CORRUPT JONATHON JONES EX GLD. 96.

It is some time since I posted but I am still here and COVID has put a stop to trying to get JUSTICE as all our lazy civil servants are sitting at home doing nothing and all our MP's are only talking about Covid and now Brexit. EVERYTHING ELSE IN THE COUNTRY CAN GO TO HELL.

However it is the resignation of that arch liar and corrupt Jones bloke that has prompted this post for the unmitigated crap that he and his admirers have come out with, has been enough to make me want to puke.....what these assholes get away with is BREATH-TAKING - how easy it is to feed the gullable British Public & Media with utter lies. I would IMPLORE you to read all my posts going back at least for TWO YEARS. For they will show you how this fraudulent JONATHON JONES & JUSTICE MINISTER BUCKLAND have behaved towards my efforts to obtain justice over BARRISTER HOBBS QC and his unlawful acts and his perverting the course of justice.

We have Jones putting himself over as a paragon of virtue, whiter than white and therefore unable to stand by while (as he sees it) Boris changes a committment he made last year over the EU and N.Ireland and the borders, which all had to do with Brexit. Saying that would be unlawful etc, etc. IT IS SICKENING, for when you see how he DELIBERATELY ignored all the evidence he was given by me, that one of his fellow members of the Judicial Establishment had committed multiple unlawful acts and had perverted the course of justice. How arrogant and hypocritical can one get???

You will see in the post dated 4th June 2019, the copy of my 'Formal Complaint' to Jones which was 2 1/2 pages long and dated 25th March 2019 and also included 11 supporting copies of relevant evidence documents. What you do not know is that even tho' any government department that receives a 'Formal Complaint' it should be dealt with in a prescribed manner. Jones NEVER did that, but merely sent me a 'Fob Off' reply dated the 1st April 2019 of only 3 short paragraphs (see copy attached). He never dealt with any of my complaints about how his department were 'fobbing me off' over my requests for answers and it was one of his staff, a STEPHEN BROWN that was responsible. So here, he is quite happy to IGNORE the laid down requirements of how he should have dealt with a 'Formal Complaint'.....Yet he is bleating on about how he must resign because Boris is breaking the law so much, so he has to resign. HOW HYPOCRITICAL AND ARROGANT CAN YOU GET???

Then later on in 2019 when I got 'Hero' Ellwood to also tackle him over why he and his department are lying through their back teeth over having any responsibility for Hobbs QC and that had included all the documentary evidence he needed to see what had gone on (Transcript/Barristers opinion/and my explanationary letter). Yet his again, very short reply letter to Ellwood dated 4th Nov 2019, never dealt with ANY of what he had been sent, but merely 'Fobbed' me off, yet again, and  telling me to complain to the JCIO. This when I had said in my letter they along with EVERY other British Justice System department and avenue of complaints, had lied and also fobbed me off. Thus proving he had never read what was sent him. He could have told me or better still got someone in the system to handle this complaint and case. NO, IT WAS YET ANOTHER 'BRUSH IT UNDER THE CARPET' - BRUSH OFF. 

Of course Ellwood utterley failed to laise with me over this brush off which he could see, that is what it was. Didn't want to rock the boat and his trying to get up the greasy pole. IT SHOWS AGAIN WHAT A LIAR AND HYPOCRITE JONES IS. Not only that but Buckland had done exactly the same to me when Ellwood sent him the same complaint of mine and all the same evidence Jones had been sent. ( If you remember I asked Ellwood to deal with both Jones & Buckland) You will see copies of  of all that in previous posts along with my letter to him of the 12th Feb 2020...(See at the end of Post dated 18th Feb 2020) .WHICH PREDICTABLY WENT UNANSWERED.  Thus Buckland who also stuck up for Jones, is AS BIG A LIAR & HYPOCRITE AS JONES IS, and do not forget these two are THE TOP TWO LEGAL PEOPLE IN THE WHOLE OF THE BRITISH JUSTICE SYSTEM.

Copy Jones letter:-

To: Rt Hon Tobias Ellwood MP, House of Commons, London. SWIA 0AA.

From:  Jonathan Jones QC (Hon) Permanent Secretary HM Procurator General & Treasury Solicitor 102 Petty France, London. SWIH 9GL.

4 November 2019.

I am writing in response to your email dated 22 October 2019, Essentially Mr Cook's complaint is about the decision and/or conduct of Mr Hobbs QC whilst sitting as an `Appointed Person' on an appeal from the Intellectual Property Office in 2009. Mr Cook appears to believe that Mr Hobbs QC was an employee of GLD, or that GLD are or were responsible for `supplying' Appointed Persons to the IPO. As we have explained to Mr Cook on more than one occasion, this is not correct as the Ministry of Justice have this responsibility. The appropriate forum for complaints about personal conduct of judicial office holders is the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office - although complaints to that body must ordinarily be made within three months of the matter complained of.

I hope that this of some assistance to you in advising your constituent. 

JONATHAN JONES QC 

***** You should note that when he says I am complaining about the 'DECISION' that Hobbs allegedly made, this shows one of two FACTS. (A) He is lying because!! THERE WAS NO DECISION as the alleged 'Appeal' was dropped on the ADVICE of Hobbs (illegal) SO NO DECISION!! This is the absolute lie that EVERY complaints department and person has made over the past 10 years, in order to trash my complaints. FOR IT GIVES THEM THE RIGHT TO SAY THAT NO DECISION MADE IN A COURT OF LAW CAN BE QUERIED BY THE PEOPLE AND DEPARTMENTS I HAVE BEEN TO......GET IT?? THIS EVEN IS STILL SAID, WHEN I HAVE TOLD THEM AD NAUSEUM THAT 'NO DECISION WAS MADE' !!!......THEY JUST CONVENIENTLY IGNORED ME ON THAT. 

Or (B) he never read the transcript which showed NO DECISION or any of my other evidence stating this. Either way it shows what a disreputable person both Jones and Buckland are. Yet here they are on the public stage day after day spouting their arrogant and hypocritical rhetoric and a fawning MEDIA.

Making themselves out to be paragons of virtue and whiter than white who should be applauded and congratulated. PASS ME THE SICK BAG!!

TO REALLY UNDERSTAND WHAT BUCKLAND AND JONES ARE REALLY ALL ABOUT I IMPLORE YOU READ READ MY POST OF THE 18TH FEB, FOR THERE YOU WILL FIND COPIES OF WHAT JONES SAID TO ME, DENYING RESPONSIBILITY FOR INVESTIGATING HOBBS QC, PLUS WHAT BUCKLAND SAID IN HIS REPLY TO MY ASKING HIM TO ALSO INVESTIGATE THE ACTIONS OF HOBBS AND MY REPLY TO HIM WHICH WAS IGNORED!

YOU WILL ALSO SEE HOW MY EFFORTS TO GET THE EXECRABLE ELLWOOD MP TO DO HIS JOB AND ON BEHALF OF ONE OF HIS CONSTITUENTS. HOW HE MESSED ME ABOUT FOR A YEAR AND THEN IN EFFECT TOLD ME TO 'GO FORTH AND MULTIPLY.'!

THE POST IS LONG AND INVOLVED BUT IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN HOW OUR CORRUPT POLITICIANS AND SO CALLED JUSTICE HIGH-UPS ACTUALLY BEHAVE, YOU WILL SEE IT ALL IN THIS POST.

******THESE ARE ALL FACTS THAT OUR ILLUSTRIOUS PRESS ARE REFUSING TO INVESTIGATE THUS SHOWING THEY ARE AS CORRUPT AS THE POLITICIANS*****

Corrupt Government Legal Department PT 5.-91

FURTHER UPDATE  2/6/19.

I sent in my complaint meant for the Parliamentary Ombudsman via Tobias Ellwood MP on the 21st April. As you will have seen, he slowed it by insisting I fill in a form which I did and he notified me on the 4th May he'd sent it in to the Ombudsman.

Almost a MONTH later the Ombudsman has just sent me a letter confirming they have received it and it's now in the extreme time wasting machinery of a government department. Disappeared as you may say "into a huge black hole". I am informed "A case worker will now decide wheter we should carry out an investigation. ...there will be an extended wait....as we are working on a higher number of cases" Notice that they avoid like the plague saying they are complaints about government departments including the NHS (there will be untold thousands of NHS complaints clogging up the Ombudsman). This is what we ALWAYS HAVE TO PUT UP WITH ! Hence why it can take years going nowhere, being lied to and pushed onto other departments, who go through the same long winded avoidence tactics. Then at some stage you will be told your complaint is  "OUT IF TIME!"
Yes; because they have deliberately fucked you well and truly over to make you out of time ....then they can tell you to bugger off and out of their hair !

You can bet, either they will say they cannot investigate this shyster GLD Mob for some spurious lying reason, OR they will invent a whole load of lying excuses and alleged reasons why they cannot investigate either the case and what went on, or the GLD as they are 'Protected' in some way. They give that game away by going on to tell me "We also have to check if we can investigate in line with our 'legal powers'............GO ON HAVE A GUESS WHICH IT WILL BE. AND ALL THIS IS ONLY A COMPLAINT THAT THE GLD LIED WHOLESALE TO ME (AND WITH PROOF THEY DID) and THEY REFUSED TO ANSWER A NUMBER OF LEGIT QUESTIONS.

IF that eventuates its back to Ellwood to try and get him to do his duty to a constituent and one who is a VET who he says he specialises in representing, in some way.??

Corrupt Government Legal Department Pt 3-89.

In my last post I told you that I had sent into this shower a comprehensive Formal Complaint against Hobbs QC. With documentary evidence to back up my allegations. This was quite a hefty set of documents as I included copy of the 47 page transcript of his corrupt meeting when he carried out all his unlawful actions.

They are supposed to deal with such requests within 20 days and true to form it took well over that for me to get their excuses and whitewash letter dated the 12th March. This was a one page letter with 5 very short paragraphs/sentences. In short like their letter, they merely denied they ever employed Hobbs or for that matter that they had ever sent him to the shonky IPO hearing. They even had the cheek to lie that they even supplied what are called Appointed Persons to hear Appeals on behalf of IPO Appellants.

