me "We also have to check if we can investigate in line with our 'legal powers'............GO ON HAVE A GUESS WHICH IT WILL BE. AND ALL THIS IS ONLY A COMPLAINT THAT THE GLD LIED WHOLESALE TO ME (AND WITH PROOF THEY DID) and THEY REFUSED TO ANSWER A NUMBER OF LEGIT QUESTIONS.

WHAT A SHOWER WE HAVE TO PUT UP WITH AND THAT IS NOW READILY SEEN IN THE RULING CLASSES ACTIONS OVER THE PAST 3 YEARS OVER BREXIT.

IF that eventuates its back to Ellwood to try and get him to do his duty to a constituent and one who is a VET who he says he specialises in representing, in some way. 

Saturday, 6 April 2019

Corrupt Government Legal Department Pt4

UPDATE-28/4/19. I SENT IN ALL THE LETTERS AND DOCUMENTS AS SEEN BELOW, TO ELLWOOD MP ON THE 10TH APRIL AND HE TOOK 3 WEEKS TO GET BACK TO ME AND THAT WAS ONLY BECAUSE I SENT HIM AN EMAIL ASKING WHY I HAD NOT RECEIVED AN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FROM HIM THAT HE HAD RECEIVED IT ALL AND HAD SENT IT ON TO THE OMBUDSMAN. THIS IS WHAT YOU HAVE TO PUT UP WITH.
However he told me that as I had not included a Form that the Ombudsman insist you fill in to send with the complaint (More stifling bureaucracy as you end up supplying the same info as included in you complaint letter) and so he could not send it in. I have now filled it in its gone off to him.
HOWEVER THE TELLING THING HERE IS THAT I HAD ASKED HIM TO READ MY COMPLAINT SO HE COULD SEE WHAT I WAS UP AGAINST, NOT ONLY BECAUSE THE GLD HAD LIED TO ME BUT THE OVERALL SITUATION IS THAT THE JUSTICE ESTABLISHMENT WERE TRYING TO BRUSH ALL THIS UNDER THE CARPET AND HOW COULD HE HELP ME AS MY MP. PLUS HE BOASTS THAT HE SPECIALISES IN HELPING VETS WHICH I AM. IT IS TELLING THAT HE IGNORED ALL OF THAT AND JUST TOLD ME TO LET THE OMBUDSMAN DEAL WITH THE COMPLAINT.
IN OTHER WORDS HE WAS NOT INTERESTED IN HELPING AT ALL AND I AM GOING TO GET BACK TO HIM AND INSIST HE DOES.


So for the latest in this shocking saga of a rampant corrupt Justice department that astonishingly gives out legal advice to our useless government, yet it is itself, corrupt !! AND THIS IS WHY AT THE MOMENT, OUR  USELESS MRS MAY IS BEING FED CRAP LEGAL ADVICE AND SO IS BEING SHAT ON BY THE EU....SO MUCH FOR THE GLD !! I had sent the CEO of this utter shower, a Formal Complaint about how is department was lying to me. I sent him copies of the emails I'd sent in asking various questions and getting no answers and being lied to when they told me that they never supplied Appointed Persons to the IPO.

I EVEN SENT HIM A COPY OF THE EMAIL THE IPO SENT ME A WEEK AGO THAT CONFIRMED THAT THEY, WHEN THEY WANTED AN APPOINTED PERSON TO OFFICIATE IN AN APPEAL HEARING ........IT WENT TO THE GOVERNMENT LEGAL DEPARTMENT !!!!!!!!

But no, these utter assholes are so arrogant and so cocksure that they can do whatever the hell they like.....AND GET AWAY WITH IT !!!!!! They tell the most outright and clear LIES AND WHO THE HELL IS GOING TO BE ABLE TO STOP THEM??????

I asked him reasonable questions about Appointed Persons and who supplied them, if they say they don't and more importantly WHO PAYS them. Is the IPO lying?? Well I sent him several documents which showed beyond doubt, that the GLD or Treasury Solicitors as they are also called, supplied them, I included documents that showed that when I MYSELF ASKED THAT AN APPEAL HEARING OF MINE BE HELD BEFORE AN APPOINTED PERSON, SHE WAS SUPPLIED BY....YES....THE T/SOL !!!.

The asshole CEO called Jonathon Jones,, so smug is he, that he told me as if I did not know, that if I were dissatisfied with his short letter and bunch of lies to my 3 page letter....well I could take it to the Parliamentary Ombudsman. YES THE SAME CORRUPT BUNCH WHO RECENTLY COVERED UP FOR THE MINISTRY OF JUSTICE OVER THE SAME TOPIC WHEN THEY OBFUSCATED AND LIED. SO HE KNOWS THEY WILL ALSO COVER UP FOR HIM AND ALL I WILL GET IS ANOTHER BUCKET FULL OF LIES ETC FROM THEM.

WATCH THIS SPACE TO SEE THAT ALL HAPPENS, AS MY COMPLAINT ABOUT THE GLD HAS NOW GONE IN AND WHILE I WAS AT IT, AS IT HAS TO GO TO THEM VIA YOUR MP,
I ASKED HIM (ELLWOOD) TO READ IT ALL AND TELL ME HOW HE COULD ACT AND HELP ME OVER THIS MONSTROUS EXAMPLE OF OUR CORRUPT JUSTICE SYSTEM.
AS HE BOASTS HE IS THE DEFENCE MINISTRY SPECIALIST FOR VETERANS......I POINTED OUT THAT I WAS A VETERAN OF 8YEARS IN THE RAF AND HAD BEEN ON ACTIVE SERVICE TWICE IN CYPRUS AND ADEN. (UNLIKE HIS CLEAN 5 YEARS) SO WHAT WAS HE GOING TO DO TO HELP A FELLOW VET????? PLACE YOUR BETS, FOR THIS MAN IS ONLY INTERESTED IN CLIMBING THE GREASY POLE AND ALL HE THINKS ABOUT NOW IS BECOMING OUR NEXT USELESS PM !!!!

WHEN I GET TIME, I WILL POST ONTO THIS POST THE LETTERS AND DOCUMENTS I SENT THE CEO OF THE GLD PLUS MY LETTER TO THE PARLIAMENTARY OMBUDSMAN
ASKING THEM TO INVESTIGATE WHAT THE GLD HAVE DONE.

PLACE YOUR BETS NOW THAT ALL I WILL GET IS LIES,OBFUSCATIONS, EXCUSES AND WORST OF ALL EXCUSES AS TO HOW THEY CANNOT INVESTIGATE.

FIRSTLY I SHOW THE LETTER I SENT THE OMBUDSMAN :-

 
The Parliamentary Ombudsman,
Millbank Tower,
Millbank,
London.

9/4/19.

Dear Sirs,

FORMAL COMPLAINT RE THE GOVERNMENT LEGAL DEPARTMENT.

Background.

In 2007 a Barrister, one Hobbs QC acted as an Appointed Person on behalf of an Appellant who was appealing a decision the Intellectual Property Office had made against him. Although the subject matter was about my registered Trade Mark, I was refused attendance. I subsequently found that Hobbs had at the alleged hearing, committed several unlawful acts that perverted the course of justice and against me.

The alleged hearing was NEVER an appeal hearing, but a meeting where Hobbs gave the Appellant
legal advice which if he acted out would circumvent the decision which went against him. This was unlawful on several counts. I have a criminal Barristers opinion that this was the case. Over the past years I have tried to obtain justice over this and to cut a long story short, last year I arrived in my fight to the point where knowing that the Barrister who had been supplied to the IPO by the Treasury Solicitors, now known as the Government Legal Department, to the IPO, who I believed were an arm of the Ministry of Justice as it said they were at thaT time of around 2008/9.

I accordingly asked the MoJ to investigate the unlawful actions of Hobbs who was not independent and working through a Barristers Chambers, but was an employee of the T.Sol. THIS WAS NOT A CASE OF A JUDICIAL HEARING HELD IN A QUASI JUDICIAL TRIBUNAL HEARING, NO DECISION HAD BEEN MADE AS HOBBS ADVISED THE APPELLANT TO DROP THE APPEAL. So making excuses that decisions made in judicial hearing cannot be overturned etc will not wash. Or that Barristers are independent is another excuse that does not apply here. FOR WHAT THIS BARRISTER CARRIED OUT AT WHAT WAS ONLY A MEETING WHERE ADVICE WAS UNLAWFULLY DISHED OUT, WAS CRIMINAL AND HE SHOULD FACE THE CONSEQUENCES AND AS HE IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE GLD (T/SOL) THEY HAVE A DUTY TO INVESTIGATE AND CARRY OUT ACTIONS AGAINST HOBBS FOR HIS CRIMINALITY. BARRISTERS ARE NOT ABOVE THE LAW EVEN IF THEY WERE ACTING AS AN INDEPENDENT FORCE. EVEN JUDGES ARE NOT ABOVE THE LAW.

Of course the Judicial Establishment simply do not want to admit to any of this, even though it runs a coach & horses through our very rule of law etc. How can it be said we live in a country under the rule of law when this can happen within it? IT HAS BECOME A FACT that at every turn, everyone I have approached including the MoJ and the GLD, simply will not address my request for JUSTICE.
The MoJ have lied by saying they had no ‘JURISDICTION’ over this….as you well know as you handled my complaint about this and sided with the, (predictably), BUT THEY GIVE THEIR GAME AWAY BY REFUSING TO EXPLAIN WHY AND YOUR REFUSAL TO GET THEM TO DO THIS MAKES YOU AS BAD AS THEM. Well of course it is blindingly obvious they simply DO NOT WANT THIS EVER TO COME OUT. SO IT HAS TO BE BRUSHED UNDER THE CARPET WITH YOUR HELP.
And there is form for this covering up by our so called Justice departments, for the Moj are under investigation by the police over illegal acts…..as they covered up research about cuts to legal aid.
(Which as it happens, means I am where I am as I’ve been made penniless and have no access to Legal Aid.)

