I SENT IN ALL THE LETTERS AND DOCUMENTS AS SEEN BELOW, TO ELLWOOD MP ON THE 10TH APRIL AND HE TOOK 3 WEEKS TO GET BACK TO ME AND THAT WAS ONLY BECAUSE I SENT HIM AN EMAIL ASKING WHY I HAD NOT RECEIVED AN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FROM HIM THAT HE HAD RECEIVED IT ALL AND HAD SENT IT ON TO THE OMBUDSMAN. THIS IS WHAT YOU HAVE TO PUT UP WITH.
However he told me that as I had not included a Form that the Ombudsman insist you fill in to send with the complaint (More stifling bureaucracy as you end up supplying the same info as included in you complaint letter) and so he could not send it in. I have now filled it in its gone off to him.
HOWEVER THE TELLING THING HERE IS THAT I HAD ASKED HIM TO READ MY COMPLAINT SO HE COULD SEE WHAT I WAS UP AGAINST, NOT ONLY BECAUSE THE GLD HAD LIED TO ME BUT THE OVERALL SITUATION IS THAT THE JUSTICE ESTABLISHMENT WERE TRYING TO BRUSH ALL THIS UNDER THE CARPET AND HOW COULD HE HELP ME AS MY MP. PLUS HE BOASTS THAT HE SPECIALISES IN HELPING VETS WHICH I AM. IT IS TELLING THAT HE IGNORED ALL OF THAT AND JUST TOLD ME TO LET THE OMBUDSMAN DEAL WITH THE COMPLAINT.
IN OTHER WORDS HE WAS NOT INTERESTED IN HELPING AT ALL AND I AM GOING TO GET BACK TO HIM AND INSIST HE DOES.
So for the latest in this shocking saga of a rampant corrupt Justice department that astonishingly gives out legal advice to our useless government, yet it is itself, corrupt !! AND THIS IS WHY AT THE MOMENT, OUR USELESS MRS MAY IS BEING FED CRAP LEGAL ADVICE AND SO IS BEING SHAT ON BY THE EU....SO MUCH FOR THE GLD !! I had sent the CEO of this utter shower, a Formal Complaint about how is department was lying to me. I sent him copies of the emails I'd sent in asking various questions and getting no answers and being lied to when they told me that they never supplied Appointed Persons to the IPO.
I EVEN SENT HIM A COPY OF THE EMAIL THE IPO SENT ME A WEEK AGO THAT CONFIRMED THAT THEY, WHEN THEY WANTED AN APPOINTED PERSON TO OFFICIATE IN AN APPEAL HEARING ........IT WENT TO THE GOVERNMENT LEGAL DEPARTMENT !!!!
But no, these utter assholes are so arrogant and so cocksure that they can do whatever the hell they like.....AND GET AWAY WITH IT !!!!!! They tell the most outright and clear LIES AND WHO THE HELL IS GOING TO BE ABLE TO STOP THEM??????
I asked him reasonable questions about Appointed Persons and who supplied them, if they say they don't and more importantly WHO PAYS them. Is the IPO lying?? Well I sent him several documents which showed beyond doubt, that the GLD or Treasury Solicitors as they are also called, supplied them, I included documents that showed that when I MYSELF ASKED THAT AN APPEAL HEARING OF MINE BE HELD BEFORE AN APPOINTED PERSON, SHE WAS SUPPLIED BY....YES....THE T/SOL !!!.
The asshole CEO called Jonathon Jones,, so smug is he, that he told me as if I did not know, that if I were dissatisfied with his short letter and bunch of lies to my 3 page letter....well I could take it to the Parliamentary Ombudsman. YES THE SAME CORRUPT BUNCH WHO RECENTLY COVERED UP FOR THE MINISTRY OF JUSTICE OVER THE SAME TOPIC WHEN THEY OBFUSCATED AND LIED. SO HE KNOWS THEY WILL ALSO COVER UP FOR HIM AND ALL I WILL GET IS ANOTHER BUCKET FULL OF LIES ETC FROM THEM.
WATCH THIS SPACE TO SEE THAT ALL HAPPENS, AS MY COMPLAINT ABOUT THE GLD HAS NOW GONE IN AND WHILE I WAS AT IT, AS IT HAS TO GO TO THEM VIA YOUR MP,
I ASKED HIM (ELLWOOD) TO READ IT ALL AND TELL ME HOW HE COULD ACT AND HELP ME OVER THIS MONSTROUS EXAMPLE OF OUR CORRUPT JUSTICE SYSTEM.
