CORRUPT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE. 97.

Because of having to spend much time in the confines of my flat, I decided to spend some of that time looking at certain aspects of how the IPO illegally and criminally took away the registered Trade Mark 'Viper' from me and for some unknown reason gave it to a crook, who had been my agent for my sports car kit- which from early 1986 I had called 'Viper'. I manufactured this car in kit form and fully built, from Jan 1986 to 2002. 

In this blog you will see the full story of how that agent in 1991, when he heard Chrysler were attempting to register that Trade Mark, had offered to sell them the T/M for a cool £500,000 posing as the legal owner of that Mark. Also by this time he had decided not to continue being my agent but to steal my chassis designs and the Trade Mark name and copy the kit and car and sell the copies himself. So he obviously told Chrysler he owned the T/M, knowing full well he did not and that is termed; making an application in 'bad faith' and we used this fact again and again to the IPO and at the last  hearing held in 2010-only to be ignored.

Now the fact is, that I owned it (unregistered until I won against Chrysler in 2002) the trade mark was well known in the kit car trade and is also well documented in many magazines with endless adverts and write-ups it was also featured in videos about Cobras in the UK and was also featured on BBC and ITV news, when we secured a multi-million pound order for a 100 cars a year to Japan. A replica of an Aston Marton Volante car was featured on Top Gear (Read the recently out book: 'Snakes Alive- the cream of British Cobra replicas in the 80's ' by Peter Filby who is a well known Kit Car expert and author who ran the kit car magazine 'Which Kit' for many years, where the history of my company and car featured prominently) Yet Chrysler still attempted to register the T/M and I had to oppose them. Eventually they failed and I won registration, but for some reason the IPO I now know, thought I should not have won. But strangely enough they never said they thought this at the time and right up to 2010. But as you will see in this blog, from 2002 immediately after they had to give me registration, after I got rid of Chrysler, they embarked on their crooked efforts to take it off me- see all the history of this-all in this blog if you read it all.

They finalised this effort to divest me at the 2010 hearing ( a hearing brought about by my crooked ex agent by the name of Robert Busbridge, where he wished to make my registration invalid) where the IPO now said openly that they had made a mistake back in 1996-giving me registration. It became obvious that in their arrogance and cheek that at this hearing that they were going to use it to rectify this mistake. All their corrupt practices since 2002 greatly cost me large losses of money, health and how it meant my business became now worth carrying on. At the beginning of their decision document by hearing officer, he said this: "The Marks, goods of the two parties are identical. The registration of the Trade Mark 2070139 (my registration Reference number after the Chrylser hearing) was accordingly granted in violation of the provisions of Sections 5(1) (2) (a) and should be declared invalid under sections 47 (2) (a) and (b) of the Trade Marks Act (1994) In fact I did not register it under the 1994 Act but under the 1938 Act, yet this doesn't seem to matter to them and they applied the later 94 Act-is this legal? I wonder, as the 38 Act could be very different to the 94 Act, but no matter, as since 1992 they have consistently behaved incompetently and illegally, so this is just normal behaviour by them and it's too late now. 

So at the time I'd had enough of the bastards, having had to endure 20 years of criminality and incompentcy from both the IPO and my crooked ex agent and the Dorset Police. I'd borrowed just over £6K to fight that 2010 hearing and suffered more incompetence from an alleged IP specialist lawyer, who failed miserably when up against the mighty IPO and their bottomless pit of tax payers money. The only way I could stop the IPO corruption was to fight them in the High Court and they knew this and knew I had no money to do it. So basically I gave up and never went further legally and so never even looked at whether their excuses re the parts of the TMA they said gave them the right to do what they did, was 100% right.

That is until now when trying to find something to do because of COVID, I started to look back at what those bastards in the IPO did over those many years and which were entirely illegal. With special attention as to how they deliberately smeared my integrity by making many lies to the Dorset Police and to each other in internal documents I got hold of etc- all about me and very personal too. They all showed a complete BIAS against me and civil servants in such cases are supposed to be unbiased in how they deal with any such cases.

From the records I still have and I still have all of them, I could see again the TMAct validations they claimed to have that enabled them to  rip away the very registration I had legally proved, gave me the rights to that TM- 'Viper'. Section 5 of the TMAct basically says that a trade mark application can be refused if there, at the time it was made, there was another entity using the same T/M and the goods were very similar or the same and already registered or I was guilty of passing off', as someone else had earlier rights due to use or registration.

Now here it is as plain as can be, that this is yet another IPO set up. THE FACTS ARE; at the time I started making my Cobra Replica kits and cars in Jan 1986, -there were no other car manufacturers using the T/M 'Viper' I did not engage as an agent- the Busbridge brothers- until Feb/March 1988 and when I did, I gave them the right to use the T/M for advertising purposes only-AS MY AGENTS AND NOT IN THEIR OWN RIGHT !! THAT IS BLINDINGLY OBVIOUS AND THIS IS NORMAL WITH ALL COMPANIES THAT USE AGENTS FOR THEIR PRODUCTS.

It was only when one of the brothers - Robert saw that in 1991 with Chrysler coming on the scene, it gave him the opportunity to make claims to them that he was the only company using the T/M and he wished to register it as well.  SO WHERE WAS THIS OTHER EARLIER REGISTRATION OR EVEN USE OF THAT MARK BY OTHERS,THAT THE IPO WERE NOW USING AS AN EXCUSE TO TAKE AWAY MY REGISTRATION???????? The Busbridges never used my Mark until around Feb/March 1988 and Chrysler never started advertising and/or importing their Viper Yank type sports tank, until well into the 90's!!

Now one should ask why Chrysler did not use the parts of the 1994 TMA that the IPO now used against me (even tho it would have had to be in 1990, when they applied-IT WOULD COME UNDER THE 1938 TMA that they would have to use and did that have the same provisions as the 94 TMA ??) They were at that time the 3rd biggest car manufacturers in the World and had the money to use Londons best IP Lawyers which they did use. THIS IPO EXCUSE STINKS.

Section 47 again is merely a repeat of Section 5 re earlier rights, registrations and use, which as I have pointed out - could not exist as NO ONE WAS USING, EITHER REGISTERED OR UNREGISTERED-THIS MARK - 'VIPER' BEFORE I STARTED TO USE IN IN JAN 1986.

So it is another example of how DEVIOUS CIVIL SERVANTS USE ACTS AND PARTS OF THEM WITH LOADS OF SECTIONS-SUB SECTIONS-AD INFINITUM, TO BLIND AND CONFUSE ALL AND SUNDRY. We, when I was in the Forces used to say that this kind of devious behaviour was 'BLINDING THEM WITH SCIENCE'  In this case blinding everyone with endless legal sentences in endless sections and sub sections. Knowing no one will be in a position to argue the toss, unless they APPEAL, - AFTER THE DECISION DOCUMENT CAME OUT MONTHS LATER AND THIS 2010 ONE TOOK AGES TO GET OUT - which they knew I could not afford to make-so they would get away with their subterfuge, illegality and corruption.. 

These kinds of acts are being done by devious corrupt civil servants all day long and not just to me and you can see endless examples that luckily make the papers and once again I say; we may as well be living in RUSSIA. !!!!!!!!  

AN OVERVIEW OF THE CLEAR INTENTION OF THE IPO TO TAKE AWAY MY TRADE

 MARK-VIPER-AND BY ANY MEANS.

I will now show how they achieved this and their illegal and corrupt methods that they used-they
will be seen in all the various stages of my fight with them and which kicked off right after they awarded me T/M in 2002. This was right after my fight with Chrysler, when they tried to register my Mark.

It is my contention that there was more than meets the eye to that fight but as with cases like this, I as a mere ordinary member of the public with very limited resources and clout, cannot prove what may have gone on between Chrysler and the IPO. However the FACTS of that battle and it was a battle, show that all was not squeaky clean. For a start why did the IPO deliberately allow theChrysler application case go on for over 6 years when their application and my opposition was pretty straight forward? When questioned years later why this was so, their incredible excuse was that it was not a straight forward case and 'unusual'. It could not have been more straight forward! Was Chrysler doing what many American companies do-using their clout to influence governments and their departments like the IPO? After all they were putting in a huge investment into setting up sales in Europe and organising a one make race series for their Viper V10?

So unfortunately I have to start the story after the date I eventually won my fight against Chrysler as they at last gave in and that was January 2002. The IPO then had to award me the Mark and if they had not they would have been breaking their own regulations. However IMMEDIATELY after they did that, they allowed Robert Busbridge who had been my London agent for my Cobra Replica – which I called  “Viper”, to oppose my registration and to also put in an application for him to register the T/M Viper. As the two applications were similar I was able to get the IPO to roll them both into one case.

To show how ‘suspect’ their allowing Busbridge to oppose my registration can be seen in a number of ways. Firstly they knew EXACTLY who he was and his HISTORY, as he appeared as a witness in the Chrysler hearing put in by them to denigrate me with accusations of me forging our agency agreement. They knew from my evidence in that case that he had been my agent from 1988 to 2001 when I sacked him and that he had tried to sell the rights to my Viper T/M to Chrysler for £½ M.  Now he was telling the court that I was a forger who had forged our agency agreement. This in order to show the court I was not to believed in anything I said.

However through what was said in the Chrysler hearing, they KNEW he had only started to have anything to do with the T/M Viper from 1988 onwards and that I had started to use it from Jan 1986, and even then it was as MY AGENT and was thus given the right to use my T/M, but only as my agent. Now it is incumbent on the IPO to study applications and the evidence presented, to make sure it was a bona-fide application. I have it in writing from the IPO that this is the case. Had they done this they would have seen that this was a CLEAR case of his application was being made in ‘bad faith’ as he obviously knew of my use of the T/M from 1986 onwards and during the time he was an agent of mine (1988-2001) he was only using it as my ‘agent’. So here we see the beginning of questions as to the honesty of the IPO and what were they up to?   

Then when they allowed him to go ahead despite my strong objections and comments on this irregularity, he obviously put in two evidence/statement documents backed up with reams of alleged documentary evidence, to back up his application. Another requirement of the IPO is to look at this evidence and the statements to check they are relevant as per Procedural Rules on Evidence. Here we see a second example of how biased the IPO were, as the vast majority of his evidence in all forms was totally irrelevant and highly derogatory to me. I believe that too shows that the IPO were up to no good and biased against me as evidence that is derogatory should not be allowed. For I was then obliged to counter Busbridges lies and forged documents he put in, instead of me having to just stick to relevant facts and IP law. To understand all that went on at that hearing you should read my book ‘Justice Denied’ and the chapter on that hearing.

In that book in Chapters 13, which dealt with all the evidence both I and Busbridge put in and in Chapter 14 which deals with the actual hearing. You will see all the ways the IPO through their Hearing Officer Reynolds, went against me at every turn. I believe that this hearing was a complete set up and I also believe that that can be readily seen in those chapters of the book as well. If you actually read the transcript of that Reynolds hearing you will see just how biased and a complete set-up it all was.

At this juncture it should be pointed out that in 1999 Busbridge attempted to have me jailed and thus out of his way,(maybe Chrysler had a hand in this?) by getting the Police to charge me with forgery, perjury and perverting the Course of Justice. You will see that he was totally unsuccessful in this and I WAS FOUND NOT GUILTY! Yet you will see that Busbridge in his Reynolds evidence for making my registration invalid, which it was allowed to stay in, he made much of this 'forgery case' in order to denigrate me and impute that my evidence was not to be  believed.  Why did the IPO allow that to stay in? Not only that, why did Reynolds actually and outrageously tell me when he was handling the hearing to have my registration voided, make reference to the fact that I had been charged with the forgery of our agency agreement document? When I protested that it was irrelevant to the case and should not have been allowed in AND IN ANY CASE I WAS FOUND ‘NOT GUILTY' he said that if the Forgery case had been carried out as a ’Civil Case’ I would have been found guilty. This astonishingly shows how biased he was and must have gone to the trouble to read up on the forgery case, even though it was a completely different case and NOT EVEN HEARD BY THE IPO, BUT IN A COUNTY COURT IN DORSET !!!! Thus this shows yet another example of IPO bias against me and how this hearing was a set-up.

Another example of how the IPO allowed in irrelevant evidence by Busbridge was the fact that I had taken out legal action against Busbridge for breach of copyright law for copying the Viper chassis I had designed. I WAS ABLE TO GET Legal Aid for this and took on a local large & well known Bournemouth law firm to handle it all. But the lawyer I had to deal with turned out to almost certainly, not to be a lawyer who specialised on IP matters and law. For he spent ages on the case getting nowhere, and Busbridges lawyer running rings around him. After around two years he then told me that EU IP law said that copyright only lasted 10 years and I had designed the Viper Jaguar based chassis in 1986 and it was now 1996 so I was out of time and had to drop it. Of course this was an outright lie, but I did not know that at the time and I trusted him, for after all he was a lawyer and then I trusted that lawyers knew what they were doing and yet I found out much later that copyright lasted 100 years !! I DON’T TRUST ANY LAWYERS ANY MORE - SINCE THEN !!

Reynolds made the snide remark that my action against Busbridge for Copyright breach ”had petered out”. Thus making it seem that I had had a weak case and had had to drop it….far from the case and as before-IT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THE CASE HE WAS HEARING. He had said it to belittle me and my case and make me appear to be a flaky and underhand type of person whose written evidence was not to be taken any notice of. THUS ANOTHER PIECE OF EVIDENCE THAT REYNOLDS WAS BIASED TOWARDS ME AND WISHED TO BE ON THE SIDE OF BUSBRIDGE.