Of course I have a letter from the IPO that puts that lie to rest because they confirmed that they get their A/P's off the GLD. What liars these civil servants all are.

So obviously I have now sent in a complaint about all this to the CEO of the GLD and Mr J.Jones
and that is where I am now at. No doubt it will either be ignored or whitewashed again

I would put onto this blog on the right all of the letter together with all the supporting documents that went with it. However it is all far too long and in any case a lot of it is already to be seen on this blog. IE the Transcript is on, plus the Barristers opinion document  and they say it all or most of it all. I will in due time show the reject letter and any response I finally get, if any.

I have also sent yet another letter to the Sunday Times (already asked their Editor to stand up to his claim they investigate such stuff, but the bastard never even acknowledged let alone contacted me for the full details and evidence. Thus proving that our National big newspapers are all part of our Establishment cover up machinery, because they simply will not expose our corrupt justice system with all its corrupt and useless Judges and lawyers like Hobbs.

Corrupt MoJ & Gov Legal Dpt Continued. 88.

In my last and latest posts you will have read how my efforts to get justice from firstly the MoJ then through my complaining to the Parliamentary Ombudsman, when the MoJ failed to deal with my request and getting the usual unmitigated lies and obfuscations and typical twisting of the FACTS to refuse to act.

I sent on the 12th Feb, in my 8 page letter of complaint about the activities of Barrister Hobbs QC and what he did, to the Gov Legal Dpt and requesting they investigate it all. On their website they state that they will reply within 10 working days and then they would either give you their response or will tell you when they can. As I correctly thought would be the case, they have a month later, not even replied in any way.

In the last month the IPO have stated and confirmed that even today when they need an 'Appointed Person' to officiate at an Appeal Hearing, which was what Hobbs did, they get the A/P from the  Treasury Solicitors, now named the Government Legal Department. (YET THE GLD TOLD ME IN AN EMAIL RECENTLY THEY DO NOT DO THIS......so more lies from them) As I said in my last post it would them that I would now go to with this complaint about Hobbs and his unlawful and criminal actions.

Now on the GLD website they state that all lawyers and Barristers they use, actually work for that department, so they are not 'independent workers' and so it follows that as they are employees, the GLD MUST be responsible for their actions (as would the then Treasury Solicitors would have been)
Of course way back in around 2008 I complained to them about Hobbs and was fobbed of with the usual set of lies etc and all that and subsequent efforts of mine to get justice through a whole set of different bodies that all, only resulted in the usual lies as to what exactly the complaint was and how they could do nothing.

I sent the comprehensive complaint with all the detailing of what it was all about AND ACCOMPANIED BY a number of copies of documents that backed up my assertions and allegations. It went by registered post and was received by a GLD person called MARK on the 12th Feb.

I will put all these 8 documents onto this blog and will be seen on the right hand side of the first page or here, shortly  However I will now make comments on the highlighted lines that can be seen on those documents:- DOCUMENT 1. This is a letter sent me by the CEO of the Parl Ombudsman in reply to me asking them to investigate the MoJ for refusing to first of all, investigate Hobbs for his criminality and then stating they have no jurisdiction yet not stating why that was so. Then to cap it all ignoring my complaint about that.
You will see they say that the MoJ was correct in saying they have no jurisdiction. and they said that the MoJ had told me what route to take. They ignored my telling them that the routes they told of, were all rubbish and I'd told them anyway that I'd taken them all-to no avail. Then they state as you will see in the highlighted lines that if I wished to go back and request they should look into thisclaim they had no jurisdiction, then I should get back to them which I did but this was ignored in their subsequent reply......see Document 2.
DOCUMENT 2.
In this cover up document of three pages of waffle, you will see on page 2. (highlighted) that they, like EVERY liar in every government department I have complained to about Hobbs, again lie about how the MoJ cannot investigate Barristers as they are independent. Yet as I have said above in the case of Barristers working for the MoJ or the GLDpt, THEY ARE EMPLOYEES  and NOT independent workers who can just do what the hell they like as they are INDEPENDENT, which is the case when they work out of various CHAMBERS. ( A chambers is really only a collection of barristers all working out of offices at one location and are just a set of self employed high up lawyers, much like a bunch of plumbers or electricians all banding together in one workshop)
They also kindly say that the MoJ said I should complain to the IPO, and this despite me telling the MoJ that I had done that in 2007 and got nowhere as they used the same old lies. So just another web of lies, obfuscations and fobbing you off to get rid of you.
DOCUMENT 3. Proof that Barristers WORK for the GLD and are therefore EMPLOYEES.-IN ANY CASE NO MATTER WHETHER THE BARRISTER IS AN INDEPENDENT ENTITY OR AN EMPLOYEE UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE GLD-THEY ABSOLUTELY HAVE TO WORK UNDER THE RULE OF LAW AND HOBBS BROKE THE LAW-ESPECIALLY AS WHAT HE GOT UP TO ''PERVERTED THE COURSE OF JUSTICE' AND THAT IS A 'CRIMINAL ACT' AND THUS HE IS NOT ABOVE THE LAW AND SHOULD BE CHARGED FOR THIS 'CRIMINAL ACT' !!!!!! OF COURSE THE LAW ESTABLISHMENT WILL DO ANYTHING TO COVER ALL THIS UP.....THE UTTER BASTARDS !!!!!!

DOCUMENT 4. Proof that a complaint will get a reply of sorts within 10 working days (14 days in fact)
DOCUMENT 5. Is my 8 page complaint sent into the GLD. The documents I sent in with that letter are:-
Doc 1.The IPO Hearing Officer Mr Landau and his summing up of the hearing in which he said Busbridge could not claim my Trade Mark. Can be seen elsewhere in this blog.
Doc 2. The IPO CEO's ( Mr Marchant) letter to me stating that the Landau decision meant I'd won.
Doc 3. Busbridges Appeal reasons (all rubbish and not legal so he should never have been given an appeal)
Doc 4.The IPO's Mr Colombo letter to me in which he explains the legal requirement to be met to be given an appeal.
Doc 5. The opinion of a Barrister called Antell reiterating the legal requirements needed to get an appeal.
Doc 6. The actual Hobbs bogus appeal hearing TRANSCRIPT.
Doc 7. Copy of the 'Self Litigants Handbook' which details what a Judge or Barrister hearing any court case and what they cannot do IE-GIVE ADVICE as Hobbs did.
Doc 8 Copy of the terms of service for 'Appointed Persons' which includes that they must not be biased, which Hobbs was and could be seen in the transcript to be so....by slagging me off and so on!!
Doc 9. Show that GLD Barristers are employees.
Doc 10. Letter from Mr Marchant, the then IPO CEO telling me the bogus Hobbs appeal hearing had been postponed (which is unlawful)
Doc 11. An Email from Colombo to Busbridge giving him advice-which is unlawful.
Doc 12. Another letter from the IPO to Busbridge giving him advice-unlawful.
Doc 13. Yet another letter to Busbridge giving him unlawful advice.
Doc 14. The Barrister P.Bush document in which he gives his opinion of most of the UNLAWFUL goings on at that bogus Appeal Hearing, officiated by Hobbs.
Doc 15 A Barrister called Simpson, who states that right at the beginning of my battle against Busbridge and Chrysler in 1992 should have been conjoined. This proves that the IPO had been up to no good.
Doc 16. GLD employment facts.

IF YOU READ THE WHOLE OF MY LETTER TO THE GLD, THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WILL BE EXPLAINED  AS TO RELEVANCE. MANY ARE ALREADY LISTED ON THIS BLOG, EITHER ON THE LIST OF DOCUMENTS FILE OR CONTAINED WITHIN VARIOUS POSTS.

Corrupt Ministry of Justice-AGAIN. 85.

In past, but fairly recent posts, I chronicled my efforts of complaining to the MoJ, that one of their employee Barristers, a Hobbs QC, who is viewed as the top Barrister in the Intellectual Property world and all matters to do with IP, cynically set up in conjunction with the top IPO legal man, a Mr James, a bogus alleged 'Appeal Hearing'.

Why set it up, is the question anyone would ask? Well it became clear after the dirty deed was done in 2005, that for some reason the IPO after confirming back in 1996 that I had legally proved my right to the Trade Mark 'Viper', (and this done for me by legal IP experts) had made 'A MISTAKE. They cynically said so at the last Tribunal Hearing in 2010...."we had made a mistake" and their way of 'correcting' this alleged mistake, was to subject me to a great number of corrupt actions, which started with the bogus appeal hearing and was absolutley pivotable in governing all that happened after it. This was the ONLY WAY they could play enough dirty tricks that would eventuate in their ability to finalise their long held wish to strip me of my legitimately proven 'right' to that T/M. That they for some reason didn't want me to have. I have several theories as to why they felt this way, but how do I prove them??

So that bogus hearing or as I prefer to call it 'a meeting' had to be set up the way it was. For they had determined that the only way they could carry out the dirty tricks they had in mind, to 'wrestle' back my T.M was to 'ADVISE' the little crook who had set his eyes of stealing that T/M (so he could sell it for £500K to Chrysler) and steal my well known sportscar manufacturing business, making a copy of my Cobra Replica which I had called 'VIPER'. (For those who may think I had copied the AC Cobra exactly-think again-for my chassis bore no relation to the AC and was Jag based, and the body was also quite different. It was more of a look-a-like than and exact replica, yet Busbridge copied my car 100% with no differences.) They simply should not have allowed his request for an appeal against the decision that had gone against him and given by a Hearing Officer called Landau. For the crook Busbridge, his criminal game was really over. He had no legal bona-fide rights to any sort of appeal, yet they gave him one. WHY???

They could hardly tell him;  'come to the IPO HQ and we will give you a bucket full of legal advice....all shonky of course-which will enable you to get out of the legal corner you are now in'.....could they ?? But they could and did as I say, illegally give him this shonky appeal hearing, which would enable them to come face to face with him and this all dressed up as a bona-fide appeal hearing. But once that cynical and bogus meeting started, they never carried out any pucka appeal hearing at all and that can clearly be seen if you bother to read the transcript of it which can be seen at the right hand column on this blog. All you will see is 47 pages of legal advice giving which is strictly forbidden, yet they obvioulsy thought......"Who is going to know all this and who can do anything aagainst us as we HAVE THE POWER.....BASTARDS.