AS HE BOASTS HE IS THE DEFENCE MINISTRY SPECIALIST FOR VETERANS......I POINTED OUT THAT I WAS A VETERAN OF 8YEARS IN THE RAF AND HAD BEEN ON ACTIVE SERVICE TWICE IN CYPRUS AND ADEN. (UNLIKE HIS CLEAN 5 YEARS) SO WHAT WAS HE GOING TO DO TO HELP A FELLOW VET????? PLACE YOUR BETS, FOR THIS MAN IS ONLY INTERESTED IN CLIMBING THE GREASY POLE AND ALL HE THINKS ABOUT NOW IS BECOMING OUR NEXT USELESS PM !!!!
WHEN I GET TIME, I WILL POST ONTO THIS POST THE LETTERS AND DOCUMENTS I SENT THE CEO OF THE GLD PLUS MY LETTER TO THE PARLIAMENTARY OMBUDSMAN
ASKING THEM TO INVESTIGATE WHAT THE GLD HAVE DONE.
PLACE YOUR BETS NOW THAT ALL I WILL GET IS LIES,OBFUSCATIONS, EXCUSES AND WORST OF ALL EXCUSES AS TO HOW THEY CANNOT INVESTIGATE.
*********************************************************************************
FIRSTLY I SHOW THE LETTER I SENT THE OMBUDSMAN :-
The Parliamentary
Ombudsman,
Millbank Tower,
Millbank,
London.
9/4/19.
Dear Sirs,
FORMAL COMPLAINT RE
THE GOVERNMENT LEGAL DEPARTMENT.
Background.
In 2007 a Barrister,
one Hobbs QC acted as an Appointed Person on behalf of an Appellant
who was appealing a decision the Intellectual Property Office had
made against him. Although the subject matter was about my
registered Trade Mark, I was refused attendance. I subsequently found
that Hobbs had at the alleged hearing, committed several unlawful
acts that perverted the course of justice and against me.
The alleged hearing
was NEVER an appeal hearing, but a meeting where Hobbs gave the
Appellant
legal advice which
if he acted out would circumvent the decision which went against him.
This was unlawful on several counts. I have a criminal Barristers
opinion that this was the case. Over the past years I have tried to
obtain justice over this and to cut a long story short, last year I
arrived in my fight to the point where knowing that the Barrister who
had been supplied to the IPO by the Treasury Solicitors, now known as
the Government Legal Department, to the IPO, who I believed were an
arm of the Ministry of Justice as it said they were at thaT time of
around 2008/9.
I accordingly asked
the MoJ to investigate the unlawful actions of Hobbs who was not
independent and working through a Barristers Chambers, but was an
employee of the T.Sol. THIS WAS NOT A CASE OF A JUDICIAL HEARING HELD
IN A QUASI JUDICIAL TRIBUNAL HEARING, NO DECISION HAD BEEN MADE AS
HOBBS ADVISED THE APPELLANT TO DROP THE APPEAL. So making excuses
that decisions made in judicial hearing cannot be overturned etc will
not wash. Or that Barristers are independent is another excuse that
does not apply here. FOR WHAT THIS BARRISTER CARRIED OUT AT WHAT WAS
ONLY A MEETING WHERE ADVICE WAS UNLAWFULLY DISHED OUT, WAS CRIMINAL
AND HE SHOULD FACE THE CONSEQUENCES AND AS HE IS THE RESPONSIBILITY
OF THE GLD (T/SOL) THEY HAVE A DUTY TO INVESTIGATE AND CARRY OUT
ACTIONS AGAINST HOBBS FOR HIS CRIMINALITY. BARRISTERS ARE NOT ABOVE
THE LAW EVEN IF THEY WERE ACTING AS AN INDEPENDENT FORCE. EVEN JUDGES
ARE NOT ABOVE THE LAW.
Of course the
Judicial Establishment simply do not want to admit to any of this,
even though it runs a coach & horses through our very rule of law
etc. How can it be said we live in a country under the rule of law
when this can happen within it? IT HAS BECOME A FACT that at every
turn, everyone I have approached including the MoJ and the GLD,
simply will not address my request for JUSTICE.
The MoJ have lied by
saying they had no ‘JURISDICTION’ over this….as you well know
as you handled my complaint about this and sided with the,
(predictably), BUT THEY GIVE THEIR GAME AWAY BY REFUSING TO EXPLAIN
WHY AND YOUR REFUSAL TO GET THEM TO DO THIS MAKES YOU AS BAD AS THEM.
Well of course it is blindingly obvious they simply DO NOT WANT THIS
EVER TO COME OUT. SO IT HAS TO BE BRUSHED UNDER THE CARPET WITH
YOUR HELP.