There are so many ways that Reynolds showed his bias against me in that hearing that I will not go over each one of them. The two above I mention were so bad that they have to be pointed out as supreme evidence of how biased he was and therefore as he was acting on behalf fo the IPO, they too were biased and had directed him to behave the way he did. However there is yet one more example I should add; Busbridge in his evidence to try and show that my assertion, that because he had in 1993 gone bankrupt, he could no longer claim to own any asset such as a non registered T/M. So he claimed that whilst he was working off his bankruptcy, he had at the beginning of it had ‘assigned’ the non registered Viper T/M (can a non registered T/M be assigned? ) to a third party-a limited company he had set up with his wife -(favourite trick of criminals). I had pointed out that (a) how can a bankrupt do that (b) the limited company records showed he was listed as a company director of that company which was against the law as he was a bankrupt and he only came off when I complained about that to Companies House. (c) That Busbridge had taken many years to tell the IPO of these alleged ‘assignments’ and well out of the time limit for doing so, even if it had been legal to do this-which it wasn’t. Then incredibly on point (d)- he let the IPO know all about these alleged ‘assignments’ but not before his last act was to assign the T/M back to himself-just in time for the 2004 hearing- and the IPO swallowed all that !! THE POINT HERE IS THAT REYNOLDS AND THE IPO SHOULD HAVE SEEN ALL THIS AS BEING ALL ILLEGAL-SO NOT TO BE ALLOWED INTO THIS CASE AS EVIDENCE. This shows more bias towards Busbridge and against me.

After I inevitably lost this Reynolds case, I made such a fuss to the IPO about all their illegality over  the illegality of those alleged assignments, that they eventually decided to have another one of their Hearing Officers look at the whole case again. Now to show how underhanded the IPO were being-they never told me of this and the next thing is I hear, A YEAR OR MORE LATER, that they in 2005 will hold this hearing about the assignments. But I was not told what date or where it would be held or the exact date. This again shows up the corrupt nature of the IPO over all of this. For I should have been able to attend this hearing AS IT WAS ABOUT MY TRADE MARK !! and the hearing would not have been held had I not, in effect, made the IPO have to carry it out. So it was MY RIGHT to be at that hearing especially as they allowed Busbridge to attend it, so able to indulge in more of his lies and I was therefore not able to point them all to the criminal actions Busbridge had indulged in at that Reynolds hearing and to whoever was officiating at that hearing.

When I was eventually told what that hearing had decided (It was heard by a Mr Landau) I was ecstatic as I had WON AS HE FOUND BUSBRIDGE HAD NO RIGHTS TO THE T/M. Yet that feeling never lasted more than 5 minutes, as the IPO then inexplicably allowed RB to put in a request to appeal it! From here-on in, one can see just how corrupt the IPO are and what they were up to. For as most people should know; that even get an appeal for any legal matter, one has to (a) show fresh evidence (b) show that in law the Judge made mistakes and so on or that new evidence had since come to light. One simply cannot just say “I don’t like what the outcome was because I lost so I want an appeal”. Yet the IPO ignored all that in giving him an appeal, because his reasons 5or 6 of them, showed no reasons that could stand up in law for getting an appeal. So yet another example that the IPO simply did not want me to win anything and would do anything to stop me. What they now went on to do, made it ABSOLUTELY CLEAR THAT THIS WAS THE CASE.

IT CAN BE CLAIMED BY ME THAT FROM THIS POINT ON THE IPO WOULD STOP AT NOTHING TO TAKE MY T/M AWAY FROM ME & GIVE IT TO RB AND THEY WENT AND PLANNED A STRATEGY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN ACTS THEY KNEW I WOULD BE POWERLESS TO STOP IN-ORDER THAT THEY COULD WORK THIS.
 
1/ They told RB that his appeal could be heard by a third party and that they would be totally INDEPENDENT from the IPO. This person is called ‘THE INDEPENDENT PERSON’He chose that route.

2/ They made sure that this person who would be picked out by the Treasury Solicitors, was some one they knew very well and who they could get to ‘arrange things’ to go their way. The Barrister that was picked, a Hobbs QC, was a person who spent all or practically all of his professional life hearing various IP court cases in their courts. This is easily seen when you research his work history and what he officiated in. They obviously worked out with him a strategy they would use during that hearing, together with their Head of Law Office-a Mr James who also would be present,. (very unusual for this to happen) so the two of them would make sure the outcome was an IPO one.

3/  Any hearing decision document should be reported to all concerned within no more than a couple of weeks or even less. Yet the IPO DELIBERATELY withheld it from me for over a year and lied and lied to me and my MP as to why this was so.

When I eventually was told the outcome of that hearing, it was no surprise. In actual fact there had been no decision as the IPO & Hobbs had pursuaded Busbridge to drop his appeal !!!!! See the book ‘Justice Denied’ for all the facts on all this and see the CRIMINAL actions the IPO & Hobbs QC carried out at that bogus hearing. Read my blog:- “I am raging Mad” and see all the facts on that AND read the Transcript therein. You will see exactly what these corrupt bastards did. They knew that there was no way I would be able to appeal their actions and that’s why they made sure they kept their actions from me for over a year and refused me attendance to that bogus appeal hearing. It was no appeal hearing but merely a get together where the IPO through James and the ‘Facilitator’ Hobbs and the perpetrator Busbbridge could concoct a way to get round the Landau decision which had messed up the IPO’s desire to strip me of my legit T/M. Here you should know that the IPO Hearing Officers are supposed to be INDEPENDENT of everyone including the IPO. Most are and no doubt Tuck at the Chrysler hearing was, as was the H/O Landau. He put a spanner in the works of the CORRUPT IPO !!

In that transcript you will read some of the remarks that Hobbs made which make it clear the the IPO wanted rid of me-for some unknown reason.  I have annotated in the margins my comments of all the things said which were all illegal ‘advice giving’, but the most telling anti-myself remark made by Hobbs QC and to Busbridge and is seen on lines 1-3 page 33 is:- “ I have looked at, as you know the Registry (IPO) record, the case details, the case history, ( here he is actually stating he has read ALL the notes on all my fights in all the 3 hearings, from day one)….the long sordid history.

You should concentrate on that word-”SORDID” for what he is saying and implying is that everything I did and said in the two hearings I was involved in- were ‘sordid’ !! The Collins Dictionary states that this word means-’dirty, foul, squalid, degraded, vile and or base. Not only is it illegal for a judicial person to make such comments against a person who had been denied the ability to attend this hearing and therefore was not able to defend himself against this attack, but it shows that Hobbs is anti and heavily biased against myself (as would be the IPO by implication) and he is FOR the Appellant. How illegal is all that?? Not to mention that he trying to destroy my integrity AND I WAS NOT ABLE TO DEFEND MYSELF FROM HIS ATTACK AS I HAD BEEN DENIED ATTENDANCE- I WONDER WHY??? If the above remarks by Hobbs were not terrible enough, he then on line 5 says “I have the history at the same time relating to Chrysler on a mark which was 265 (Ref No) and this looks like a complete and utter mess to me” 

IT SHOULD BE NOTED HERE THAT THE TWO ABOVE COMMENTS MADE BY HOBBS QC WERE ABSOLUTELY 'ILLEGAL' - For Judges hearing any case are not allowed by law to come out with personal opinions and in this case they were opinions on matters that were not part of the 'appeal' he was supposed to be hearing.
For what he is again relating to is my opposition hearing against Chrysler and he is saying in his grand opinion that it was all a ‘an utter mess’ and if it was which I do not think for one moment it was-whose fault was that? Certainly not mine or my legal team. Yet the IPO obviously think it was and they were prepared to make me pay for it in order to correct a cock-up they obviously now thought they had made-up or rather that things never went the way they wanted and here I am sure they had struck up a deal with Chrysler.  The IPO have made it clear through Hobbs that they thought I was ‘sordid’ as seen in the above pronouncement and so they had no compunction to set out TO OVERTURN MY VICTORY. Starting with the corrupt 2004 Reynold hearing and then the Hobbs hearing. The fact that even if they had made a legal mistake in their hearing officers decision (Tuck) in 1996, who found for me- was it all MY FAULT? Then you should understand the fact I was going to lose all the monies they forced me to spend right up to 2010 and after, (around £20K) plus the ruination of my business and life - this was just all ‘tough titty’ was obviously what all in the IPO thought.

Now the point here can be made that the hearing vs Chrysler, was totally put together by my legal team, so how was it ‘sordid’ as everything they did and said was entirely ‘LEGAL’? At the 2004 hearing re Busbridge trying to make my registration void, all I did and said, was trying to show that all the statements put into his evidence by Busbridge were lies (perjury) and five of his documents were forgeries (with proof of that) -so how was all that ‘sordid; as one has a RIGHT to DEFEND ones position and in the way I was forced to do so.

When the IPO allowed Busbridge to oppose my T/M registration in 2002 from then on, I complained to the IPO as to why they did this, giving them my reasons. Obviously they did not like this but IT WAS MY RIGHT TO DO SO!  Much later on , through the Freedom of Information Act I required the IPO to furnish me with any letters, emails or notes they generated which were mentioning myself. It was a long shot as I wanted to see what anti myself remarks they had made against me. Strangely enough I was amazingly successful as I got a number of them sent me.

1/ In the earliest note dated 7th Jan 2004 2004 the writer (an AH) who was obviously an IPO worker probably working on the papers generated when I opposed Busbridge’s application to register my Trade Mark. He was seemingly making notes for a file they had on this ‘Viper’case and so any other IPO worker also working on this case would know what type of person I was. I had rung and spoken to him about the incompetence of the IPO in how they were handling this case. All that is OK but what was not OK is that he said; Mr Cook-”He seemed upset”. This as if one had no right to be upset at how the IPO were making mistakes etc and totally and ruinously affecting my business and livelyhood.
Comment; Then there was a second note below the first one by another IPO worker-a B.Povall, which related to him phoning me back-once again the emphasis is on how I felt and then at the end stating that I put the “phone down abruptly” and this once more is emphasis on how the writer had a bad opinion of me and on a ‘personal’ basis. How it can be deducted how I put the phone down is beyond me and it shows that he was more concerned with showing me up in a poor light rather than just relating what the conversation was about.   

2/ The second copy note was dated 25th Feb 2004 and this time by an unknown IPO worker. It states:   "There is a great deal of history between X (Busbridge) and the Registered Proprietor Mr Cook (I being the registered owner of the Trade Mark ‘Viper’)  
Comment; It should be noted that at this date, I had had limited contact with the IPO on any  personal level. I only had put in my evidence documents to Busbridges evidence statements, which were full of lies and forged documents and personal slights against me, which the IPO should not have allowed into evidence. So yes, I was annoyed and rightly so, as it showed incompetence and or bias. So these comments being made about me 'personally' when anyone in the IPO at that date had virtually no contact in any way with me. IT SHOWS WHAT WAS GOING ON IN THE MINDS OF SOME PEOPLE IN THE IPO AND AT AN EARLY STAGE OF MY CONTACTS WITH THEM....WHY WAS THIS??

The FACT is that by saying there is ‘a great deal of history’, he is passing a personal opinion because it implies there was bad blood between us and how could he really know that? And on a matter that should not have been his business. How was he aware of any ‘history’? - for to know that - (Did Busbridge speak with people in the IPO giving them his opinions about me?) if it was correct, he would have had to have read the reams of evidence RB put in and all my replies in my own evidence. This person would have to be a prominent person in that case and not just a clerk who would not spend ALL their time just on one case or in depth. That shows ‘BIAS’ against me and in any case what did he actually mean by ‘history’ ? It also shows the writer wishes anyone who would later on read the file-they should know all these personal feelings about me and to colour their opinions and further actions in this case and maybe to my detriment.
Then to say “Mr Cook can be very difficult’ again shows an extreme bias against me, especially as the writer does not qualify why I may be ‘difficult’. Of course what I think the IPO thought about me was formed by my not letting them get away with all their incompetence and bias against me and the slowness of all they did which was affecting greatly, my business. This by constantly pulling them up about all that. Also I was not backward in telling them what my opinions and thoughts were on all that-AS WAS MY RIGHT TO DO SO-AS THEY WERE MESSING UP MY LIFE & BUSINESS! PLUS AT THAT DATE AS I HAVE SAID, I'D HARDLY HAD THAT MUCH CONTACT WITH THE IPO-SO WHERE IS ALL THIS COMING FROM.??

3/  Now the action moves to how the IPO made anti Cook comments to the Dorset Police in order to colour how they viewed me and to get them to drop my request that they investigate all the perjury and forgery committed by Busbridge, in all the hearings he appeared in and gave evidence in. Between 2004 and 2009 I had complained to the IPO again and again that they investigate this, but was always ignored and denied. Yet in 2009 they said that at the last hearing set down to be heard in 2010, they would deal with it all then.
Just prior to that hearing I went to the Dorset Police with a large file showing all the cases of these criminal actions that he committed, when and where they were committed, the reasons he did that and the documentary evidence to back up all my assertions. They refused to deal with it as the IPO told them what they had told me and that was - it would be dealt with in the 2010 hearing. So I had to wait until I saw they indeed kept to their promises.

Of course the hearing did not even touch on any of that,  and I knew it would be so. So I then went back to the Police and asked them to now deal with it as the IPO had not done what they promised.
The Detective, a Sgt Brimicombe predictably went back to the IPO and now I was faced with
the IPO slagging me off to Brimicombe and telling outright lies to him about perjury- mainly to denigrate me and influence Brimicombe against me. My FIOA request was designed to try and find out EXACTLY what Haywood had verbally said to Brimicombe...but of course they never coughed that up-predictably. They were absolutely successful in this brainwashing of Brimicombe and I was then faced with a very belligerent and hostile Brimicombe who refused to investigate. His attitude was astonishing and he also threatened me that he walk walk out of the interview room !!!! when I tried to educate him on perjury etc. Note that the Met & Dorset Police were happy back in 1999 to charge me with perjury and forgery and even go as far as getting into a County Court at GREAT cost to the public, yet now they were doing all they could to deny me justice.