I obviously, after the MoJ lies and refusal to give out answers, have gone to the GLD and this is what I am reporting to you. For they have resorted to the same old lies, obfuscations and denials.
I am enclosing copies of my letters to them and their lies they sent back and how they cynically lied again:-

Document 1. My letter of the 11th March 2019 asking them why they have not responded after a MONTH to my letter of the 12th February 2019 ,when I asked them to investigate Hobbs and including with my letter copies of 16 documents that prove my case. What I laid out in my 12/2/19 letter is not part of this complaint as it’s not your job the investigate unlawful matters as in this case scenario, but to make sure that the body it was sent to, acts properly and does not lie and cover up anything!

Document 2. Is their short reply of the 12th March by a Kiernan Walker, denying that Hobbs ever was an employee despite my evidence he was and not offering any explanation as to why he wasn’t and why they can say he wasn’t, when they supplied him to act as an Appointed Person to the IPO. The writer also denies the GLD supplies AP’s to the IPO, which is a blatant LIE. They also fed me misleading alleged information trying to show they were helping me, which they were told I’d already approached them years ago.

Document 3. Is my email reply to Walker you can see that I am asking a list of questions and making observations.

Document 4. Is a reply from the GLD from a Mr Stephen Brown who is Walkers boss, but he does not answer anything I asked and merely gives out excuses and NO ANSWERS.

Document 5. Is my reply email to Mr Brown asking specific questions.

Document 6. Is Mr Browns reply: Note he fails to answer anything and makes the LIE that the GLD do not supply to the IPO Appointed Persons.

Document 7. is a copy of the email sent me by the IPO who confirm that the above is a LIE

Document 8. is my reply to the above and pointing out the truth of A/P’s as supplied by the GLD and asking specific questions.
*** This you should note was not replied to. Now this is a typical civil service cop out tactic when you got them into a corner and they know to reply TRUTHFULLY will give their game away. So they ignore that letter and that just shows what they are up to.

Document 9. I now have had enough of their lies and obfuscations and send in my Formal Complaint letter to their CEO a Jonathon Jones with enough copies of documents that show up the lies etc. Note it is 3 pages long with 11 copies of the documents to show him what has been going on.

Document 10. His very short reply which is an insult to me and the gravity of what I am exposing.
He also head it as a “Formal Complaint about Hobbs QC”, when I was now in the process of complaining formally about the lies etc of his employees. This is what I have to put up with.

None of my pertinent questions have been answered by any of the three people involved, let alone acknowledging the documents I sent in and what they proved and I have been fed misleading information an lies and given not one jot of of bona-fide help in how this can and will be handled. Now either these people including the CEO are fools and dunces or more likely they are indulging in typical civil service skulduggery of lies and misinformation, misleading comments and so on, hoping you will be thick enough to be fooled by it all and will give up & go away…….NO CHANCE.

So it is again over to you, but are you going to indulge in the same tactics….THAT IS THE BIG QUESTION. However it is clear that the way they have behaved and treated me is so far below the standards I should expect from our Justice System, let alone the very department that is supposed to give legal advice to our government and its departments.. NO WONDER OUR COUNTRY IS BROKEN AND DYSFUNCTIONAL AND HAS BEEN FOR ENDLESS DECADES AND AGAIN CAN BE SEEN IN THE BREXIT SHENANIGANS AND LIES.

I look forward to receiving your excuses and lies as you did with my complaint about the MoJ.

Regards,

Ken Cook,

Bournemouth,


DOC 1.  - MY LETTER COMPLAINING RE NO REPLY TO MY ORIGINAL FORMAL COMPLAINT LETTER WHICH CAN BE SEEN IN THE LIST OF DOCUMENTS ON OPPOSITE SIDE OF BLOG PAGE.

The Government Legal Department, 1, Kemble St, London' WC2B 4TS.
11/3/2019.
Dear Sirs,

FORMAL COMPLAINT RE YOUR IGNORING MY COMPLAINT SENT YOU ON THE 12TH FEBRUARY 2019.

I sent you via Registered Mail a comprehensive 8 page complaint, re the unlawful actions of a Barrister, one Hobbs QC, together with copies of 16 documents (including a 47 page transcript of a meeting he officiated in, which was a bogus Appeal Hearing and which his actions he carried out, which perverted the course of justice). This was received by one of your employees who signed as `Mack'
Despite your website stating that such complaints would be dealt with within 10 working days or would at least give a reason for any delay in a response, to this date which is now about ONE MONTH ON, I HAVE BEEN IGNORED. THIS IS SIMPLY OUTRAGEOUS and one I have over
the years come to expect of our rotten so called justice system and from its civil servants within.

I  made a point of asking you to return said documents along with your reply.

I now wish to complain about all this and receive a response. As no one department of yours was initially concerned, obviously my complaint was not directed to a specific department. Never the less you have no right to do nothing.

I now look forward to a response and by return seeing as I have now lost a month in time.

Yours faithfully,
K.Cook

DOC 2.

Government Legal Department
Companies,  Land Registry and Property Team One Kemble Street London WC2B 4TS

Dear Sir

RE:  FORMAL COMPLAINT AGAINST MR HOBBS QC

I  refer to your letter dated  10  February 2019 and  I  apologise for the delay in  replying.
I  have noted the enclosures,  the originals of which are being  returned to you with this letter as you  requested.

I  note that you  have sought to use GLD's complaints  procedure to complain about a decision  made by Mr Hobbs QC in his capacity as Appointed  Person for the purposes of an appeal from the Intellectual  Property Office (IPO).

To be clear,  as Mr Hobbs QC is not an  employee or a `client' of GLD our complaints procedure has  no application  in this instance.   GLD has  no role in  how Appeals to the Appointed  Person are conducted or the actions  of the  Intellectual  Property Office generally. GLD's  role  in  relation to the  lPO  is  limited to  providing administrative assistance.

An Appointed  Person  is appointed to that role  by the Judicial Appointments Commission.     Any issues arising out of the conduct of an Appointed  Person should  be raised with the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office.

I  hope that this  letter clarifies the position.
Kiernan Walker
for the Treasury Solicitor.

DOC 3. MY REPLY TO KIERNAN

To:kieman.walker@governmentlegal.gov.uk

Dear Sir,

Re your short reply letter to my complaint letter and evidence documents  You have engaged in yet another whitewash exercise to brush this under the carpet and I fully expected the to happen, as it has happened at every level of complaints l've made to various justice system departments that are supposed to deal with such complaints. The capacity of the British Justice System has for lying, obfuscating and doing everything to hide its misdemeanours is astonishing and that from a system supposed to be sqeaky clean and to dispense honest justice, is astonishing and a national disgrace. You all seem to think that all we peasants out there are as thick as two short planks, so cannot see what you people are up to.

You state 'I note you complain about a decision made by Hobbe QC'. Now, either you never read my letter or looked at the evidence documents and their contents, or you are deliberately lying. For I NEVER COMPLAINED ABOUT ANY DECISION AS THERE WAS NO DECISION .. .I COMPLAINED ABOUT THE  UNLAWFUL BEHAVIOUR OFF HOBBS.

I INCLUDED AN OPINION DOCUMENT BY AN INDEPENDENT BARRISTER, which you either never read and have ignored, as it is inconvient for you.

You try to have it that Hobbs was not an employee of the GLD.  He may not be now,  but he was then an employee of the Treasury Solicitors and please do "not try it on that now some bright spark has wasted taxpayers money renaming the T/Sol, you have no jurisdiction over what the T/Sol did",   I won't buy that and you have also ignored the fact that on your wesite the GLD clearly states that lawyers etc (and a barrister is a lawyer) are employees.  I am sure the work Hobbs did for the T/Sol in any capacfty, he got paid for this and by the T/Sol, for who else would pay him his wags/fees ?? That in any ones world (except your world of cheats and liars) this would mean he was an EMPLOYEE. He was not then working through a Chambers.

You would have it that Hobbs is not an employee of the GLD. (This is said in the present tense) So what is he NOW, is irrelevant, because it is what he was in 2007 when he worked for the T/Sol. It thus follows that as an employee of the T/Sol they (now the OLD) are responsible for any unlawful acts he carried out in their employment.

Straight after I got and saw the transcript  I complained to the T/Sol  They like you, lied about everything I alleged and would have it that the actions of Hobb were sqeaky clean and above reproach and he could do what he wanted.  Funny how a criminal Barrister specialist sees it otherwise but then you are not interested in that as it is inconvenient for you in your efforts to protect one of your own and cover it up  Even I as a layman, know that he should have been 100% independent and certainly should not have indulged in heaps of advice giving to the crook trying to steal my IP.  It is telling that they did  not use the same lies as you now use. I was fobbed off and told to go to other judicial complaints bodies, just as you are doing.

However the GLD does still supply to the IPO (they have confirmed they still apply to yourselves for A/P's, with barristers and others, acting in appeals for the IPO. Again this just shows that these people you dish out to the IPO are not given out for FREE, and they must be renumerated by yourselves, thus as I've said they are EMPLOYEES as you state on your website...or is that a lie too?? Your saying you only give .Administrative Assistance- to the IPO, is yet another lie, as any A/P you put forward can hardly be described 'assistance'. IT IS A `SERVICE', like you supply to OTHER GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS AND BODIES AND THEY CAN HARDLY BE FOR FREE! Your department has to balance its books like any other.

Then you try again fob me off by saying an Appointed Person is appointed by the JAC, yet their website only deals with JUDGES. But so what, even they do 'Appoint Barristers' to be Appointed Persons' it is obvious that they are not actually EMPLOYING them!! Similarly the next fob off you try on,  namely the JCIO, as they only deal with complaints about JUDGES and Hobbs was not acting as a JUDGE in that Instance. He should just have been running an Appeal Hearing but an Appeal Hearing was never heard and it was only a MEETING of the appellant + the IPO (who should not even have been there and Hobbs there as an alleged AP, all dressed up as a bone-fide Appeal Hearing, but was nothing more than a bogus hearing.

Lastly, just what position do you hold as this seems to be a secret ( YOU COULD BE ONLY THE TEABOY) This is a serious matter that I am determined WILL NOT REST.  I wish it to be now dealt with by your Boss one Emma Robinson. I see from your letter heading that your department is called Companies, Land Registry and Property Team. Just how does such a department be ABLE TO DEAL WITH SUCH SERIOUS MATTERS AS ONE OF GLD's EMPLOYEE ACTING UNLAWFULLY AND CRIMINALLY AND PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE. THIS NEEDS TO BE DEALT WITH BY AN 'APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENT TO DO WITH CRIMINAL MATTERS'.