And there is form
for this covering up by our so called Justice departments, for the
Moj are under investigation by the police over illegal acts…..as
they covered up research about cuts to legal aid.
(Which as it
happens, means I am where I am as I’ve been made penniless and have
no access to Legal Aid.)
I obviously, after
the MoJ lies and refusal to give out answers, have gone to the GLD
and this is what I am reporting to you. For they have resorted to the
same old lies, obfuscations and denials.
I am enclosing
copies of my letters to them and their lies they sent back and how
they cynically lied again:-
Document 1. My
letter of the 11th March 2019 asking them why they have
not responded after a MONTH to my letter of the 12th
February 2019 ,when I asked them to investigate Hobbs and including
with my letter copies of 16 documents that prove my case. What I laid
out in my 12/2/19 letter is not part of this complaint as it’s not
your job the investigate unlawful matters as in this case scenario,
but to make sure that the body it was sent to, acts properly and does
not lie and cover up anything!
Document 2. Is
their short reply of the 12th March by a Kiernan Walker,
denying that Hobbs ever was an employee despite my evidence he was
and not offering any explanation as to why he wasn’t and why they
can say he wasn’t, when they supplied him to act as an Appointed
Person to the IPO. The writer also denies the GLD supplies AP’s to
the IPO, which is a blatant LIE. They also fed me misleading alleged
information trying to show they were helping me, which they were told
I’d already approached them years ago.
Document 3.
Is my email reply to Walker you can see that I am asking a list of
questions and making observations.
Document 4.
Is a reply from the GLD from a Mr Stephen Brown who is Walkers boss,
but he does not answer anything I asked and merely gives out excuses
and NO ANSWERS.
Document 5.
Is my reply email to Mr Brown asking specific questions.
Document 6.
Is Mr Browns reply: Note he fails to answer anything and makes the
LIE that the GLD do not supply to the IPO Appointed Persons.
Document 7.
is a copy of the email sent me by the IPO who confirm that the above
is a LIE
Document 8.
is my reply to the above and pointing out the truth of A/P’s as
supplied by the GLD and asking specific questions.
*** This you should
note was not replied to. Now this is a typical civil service cop out
tactic when you got them into a corner and they know to reply
TRUTHFULLY will give their game away. So they ignore that letter and
that just shows what they are up to.
Document 9.
I now have had enough of
their lies and obfuscations and send in my Formal Complaint letter
to their CEO a Jonathon Jones with enough copies of documents that
show up the lies etc. Note it is 3 pages long with 11 copies of the
documents to show him what has been going on.
Document 10.
His very short reply which is an insult to me and the gravity of what
I am exposing.
He also head it as a
“Formal Complaint about Hobbs QC”, when I was now in the process
of complaining formally about the lies etc of his employees. This is
what I have to put up with.
None of my pertinent
questions have been answered by any of the three people involved, let
alone acknowledging the documents I sent in and what they proved and
I have been fed misleading information an lies and given not one jot
of of bona-fide help in how this can and will be handled. Now either
these people including the CEO are fools and dunces or more likely
they are indulging in typical civil service skulduggery of lies and
misinformation, misleading comments and so on, hoping you will be
thick enough to be fooled by it all and will give up & go
away…….NO CHANCE.
So it is again over
to you, but are you going to indulge in the same tactics….THAT IS
THE BIG QUESTION. However it is clear that the way they have behaved
and treated me is so far below the standards I should expect from our
Justice System, let alone the very department that is supposed to
give legal advice to our government and its departments.. NO WONDER
OUR COUNTRY IS BROKEN AND DYSFUNCTIONAL AND HAS BEEN FOR ENDLESS
DECADES AND AGAIN CAN BE SEEN IN THE BREXIT SHENANIGANS AND LIES.
I look forward to
receiving your excuses and lies as you did with my complaint about
the MoJ.
Regards,
Ken Cook,
Bournemouth,
DOC 1. - MY LETTER COMPLAINING RE NO REPLY TO MY ORIGINAL FORMAL COMPLAINT LETTER WHICH CAN BE SEEN IN THE LIST OF DOCUMENTS ON OPPOSITE SIDE OF BLOG PAGE.
*********************************************************************************
The Government Legal Department,
1, Kemble St, London' WC2B 4TS.
11/3/2019.
Dear Sirs,
FORMAL COMPLAINT RE YOUR IGNORING MY COMPLAINT SENT YOU ON THE 12TH FEBRUARY 2019.