Now I knew that the IPO had sent Brimicombe a number of emails and one had told him that perjury hadn’t been committed and THAT IT WASN’T A CRIMINAL ACT BUT A CIVIL MATTER !! Again under the FOIA I requested copies of all emails and letters between the Police and the IPO. In the copies I got  was an email which clearly was designed to denigrate me, which is what in this document I am trying to show. It was from a Mr Haywood of the IPO to this Sgt Brimicombe and said; “Please see the attached document and below as requested, and a link to Mr Cook’s blog. Some of the entries I found extremely shocking and offensive, so beware if you read it.”…..HOW CLEAR AND DAMNING IS THAT AND CLEARLY DESIGNED TO COLOUR THE MIND OF THE POLICE AND GET THEM TO DROP AN INVESTIGATE THAT WOULD HAVE CLEARLY SHOWN THAT THE IPO FAILED IN LAW TO INVESTIGATE CRIMINAL MATTERS!!!!!!!
Needless to say it worked and all my complaints about that to various bodies were all whitewashed and I got nowhere...ALL VERY SHOCKING BUT THE NORM IN BRITAIN TODAY!!
Of course my blog was started in 2008 to show the Public all the criminal actions of the IPO and ALL bodies including the Police and could only be ‘Shocking’ to all those bodies. I don’t deny my language it’s forthright, to the point, pulls no punches and some of it can be swear words to emphasise my anger etc. SO MUCH FOR FREEDOM OF SPEECH, BUT THE British Establishment hate people like me who show them up for what they really are.

Finally the hearing in 2010;  Salthouse, the hearing officer in this hearing made remarks that again showed that the IPO had a bad opinion of myself and at this hearing were not afraid to voice them; the first evidence of the opinion of the IPO about me and this case can be seen by what him saying that the IPO had made mistakes in the past. He can only be referring to the fact that the IPO thought I should never have won against Chrysler and that was their mistake, because that is the ONLY hearing that I ever won in the 10 years between 1996 and 2010. So the only time the IPO could have made this mistake!!

At the beginning of that hearing Salthouse the Hearing Officer stated that the IPO were sick of this long ongoing case and once and for all wished at this hearing, to put an end to it all. Of course those words NEVER APPEARED IN THE TRANSCRIPT - I WONDER WHY?? 

He later on in the decision document said that the Trade Mark Viper stated that the Trade Mark Viper would be taken off me and it would be "as if it had never been awarded to me" Doesn't that just show that the IPO had indeed been of the mindset that at the 1996 Tuck hearing where I won against Chrysler had been a big mistake (but of course no reasons as to how it was a mistake have ever been forthcoming from the IPO) and so the IPO makes a mistake that ruined the life of a person and that is just "Tough Shit Lad" TO HELL WITH THE RULE OF LAW AND THAT THE UK JUSTICE SYSTEM IS THE BEST IN THE WORLD AS WE ESTABLISHMENT JOHNNIES ARE FOND OF TELLING THE PEASANTS AROUND THE WORLD-PASS ME THE SICK BUCKET !! 

 
So this last hearing which I viewed as my last chance to get JUSTICE and that was why I took on an IP Lawyer at a cost of £6500 which I had to borrow off my son. It again turned out that one has NO CHANCE TO WIN AGAINST THE STATE WHEN THEY DECIDE TO GET YOU. ON THAT SCORE A BARRISTER I CAME ACROSS TOLD ME THAT IN HIS EXPERIENCE IF YOU UPSET HIGH UP MEMBERS OF THE CIVIL SERVICE--THEIR FURY WILL KNOW NO BOUNDS AND THIS IS WHAT THEY WILL DO-JUST  AS THEY DID AGAINST ME- UK JUSTICE IN THE 21ST CENTURY AND ALL MY EFFORTS SINCE 2010 TO APPEAL TO EVERY POLITICIAN THAT HAS ANYTHING TO DO WITH OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM INCLUDING RIGHT UP TO THE JUSTICE MINISTER BUCKLAND HIMSELF !!, PLUS ALL THE JUSTICE SYSTEMS AVENUES TO APPEAL SUCH CRIMINALITY, BUT I HAVE GOT ABSOLUTELY NOWHERE.

For the British Establishment have bandied together to deny me any JUSTICE and all my attempts and the results can be seen in depth in my blog and with all with documentary evidence that backs up all I claim.

__________________________________________________________________________________

CORRUPT JONATHON JONES EX GLD. 96.

It is some time since I posted but I am still here and COVID has put a stop to trying to get JUSTICE as all our lazy civil servants are sitting at home doing nothing and all our MP's are only talking about Covid and now Brexit. EVERYTHING ELSE IN THE COUNTRY CAN GO TO HELL.

However it is the resignation of that arch liar and corrupt Jones bloke that has prompted this post for the unmitigated crap that he and his admirers have come out with, has been enough to make me want to puke.....what these assholes get away with is BREATH-TAKING - how easy it is to feed the gullable British Public & Media with utter lies. I would IMPLORE you to read all my posts going back at least for TWO YEARS. For they will show you how this fraudulent JONATHON JONES & JUSTICE MINISTER BUCKLAND have behaved towards my efforts to obtain justice over BARRISTER HOBBS QC and his unlawful acts and his perverting the course of justice.

We have Jones putting himself over as a paragon of virtue, whiter than white and therefore unable to stand by while (as he sees it) Boris changes a committment he made last year over the EU and N.Ireland and the borders, which all had to do with Brexit. Saying that would be unlawful etc, etc. IT IS SICKENING, for when you see how he DELIBERATELY ignored all the evidence he was given by me, that one of his fellow members of the Judicial Establishment had committed multiple unlawful acts and had perverted the course of justice. How arrogant and hypocritical can one get???

You will see in the post dated 4th June 2019, the copy of my 'Formal Complaint' to Jones which was 2 1/2 pages long and dated 25th March 2019 and also included 11 supporting copies of relevant evidence documents. What you do not know is that even tho' any government department that receives a 'Formal Complaint' it should be dealt with in a prescribed manner. Jones NEVER did that, but merely sent me a 'Fob Off' reply dated the 1st April 2019 of only 3 short paragraphs (see copy attached). He never dealt with any of my complaints about how his department were 'fobbing me off' over my requests for answers and it was one of his staff, a STEPHEN BROWN that was responsible. So here, he is quite happy to IGNORE the laid down requirements of how he should have dealt with a 'Formal Complaint'.....Yet he is bleating on about how he must resign because Boris is breaking the law so much, so he has to resign. HOW HYPOCRITICAL AND ARROGANT CAN YOU GET???

Then later on in 2019 when I got 'Hero' Ellwood to also tackle him over why he and his department are lying through their back teeth over having any responsibility for Hobbs QC and that had included all the documentary evidence he needed to see what had gone on (Transcript/Barristers opinion/and my explanationary letter). Yet his again, very short reply letter to Ellwood dated 4th Nov 2019, never dealt with ANY of what he had been sent, but merely 'Fobbed' me off, yet again, and  telling me to complain to the JCIO. This when I had said in my letter they along with EVERY other British Justice System department and avenue of complaints, had lied and also fobbed me off. Thus proving he had never read what was sent him. He could have told me or better still got someone in the system to handle this complaint and case. NO, IT WAS YET ANOTHER 'BRUSH IT UNDER THE CARPET' - BRUSH OFF. 

Of course Ellwood utterley failed to laise with me over this brush off which he could see, that is what it was. Didn't want to rock the boat and his trying to get up the greasy pole. IT SHOWS AGAIN WHAT A LIAR AND HYPOCRITE JONES IS. Not only that but Buckland had done exactly the same to me when Ellwood sent him the same complaint of mine and all the same evidence Jones had been sent. ( If you remember I asked Ellwood to deal with both Jones & Buckland) You will see copies of  of all that in previous posts along with my letter to him of the 12th Feb 2020...(See at the end of Post dated 18th Feb 2020) .WHICH PREDICTABLY WENT UNANSWERED.  Thus Buckland who also stuck up for Jones, is AS BIG A LIAR & HYPOCRITE AS JONES IS, and do not forget these two are THE TOP TWO LEGAL PEOPLE IN THE WHOLE OF THE BRITISH JUSTICE SYSTEM.

Copy Jones letter:-

To: Rt Hon Tobias Ellwood MP, House of Commons, London. SWIA 0AA.

From:  Jonathan Jones QC (Hon) Permanent Secretary HM Procurator General & Treasury Solicitor 102 Petty France, London. SWIH 9GL.

4 November 2019.

I am writing in response to your email dated 22 October 2019, Essentially Mr Cook's complaint is about the decision and/or conduct of Mr Hobbs QC whilst sitting as an `Appointed Person' on an appeal from the Intellectual Property Office in 2009. Mr Cook appears to believe that Mr Hobbs QC was an employee of GLD, or that GLD are or were responsible for `supplying' Appointed Persons to the IPO. As we have explained to Mr Cook on more than one occasion, this is not correct as the Ministry of Justice have this responsibility. The appropriate forum for complaints about personal conduct of judicial office holders is the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office - although complaints to that body must ordinarily be made within three months of the matter complained of.

I hope that this of some assistance to you in advising your constituent. 

JONATHAN JONES QC 

***** You should note that when he says I am complaining about the 'DECISION' that Hobbs allegedly made, this shows one of two FACTS. (A) He is lying because!! THERE WAS NO DECISION as the alleged 'Appeal' was dropped on the ADVICE of Hobbs (illegal) SO NO DECISION!! This is the absolute lie that EVERY complaints department and person has made over the past 10 years, in order to trash my complaints. FOR IT GIVES THEM THE RIGHT TO SAY THAT NO DECISION MADE IN A COURT OF LAW CAN BE QUERIED BY THE PEOPLE AND DEPARTMENTS I HAVE BEEN TO......GET IT?? THIS EVEN IS STILL SAID, WHEN I HAVE TOLD THEM AD NAUSEUM THAT 'NO DECISION WAS MADE' !!!......THEY JUST CONVENIENTLY IGNORED ME ON THAT. 

Or (B) he never read the transcript which showed NO DECISION or any of my other evidence stating this. Either way it shows what a disreputable person both Jones and Buckland are. Yet here they are on the public stage day after day spouting their arrogant and hypocritical rhetoric and a fawning MEDIA.

Making themselves out to be paragons of virtue and whiter than white who should be applauded and congratulated. PASS ME THE SICK BAG!!

TO REALLY UNDERSTAND WHAT BUCKLAND AND JONES ARE REALLY ALL ABOUT I IMPLORE YOU READ READ MY POST OF THE 18TH FEB, FOR THERE YOU WILL FIND COPIES OF WHAT JONES SAID TO ME, DENYING RESPONSIBILITY FOR INVESTIGATING HOBBS QC, PLUS WHAT BUCKLAND SAID IN HIS REPLY TO MY ASKING HIM TO ALSO INVESTIGATE THE ACTIONS OF HOBBS AND MY REPLY TO HIM WHICH WAS IGNORED!

YOU WILL ALSO SEE HOW MY EFFORTS TO GET THE EXECRABLE ELLWOOD MP TO DO HIS JOB AND ON BEHALF OF ONE OF HIS CONSTITUENTS. HOW HE MESSED ME ABOUT FOR A YEAR AND THEN IN EFFECT TOLD ME TO 'GO FORTH AND MULTIPLY.'!

THE POST IS LONG AND INVOLVED BUT IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN HOW OUR CORRUPT POLITICIANS AND SO CALLED JUSTICE HIGH-UPS ACTUALLY BEHAVE, YOU WILL SEE IT ALL IN THIS POST.

******THESE ARE ALL FACTS THAT OUR ILLUSTRIOUS PRESS ARE REFUSING TO INVESTIGATE THUS SHOWING THEY ARE AS CORRUPT AS THE POLITICIANS*****

CORRUPT GOVERNMENT LEGAL DEPARTMENT + MoJ.95.

THE FOLLOWING POST IS A LONG ONE BUT PLEASE STAY WITH IT AND READ IT ALL....FOR IT WILL SHOW YOU WHAT ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC HAS TO PUT UP WITH ALL LIES OUR CIVIL SERVANTS TELL YOU IN ORDER TO GET OUT OF ADMITTING THEY ARE SCREWING YOU AND THUS RUINING YOUR BUSINESS AND OR LIFE. PLUS HOW IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO GET JUSTICE UNLESS YOU ARE A MILLIONAIRE.

Despite it now being 5 months since I last posted, I have not been resting. Actually those months I have been more active than normal, with me sending off more emails of enquiry and attempting to get my useless MP, Poshboy Tobais Ellwood to do his job. That is to represent his constituents and HELP THEM when they are being ridden roughshod over their rights by his government departments.

But of course this parasite is only interested in one thing and that is riding ever more higher up the greasy pole of politics. During this past 5 months he's been never off  TV news programmes and in newspapers, giving we peasants evidence of his prime intelligence on all manner of subjects. Mind you I was very happy when Boris kicked him out of his cushy job as a Junior Minister in the MOD.
However I now see he's wangled his way into another cushy job running some committee. As the chairman where he can practise being the bully he is. It is the Common Defence Select Committee.
How he conned himself onto that cushy number.? But more to the point what the hell makes him fit to run that.? For all he was a Captain and they are ten a penny as its only the second rung up his ladder to power and fame. You automatically get to Captain after a couple of years in the Army
What does he really know about Defence and ALL matters to do with that AND on a World scene??