P.S You couldn't even comply with your own replying standards and get a reply sent to me within your time limits.

K.Cook.

DOC 4. THEIR REPLY.

On Monday,18 March 2019,13:34:15 GMT Stephen Brown
.
Dear Mr Cook
I refer to your e-mail of the 16 March 2019, addressed to Mr Walker.  I am replying as Mr Walkers line manager and the leader of the GLD team in which Mr Walker is employed.
The nature of your original letter is unusual and as has been noted, your complaint is regarding the conduct of an Appeal by Mr Hobbs QC between 2004 and 2007.   I reiterate what Mr Walker said in his earlier correspondence, ie  that a barrister sitting as an Appointed Person is not employed by this office in any capacity.    How the Appeal is conducted, whether by hearing or other determination, is a matter for the Appointed Person.
Although it is not clear, you appear despite this explanation to believe that Mr Hobbs QC is or was an
employee of GLD. He is not, and never was.
You papers have been returned and Mr Walker has set out the route that you would need to follow if you wish to make a complaint regarding the conduct of the Appeal to the Appointed Person.  This office is not in a position to assist you further or make any other comment on the issues that you have raised.
Stephen Brown, Team Leader, Team A5, General Private Law Litigation
Litigation Division, Government Legal Department

DOC 5 - MY REPLY TO BROWN. 

Sent: 18 March 201914:02 To: Stephen Brown Subject: Re: Z19/KJW/A5
Thank you for your reply.

Even though you appear to wish to obfuscate about this,  I am asking you to be more open as to the EXACT situation re A/P's. You are not making clear why it is that you supply A/P's to the lP0 and you do.  Is it too much for you to explain this apparent anonomoly? Are you being disingenous when you say Hobbs was never an employee of the GLD, I because he NOW does not work tr you. Also as you obviously supply Barristers as AIP's how come they are not employees of the OLD? Vvho pays them? Or do you do this service for free and they also never get paid when the sit in as A/P's.   Hobbs who clearly came from the T/Sol at that time, how is it he was not employed (if that is what you are saying) by the T/Sol either?
I could if you are going to be awkward, ask you again thro' a FOIAct request.
You do not seem to see, that failing to be open and helpful you open yourself to one becoming very suspiscous.  Seeing as the justice system has form for covering things up, Finally please explain why my request is unusual and what do you mean when you say it has been noted? I mean that sounds rather ominous likerdo you put it in a file of your, of members of the Public who are a nuisance or whatever?
So I would appreciate an answer that is more informative and helpful .... PLEASE.
 

Regards,
K.Cook 


DOC 6 - THE REPLY FROM BROWN.

RE: Z19/KJW/A5

From:   Stephen Brown (Stephen.Brown@governmentlegal.gov.uk)
To:        sailerboy63@yahoo.co.uk
Date:    Monday,18 March 2019,14:29 GMT

Dear Mr Cook
l'm sorry if the earlier emails did not make the position clear.
To be absolutely clear:
1.    GLD do not, as you suggest, supply appointed persons to the lPO;
2.    GLD does employ some barristers as part of its work force. However, Mr Hobbs QC has never been employed by GLD. Just because Mr Hobbs is a barrister, it does not follow that he was ever employed by GLD.
3.    Should you wish to make a complaint about Mr Hobbs, the appropriate body is the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office.

Stephen Brown, Team Leader, Team A5, General Private Law Litigation
Litigation Division, Government Legal Department

DOC 7. THE IPO CONFIRMS THIS.

RE: Appointed Persons
From:   Information Centre (lpo) (lnformation@ipo.gov.uk)
To:        sailerboy63@yahoo.co.uk
Date:    Wednesday, 20 March 2019,15:38 GMT

 Dear sir/madam
Thank you for your reply.

Apologies for the delay in answering your query,  I have spoken with a colleague in the hearings section and can confirm that we appoint members from the Government Legal  Department for appeals at the Intellectual Property Office (lPO).
I hope this helps with your enquiry, if you require any further information,  please do not hesitate to contact us, you may get an automated reply with any further queries as confirmation your emails have been received.
Yours sincerely

Mahdi Hussaini
Information Centre Advisor

IPO,
Concept House, I Cardiff Road, Newport, South Wales.  NP10 8QQ
ww.ipo.gov.uk

DOC 8. - MY REPLY - ASKING QUESTIONS AND NOT REPLIED TO....THIS IS USUAL AND SHOWS THEY ARE IN A CORNER.

From:   ken cook (sailerboy63@yahoo.co.uk)
To:        Stephen.Brown@governmentlegal.gov.uk
Date:    Monday,18  March 2019,16:01  GMT

Thanks for your further reply.
However what you have said does not match up with the history that I have. You see I have in my records a letter from the Head of the lPO Tribunal Sect dated 177/2009 and Mr James told me that A/P's are appointed by the MOJ. Which trley may have (but I doubt it as he was  an arch liar) but in the hearing in 2006 Hobbs officiated at (the bogus hearing)  he was put forward to do this by the 'Treasury Solidtors' (now GLD) Then later on in my saga I had to also appeal before an A/P and that person was supplied by the T/Sol !!!!! and I have letters to prove that. After that I myself had to appeal a dodgy decsion by the IPO and I have an email from the IPO telling me if I wanted to put in further evidence I should send it to the A/P at the T/Sol  !!!
On top of all that when I saw the criminal actions of Hobbs in the transcript I complained first to the lpo and predictably got nowhere and they directed me to the T/Sol complaints proceures, which I did in 2009 and again all I got was a pack of lies etc.  I have all the letters to do with that.  Recently I asked the lpo who they now got A/P's from and they emailed me that it was to you-the GLD!!!
Now maybe Mr Brown, you can see why I am somewhat confused by your remarks and the history of obfuscations and outright lies over the whole history since that Hobbs meeting/Appeal (Bogus) means  I TRUST NO ONE in the British Justice System. All I see again and again is lies and denials and efforts to pass the buck and deny everything.
So maybe you would like in some small way to correct that sordid history and EXPLAIN T0 ME IN DETAIL JUST WHO SUPPLIES AP'S TO THE IPO NOW AND WHO THOSE A/P'S ARE PAID/EMPLOYED BY WHO ?? Especially as 10 years ago the T/Sol did-now you-and I see that you still call yourselves the Treasury Solicitors.
Also is Hobbs still supplied, by whoever, as an A/P maybe you will still deny all knowledge of him, but maybe you will know who he works for now, if not for the GLD (You obviously know who he is as he is the top IP Barrister and Judge in the UK)

Regards,
K.Cook

DOC 9 - MY LETTER RAISING A FORMAL COMPLAINT TO THE GLD CEO.


 Jonathon Jones, CEO Government L egal Department, 1, Kemble St, London, WC2B 4TS.

25/3/19.

Dear Mr Jones,

FORMAL COMPLAINT THAT MY REQUESTS FOR ANSWERS ARE BEING FOBBED OFF BY A STEPHEN BROWN OF YOUR GENERAL LAW LITIGATION DPT AND BEING LIED TO WHOLESALE .

I am having to send you this complaint and that is if you ever actually get to read it and it's not high-jacked by one of your minions whose specific job is to waylay such letters as this from you  ! ! !---because one of your departments is treating me in the exact same way that all civil servants these days seem to think they can treat we peasants in the country, with utter contempt. Presumably because you all think you can easily get away with it. An done because you all think we are thick and will not see it and will not have the ability to sort you all out.

I sincerely hope you read all this and DO NOT PASS IT DOWN T0 SOME SIMILAR MINION OF YOURS, TO AS THEY ALWAYS DO_TRASH IT WITH MORE OBFUSCATIONS AND LIES, JUST T0 BRUSH IT UNDER THE CARPET AS A COVER UP!!

I sent into the GLD a dossier of documents to show that one of your employees, a Barrister called Hobbs, committed criminal acts at an alleged Tribunal Appeal Hearing, at which he officiated as an Appointed Person, supplied by yourselves under the guise of the Treasury Solicitors. (2006) Those acts perverted the course of justice, which ruined my life and for which I have for some time now, been trying to get justice over. Long after the prescribed time limits set for you sending replies, I eventually got the predictable whitewash reply, which even in that, there were just lies made. That document can be seen in my attached documents I am including to prove what I say. It is annotated as DOCUMENT `A'

Walker said that Hobbs was not an employee of the GLD. Now he offers predictably no explanation as to why and exactly it was that the T/Sol provided his services to the Appellant/IPO. Then he says that your complaints procedure was not applicable because of this, but again makes no explanation as to exactly why it isn'L As it is irrefutable that the T/Sol supplied this man and if he was never an employee, anyone with any manners would explain why he wasn't and explain EXACTLY what he was and why the T/Sol were and still are, the vehicle to supply Appointed Persons (A/P's) yet seemingly no one employees these mysterious persons, who seem to work for no one or are paid no wages and if they work for wages who pays them? And who pays them are then,- their employers I ! ! I wasn't in business for 50+ years to know nowt ! !

