Despite it now being 5 months since I last posted, I have not been resting. Actually those months I have been more active than normal, with me sending off more emails of enquiry and attempting to get my useless MP, Poshboy Tobais Ellwood to do his job. That is to represent his constituents and HELP THEM when they are being ridden roughshod over their rights by his government departments.
But of course this parasite is only interested in one thing and that is riding ever more higher up the greasy pole of politics. During this past 5 months he's been never off TV news programmes and in newspapers, giving we peasants evidence of his prime intelligence on all manner of subjects. Mind you I was very happy when Boris kicked him out of his cushy job as a Junior Minister in the MOD.
However I now see he's wangled his way into another cushy job running some committee. As the chairman where he can practise being the bully he is. It is the Common Defence Select Committee.
How he conned himself onto that cushy number.? But more to the point what the hell makes him fit to run that.? For all he was a Captain and they are ten a penny as its only the second rung up his ladder to power and fame. You automatically get to Captain after a couple of years in the Army
What does he really know about Defence and ALL matters to do with that AND on a World scene??
Let us face it and be honest.....what are the Green Jackets when they are out? They were just a foot sloggers mob and you don't need to be Einstein to get into their regiment. When I was in the RAF
we used to call army blokes PONGOES and held them generally in contempt. The nickname was so and meant "Where the Army goes, the pong goes" Self explanatory and applies to our arch brown noser Tobias the poshboy Ellwood.
But when it comes to actually representing one of his constituents who is being trashed by one of his governments departments, he has done EXACTLY the same as he did the last time in 2017 when I asked him to look after the interests of a constituent. Namely approach the Dorset Police and ask them why they did virtually nothing when one of their PC's 'perverted the course of justice'.
Forward to the current problem, I knew that he would repeat his lack of interest in representing one of his constituents, if I again approached him. However I wanted to be able to show the World that that would be indeed, how he would react to any request I made to him. So I asked that he approach the Government Legal Department and the Ministry of Justice and ask both why they were refusing (in effect) to investigate the criminal actions of Hobbs QC at that bogus IPO Appeal Hearing and crooked meeting (in 2006) he had with my ex agent and when he gave him a couple of hours of free legal advice. (all to be seen further back in this blog) For this is what I had asked these two bunches of corrupt bodies of civil servants (MoJ + GLD) to do. However as you will have seen, I had got nowhere in my efforts there and I'd reached the point where I now needed to test him again. You can see at what point I was at, by reading the previous post.
Now having been a member of the Army for 5 years, he boasts on his website about this and also boasts that because of his Forces time he now likes to look after veterans. I wrote to him telling him I had this problem with the GLD and MOJ and would he agree to approach them if I got nowhere with them. He said he would, so after I got to the point where both departments were lying through their back teeth and refusing to deal with Hobbs and investigate his criminal acts ( I had sent them the transcript to show what he'd done, plus my barristers opinion on that and a brief description of the case) The MoJ said they had no jurisdiction to investigate and the GLD had said they had never employed Hobbs let alone put him forward as an Appointed Person to hear the alleged Appeal Hearing....and this despite me supplying them with a copy of the email from the IPO which confirmed they had supplied Hobbs to them for that bogus hearing.
I pointed all this out to Tobias in emails, which is harder to get across than had I been allowed by 'His Majesty Tobias' to meet with him and verbally go over it all and with the documentary evidence. I had in several letters to Tobias and as briefly as I could, laid out the facts around that bogus hearing and supplied him with a copy of the transcript plus a copy of the barristers opinion. Tobias never even acknowledged receipt and had not asked me any questions about any of the facts. I know that no one could read all that I had given him AND NOT HAVE QUESTIONS THAT HE WOULD HAVE WANTED CLEARING UP. So I was convinced that he had not read anything much, if at all.
Eventually his office girl Elizabeth Mahon told me, but only after I had asked her, that Tobias had sent to Buckland MP the Minister for Justice, a copy of something I had supplied him with. Had Tobias been a competent MP he would have told me what he had actually given to Buckland and in fact he should have given him the transcript, the Barristers opinion letter and my explanation letter. So as he didn't do that I had NO IDEA WHAT BUCKLAND WAS LOOKING AT. This was brought home to me when I was eventually given a copy of Bucklands reply to Tobias and I was very angry when I took that in. For his letter showed me that either he had not been given much at all by Tobias and had merely contacted the MoJ and asked them what they could tell him about any contacts I'd had with them. Which of course what they gave him was just a load of made up lies. I will put onto this post, copies of all this so you can see what I am on about.
I was also told that Tobias had asked the GLD for their comments but they were waiting for their reply. I sent this Elizabeth several emails over a number of months asking her 32 questions that she never answered. In fact I sent her three emails which she completely ignored. It became apparent that in fact, both she and Ellwood were just going through the motions of helping me, but were in actual fact conning me.
You will see all this that went on from the end of September to recently. For on the 10th Jan 2020 when I sent Tobias an email complaining that after 9 months he had got nowhere, that Buckland had erroneously stated in his letter a load of nonsense and that the GLD had lied through their back teeth.
He replied a few days later by sending me the letter I ALWAYS KNEW HE WOULD SEND. For he had over the previous 9 months had predictably done nothing IN REAL TERMS, because all he had done was pretend he was pushing for anwers. Now I had him against the wall and he could not now go on with his pretence. But the cheeky lying bastard still tries it on by saying he had tried to help.
When all he had done was to act once again as a mere postman, instead of fronting the MoJ and Buckland, the guy who runs our so called Justice System and the GLD Boss a Mr Jonathon Jones and to ask why they were refusing to act and give up ANSWERS as to their failing to deal with my requests and most of all why they were lying all the time.
Well it is all there at the end of this post, as there are ALL the emails and letters for you to see. I have now replied to the Buckland letter (on the 11th Feb) and explained how it bears no relation to what I had asked be investigated. I doubt if it will be answered and even if it is all I will get is more lying excuses. Mark my words. It will go on this blog if I ever get a reply.
1/9/19.
Dear Mr Ellwood,
Further to my letter to you of the 30th ]uly. 2019. ~ I included in that letter to you, the documents I had to send to the Parliamentary Ombudsman. Let me explain to you why I found it necessary to be trying to complain to them about the actions of the Government Legal Department and the MOJ. This explanation will not be short.
As I outlined in my letter to you; since 2008/9 I have been trying to obtain justice because of the unlawful actions committed by Hobbs QC in a bogus and alleged `Appeal Hearing' held in 2006 in London. Hobbs did not hold this alleged appeal hearing as a bona-fide appeal hearing, but as nothing more than a cosy meeting between him and my ex business agent, so he could give him 46 pages of legal advice as to how he could circumvem the previous decision made by Hearing Officer Landau and which went against him. That meant I had won and my long battle against my theiving ex agent should have been over.
But NO, my long held suspicious that the IPO had an agenda to divest me of my legally held Trade Mark of VIPER, was further enhanced when they gave my ex agent (Busbridge) an appeal. You must know that to get an appeal one has to have bona-fide facts and reasons and not just saying you did not like the decision, so you wish to appeal .... THAT IS LEGAL FACT! ! (Check that with your wife ! !) He gave absolutely no legal reasons in his statement, yet the IPO gave him an appeal. ! ! This further told me that IPO had an agenda against me.
You should also take note of the fact that I had to fight a TEN YEAR LEGAL BATTLE AGAINST NO LESS THAN CHRYSLER, the third largest car manufacturer of that time, as they wished to register this T/M for themselves. They had the money and top I/P lawyers, yet I WON and thus got the Trade Mark I had been using for at least ten years. I was so busy with my car business which was surging ahead, that I had not registered it. On the onset of that action against Chrysler my ex agent tried to sell my Viper trade mark to Chrysler for £1/2M and that shows what a thief and criminal he was and is. (I had common law rights to it even before it became registered and he had no rights to it) It became quickly apparent that the IPO did not like the fact I had won, and that was born out by statements they made and actions they took during my continuing battle with Busbridge, who was clearly aided by the IPO from 2002 to 2010. As he acted as a witness for Chrysler, the IPO know full well what he was up to and the lies he was coming out with, yet they allowed him to start an action to register the trade mark, minutes after they gave me registration.
By 2002 I was out of money to fight Busbridge and the IPO, and that was because Busbridge was able to make copies of my car (he also stole my chassis design as well as the body shape) and use my Trade Mark since 1992, thus drastically cutting my sales and my profits. Everything I had built up was being strangled, as was my long held wish to be able to put aside monies for my impending retirement when 65.