Let us face it and be honest.....what are the Green Jackets when they are out? They were just a foot sloggers mob and you don't need to be Einstein to get into their regiment. When I was in the RAF
we used to call army blokes PONGOES and held them generally in contempt. The nickname was so  and meant "Where the Army goes, the pong goes"  Self explanatory and applies to our arch brown noser Tobias the poshboy Ellwood.  

But when it comes to actually representing one of his constituents who is being trashed by one of his governments departments, he has done EXACTLY the same as he did the last time in 2017 when I asked him to look after the interests of a constituent. Namely approach the Dorset Police and ask them why they did virtually nothing when one of their PC's 'perverted the course of justice'.

Forward to the current problem, I knew that he would repeat his lack of interest in representing one of his constituents, if I again approached him. However I wanted to be able to show the World that that would be indeed, how he would react to any request I made to him. So I asked that he approach the Government Legal Department and the Ministry of Justice and ask both why they were refusing (in effect) to investigate the criminal actions of Hobbs QC at that bogus IPO Appeal Hearing and crooked meeting (in 2006) he had with my ex agent and when he gave him a couple of hours of free legal advice. (all to be seen further back in this blog) For this is what I had asked these two bunches of corrupt bodies of civil servants (MoJ + GLD) to do. However as you will have seen, I had got nowhere in my efforts there and I'd reached the point where I now needed to test him again. You can see at what point I was at, by reading the previous post.

Now having been a member of the Army for 5 years, he boasts on his website about this and also boasts that because of his Forces time he now likes to look after veterans. I wrote to him telling him I had this problem with the GLD and MOJ and would he agree to approach them if I got nowhere with them. He said he would, so after I got to the point where both departments were lying through their back teeth and refusing to deal with Hobbs and investigate his criminal acts ( I had sent them the transcript to show what he'd done, plus my barristers opinion on that and a brief description of the case) The MoJ said they had no jurisdiction to investigate and the GLD had said they had never employed Hobbs let alone put him forward as an Appointed Person to hear the alleged Appeal Hearing....and this despite me supplying them with a copy of the email from the IPO which confirmed they had supplied Hobbs to them for that bogus hearing.

I pointed all this out to Tobias in emails, which is harder to get across than had I been allowed by 'His Majesty Tobias' to meet with him and verbally go over it all and with the documentary evidence. I had in several letters to Tobias and as briefly as I could, laid out the facts around that bogus hearing and supplied him with a copy of the transcript plus a copy of the barristers opinion. Tobias never even acknowledged receipt and had not asked me any questions about any of the facts. I know that no one could read all that I had given him AND NOT HAVE QUESTIONS THAT HE WOULD HAVE WANTED CLEARING UP. So I was convinced that he had not read anything much, if at all.

Eventually his office girl Elizabeth Mahon told me, but only after I had asked her, that Tobias had sent to Buckland MP the Minister for Justice, a copy of something I had supplied him with. Had Tobias been a competent MP he would have told me what he had actually given to Buckland and in fact he should have given him the transcript, the Barristers opinion letter and my explanation letter. So as he didn't do that I had NO IDEA WHAT BUCKLAND WAS LOOKING AT. This was brought home to me when I was eventually given a copy of Bucklands reply to Tobias and I was very angry when I took that in. For his letter showed me that either he had not been given much at all by Tobias and had merely contacted the MoJ and asked them what they could tell him about any contacts I'd had with them. Which of course what they gave him was just a load of made up lies. I will put onto this post, copies of all this so you can see what I am on about.

I was also told that Tobias had asked the GLD for their comments but they were waiting for their reply. I sent this Elizabeth several emails over a number of months asking her 32 questions that she never answered. In fact I sent her three emails which she completely ignored. It became apparent that in fact, both she and Ellwood were just going through the motions of helping me, but were in actual fact conning me.

You will see all this that went on from the end of September to recently. For on the 10th Jan 2020 when I sent Tobias an email complaining that after 9 months he had got nowhere, that Buckland had erroneously stated in his letter a load of nonsense and that the GLD had lied through their back teeth.
He replied a few days later by sending me the letter I ALWAYS KNEW HE WOULD SEND. For he had over the previous 9 months had predictably done nothing IN REAL TERMS, because all he had done was pretend he was pushing for anwers. Now I had him against the wall and he could not now go on with his pretence. But the cheeky lying bastard still tries it on by saying he had tried to help.
When all he had done was to act once again as a mere postman, instead of fronting the MoJ and Buckland, the guy who runs our so called Justice System and the GLD Boss a Mr Jonathon Jones and to ask why they were refusing to act and give up ANSWERS as to their failing to deal with my requests and most of all why they were lying all the time.

Well it is all there at the end of this post, as there are ALL the emails and letters for you to see. I have now replied to the Buckland letter (on the 11th Feb) and explained how it bears no relation to what I had asked be investigated. I doubt if it will be answered and even if it is all I will get is more lying excuses. Mark my words. It will go on this blog if I ever get a reply.

1/9/19.
Dear Mr Ellwood,

Further to my letter to you of the 30th ]uly. 2019. ~ I included in that letter to you, the documents I had to send to the Parliamentary Ombudsman. Let me explain to you why I found it necessary to be trying to complain to them about the actions of the Government Legal Department and the MOJ. This explanation will not be short.

As I outlined in my letter to you; since 2008/9 I have been trying to obtain justice because of the unlawful actions committed by Hobbs QC in a bogus and alleged `Appeal Hearing' held in 2006 in London. Hobbs did not hold this alleged appeal hearing as a bona-fide appeal hearing, but as nothing more than a cosy meeting between him and my ex business agent, so he could give him 46 pages of legal advice as to how he could circumvem the previous decision made by Hearing Officer Landau and which went against him. That meant I had won and my long battle against my theiving ex agent should have been over.

But NO, my long held suspicious that the IPO had an agenda to divest me of my legally held Trade Mark of VIPER, was further enhanced when they gave my ex agent (Busbridge) an appeal. You must know that to get an appeal one has to have bona-fide facts and reasons and not just saying you did not like the decision, so you wish to appeal .... THAT IS LEGAL FACT! ! (Check that with your wife ! !) He gave absolutely no legal reasons in his statement, yet the IPO gave him an appeal. ! ! This further told me that IPO had an agenda against me.

You should also take note of the fact that I had to fight a TEN YEAR LEGAL BATTLE AGAINST NO LESS THAN CHRYSLER, the third largest car manufacturer of that time, as they wished to register this T/M for themselves. They had the money and top I/P lawyers, yet I WON and thus got the Trade Mark I had been using for at least ten years. I was so busy with my car business which was surging ahead, that I had not registered it. On the onset of that action against Chrysler my ex agent tried to sell my Viper trade mark to Chrysler for £1/2M and that shows what a thief and criminal he was and is. (I had common law rights to it even before it became registered and he had no rights to it) It became quickly apparent that the IPO did not like the fact I had won, and that was born out by statements they made and actions they took during my continuing battle with Busbridge, who was clearly aided by the IPO from 2002 to 2010. As he acted as a witness for Chrysler, the IPO know full well what he was up to and the lies he was coming out with, yet they allowed him to start an action to register the trade mark, minutes after they gave me registration.

By 2002 I was out of money to fight Busbridge and the IPO, and that was because Busbridge was able to make copies of my car (he also stole my chassis design as well as the body shape) and use my Trade Mark since 1992, thus drastically cutting my sales and my profits. Everything I had built up was being strangled, as was my long held wish to be able to put aside monies for my impending retirement when 65.

Had the bogus hearing not been held, the downfall of my business would not have happened and I could have built it up again to its former high position in the Kit Car world. (Before the original compnay BRL was closed to get rid of my Yank investors and I started up a new company on my own. How successful BRL was is easily seen in my reams of documentary and video evidence, as are the export orders for millions of pounds in value}. So it is that bogus hearing that proved to be the tipping point for my new business and the ruination of my life. You should try and understand that my business should and could have made enough profits to see me into my old age and be very comfortable too and I would not have been the burden on the taxpayer as I have been since 2002, when I had a heart attack over the stress I suffered to that date. I am attaching the transcript of that bogus hearing and the legal opinion I got on the unlawful acts that took place in it. You will on that transcript, be able to read my notes in the outer columns and they show the unlawful goings on, in it.

I am quite sure that you will be of the opinion that all this is a legal matter and it should be the courts that deal with it. Thinking that, would be a `get out' for you to do nothing. However you, if you felt like that, you would be committing the same lack of understanding and indeed the cynical making up of excuses that I have been consistendy dealt, from every judicial body that I've approached for justice, since 2008/9. (See attached list) So I want you to now understand EXACTLY what I am trying to do as of NOW and what I am asking you to do. That is to point out to you that it is the cynical unlawful behaviour of Hobbs QC at that bogus hearing which went on to pervert the course of justice for me. How I cannot get justice as I have no money to take it to court and all my attempts to get the judicial bodies that exist to act against one of their own, were blocked.

You I am sure, will know that perverting the course of justice is a `CRIMINAL ACT' Had Hobbs not done what he did, I would have continued to use the T/M that I had successfully proved was mine to own via registration. That is why what he did, perverted the course of justice as my T/M was cynically taken away from me and WITH ABSOLUTELY NO EXPLANTION AS TO WHY THE IPO DID THAT AND UNDER WHAT LAW GAVE THEM THE RIGHT T0 DO IT? However  I know that the whole judicial system in this country and the Establishment, would absolutely hate to have one of their kind up in court on such changes. Hence why they have all blocked all of my attempts to get justice with a litany of excuses, outright lies and the twisting of the facts and my evidence. (which is ALL IN IRREFUTABLE DOCUMENTARY FORM-AND ALL IGNORED)

How can a poor member of the British public take a high up QC to court?? Firstly as I have already said- NO LEGAL AID except for criminals and immigrants. The Police (Dorset and Met) earlier on when I went to them about earlier criminal acts by Busbridge in all the evidence he gave in 6 different tribunal hearings, behaved as they always do nowadays. They dismissed my evidence saying it was not criminal and I should take it to court myself, This after they had connived and hobnobbed with the IPO. (ALL provable) They also were extremely aggressive and threatening. So if I went to them over this QC, I WOULD GET NOWHERE. So I have had to conduct all my efforts to bring Hobbs QC to justice, by myself. They all apparently think I am just a uneducated peasant that they can walk all over. They picked the wrong person, as I am not thick and have the brains to carry on this fight as I am doing, to this stage and will continue as long as I have to.

When Hobbs QC acted at that bogus hearing, he acted as an `Appointed Person' as Busbridge had asked for it to be heard by an `Independent' person, which is what Hobbs should have been. Busbridge because he'd lost the previous hearing probably thought that the IPO were not Independent. Now this is fact:- `Independent Appointed Persons' are supplied to the IPO by the Treasury Solicitors. (now also known as `The Government Legal Department') Also as Busbridge was appealing against an action made by the IPO,(the hearing that he lost) any bona-fide appeal hearing would have NOT HAVE HAD ANY IPO MEMBER ANYWHERE NEAR IT ! ! Yet at this bogus hearing an IPO Law Officer Manager by the name of James, was present- WHY?? You will see he connived with Hobbs and that was highly irregular and indeed cynically unlawful.

When the Transcript is read it is very apparent to every a non law person, that this was not being run as an appeal hearing. I have had appeal bearings and know full well what is discussed and gone over at a bona-fide hearing. This means that Hobbs should have gone into all the reasons that Busbridge gave for having his appeal upheld. You will not see any such discussions doing just that. No, what you will see is a sea of never ending advice being given to Busbridge, lasting 46 pages and probably up to two hours in duration, as to how he can get out of the legal spot he now was in. He is actually told exactly what to do and how to do it and that James and the IPO would HELP HIM.  IT IS OUTRAGEOUS, not only that, but it's arrogant to be thinking they could get away with it. You will also see evidence that Hobbs had clear anti Cook ideas and about my winning against Chrysler. His outrageous and illegal statements on that give the game away, but then Hobbs knew I had no power and he had all the power he needed to squash  any complaints made by me. So how could I win against the likes of him, as he knew his Establishment mates would get behind him and protect him if I was stupid enough to fight his actions?

In that he was dead right as I've said already. I am sick of hearing Politicians and people in the Justice system pontificating on TV and in newspapers, especially now over this nonsense going on about Brexit, stating we live in a democraey that lives under the rule of law. Yet what has been done to me, means a coach and horses has been driven right through our so called Justice System. For when a Barrister QC (who can also act as a Judge) does what Hobbs did, where is the rule of law, there??? For the law was broken by him on at least 13 times, including perverting the course of justice. For in 2010 after the IPO had indeed made sure in 3 subsquuent bearings after that 2006 bogus hearing, that they all went Busbridges way. in the last one, held in 2010, their last act, was to illegally take away my legally registered T/M, telling me "it would be as if I'd never had owned it"  ! !

That Hearing Officer also said that the IPO had made mistakes, but he never said what  they were or when they were made. I presume that what he meant is that the IPO made a mistake in letting me win over Chrysler. However that means that both my legal team representing me and my case AND all the top lawyers acting for Chrysler, had all fallen down on their jobs as had the IPO Hearing Officer.So the IPO were now making good on their incompetence and putting things right. HOW LAWFUL IS THIS??