I have some 30 plus years of trying to deal with civil servants, so I know only too well what they get up to and lying to get out of answering for their incompetence and corrupt actions, together with even actions that break the law is appallingly par for the course ! !  Lying is what goes on in order to brush it all under the carpet and I know I am dead right, as only two days ago I read in a national newspaper an article by a still serving civil servant, who exposed what civil servants get up to and
how they treat the public with utter contempt etc,etc.Well as I've said I have had first hand experience of all that and this is just the latest episode. hand
DOCUMENT 1. This is my reply to that fob off and needs no further explanations.
DOCUMENT 2. I then got a reply from a Stephen Brown, where he carries on the obfuscations you people are experts at. If ALL civil servants in this country were as good at running their departments and the country as they are at lying etc, this country would not be the basket case it is, which we all know it is, thanks to the Walkers et al, of the civil service.
DOCUMENT 3. Is my reply and perfectly reasonable request for explanations.
DOCUMENT 4. His reply which shows he is now exasperated, but he doesn't give me the explanations I asked for. How rude is that and no question I posed is EVER answered?  AND he blatantly lies when he says the GLD does not supply AIP's to the IPO (See doc 7 which PROVES he is a liar)
DOCUMENT 5. I now sent him another email which true to form he ignores-hence this F/C to you. This because; are you aware that people under you are behaving like this?? Maybe you do and it's with your blessing and directions to do so ??
DOCUMENT 6. This shows how the department you are responsible for, indulges in blatant lying. DOCUMENT 7. This proves you are LIARS.
DOCUMENT 8. Shows that in 2009 the T/Sol were an arm of the MOJ (at least from my recollection of what in 2009 they said on their website about being so and from what James told me) DOCUMENT 9. Shows how I was told to go TO THE T/SOL, re me wishing to appeal another later and dodgy IPO decision ! !
DOCUMENT 10. Shows me going to the T/Sol to complain about Hobbs. DOCUMENT 11. This AGAIN shows the implications of the T/Sol in A/P's, re appeals.
DOCUMENTS 8/9/10/ AND 11 ALL RELATE TO WHAT I SAID IN DOC 5.

So you see Mr Jones, the evidence I show, proves the lies I have been fed from from your lot. All this concerns the criminal actions of a person, put forward by yourselves who you deny that being so, but without a shred of evidence, that Hobbs was not employed by you or the T/SOL. No doubt one of your excuses will be, that it is not a matter for the T/Sol/GLD re what employees or others used by you, get up to, even if they are criminal and unlawful. Given who the GLD are, I would have thought that is just one more big lie. For you are the very department that is responsible as you boast on your website, that you have a "core purpose to help the government to govern well and within the rule of law."

Yet apparently you are simply not interested when someone closely working for yourselves acts unlawfully and that leads to committing criminal offences by perverting the course of Justice !! (AND this that I allege, is backed up by the opinion of a very experienced crininal Barrister, not involved with governlnent.  AIL you and your workers can do is try to fob me off with obfuscations and outright Hes ......... HOW DISGUSTING IS THAT.' ???

Even if you could show how this Hobbs bloke and all the other AP's are not employed by yourselves etc, you should at least when matters like this are brought to your attention, is act upon this and see judicial actions are started against the person concerned after a thorough INVESTIGATION and seeing the EVIDENCE. Or telling me how I can get JUSTICE without me having to pay to do that. And not give me a load of guff that means in real life, isn't worth a light and are roads I went down years ago, to only receive the same old fob offs and lies. It is simply the old boy network at work AGAIN, in that all you Establishment Justice Johnnies, all stick together to protect each other and KEEP THE RUDDY BAYING PEASANTS AT BAY
If I had the money I would have taken this bastard to the High Court in 2007, but having had my business ruined by him and other civil servants, they knew I had no money to do that. You had better pray I don't win the lottery ! ! Because criminal acts have no time limit. My Father was a Colonial Police Inspector on CID for 15 years, his Father and brother both in the UK Police and I was in the RAF Police. So I'm not that ignorant on the law and being a Marine and Auto engineer since the RAF, with my own businesses since 1965,  I am no fool either and VERY meticulous. So you should chew on all that and the only way you are going to get rid of me is to send a hit squad around to bump me off . Because up to now I am in very good health and this will go on until I DIE ! !  !
I LOOK FORWARD TO SEEING WHAT LIES AND EXCUSES YOU COME UP WITH AND I IF YOU DO NOTHING, I CAN FEEL IN MY WATER, A DEDICATED BLOG COMING UP --DEDICATED TO THE THE CORRUPT WAYS OF THE GLD ETC. AS IT IS, ALL THE CORRESPONDENCE ANI) FACTS ARE APPEARING AS WE GO ALONG, ON MY GENERAI, BLOG ON CORRUPT CIVIL SERVANTS.


Yours Truly,
Ken Cook,


DOC 10. - THE SHORT REPLY FROM A FELLOW QC TO HOBBS-SO NO WONDER WHY HE WILL NOT DO A THING AGAINST 'ONE OF THE LADS' !! JUDGING BY HIS LETTER HEADING, HE WILL BE FULL OF HIMSELF. !!


Jonathan Jones QC (Hon)
Pemanent Secretary 
HM  Procurator General & Treasury SolicitorOne Kemble Street London   WC284TS
thetreasurysolicitor@governmentlegal.gov.uk
1  April 2019
Formal Complaint about Mr Hobbs QC

I  am writing  in  response to your letter dated 25 March 2019.    I  note that you wish to complain about Mr Hobbs QC.

You appear to believe that Mr Hobbs QC is or was an employee of GLD,  or that GLD are  or were  responsible  for  `supplying'  Appointed  Persons  to  the  IPO.    As  both  Mr Walker and Mr Brown have explained to you, this is not correct.   There is therefore no basis for your complaint against GLD.

If you remain unhappy about the handling of your complaint, you may wish to consider an approach to the Pariiamentary Commissioner for Administration (the Ombudsman) who  investigates  complaints   made   by  members  of  the   public  about  government departments  and  other  public  bodies.     To  do  this,   you  will   need  to  make  your complaint in writing to an  MP who can refer it to the Ombudsman,  with your consent, with a request that an investigation be conducted.

JONATHAN JONES

******For those of you who are Eagle Eyed, you may notice that JJ deliberately ignored and/or refused to reply to the following questions I asked him:- ******

1. No apology for all the excuses and lies put out by his employees/staff.

2. No explanations to the questions I asked re: Why Hobbs was/is, not an employee of the
    GLD/T/Sol?

3. Why does the GLD offer A/P's to the IPO if they are not employees of the GLD?

3.  Who actually does employ A/P's and pay them?

4. Why did he ignore all 11 documents I sent in to back all that I was saying/alleging,
    let alone answering or even denying what I was saying/showing?

5. Why was it that he did not out of respect and curtesy, tell me what law department would deal
    with the actions of Hobbs QC, given that his employees fed me eroneous info on this ?

BY ACTING THE WAY HE DID AS THE CEO OF ONE OF THE UK'S MOST IMPORTANAT LAW DEPARTMENTS, HE SURELY DID NOT COVER HIMSELF IN GLORY OR SHOW THAT THE GLD IS A TOP RUN DEPARTMENT THAT TREATS ANY MEMEBER OF THE UK PUBLIC WITH RESPECT.







 




 







  








 

Monday, 1 April 2019

Corrupt Government Legal Department Pt 3

In my last post I told you that I had sent into this shower a comprehensive Formal Complaint against Hobbs QC. With documentary evidence to back up my allegations. This was quite a hefty set of documents as I included copy of the 47 page transcript of his corrupt meeting when he carried out all his unlawful actions.

They are supposed to deal with such requests within 20 days and true to form it took well over that for me to get their excuses and whitewash letter dated the 12th March. This was a one page letter with 5 very short paragraphs/sentences. In short like their letter, they merely denied they ever employed Hobbs or for that matter that they had ever sent him to the shonky IPO hearing. They even had the cheek to lie that they even supplied what are called Appointed Persons to hear Appeals on behalf of IPO Appellants.

Of course I have a letter from the IPO that puts that lie to rest because they confirmed that they get their A/P's off the GLD. What liars these civil servants all are.

So obviously I have now sent in a complaint about all this to the CEO of the GLD and Mr J.Jones
and that is where I am now at. No doubt it will either be ignored or whitewashed again

I would put onto this blog on the right all of the letter together with all the supporting documents that went with it. However it is all far too long and in any case a lot of it is already to be seen on this blog. IE the Transcript is on, plus the Barristers opinion document  and they say it all or most of it all. I will in due time show the reject letter and any response I finally get, if any.

I have also sent yet another letter to the Sunday Times (already asked their Editor to stand up to his claim they investigate such stuff, but the bastard never even acknowledged let alone contacted me for the full details and evidence. Thus proving that our National big newspapers are all part of our Establishment cover up machinery, because they simply will not expose our corrupt justice system with all its corrupt and useless Judges and lawyers like Hobbs.

Sunday, 10 March 2019

Corrupt MoJ & Gov Legal Dpt Continued

In my last and latest posts you will have read how my efforts to get justice from firstly the MoJ then through my complaining to the Parliamentary Ombudsman, when the MoJ failed to deal with my request and getting the usual unmitigated lies and obfuscations and typical twisting of the FACTS to refuse to act.

I sent on the 12th Feb, in my 8 page letter of complaint about the activities of Barrister Hobbs QC and what he did, to the Gov Legal Dpt and requesting they investigate it all. On their website they state that they will reply within 10 working days and then they would either give you their response or will tell you when they can. As I correctly thought would be the case, they have a month later, not even replied in any way.

In the last month the IPO have stated and confirmed that even today when they need an 'Appointed Person' to officiate at an Appeal Hearing, which was what Hobbs did, they get the A/P from the  Treasury Solicitors, now named the Government Legal Department. (YET THE GLD TOLD ME IN AN EMAIL RECENTLY THEY DO NOT DO THIS......so more lies from them) As I said in my last post it would them that I would now go to with this complaint about Hobbs and his unlawful and criminal actions.

Now on the GLD website they state that all lawyers and Barristers they use, actually work for that department, so they are not 'independent workers' and so it follows that as they are employees, the GLD MUST be responsible for their actions (as would the then Treasury Solicitors would have been)
Of course way back in around 2008 I complained to them about Hobbs and was fobbed of with the usual set of lies etc and all that and subsequent efforts of mine to get justice through a whole set of different bodies that all, only resulted in the usual lies as to what exactly the complaint was and how they could do nothing.

I sent the comprehensive complaint with all the detailing of what it was all about AND ACCOMPANIED BY a number of copies of documents that backed up my assertions and allegations. It went by registered post and was received by a GLD person called MARK on the 12th Feb.