I sent you via Registered Mail a comprehensive 8 page complaint, re the unlawful actions of a Barrister, one Hobbs QC, together with copies of 16 documents (including a 47 page transcript of a meeting he officiated in, which was a bogus Appeal Hearing and which his actions he carried out, which perverted the course of justice). This was received by one of your employees who signed as `Mack'
Despite your website stating that such complaints would be dealt with within 10 working days or would at least give a reason for any delay in a response, to this date which is now about ONE MONTH ON, I HAVE BEEN IGNORED. THIS IS SIMPLY OUTRAGEOUS and one I have over
the years come to expect of our rotten so called justice system and from its civil servants within.
I made a point of asking you to return said documents along with your reply.
I now wish to complain about all this and receive a response. As no one department of yours was initially concerned, obviously my complaint was not directed to a specific department. Never the less you have no right to do nothing.
I now look forward to a response and by return seeing as I have now lost a month in time.
Yours faithfully,
K.Cook
*********************************************************************************
DOC 2.
Government Legal Department Companies,
Land Registry and Property Team,
One Kemble Street,
London WC2B 4TS
Dear Sir
RE: FORMAL COMPLAINT AGAINST MR HOBBS QC
I refer to your letter dated 10 February 2019 and I apologise for the delay in replying.
I have noted the enclosures, the originals of which are being returned to you with this letter as you requested.
I note that you have sought to use GLD's complaints procedure to complain about a decision made by Mr Hobbs QC in his capacity as Appointed Person for the purposes of an appeal from the Intellectual Property Office (IPO).
To be clear, as Mr Hobbs QC is not an employee or a `client' of GLD our complaints procedure has no application in this instance. GLD has no role in how Appeals to the Appointed Person are conducted or the actions of the Intellectual Property Office generally. GLD's role in relation to the lPO is limited to providing administrative assistance.
An Appointed Person is appointed to that role by the Judicial Appointments Commission. Any issues arising out of the conduct of an Appointed Person should be raised with the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office.
I hope that this letter clarifies the position.
Kiernan Walker
for the Treasury Solicitor.
*********************************************************************************
DOC 3. MY REPLY TO KIERNAN
To:kieman.walker@governmentlegal.gov.uk
Dear Sir,
Re your short reply letter to my complaint letter and evidence documents You have engaged in yet another whitewash exercise to brush this under the carpet and I fully expected the to happen, as it has happened at every level of complaints l've made to various justice system departments that are supposed to deal with such complaints. The capacity of the British Justice System has for lying, obfuscating and doing everything to hide its misdemeanours is astonishing and that from a system supposed to be sqeaky clean and to dispense honest justice, is astonishing and a national disgrace. You all seem to think that all we peasants out there are as thick as two short planks, so cannot see what you people are up to.
You state 'I note you complain about a decision made by Hobbe QC'. Now, either you never read my letter or looked at the evidence documents and their contents, or you are deliberately lying. For I NEVER COMPLAINED ABOUT ANY DECISION AS THERE WAS NO DECISION .. .I COMPLAINED ABOUT THE UNLAWFUL BEHAVIOUR OF HOBBS.
I INCLUDED AN OPINION DOCUMENT BY AN INDEPENDENT BARRISTER, which you either never read and have ignored, as it is inconvient for you.
You try to have it that Hobbs was not an employee of the GLD. He may not be now, but he was then an employee of the Treasury Solicitors and please do "not try it on that now some bright spark has wasted taxpayers money renaming the T/Sol, you have no jurisdiction over what the T/Sol did", I won't buy that and you have also ignored the fact that on your wesite the GLD clearly states that lawyers etc (and a barrister is a lawyer) are employees. I am sure the work Hobbs did for the T/Sol in any capacfty, he got paid for this and by the T/Sol, for who else would pay him his wags/fees ?? That in any ones world (except your world of cheats and liars) this would mean he was an EMPLOYEE. He was not then working through a Chambers.
You would have it that Hobbs is not an employee of the GLD. (This is said in the present tense) So what is he NOW, is irrelevant, because it is what he was in 2007 when he worked for the T/Sol. It thus follows that as an employee of the T/Sol they (now the GLD) are responsible for any unlawful acts he carried out in their employment.
Straight after I got and saw the transcript I complained to the T/Sol They like you, lied about everything I alleged and would have it that the actions of Hobb were sqeaky clean and above reproach and he could do what he wanted. Funny how a criminal Barrister specialist sees it otherwise but then you are not interested in that as it is inconvenient for you in your efforts to protect one of your own and cover it up Even I as a layman, know that he should have been 100% independent and certainly should not have indulged in heaps of advice giving to the crook trying to steal my IP. It is telling that they did not use the same lies as you now use. I was fobbed off and told to go to other judicial complaints bodies, just as you are doing.