Why else did they refuse me attendance (illegally) of this meeting? Why else did they not tell me that I could have attended as a member of the Public.?? Why else did they refuse, despite my asking many times over 15 months as did my MP, where is the decision of what we thought had been a pucka APPEAL HEARING??????? They lied through their back teeth each and every time....IT'S ALL THERE IN BLACK AND WHITE AND THEY EVEN LIED TO MY MP, SO CONFIDENT WERE THEY THAT NO ONE COULD TOUCH THEM !!!!!!

Eventually I was told that the appeal had been droppped by Busbridge after he'd been given all that legal advice and told what to do, which included dropping the BOGUS appeal. The IPO said they would then go on and help him to carry out their advice....it's all there in the transcript which they never thought I'd get my hands on. Of course this all explains the extraordinary lengths involved thereafter and including others in the Justice Establishment, who have for 8 years now tried to bury all this and cover it up.

You will have seen my recent efforts to get the MoJ to take legal action or at least see that legal action is taken against Hobbs for his criminality. You will have seen their lies and squirming, to get out of it by claiming they have no jurisdiction to 'do anything' That they will not even say why they have no 'JURISDICTION !! This even the Parliamentary Ombudsman, who are set up to make sure that all government departments act legally and competently and so on, they have also lied by saying they cannot make the MoJ take action, when that is CLEARLY NOT WHAT I HAD ASKED THEM TO DO, AS WHAT I HAD ASKED, WAS "JUST ASK THE MOJ TO EXPLAIN WHY THEY HAVE NO JURISDICTION OVER ONE OF THEIR EMPLOYEES?" ITS JUST MORE SQUIRMING AND TRYING IT ON.

If one reads the MoJ website you will see it is clearly stated in their various boasts of what they are about and that all the lawyers and Barristers that work for them in their arm of justice, called the Government Legal Department, are employees.  Not as elsewhere in the justice system where Barristers cannot be touched, as they are completely independent of anyone (like Judges). Thus this gives them the ability to carry out such illegal activities as Hobbs did and with absolute impunity.
However as I state, as Hobbs was not independent like that, so he should be answerable to his bosses- the MoJ.  For his criminal behaviour at that bogus held meeting, dressed up as an appeal hearing. Hence why the MoJ simply refuses to answer my questions and is obfuscating and lying in order to fob me off and cover it all up.
I am going to one last time write to the snake oil salesman, a Mr Jake Hancock,of the Parliamentary Ombudsman, a supreme lying shit who terms himself as a 'INTAKE CASE WORKER' but in reality is just a pen-pushing jerk whose job is to FUCK UP ANYONE with the temerity to try and expose the one bastard in this government department, who should be in jail!! I will AGAIN TELL HIM I WANT AN ANSWER AS TO WHY THE MOJ HAS NO JURISDICTION TO SEE ONE OF ITS EMPLOYES FACE THE LAW OF THE LAND ?????? AFTER ALL ISN'T THAT THE JOB OF THE MOJ....AND TO SEE LAWS ARE OBEYED AND 'JUSTICE IS DONE AND BE SEEN TO BE DONE??????

I got a reply from arch snake oil salesman, Jake Hancock, in which he simply said he couldn't add to anything he'd already said in his last letter where he covered up for the MoJ as stated above. Again he chose to ignore me saying that I'd asked him to get the MoJ to state why they had no jurisdiction and I'd not asked him to get the MOJ to take action merely to answer a simple question.....YOU SEE THIS IS HOW THESE ASSHOLE CIVIL SERVANTS WORK: You ask a simple question they don't want to answer as it will give the game away, so they change it slightly, to you asking something similar but quite different and then they can make their lying excuses. You can go back a HUNDRED TIMES pointing out what they've done, yet they just either ignore you or tell you to go away, or they just repeat their lying excuses ad infinitum. 

Members of the British Public are being denied legal aid to bring such cases as mine, or ANY cases re ANYTHING except of course if you are a criminal juts like the recent case of that young bloke who got his girlfriend killed in his speed boat lark. He failed to turn up at his court case for manslaughter and went to Georgia. YET THE LEGAL AID BOARD GAVE HIM LEGAL AID TO FIGHT AN APPEAL WHILE HE WAS ON THE RUN !!!! THIS IS THE BARMY COUNTRY WE LIVE IN . My case has ramifications for the justice system and therefore is IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST to be held and exposed.THIS IS HOW OUR MUCH LAUDED JUSTICE SYSTEM IS BEING RUN IN OUR BROKEN COUNTRY. No wonder they are doing everything to hide it, cover it up and so on. ARE YOU PROUD TO BE BRITISH????

 

Corrupt Ministry of Justice - Perverting the course of Justice. 81.

You may wonder if you follow this story, why nothing has been reported since May. Well it's not because I've kicked the bucket, but the way all our government departments take FOREVER to reply to anything you send them.

In my last few posts you will have seen I went to the very Minister who should be in charge of the MoJ, but who just passed back to them, my complaint. Obviously they tried to get rid of it by passing it onto the government department that deals with Courts & Tribunals and so all I got as load of waffle and lies off them.

All this took months and I was then prompted send to the Ministry a letter called an official 'Formal Complaint' Now any government department HAS TO DEAL WITH SUCH COMPLAINTS SENT THEM BY A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC........ What did the MoJ do????? COMPLETELY IGNORED IT....... THE GALL OF THESE PEOPLE KLNOWS NO BOUNDS. So after giving them time to respond (more untold weeks) I could then take it to the PARLIAMENTARY OMBUDSMAN.
However this mob is as big a con on the Public as all other government bodies.

Now officially before you can go to this useless mob, you are obliged to have gone through the COMPLETE complaints process of the government department you are wanting to make a complaint about. If they do not satisfy you with what they may have done with your complaint, after the last stage 3 of the bureaucratic process, they are supposed to tell you that if you are still not satisfied you can take it to the Parliamentary Ombudsman. The bureaucracy is mind boggling and it's all an attempt to get you absolutely fed up with all the obstructions and time taken and will give in....not me tho'.

Can you see that because the MoJ ignored my Formal Complaint, I had no such letter-so, you wonder if any attempt to use the P/Oms will be rebuffed? I thought that I should in the first instance ring their enquiries department and pose this question. I spoke to a Helen Marshall and she said I had sent my Formal Complaint to the right section of the MoJ and she would send them an email asking them why they have ignored my complaint. After two weeks no contact from her....another phone call and another promise to chivvy them up. Another two weeks she does not as promised keep me informed, so ANOTHER phone call to her and this time I tell her this cannot go on. She begs to to let her try again, but incredibly she then writes to me telling me that she had at last spoken to one of their lying goons who sent her a copy of my original complaint and told her (lying of course) that they had responded to that and sent her a copy of that too.

Now here you will see what devious bastards I am dealing with and they completely fooled her into thinking my complaint had been dealt with which of course it had not been. I emailed her and pointed out that I had indeed received that letter months ago AND HAD REPLIED TO EVERY LIE IN IT.....TO THE WRITER AND HAD RECEIVED-NO REPLY.....HENCE WHY I HAD TO COME TO HER !!!! She told me that I would have to REPEAT MY COMPLAINT TO THEM....
YOU SIMPLY CANNOT MAKE THESE DEVIOUS BASTARDS UP !!!

So I had to go along with that, because if you don't they just use that as an excuse to kick you once more. So on the 28th August in went my SECOND FORMAL COMPLAINT and I will have to give them yet another month and if no reply or just more lies, I will have to either go to a stage 2 complaint then a stage 3 and then back to the Parl/Oms. I do not for one minute think that the MoJ will ever admit that they are not the squeeky clean department they ABSOLUTELY SHOULD BE,  but are as corrupt as any of Putins Ministry for Justice...if indeed he has one!  Nor do I think that the Parl/Oms will ever do anything.

If that eventually eventuates, then I will try my own MP, the posh-lad Tobias Ellwood, the very Hero of the terrorist attack on the Houses of Parliament........if you believe all that crap they said about him. You see I want to go to absolutely every corner I have to, to enable me to show that in this country we have a government that is so devious (you only have to see what the devious bastards are doing to the Brexit process, in order to scupper it, and that shows their utter disdain for democracy) that a member of the public like myself, stands no chance.

That brings me to just how useless our British Press is. For as I have said before, I have tried to get them onto all this and GOT ABSOLUTELY NOWHERE. Are they all in the pockets of government? - I wonder. The so called Premier newspaper of the land .....non other than the Sunday Times, who boasted several times how they fear no one in government and will investigate them too if necessary. Well all BULLSHIT as I have written TWICE to their Editor about all this AND HE TOO HAS IGNORED MY LETTERS.....SO MUCH FOR OUR PRESS AND THE WAY THEY BEHAVE - WITH ACTIONS OF THE LOWEST ORDER.

When I get news of my Formal complaint I will put that into the next post. 
   

Corrupt Teresa May- IPO & Ministry of Justice-latest events. 79.

Over the past four months I have attempted to try and get these useless and corrupt individuals to look at how their ministry and a barrister in it acted corruptly. I talk here about that 2005 alleged Appeal Hearing where the CORRUPT Hobbs QC did what he did.
I first of all sent off a letter to a Liz Truss, then a Justice Minister, heading the letter that it should only be read by her. (Described in a previous post) All I got was a brush off crop of lies from some unknown CLERK.

She departed after 5 minutes in office having done sod all about anything, as they do and another useless wretch takes over....Lidlington. By this time I have the Barristers opinion, so that gets included. He departs after 5 minutes in office and we now see what a **** he is when he gives a good impression on TV of being like just the detestable Blair, in looks and speech. Yet another useless wretch arrives 5 minutes later on and this time it is this guy called Gauke, who I prefer to call Gawky Gauke and who the Press also are obviously not impressed with, either.