I will put all these 8 documents onto this blog and will be seen on the right hand side of the first page or here, shortly  However I will now make comments on the highlighted lines that can be seen on those documents:- DOCUMENT 1. This is a letter sent me by the CEO of the Parl Ombudsman in reply to me asking them to investigate the MoJ for refusing to first of all, investigate Hobbs for his criminality and then stating they have no jurisdiction yet not stating why that was so. Then to cap it all ignoring my complaint about that.
You will see they say that the MoJ was correct in saying they have no jurisdiction. and they said that the MoJ had told me what route to take. They ignored my telling them that the routes they told of, were all rubbish and I'd told them anyway that I'd taken them all to no avail. Then they state as you will see in the highlighted lines that if I wished to go back and request they should look into this
claim they had no jurisdiction, then I should get back to them which I did but this was ignored in their subsequent reply......see Document 2.
DOCUMENT 2.
In this cover up document of three pages of waffle, you will see on page 2. (highlighted) that they, like EVERY liar in every government department I have complained to about Hobbs, again lie about how the MoJ cannot investigate Barristers as they are independent. Yet as I have said above in the case of Barristers working for the MoJ or the GLDpt, THEY ARE EMPLOYEES  and NOT independent workers who can just do what the hell they like as they are INDEPENDENT, which is the case when they work out of various CHAMBERS. ( A chambers is really only a collection of barristers all working out of offices at one location and are just a set of self employed high up lawyers, much like a bunch of plumbers or electricians all banding together in one workshop)
They also kindly say that the MoJ said I should complain to the IPO, and this despite me telling the MoJ that I had done that in 2007 and got nowhere as they used the same old lies. So just another web of lies, obfuscations and fobbing you off to get rid of you.
DOCUMENT 3. Proof that Barristers WORK for the GLD and are therefore EMPLOYEES.-IN ANY CASE NO MATTER WHETHER THE BARRISTER IS AN INDEPENDENT ENTITY OR AN EMPLOYEE UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE GLD-THEY ABSOLUTELY HAVE TO WORK UNDER THE RULE OF LAW AND HOBBS BROKE THE LAW-ESPECIALLY AS WHAT HE GOT UP TO ''PERVERTED THE COURSE OF JUSTICE' AND THAT IS A 'CRIMINAL ACT' AND THUS HE IS NOT ABOVE THE LAW AND SHOULD BE CHARGED FOR THIS 'CRIMINAL ACT' !!!!!!! OF COURSE THE LAW ESTABLISHMENT WILL DO ANYTHING TO COVER ALL THIS UP.....THE UTTER BASTARDS !!!!!!
DOCUMENT 4. Proof that a complaint will get a reply of sorts within 10 working days (14 days in fact)
DOCUMENT 5. Is my 8 page complaint sent into the GLD. The documents I sent in with that letter are:-
Doc 1.The IPO Hearing Officer Mr Landau and his summing up of the hearing in which he said Busbridge could not claim my Trade Mark. Can be seen elsewhere in this blog.
Doc 2. The IPO CEO's ( Mr Marchant) letter to me stating that the Landau decision meant I'd won.
Doc 3. Busbridges Appeal reasons (all rubbish and not legal so he should never have been given an appeal)
Doc 4.The IPO's Mr Colombo letter to me in which he explains the legal requirement to be met to be given an appeal.
Doc 5. The opinion of a Barrister called Antell reiterating the legal requirements needed to get an appeal.
Doc 6. The actual Hobbs bogus appeal hearing TRANSCRIPT.
Doc 7. Copy of the 'Self Litigants Handbook' which details what a Judge or Barrister hearing any court case and what they cannot do IE-GIVE ADVICE as Hobbs did.
Doc 8 Copy of the terms of service for 'Appointed Persons' which includes that they must not be biased, which Hobbs was and could be seen in the transcript to be so....by slagging me off and so on!!
Doc 9. Show that GLD Barristers are employees.
Doc 10. Letter from Mr Marchant, the then IPO CEO telling me the bogus Hobbs appeal hearing had been postponed (which is unlawful)
Doc 11. An Email from Colombo to Busbridge giving him advice-which is unlawful.
Doc 12. Another letter from the IPO to Busbridge giving him advice-unlawful.
Doc 13. Yet another letter to Busbridge giving him unlawful advice.
Doc 14. The Barrister P.Bush document in which he gives his opinion of most of the UNLAWFUL goings on at that bogus Appeal Hearing, officiated by Hobbs.
Doc 15 A Barrister called Simpson, who states that right at the beginning of my battle against Busbridge and Chrysler in 1992 should have been conjoined. This proves that the IPO had been up to no good.
Doc 16. GLD employment facts.

IF YOU READ THE WHOLE OF MY LETTER TO THE GLD, THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WILL BE EXPLAINED  AS TO RELEVANCE. MANY ARE ALREADY LISTED ON THIS BLOG, EITHER ON THE LIST OF DOCUMENTS FILE OR CONTAINED WITHIN VARIOUS POSTS.



Saturday, 2 March 2019

Corrupt MoJ & Government Legal Dpt

In my last post I told you that because the MoJ did their usual 'Not us Guv' act, I decided to go back to going after the very department that had employed Hobbs QC, the very man who was instrumental in conniving with the IPO in setting up and carrying out their plan to nobble me because I had won the last round and had this frustrated their obvious attempts to wrestle off me my legally gained and registered Trade Mark 'Viper'.

When this department was named the 'Treasury Solicitors' they had when I complained, used the usual brush off lies by telling me I had to complain to various complaints bodies (protection racket ombudsmen and complaints bodies in various gov legal departments ). This I had done with the inevitable brushing under the carpet results from every one of them and which took months and years.

So off went my complaints document/letter to this renamed mob and that went by registered post and was received on the 26th Feb by a 'Mark' drone employee. Now on the GLD website they arrogantly and incorrectly state that anyone sending in such a complaint (of any sort) can expect a reply within 10 working days (two weeks to be correct) and that if they have to say they have not been able in that time to finish any investigation etc (that's if they have ever done an investigation) they will still reply and tell you when you CAN EXPECT A DEFINITIVE REPLY TO YOUR ALLEGATIONS ETC.
Well folks that time is well and truly up and guess what? NOT A WORD FROM THEM!!!!!!!!

Well this is entirely to form, for all these civil servant assholes from whatever government department the wretches work in. So I'm not surprised one bit. So will give them another week, then it is a 'Formal Complaint' to them for not complying with their very own 'Policy Standards'. No doubt they will use the excuse if they ever do reply, that Brexit is to blame! Even though I fail to see how their department can be affected by Brexit as they are supposed to be dealing with our very own justice system etc and not anything to do with Brexit.

This is what one has to put up with from all our utterly wretched politicians and the departments they are supposed to control, when the truth is no Minister has a clue how to manage any government department. This can be readily seen just now by that grinning and useless Transport Minister idiot-
Chris Grayling......say no more.

Stay tuned for updates on what the Bastards do or don't do.


Friday, 15 February 2019

Corrupt Ministry of Justice Cont'd

In the days since my last post I have endeavoured to pin down the corrupt MoJ and the equally corrupt Government Legal Department. The GLD used to be called the Treasury Solicitors and they were the responsiblity of the MoJ. They as you will have seen, provided the Corrupt Barrister Hobbs QC, who did all the dirty deeds for the IPO at that bogus appeal hearing.
On the T/Sol website when they traded under that name, they clearly stated they were an arm of the MoJ, so in my mind that made the MoJ responsible for the criminal acts of their employee Hobbs. Hence my going after them. Remember their excuse made to the Parliamentary Ombudsman and to myself,  but without any explanation, was "We have no jurisdiction over this."
That led me to wonder if for once they may be telling the truth, so I decided to find out who is now providing Appointed Persons, as this Hobbs bum was, when he heard that bogus and unlawful hearing. So I emailed the MoJ and asked if they still provided A/P's to to the IPO and was told they did not. Of course they kept quiet as to who does. So my next step is to ask the IPO, but true to form when I emailled their general enquiries dpt, no one gave the simple answer but said they had passed it onto the relevant department. That just shows you how incompetent the IPO are when you simply cannot get any answer off them and this to a simple question. Of course nowhere on their useless website do they mention the answer when you search for it. Bet U, I will either get no answer as no doubt my email and name will flag up on their computer system, on which they no doubt keep the details of people they don't like. I remember that last year I asked another simple question and went through the same pantomime when they replied and refused to answer my then question, because they knew who I was. Same bloke replied who was responsible for the setting up and subseqent lies he made about very same 'BOGUS APPEAL HEARING', one Columbo ...he of the scruffy mack. I presume. (if you remember that TV series of the Yank detective)
So the upshot is that the corrupt wheels of the corrupt British Justice System continue to grind on denying people like me, access to JUSTICE for their CORRUPT ACTIONS !! Will detail where I get with this latest line of attack. In the meantime I've sent off my request for an investigation into the Hobbs QC actions and with all the documentary evidence to back up my allegations....including a copy of the TRANSCRIPT. Sent via Registered post so they cannot say they never got it. No doubt they will ignore it as so far they have not even acknowledged receipt, which normally they should do and tell you how many years you will have to wait to get a reply !!!

Monday, 28 January 2019

Corrupt Ministry of Justice-AGAIN

In past but fairly recent posts, I chronicled my efforts of complaining to the MoJ, that one of their employee Barristers, a Hobbs QC, who is viewed as the top Barrister in the Intellectual Property world and all matters to do with IP, cynically set up in conjunction with the top IPO legal man, a Mr James, a bogus alleged 'Appeal Hearing'.

Why set it up, is the question anyone would ask? Well it became clear after the dirty deed was done in 2005, that for some reason the IPO after confirming back in 1996 that I had legally proved my right to the Trade Mark 'Viper', (and this done for me by legal IP experts) had made 'A MISTAKE. They cynically said so at the last Tribunal Hearing in 2010...."we had made a mistake" and their way of 'correcting' this alleged mistake, was to subject me to a great number of corrupt actions, which started with the bogus appeal hearing and was absolutley pivoyable in governing all that happened after it. This was the ONLY WAY they could play enough dirty tricks that would eventuate in their ability to finalise their long held wish to strip me of my legitimately proven 'right' to that T/M. That they for some reason didn't want me to have. I have several theories as to why they felt this way, but how do I prove them??