However the GLD does still supply to the IPO (they have confirmed they still apply to yourselves for A/P's, with barristers and others, acting in appeals for the IPO. Again this just shows that these people you dish out to the IPO are not given out for FREE, and they must be renumerated by yourselves, thus as I've said they are EMPLOYEES as you state on your website...or is that a lie too?? Your saying you only give .Administrative Assistance- to the IPO, is yet another lie, as any A/P you put forward can hardly be described 'assistance'. IT IS A `SERVICE', like you supply to OTHER GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS AND BODIES AND THEY CAN HARDLY BE FOR FREE! Your department has to balance its books like any other.
Then you try again fob me off by saying an Appointed Person is appointed by the JAC, yet their website only deals with JUDGES. But so what, even they do 'Appoint Barristers' to be Appointed Persons' it is obvious that they are not actually EMPLOYING them!! Similarly the next fob off you try on, namely the JCIO, as they only deal with complaints about JUDGES and Hobbs was not acting as a JUDGE in that Instance. He should just have been running an Appeal Hearing but an Appeal Hearing was never heard and it was only a MEETING of the appellant + the IPO (who should not even have been there and Hobbs there as an alleged AP, all dressed up as a bone-fide Appeal Hearing, but was nothing more than a bogus hearing.
Lastly, just what position do you hold as this seems to be a secret ( YOU COULD BE ONLY THE TEABOY) This is a serious matter that I am determined WILL NOT REST. I wish it to be now dealt with by your Boss one Emma Robinson. I see from your letter heading that your department is called Companies, Land Registry and Property Team. Just how does such a department be ABLE TO DEAL WITH SUCH SERIOUS MATTERS AS ONE OF GLD's EMPLOYEE ACTING UNLAWFULLY AND CRIMINALLY AND PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE. THIS NEEDS TO BE DEALT WITH BY AN 'APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENT TO DO WITH CRIMINAL MATTERS'.
P.S You couldn't even comply with your own replying standards and get a reply sent to me within your time limits.
K.Cook.
********************************************************************************
DOC 4. THEIR REPLY.
On Monday,18 March 2019,13:34:15 GMT Stephen Brown
.
Dear Mr Cook
I refer to your e-mail of the 16 March 2019, addressed to Mr Walker. I am replying as Mr Walkers line manager and the leader of the GLD team in which Mr Walker is employed.
The nature of your original letter is unusual and as has been noted, your complaint is regarding the conduct of an Appeal by Mr Hobbs QC between 2004 and 2007. I reiterate what Mr Walker said in his earlier correspondence, ie that a barrister sitting as an Appointed Person is not employed by this office in any capacity. How the Appeal is conducted, whether by hearing or other determination, is a matter for the Appointed Person.
Although it is not clear, you appear despite this explanation to believe that Mr Hobbs QC is or was an
employee of GLD. He is not, and never was.
You papers have been returned and Mr Walker has set out the route that you would need to follow if you wish to make a complaint regarding the conduct of the Appeal to the Appointed Person. This office is not in a position to assist you further or make any other comment on the issues that you have raised.
Stephen Brown, Team Leader, Team A5, General Private Law Litigation
Litigation Division, Government Legal Department
*********************************************************************************
DOC 5 - MY REPLY TO BROWN.
Sent: 18 March 201914:02 To: Stephen Brown
Thank you for your reply.
Even though you appear to wish to obfuscate about this, I am asking you to be more open as to the EXACT situation re A/P's. You are not making clear why it is that you supply A/P's to the lP0 and you do. Is it too much for you to explain this apparent anonomoly? Are you being disingenous when you say Hobbs was never an employee of the GLD, Or because he NOW does not work for you. Also as you obviously supply Barristers as AIP's how come they are not employees of the OLD? Who pays them? Or do you do this service for free and they also never get paid when the sit in as A/P's. Hobbs who clearly came from the T/Sol at that time, how is it he was not employed (if that is what you are saying) by the T/Sol either?
I could if you are going to be awkward, ask you again thro' a FOIAct request.
You do not seem to see, that failing to be open and helpful you open yourself to one becoming very suspiscous. Seeing as the justice system has form for covering things up, Finally please explain why my request is unusual and what do you mean when you say it has been noted? I mean that sounds rather ominous likerdo you put it in a file of your, of members of the Public who are a nuisance or whatever?
So I would appreciate an answer that is more informative and helpful .... PLEASE.
K.Cook
DOC 6 - THE REPLY FROM BROWN.