Had the bogus hearing not been held, the downfall of my business would not have happened and I could have built it up again to its former high position in the Kit Car world. (Before the original compnay BRL was closed to get rid of my Yank investors and I started up a new company on my own. How successful BRL was is easily seen in my reams of documentary and video evidence, as are the export orders for millions of pounds in value}. So it is that bogus hearing that proved to be the tipping point for my new business and the ruination of my life. You should try and understand that my business should and could have made enough profits to see me into my old age and be very comfortable too and I would not have been the burden on the taxpayer as I have been since 2002, when I had a heart attack over the stress I suffered to that date. I am attaching the transcript of that bogus hearing and the legal opinion I got on the unlawful acts that took place in it. You will on that transcript, be able to read my notes in the outer columns and they show the unlawful goings on, in it.
I am quite sure that you will be of the opinion that all this is a legal matter and it should be the courts that deal with it. Thinking that, would be a `get out' for you to do nothing. However you, if you felt like that, you would be committing the same lack of understanding and indeed the cynical making up of excuses that I have been consistendy dealt, from every judicial body that I've approached for justice, since 2008/9. (See attached list) So I want you to now understand EXACTLY what I am trying to do as of NOW and what I am asking you to do. That is to point out to you that it is the cynical unlawful behaviour of Hobbs QC at that bogus hearing which went on to pervert the course of justice for me. How I cannot get justice as I have no money to take it to court and all my attempts to get the judicial bodies that exist to act against one of their own, were blocked.
You I am sure, will know that perverting the course of justice is a `CRIMINAL ACT' Had Hobbs not done what he did, I would have continued to use the T/M that I had successfully proved was mine to own via registration. That is why what he did, perverted the course of justice as my T/M was cynically taken away from me and WITH ABSOLUTELY NO EXPLANTION AS TO WHY THE IPO DID THAT AND UNDER WHAT LAW GAVE THEM THE RIGHT T0 DO IT? However I know that the whole judicial system in this country and the Establishment, would absolutely hate to have one of their kind up in court on such changes. Hence why they have all blocked all of my attempts to get justice with a litany of excuses, outright lies and the twisting of the facts and my evidence. (which is ALL IN IRREFUTABLE DOCUMENTARY FORM-AND ALL IGNORED)
How can a poor member of the British public take a high up QC to court?? Firstly as I have already said- NO LEGAL AID except for criminals and immigrants. The Police (Dorset and Met) earlier on when I went to them about earlier criminal acts by Busbridge in all the evidence he gave in 6 different tribunal hearings, behaved as they always do nowadays. They dismissed my evidence saying it was not criminal and I should take it to court myself, This after they had connived and hobnobbed with the IPO. (ALL provable) They also were extremely aggressive and threatening. So if I went to them over this QC, I WOULD GET NOWHERE. So I have had to conduct all my efforts to bring Hobbs QC to justice, by myself. They all apparently think I am just a uneducated peasant that they can walk all over. They picked the wrong person, as I am not thick and have the brains to carry on this fight as I am doing, to this stage and will continue as long as I have to.
When Hobbs QC acted at that bogus hearing, he acted as an `Appointed Person' as Busbridge had asked for it to be heard by an `Independent' person, which is what Hobbs should have been. Busbridge because he'd lost the previous hearing probably thought that the IPO were not Independent. Now this is fact:- `Independent Appointed Persons' are supplied to the IPO by the Treasury Solicitors. (now also known as `The Government Legal Department') Also as Busbridge was appealing against an action made by the IPO,(the hearing that he lost) any bona-fide appeal hearing would have NOT HAVE HAD ANY IPO MEMBER ANYWHERE NEAR IT ! ! Yet at this bogus hearing an IPO Law Officer Manager by the name of James, was present- WHY?? You will see he connived with Hobbs and that was highly irregular and indeed cynically unlawful.
When the Transcript is read it is very apparent to every a non law person, that this was not being run as an appeal hearing. I have had appeal bearings and know full well what is discussed and gone over at a bona-fide hearing. This means that Hobbs should have gone into all the reasons that Busbridge gave for having his appeal upheld. You will not see any such discussions doing just that. No, what you will see is a sea of never ending advice being given to Busbridge, lasting 46 pages and probably up to two hours in duration, as to how he can get out of the legal spot he now was in. He is actually told exactly what to do and how to do it and that James and the IPO would HELP HIM. IT IS OUTRAGEOUS, not only that, but it's arrogant to be thinking they could get away with it. You will also see evidence that Hobbs had clear anti Cook ideas and about my winning against Chrysler. His outrageous and illegal statements on that give the game away, but then Hobbs knew I had no power and he had all the power he needed to squash any complaints made by me. So how could I win against the likes of him, as he knew his Establishment mates would get behind him and protect him if I was stupid enough to fight his actions?
In that he was dead right as I've said already. I am sick of hearing Politicians and people in the Justice system pontificating on TV and in newspapers, especially now over this nonsense going on about Brexit, stating we live in a democraey that lives under the rule of law. Yet what has been done to me, means a coach and horses has been driven right through our so called Justice System. For when a Barrister QC (who can also act as a Judge) does what Hobbs did, where is the rule of law, there??? For the law was broken by him on at least 13 times, including perverting the course of justice. For in 2010 after the IPO had indeed made sure in 3 subsquuent bearings after that 2006 bogus hearing, that they all went Busbridges way. in the last one, held in 2010, their last act, was to illegally take away my legally registered T/M, telling me "it would be as if I'd never had owned it" ! !
That Hearing Officer also said that the IPO had made mistakes, but he never said what they were or when they were made. I presume that what he meant is that the IPO made a mistake in letting me win over Chrysler. However that means that both my legal team representing me and my case AND all the top lawyers acting for Chrysler, had all fallen down on their jobs as had the IPO Hearing Officer.So the IPO were now making good on their incompetence and putting things right. HOW LAWFUL IS THIS??
At that 2010 hearing I was legally represented by an IP lawyer, paid for by my son and he said he was astounded by what had gone on at that hearing and how the IPO could think they could get away with it. He wanted me to appeal to the High Court, but that was not possible as I had no money to do so.
So you see as I have said, the tipping point in the sordid history that has ruined me, was that bogus set up and alleged appeal hearing. The explanation as to why they set it up is no doubt thus: The 2004 hearing which was brought about by Busbridge applying to register the Trade Mark `Viper' which was already lawfully registered to me, so I was obliged to oppose it. However the IPO despite all my documentary evidence backing my opposition AND showing that Busbridge had committed over 200 acts of outright perjury and five acts of forgery in all his witness statements for that hearing, they did nothing about the perjury/forgery and clearly sided with Busbridge and allowed him to register HIS OPPOSITION TO MY T/M. Thus there were now TWO businesses who had registration of the same Mark ..... highly irregular and eventually made my business untenable.
However I went on to very strongly complain that Hearing Officer Reynolds, in that hearing, deliberately allowed into evidence, claims (especially of alleged transfers of who owned the trade mark to others) that were clearly not true and they had been concocted by Busbridge. Hence the IPO clearly felt obliged to have the whole hearing looked at by another Hearing Officer named, Landau.That is clearly very unusual. Landau decreed that Busbridge had no right to the T/M and clearly I had won and the CEO of the IPO said so.Yet the IPO then clearly did not wish things to rest. They knew that I and Busbridge had represented ourselves. That meant that as they wished to thwart me and to wrest my T/M from me, they had to give Busbridge legal advice as to how he could with their help, turn the tables on me.
They could not risk giving him WRITTEN advice in case I got my hands on that. So even though he could show no legal bona-fide reasons to appeal, they obviously decided to give him an appeal and to keep me away from that bogus hearing, so I would not be able to see what they were going to be up to. As you will see in the transcript they gave him all the advice they thought he would need AND it is CLEARLY OBVIOUS they were giving him advice ....... which is highly ILLEGAL and in itself-PERVERTS THE COURSE OF JUSTICE! !
One of the repeated and lying excuses made by all the justice departments I've gone to, including the GLD and the MOJ is that they could not question the decision in a legal case. YET HOBBS ADVISED BUSBRIDGE T0 DROP THE APPEAL AND NO DECISION WAS EVER MADE. I have that in writing more than once, so there WAS NO APPEAL AND NO DECISION MADE, yet all the liars in the Justice System keep using that lie to get out of doing anything re my complaints.
I then approached the MOJ to get them to investigate Hobbs and that bogus meeting and the criminal acts he carried out. Astoundingly they-the top department of all our justice departments and one would think are responsible to the whole of the UK Justice System, used the excuse that they have no jurisdiction and presumably over criminal acts ..... WHAT LIARS.