So that bogus hearing or as I prefer to call it 'a meeting' had to be set up the way it was. For they had determined that the only way they could carry out the dirty tricks they had in mind, to 'wrestle' back my T/M, was to 'ADVISE' the little crook who had set his eyes of stealing that T/M (so he could sell it for £500K to Chrysler) and steal my well known sportscar manufacturing business, making a copy of my Cobra Replica which I had called 'VIPER'. (For those who may think I had copied the AC Cobra exactly-think again-for my chassis bore no relation to the AC and was Jag based, and the body was also quite different. It was more of a look-a-like than and exact replica, yet Busbridge copied my car 100% with no differences.) They simply should not have allowed his request for an appeal against the decision that had gone against him and given by a Hearing Officer called Landau. For the crook Busbridge, his criminal game was really over. He had no legal bona-fide rights to any sort of appeal, yet they gave him one. WHY???

They could hardly tell him;  'come to the IPO HQ and we will give you a bucket full of legal advice....all shonky of course-which will enable you to get out of the legal corner you are now in'.....could they ?? But they could and did as I say, illegally give him this shonky appeal hearing, which would enable them to come face to face with him and this all dressed up as a bona-fide appeal hearing. But once that cynical and bogus meeting started, they never carried out any pucka appeal hearing at all and that can clearly be seen if you bother to read the transcript of it which can be seen at the right hand column on this blog. All you will see is 47 pages of legal advice giving which is strictly forbidden, yet they obvioulsy thought......"Who is going to know all this and who can do anything aagainst us as we HAVE THE POWER" .....BASTARDS.

Why else did they refuse me attendance (illegally) of this meeting? Why else did they not tell me that I could have attended as a member of the Public.?? Why else did they refuse, despite my asking many times over 15 months as did my MP, where is the decision of what we thought had been a pucka APPEAL HEARING??????? They lied through their back teeth each and every time....IT'S ALL THERE IN BLACK AND WHITE AND THEY EVEN LIED TO MY MP, SO CONFIDENT WERE THEY THAT NO ONE COULD TOUCH THEM !!!!!!

Eventually I was told that the appeal had been droppped by Busbridge after he'd been given all that legal advice and told what to do, which included dropping the BOGUS appeal. The IPO said they would then go on and help him to carry out their advice....it's all there in the transcript which they never thought I'd get my hands on. Of course this all explains the extraordinary lengths involved thereafter and including others in the Justice Establishment, who have for 8 years now tried to bury all this and cover it up.

You will have seen my recent efforts to get the MoJ to take legal action or at least see that legal action is taken against Hobbs for his criminality. You will have seen their lies and squirming, to get out of it by claiming they have no jurisdiction to 'do anything' That they will not even say why they have no 'JURISDICTION !! This even the Parliamentary Ombudsman, who are set up to make sure that all government departments act legally and competently and so on, they have also lied by saying they cannot make the MoJ take action, when that is CLEARLY NOT WHAT I HAD ASKED THEM TO DO, AS WHAT I HAD ASKED, WAS "JUST ASK THE MOJ TO EXPLAIN WHY THEY HAVE NO JURISDICTION OVER ONE OF THEIR EMPLOYEES?" ITS JUST MORE SQUIRMING AND TRYING IT ON.

If one reads the MoJ website you will see it is clearly stated in their various boasts of what they are about and that all the lawyers and Barristers that work for them in their arm of justice, called the Government Legal Department, are employees.  Not as elsewhere in the justice system where Barristers cannot be touched, as they are completely independent of anyone (like Judges). Thus this gives them the ability to carry out such illegal activities as Hobbs did and with absolute impunity.
However as I state, as Hobbs was not independent like that, so he should be answerable to his bosses- the MoJ.  For his criminal behaviour at that bogus held meeting, dressed up as an appeal hearing. Hence why the MoJ simply refuses to answer my questions and is obfuscating and lying in order to fob me off and cover it all up.
I am going to one last time write to the snake oil salesman, a Mr Jake Hancock,of the Parliamentary Ombudsman, a supreme lying shit who terms himself as a 'INTAKE CASE WORKER' but in reality is just a pen-pushing jerk whose job is to FUCK UP ANYONE with the temerity to try and expose the one bastard in this government department, who should be in jail!! I will AGAIN TELL HIM I WANT AN ANSWER AS TO WHY THE MOJ HAS NO JURISDICTION TO SEE ONE OF ITS EMPLOYES FACE THE LAW OF THE LAND ?????? AFTER ALL ISN'T THAT THE JOB OF THE MOJ....AND TO SEE LAWS ARE OBEYED AND 'JUSTICE IS DONE AND BE SEEN TO BE DONE??????

I got a reply from arch snake oil salesman, Jake Hancock, in which he simply said he couldn't add to anything he'd already said in his last letter where he covered up for the MoJ as stated above. Again he chose to ignore me saying that I'd asked him to get the MoJ to state why they had no jurisdiction and I'd not asked him to get the MOJ to take action merely to answer a simpls queation.....YOU SEE THIS IS HOW THESE ASSHOLE CIVIL SERVANTS WORK: You ask a simple question they don't want to answer as it will give the game away, so they change it slightly, to you asking something similar but quite different and then they can make their lying excuses. You can go back a HUNDRED TIMES pointing out what they've done, yet they just either ignore you or tell you to go away, or they just repeat their lying excuses ad infinitum. 

Members of the British Public are being denied legal aid to bring such cases as mine, or ANY cases re ANYTHING except of course if you are a criminal juts like the recent case of that young bloke who got his girlfriend killed in his speed boat lark. He failed to turn up at his court case for manslaughter and wnet to Georgia. YET THE LEGAL AID BOARD GAVE HIM LEGAL AID TO FIGHT AN APPEAL WHILE HE WAS ON THE RUN !!!! tHIS IS THE BARMY COUNTRY WE LIVE IN . My case has ramifications for the justice system and therefore is IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST to be held and exposed.THIS IS HOW OUR MUCH LAUDED JUSTICE SYSTEM IS BEING RUN IN OUR BROKEN COUNTRY. No wonder they are doing everything to hide it, cover it up and so on. ARE YOU PROUD TO BE BRITISH????

 

Sunday, 27 January 2019

Corrupt Ministry of Justice + Irwin Mitchell LLP Pt2

In my last post I told you about the letter I sent to the CEO of Irwin Mitchell complaining that I'd been lied to and none of the flowery promises made on their website were true but just all bullshit.

Well that letter was 3 pages long and detailed. The eventual reply I got WAS NOT FROM THE CEO
BUT FROM THE VERY PERSON I COMPLAINED ABOUT. Not one issue I detailed was dealt with and you can see this and my letter as laid out below:-

 
FAO Mr Andrew Tucker,
Chief Executive Officer,
Irwin Mitchell,
Millsands,
Sheffield,
S.8NH.

28/12/18.

Dear Mr Tucker,

SOME FACTS YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT HOW YOUR COMPANY IS TREATING
PEOPLE SEEKING HELP FROM YOU - I DO HOPE YOU READ ALL THIS & DON’T BIN IT OR PUSH IT DOWN TO A CLERK OF YOURS, WHO AGAIN WILL NOT DEAL WITH IT, BECAUSE THEY MESS IT UP BY NOT GRASPING THE REAL FACTS.

I am one such person and on researching what your companies attitude is to my type of problem, I saw the following flowery words: “Infringement of your Human Rights can take on many forms and you need a legal team that understands the nuances of these cases across different areas of law. Our Public Law experts have the expertise you need to build a strong case and will fight to get the justice you deserve”…...(PULL THE OTHER ONE ??)

Now I thought that is EXACTLY what I need and that thought was further strengthened when I read further on, under ‘Human Rights’ ;- “Specialising in human rights with particular experience
challenging abuses, fundamental rights and freedoms that everyone in the UK is entitled to”
Then under the heading of ‘Pro-bono’Advise and support those who need it the most, yet who are often the least able to afford it-is at the heart of Irwin Probono philosophy”

As I said, all very heartening and such flowery words and promises, which gave me hope to at last be able to get the legal help I have strived to get for so long. So I rang your London office and spoke to someone to whom I very briefly described my problem. He told me he would have words with others to find who would be best placed to deal with this and they would get back to me. A Mr Ravil Hirani rang me back and I had a quite long conversation with him, when I briefly outlined my problem.

He told me he worked with IP and because I had outlined, that indirectly my problem had been brought about by the IPO, he had been asked to respond. I told him that the problem was not concerning IP at all , but the criminal actions of an IPO legal manager, together with a Barrister QC from the then Treasury Solicitors. Their combined actions had resulted in perverting the course of justice and my subsequent human rights being trashed. That had helped ruin my life and despite going down every possible avenue of complaints procedures with every government department I had to turn to, all I had met was a wall of lies and covering up. This had taken me years to get through, before I turned to writing to the Justice Minister, Gauke, and then the PM, Mrs May. Both had simply passed on my complaints about the MoJ, back to them and predictably I got nowhere. They brushed me off by telling me they had no jurisdiction to take action, yet it was one of their Barristers who had committed criminal actions-it beggars belief that they said this, when they are responsible for our justice system and presumably they think it is quite OK for one of their employees to break the law, while they did nothing!

Now given all your flowery words and promises, what I got back is not what I expected to hear. Especially as when I had spoken with Mr Hirani, I had told him that the law breaking had taken place at a meeting that the IPO had set up under the guise of it being an ‘Appeal Hearing’ brought about by my ex business agent, when he had lost to me at a previous tribunal hearing. I was denied attendance to this alleged appeal hearing, but when I saw the transcript of it some two years later, I could see that it had not been a bona-fide ‘appeal hearing’ but a meeting set up under the guise of it being an appeal hearing. This enabled the IPO through the barrister, to give unlimited legal advice as to how my opponent could circumvent the decision against him and that is exactly what he did. He was aided by the IPO and that resulted in 2010, with the IPO taking my legally registered T/M off me. I bet here you are not believing this and will think it’s a figment of my imagination. Anyway I told Hirani that if someone read this transcript they would see that what I am alleging, is 100% true.