RE: Z19/KJW/A5
From: Stephen Brown (Stephen.Brown@governmentlegal.gov.uk)
To: sailerboy63@yahoo.co.uk
Date: Monday,18 March 2019,14:29 GMT
Dear Mr Cook
I'm sorry if the earlier emails did not make the position clear.
To be absolutely clear:
1. GLD do not, as you suggest, supply appointed persons to the lPO;
2. GLD does employ some barristers as part of its work force. However, Mr Hobbs QC has never been employed by GLD. Just because Mr Hobbs is a barrister, it does not follow that he was ever employed by GLD.
3. Should you wish to make a complaint about Mr Hobbs, the appropriate body is the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office.
Stephen Brown, Team Leader, Team A5, General Private Law Litigation
Litigation Division, Government Legal Department
********************************************************************************
DOC 7. THE IPO CONFIRMS THIS.
RE: Appointed Persons
From: Information Centre (lpo) (lnformation@ipo.gov.uk)
To: sailerboy63@yahoo.co.uk
Date: Wednesday, 20 March 2019,15:38 GMT
Dear sir/madam,
Thank you for your reply.
Apologies for the delay in answering your query, I have spoken with a colleague in the hearings section and can confirm that we appoint members from the Government Legal Department for appeals at the Intellectual Property Office (lPO).
I hope this helps with your enquiry, if you require any further information, please do not hesitate to contact us, you may get an automated reply with any further queries as confirmation your emails have been received.
Yours sincerely
Mahdi Hussaini
Information Centre Advisor
IPO,
Concept House, I Cardiff Road, Newport, South Wales. NP10 8QQ
ww.ipo.gov.uk
*********************************************************************************
DOC 8. - MY REPLY - ASKING QUESTIONS AND NOT REPLIED TO....THIS IS USUAL AND SHOWS THEY ARE IN A CORNER.
From: ken cook (sailerboy63@yahoo.co.uk)
To: Stephen.Brown@governmentlegal.gov.uk
Date: Monday,18 March 2019,16:01 GMT
Thanks for your further reply.
However what you have said does not match up with the history that I have. You see I have in my records a letter from the Head of the lPO Tribunal Sect dated 17/7/2009 and Mr James told me that A/P's are appointed by the MOJ. Which they may have (but I doubt it as he was an arch liar) but in the hearing in 2006 Hobbs officiated at (the bogus hearing) he was put forward to do this by the 'Treasury Solictors' (now GLD) Then later on in my saga I had to also appeal before an A/P and that person was supplied by the T/Sol !!!!! and I have letters to prove that. After that I myself had to appeal a dodgy decision by the IPO and I have an email from the IPO telling me if I wanted to put in further evidence I should send it to the A/P at the T/Sol !!!
On top of all that when I saw the criminal actions of Hobbs in the transcript I complained first to the lPO and predictably got nowhere and they directed me to the T/Sol complaints proceures, which I did in 2009 and again all I got was a pack of lies etc. I have all the letters to do with that. Recently I asked the lPO who they now got A/P's from and they emailed me that it was to you-the GLD!!!
Now maybe Mr Brown, you can see why I am somewhat confused by your remarks and the history of obfuscations and outright lies over the whole history since that Hobbs meeting/Appeal (Bogus) means I TRUST NO ONE in the British Justice System. All I see again and again is lies and denials and efforts to pass the buck and deny everything.
So maybe you would like in some small way to correct that sordid history and EXPLAIN T0 ME IN DETAIL JUST WHO SUPPLIES AP'S TO THE IPO NOW AND WHO THOSE A/P'S ARE PAID/EMPLOYED BY WHO ?? Especially as 10 years ago the T/Sol did-now you-and I see that you still call yourselves the Treasury Solicitors.
Also is Hobbs still supplied, by whoever, as an A/P maybe you will still deny all knowledge of him, but maybe you will know who he works for now, if not for the GLD (You obviously know who he is as he is the top IP Barrister and Judge in the UK)
Regards,
K.Cook
**********************************************************************************
DOC 9 - MY LETTER RAISING A FORMAL COMPLAINT TO THE GLD CEO.
Jonathon Jones, CEO Government Legal Department, 1, Kemble St, London, WC2B 4TS.
25/3/19.
Dear Mr Jones,
FORMAL COMPLAINT THAT MY REQUESTS FOR ANSWERS ARE BEING FOBBED OFF BY A STEPHEN BROWN OF YOUR GENERAL LAW LITIGATION DPT AND BEING LIED TO WHOLESALE .