Eventually after 6 WEEKS I get a letter from the Ministry - BUT NOT FROM LIDLINGTON OR GAUKE, but from a clerk called Skinner and his reply. In my subsequent reply I show my displeasure at the lies and misreading of my letter that he has indulged in to get out of doing anything. So see, he has obviously not read my letter and its points and how he ignores completely the legal opinion document I enclosed. It will be all self explanatory when I eventually put all the recent documents to the MoJ and then to Saint Teresa on the links to the right where many documents to the whole history can be seen. At this point in time I await a reply from Gauke which I know I will not get. In fact I don't expect any reply, going on past experiences and indeed wekks on I find that this is exactly the case....absolutely no reply from Gawky Gauke.

If the Justice Ministry believe the they can just lie and lie and thus get rid of me, they can think again for there are other avenues to still go down  to eventually try to get JUSTICE. So long as my health keeps up and my brain still works they will have to kill me to-get rid of me!!

IPO.

Why bother with the exact same mob who has been responsible for a lot of the corruption I have had heaped upon me? Well during my thinking on the history from day one, it has always been in my mind that right from day one back in 1992, when I was forced to have to come into contact with his corrupt and useless mob, there has always been one question I could never get any answer on. It is to do with DID THE IPO DELIBERATELY PUT ME INTO THE COURT TO OPPOSE CHRYSLER
BEFORE BUSBRIDGE?? ( my criminal ex agent who stole my car designs and Trade Mark Viper)
To elaborate: When Chrysler applied to register the T/M Viper in Jan 1990, Busbridge applied to the IPO to oppose that application, before my Patent Agent did, by about 2 weeks. He also applied to register the Mark himself, again before I did and by some 4 years. My Patent Agent always said that when I actually applied was of no importance, as opposing Chrysler and winning would show I had first rights, by a mile and so when I applied was of no consequence. So he only applied in 1996.
So I thought that by posing to the IPO as a student of Trade Mark law having seen the IPO online description of the corrupt 2004 Hearing, which the IPO made sure Busbridge won. ( I had opposed his application to register and don't forget by then I had already been given registration on winning against Chrysler) So because this description plainly stated I had started use of the T/M in 1985 and Busbridge only (and illegally) since 1992. They had stated that as he had applied to register before me-I could not oppose his application. Thus rubbishing the law that states that the first to use is the rightful owner. So discrepancy 1. Discrepancy 2 is obviously going on that premis, why was Busbridge not made to oppose Chrysler BEFORE me?? all outcomes would have been MASSIVELY DIFFERENT had that happened.
So I sent a letter to General Enquiries making these two points.....who gets heard first when multiple applications are made to Oppose a Registration Application by a third party....the first to apply?
Similarly who gets to be heard first when multiple applications to register are made, the first to apply? I was eventually told the question had been passed onto the relevant department...The Tribunal Section.

YOU COULD NOT MAKE UP WHAT HAPPENED NEXT-FOR I GET A REPLY FROM NON OTHER THAN A RAOUL COLOMBO-HEAD OF THAT SECTION..........
THIS IS THE LYING BASTARD WHO IS OBVIOUSLY STILL IN A JOB AT THE IPO AND STILL A HIGH UP MANAGER,  YEARS AFTER HE LIED THROUGH HIS BACK TEETH OVER THE CORRUPT 2005/6 BOGUS APPEAL HEARING HELD BY HOBBS QC. LIED TO ME AND MY MP....ITS ALL IN THIS BLOG IF YOU CARE TO GO BACK.
HERE HE IS NOW REPLYING TO ME IN A LETTER IN WHICH HE LIES AGAIN IN HIS EXPLANATIONS. (See his reply when its put into the link to the documents to do with this latest example of lies and corruption of the IPO and MoJ)
It becomes obvious to me he has twigged on that this person asking, is not a K.Weber but ME. For he, when I reply, showing that his answers make no sense, he then refuses to reply. So I go back to General Enquiries and pose the same question in a different way..... two weeks later NO REPLY. SO YOU SEE I HAVE OBVIOUSLY HIT A NERVE HERE AND I BELEIVE THAT THE IPO DELIBERATELY DEALT WITH THE APPLICATIONS FROM ME AND BUSBRIDGE IN THE EARLY DAYS, IN A CORRUPT AND INCORRECT WAY, SO AS TO GET OUTCOMES THEY WISHED TO GET.

I have along the way had legal advice that what they should have done is put both my opposition to Chrysler and Busbridges....together so that we both would have appeared in that 1998 court hearing. Busbridge would have lost and that would have been the end of his continued crooked actions, all aided by the IPO. If he didn't like that outcome he would have had to APPEAL.... IN THE HIGH COURT.....which he COULD NOT AFFORD TO DO....GOODBYE CROOK!!! I had to win and that would eventually have been the end of it all.
So one has to believe that this CROOK IPO MANAGER-COLOMBO, REALISES I AM ONTO SOMETHING AND HE IS UPTO HIS LYING ONCE AGAIN.

BE PATIENT TO SEE ALL THE EVIDENCE, AS IT WILL ALL GO INTO THE LINK. I AM WAITING TO SEE HOW I GO WITH MY LATEST EFFORT TO GET NEWSPAPERS ONTO THE FACT THAT THE MoJ ARE CORRUPT AND ARE TRYING TO BURY IT ALL BY REFUSING TO DEAL WITH MY LETTERS AND EVIDENCE.(Along with Mrs May)
HOWEVER I HAVE NO MORE FAITH IN UK NEWSPAPERS AS THEY SEEM TO MOSTLY FAVOUR POLITICIANS AND LET US FACE IT AND BE HONEST.....TO INVESTIGATE MY ASSERTIONS IT WILL SHOW HOW WE DO NOT LIVE IN A LAND UNDER THE RULE OF LAW....HOW CAN WE? WHEN OUR MoJ BARRISTERS WITHIN IT AND EVEN THE MINISTER IN CHARGE, ARE DOING THEIR BEST TO HIDE WHAT WENT ON.....BECAUSE IT WOULD PROVE WE DO NOT LIVE BY THE RULE OF LAW-BECAUSE OUR POLICE NOWADAYS WILL NOT INVESTIGATE ANYTHING AND THE JUSTICE SYTEM IS THOROUGHLY BENT.

VERY SOON NOW, I WILL BE DOING ANOTHER VIDEO TO GO ON HERE-WHERE I WILL GO OVER ALL THE RECENT HAPPENINGS RE MY TRYING TO GET JUSTICE AND HOW I HAVE GOT NOWHERE. NOT EVEN SAINT TERESA WILL LIFT A FINGER AND SHOW US JUST HOW  MUCH OF A SAINT SHE IS!!!!!!

Stuffed by the State- how it can ruin your life. 78.

     Please read the previous post to this before you (or after) view this video as it gives you

                           addtional info on facts contained in the video. Thanks.

DECEMBER 2017- I HAVE NOW OBTAINED A BARRISTER-COUNSEL'S OPINION ON THIS THOROUGHLY CORRUPT 2005 BOGUS IPO HEARING, THAT I TALK ABOUT IN THIS VIDEO- HE AGREES WITH EVERY POINT I HAVE MADE. HE MAKES 11 LEGAL POINTS AS TO HOW IT WAS ILLEGAL INCLUDING THE FACT THAT I WAS DENIED ATTENDANCE TO IT. IN THE NEW YEAR I WILL BE PUTTING ON HERE A SECOND VIDEO WHERE I WILL GO OVER WHAT HE SAID.

I AM  PUTTING ONTO THIS BLOG COPY OF HIS OPINION LETTER WHICH CAN BE
                          SEEN ON A LINK TO THE RIGHT OF BLOG PAGE .
YOU WILL SEE HE BRINGS UP 11 LEGAL POINTS WHICH I HERE LIST:-

1. HE AGREES IT WAS NOT AN 'APPEAL' HEARING, SO WHY WAS IT HELD?
2. THE 'APPOINTED PERSON'(AP) SHOULD HAVE DEALT ONLY WITH THE DECISION OF LANDAU.
3. THE IPO SHOULD NOT HAVE DENIED ME THE RIGHT TO ATTEND AS IT DEALT WITH MY 'REGISTERED TRADE MARK'. THE A.P SHOULD HAVE NOTIFIED ME OF THE HEARING AND THAT I COULD ATTEND.
4. THE A.P DID NOT 'DETERMINE THE APPEAL' BROUGHT BY BUSBRIDGE.(in other words he never dealt with it in any way)
5. THE A.P DID NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO ADJOURN THE ALLEGED APPEAL-'HIGHLY IRREGULAR' (this is legal speak for 'ILLEGAL)
6. IT WAS UNLAWFUL TO ALLOW THE APPELLANT (RB) TO WITHDRAW AND 'FIX' DEFECTS IN HIS CASE. 
7. RB HAD NO RIGHTS TO REGISTER THE TRADE MARK ON THE BASIS OF ALLEGED ASSIGNMENTS (As decreed by the Landau decision he was supposed top be appealing)
8. THE A.P 'MISUNDERSTOOD' (DELIBERATELY I SAY) THE DECISION OF LANDAU.
9. THE MANNER IN WHICH THE BOGUS APPEAL HEARING WAS CONDUCTED WAS 'IRREGULAR' AND SHOULD HAVE BEEN TAKEN ON TO A JUDICIAL REVIEW.
10. MR JAMES OF THE IPO LEGAL DEPARTMENT HAD NO RIGHT TO BE PRESENT.
11. THE A.P SHOULD NOT HAVE ADVISED RB AS HE DID THROUGHOUT THIS BOGUS HEARING AND EVEN STATED HE SHOULD NOT-BUT CARRIED ON DOING IT ANYWAY!!!! 

THE WHOLE OF THIS HEARING WAS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE AS I HAVE CLAIMED FOR YEARS, WITH THE IPO  AND MORE IMPORTANTLY THE JUSTICE MINISTRY & THEIR MINISTER-REFUSING TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT.

Corrupt Police & IPO-how they aided a crook. 72.