I was forced to then go right to the government legal department that supplied Hobbs to the IPO. They denied they supplied Appointed Persons to the IPO, even though I showed them the letter I had from the IPO saying they went to the T/Solicitors to get A/P's! ! They denied, despite all the evidence I have and that shows they are heavily involved in all the appeals against IPO decisions that require A/P's to hear them. What they do is all on the record and that the IPO even pay A/P's, so how independent does that make the A/P, of the IPO??? Naturally I made complaints about both the GLD and the MOJ to the Parliamentary Ombudsman although I knew them to be as devious as the GLD/MOJ. True to form they have done nothing but lie through their back teeth as to why there is nothing wrong with what either department have said. Of course I have all the documentary evidence of what I've said to both and what they have replied with-ALL THEIR LIES. You have seen both my complaints as they had to be sent via yourself.
WHAT ALL THIS BOILS DOWN TO IS THAT THE JUSTICE ESTABLISHMENT SIMPLY DO NOT WISH TO HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH ALL THIS, TO BE HEAVILY INVESTIGATED AND EXPOSED. HOWEVER YOU HAVE THE POWERS TO GO IN AND ASK QUESTIONS AND ASK THAT ALL IS INVESTIGATED-INCLUDING THE CRIMINAL ACTIONS OF HOBBS. HOWEVER AS I SAID IN MY LETTER OF THE 30TH JULY TO ELLWOOD MP, TO DO SO WILL TAKE GUTS. For any MP would be taking on the might of the Justice Establishment and all their undoubted power. Are you willing to do that for a constituent????? Are you willing to have your copybook blemished???
"I therefore ask you to let me know if you will take all this on for me, an ex serviceman THAT YOU SAY YOU ALSO REPRESENT, and you intimated you were willing to approach the MOJ and you would also have to approach the GLD. I am telling you they will lie through their teeth and will tell you they have done nothing wrong etc, etc and no doubt you will feel you have to believe all they say. I know how all these people work, having had to deal with them and many other government departments, since 1992. As far as I am concerned nearly all civil servants are incompetent and consumate liars, who will never admit to any wrong doings.
If you truly are willing to take this on, I will have to show you all the documentary evidence in addition to what I an attaching to this email and aliswer any questions you should have to ask me".
Best Regards. Ken Cook.
*************************
The following letter is what Ellwood sent the Justice Minister....not exactly a face to face meeting where Ellwood could and should have been asking him why his MoJ was in effect, refusing to act and investigate what looked like a Barrister employed by them, committing criminal acts. No, all he does is POST an inconclusive letter and that is not taking up a case on behalf of one of his constituents. When he gets the reply, had he read all of my above letter, he would straight away see that Buckland isn't addressing the facts of my complaint at all and is referring to things that are nothing to do with it.
To:
Robert Buckland QC MP
Lord Chancellor and Seoretary of State for Justice Ministry of Justice
102 Petty France London SWI H 9AJ
20 September 2019
Mr Ken Cook,
Our Ref: TE10176
I am writing in relation to the above named constituent who has been in contact with me regarding his correspondence with the Ministry of Justice,
As you will see from the attached document, Mr Cooks case has a significant amount of history to it, but in essence, he believes that the Ministry of Justice should be investigating his case in which he believes a Barrister has committed unlawful and criminal actions, and that this was aided by the lntellectual Property Office.
Mr Cook has previously brought his case to the Ministry of Justice but has been told that this is not a case for the Ministry to deal with, therefore he has also taken his case to the Parliamenfary Ombudsman as per the advice given to him.
My constituent is not satisfied with the dealings he had with the Ministry of Justice and the explanations given to him regarding the dismissal of his case, therefore I am seeking an explanation as to why the Ministry of Justice has no jurisdiction over this case, in order that I can best advise my constituent.
Thank you in advance for you assistance with this.
Yours ever,
***** Why say this (the highlighted words) and exactly what did poshboy actually give him? Well I gave him heaps of evidence which it is obvious he NEVER gave this Buckland fellow. So why was this?? No wonder the reply from Buckland never dealt with ANYTHING that was in those evidence documents. WHAT A SHOWER THESE PARASITICAL OAFS ARE!!!!!! ****
The following are copies of emails sent to Ellwood and his replies. Most will be self explanatory.
You will see how I am being messed around and having questions unanswered and getting nowhere.
Then in the end he knows he will have to now jack it in and get rid of me, as he simply will not answer anything and what excuse can he give as to why I am not getting answers and action on ANY front.
From: ken cook (sailerboy63@yahoo.co.uk)
To: elizabeth.mahon@parliament.uk
Date: Monday, 30 September 2019,16:30 BST
Hi,
I have been going through all the letters and emails between us. I can see that it is now TWO MONTHS (30th July) since I asked Tobias to act against the Parliamentary Ombudsman, the GLD and the MOJ. I can also see that all he has done is ask the MOJ why they say they have no jurisdiction etc, when also you should have asked why they refuse to investigate Hobbs. I can see that you say you have approached the P/Ombudsman and asked why I haven't received an answer. I pointed out to you that that was entirely wrong and why. Yet you have not responded to that and nor have you picked up from my facts given you that you should have asked them is why they sided with the MoJ and took no action against them? This because they said the MoJ said they had no jurisdiction but gave no reasons why and certainly did not advise me WHO COULD INVESTIGATE HOBBS QC and what he did. Similarly it is the same over the GLD as they failed to act against them
Then you made no mention of you asking the GLD why they lied and refused to answer my three questions or investigate Hobbs or giving me advice as to how I could get an investigation started.
You did inform me that you had asked Robert Buckland to seek answers re the MOJ failings. But you gave no date for doing that or re the Ombudsman. Nor have you asked them why they seem to ignore the facts that Hobbs acts need to be investigated, (His criminal acts, not some minor acts that can be investigated internally) I look forward to all the lies they will come out with, but you should be prepared for them. So I now show you again why they should investigate Hobbs. He worked for the GLD (Treasury Solicitors) or through them and at that time the GLD openly on their website stated they were an 'arm' of the MOJ and that makes sense for surely the MOJ cover ALL of the justice system departments in the UK. Plus what he did was criminal and so either they should instigate an investigation or they should ask the Met to do so) It definitely should not be the case that they say I SHOULD ask the Met as I did ask them to investigate criminal acts that happened that were allied and connected with this case and they refused (as they always do these days) Nor should I be told I should take legal action myself as I have no money to do so and how would I do that? ln any case as it is clearly a Police matter OR THE MOJ HAVE MEANS TO INVESTIGATE?? All this has been said to you in various emails and all this has already been pointed out to you in my email of the 20th Sept which you seem to have not taken in or commented on .... at all.
Then you failed to come out with any remarks to my email of the 13 Sept in which I suggested that in order for Tobias to get all the facts re this sordid case, he could view my .Youtube video. That would be 100% better than any face to face surgery, between us. For in the past his surgery was too short a meeting and a bit like a Doctors, of only 10 minutes. My case would need a meeting of no time limit in order to cover all the facts.
Then you have also completely ignored what I said about you saying I had abused Tobias. Your remarks on that subject AND the fact you say that your decision is FINAL is against all the rules that government departments have to work to. The Public have the right to be able to appeal such matters. This case is a judicial matters case and under the HRA section 6, I am entitled to be treated FAIRLY, In any case your acting like this cannot be anything other than unfair.
Regards,
Ken Cook
THIS EMAIL WAS TOTALLY IGNORED AND UNANSWERED !!
THE FOLLOWING EMAIL IS WHAT I GOT FROM BUCKLAND AND YOU WILL SEE HOW IT FAILS TO DEAL WITH MY REQUEST THAT HOBBS BE INVESTIGATED.
The Right Honourable Robert Buckland QC MP
Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice.
HIP ref: TE10176 HOJ ref: MC72844
October 2019
COURT CASE
Thank you for your letter of 20 September on behalf of your constituent, regarding his concerns about his court case.
I am sorry to read of how pursuing this case has affected Mr Cook's health. I realise he is unhappy with the handling of his case and raises concern about the conduct of a barrister and court staff at the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court based at the Royal Courts Of Justice.
I hope you will understand that I cannot comment on individual cases, as decisions are taken by the independent judiciary. It is important I do nothing that could be seen to undermine this independence Where a party believes that the law has not been correctly applied, the correct process is to appeal the decision. I appreciate Mr Cook believes that he has not had a fair hearing and that his trademark was taken away unlawfully but I cannot review his case or the judge's decision.