I am having to send you this complaint and that is if you ever actually get to read it and it's not high-jacked by one of your minions whose specific job is to waylay such letters as this from you ! ! !---because one of your departments is treating me in the exact same way that all civil servants these days seem to think they can treat we peasants in the country, with utter contempt. Presumably because you all think you can easily get away with it. And done because you all think we are thick and will not see it and will not have the ability to sort you all out.
I sincerely hope you read all this and DO NOT PASS IT DOWN T0 SOME SIMILAR MINION OF YOURS, TO AS THEY ALWAYS DO_TRASH IT WITH MORE OBFUSCATIONS AND LIES, JUST T0 BRUSH IT UNDER THE CARPET AS A COVER UP!!
I sent into the GLD a dossier of documents to show that one of your employees, a Barrister called Hobbs, committed criminal acts at an alleged Tribunal Appeal Hearing, at which he officiated as an Appointed Person, supplied by yourselves under the guise of the Treasury Solicitors. (2006) Those acts perverted the course of justice, which ruined my life and for which I have for some time now, been trying to get justice over. Long after the prescribed time limits set for you sending replies, I eventually got the predictable whitewash reply, which even in that, there were just lies made. That document can be seen in my attached documents I am including to prove what I say. It is annotated as DOCUMENT `A'
Walker said that Hobbs was not an employee of the GLD. Now he offers predictably no explanation as to why and exactly it was that the T/Sol provided his services to the Appellant/IPO. Then he says that your complaints procedure was not applicable because of this, but again makes no explanation as to exactly why it isn't As it is irrefutable that the T/Sol supplied this man and if he was never an employee, anyone with any manners would explain why he wasn't and explain EXACTLY what he was and why the T/Sol were and still are, the vehicle to supply Appointed Persons (A/P's) yet seemingly no one employs these mysterious persons, who seem to work for no one or are paid no wages and if they work for wages who pays them? And who pays them are then,- their employers ! ! I wasn't in business for 50+ years to know nowt ! !
I have some 30 plus years of trying to deal with civil servants, so I know only too well what they get up to and lying to get out of answering for their incompetence and corrupt actions, together with even actions that break the law is appallingly par for the course ! ! Lying is what goes on in order to brush it all under the carpet and I know I am dead right, as only two days ago I read in a national newspaper an article by a still serving civil servant, who exposed what civil servants get up to and
how they treat the public with utter contempt etc,etc.Well as I've said I have had first hand experience of all that and this is just the latest episode. hand
DOCUMENT 1. This is my reply to that fob off and needs no further explanations.
DOCUMENT 2. I then got a reply from a Stephen Brown, where he carries on the obfuscations you people are experts at. If ALL civil servants in this country were as good at running their departments and the country as they are at lying etc, this country would not be the basket case it is, which we all know it is, thanks to the Walkers et al, of the civil service.
DOCUMENT 3. Is my reply and perfectly reasonable request for explanations.
DOCUMENT 4. His reply which shows he is now exasperated, but he doesn't give me the explanations I asked for. How rude is that and no question I posed is EVER answered? AND he blatantly lies when he says the GLD does not supply AIP's to the IPO (See doc 7 which PROVES he is a liar)
DOCUMENT 5. I now sent him another email which true to form he ignores-hence this F/C to you. This because; are you aware that people under you are behaving like this?? Maybe you do and it's with your blessing and directions to do so ??
DOCUMENT 6. This shows how the department you are responsible for, indulges in blatant lying. DOCUMENT 7. This proves you are LIARS.
DOCUMENT 8. Shows that in 2009 the T/Sol were an arm of the MOJ (at least from my recollection of what in 2009 they said on their website about being so and from what James told me) DOCUMENT 9. Shows how I was told to go TO THE T/SOL, re me wishing to appeal another later and dodgy IPO decision ! !
DOCUMENT 10. Shows me going to the T/Sol to complain about Hobbs. DOCUMENT 11. This AGAIN shows the implications of the T/Sol in A/P's, re appeals.
DOCUMENTS 8/9/10/ AND 11 ALL RELATE TO WHAT I SAID IN DOC 5.
So you see Mr Jones, the evidence I show, proves the lies I have been fed from from your lot. All this concerns the criminal actions of a person, put forward by yourselves who you deny that being so, but without a shred of evidence, that Hobbs was not employed by you or the T/SOL. No doubt one of your excuses will be, that it is not a matter for the T/Sol/GLD re what employees or others used by you, get up to, even if they are criminal and unlawful. Given who the GLD are, I would have thought that is just one more big lie. For you are the very department that is responsible as you boast on your website, that you have a "core purpose to help the government to govern well and within the rule of law."