At that 2010 hearing I was legally represented by an IP lawyer, paid for by my son and he said he was astounded by what had gone on at that hearing and how the IPO could think they could get away with it. He wanted me to appeal to the High Court, but that was not possible as I had no money to do so.
So you see as I have said, the tipping point in the sordid history that has ruined me, was that bogus set up and alleged appeal hearing. The explanation as to why they set it up is no doubt thus: The 2004 hearing which was brought about by Busbridge applying to register the Trade Mark `Viper' which was already lawfully registered to me, so I was obliged to oppose it. However the IPO despite all my documentary evidence backing my opposition AND showing that Busbridge had committed over 200 acts of outright perjury and five acts of forgery in all his witness statements for that hearing, they did nothing about the perjury/forgery and clearly sided with Busbridge and allowed him to register HIS OPPOSITION TO MY T/M. Thus there were now TWO businesses who had registration of the same Mark ..... highly irregular and eventually made my business untenable.

However I went on to very strongly complain that Hearing Officer Reynolds, in that hearing, deliberately allowed into evidence, claims (especially of alleged transfers of who owned the trade mark to others)  that were clearly not true and they had been concocted by Busbridge. Hence the IPO clearly felt obliged to have the whole hearing looked at by another Hearing Officer  named, Landau.That is clearly very unusual. Landau decreed that Busbridge had no right to the T/M and clearly I had won and the CEO of the IPO said so.Yet the IPO then clearly did not wish things to rest. They knew that I and Busbridge had represented ourselves. That meant that as they wished to thwart me and to wrest my T/M from me, they had to give Busbridge legal advice as to how he could with their help, turn the tables on me.

They could not risk giving him WRITTEN advice in case I got my hands on that. So even though he could show no legal bona-fide reasons to appeal, they obviously decided to give him an appeal and to keep me away from that bogus hearing, so I would not be able to see what they were going to be up to. As you will see in the transcript they gave him all the advice they thought he would need AND it is CLEARLY OBVIOUS they were giving him advice ....... which is highly ILLEGAL and in itself-PERVERTS THE COURSE OF JUSTICE! !

One of the repeated and lying excuses made by all the justice departments I've gone to, including the GLD and the MOJ is that they could not question the decision in a legal case. YET HOBBS ADVISED BUSBRIDGE T0 DROP THE APPEAL AND NO DECISION WAS EVER MADE. I have that in writing more than once, so there WAS NO APPEAL AND NO DECISION MADE, yet all the liars in the Justice System keep using that lie to get out of doing anything re my complaints.

I then approached the MOJ to get them to investigate Hobbs and that bogus meeting and the criminal acts he carried out. Astoundingly they-the top department of all our justice departments and one would think are responsible to the whole of the UK Justice System, used the excuse that they have no jurisdiction and presumably over criminal acts ..... WHAT LIARS.

I was forced to then go right to the government legal department that supplied Hobbs to the IPO. They denied they supplied Appointed Persons to the IPO, even though I showed them the letter I had from the IPO saying they went to the T/Solicitors to get A/P's! ! They denied, despite all the evidence I have and that shows they are heavily involved in all the appeals against IPO decisions that require A/P's to hear them. What they do is all on the record and that the IPO even pay A/P's, so how independent does that make the A/P, of the IPO??? Naturally I made complaints about both the GLD and the MOJ to the Parliamentary Ombudsman although I knew them to be as devious as the GLD/MOJ. True to form they have done nothing but lie through their back teeth as to why there is nothing wrong with what either department have said. Of course I have all the documentary evidence of what I've said to both and what they have replied with-ALL THEIR LIES. You have seen both my complaints as they had to be sent via yourself.

WHAT ALL THIS BOILS DOWN TO IS THAT THE JUSTICE ESTABLISHMENT SIMPLY DO NOT WISH TO HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH ALL THIS, TO BE HEAVILY INVESTIGATED AND EXPOSED. HOWEVER YOU HAVE THE POWERS TO GO IN AND ASK QUESTIONS AND ASK THAT ALL IS INVESTIGATED-INCLUDING THE CRIMINAL ACTIONS OF HOBBS.  HOWEVER AS I SAID IN MY LETTER OF THE 30TH JULY TO ELLWOOD MP, TO DO SO WILL TAKE GUTS. For any MP would be taking on the might of the Justice Establishment and all their undoubted power. Are you willing to do that for a constituent????? Are you willing to have your copybook blemished???
"I therefore ask you to let me know if you will take all this on for me, an ex serviceman THAT YOU SAY YOU ALSO REPRESENT, and you intimated you were willing to approach the MOJ and you would also have to approach the GLD. I am telling you they will lie through their teeth and will tell you they have done nothing wrong etc, etc and no doubt you will feel you have to believe all they say. I know how all these people work, having had to deal with them and many other government departments, since 1992. As far as I am concerned nearly all civil servants are incompetent and consumate liars, who will never admit to any wrong doings.
If you truly are willing to take this on, I will have to show you all the documentary evidence in addition to what I an attaching to this email and aliswer any questions you should have to ask me".

Best Regards.  Ken Cook.

                                            *************************

The following letter is what Ellwood sent the Justice Minister....not exactly a face to face meeting where Ellwood could and should have been asking him why his MoJ was in effect, refusing to act and investigate what looked like a Barrister employed by them, committing criminal acts. No, all he does is POST an inconclusive letter and that is not taking up a case on behalf of one of his constituents. When he gets the reply, had he read all of my above letter, he would straight away see that Buckland isn't addressing the facts of my complaint at all and is referring to things that are nothing to do with it.

To:
Robert Buckland QC MP
Lord Chancellor and Seoretary of State for Justice Ministry of Justice
102 Petty France London SWI H 9AJ

20 September 2019

Mr Ken Cook,

Our Ref: TE10176

I am writing in relation to the above named constituent who has been in contact with me regarding his correspondence with the Ministry of Justice,
As you will see from the attached document, Mr Cooks case has a significant amount of history to it, but in essence, he believes that the Ministry of Justice should be investigating his case in which he believes a Barrister has committed unlawful and criminal actions, and that this was aided by the lntellectual Property Office.
Mr Cook has previously brought his case to the Ministry of Justice but has been told that this is not a case for the Ministry to deal with, therefore he has also taken his case to the Parliamenfary Ombudsman as per the advice given to him.
My constituent is not satisfied with the dealings he had with the Ministry of Justice and the explanations given to him regarding the dismissal of his case, therefore I am seeking an explanation as to why the Ministry of Justice has no jurisdiction over this case, in order that I can best advise my constituent.

Thank you in advance for you assistance with this.
 
Yours ever,

***** Why say this (the highlighted words) and exactly what did poshboy actually give him?  Well I gave him heaps of evidence which it is obvious he NEVER gave this Buckland fellow. So why was this?? No wonder the reply from Buckland never dealt with ANYTHING that was in those evidence documents. WHAT A SHOWER THESE PARASITICAL OAFS ARE!!!!!! **** 


The following are copies of emails sent to Ellwood and his replies. Most will be self explanatory.
You will see how I am being messed around and having questions unanswered and getting nowhere.
Then in the end he knows he will have to now jack it in and get rid of me, as he simply will not answer anything and what excuse can he give as to why I am not getting answers and action on ANY front.

From:   ken cook (sailerboy63@yahoo.co.uk)
To:        elizabeth.mahon@parliament.uk
Date:    Monday, 30 September 2019,16:30 BST

Hi,

I have been  going through all the letters and emails between us. I can see that it is now TWO MONTHS (30th July) since I asked Tobias to act against the Parliamentary Ombudsman, the GLD and the MOJ. I can also see that all he has done is ask the MOJ why they say they have no jurisdiction etc, when also you should have asked why they refuse to investigate Hobbs. I can see that you say you have approached the P/Ombudsman and asked why I haven't received an answer. I pointed out to you that that was entirely wrong and why. Yet you have not responded to that and nor have you picked up from my facts given you that you should have asked them is why they sided with the MoJ and took no action against them? This because they said the MoJ said they had no jurisdiction but gave no reasons why and certainly did not advise me WHO COULD INVESTIGATE HOBBS QC and what he did. Similarly it is the same over the GLD as they failed to act against them

Then you made no mention of you asking the GLD why they lied and refused to answer my three questions or investigate Hobbs or giving me advice as to how I could get an investigation started.

You did inform me that you had asked Robert Buckland to seek answers re the MOJ failings. But you gave no date for doing that or re the Ombudsman.  Nor have you asked them why they seem to ignore the facts that Hobbs acts need to be investigated, (His criminal acts, not some minor acts that can be investigated internally) I look forward to all the lies they will come out with, but you should be prepared for them. So I now show you again why they should investigate Hobbs. He worked for the GLD (Treasury Solicitors) or through them and at that time the GLD openly on their website stated they were an 'arm' of the MOJ and that makes sense for surely the MOJ cover ALL of the justice system departments in the UK. Plus what he did was criminal and so either they should instigate an investigation or they should ask the Met to do so) It definitely should not be the case that they say I SHOULD ask the Met as I did ask them to investigate criminal acts that happened that were allied and connected with this case and they refused (as they always do these days) Nor should I be told I should take legal action myself as I have no money to do so and how would I do that? ln any case as it is clearly a Police matter OR THE MOJ HAVE MEANS TO INVESTIGATE?? All this has been said to you in various emails and all this has already been pointed out to you in my email of the 20th Sept which you seem to have not taken in or commented on .... at all.

Then you failed to come out with any remarks to my email of the 13 Sept in which I suggested that in order for Tobias to get all the facts re this sordid case, he could view my .Youtube video. That would be 100% better than any face to face surgery, between us. For in the past his surgery was too short a meeting and a bit like a Doctors, of only 10 minutes. My case would need a meeting of no time limit in order to cover all the facts.

Then you have also completely ignored what I said about you saying I had abused Tobias. Your remarks on that subject AND the fact you say that your decision is FINAL is against all the rules that government departments have to work to. The Public have the right to be able to appeal such matters. This case is a judicial matters case and under the HRA section 6, I am entitled to be treated FAIRLY, In any case your acting like this cannot be anything other than unfair.


Regards,

Ken Cook

THIS EMAIL WAS TOTALLY IGNORED AND UNANSWERED !!

THE FOLLOWING EMAIL IS WHAT I GOT FROM BUCKLAND AND YOU WILL SEE HOW IT FAILS TO DEAL WITH MY REQUEST THAT HOBBS BE INVESTIGATED.

The Right Honourable Robert Buckland QC MP
Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice.

HIP ref: TE10176 HOJ ref: MC72844

October 2019

COURT CASE

Thank you for your letter of 20 September on behalf of your constituent, regarding his concerns about his court case.

I am sorry to read of how pursuing this case has affected Mr Cook's health. I realise he is unhappy with the handling of his case and raises concern about the conduct of a barrister and court staff at the  Intellectual Property Enterprise Court based at the Royal Courts Of Justice.

I hope you will understand that I cannot comment on individual cases, as decisions are taken by the independent judiciary. It is important I do nothing that could be seen to undermine this independence Where a party believes that the law has not been correctly applied, the correct process is to appeal the decision. I appreciate Mr Cook believes that he has not had a fair hearing and that his trademark was taken away unlawfully but I cannot review his case or the judge's decision.

Neville Collins from HM Courts and Tribunals Service!s (HMCTS) Customer Investigations Team wrote to Mr Cook on 12 February 2018 in reply to his letter to former Secretary of State. the Rt Hon David Gauke MP. Mr Collins explained that decisions made by the tribunal can be appealed to the appointed person who is a senior intellectual property lawyer appointed by the Ministry Of Justice at the High Court, or by appealing directly to the High Court. Given the time that has now passed, Mr Cook may also need to ask for permission to appeal the order. More information about how to do this can be found at www.gov.uk/guidance/trade-mark-disputes-resolution-hearings

I realise Mr Cook has concerns about the conduct of court staff and the barrister who was involved in the case. Although Mr Cook mentions that he has taken his case to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO}, my officials have not been able to locate receiving a complaint from him about the conduct of court staff. HMCTS operates a complaints procedure. This allows the court or tribunal where the problem has occurred to investigate and put things right. Mr Cook can make a complaint directly to the court who will consider his concerns and write to him with the outcome Of their investigations, They will also provide him with details of how he can escalate his complaint to the next stage if he remains dissatisfied. HMCTS' complaints procedure must be exhausted before the PHSO will look at his concerns.

lf Mr Cook has not done so already` then he may be able to complain about the barrister to the Bar Standards Board.  More information about what they do and how to complain can be found at: www.barstandardsboard.org.uk.
As explained by Mr Collins, The Chartered Institute of Trade Mark Attorneys (www.citma.org.uk) and Chartered Institute Of Patent Attorneys (www.citpa.org.uk) may be able to help Mr Cook contact other legal advisors who specialise in this area of law.  I appreciate Mr Cook is concerned at the cost of legal advice to appeal to the High Court. These institutes may be aware of advocates who would be willing to offer a pro bone service whereby Mr Cook does not pay for the advice and representation.

I hope my reply explains why I cannot review Mr Cook's case and he understands the reasons why
I hope it also explains how he may be able to get help to pursue his case and complaints if he wants to.
RT HON ROBERT BUCKLAND QC MP

   **************************************************************************

From:   ken cook (sailerboy63@yahoo.co.uk)
To:        elizabeth.mahon@parliament.uk
Date  Thursday,10 October 2019

Thank you for sending me the letter.(Bucklands letter) However I have to say that this reply letter is the EPITOMY of what I have had to put up with for many years. It is a typical reply which shows that the person writing did not understand EXACTLY what I was writing and complaining about, OR they did and have indulged in a reply that typically and deliberately misread what I have said. This in order to trash my efforts to get JUSTICE.  I am not blaming Buckland as he has just gone to an arm of the MOJ, namely the Courts and Tribunals Service and given them the documents that it seems Tobias has forwarded to him. Now I wrote several long letters to Tobias, namely on the 30th July,1st Sept, and 20th Sept giving him the background to my complaint. This was so he could understand how I got to the point where I had to resort to coming to him, as I had got nowhere. I did not give him those background letters just for him to pass onto the very people I had in the past, used to try to get somewhere and just got nowhere. Plus I had asked him ONLY to approach the MOJ and the GLD to ask why they had refused to act. The MOJ saying they had no jurisdiction and the GLD refusing to answer three simple questions.