Neville Collins from HM Courts and Tribunals Service!s (HMCTS) Customer Investigations Team wrote to Mr Cook on 12 February 2018 in reply to his letter to former Secretary of State. the Rt Hon David Gauke MP. Mr Collins explained that decisions made by the tribunal can be appealed to the appointed person who is a senior intellectual property lawyer appointed by the Ministry Of Justice at the High Court, or by appealing directly to the High Court. Given the time that has now passed, Mr Cook may also need to ask for permission to appeal the order. More information about how to do this can be found at www.gov.uk/guidance/trade-mark-disputes-resolution-hearings
I realise Mr Cook has concerns about the conduct of court staff and the barrister who was involved in the case. Although Mr Cook mentions that he has taken his case to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO}, my officials have not been able to locate receiving a complaint from him about the conduct of court staff. HMCTS operates a complaints procedure. This allows the court or tribunal where the problem has occurred to investigate and put things right. Mr Cook can make a complaint directly to the court who will consider his concerns and write to him with the outcome Of their investigations, They will also provide him with details of how he can escalate his complaint to the next stage if he remains dissatisfied. HMCTS' complaints procedure must be exhausted before the PHSO will look at his concerns.
lf Mr Cook has not done so already` then he may be able to complain about the barrister to the Bar Standards Board. More information about what they do and how to complain can be found at: www.barstandardsboard.org.uk.
As explained by Mr Collins, The Chartered Institute of Trade Mark Attorneys (www.citma.org.uk) and Chartered Institute Of Patent Attorneys (www.citpa.org.uk) may be able to help Mr Cook contact other legal advisors who specialise in this area of law. I appreciate Mr Cook is concerned at the cost of legal advice to appeal to the High Court. These institutes may be aware of advocates who would be willing to offer a pro bone service whereby Mr Cook does not pay for the advice and representation.
I hope my reply explains why I cannot review Mr Cook's case and he understands the reasons why
I hope it also explains how he may be able to get help to pursue his case and complaints if he wants to.
RT HON ROBERT BUCKLAND QC MP
**************************************************************************
From: ken cook (sailerboy63@yahoo.co.uk)
To: elizabeth.mahon@parliament.uk
Date Thursday,10 October 2019
Thank you for sending me the letter.(Bucklands letter) However I have to say that this reply letter is the EPITOMY of what I have had to put up with for many years. It is a typical reply which shows that the person writing did not understand EXACTLY what I was writing and complaining about, OR they did and have indulged in a reply that typically and deliberately misread what I have said. This in order to trash my efforts to get JUSTICE. I am not blaming Buckland as he has just gone to an arm of the MOJ, namely the Courts and Tribunals Service and given them the documents that it seems Tobias has forwarded to him. Now I wrote several long letters to Tobias, namely on the 30th July,1st Sept, and 20th Sept giving him the background to my complaint. This was so he could understand how I got to the point where I had to resort to coming to him, as I had got nowhere. I did not give him those background letters just for him to pass onto the very people I had in the past, used to try to get somewhere and just got nowhere. Plus I had asked him ONLY to approach the MOJ and the GLD to ask why they had refused to act. The MOJ saying they had no jurisdiction and the GLD refusing to answer three simple questions.
What I am trying to do now, after having tried all the other avenues and got nowhere with all of them lying and deliberately twisting the facts, so they could use excuses to do nothing, is to find out who exactly was responsible for employing this Barrister at that time in question. Then to approach them asking them to investigate the criminal actions of that Barrister, and that is why I approached the MOJ and then the GLD and got the same old lies and excuses, hence my coming to Tobias after the Parl-Ombudsman protected them .... as is usual for that shower.
I could go paragraph by paragraph and destroy everythingthat Buckland has said. What he did say was fed him him by Collins no doubt and that devious civil servant did the same to me last year when I wrote to Gauke when he was Justice Minister. I could show Tobias the letter he sent me, it was exactly the same old bunch of lies that he has given Buckland. I will not do that as it would take too long and would no doubt do your head in. In any case, it is irrelevant as what I had asked Tobias to do as I've said, is only to ask the MOJ and the GLD, the questions l'd outlined.
Now I have to ask this: Has Tobias actually read the full history as given him?? IE the transcript I sent him plus the legal opinion on that, that I also sent, along with a long.description of the background and all sent in the email of the 3rd Sept. Quite a lot to take in, but essential if he is to understand what actually went on. Now you see, I know that Tobias will not have understood all I sent him and that is why I need to have a face to face with him so he can ask questions and I can reply to them. But all this is not anything to do with all that Buckland has said in that letter of his, BUT IT IS TO DO WITH THE CRIMINAL ACTIONS OF HOBBS QC IN A MEETING, NOT ANY COURT CASE HEARING OR EVEN ANY TRIBUNAL HEARING.
You see, as I have already said, the UK Justice System simply does not want to admit that what went on at that MEETING was 'illegal and criminal'. Can you imagine what their reaction would be if a UK National Newspaper had headlines:-UK top Barrister commits criminal actions that perverted the course of Justice' No they will do anything to prevent that and I wonder if any member of Parliament would do the came. This is what I am trying to find out. At this moment I am, as I've said, just trying to find out who was responsible for this QC. Then I can go to them and DEMAND that they investigate and if they don't I will expose them, as well as asking Tobias to do something which I know any MP can do as I have seen good MP's do exactly that for their constituents.
So my question is; Am I going to be able to talk with Tobias or am I going to be refused again and put in a postion that, I seem to be talking to a BRICK WALL. For you have not asked any questions that I have directly asked you recently and that shows that you are not dealing with this situation. That shows me that contrary to what you told me, that you can deal with this case etc, etc, that is incorrect. In any case the subject matter as I have said in long and involved and I am quite sure you have not read it all or even if you have, have you understood it all? That should mean that you would ask me questions so you could understand 100%. But that has'nt happened ..... has it? So I am thinking you are not fully dealing with this and I am quite sure Tobias hasn't read everything or understood what is really going on.
SO I WOULD BE GRATEFUL IF YOU WOULD ANSWER MY MY QUERIES AND POINTS
NO ANSWER TO ANY OF THE ABOVE...TOTALLY IGNORED AND PAR FOR THE COURSE
Re my case
From: ken cook (sailerboy63@yahoo.co.uk}
To: megan.gittoes@parliament.uk
Date: Sunday, 20 October 2019,17:59 BST
https://mail.ychoo.com/d/folders/30
Both you and Liz have said in the past you will help me. However you passed me onto Liz and I over the past few weeks have sent her several emails in which I have asked questions, yet have received NO ANSWERS TO THEM. That does not please me at all, since you said you would help me. Lizz forwarded a copy of the reply from Buckland QC. Yet I told Liz that what he said had nothing to do with what l'd asked Tobias to look into, namely why did the Parliamentary Ombudsman do nothing when I asked it to look into why the MOJ did nothing` Also why did the GLD refuse to answer a few simple questions.
Previously I had written to Mrs May (Remember, she was then the PM) outlining the whole of my case and telling her that I was being refused JUSTICE. She or her staff, merely fobbed it all off by sending my letter of request to the HM Courts (quite why, as they had nothing to do with anything re my complaint) So the letter a bloke called Collins from that department and was about what I was sent by Guake (the Justice Minister for 5 minutes) in 2018, and contained endless nonsense that had absolutely nothing to do with the original letter sent to Mrs May (who had one of her minions pass it onto Guake). As I have told you, I sent him a stiff letter in reply to his rubbish points and as is normal I got no reply, So Buckland has done some sniffing around and has come up with all that, but it positively has nothing to do with what I asked Tobias to look into...DO YOU FOLLOW ALL THAT ??
MAYBE LIZ HAS FAILED TO ANSWER MY QUESTIONS AS SHE THINKS THAT THAT LETTER YOU ALL GOT FROM BUCKLAND, PUTS AN END TO IT ALL, SO GOOD BYE MR COOK-CASE SOLVED AND FINISHED !! ABSOLUTELY NOT THE CASE.
The Buckland letter and the Collins letter are symptomatic of what I have had to put up with for years now.
Incompetent government departments that have messed me about for years now, plus some civil servants who have DELIBERATELY said they could do nothing, because they could not intervene or comment on what went on in a COURT CASE .......when I was never involved in one ! They are either damn stupid or they have deliberately misread all that I have said in order to reach a decision whereby they had a excuse to get rid of me and my request that I should receive an investigation into the deliberate actions of Hobbs QC, designed to pervert the course of justice and divest me of my Intellectual Property, which then had the effect of ruining my business, my health and life etc.
So my question is this: Are you going to stand by your PROMISE to see that I get justice via the help of my MP????????? I WOULD LIKE ANSWER SOONER RATHER THAN LATER AS ALL THAT HAS HAPPENED TO DATE IS NOTHING.
Regards,
Ken Cook.
From: elizabeth.mahon@parliament.uk
To: sailerboy63@yahoo.co.uk
Date: Tuesday, 22 October 2019,16:45 BST
https://mail.yal]oo.com/d/folders/30
Dear Mr Cook,
I understand you have been in contact with Megan regarding your case.