On a post I made back on the 19th April I told how I had sent a letter to Liz Truss the Justice Minister, where I told her how a Judge had trashed my business and life and how I had found it absolutely impossible to get justice through any avenue, including all the complaint procedures within the justice system. How I had been stonewalled at every turn by the Establishment Johnnies who are not interested in real justice, only protecting their fellow cronies.

JUSTICE MINISTER>

Well yesterday I got a reply, but predictably not from her. So some obnoxious civil servant must have way-laid my letter so she never saw it and had not read it properly, as they never do and then thought that some other government department should be given it so as to bury it in someway. So this letter of reply was from the HM Courts & Tribunals, Customer Investigation Section. Don't they make you seeth these modern twerps that infest all of our PC Plonker government departments. They treat you as if they were a BUSINESS and you are a 'CUSTOMER' and as if you had willingly gone to them to get 'SERVICE' of some sort or to buy something.

It was the predictable short reply they always send you, full of lying excuses as to how they can 'Do nothing' then they trot out one lie after another. They have obviously not read your letter and understood what you were saying or more like it, they have deliberately 'misread' it and that has given them the right to then think up lies to excuse them doing nothing. Every avenue I'd already been down previously had used this absolute lie of an excuse:- "the judiciary are constitutionally independent of government and they must be able to make their decisions without interference"
So what this means is any judge can behave in whatever way they want INCLUDING ACTING IN AN UNLAWFUL WAY....BREAKING THE LAWS THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO UPHOLD!!! and they get off Scott free, as they are 'untouchable'. That is obvious BOLLOCKS for they can be charged when they break the law. Very few do for the same reasons I am coming up against. No politician is willing to stand up to them as is no one in the Police or even our rotten Press.

The letter went on:- "It is therefore not possible for a government Minister to comment on or intervene in matters that have been the subject of judicial consideration" Now you can see how slippery they are and how they use this excuse over and over again -TOTALLY IGNORING WHAT I TOLD THEM IN MY LETTER !! The hearing that Judge Hobbs officiated in was an appeal hearing or was supposed to be. Yet no matters to do with any appeal and what the appellant had given that gave him the right to appeal, and its legal merits etc, were ever discussed. Nor was there ANY DECISION EVERMADE!!!! As the appellant had never raised ANY LEGAL REASONS as to how he could even have an appeal which should have been in the statement he gave when asking for an appeal, which he was legally obliged to do, nothing like that was gone into. As I told them the transcript shows clearly that all that the alleged hearing covered, was this judge giving the appellant a bucket load of ADVICE ON HOW HE COULD CIRCUMVENT THE DECISION GIVEN AGAINST HIM THAT HE WAS SUPPOSED TO BE APPEALING. THIS IS ILLEGAL AND CONSTITUTED AN ACT OF PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE. 
SEE ON THE RIGHT OF THIS PAGE WHERE YOU CAN DOWNLOAD THE TRANSCRIPT AND READ IT YOURSELF.

Of course no one has the guts to want to agree on what actually did happen and to stand up against the 'Judicial Mafia'. Including NEWPAPERS!! This woman writer, a Miss Charlotte Green, whoever she is, went on to say that she had tried to trace my case or find what appeal routes I had taken. This just shows you what THICKO'S I am dealing with. For the case was never heard in front of a 'normal' Court but at a Tribunal Hearing under the auspices of the 'TREASURY SOLICITORS' and what's more, as I plainly told Lizz Truss I was not the person who applied to have an appeal hearing, as it was my enemy and ex agent who stole my Trade Mark and business and they denied me access or any say in that hearing!! So it was obvious she would never be able to trace anything through the normal courts records.

She then cheekily advises me to go to the Citizens Advice, who I approached some time ago and predictably it was so far out of their depths it was a farce, as I knew it would be. No solicitor will touch it, you cannot get Legal Aid and in any case hardly any lawyers do Legal Aid these days except for protecting illegal immigrants and terrorists who want to stay in this country, so they can blow up our kids. It all makes me sick as there are lawyers falling over themselves to do that, but protect a Brit from corrupt lawyers and Judges....NO WAY SO GO AWAY!!

Another lying excuse she kept making was "If I wanted to appeal the 'decision' as I was unhappy with the 'decision' etc" When I specifically said in my letter to Truss that NO APPEAL HEARING TOOK  PLACE AND SO NO 'DECISION' WAS EVER MADE AS THE APPELLANT DROPPED HIS APPEAL!!!!!!!! AND THAT AFTER HE'D GOT THE ADVICE TO DO, SO THEN FOLLOW THEIR INSTRUCTIONS AND THEN HIS LIFE WOULD SUDDENLY TURN INTO LIGHT AND ROSES AND HE COULD THEN GO ON AND FINISH OFF HIS ATTEMPTS TO STEAL MY TRADE MARK AND FINISH OFF MY BUSINESS!!!! HOW CORRUPT AND UNLAWFUL IS ALL THAT AND THE DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE IS ALL THERE FOR ALL TO SEE AND SHOWS THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED.

So you have to either think she was as thick as two short planks and could not grasp what I had said.....or more likely she was being her usual civil service devious lying, and twisting what I had said and that meant she could invent lying excuses to do nothing. I HAD HIGHLIGHTED IN CAPITALS THAT NO DECISION HAD EVER BEEN MADE ETC ETC.  Of course this election has stuffed up me being able to go back to the Justice Minister right now and will it even be Miss Truss??  So more time wasted. But as you can see I am a VERY perservering person who will keep going on.

HERE ARE COPIES  OF THOSE THREE LETTERS BETWEEN ME AND LIZ TRUSS MP, THE REPLY FROM MISS GREEN AND MY REPLY TO HER GIVING HER 'WHAT (Is this rubbish you sent me?  )

READING THEM YOU WILL SEE AND GRASP ALL THAT THIS IS ABOUT......HOW THE POLITICIANS, THEIR DEVIOUS PROTECTING CIVIL SERVANTS AND A*******s IN THE SO CALLED JUSTICE SYSTEM, BEHAVE WITH LIES, IN ORDER TO STUFF YOU ABOUT AND DENY YOU ANY SORT OF CLOSURE AND 'JUSTICE' ETC.

Corrupt Police & IPO-how they aided a crook. 71.

Throughout this blog I have recounted and just recently too, about the corrupt Judge Hobbs QC and how he behaved and that ruined my life too and how it was impossible for me to get justice against the ramifications of what he did. How I have tried to get newspapers into this story with no luck. Same again trying to find a lawyer to take out a prosecution on a no win no fee basis. Absoluely no one wanted to touch it  and all lied via various excuses etc.

 Just a few days ago it was reported that the Justice Secretary, Liz Truss, who had made it clear she does not like Judges much either and this especially so after the way they behaved over the Brexit issue when they showed their obvious bias with those two big hearings. Brought about by, I must say, a non Anglo Saxon Brit who made it her job to tell us real Brits how to run our country and get this; by using money she had made by us allowing her to make her good living here. How is that for a kick in our teeth?? (All the Judges denied they were biased even in the face, that the majority were known to be pro EU) Truss made an observation which got up the nose of their head Judge, a Judge Neuberger and he had his pennyworth about what he thought about her and her comments. Cheeky sod as he isn't elected and she is and she is free to say what she wants!! These Judge BASTARDS now think they really rule this country and not our elected Parliament as they are ALWAYS telling Parliament to change the laws they have made as they are unlawful etc and have overturned legal decisions made in courts. This especially to do with immigration matters. No coincidence there when their top Judge is of immigrant stock and so many are, in our justice system these days.  No BIAS THERE THEN !!??

Anyway this has shown me that she has an opinion that may help me. So I have just written to her briefly outlining what Judge Hobbs did to me in direct contravention of the law. How I have irrefutable evidence of that in the transcript of that hearing and how I have found trying to get justice about that, has shown me that there is AN IRON CURTAIN AROUND OUR JUDGES THAT MEANS YOU WILL NEVER EVER GET JUSTICE AGAINST ANY OF THEM. I asked her what she had to say about that. ESPECIALLY AS HER POLITICAL CLASSES ARE ALWAYS TELLING US PEASANTS HOW LUCKY WE ARE TO LIVE IN A DEMOCRACY AND UNDER THE RULE OF LAW...WHAT UTTER BULLSHIT AS THIS SHOWS.  Now the thing is, going on past experiences I doubt if I will EVER GET AN ANSWER, LET ALONE ANY HELP. PLACE YOUR BETS NOW! I will report on what if anything happens.

Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 68.

POSSIBILITES RE CHYSLER & THE IPO>

Those of you who have been following this enquiry may like me have been appalled by the antics of the various ex Met chiefs who have been interviewed. What a bunch of twisting liars they presented as. Of course two of them who were supposed to be running the Met, when I was trying to get those useless bastards to investigate Busbridge. Stevens was one and he as with the rest, lied his head of about what he knew about the phone hacking.
One of them had to resign because of his involvement in dubious goings on. Now what really hacks me off is the deafening silence we always get when the media expose our useless and corrupt cops. During all these sickening relevations of the past weeks at this enquiry, not one politician has voiced his concern that we obviously have a throughly discredited and corrupt police force in the Met and this force is supposed to be the premier force of the UK. Of course all the different forces are the same but the Met should be a shining example, which it simply isn't and never has been. Except it is a shining example of just how corrupt coppers can be.
No, our pollies don't seem to be in the slightest bit bothered, when what they should be doing is going all out to expose them for what they are and cleaning the filth up. So the bastards just keep getting away with it....the incompetence and the corruption just carries on.
I rarely meet anyone who has any time for the BASTARDS these days and I am talking here about people I know or meet, who like me cannot stand our police and have no time for them at all, not those who are criminals or yobs, as I do not mix with the trash of Brit life in any way. These are all people like myself, professionals or business people and the like. How have we got to the stage in Brit life when so few people have the slightest faith in the very people who are supposed to be there to protect us from the scum of the Earth???