What I am trying to do now, after having tried all the other avenues and got nowhere with all of them lying and deliberately twisting the facts, so they could use excuses to do nothing, is to find out who exactly was responsible for employing this Barrister at that time in question. Then to approach them asking them to investigate the criminal actions of that Barrister, and that is why I approached the MOJ and then the GLD and got the same old lies and excuses, hence my coming to Tobias after the Parl-Ombudsman protected them .... as is usual for that shower.

I could go paragraph by paragraph and destroy everythingthat Buckland has said. What he did say was fed him him by Collins no doubt and that devious civil servant did the same to me last year when I wrote to Gauke when he was Justice Minister.  I could show Tobias the letter he sent me, it was exactly the same old bunch of lies that he has given Buckland.  I will not do that as it would take too long and would no doubt do your head in.  In any case, it is irrelevant as what I had asked Tobias to do as I've said, is only to ask the MOJ and the GLD, the questions l'd outlined.

Now I have to ask this: Has Tobias actually read the full history as given him?? IE the transcript I sent him plus the legal opinion on that, that I also sent, along with a long.description of the background and all sent in the email of the 3rd Sept. Quite a lot to take in, but essential if he is to understand what actually went on. Now you see, I know that Tobias will not have understood all I sent him and that is why I need to have a face to face with him so he can ask questions and I can reply to them. But all this is not anything to do with all that Buckland has said in that letter of his,  BUT IT IS TO DO WITH THE CRIMINAL ACTIONS OF HOBBS QC IN A MEETING,  NOT ANY COURT CASE HEARING OR EVEN ANY TRIBUNAL HEARING.

You see, as I have already said, the UK Justice System simply does not want to admit that what went on at that MEETING was 'illegal and criminal'. Can you imagine what their reaction would be if a UK National Newspaper had headlines:-UK top Barrister commits criminal actions that perverted the course of Justice' No they will do anything to prevent that and I wonder if any member of Parliament would  do the came. This is what I am trying to find out. At this moment I am, as I've said, just trying to find out who was responsible for this QC. Then I can go to them and DEMAND that they investigate and if they don't I will expose them, as well as asking Tobias to do something which I know any MP can do as I have seen good MP's do exactly that for their constituents.

So my question is; Am I going to be able to talk with Tobias or am I going to be refused again and put in a postion that, I seem to be talking to a BRICK WALL. For you have not asked any questions that I have directly asked you recently and that shows that you are not dealing with this situation. That shows me that contrary to what you told me, that you can deal with this case etc, etc, that is incorrect.  In any case the subject matter as I have said in long and involved and I am quite sure you have not read it all or even if you have, have you understood it all?  That should mean that you would ask me questions so you could understand 100%.  But that has'nt happened ..... has it? So I am thinking you are not fully dealing with this and I am quite sure Tobias hasn't read everything or understood what is really going on.

SO I WOULD BE GRATEFUL IF YOU WOULD ANSWER MY MY QUERIES AND POINTS

NO ANSWER TO ANY OF THE ABOVE...TOTALLY IGNORED AND PAR FOR THE COURSE

Re my case
From:   ken cook (sailerboy63@yahoo.co.uk}
To:        megan.gittoes@parliament.uk
Date:    Sunday, 20 October 2019,17:59 BST
https://mail.ychoo.com/d/folders/30

Both you and Liz have said in the past you will help me. However you passed me onto Liz and I over the past few weeks have sent her several emails in which I have asked questions, yet have received NO ANSWERS TO THEM. That does not please me at all, since you said you would help me. Lizz forwarded a copy of the reply from Buckland QC. Yet I told Liz that what he said had nothing to do with what l'd asked Tobias to look into, namely why did the Parliamentary Ombudsman do nothing when I asked it to look into why the MOJ did nothing` Also why did the GLD refuse to answer a few simple questions.
Previously I had written to Mrs May (Remember, she was then the PM) outlining the whole of my case and telling her that I was being refused JUSTICE. She or her staff, merely fobbed it all off by sending my letter of request to the HM Courts (quite why, as they had nothing to do with anything re my complaint) So the letter a bloke called Collins from that department and was about what I was sent by Guake (the Justice Minister for 5 minutes) in 2018, and contained endless nonsense that had absolutely nothing to do with the original letter sent to Mrs May (who had one of her minions pass it onto Guake). As I have told you, I sent him a stiff letter in reply to his rubbish points and as is normal I got no reply, So Buckland has done some sniffing around and has come up with all that, but it positively has nothing to do with what I asked Tobias to look into...DO YOU FOLLOW ALL THAT ??

MAYBE LIZ HAS FAILED TO ANSWER MY QUESTIONS AS SHE THINKS THAT THAT LETTER YOU ALL GOT FROM BUCKLAND, PUTS AN END TO IT ALL, SO GOOD BYE MR COOK-CASE SOLVED AND FINISHED  !!  ABSOLUTELY NOT THE CASE.
 
The Buckland letter and the Collins letter are symptomatic of what I have had to put up with for years now.   
Incompetent government departments that have messed me about for years now, plus some civil servants who have DELIBERATELY said they could do nothing, because they could not intervene or comment on what went on in a COURT CASE .......when I was never involved in one ! They are either damn stupid or they have deliberately misread all that I have said in order to reach a decision whereby they had a excuse to get rid of me and my request that I should receive an investigation into the deliberate actions of Hobbs QC, designed to pervert the course of justice and divest me of my Intellectual Property, which then had the effect of ruining my business, my health and life etc.
So my question is this: Are you going to stand by your PROMISE to see that I get justice via the help of my MP????????? I WOULD LIKE ANSWER SOONER RATHER THAN LATER AS ALL THAT HAS HAPPENED TO DATE IS NOTHING.
Regards,
Ken Cook.





From:   elizabeth.mahon@parliament.uk
To:        sailerboy63@yahoo.co.uk
Date:    Tuesday, 22 October 2019,16:45 BST
https://mail.yal]oo.com/d/folders/30
Dear Mr Cook,
I understand you have been in contact with Megan regarding your case.
I would like to give you an update. Tobias has written to the GLD and explained to them that you would like to know why they will not investigate your case. Of course we will let you know once we have received a response from them. We allow 20 working days before chasing for a response if we have not received one by then. This is due to the volume Of comespondence they receive.
You have received  the position of the Ministry of justice. |
 
Regarding the decision of the Parliamentary Ombudsman. I do understand that you believe they have made an incorrect decision. Their decision is final and their is no automatic right to a review. If you think that they have made the wrong decision then it is for you to go back to the caseworker who handled your case and show: -
What you think they got wrong in reaching their decision. - 
Why you think this would make a difference to their decision. - 
What you would like them to do to resolve your complaint they have not already done. It is for your caseworker to look into this.

Kind regards,
Lizzy Mahon

** This email just highlights what this Bizzy Lizzy bird is all about, as is Tobias.
It also once again, shows that none of them have read any of the long descriptions I have given them as to what my case and complaints are about. Had they done so they would not be making the remarks about what I should do re the Parliamentary Ombudsman failing to do anything and how they like all the other government departments, just misrepresent your case facts-all in order to lie and fob you off. *******

** Note she completely ignores what I said in my email to Gittoes**

From:   ken cook (sailerboy63@yahoo.co.uk)
To:        elizabeth.mahon@parliament.uk
Date:    Wednesday, 23 October 2019,16:56 BST

Hi,

Thank you for your reply. However I feel that you are not dealing with the questions I have asked since started in September,I  asked you a number of questions re the Parliamentary Ombudsman, the GLDand MOJ.
The fact is that you have not answered most of the questions I have asked you in my emails of 20th Sept/30th Sept/10th Oct/ 2Oth Oct and this despite my pointing this out to you several times.

The question I asked Tobias to get an answer on from the MOJ has not been answered despite you telling me it has-in the letter to Tobias, that Buckland sent him.
The question I asked Tobias to get an answer on re the GLD has not been answered at all.
The question I asked re the Parliamentary Ombudsman has also not been answered and this despite  you telling me in your email that on the one hand their decision is final, yet then you say I should go back to the case worker etc. This is tantamount to you thinking I am stupid and did not know that I should do all that you stated. I DID ALL YOU STATED AND GOT NOWHERE AS USUAL. HENCE WHY I ASKED TOBIAS TO ASK THEM QUESTIONS AS TO THEIR ACTIONS.
The Parl/Oms are a racket as they are set up to never actually carry out honest investigations that complainants bring to them. I have experienced this with them on every case I have sent them. IT IS A FACT THAT EVEN THE PRESS HAVE WRIITEN ABOUT AND I BELIEVE ONLY 3% EVER GET AN HONEST OUTCOME. It is outrageous that even when you show them that they have either not understood the facts of your complaint, they just shut you up by saying case closed-it's final...GO AWAY.  Tobias should understand this and be asking them why they think they can do this in order to shut down somone and the complaint against a government department. They absolutely failed to get any answer from the GLD or the MOJ and I complained and got nowhere--THAT IS WHY I WAS FORCED TO HAVE TO COME TO TOBIAS !!!

The same is happening with you because I am sending you emails in which I state what it is all about that I wish Tobias to investigate and I am forced to have to deal with a third party by emails, instead of me having a meeting face to face with Tobias when I could get across to him all the facts and how he could help, He would be able to ask me questions on those facts and in the end I would be able to know that he fully understood all that I would have been able to tell him. I know from much experience that trying to get across to a civil servant important facts is absolutely hopeless-by emails or letters. No doubt you are overloaded with work so that you simply do not take the time to READ ALL that I have sent you and Tobias.  It ends up being a quick skim read and most of it does not get read or fully understood. That cannot happen in a proper meeting face to face, But of course I am a BANNED person to do this because I had the temerity to complain strongl;y to Tobias because he had utterly failed to stand up for me in a very important case. AND SO I AM NOW SEEING A SIMILAR SITUATION IN THIS CASE. TOBIAS SHOULD BE INTO THIS CASE OF A HIGH' UP BARRISTER PERVERTING TO COURSE OF JUSTICE -BY A CRIMINAL ACT.  OR IS IT ANOTHER CASE OF A MEMBER OF THE ESTABLISHMENT (TOBIAS) BEING RELUCTANT TO ACT AGAINST ONE OF HIS OWN??
I cannot beleive that in such an important case, where a barrister no less, has driven a coach and horses right through our justice system and made a mockery of it and so far, because I have no money to take him to court, rather than trying to get civil servants to do this or my MP and give me justice, he is getting away with it. WHAT IS IT GOING TO BE?? Are you going to answer all of the questions you have ignored in all the previous emails?? I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW. IS TOBIAS GOING TO STAND UP FOR ME??
Regards,
Ken Cook. 

From:   Tobias Ellwood (tobias.ellwood,mp@parliament.uk)
To:        sailerboy63@yahoo.co.uk
Date:   Wednesday, 30 October 2019,15:34 GMT

Dear Mr Cook,                                                                                           
Thank you for your email, I understand you are not satisfied with how we have tried to assist you.    `
Firstly, I would like to assure you that every action that Tobias has taken regarding your case has been taken with nothing but good faith with his sole aim being to assist you.
Tobias wrote to the Ministry Of Justice and asked them, on your behalf, why they would not investigate your case. You have specifically said that Tobias should have asked why they refuse to investigate, which is why he has taken this action.

Regarding the Parliamentary Ombudsman, we have advised you that there is a reason why cases are taken to them which is to get a final decision on whether or not a government department has acted appropriately. The Parliamentary Ombudsman decided that they could see no evidence that anything went seriously wrong when the GLD addressed your complaint. I appreciate that you have already read this for ourself and disagree and as you know, you must go back to the Caseworker from the Parliamentary Ombudsman to address this with him.

Regarding the GLD, we are currently waiting from a response from them. Tobias has asked them whv they will not investigate.

Tobias' role regarding his constituents is to support and advise them were possible. He does not have the authority or capacity to force any person or department undertake actions solely at his request.
I also understand that you still wish to meet with Tobias. The decision has been made that we are not Happy for you to have a surgery appointment wth Tobias and the reasoning for this has been made very clear to you. Our decision on this will not change. I would encourage you to email any further information which you would like Tobias to see, if you believe there is anything else.
I will of course come back to you as soon as we have received a response from the GLD.