I would like to give you an update. Tobias has written to the GLD and explained to them that you would like to know why they will not investigate your case. Of course we will let you know once we have received a response from them. We allow 20 working days before chasing for a response if we have not received one by then. This is due to the volume Of comespondence they receive.
You have received the position of the Ministry of justice. |
Regarding the decision of the Parliamentary Ombudsman. I do understand that you believe they have made an incorrect decision. Their decision is final and their is no automatic right to a review. If you think that they have made the wrong decision then it is for you to go back to the caseworker who handled your case and show: -
What you think they got wrong in reaching their decision. -
Why you think this would make a difference to their decision. -
What you would like them to do to resolve your complaint they have not already done. It is for your caseworker to look into this.
Kind regards,
Lizzy Mahon
** This email just highlights what this Bizzy Lizzy bird is all about, as is Tobias.
It also once again, shows that none of them have read any of the long descriptions I have given them as to what my case and complaints are about. Had they done so they would not be making the remarks about what I should do re the Parliamentary Ombudsman failing to do anything and how they like all the other government departments, just misrepresent your case facts-all in order to lie and fob you off. *******
** Note she completely ignores what I said in my email to Gittoes**
From: ken cook (sailerboy63@yahoo.co.uk)
To: elizabeth.mahon@parliament.uk
Date: Wednesday, 23 October 2019,16:56 BST
Hi,
Thank you for your reply. However I feel that you are not dealing with the questions I have asked since started in September,I asked you a number of questions re the Parliamentary Ombudsman, the GLDand MOJ.
The fact is that you have not answered most of the questions I have asked you in my emails of 20th Sept/30th Sept/10th Oct/ 2Oth Oct and this despite my pointing this out to you several times.
The question I asked Tobias to get an answer on from the MOJ has not been answered despite you telling me it has-in the letter to Tobias, that Buckland sent him.
The question I asked Tobias to get an answer on re the GLD has not been answered at all.
The question I asked re the Parliamentary Ombudsman has also not been answered and this despite you telling me in your email that on the one hand their decision is final, yet then you say I should go back to the case worker etc. This is tantamount to you thinking I am stupid and did not know that I should do all that you stated. I DID ALL YOU STATED AND GOT NOWHERE AS USUAL. HENCE WHY I ASKED TOBIAS TO ASK THEM QUESTIONS AS TO THEIR ACTIONS.
The Parl/Oms are a racket as they are set up to never actually carry out honest investigations that complainants bring to them. I have experienced this with them on every case I have sent them. IT IS A FACT THAT EVEN THE PRESS HAVE WRIITEN ABOUT AND I BELIEVE ONLY 3% EVER GET AN HONEST OUTCOME. It is outrageous that even when you show them that they have either not understood the facts of your complaint, they just shut you up by saying case closed-it's final...GO AWAY. Tobias should understand this and be asking them why they think they can do this in order to shut down somone and the complaint against a government department. They absolutely failed to get any answer from the GLD or the MOJ and I complained and got nowhere--THAT IS WHY I WAS FORCED TO HAVE TO COME TO TOBIAS !!!
The same is happening with you because I am sending you emails in which I state what it is all about that I wish Tobias to investigate and I am forced to have to deal with a third party by emails, instead of me having a meeting face to face with Tobias when I could get across to him all the facts and how he could help, He would be able to ask me questions on those facts and in the end I would be able to know that he fully understood all that I would have been able to tell him. I know from much experience that trying to get across to a civil servant important facts is absolutely hopeless-by emails or letters. No doubt you are overloaded with work so that you simply do not take the time to READ ALL that I have sent you and Tobias. It ends up being a quick skim read and most of it does not get read or fully understood. That cannot happen in a proper meeting face to face, But of course I am a BANNED person to do this because I had the temerity to complain strongl;y to Tobias because he had utterly failed to stand up for me in a very important case. AND SO I AM NOW SEEING A SIMILAR SITUATION IN THIS CASE. TOBIAS SHOULD BE INTO THIS CASE OF A HIGH' UP BARRISTER PERVERTING TO COURSE OF JUSTICE -BY A CRIMINAL ACT. OR IS IT ANOTHER CASE OF A MEMBER OF THE ESTABLISHMENT (TOBIAS) BEING RELUCTANT TO ACT AGAINST ONE OF HIS OWN??
I cannot beleive that in such an important case, where a barrister no less, has driven a coach and horses right through our justice system and made a mockery of it and so far, because I have no money to take him to court, rather than trying to get civil servants to do this or my MP and give me justice, he is getting away with it. WHAT IS IT GOING TO BE?? Are you going to answer all of the questions you have ignored in all the previous emails?? I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW. IS TOBIAS GOING TO STAND UP FOR ME??
Regards,
Ken Cook.
From: Tobias Ellwood (tobias.ellwood,mp@parliament.uk)
To: sailerboy63@yahoo.co.uk
Date: Wednesday, 30 October 2019,15:34 GMT
Dear Mr Cook,
Thank you for your email, I understand you are not satisfied with how we have tried to assist you. `
Firstly, I would like to assure you that every action that Tobias has taken regarding your case has been taken with nothing but good faith with his sole aim being to assist you.
Tobias wrote to the Ministry Of Justice and asked them, on your behalf, why they would not investigate your case. You have specifically said that Tobias should have asked why they refuse to investigate, which is why he has taken this action.
Regarding the Parliamentary Ombudsman, we have advised you that there is a reason why cases are taken to them which is to get a final decision on whether or not a government department has acted appropriately. The Parliamentary Ombudsman decided that they could see no evidence that anything went seriously wrong when the GLD addressed your complaint. I appreciate that you have already read this for ourself and disagree and as you know, you must go back to the Caseworker from the Parliamentary Ombudsman to address this with him.
Regarding the GLD, we are currently waiting from a response from them. Tobias has asked them whv they will not investigate.
Tobias' role regarding his constituents is to support and advise them were possible. He does not have the authority or capacity to force any person or department undertake actions solely at his request.
I also understand that you still wish to meet with Tobias. The decision has been made that we are not Happy for you to have a surgery appointment wth Tobias and the reasoning for this has been made very clear to you. Our decision on this will not change. I would encourage you to email any further information which you would like Tobias to see, if you believe there is anything else.
I will of course come back to you as soon as we have received a response from the GLD.
Kind regards,
Lizzy
Lizzy Mahon
Parliamentary Assistant Office Of Rt, Hon.Tobias Ellwood -MP
******************** NOTE This wretched lying woman has no qualms saying what she has (I've underlined her lies) It is quite obvious that both her and Tobias had no intention of helping me........ only to pretend they were. Similarly when she lies that an MP has no authority etc, when it is common knowledge that a caring MP can and do ask departments awkward questions regarding their lack of actions etc. I see this in the media and see MP's getting up in Parliament and bringing up subjects where their constituents are being trashed by some gov-department department. As far as Ellwood is concerned he and his staff are quite happy to lie through their back teeth about what he can do.*******************
LET US BE CLEAR HERE..TOBIAS DOES NOT WANT TO STICK HIS NECK OUT AND GET ANY SORT OF BAD REPUTATION FOR ASKING AWKWARD QUESTIONS ETC
From: ken cook (sailerboy63@yahoo.co.uk)
To: elizabeth,mahon@parliament.uk
Date: Thursday, 31 October 2019,10:13 GMT
Thank you for that, There are errors in it, but due to what has now happened in Parliament with an election now going to happen, I believe it will be a waste of my time to reply and show the many times I have not had questions answered and so on. I mean you and your office and Tobias may not even be in existence after the election. Tobias isn't exactly loved in Bournemouth and if he isn't re-elected, well there you go. Both he and his office will have more to do up to the election, so I will leave it. Or course if you ever do get replies from the Parl Oms and the MOJ I would expect you to pass them on.
However there is one question you could give me an answer on. That is, in your email to me on the 20th Sept you said Tobias had asked Buckland to ask the MOJ, why they said they had no jurisdiction to investigate what Hobbs QC had done. Now I did ask you straight away, at what date that was and you have never answered that. I would like to know now. Similarly in the same email you said Tobias had asked the Parl Ombudsman for an update, Again I asked at what date did he ask and you have also never answered. I need to know that too.
On both of those questions he asked-it is well over any days requirement they should have to answer and you did say it is 20 days. So why no answers from them both?
I would be obliged to receive an answer to those two questions, in case I have to deal with someone else after the election. If not you will again hear from me with a list of questions. Have a nice time re the election.
Regards,
Ken Cook.