He told me to send via email that transcript, plus the letter from the IPO to me telling me I could not attend that alleged appeal hearing. Which by the way, my opponent had no bona-fide right to have an appeal, in any case. So I send him via email, copies of the proof that it was a bogus hearing, and by separate email via ‘we transfer’ service, the 48 pages of the transcript. The reply on the 12th Dec with a reference number of FID1331954, was not at all what I expected to get from your company, given that I thought you were honest and experts in what you do. I had opined that this case came under ‘PUBLIC LAW/PUBLIC INTEREST’ and he said that that department had said it should have been dealt with by a Judicial Review. This after I had specifically pointed out to him that the IPO had taken 15 months to tell me the outcome of what I had thought was a bona-fide appeal hearing which turned out not to be one at all. So no decision had been made ( and no Judicial Review can be applicable) and I realised I had been stitched up. It took me another year to get a transcript and so to see exactly how I had been stitched up, by it being a massive legal advice giving session and not an ‘appeal hearing’. I know full well about JR’s and they are not applicable here, as no bona-fide appeal hearing took place and so no decision to have a review on, plus things had been manipulated by the IPO to make sure the time scales were too long, anyway, that is to the time I realised the unlawfulness had taken place.

I replied to this garbled response on the 13th Dec and you should read what I said, so I will not repeat what I said, here. Given that I had clearly set out that such a case can attract Legal Aid and I’d sent him copy of the Legal Aid Board letter to me saying it was-for such a case, to have him now telling me that it doesn’t and that if I paid £20K-£25K on account, you would start with a case. Given that right at the beginning I had told Hirani that I was penniless, otherwise I would have taken my own legal action way back, to then be asked to pay, shows that your staff were not giving this any thought to what I’d said and were in actual fact insulting me. Plus so much for your Pro-bono, flowery words.

Worse than that, after I had sent Hirani my email of the 13th complaining about aspects of what he had said, I then got an email back on the 21st from him in which he said “The relevant teams reviewed the information (copies of emails and letters & THE TRANSCRIPT) you provided us”
Now when you send a long document via ‘we transfer’ they tell you if it has been opened and yet they informed me that it was never opened. So lies are being told here and that is DISGUSTING and had they read that transcript they would have seen I have a case, as legal advice was given in bucket loads and so on and THAT IS SIMPLY UNLAWFUL !!

Then it was said that I wanted to bring a private prosecution and that was not covered by legal aid.
However I did not say I wanted this, as I have no money to do so. I had always strived to get this dealt with by the departments concerned internally and that is why I chose to go down ALL the routes open to me, like the IPO CEO, The Treasury Solicitors Office, JACO and OJC, and the Bar Standards Board, to mention just a few. With everyone of them stonewalling & lying to me to cover it all up. Yet under Public Law/Public Interest, this in my opinion absolutely comes under that, it is, as I showed in the Legal Aid Board reply, that legal aid can be given. For a government department to behave in this way is a National Disgrace and must be exposed and how can a private individual do that? Are they to be allowed to get away with it, simply because they put me into penury?? Then what about your boast of Pro-bono??

Plus advising that it is a Police matter is a joke, when they refused before to take any action against the IPO in 2010/11 when I went to the Dorset Police with my very substantial dossier. The IPO simply slagged me off, denigrated me to hell and lied about the law to the thick copper. It was made plain to me then, that I would be wasting my time going to them again to get them to mount an investigation into what went on at that bogus hearing, even when all of it was criminal and shown in black and white.

So my comments to you are:- WHY ARE YOU INTIMATING ON YOUR WEBSITE THAT YOU DO PRO-BONO AND THAT YOU DO HUMAN RIGHTS WHEN IT SEEMS YOU DON’T.

PLUS WHY ARE YOUR STAFF LYING AND SAYING THEY HAVE GONE OVER THE DOCUMENTS THEY TOLD ME TO SEND, WHEN IT IS CLEAR THEY HAVEN’T. WHY IS IT THAT DESPITE STATING YOU WILL GIVE ADVICE, WHEN ALL YOU WANT IS MONEY BEING PAID TO YOU? However there is one way I can find money to pay any lawyer if no lawyer in the UK really does Pro-bono, and that is to crowd fund my case. I have found a London firm of lawyers who run a website called CrowdJustice, but I can only get my story onto that website if I can get a law firm like yours to agree ‘In Priniciple’ that they will act for me when whatever level of money that is needed is raised. Surely with all your promises as outlined above, if all they are are Scots mist and or B/S, you would at least agree to that?? Please let me know.

Under HRA Article 6, I have had my rights abused both by the police and the IPO and the MoJ. However it seems to me that in the UK today, ones H/Rights only applies to immigrants.

So are you going to be yet another law entity prepared to whitewash this and fail to come up to your claims and thus aiding law breakers in government ?? Please don’t tell me I can go to the Law Society or any Ombudsman as they are all a con on the Public and only protect all in the law industry.

Will it be too much to give me the decency of a reply and better still one that means you are willing to stand by your promises? If you had any brains and foresight, and got all the facts that I have not so far divulged to you, you would see that this is a massive case, that when exposed to the Public, would get you untold and free exposure for your company, thus showing how good you are at exposing corruption in high places. And that can’t be bad unless of course you don’t want to rock the Justice System boat and risk putting your nose out of place with your fellow Law Establishment Johnnies????

Regards,



Ken Cook,
Bournemouth,

Their reply


24 January 2019

Dear Mr Cook.  YOUR LETTER OF COMPLAINT. I acknowledge your letter dated 28 December 2018, addressed to Andrew Tucker.I have been given delegated authority by Mr Tucker to respond to your letter. Please accept my sincere apologies for the delay in replying.The information provided in my email dated 13 December 2018 and letter dated 21 December 2018 stands. Both correspondence set out in full the reason why we have decided that we cannot pursue this matter on your behalf. I understand that you do not agree with our decision.

However, I again refer you to the Legal Ombudsman should you remain dissatisfied. I also remind you that if you choose to refer your concern to the Legal Ombudsman, you must do so by no later than 20 June 2019.I am satisfied that your concern has already been addressed and dealt with sufficiently by this firm. We will not enter into protracted correspondence with you regarding this matter. Therefore, any further communications you send to this firm will be placed on our file but will not be responded to.

Yours sincerely, RAVIL HIRANI

SOLICITOR
 For and on behalf of IRWIN MITCHELL LLP 

So if you read my letter and the points I made about what was said to me and how I was lied to etc, and then read the short above reply.....YOU WILL SEE THAT NOT ONE OF MY COMMENTS/POINTS AND FACTS I BROUGHT UP ARE DEALT WITH and
furthemore if you write in again they will just bin your letter.
Now this is exactly how one gets treated, not only by shyster lawyers but their twins in the civil service. No matter what argument and comments/points you make, they ignore 98% of them and only remark on a point which they feel they can rubbish. IT IS ABSOLUTELY OUTRAGEOUS BECAUSE IT MEANS YOU SIMPLY CANNOT GET ANYWHERE WITH ANY OF THESE ASSHOLE ESTABLISHMENT JOHNNIES-THEY JUST BRICKWALL YOU AND YOU'RE HELPLESS & THEY KNOW IT. FOR THEY KNOW YOU DO NOT HAVE THE CASH TO GET THEM INTO A COURT AND THAT IS ONLY PROVIDING YOU CAN FIND AN HONEST BARRISTER TO TIE THEM UP IN KNOTS, OVER ALL THEIR CORRUPT ACTIONS AND LIES.

IN MY NEXT POST COMING UP I WILL SHOW YOU THE EXACT SAME CORRUPT ACTIONS, BUT THIS TIME CARRIED OUT BY THE PARLIAMENTARY OMBUDSMAN WHO REFUSE TO EVEN ASK THE MoJ A SIMPLE QUESTION. 

Monday, 21 January 2019

Corrupt Ministry of Justice & Andrew Mitchel LLP

This law firm can join the long list of such solicitors that I have attempted to get help from for years now. I will not explain every attempt as I don't wish to lose the will to live. Suffice it to say that recently after getting nowhere as I've chronicled, with the MoJ, Gauky-Gauke MP (Minister for Justice (what a joke he is) and Saint Teresa May, of the Order of 'Useless Gits', I thought I'd have a go to try and raise enough money to take on a Barrister. You will have seen in previous posts that the only way that could happen is through CrowdJustice website,  if  'in principle' I could get a law firm to accept to take on my case and state this, so the solicitors running this would then allow me to open a case on their website.

So I went through trying to find big companies who profess to cover 'PUBLIC INTEREST' cases and or 'PUBLIC LAW' cases AND 'Human Rights' cases. With the latter I think I've stated already that I have over the years tried most of the HRA law firms and found that every one of them, because I am WHITE and not an illegal IMMIGRANT or an immigrant trying to wheedle their way into the UK by lying and professing to be a genuine asylum seeker, they are simply not interested in giving access to JUSTICE to any white honky person !!!

However I came across three companies I thought I'd try:- 3PB who have a brsnch office not a couple of miles awy from me, but they just gave me the usual evasive run around for weeks on end, then Leigh Day in London, even though they have a stinking reputation which I will cover ahead, and lastly IRWIN MITCHELL who boasted on their website with big flowery claims:-

" Human Rights- specialists in human rights with particular experience in challenging abuses and setting out fundamental rights & freedoms that everyone in the UK is entitled to"......then -
"Irwin Mitchel-the Expert Hand with the Human Touch" aah....got me crying with excitement there!
Under pro-Bono- "advise & support those who need it the most, yet are often least able to afford it- is at the very heart of Irwin Mitchel pro-Bono philosophy"

Well wouldn't anyone reading all that SHIT, BELIEVE that here was a law company right up my street, for all those flowery LYING promises covered EXACTLY what I was looking for and NEEDED!! So I rang them and explained to the clerk who answered in their London office, that I had a wish to see a Barrister investigated and charged, who had committed criminal actions in a bogus hearing he had held and at which I had been denied attendance, even though they were dealing with my IP Rights. I stressed that it was not about IP but about CRIMINAL ACTIONS COMMITTED BY THIS BARRISTER.

I told him that for some 8 years now I had been trying to get him dealt with by every government legal entity under the sun, but had been only lied to so I could see that all they were interested in, was covering it up. Would they take it on? I told him that my evidence could all be seen in ONE DOCUMENT - namely the transcript of that meeting which someone would have to read to see I was telling the truth and actually had a case. He told me he would have to (being merely only a clerk) find a lawyer who could/would take it on and he would get back to me.
Which he did and then asked me to send him copy of that transcript plus any other documents backing it up. I said I would do that and so did so. I sent him an email which briefly went over what I'd said verbally, which was to give the minimum outline of the case. Plus this 48 page transcript sent via  the 'wetransfer' service that can send multiple paged emails. I also included some supporting document as attachments to the main email.