Yet apparently you are simply not interested when someone closely working for yourselves acts unlawfully and that leads to committing criminal offences by perverting the course of Justice !! (AND this that I allege, is backed up by the opinion of a very experienced crininal Barrister, not involved with government. ALL you and your workers can do is try to fob me off with obfuscations and outright lies ......... HOW DISGUSTING IS THAT.' ???
Even if you could show how this Hobbs bloke and all the other AP's are not employed by yourselves etc, you should at least when matters like this are brought to your attention, is act upon this and see judicial actions are started against the person concerned after a thorough INVESTIGATION and seeing the EVIDENCE. Or telling me how I can get JUSTICE without me having to pay to do that. And not give me a load of guff that means in real life, isn't worth a light and are roads I went down years ago, to only receive the same old fob offs and lies. It is simply the old boy network at work AGAIN, in that all you Establishment Justice Johnnies, all stick together to protect each other and KEEP THE RUDDY BAYING PEASANTS AT BAY
If I had the money I would have taken this bastard to the High Court in 2007, but having had my business ruined by him and other civil servants, they knew I had no money to do that. You had better pray I don't win the lottery ! ! Because criminal acts have no time limit. My Father was a Colonial Police Inspector on CID for 15 years, his Father and brother both in the UK Police and I was in the RAF Police. So I'm not that ignorant on the law and being a Marine and Auto engineer since the RAF, with my own businesses since 1965, I am no fool either and VERY meticulous. So you should chew on all that and the only way you are going to get rid of me is to send a hit squad around to bump me off . Because up to now I am in very good health and this will go on until I DIE !
I LOOK FORWARD TO SEEING WHAT LIES AND EXCUSES YOU COME UP WITH AND I IF YOU DO NOTHING, I CAN FEEL IN MY WATER, A DEDICATED BLOG COMING UP --DEDICATED TO THE THE CORRUPT WAYS OF THE GLD ETC. AS IT IS, ALL THE CORRESPONDENCE ANI) FACTS ARE APPEARING AS WE GO ALONG, ON MY GENERAL BLOG ON CORRUPT CIVIL SERVANTS.
Yours Truly,
Ken Cook,
*********************************************************************************
DOC 10. - THE SHORT REPLY FROM A FELLOW QC TO HOBBS-SO NO WONDER WHY HE WILL NOT DO A THING AGAINST 'ONE OF THE LADS' !! JUDGING BY HIS LETTER HEADING, HE WILL BE FULL OF HIMSELF. !!
Jonathan Jones QC (Hon)
Pemanent Secretary
HM Procurator General & Treasury Solicito
One Kemble Street London WC284TS
thetreasurysolicitor@governmentlegal.gov.uk
1 April 2019,
Formal Complaint about Mr Hobbs QC
I am writing in response to your letter dated 25 March 2019. I note that you wish to complain about Mr Hobbs QC.
You appear to believe that Mr Hobbs QC is or was an employee of GLD, or that GLD are or were responsible for `supplying' Appointed Persons to the IPO. As both Mr Walker and Mr Brown have explained to you, this is not correct. There is therefore no basis for your complaint against GLD.
If you remain unhappy about the handling of your complaint, you may wish to consider an approach to the Pariiamentary Commissioner for Administration (the Ombudsman) who investigates complaints made by members of the public about government departments and other public bodies. To do this, you will need to make your complaint in writing to an MP who can refer it to the Ombudsman, with your consent, with a request that an investigation be conducted.
JONATHAN JONES
******For those of you who are Eagle Eyed, you may notice that JJ deliberately ignored and/or refused to reply to the following questions I asked him:- ******
1. No apology for all the excuses and lies put out by his employees/staff.
2. No explanations to the questions I asked re: Why Hobbs was/is, not an employee of the
GLD/T/Sol?
3. Why does the GLD offer A/P's to the IPO if they are not employees of the GLD?
3. Who actually does employ A/P's and pay them?
4. Why did he ignore all 11 documents I sent in to back all that I was saying/alleging,
let alone answering or even denying what I was saying/showing?
5. Why was it that he did not out of respect and curtesy, tell me what law department would deal
with the actions of Hobbs QC, given that his employees fed me eroneous info on this ?
BY ACTING THE WAY HE DID AS THE CEO OF ONE OF THE UK'S MOST IMPORTANAT LAW DEPARTMENTS, HE SURELY DID NOT COVER HIMSELF IN GLORY OR SHOW THAT THE GLD IS A TOP RUN DEPARTMENT THAT TREATS ANY MEMEBER OF THE UK PUBLIC WITH RESPECT.
No comments:
Post a Comment