NOTE the above was never answered to...AS USUAL AND IT AGAIN SHOWS POSHBOY TOBIAS AND HIS EQUALLY BAD MANNERED OFFICE GIRL - GIVE NO COMMENTS OR ANSWERS. THIS IS WHAT I'M UP AGAINST AS YOU WILL SEE AHEAD.
****Note due to the pending election I did not push for answers to all the questions I had asked to be answered and I would again approach them after it.*****
*******IF YOU THOROUGHLY READ THE FOLLOWING EMAILS...YOU WILL SEE HOW WHEN I'VE BACKED THEM INTO A CORNER, THEY REACT BY REFUSING TO CARRY ON WITH THEIR PRETENCE OF 'HELPING ME' AND REQUIRE THAT I DISAPPEAR
From: ken cook
To: "MAHON, Elizabeth"
Subject: A history of not answering my questions:
Plus numerous other failures. You have obviously thought that Buckland had answered my questions re the MOJ and my answer to you on the 10th Oct, seems to have gone right over your head as you made no comments on what I had said about his reply. Also he never answered my question, which Tobias also asked MOJ and that was. 'why did they say they had no jurisdiction" this to ask a barrister about his Criminal acts AND INVESTIGATE ALL THAT? Now you must have read all the letters and documents I sent Tobias on the 307/19 ??. He made no comments on anything and that raises the question of: 'did he read any of it' and most importantly of all, did he understand what had been done to me? Most MP's would acknowledge receipt and make their comments of what was in any documents and their etc. Also most MP's would when they have contacted as in this case, a government department, they would send me a copy of the letter the MP had sent that department. Certainly Mr Chope MP, did. I definitely need to see what Tobias has asked, so I can be fully aware that the RIGHT questions were asked and if they were wrong questions, I could then correct that. That did not happen and despite me asking you several times: what date did he send that? you never gave an answer.
Similarly you have said that Tobias has contacted the GLD, but again, no copy of the letter and all that has happened is 'Silence' from them. The time that has elapsed since then, should mean you chasing them.
I am not going to go over every email I have sent you to pick out all the questions I have asked you, which you have for whatever reason, not answered, despite all your assurances of helping me etc. So far, going on what evidence I have, all Tobias has done is act like a postman. This is what he has always done. He never gets into the facts and evidence given him, by getting back to you and meeting you to go over all the facts and evidence AND telling you what and how he can help. You have commented that he cannot 'investigate' I would take issue with that as I have seen many MP's investigate cases of wrong doing brought to them. Not just sending the culprit department a copy of the constituents letter and saying 'Give me an answer on that'. If he is fully boned up on ALL of the evidence in that case, when he gets an answer he will know all the lies and non answers and every
trick in the book being carried out. Then he has the authority to question all that ..... I've seen it done. But then it is only done by decent MP's who give a fig about their constituents, especially when they are poor and cannot fight the whole of the UK Justice System covering up their corrupt actions, as I am trying to do. So far I am not seeing any of that and its now some months and I am nowhere.
Forget the Ombudsman and what happened to me with them. They as I've said are utterly useless and I know they will NEVER admit to anything and they are anyway, not central to what js really going on. It would be nice if YOU went over every email I've sent and pick out the questions l've asked ..... AND ANSWER THEM.
I've picked up this case again, as what is going on with the election and Brexit, it seems that Tobias may be re-elected. That means that his office and you will in the weeks ahead, be still be operating. I know that means you may be very busy. However please do what you can.
Regards,
Ken Cook.
***************THIS TRUE TO FORM WAS NEVER ANSWERED*********************
From: ken cook Sent: 3 January 2020 17:29
To: MAHON, Elizabeth
Subject: Ref Case TE10176
Fwd to Tobias Eltwood MP.
When I last contacted you I said that due to the election I would leave it until that was over. So here I am back to you in the New Year and with Tobias again ensconced in his constituency that I live in.
I got in contact with Tobias last year around April time` I reminded him that on his website he states that a he is ex Forces he specialises in Veterans' so I being a Vet myself, I would expect him to keep to his claim. Since then you have claimed that I in the past had abused Mr Eltwood, but you have not shown evidence that I have and only showed a letter I sent him years ago, COMPLAINING that in a important case where a PC had perverted the course of Justice and he had failed to do anything about that.
ln this case which is even graver that the Police case, I have supplied to Tobias`several letters where I have laid out what in this case has gone on and I how I expect him to be able help me and to keep to his promises about how he helps Vets, and how. He has not made any comments; say, acknowledging receipt of same letters or making any requests to supply extra evidence and comments etc from me. Very odd. You have merely stated that some time ago he had indeed approached the MOJ and the GLD. I pointed out to you that normally an MP would send a copy of such letters, but I was not sent any. You ignored my comments on that. You have pointedly not made any comment on the fact that they have seemingly also ignored you. Or maybe they have spoken with you and told you a pack Of lies about me and the case facts` And that obviously has to be covered over by you and you both sit on 'non replying' action, hoping I will go away`
So here I am months later (9 at least) and I am no nearer to being helped by you or T.E. The letter you gave me some time gao from a Mr Buckland was not a reply from the MoJ or the GLD and I told you why, yet no comment from you. This is all repeating how Tobias and his office failed me then, firstly over a P.Constable perverting the course of justice and nothing happening about that - hence my frustrated letter of complaint, you and he have taken indignant offence to and are using it to again deny me help, this time around?
My question now is, what are you/Tobias going to do if anything, about the fact that as I told you, both the GLD and the MOJ are refusing to investigate one of their own, namely a QC. Plus ignoring yourselves. Are you and they just going to refuse to say or do anything, in the. hope I will go away? All this in the knowledge that they know I am skint, because of them and their actions, so they also know I cannot escalate this all to the High Court.
However I know that Tobias could easily take all this up, face to face wth the Justice Minister. He is also able to bring it to the attention of Parliament and ask in the house why a QC is able to dodge justice in the way he has and over a very important point. Which is 'Do we in the UK have a truly clean justice system as is boasted about all the time, or can members of the justice system gct away with perverting the course of justice, with impunity' ?
In the run up to the election Boris boasted this: "Judges are the great glories of the Constitution" (HOBBS QC sits as a Judge) I had a good laugh at that, because this is what we are always being brainwashed about, with lies. For the UK Justice System is thoroughly corrupt throughout and I have endless documentary evidence of that fact.
Due to the election I have lost time again, so I now would ask you to kindly furnish me with answers to all of the above and as soon as possible.
Kind Regards,
Ken Cook.
***************NO ANSWERS OR COMMENTS-AS USUAL ******************
From: Elizabeth.mahon@ parliament.uk (elizabeth.mahon@ parliament.uk)
To: sailerboy63@yahoo.co.uk
Date: Tuesday, 7 January 2020,15:10 GMT
Dear Mr Cook,
As per your request, (of 3/1/20) please find attached the original letter Tobias sent to the Ministry of Justice and their response, and also the response from the GLD. Below is the original email sent to the GLD.
Tobias has written to the departments/people you have asked him to contact regarding your case, and this has now all been sent to you.
As you will see, the GLD state that Mr Hobbs QC was not an employee of GLD nor was he supplied by them to the IPO.
As you know, the recommendation of the Robert Buckland QC, the Secretary of State for Justice, was if you wish to complain about the conduct of court staff, you should complain directly to the court, if you have not done so already. You can also complain about the barrister to the Bar Standards Board. I apologise if you have already taken these steps and I am not aware.
Kind regards,
Lizzy
Lizzy Nahon
Parliamentary Assistant Office of Rt` Hon.
**This email just shows you very clearly that this woman and Tobias have not read any of the copies of evidence I have sent them !! WHAT A KICK IN THE TEETH THAT IS !!
For what she is saying is that despite me covering all of the comments she makes. this shows how she has just again supplied me with the alleged comments of the MoJ and the GLD which simply do not deal with the complaints I made to them both. They are merely repeating their lies in those alleged replies and Tobias should have been asking why they have lied. This is especially seen in what she says about the letter Buckland sent, for I made my comments on that to her some time ago and showed that what he was saying had nothing to do with my original complaint about their refusal to investigate Hobbs.
Also I had shown the letter the IPO sent me that clearly said the GLD did supply them with Appointed Persons.
Here is copy of the letter Tobias sent to the GLD :-
I have been contacted by the above named constituent who has been in contact with me regarding a complaint he has about a 'top IP barrister'.
I have attached some of the correspondence I have received from Mr Cook on this matter. Mr Cook has requested that I ask you why the GLD will not investigate this case.
I would appreciate it if you could please get back to me on this in order that I can best advise my constituent.