I then received a reply within about a week that typifies all the same 50-60 law firms I've tried over the past 8 years. What these assholes do is enough to send anyone 'Raging mad' at the duplicity and lies they come out with. First they said I was asking for ADVICE when I was asking for REPRESENTATION OF MY CASE, either through crowdfunding or Prob-Bono or even Legal Aid (which in this case the Legal Aid Board had confirmed in writing was because it was in the 'Public Interest' they could fund). I sent him a copy of that confirmation.
They then said it was unlikely to be an Intellectual Property matter. (THIS WHEN I'D TOLD THEM THIS-RIGHT AT THE BEGINNING !!
Then they said the 'Public Law team said that it would come under a 'Judicial Review' BUT I'D ALREADY TOLD THEM AT THE BEGINNING THAT I KNEW THAT WAS OUT BECAUSE OF THE TIME SCALE ETC. Aren't these assholes just utterly useless and all they are doing is giving you crap to get rid of you because they think you know NOTHING, so they can pull the wool over your eyes with SHIT.
But Hey! they could assist with me bringing a 'Private Prosecution'  but no legal aid so that will cost you-AND this AFTER I'D MADE IT CLEAR I HAD NO MONEY. (Otherwise if I had, it would have been done 8 years ago!!!!!!) So send us on account £20K to start the ball rolling....THEY MAKE ME ABSOLUTELY SICK.....AND ALL THESE LAW FIRMS ARE THE SAME, UNLESS OF COURSE YOU ARE IN THE COUNTRY ILLEGALLY AND ARE TRYING TO STAY HERE BY ANY PACK OF LIES YOU CAN THINK OF !!!  THEN THEY ARE ALL OVER YOU LIKE A BAD RASH AND IT'S ALL PAID FOR BY THE SUCKER TAXPAYERS.

The solicitor who was writing to me all this crap, a Mr Ravi Hirani (see what I mean) waffled on about me needing to take out this private prosecution against this Barrister for 'perjury and perverting the course of justice', (I never mentioned perjury) and the evidence which may be present in the information you provided (the transcript) but the evidential threshold is high and our view is that there are no grounds to prosecute for these offences.
NOW TO SAY THAT-THEY WOULD HAVE TO HAVE READ THAT TRANSCRIPT AND I HAD BEEN SENT AN EMAIL BY THE EMAIL SERVICE PROVIDER 'WETRANSFER', THAT MY EMAIL CONTAINING THE TRANSCRIPT HAD NOT BEEN OPENED !! SO I AM BEING TOLD A PACK OF LIES ABOUT THE EVIDENCE NOT BEING STRONG ENOUGH, WHEN THEY HAVEN'T EVEN SEEN OR READ THE EVIDENCE AND THEY IGNORED MY TELLING THEM I'D ALREADY HAD A CRIMINAL BARRISTERS OPINION WHO 'DID' READ THE TRANSCRIPT, AND THAT 11 COUNTS OF UNLAWFULNESS HAD TAKEN PLACE.

So you see this is what I've been up against all along. Solicitors who boast on their websites that they do all that I've outlined above, but seemingly I am the wrong colour. Plus, to really give AN INFORMED AND PROPER REASONING ON SUCH AS COMPLICATED CASE, THEY WOULD HAVE HAD TO INTERVIEW ME AND SEE OTHER DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE ETC, ETC. No, what it all it amounts to, is a pack of lies so they can slide out of taking it on and against ONE OF THEIR OWN KIND AND THAT IS THE CRUX OF ALL THAT-IF THE TRUTH WERE BEING TOLD.   THEN, WHAT ABOUT THEIR BOASTS OF DOING THINGS ON 'PRO-BONO??? That went out of the window it seems.
I was so mad I wrote to their CEO of their UK set up, at their Sheffield branch-A MR ANDREW TUCKER. I complained that I had been lied to and that my request had been dealt with incompetently, as they had not read the main evidential document, namely 'The Transcript' and that all I had laid out to them, seemingly had been totlally misread, or more to it....not even understood.
That all their flowery promises on their website were all HORSE-SHIT AND TOTAL LIES TO BOOT, If the real truth were to be admitted. (I didn't swear either)
What was the result of that??????  TOTAL SILENCE AND NOT EVEN A CONFIRMATION OF RECEIPT OF MY LETTER STATING I'S BEEN LIED TO WHICH WENT REGISTERED MAIL AFTER MY FIRST LETTER BY 'SIGNED FOR' WENT MYSTERIOUSLY 'WALK ABOUT'. AND THAT REALLY CONFIRMS WHAT SHITS THAT LAW FIRM WHO BOAST THEY ARE IN THE TOP 10 LAW FIRMS IN THE COUNTRY !!!???

Now to that firm Leigh Day.......If like me, you keep up daily, with all the UK news in papers and on TV News progs, you will have in the near past read about Martyn Day of  'Leigh Day LLP'. This umitigated RAT is the turd who has been happily going after BRIT SOLDIERS who served in Iraq saying they had committed criminal actions against the rabble there and that based on the word of that same lying rabble. OF COURSE ALL THAT WAS DONE ON LEGAL AID - he made millions while our useless justice system let him get away with all that. Then after years, because of the outraged Public comments, they belatedly did him. But I doubt he ever got a prison sentence for what he did to our soldiers. (Having been in the Services myself and all over the Middle East, I know EXACTLY what the natives are like and then (50's/60's) we had a saying anongst very many about the 'Westernised Oriental Gentlemen' (QUEEN VICTORIA COINED THAT PHRASE SO I FEEL IT LEGIT TO USE IT!!of that area and that was 'NEVER TRUST A WOG THEY ARE ALL LIARS AND TIE EVERYTHING DOWN SO IT CAN'T GET THIEVED.

Anyhow, I thought seeing that the main character of Leigh Day was out of it now, maybe they were behaving  properly and it was worth having a try. Off went a letter enquiring if they would handle a
HRA case committed against me by a UK Barrister. Eventually they wrote back knocking me back for they were extremely busy so not taking on any 'new' cases and did not do those kinds of cases anyway.
Well of course, they will be busy protecting all those illegals trying it on and not willing to stick their necks out trying to take on the British Establishment. I'd foolishly thought that maybe they were as sick of the British Legal Establishment seeing as they given Leigh Day a good kicking. How wrong AGAIN and no doubt they are still busy going after 'Our Lads' and getting the trash of the World into 'soft touch' UK.
  

Friday, 30 November 2018

Corrupt Ministry of Justice & croney Barristers/lawyers

The more I've seen of our alleged whiter than white justice system, the more I see just how rotten and corrupt it is, just like all our politicians are.

My long fight to get justice over how civil servants wrecked my business and life with all their corrupt acts has been thwarted at every turn by endless corrupt actions and some downright criminal. The Barrister Hobbs QC who committed more than 11 unlawful acts in that 2007 bogus appeal hearing needed to be brought to pay for his criminal actions. Yet, unless you are rich how can you ever get justice? For all the avenues I took, going down endless complaints procedures, you will have seen got me nowhere. Similarly going to Tory Ministers and Saint Teresa May also got the same treatment.

So one ends up in a place where you can only try to get some lawyer or Barrister to take on your case
on pro-bono or legal aid and of course non will. But the thing is, that after approaching over 50 law firms the overwhelming feeling you get is that non of them will take on your case because to do so means they will be fighting ONE OF THEIR OWN! and it is quite obvious to me now that absolutely none of them will do that.

I approached a local chambers of Barristers who have offices around the UK and in the first instance I verbally outlined to a barristers clerk what my case entailed, just to see if it had a chance. He thought it had and told me to send in the transcript of that meeting and the legal opinion I have and he would see who would take it on. Just been told that no one could take it on, but no explanation as to why that was. Plus in this case I was not asking for someone to take it on right now, as all I wished is that a barrister would in principle agree to take it on ....WHEN I HAD RAISED SAY A £100K THROUGH CROWDFUNDING. The legal crowdfunding site I'd found would only handle the case if I had someone standing by to take it on and be able to receive funds as they came in as they do not send monies to anyone other than a lawyer. Quite right too.

So now all that means that because we in the UK have a complete law system that is so corrupt that any lawyer and especially a barrister can commit any unlawful criminal act/acts in the full knowledge that they will escape justice. For if they know the person against whom they have committed those criminla acts, has no money, they are safe. One wonders if I did indeed have the money.......
WOULD ANY LAW FIRM TAKE ON A CASE WHEN THEY KNEW IT WAS AGAINST ANOTHER LAW FIRM AND SPECIFICALLY A BARRISTER??

Of course there will be some out there who will say: Well you can take it to the Police. Yet when in 2011 I went to my local Dorset Police about how over 200 acts of perjury and 5 forged documents were submitted in the 2004 hearing and that the IPO refused to act about that, they refused to take on an investigation and blatently colluded with the IPO. As the very same IPO were part of that bogus hearing and cynically colluded with Hobbs illegal acts, how can I have any confidence that the Police will now act when it is clear to all that today the Police hardly investigates ANYTHING !! I WOULD BE WASTING MY TIME.

Not only is all the above bad enough for anyone trying to get Justice in this rotten country of ours, but when you try our illustrious newspapers to look at all this NOT ONE IS IN THE SLIGHTEST BIT INTERESTED! A while back the 'Sunday Times ran a whole front page on how fantastic newspaper they were who were not afraid to investigate anything even if it were committed by government. This was written by their Editor and so I wrote to him TWICE giving a brief outline at what I had had to go through and asking him to keep to his promise and look at my case...DID NOT EVEN REPLY TO EITHER LETTER. SO MUCH FOR OUR NEWSPAPERS AND THE TIMES OF ALL PAPERS, IS AS BAD AS OUR CORRUPT POLITICIANS AND THEIR CIVIL SERVANTS AND OUR ROTTEN SO CALLED 'JUSTICE SYTEEM'