Kind regards,
Lizzy
Lizzy Mahon
Parliamentary Assistant Office Of Rt,  Hon.Tobias Ellwood -MP

******************** NOTE This wretched lying woman has  no qualms saying what she has (I've underlined her lies) It is quite obvious that both her and Tobias had no intention of helping me........ only to pretend they were. Similarly when she lies that an MP has no authority etc, when it is common knowledge that a caring MP can and do ask departments awkward questions regarding their lack of actions etc. I see this in the media and see MP's getting up in Parliament and bringing up subjects where their constituents are being trashed by some gov-department department. As far as Ellwood is concerned he and his staff are quite happy to lie through their back teeth about what he can do.*******************

LET US BE CLEAR HERE..TOBIAS DOES NOT WANT TO STICK HIS NECK OUT AND GET ANY SORT OF BAD REPUTATION FOR ASKING AWKWARD QUESTIONS ETC

From:   ken cook (sailerboy63@yahoo.co.uk)
To:        elizabeth,mahon@parliament.uk
Date:   Thursday, 31 October 2019,10:13 GMT

Thank you for that, There are errors in it, but due to what has now happened in Parliament with an election now going to happen, I believe it will be a waste of my time to reply and show the many times I have not had questions answered and so on. I mean you and your office and Tobias may not even be in existence after the election. Tobias isn't exactly loved in Bournemouth and if he isn't re-elected, well there you go. Both he and his office will have more to do up to the election, so I will leave it. Or course if you ever do get replies from the Parl Oms and the MOJ I would expect you to pass them on.
However there is one question you could give me an answer on. That is, in your email to me on the 20th Sept you said Tobias had asked Buckland to ask the MOJ,  why they said they had no jurisdiction to investigate what Hobbs QC had done. Now I did ask you straight away, at what date that was and you have never answered that. I would like to know now. Similarly in the same email you said Tobias had asked the Parl Ombudsman for an update, Again I asked at what date did he ask and you have also never answered. I need to know that too.
On both of those questions he asked-it is well over any days requirement they should have to answer and you did say it is 20 days. So why no answers from them both?
I would be obliged to receive an answer to those two questions, in case I have to deal with someone else after the election.  If not you will again hear from me with a list of questions. Have a nice time re the election.
Regards,
Ken Cook.

NOTE the above was never answered to...AS USUAL AND IT AGAIN SHOWS POSHBOY TOBIAS AND HIS EQUALLY BAD MANNERED OFFICE GIRL - GIVE NO COMMENTS OR ANSWERS. THIS IS WHAT I'M UP AGAINST AS YOU WILL SEE AHEAD.

****Note due to the pending election I did not push for answers to all the questions I had asked to be answered and I would again approach them after it.*****

*******IF YOU THOROUGHLY READ THE FOLLOWING EMAILS...YOU WILL SEE HOW WHEN I'VE BACKED THEM INTO A CORNER, THEY REACT BY REFUSING TO CARRY ON WITH THEIR PRETENCE  OF 'HELPING ME' AND REQUIRE THAT I DISAPPEAR 




From: ken cook Date: Wednesday,13 November 2019 at 10:14 
To: "MAHON, Elizabeth"  
Subject: A history of not answering my questions:

Plus numerous other failures. You have obviously thought that Buckland had answered my questions re the MOJ and my answer to you on the 10th Oct, seems to have gone right over your head as you made no comments on what I had said about his reply. Also he never answered my question, which Tobias also asked MOJ and that was. 'why did they say they had no jurisdiction" this to ask a barrister about his Criminal acts AND INVESTIGATE ALL THAT? Now you must have read all the letters and documents I sent Tobias on the 307/19 ??.  He made no comments on anything and that raises the question of: 'did he read any of it' and most importantly of all, did he understand what had been done to me? Most MP's would acknowledge receipt and make their comments of what was in any documents and their etc. Also most MP's would when they have contacted as in this case, a government department, they would send me a copy of the letter the MP had sent that department. Certainly Mr Chope MP, did. I definitely need to see what Tobias has asked, so I can be fully aware that the RIGHT questions were asked and if they were wrong questions, I could then correct that.  That did not happen and despite me asking you several times: what date did he send that? you never gave an answer.
Similarly you have said that Tobias has contacted the GLD, but again, no copy of the letter and all that has happened is 'Silence' from them. The time that has elapsed since then, should mean you chasing them.
I am not going to go over every email I have sent you to pick out all the questions I have asked you, which you have for whatever reason, not answered, despite all your assurances of helping me etc. So far, going on what evidence I  have, all Tobias has done is act like a postman. This is what he has always done. He never gets into the facts and evidence given him, by getting back to you and meeting you to go over all the facts and evidence  AND telling you what and how he can help. You have commented that he cannot 'investigate' I would take issue with that as I have seen many MP's investigate cases of wrong doing brought to them. Not just sending the culprit department a copy of the constituents letter and saying 'Give me an answer on that'. If he is fully boned up on ALL of the evidence in that case, when he gets an answer he will know all the lies and non answers and every
trick in the book being carried out. Then he has the authority to question all that ..... I've seen it done. But then it is only done by decent MP's who give a fig about their constituents, especially when they are poor and cannot fight the whole of the UK Justice System covering up their corrupt actions, as I am trying to do. So far I am not seeing any of that and its now some months and I am nowhere.
Forget the Ombudsman and what happened to me with them. They as I've said are utterly useless and I know they will NEVER admit to anything and they are anyway, not central to what js really going on. It would be nice if YOU went over every email I've sent and pick out the questions l've asked ..... AND ANSWER THEM.
I've picked up this case again, as what is going on with the election and Brexit, it seems that Tobias may be re-elected. That means that his office and you will in the weeks ahead, be still be operating. I know that means you may be very busy. However please do what you can.
Regards,
Ken Cook.

***************THIS TRUE TO FORM WAS NEVER ANSWERED*********************

From: ken cook Sent: 3 January 2020 17:29
To: MAHON, Elizabeth
Subject: Ref Case TE10176
Fwd to Tobias Eltwood MP.

When I last contacted you I said that due to the election I would leave it until that was over. So here I am back to you in the New Year and with Tobias again ensconced in  his constituency that I live in.

I got in contact with Tobias last year around April time` I reminded him that on his website he states that a he is ex Forces he specialises in Veterans' so I being a Vet myself, I would expect him to keep to his claim. Since then you have claimed that I in the past had abused Mr Eltwood, but you have not shown evidence that I have and only showed a letter I sent him years ago, COMPLAINING that in a important case where a PC had perverted the course of Justice and he had failed to do anything about that.

ln this case which is even graver that the Police case, I have supplied to Tobias`several letters where I have laid out what in this case has gone on and I how I expect him to be able help me and to keep to his promises about how he helps Vets, and how. He has not made any comments; say, acknowledging receipt of same letters or making any requests to supply extra evidence and comments etc from me. Very odd. You have merely stated that some time ago he had indeed approached the MOJ and the GLD. I pointed out to you that normally an MP would send a copy of such letters, but I was not sent any. You ignored my comments on that. You have pointedly not made any comment on the fact that they have seemingly also ignored you. Or maybe they have spoken with you and told you a pack Of lies about me and the case facts` And that obviously has to be covered over by you and you both sit on 'non replying' action, hoping I will go away`

So here I am months later (9 at least) and I am no nearer to being helped by you or T.E. The letter you  gave me some time gao from a Mr Buckland was not a reply from the MoJ or the GLD and I told you why, yet no comment from you. This is all repeating how Tobias and his office failed me then, firstly over a P.Constable perverting the course of justice and nothing happening about that - hence my frustrated letter of complaint, you and he have taken indignant offence to and are using it to again deny me help, this time around?

My question now is, what are you/Tobias going to do if anything, about the fact that as I told you, both the GLD and the MOJ are refusing to investigate one of their own, namely a QC. Plus ignoring yourselves. Are you and they just going to refuse to say or do anything, in the. hope I will go away? All this in the knowledge that they know I am skint, because of them and their actions, so they also know I cannot escalate this all to the High Court.

However I know that Tobias could easily take all this up, face to face wth the Justice Minister. He is also able to bring it to the attention of Parliament and ask in the house why a QC is able to dodge justice in the way he has and over a very important point. Which is 'Do we in the UK have a truly clean justice system as is boasted about all the time, or can members of the justice system gct away with perverting the course of justice, with impunity' ?

In the run up to the election Boris boasted this: "Judges are the great glories of the Constitution"   (HOBBS QC sits as a Judge) I had a good laugh at that, because this is what we are always being brainwashed  about, with lies. For the UK Justice System is thoroughly corrupt throughout and I have endless documentary evidence of that fact.

Due to the election I have lost time again, so I now would ask you to kindly furnish me with answers to all of the above and as soon as possible.

Kind Regards,
Ken Cook.

       ***************NO ANSWERS OR COMMENTS-AS USUAL ******************

From:   Elizabeth.mahon@ parliament.uk (elizabeth.mahon@ parliament.uk)
To:        sailerboy63@yahoo.co.uk
Date:   Tuesday, 7 January 2020,15:10 GMT

Dear Mr Cook,        
As per your request, (of 3/1/20) please find attached the original letter Tobias sent to the Ministry of Justice and their response, and also the response from the GLD. Below is the original email sent to the GLD.

Tobias has written to the departments/people you have asked him to contact regarding your case, and this has now all been sent to you.

As you will see, the GLD state that Mr Hobbs QC was not an employee of GLD nor was he supplied by them to the IPO.

As you know, the recommendation of the Robert Buckland QC, the Secretary of State for Justice, was if you wish to complain about the conduct of court staff, you should complain directly to the court, if you have not done so already. You can also complain about the barrister to the Bar Standards Board. I apologise if you have already taken these steps and I am not aware.

Kind regards,
Lizzy
Lizzy Nahon
Parliamentary Assistant Office of Rt` Hon.  

**This email just shows you very clearly that this woman and Tobias have not read any of the copies of evidence I have sent them !! WHAT A KICK IN THE TEETH THAT IS !!
For what she is saying is that despite me covering all of the comments she makes. this shows how she has just again supplied me with the alleged comments of the MoJ and the GLD which simply do not deal with the complaints I made to them both. They are merely repeating their lies in those alleged replies and Tobias should have been asking why they have lied. This is especially seen in what she says about the letter Buckland sent, for I made my comments on that to her some time ago and showed that what he was saying had nothing to do with my original complaint about their refusal to investigate Hobbs.
Also I had shown the letter the IPO sent me that clearly said the GLD did supply them with Appointed Persons.

Here is copy of the letter Tobias sent to the GLD :-

I have been contacted by the above named constituent who has been in contact with me regarding a complaint he has about a 'top IP barrister'.

I have attached  some of the correspondence I have received from Mr Cook on this matter. Mr Cook has requested that I ask you why the GLD will not investigate this case.

I would appreciate it if you could please get back to me on this in order that I can best advise my       constituent.

Kind regards,
Tobias
Rt. Hon. Tobias Ellwood Member Of Parliament for Boumemouth East

*********************************************************************************

************NOTE THAT HE REALLY PUT HIMSELF OUT IN THIS SHORT LETTER.
HE MUST HAVE TIRED HIMSELF NO END.....BUT IT SHOWS THAT HE ISN'T MAKING ANY EFFORT TO GET REAL ANSWERS TO ALL THE POINTS AND QUESTIONS I HAD ASKED ABOUT THE MOJ FAILING ME.  PLUS EXACTLY WHAT LETTERS OF MINE DID HE SEND THEM??? ANY DECENT MP WOULD HAVE TOLD ME THIS. OF COURSE HE IS ONLY GOING THROUGH THE MOTIONS. AND IT MUST BE NOTED THAT THE GLD IGNORED THIS LETTER AND NEVER GAVE HIM NOR ME ANY ANSWERS OTHER THAN TO CLAIM THEY HAD ALREADY ANSWERED THEM. IF YOU LOOK AT THE BACK COPIES IN THIS BLOG YOU WILL SEE THEY SIMPLY REFUSE TO ANSWER MY QUESTIONS AS TO WHO EMPLOYED HOBBS....THEY JUST SAID THEY DID NOT EMPLOY HIM-NOR DID THEY SAY WHO DID AND THEY POINT BLANK STATED THEY HAVE NEVER SUPPLIED APPOINTED PERSONS TO THE IPO AND THIS DESPITE THE EMAIL FROM THE IPO TO ME WHICH CLEARLY STATED THE IPO GOT A/P's FROM THE GLD.

THIS IS THE EXACT KIND OF LIES AND DESPICABLE BEHAVIOUR OF THE MOJ AND THE GLD WHO ARE BOTH UP TO THIER NECKS IN LIES AND CORRUPTNESS.

*******************************************************************************

From:   ken cook (sailerboy63@yahoo.co.uk)
To:        elizabeth.mahon@parliament.uk
Date:    Friday,10January 2020,17:21  GMT

As I feared unfortunately your answer fails to deal with what I have asked you to do for me. Once again all this is down to you and Ellwood refusing to meet with me and to take whatever time needs be, to go over all the FACTS of what I have asked to GLD and the MOJ to investigate. That way I would be able to show Tobias all the documents and whatever replies I got to each one, and then to show Tobias how non of my questions and claims were dealt with. Show all the lies, obfuscations, the twisting of the facts to show that my facts were all wrong and so on. All that done in typical civil service ways in order to rubbish everything I claim and accuse the perpetrater, one Hobbs QC of doing.

By sending you the documentary evidence mostly on emails, I am unable to ascertain if whoever read them (you or Tobias) actually did read all of them and did UNDERSTAND all the FACTS.  I have to spend as I am now, time to write out more email replies, collate more documents to show you and then wait for you to reply ..... only to see that you make no mention of the evidence l've sent, let alone understood it all. Then I have to do as I am doing now ..... have another go at getting you to understand/answer a few questions ( mostly they are all ignored as I have told you ad nauseum) and so on.  I first approached Tobias in April LAST YEAR ......... and here I am absolutely no further on!! All this despite you telling me more than once, that both you and Tobias wish to help me.  I will put together all the documents you will need to see and with my comments and explanations. These will show you just what the GLD and then the MOJ have been up to, so you then cannot claim you never understood the facts.

I will also comment on the two copies of Tobias's letters to the MOJ and the GLD that are incorrectly worded and thus have given the recipients an incorrect impression of EXACTLY what I am complaining about.  I have already sent you an email reply re the Buckland reply, which was on behalf of the MOJ, given you a full explanation as to the rubbish he came out with. You ignored that and that was months ago. Now I have to repeat myself, thus more time wasted.