Kind regards,
Tobias
Rt. Hon. Tobias Ellwood Member Of Parliament for Boumemouth East
*********************************************************************************
************NOTE THAT HE REALLY PUT HIMSELF OUT IN THIS SHORT LETTER.
HE MUST HAVE TIRED HIMSELF NO END.....BUT IT SHOWS THAT HE ISN'T MAKING ANY EFFORT TO GET REAL ANSWERS TO ALL THE POINTS AND QUESTIONS I HAD ASKED ABOUT THE MOJ FAILING ME. PLUS EXACTLY WHAT LETTERS OF MINE DID HE SEND THEM??? ANY DECENT MP WOULD HAVE TOLD ME THIS. OF COURSE HE IS ONLY GOING THROUGH THE MOTIONS. AND IT MUST BE NOTED THAT THE GLD IGNORED THIS LETTER AND NEVER GAVE HIM NOR ME ANY ANSWERS OTHER THAN TO CLAIM THEY HAD ALREADY ANSWERED THEM. IF YOU LOOK AT THE BACK COPIES IN THIS BLOG YOU WILL SEE THEY SIMPLY REFUSE TO ANSWER MY QUESTIONS AS TO WHO EMPLOYED HOBBS....THEY JUST SAID THEY DID NOT EMPLOY HIM-NOR DID THEY SAY WHO DID AND THEY POINT BLANK STATED THEY HAVE NEVER SUPPLIED APPOINTED PERSONS TO THE IPO AND THIS DESPITE THE EMAIL FROM THE IPO TO ME WHICH CLEARLY STATED THE IPO GOT A/P's FROM THE GLD.
THIS IS THE EXACT KIND OF LIES AND DESPICABLE BEHAVIOUR OF THE MOJ AND THE GLD WHO ARE BOTH UP TO THIER NECKS IN LIES AND CORRUPTNESS.
*******************************************************************************
From: ken cook (sailerboy63@yahoo.co.uk)
To: elizabeth.mahon@parliament.uk
Date: Friday,10January 2020,17:21 GMT
As I feared unfortunately your answer fails to deal with what I have asked you to do for me. Once again all this is down to you and Ellwood refusing to meet with me and to take whatever time needs be, to go over all the FACTS of what I have asked to GLD and the MOJ to investigate. That way I would be able to show Tobias all the documents and whatever replies I got to each one, and then to show Tobias how non of my questions and claims were dealt with. Show all the lies, obfuscations, the twisting of the facts to show that my facts were all wrong and so on. All that done in typical civil service ways in order to rubbish everything I claim and accuse the perpetrater, one Hobbs QC of doing.
By sending you the documentary evidence mostly on emails, I am unable to ascertain if whoever read them (you or Tobias) actually did read all of them and did UNDERSTAND all the FACTS. I have to spend as I am now, time to write out more email replies, collate more documents to show you and then wait for you to reply ..... only to see that you make no mention of the evidence l've sent, let alone understood it all. Then I have to do as I am doing now ..... have another go at getting you to understand/answer a few questions ( mostly they are all ignored as I have told you ad nauseum) and so on. I first approached Tobias in April LAST YEAR ......... and here I am absolutely no further on!! All this despite you telling me more than once, that both you and Tobias wish to help me. I will put together all the documents you will need to see and with my comments and explanations. These will show you just what the GLD and then the MOJ have been up to, so you then cannot claim you never understood the facts.
I will also comment on the two copies of Tobias's letters to the MOJ and the GLD that are incorrectly worded and thus have given the recipients an incorrect impression of EXACTLY what I am complaining about. I have already sent you an email reply re the Buckland reply, which was on behalf of the MOJ, given you a full explanation as to the rubbish he came out with. You ignored that and that was months ago. Now I have to repeat myself, thus more time wasted.
So I will do that over the next few days and will send them to you via recorded delivery, (so you cannot say you never got them) Plus I have to say that I am nearly at the end of the road with Tobias Ellwood and if this latest effort I am making, is blocked once again, by seemingly you not understanding the FACTS and once more I get fobbed off, I will be taking it all to a place that if I am successful, you will positively hate the outcome, It will show that I, like so many members of the British Public, we cannot get our MP's to take up cases where the British Justice System and all those in it (The Establishment) just wish to kick it all under the carpet. Knowing that because they have now denied almost all people, Legal Aid, that effectively means we cannot get it into court let alone get JUSTICE. But even if we could, this case is one where a Barrister QC who is also a Judge, so I cannot believe they would not all stand behind him and cover up for his crimes as has been happening to me all along in my quest to get departments who are responsible for this man to act. (This has happened just this week, where a British Judge let off another Judge who had committed crimes. Plus our laughable and utterly useless Police will not touch this with a barge pole and are in any case, too thick to understand the facts.)
Regards,
Ken Cook.
****************************************
The following is the inevitable reply I got from His Majesty Tobias the greasy pole climber par excellence Ellwood. MP.
THE RT. HON. TOBIAS ELLWOOD MP
HOUSE OF COMMONS LONDON SWIA 0AA
Mr Ken Cook
14 January 2020
lt is with regret that I have decided I must write to you to end our communication from here on out due to the recent threatening communication you have sent towards my staff.
Over the past few years my office has received rude and threatening emails from you on several occasions and you have previously had to be reminded of my zero tolerance policy towards threatening and abusive language.
I and my staff have tried to assist you as we do with all constituents, however I am afraid we have now reached a point where we can longer cooperate
Regards ** Note-the underlining is his !!
1st note is:- HE STATES SEVERAL OCCASIONS HE HAS RECEIVED RUDE AND THREATENING EMAILS. SO HE IS PREPARED LIKE HIS FELLOW CIVIL SERVANTS TO LIE. AS EVEN WHEN I HAVE ASKED HIM TO SEND ME COPIES OF THESE EMAILS...NONE HAVE BEEN FORTHCOMING. Well they are all in this blog in recent posts so you can see for yourself what a damn liar he is. I suppose this is what all those Public Schools teach their Brats.... How to be excellent shysters and liars in order to get to the top !!
2nd Note...He says that he or his staff have on several occasions, previously, had to remind me of his zero policy etc, etc. THIS IS AN OUTRIGHT LIE AS ONLY ONCE HAS HE DONE THAT AND THAT SO CALLED EMAIL IS THERE FOR YOU TO SEE FOR YOURSELF.
3RD NOTE:- You should read my last letter sent on the 10th January 2020. (ABOVE) It is to the point but I do not think any honest person could say that I have been ABUSIVE OR THREATENING AND DEFINITELY NO SWEARING. This is exactly the type of thing now that ALL employees of the State, no matter what department we deal with, is what they use to get rid of you when you absolutely refuse to give in to their lies and every dirty tactic they use to not actually deal with whatever it is you are complaining about. When you get them with their backs to the wall and they know you have them by the curlies, they accuse you of swearing/abusing them and so on. IT MAKES MY BLOOD BOIL BECAUSE THESE UTTER BASTARDS ARE PAID BY THE TAXPAYERS TO SERVE US AND WHAT DO WE GET FROM THEM ??? AND IF YOU DARE TO COMPLAIN AND SHOW YOU WILL NOT BACK DOWN TO THEIR DISGUSTING LIES AND TACTICS, THIS IS WHAT THEY RESORT TO...AND THEY GENERALLY GET AWAY WITH IT.
I SHOULD POINT OUT TO YOU WHEN IN APRIL LAST WHEN I DECIDED TO TRY TO GET POSHBOY ELLWOOD TO TAKE ALL THIS UP, I KNEW WHAT THE OUTCOME WOULD BE. FOR TWICE SINCE THE WRETCH WANGLED HIS WAY INTO PARLIAMENT - NO DOUBT WITH HELP FROM FELLOW ESTABLISHMENT JOHNNIES SOME IN THE TORY PARTY WHO PARACHUTED HIM INTO A SAFE CONSTITUENCY. (MAYBE LIKE DADDY ETC) HE HAS CARRIED OUT EXACTLY THE SAME BEHAVIOUR. WHERE HE ABSOLUTELY DOES NOTHING FOR HIS CONSTITUENTS-SO THAT IS WHY I WENT AHEAD WITH THIS FRUITLESS EXERCISE, AS I WANTED HIM TO BEHAVE AS I KNEW HE WOULD.....AND HE DIDN'T LET ME DOWN AND AS I DESPISE THE POSH UPPER CLASS BASTARDS IN OUR ESTABLISHMENT... LIKE HIM, WHO PROLIFERATE IN PARLIAMENT, I DECIDED THAT IF I COULD LAST OUT HEALTHWISE, UNTIL THE EXCERISE WAS FINISHED, THEN I COULD EXPOSE IT ALL....IT WAS WORTH CARRYING OUT. HAPPILY I AM STILL IN QUITE GOOD NICK SO STILL AROUND AND HAVE OODLES OF SPARE TIME FOR DOING THIS- IT KEEPS MY BRAIN IN TRIM. MIND YOU I AM NOT FINISHED YET AS THERE ARE CERTAIN MORE AVENUES I HAVE YET TO GO DOWN,TO EXPOSE IT FURTHER !!!!!!!!
*******************************************************************************
THE FOLLOWING IS A COPY OF THE LETTER THAT I HAVE BEEN FORCED TO HAVE TO SEND TO BUCKLAND, SEEING THAT ELLWOOD HAS THROWN THE TOWEL IN. BUT WILL HE EVEN GET IT, LET ALONE REPLY TO IT, LET ALONE ADDRESS THE THINGS IN IT??
Robert Buckland MP,
Secretary of State for Justice,
Ministry of Justice,
102, Petty France,
London, SWIH 9AJ.
12/2/2010.
Dear Mr Buckland,
CRIMINAL ACTIONS PERPETRATED BY BARRISTER HOBBS QC, WHILST ACTING
AS AN APPOINTED PERSON AT A BOGUS IPO APPEAL HEARING.
I am being forced to send you this letter because the letter you sent me via Tobias Ellwood my MP, dated the 7th October 201, showed me that either Mr Ellwood fed you information that was totally incorrect, or more likely, someone in the MOJ has deliberately fed you a dortored account in order to get you to write a reply, to fob me off. Mr Ellwood knew what the correct facts were, as I gave him documents showing them all-A TRANSCRIPT AND A BARRISTERS OPINION DOCUMENT ON ALL THE UNLAWFUL ACTS COMMITTED BY HOBBS PLUS A BRIEF RUNDOWN ON THE RELEVANT FACTS. For what you have said bears absolutely no relation to the true facts. I am determined that you will see the true facts, so at this stage I will just comment on the inaccuracies of all that you said in your letter. If you tell me that you will investigate what the MOJ and the GLD have failed to do, plus the acts of Hobbs, I will send you the full facts and copies of the backing, irrefutable documentary evidence.
After wasting 9 months of my time during which E]lwood in effect achieved nothing, he has seen fit to engineer excuses to now tell me that he refuses to handle my requests for answers, despite initial promises he would. This by accusing me of abusing and threatening him, but he has not supplied me with any evidence of this, despite my asking for that.
I would hope that you, especially after recent remarks you have made to newspapers about the justice system in the UK, will have the decency to look into my complaints. For all the departments that you are responsible for have over the years since 2010, denied me JUSTICE, again and again, by lying on a grand scale. Their behaviour and willingness to brush serious criminal behaviour by one of their own, under the carpet, is absolutely outrageous. I am determined to expose all this if you carry on the sane way. What has happened to me has driven a coach and horses right through the UK Justice System and makes a mockery of off repeated statements like those made by you and other politicians. Like the recent one made by a Tory MP that we in the UK have the best Justice System in the world- what a sick joke. Today it is an absolute shambles as you well know and because of what it has been done to me, I now know it-is full of corruption too.
I will now, paragraph by paragraph, comment on all the statements you made in that letter that bore no relationship to the complaint I had made to the GLD and the MOJ, starting at the end of 2018. I have numbered the paragraphs so you can easily identify my comments. The first mistake you made is in the heading - "COURT CASE", because there was NO COURT CASE and you repeated that mistake in Para 1 by saying "about his 'court case."- I did not have a court case !!!
Para 2. You say "He is unhappy with the handling of his case" and "court staff at the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court based at the Royal Courts of Justice"
THE TRUE FACTS: All my complaints have been about what went on at an alleged Tribunal Hearing held in the IPO's London Office situated in Bouverie St and in 2006. Even though what was supposed to be discussed at this `alleged' Appeal, concerned a Trade Mark registered to me. The `alleged appeal' was brought about by my ex London business agent and was officiated by a barrister (Hobbs QC) acting as an `Appointed Person'. He was supplied by the Treasury Solicitors/GLD (who deny they supply A/P's to the IPO-one of many lies confirming this fact) You must note that I was refused attendance at this hearing even though it discussed matters that were about a Trade Mark registered to me ! That was unlawful, as was what the IPO did, after the event.
Para 3. The whole of this paragraph is totally inapplicable, because no appeal hearing actually took place as IT WAS DROPPED !! So no decision of any sort for you to comment on, nor any decision I could appeal! ! ! (which in any case, would one be able to appeal a decision made in an alleged hearing, one never took part in???) My Trade Mark was eventually taken from me in 2010 (unlawfully) and what went on at this bogus appeal hearing was responsible for that eventuality. Thus making it a `pivotal point' in my battle for justice. I call the hearing, bogus, as what it was IN FACT, was no more than a cosy meeting between my ex agent, Hobbs QC and Mr James, a law officer from the IPO, where they discussed how Busbridge, my ex agent, could circumvent a previous hearing (By a Mr Landau) which went against him and this meant I had won that hearing. The transcript of that bogus appeal hearing shows that Hobbs unlawfully gave Busbridge legal advice (46 pages of it) as to how he could circumvent that judgement that went against him. And he made scathing remarks about me when I was not in a position to defend myself. THIS IS ALL UNLAWFUL.
Para 4. The whole of this paragraph is yet another is a prime example of the unmitigated chicanery and blatant lies that I've had to endure coming from from EVERY justice department I've been forced to have to turn to. The whole of Mr Collins letter is a farrago of lies and he constantly makes statements he knows are lies. He had the true facts, because I had given the true facts to Mr Guake. Once again he knew TIHERE HAD BEEN NO DECISION and he knew that I had no money to take anything to any Court, especially the HIGH COURT. Hence why I wrote to Mrs May and then to Mr Gauke. I replied to Mr Collins dreadful letter, full of garbage and lies, with none of it remotely to do with what I had complained about. I completely demolished his letter by stating all the mistakes that amounted to deliberate lies and I gave him the true facts. Needless to say Mr Collins did not even reply, hence why I wrote to Mrs May and then to Mr Gauke.
Para 5. Given what I have told you above, it is clear that all that you said in this paragraph is simply inapplicable and is so far from what actually happened that I wonder how you could have written it. You haven't seen that I only went to the PHSO AFTER the MOJ had acted in exactly the same way as every justice department and manager within them had, that I had gone to. This by lying, twisting the facts to read a different story, passing the buck onto yet another department, sweeping it under the carpet as they don't ever want this to see the light of day. In effect treating me like I was an idiot that couldn't see what they were up to. Which was and is; to get rid of my request to investigate the criminal acts of one of their own. It is as bad as the Police investigating the Police or solicitors investigating themselves and so on. Are you going to carry on this cover up ?
Paras 6 & 7 These show again, that either you were never given all the documents containing the FACTS or you chose to ignore them. For I had, in the documents given to Tobias Ellwood, explained that since 2007 I had gone to EVERY entity in the justice system with my case and my complaints and given the TRUE FACTS and this obviously has taken years to do, due to how slow every one is. So it follows that all the suggestions you gave for me to take note of, had long ago already been done. Of course all the outcomes have been the same. Namely outright refusals to look into the case, denials that they were the correct people to approach, lies on a monumental scale and so on. All that OBVIOUSLY took years and meant that in the end I had to approach the GLD, the MOJ, and various Ministers including the PM Mrs May, but the outcomes were always the same. Brush it under the carpet, deny everything as he's probably too stupid to know what to do and hope he will eventually give up and go away. They picked the wrong person to do this to.
Well I am not stupid, but an intelligent man of 79 who has seen more of the World and business, as an engineer, than most have. So you can take it that I am not going to be fobbed off and WILL get this exposed one way or another, if it is not dealt with. Hobbs QC who has a very high reputation in his field, but what he did puts all that and UK Justice into disrepute AND SHOWS TIHE LEVEL 0F CORRUPTION THAT IS WITHIN IT. You are the last entity on my list, so I look forward to seeing that at least there is someone within the UK Justice world who is honest ..... for a change and you can prove this by stating your willingness to see that what Hobbs QC did, is investigated and he gets what he's due for his criminality. To remind you there is no time limit on investigating criminal acts...this is used as yet another excuse. If you tell me this is what you will do I will then provide you with copies of all the irrefutable documentary evidence, as I've already said.
Yours faithfully,
Ken Cook
********************************************************************************
21/2/20.
PS..This letter was sent via 'Signed For' mail so I know it was received yet 10 days on - not even an acknowledgement that it has been received and will be dealt with in due course.
SO THE QUESTION IS WHAT ARE THE BETS IT WILL BE IGNORED???