So I will do that over the next few days and will send them to you via recorded delivery, (so you cannot say you never got them) Plus I have to say that I am nearly at the end of the road with Tobias Ellwood and if this latest effort I am making, is blocked once again, by seemingly you not understanding the FACTS and once more I get fobbed off,  I will be taking it all to a place that if I am successful, you will positively hate the outcome,  It will show that I, like so many members of the British Public, we cannot get our MP's to take up cases where the British Justice System and all those in it  (The Establishment) just wish to kick it all under the carpet. Knowing that because they have now denied almost all people, Legal Aid, that effectively means we cannot get it into court let alone get JUSTICE. But even if we could, this case is one where a Barrister QC who is also a Judge, so I cannot believe they would not all stand behind him and cover up for his crimes as has been happening to me all along in my quest to get departments who are responsible for this man to act. (This has happened just this week, where a British Judge let off another Judge who had committed crimes. Plus our laughable and utterly useless Police will not touch this with a barge pole and are in any case, too thick to understand the facts.)


Regards,
Ken Cook.
                                ****************************************
The following is the inevitable reply I got from His Majesty Tobias the greasy pole climber par excellence Ellwood. MP.

THE RT. HON. TOBIAS  ELLWOOD MP
HOUSE  OF  COMMONS LONDON  SWIA  0AA
Mr Ken Cook

14 January 2020

lt is with regret that I have decided  I must write to you to end our communication from here on out due to the recent threatening communication you have sent towards my staff.

Over the past few years my office has received rude and threatening emails from you on several occasions and you have previously had to be reminded of my zero tolerance policy towards threatening and abusive language.

I and my staff have tried to assist you as we do with all constituents,  however I am afraid we have now reached a point where we can longer cooperate

Regards ** Note-the underlining is his !!

1st note is:- HE STATES SEVERAL OCCASIONS HE HAS RECEIVED RUDE AND THREATENING EMAILS. SO HE IS PREPARED LIKE HIS FELLOW CIVIL SERVANTS TO LIE. AS EVEN WHEN I HAVE ASKED HIM TO SEND ME COPIES OF THESE EMAILS...NONE HAVE BEEN FORTHCOMING. Well they are all in this blog in recent posts so you can see for yourself what a damn liar he is. I suppose this is what all those Public Schools teach their Brats.... How to be excellent shysters and liars in order to get to the top !!

2nd Note...He says that he or his staff have on several occasions, previously, had to remind me of his zero policy etc, etc. THIS IS AN OUTRIGHT LIE AS ONLY ONCE HAS HE DONE THAT AND THAT SO CALLED EMAIL IS THERE FOR YOU TO SEE FOR YOURSELF.

3RD NOTE:- You should read my last letter sent on the 10th January 2020. (ABOVE) It is to the point but I do not think any honest person could say that I have been ABUSIVE OR THREATENING AND DEFINITELY NO SWEARING. This is exactly the type of thing now that ALL employees of the State, no matter what department we deal with, is what they use to get rid of you when you absolutely refuse to give in to their lies and every dirty tactic they use to not actually deal with whatever it is you are complaining about. When you get them with their backs to the wall and they know you have them by the curlies, they accuse you of swearing/abusing them and so on. IT MAKES MY BLOOD BOIL BECAUSE THESE UTTER BASTARDS ARE PAID BY THE TAXPAYERS TO SERVE US AND WHAT DO WE GET FROM THEM ??? AND IF YOU DARE TO COMPLAIN AND SHOW YOU WILL NOT BACK DOWN TO THEIR DISGUSTING LIES AND TACTICS, THIS IS WHAT THEY RESORT TO...AND THEY GENERALLY GET AWAY WITH IT. 

I SHOULD POINT OUT TO YOU WHEN IN APRIL LAST WHEN I DECIDED TO TRY TO GET POSHBOY ELLWOOD TO TAKE ALL THIS UP, I KNEW WHAT THE OUTCOME WOULD BE. FOR TWICE SINCE THE WRETCH WANGLED HIS WAY INTO PARLIAMENT - NO DOUBT WITH HELP FROM FELLOW ESTABLISHMENT JOHNNIES SOME IN THE TORY PARTY WHO PARACHUTED HIM INTO A SAFE CONSTITUENCY. (MAYBE LIKE DADDY ETC) HE HAS CARRIED OUT EXACTLY THE SAME BEHAVIOUR. WHERE HE ABSOLUTELY DOES NOTHING FOR HIS CONSTITUENTS-SO THAT IS WHY I WENT AHEAD WITH THIS FRUITLESS EXERCISE, AS I WANTED HIM TO BEHAVE AS I KNEW HE WOULD.....AND HE DIDN'T LET ME DOWN AND AS I DESPISE THE POSH UPPER CLASS BASTARDS IN OUR ESTABLISHMENT... LIKE HIM, WHO PROLIFERATE IN PARLIAMENT, I DECIDED THAT IF I COULD LAST OUT HEALTHWISE, UNTIL THE EXCERISE WAS FINISHED, THEN I COULD EXPOSE IT ALL....IT WAS WORTH CARRYING OUT. HAPPILY I AM STILL IN QUITE GOOD NICK SO STILL AROUND AND HAVE OODLES OF SPARE TIME FOR DOING THIS- IT KEEPS MY BRAIN IN TRIM. MIND YOU I AM NOT FINISHED YET AS THERE ARE CERTAIN MORE AVENUES I HAVE YET TO GO DOWN,TO EXPOSE IT FURTHER !!!!!!!!

*******************************************************************************
THE FOLLOWING IS A COPY OF THE LETTER THAT I HAVE BEEN FORCED TO HAVE TO SEND TO BUCKLAND, SEEING THAT ELLWOOD HAS THROWN THE TOWEL IN. BUT WILL HE EVEN GET IT, LET ALONE REPLY TO IT, LET ALONE ADDRESS THE THINGS IN IT??

Robert Buckland MP,
Secretary of State for Justice, 
Ministry of Justice,
102, Petty France, 
London, SWIH 9AJ.

12/2/2010.

Dear Mr Buckland,

CRIMINAL ACTIONS PERPETRATED BY BARRISTER HOBBS QC, WHILST ACTING 
              AS AN  APPOINTED PERSON AT A BOGUS IPO APPEAL HEARING.

I am being forced to send you this letter because the letter you sent me via Tobias Ellwood my MP, dated the 7th October 201, showed me that either Mr Ellwood fed you information that was totally incorrect, or more likely, someone in the MOJ has deliberately fed you a dortored account in order to get you to write a reply, to fob me off. Mr Ellwood knew what the correct facts were, as I gave him documents showing them all-A TRANSCRIPT AND A BARRISTERS OPINION DOCUMENT ON ALL THE UNLAWFUL ACTS COMMITTED BY HOBBS PLUS A BRIEF RUNDOWN  ON THE RELEVANT FACTS. For what you have said bears absolutely no relation to the true facts. I am determined that you will see the true facts, so at this stage I will just comment on the inaccuracies of all that you said in your letter. If you tell me that you will investigate what the MOJ and the GLD have failed to do, plus the acts of Hobbs, I will send you the full facts and copies of the backing, irrefutable documentary evidence.

After wasting 9 months of my time during which E]lwood in effect achieved nothing, he has seen fit to engineer excuses to now tell me that he refuses to handle my requests for answers, despite initial promises he would. This by accusing me of abusing and threatening him, but he has not supplied me with any evidence of this, despite my asking for that.

I would hope that you, especially after recent remarks you have made to newspapers about the justice system in the UK, will have the decency to look into my complaints. For all the departments that you are responsible for have over the years since 2010, denied me JUSTICE, again and again, by lying on a grand scale. Their behaviour and willingness to brush serious criminal behaviour by one of their own, under the carpet, is absolutely outrageous. I am determined to expose all this if you carry on the sane way. What has happened to me has driven a coach and horses right through the UK Justice System and makes a mockery of off repeated statements like those made by you and other politicians. Like the recent one made by a Tory MP that we in the UK have the best Justice System in the world- what a sick joke. Today it is an absolute shambles as you well know and because of what it has been done to me, I now know it-is full of corruption too.

I will now, paragraph by paragraph, comment on all the statements you made in that letter that bore no relationship to the complaint I had made to the GLD and the MOJ, starting at the end of 2018. I have numbered the paragraphs so you can easily identify my comments. The first mistake you made is in the heading - "COURT CASE", because there was NO COURT CASE and you repeated that mistake in Para 1 by saying "about his 'court case."- I did not have a court case !!!

Para 2. You say "He is unhappy with the handling of his case" and "court staff at the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court based at the Royal Courts of Justice" 

THE TRUE FACTS: All my complaints have been about what went on at an alleged Tribunal Hearing held in the IPO's London Office situated in Bouverie St and in 2006. Even though what was supposed to be discussed at this `alleged' Appeal, concerned a Trade Mark registered to me. The `alleged appeal' was brought about by my ex London business agent and was officiated by a barrister (Hobbs QC) acting as an `Appointed Person'. He was supplied by the Treasury Solicitors/GLD (who deny they supply A/P's to the IPO-one of many lies confirming this fact) You must note that I was refused attendance at this hearing even though it discussed matters that were about a Trade Mark registered to me !  That was unlawful, as was what the IPO did, after the event.

Para 3. The whole of this paragraph is totally inapplicable, because no appeal hearing actually took place as IT WAS DROPPED !! So no decision of any sort for you to comment on, nor any decision I could appeal! ! ! (which in any case, would one be able to appeal a decision made in an alleged hearing, one never took part in???) My Trade Mark was eventually taken from me in 2010 (unlawfully) and what went on at this bogus appeal hearing was responsible for that eventuality. Thus making it a `pivotal point' in my battle for justice. I call the hearing, bogus, as what it was IN FACT, was no more than a cosy meeting between my ex agent, Hobbs QC and Mr James, a law officer from the IPO, where they discussed how Busbridge, my ex agent, could circumvent a previous hearing (By a Mr Landau) which went against him and this meant I had won that hearing. The transcript of that bogus appeal hearing shows that Hobbs unlawfully gave Busbridge legal advice (46 pages of it) as to how he could circumvent that judgement that went against him. And he made scathing remarks about me when I was not in a position to defend myself. THIS IS ALL UNLAWFUL.

Para 4. The whole of this paragraph is yet another is a prime example of the unmitigated chicanery and blatant lies that I've had to endure coming from from EVERY justice department I've been forced to have to turn to. The whole of Mr Collins letter is a farrago of lies and he constantly makes statements he knows are lies. He had the true facts, because I had given the true facts to Mr Guake. Once again he knew TIHERE HAD BEEN NO DECISION and he knew that I had no money to take anything to any Court, especially the HIGH COURT. Hence why I wrote to Mrs May and then to Mr Gauke. I replied to Mr Collins dreadful letter, full of garbage and lies, with none of it remotely to do with what I had complained about. I completely demolished his letter by stating all the mistakes that amounted to deliberate lies and I gave him the true facts. Needless to say Mr Collins did not even reply, hence why I wrote to Mrs May and then to Mr Gauke.

Para 5. Given what I have told you above, it is clear that all that you said in this paragraph is simply inapplicable and is so far from what actually happened that I wonder how you could have written it. You haven't seen that I only went to the PHSO AFTER the MOJ had acted in exactly the same way as every justice department and manager within them had, that I had gone to. This by lying, twisting the facts to read a different story, passing the buck onto yet another department, sweeping it under the carpet as they don't ever want this to see the light of day. In effect treating me like I was an idiot that couldn't see what they were up to. Which was and is; to get rid of my request to investigate the criminal acts of one of their own. It is as bad as the Police investigating the Police or solicitors investigating themselves and so on. Are you going to carry on this cover up ?

Paras 6 & 7  These show again, that either you were never given all the documents containing the FACTS or you chose to ignore them. For I had, in the documents given to Tobias Ellwood, explained that since 2007 I had gone to EVERY entity in the justice system with my case and my complaints and given the TRUE FACTS and this obviously has taken years to do, due to how slow every one is. So it follows that all the suggestions you gave for me to take note of, had long ago already been done. Of course all the outcomes have been the same. Namely outright refusals to look into the case, denials that they were the correct people to approach, lies on a monumental scale and so on. All that OBVIOUSLY took years and meant that in the end I had to approach the GLD, the MOJ, and various Ministers including the PM Mrs May, but the outcomes were always the same. Brush it under the carpet, deny everything as he's probably too stupid to know what to do and hope he will eventually give up and go away. They picked the wrong person to do this to.

Well I am not stupid, but an intelligent man of 79 who has seen more of the World and business, as an engineer, than most have. So you can take it that I am not going to be fobbed off and WILL get this exposed one way or another, if it is not dealt with. Hobbs QC who has a very high reputation in his field, but what he did puts all that and UK Justice into disrepute AND SHOWS TIHE LEVEL 0F CORRUPTION THAT IS WITHIN IT. You are the last entity on my list, so I look forward to seeing that at least there is someone within the UK Justice world who is honest ..... for a change and you can prove this by stating your willingness to see that what Hobbs QC did, is investigated and he gets what he's due for his criminality. To remind you there is no time limit on investigating criminal acts...this is used as yet another excuse. If you tell me this is what you will do I will then provide you with copies of all the irrefutable documentary evidence, as I've already said.
Yours faithfully,



Ken Cook



********************************************************************************

21/2/20.

PS..This letter was sent via 'Signed For' mail so I know it was received yet 10 days on - not even an acknowledgement that it has been received and will be dealt with in due course. 

SO THE QUESTION IS WHAT ARE THE BETS IT WILL BE IGNORED???