Going back to what I have said in the past few posts as to why did the IPO behaved in the way it did over this whole case. Many may think that my thoughts on what was the reasons the IPO did what they did and the possible actions Chysler may have carried out, are too far fetched. Well think about this; in addition to what I've already put forward, Chrysler when they started to export their Vipers to Europe, spent a lot of money in promoting their car. They set up a special racing series for that car and as I've said no Yanky international company will spend what they did only to have some upstart like me get in their way of being able to call their car in the UK, by the name of Viper.
That is eactly what I did, first by stopping them from being able to register that name in the UK after I won that hearing with the IPO in 1996. What Chyrysler did after that was to deliberately try and ruin me with legal costs by saying they were going to appeal it and then dragging their feet for FOUR YEARS until I went to a legal team and FORCED them to give up. They KNEW they had no case, so why did they behave like this......BECAUSE LIKE SO MANY YANK COMPANIES.... THEY HAD NO MORALS.
Even after they had to drop their saying they wanted to appeal, they carried on calling their car, in the UK, by MY REGISTERED NAME OF VIPER. So I had to take legal action which stopped them and they had to pay my costs.
Now what I am trying to point out to you, is that any company that behaves in the corrupt and immoral way, like they did for over ten years and over them wanting to own that name, IS PERFECTLY CAPABLE OF PAYING SOMEONE IN THE IPO FROM THE BEGINNING BACK IN 1992, TO SWING THINGS FOR THEM. And of course anyone in the IPO who was part of that corrupt action, would do anything to hide that fact and that would include doing to me what they did and making sure that Busbridge got the T/M, as they knew he was in with Chrysler. They knew that once he got the rego of the T/M, he would sell it to Chrsyler and then Chrysler will have got what they wanted. Of course what they never realised at the beginning is that I would put up such a fight which made all the procedures last for going on 20 years.
There will be those of you who will know that long before that period of time was reached, Chryslers fortunes took a big turn for the worse and they very nearly went out of business. Also in the meantime their Viper simply never took off in the UK or Europe as it was a typical peice of Yank rubbish as far as sportscars went and not really the type of sportscar Europeans go for.. They never sold very many at all.
However whoever in the IPO got themselves in the pay and involved with Chrysler had by doing that, carried out corruption and illegal activities which they would have to cover up. It is not such a tall story at all as these things happen all the time in the civil service for if you like me, follow what goes on in British life will know. Civil servants get themselves into corruption all the time and let us not forget......... THAT THE POLICE ARE ALL CIVIL SERVANTS THEMSELVES AND LOOK AT WHAT CORRUPTION THEY HAVE BEEN INVOLVE IN, OVER ALL OF MY LIFETIME AND SOME OF WHICH IS NOW COMING OUT INTO THE OPEN!!!!
STILL THINK CIVIL SERVANTS ARE AS CLEAN AS A WHISTLE? 

Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 67.

CORRUPT GOVERNMENT>FACTS THAT PROVE THIS>

Now that the Leveson enquiry has reached the point where a top woman Police Officer has just reported facts that I have been saying in this blog for three years now; that all government departments are steeped in corruption because too many of its officials have been up to their necks in corrupt practices. Mainly by taking back handers from the media and others.
Well tell us something new is what I say. Of course in my case they have been corrupt in that way, I am sure, and in other ways which I have highlighted in this blog and my book, over and over again. Now this is all out in the open I feel that I must now put forward my own ideas that I have had for a long time, as to just how the IPO have been corrupt over the 20 year history with them.
So here is what I feel is a real and feasible explanation as to why they acted against me and went to the ends of the earth to see me stripped of my IP in the Trade Mark Viper, I so obviously and legally owned. One has to go back to the beginning of my blog and see how things started off. The reason Busbridge tried to prove he owned my Mark Viper, was simply because he found out that Chrysler wanted to register that mark for itself, starting with their application to register it in Jan 1990. They did not realise that I had been using it since Jan 1986 and therefore had prior usage and the first claim to it, but I had not registered or applied to register it. However this did not negate my rights to it and Chrysler simply did not do their homework and search everywhere as to if someone else was using it. Or they thought they were so powerful they could brush aside people like me.
I feel that when Busbridge contacted them, ( and don't forget I took him on as an agent in eraly 1988 so any connection (as my agent) goes to that date) it is entirely possible that they then did do some exploring of the UK car trade and if so, they would have seen straight away that I had a powerful claim to it and that Busbridge DID NOT. For instance I did the 1987 London Car Show at Earls Court which is where I got the multi million pound order from Japan. So any decent person would say that I was perfectly legally the user of that Mark. He was unable to produce ANY evidence that he had used it IN ANY WAY prior to Feb/March 1988 when I licensed him to use my mark as my London agent.
I believe that they then decided that the easiest way to get rid of me was to use Busbridge to smear my name with accusations that I had committed forgery when I produced a copy of the license I gave Busbridge in 1989 a proof that any claims he was making that he owned the mark were a lie and completely false. He of course colluded with them over this.
One also has to take into consideration that Chrysler are obviously an American company and so many such companies are thoroughly corrupt and will do anything to get their own way. Understand this if you will; they had made their Viper sports car in the States and then they decided to sell it in Europe. No American company would do that if they did not expect to be able to sell many Vipers. They would not have taken such steps to just sell a few and to be able sell they would need to register the Mark Viper in ALL the European countries. In all the countries in Europe they would meet no resistance to doing this as no one else was using the mark there. In the UK they met resistance from Busbridge in the first instance and then me when I found out what he and they were up to and this in 1992.
I believe that they thought that if they first of all got rid of me with the help of Busbridge, (as I obviously had the stronger claim to the Mark) then they would have no trouble to get rid of him as he was standing on quicksands as he could show no evidence that would be accepted as real proof as to his bona-fide ownership. To do this they had to get my opposition to them registering the Mark, heard first.
The trouble for them was, that I believe that the IPO should have actually given Busbridge first shot at opposing their application, as he applied shortly before me to oppose them.  (And that fact should in no way make it that he had the stronger claim as the IPO later on claimed for any claim to a T/M should rest solely on who used it first and not who applied to register it first) Now the thing was they did not do that but gave ME first shot and the hearing in 1995 was held with them using Busbridge as their supposed witness against me and using these false allegations of forgery. Why did this happen in this order, one has to ask?
So the most way they did this was through the London based Intellectual lawyers that Chryslers were using at that time. Throughout all the time I have been involved in this thoroughly corrupt tale I have seen that many intellectual property law companies are up to their necks in it with the IPO. I do not believe that when you have a situation were lawyers are in constant contact with such a governmental organisation as the IPO, that they are not going to make cosy alliances and arrangements with the IPO. This so that cases can be conducted in an easy alliance in such a way as can only be done in such a place like England. Let us not forget that we are dealing here with the UK Establishment, with its Public schoolboy set and their "you scratch my back and I will scratch yours" and all that kind of stuff. IP lawyers will want an easy life and so will the civil servant lot in the IPO, who in the top ranks will have similar backgrounds to their lawyer buddies in the law firms.
So I believe that Chrysler will have told their lawyers to fix it so that someone high up in the IPO makes sure that the rules are bent in Chryslers favour. WHAT OTHER EXPLANATION IS THERE FOR THE IPO TO HAVE PUT ME IN FIRST TO OPPOSE CHRYSLER WHEN BUSBRIDGE SHOULD HAVE BEEN OPPOSING THEM FIRST????
However to get the IPO to direct me to have my opposition application heard first is against their own rules as the first application should be heard first, but had that happened it would have almost certainly failed for Busbridge for as I have said-he had no case. He would have then been cast out of the way for good and then Chrsylers would still have had to deal with my bona-fide application with its strong irrefutable evidence of first usage of the mark.
If you read all the evidence of what has gone on since that first fateful opposition hearing you will see time and again that the IPO and its corrupt officials have taken steps to thwart me. Breaking the rules again and again. The only possible explanation for the perplexing questions of; "why did the IPO make all these corrupt actions just to make sure I had my registration taken away from me after I had gained registration"
You may say "well you did gain registration and so how did that happen of the IPO was so corrupt and in the pay of Chrsyler?" Well you see that hearing which Chrysler thought they had in the bag, actually went against them. I believe that the hearing officer who heard that case in 1995 was not obeying orders to find against me and that put the cat amongst the pigeons. ( you might say he was an incorruptible civil servant) Why do I think this is what happened? Well you have to look at a few remarks that have slipped out along the way and have been made by IPO officials. Like the remark that was made by Judge Hobbs to Busbridge in his later hearing where he colluded with the IPO head manager, a Mr James, to swing that hearing totally in Busbridges favour, give him all the corrupt help and ideas as to how he should proceed so that the IPO could then swing things around and back to his favour and enable him to proceed and complete his stealing of my trade mark. He (Hobbs)alluded the the travesty of that hearing of mine against Chrysler, in 1995 and what he really meant was that it had not gone the way that Chrysler and the IPO had wanted it to. The hearing Hobbs heard, you will see if you have read all this blog or my book was heard because another straight hearing officer actually, at yet another hearing found for me a pointed out that Busbridge had no rights to the mark and for several reasons. So Busbridge had to appeal this or get knocked out completely AND the IPO just had to find reasons and ways in which to correct matters for them and Chrysler. They set this hearing up with a thoroughly in their pocket Judge, to advise Busbridge how he could take steps to circumvent the previous judgement that he lost and thus get back on track and that way the IPO could swing things their way and for him and Chrysler. Thus getting rid of me at last.
Because of the cock-up of me winning the 1995 opposition hearing against Chrysler, the IPO had to go through the motions of giving me registration and then find reasons to take it back off me. (you will have to read all the history to see how all that was done and why.) I believe that someone high up was paid a back hander and it could have been more than one person that was paid off by Chrsyler, no doubt through their lawyer, and this too meant that all those implicated would be scared shitless that they would be found out. That would mean that it was imperative that they destroyed me and my business, so as to get rid of me. You can see that this was on their minds by the remarks the hearing officer made in that last hearing in 2010 when they completed their dirty deeds and against all the overwhelming evidence against them and Busbridge....and stripped me of my legally registered trade mark.
You can also see how the IPO have worked to stop me getting Justice when they colluded with the thoroughly corrupt Met Police to block my attempts to get the Met to investigate the forgery and perjury of Busbridge at ALL the 8 hearings that took place and the Trial I had to undergo in 2000.
You may say that I am dreaming and making all this up and these kind of things just do not go on. If you think that, then it is you who is the dreamer who simply is not living on this planet. For now it is all out and quite clear just what goes on with all the rotten corrupt civil servants, the Police and especially the Met Police, who have been taking bribes for years off the media and others. If they are capable of doing that, then a simple case of taking back handers off another corrupt American global company who will do anything for the bottom Dollar, is complete chicken feed and VERY probable. For the facts of this case contains so many FACTS that are inexplicable and can only be explained by something having gone on in such a way as I have outlined above and in my book "Justice Denied" and other places in this blog.

Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 66.

The Intellectual Property Office which is yet another governmental body of asshole civil servants who are never wrong and who have things so well wrapped up that no one member of the British Public (apart from rich ones)can ever get Justice against, when these bastards decide they are going to do you over.
This is what this whole blog is about (in case you haven't been reading it from the start in 2008). They of course decided for reasons best known to them that they would allow a conman to steal all my IP, thus ruining my whole life. (as outlined in this blog).
Now, on idly searching the web under "Complaints against the IPO" I could see website after website set up by these assholes. ( I make no apology for calling them assholes, either) Amongst the many websites they show are some that highlight that if one is not happy with the IPO, there are procedures by which one can make complaints about them. Seeing that you would think that this is all very fair and you will be safe.
Let me tell you the truth. I have used these so called safe guards many times and they are a con on the Public. They are a set up and designed to go through all the motions that a complaints procedure is being carried out, but the outcome is predetermined against you ever winning. No Sir!! I have even complained to their CEO's (three different ones at different times as they seem to change them frequently) Even though I laid out in very clear terms with evidence, that I had been dumped on and that the IPO's own laws had been disregarded and broken, most of what I said was ignored and the rest twisted so as to appear that nothing wrong had ever happened. So you get nowhere. AND there is really no way you can appeal to anyone 100% INDEPENDENT!!
You can ultimately complain to the Parliamentary Ombudsman, but what in REALITY is he?? Well they would have you believe that they ARE independent, but they are LIARS. For all these people are, are yet ANOTHER BUNCH OF LYING, CORRUPT AND TWISTED CIVIL SERVANTS only there to protect their fellow civil servants. For they do exactly the same as anyone in the IPO does and that is ignore your evidence of wrongdoing, make loads of excuses on behalf of their brothers in arms and all this takes 6-9 months before you get your inevitable whitewash letter rejecting all your complaints and evidence. WELCOME TO JUSTICE 'BRITISH STYLE' RUN BY THE VERY PEOPLE YOU PAY TO KEEP IN EXISTENCE, IN THEIR CUSHY JOBS WITH EARLY RETIREMENT ON HUGE PENSIONS....THEY ARE ALL ASSHOLES AND SHOULD BE AS JEREMY CLARKSON SAID....SHOT IN FRONT OF THEIR FAMILIES. (For Treason and crimes against the British Public)

Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 65.

THE ICO

A few posts back I told you about how the Information Commissioners Office had dealt with my complaints about the IPO, the Met and the Dorset Police had refused to release to me documents that had been created after I had asked the Police to investigate Busbridge for forgery and perjury.
Of course the ICO are EXACTLY the same as all other quangoes and departments set up by government to give the illusion that if you are steam rollered over by a government body, you can at least go to some commissioner or other body to get redress. ITS ALL A SHAM AND NON OF THESE BODIES DO ANYTHING OTHER THAN PROTECT THE VERY BODIES YOU COMPLAIN ABOUT.......this is laughingly known as DEMOCRACY!!! If you believe in these bodies then your stupid and should be put away for your safety.
I know that the IPO sent DC Brimicombe of Dorset Police an email in which they supposedly gave him advice on whether perjury and forgery had been committed in their hearings. I know that because this oaf of a slimeball copper, told me he'd received this advice. Now how did he receive it?.......obviously through the email that the IPO said they were going to send him with this advice on it!!! Isn't that crystal clear? Yet it isn't apparently to the ICO. The IPO gave me copies of various emails etc but not this crucial email which they refuse to even comment on. The Dorset Police told the ICO that it had been destroyed so that proves its existence.
Yet in their latest letter to me today the ICO say "there is no strong evidence that it holds the disputed email now, if indeed it were ever held"
Now that statement just shows you how cynical these bastards are. First of all the IPO gave me copies of a few emails etc dating back years, yet miraculously now the ICO are hinting that this ONE EMAIL may not be around anymore! If it isn't then it has been cynically destroyed by the IPO so they cannot release it and this being the same as the DPS say they did to it. (If either ever did do this)
Then the cynical ICO hint that it just may be a figment of my imagination, and one has to ask, where did they get that idea from???? Yet why would the IPO tell Brimicombe they would send him this email with all the info in it that he'd asked for, and then not send it and why did this man then tell me he'd got all this info off the IPO and because of what he was told he would not investigate Busbridge. No doubt he was also told by the IPO I was a trouble maker, a nuisance, a nutter etc etc ad nauseam!! Hence why both the IPO & the DPS refused to let me see this email and now we have the ICO even saying they doubt it ever existed.... the bastards. So how can anyone have any faith that they are neutral and not as corrupt as all the other bastards in this story????
Then of course let us not forget that there was also another document, either a letter or an email that the IPO would have sent the Met in which they gave the same advice on me and all those hearings and whether perjury and forgery were committed.
The ICO ignored that complaint by me when I complained about the Met, just like they have done with the IPO & the DPS......what a corrupt shower.
These latest documents from the ICO to me and mine to them will show you all and will be put on this blog along with all the other documents.
This latest letter from the ICO was in reply to my complaint to them about their decision document of the 12th July, in which they exonerated the IPO and the DPS of all that I had complained about. I complained that many things I had said had been ignored and that I wanted them to answer my questions about that. Of course what happens when you ask specific questions to civil servants THEY ALWAYS IGNORE THEM AS IF YOU'D NEVER EVEN ASKED THEM. You will see this on those documents as I have notated on the copy of my letter where these questions have been ignored. You will also see that both the Freedom of Information Act and the Data Protection Acts are a completed farce and another con on the Public of Britain. You can ask for documents but if they will incriminate any civil servants you will not get them and you will be fed a whole bunch of excuses and be given so called parts of these acts, that allegedly give them the right to withhold what you seek. SO WHAT IS THE POINT OF THESE ACTS, I ASK????? Also you would have to be a good lawyer to know if what they tell you about these alleged parts of the Acts, are actually the truth or just made up. So they know that you as a non lawyer, will never know if you are being conned.

Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 64.

THE MET POLICE AGAIN.

If you have been reading all the publicity over the weekend about the Met you will know that the head of this useless and corrupt shower, Paul Stephenson has resigned. So he should and this is the ***t that ignored my letter to him about the corrupt goings on between his men at Camden and the IPO. The conniving and colluding in order to stop me from getting justice over Busbridges criminal activities.
You will remember also that both corrupt bodies refused to release to me the incriminating documents that would have proved that they were corrupt and indulging in ILLEGAL ACTIVITES by colluding together to deny me justice.
So I am heartedly glad he's gone the bastard. I hope he and that other twerp Yates, rot in hell, but then both will still get their gold plated HUGE pensions etc and will now be able to live the life of Riley, so they will not mind one bit, I am sure!
THE DICTIONARY STATES:- CORRUPT...lacking in integrity, open to or involving in bribery or other dishonest practices, putrid or rotten....CORRUPTION, the act of corrupting or state of being corrupt...dishonesty. So those of you who probably think I use this word with gay abandon, think again! I think that my constant use of this word is entirely justified, as I use it in the context of describing the goings on of ALL the government departments that I have been forced to have to go to and then have to put up with their rotten acts of corrupt practices.
Certainly the Met are the most corrupt police force in the UK and always have been. However other forces are also corrupt too, like my local force the Dorset Shower. Not many people in Dorset have much good to say about them, either and you should read my link to the website called Dorset police.Then you will see some of the goings on they get up to. Same as the Met but on a smaller scale.

Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 63.

THE CORRUPT LIARS OF THE MET AND THE USELESS CIVIL SERVANTS OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONERS OFFICE, WHO LIKE THE IPCC SEEM ONLY TO BE IN EXISTENCE TO PROTECT THE POLICE AND THE IPO. SO THEY TOO ARE CORRUPT BECAUSE IT IS OBVIOUS THAT THEY ARE DOING THIS KNOWINGLY AND DELIBERATELY. THUS PROTECTING THE POLICE AND DENYING ME JUSTICE

How many of you have watched those wretched Met Coppers on TV blagging and lying their way through the MP's questioning them. What an utter shower they all are.

Now folks this is coming from the very same mob of bastards that HAMPERED MY TRYING TO GET JUSTICE AND MY ASKING THEM TO INVESTIGATE BUSBRIDGES FORGERY AND PERJURY!! Talk about HYPOCRITES and what did they do, but hamper my efforts and in collusion with the IPO. Is it any wonder I couldn't get them to act on irrefutable evidence when they just went and colluded with another bunch of civil servants?

THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONERS OFFICE.
A few posts back I told you about how the ICO to whom I had complained about the Met and the Dorset Police, the IPO and the Parliamentary Ombudsman, all hiding from me documents that they all sent each other when I had tried to get the Met to investigate Busbridge. It really only involved TWO documents that I definitely knew existed. One the email the IPO sent Sgt Brimicombe of Dorset Police and two, the advice the IPO gave Sgt Downs at Camden Station to HELP him refuse to investigate. He admits in an email which is on this blog, that they gave him this advice.
In both cases I believe that the IPO will have disseminated to both the DPS & the Met, lies about whether forgery and perjury had been committed. I am also sure that they will have thrown in a load of derogatory remarks about me on a personal level.
This ICO mob gave me their decision re the Dorset Police a few weeks ago and how they were a bunch of whiter than white darlings who had done absolutely no wrong. I wrote about that a few posts back. Today I got their decisions about my complaints that all had refused me under the FOIAct and the DPAct and I talk now about the IPO & the Met.
The ICO have deliberately misread my complaints about both parties and in both cases they have twisted the requests I gave them in such a way as to be able to say that what I had asked for, was not able to be given to me. Yet what they say I had asked for is not what I had asked for, as I in the course of writing to both the Met & the IPO had honed my request down to those two specific documents. Originally I had asked for any documents they had that concerned me and in the case of the IPO what they had said to the Met and in the Mets case what they had said to the IPO or had received off the IPO and I specifically mentioned this one document. (the advice that the IPO gave Sgt Downs.)
In the case of the IPO I was specific about the email that they admitted they would send to the DPS. Yet what they, the ICO have done is spoken to the IPO and obviously have been fed lies by them which is what they do all the time. They try to say I did not apply under the right Act when the fcat is that I applied for the same under BOTH Acts and they say that information I had asked for could be openly seen under the Trade Marks journals which are open to the Public. This is a complete lie as what I asked for had nothing to do with any of the 8 hearings, so would never be found on any files open to the public. This is how these bastards work, by lying all the time and giving the ICO excuses so they can find for their mates in another government department. They are all shagging each other these civil servant bastards and covering up for each other.
In the case of the Met I even had to pay £10 in order to get any info off them under the DPAct. Yet when do the ICO even mention this so it's as if I am being told I did not apply under the right Act.
In both requests to the IPO & the Met I had simply asked to see both these documents which would have had in them matters to do with my request to get the Met to investigate all the forgery and perjury Busbridge had committed. All my letters about this are on this blog, so you can see for yourself what I asked for. Then the ICO deliberately complicate matters by constantly switching their remarks from one Act to the other and back again. The fact that there are TWO Acts that basically deal with matters that I think are the same. Some idiot in Parliament who thought up these Acts (in order to fool the Public that you could actually make civil servants give up incriminating documents) has I think deliberately made matters in such a way that the powers can obfuscate in all sorts of ways and tie you up in knots over what Act are you asking under? That is why I asked the same questions under BOTH Acts and they still lie through their back teeth and refuse you those documents. The whole thing is yet another sham and con on the Public.
In my case they have deliberately refused to give me those documents and the ICO have backed them up and as it is obvious the ICO have talked to the IPO it is also obvious that the IPO have given them a pack of lies. You can see how the ICO have been indoctrinated by the IPO as on the beginning of their decision document on the IPO, they state on page 2, under 'BACKGROUND', in 3 paragraphs, remarks about subject matter that I did not give the ICO. This is because they detail that I had a long running dispute involving trade marks etc etc, which they can only have got from some IPO mouthpeice. None of that is any business of the ICO and has absolutely no bearing on what I had asked to be divulged, as you will see from what I had asked to see. This proves beyond doubt that the ICO have been heavily involved in discussions about me on a personal level and with departments that I am complaining about. ONCE MORE THE IPO HAVE INDOCTRINATED ANOTHER GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT THAT I HAVE GONE TO TO GET JUSTICE.....OTHERS INCLUDE THE DPS, THE MET, THE PARLIAMENTARY OMBUDSMAN AND SO ON.IT IS ALL A SHAM AND DISGRACEFUL and they are able to get away with it, time and again. They wouldn't if I were rich!
Their remark that I have been 'involved in a long running dispute' is said by them, to make me out as a litigious person. Yet who started all the legal actions?..ROBERT BUSBRIDGE, IN 2002 WHEN HE APPLIED TO REGISTER THE MARK THAT I OWNED AND AT THE SAME TIME APPLIED TO HAVE MY TRADE MARK MADE INVALID. ENOUGH SAID????
Now that is pretty well all the actions I could take to get Justice and they have run their course. I will next week get all the latest documents onto this blog and you can read for yourself what has gone on in my latest efforts to get Justice from a number of quarters. (The Attorney General and the ICO.) I will type out explanation remarks for each document that has been lately generated.
There will also be documents from my battle to get the Attorney General to get the Police to investigate Busbridges forgery and perjury. You will be able to see what that bastard is all about too. Another useless sickening ***** filling his pockets with Public money and refusing to help those who he is supposed to serve and by a litany of excuses and outright lies. Yet another civil servant covering up for his fellow tossers. You will see how devious he and his minion McGinty has lied as laid out in my recent post. How I am told over and over how he cannot involve himself, but tucked away I am told that if I can prove by evidence I send him, then he could take steps, yet when I do exactly that all I get is a continuation of excuses. It is all there in black and white if you care to read it all.

Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 62.

NICK HERBERT THE POLICE MINISTER.

You will see on this blog that I have written a detailed book (Justice Denied) on the whole of this sordid story of IP theft by Robert Busbridge, how I was treated by endless corrupt and useless government civil servants who sided with this conman and who then stripped me of my IP and gave it to the crook Busbridge. How I then have tried to get Justice to absolutely no effect by the following entities:-
The IPO, The Police, the IPCC, the Justice Minister Ken Clarke, The Attorney General, plus
a host of MP's including my own useless tosser, Chope and so on-ad nauseam. I wrote this book 'Justice Denied' because as I am not rich I could not afford to go to law to try and get Justice. If I had been rich none of this would have happened anyway as I would have stopped it 20 years ago by using the best law brains in IP. I also decided the book should be sent to as many influencial people and bodies as possible, and I will be commentating in the next post on who I sent the book to and how it has been receiveda nd how successful I have or have not been.
For now this post is about one of those MP's one Nick Herbert the Minister for Police. I wanted him to be able to see what the organisation he should be responsible for have done to me. So off went the book with a covering letter. Today I got the book back with a covering letter which once again tells you how our governments think about the people who put them where they are and pays their overblown wages. How they really hold us in contempt, for what they do amounts to this and insults us further. My letter to Herbert and the reply I got from one of his faceless organ monkies will shortly go onto this blog, along with all the backlog that has built up of other documents of recent times, all from similar useless costly bodies of unctuous civil servants.

" The Minister receives so much correspondence that he is unable to reply personally to all those who write to him" So it starts straight away with a put down for this was no ordinary letter....IT WAS A LONG BOOK ON A VERY SERIOUS MATTER OF CORRUPTION WHICH INCLUDED THE VERY BODY HE IS SUPPOSED TO BE IN CONTROL OF!!WHICH OBVIOUSLY HAD TAKEN THE WRITER A LONG TIME TO WRITE AND HAVE PRINTED, AT NO SMALL COST. OBVIOUSLY ALL THAT HAS GONE OVER THE EMPTY HEAD OF THIS TOSSER, OR HE IS BEING THE USUAL CYNICAL SERVANT THEY ALL SEEM TO BE?

The writer then goes into a typical civil service, wafflespeak load of tripe, in which they make all sorts of excuses rather than give you a result. I will not repeat it all here, for it is all irrelevant trash. I say this for HE IS CALLED THE MINISTER FOR POLICE. Now what should that tell us?????? The writer, another McGinty character seems to think the Minister has no control over the Police at all, so what the hell is he for, I ask? This one goes by the handle of B.McGuire of no known gender and the letter is headed The Home Office.

The very same shower who sent me a letter some months back telling me that if the Police did not investigate it was tough shit mate! They are a force unto themselves AND NO ONE CAN CONTROL THEM!! I was to take my own legal action !!!!!!!!!

This is why we are forever being assailed, almost on a daily basis, of lurid stories about how the Police have failed one poor family after another. If it isn't useless coppers cocking up an important murder investigation, they are indulging in yet more corruptness, as in today's story about how more than 8 bastards stitched up 4 innocent men for murder and are now belatedly being done themselves. To messing up the Dowler investigation and to sitting on the facts about the NOTW phone hacking story, because they were all getting back handers. The very same old firm of the Met who colluded with the IPO to stop me getting justice!!

My point in this post is that this useless overpaid tosser Nick Herbert...what is he for and why is it that his Organ Grinder Monkies are deliberately keeping from him a story that HE SHOULD KNOW ABOUT? (they probably got straight onto the phone to their IPO mates to see what it was all about and were told to bury it)......DON'T THEY MAKE YOU SICK.

Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 61.

WHAT DID I SAY TO YOU ABOUT THE ICO?????

I have now got their decision letter about my complaint about the Dorset Police Service and them not handling my request for information under the FOIA and the DPA.
You will have to go back to my posts about all that and see the attached emails and letters from me to them and vice versa.
They behaved disgracefully in the way they handled my request and basically put two fingers up to me, which is the norm these days for the Police wherever. Even a complaint to their Chief and the IPCC as you will also know from previous posts-got me absolutely nowhere.
This latest exercise in utter futility has gone exactly the same way. With yet another government department/quangoe refusing to act and siding with their bretheren fellow civil servants. The writer said that "It is likely that the DPS has complied with the requirements of the DPA" Now I don't know about you, but that is definitely not an unequivical statement made, because the writer has evidence they did. It is a wishy washy statement that one could say that equally it is unlikely they didn't. It is obvious that the ICO did not receive from the Dorset Police Service any evidence that the DPS did 100% act within the requirements of the Data Protection Act, as I am sure if they had, they would have said so in a firmer statement. In other words we are giving the benefit of the doubt to the Police because that is how we work. We do not work on behalf of complainents (the Public that is) we work for our fellow civil servants.
All my evidence that I was treated like SHIT by this lying copper Shaun Waldbridge, by him failing to deal with my request in the laid down proper manner and within DPA/FOIA rules, was cast aside and ignored as usual.
Then this Kelly Steen who wrote this garbage, further shows us all just how corrupt even her department is, by saying that the DPS 'appeared likely that they have provided you with the information held about you at the time of your request. Now as this simply did not happen we have to take it that again the ICO has seen no evidence that they did, because again they can only manage another limp 'well it is LIKELY etc etc' IT SIMPLY IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH AND IT IS EXACTLY WHAT I EXPECTED OF THEM.
Then Miss Steen compounds her uselessness by going onto state 'They have confirmed that the emails had been deleted by the time of your request'. Now what this is referring to is the ONE email I knew the IPO had sent DS Brimicombe, in which the IPO would have well and truly slagged me off and warned the DPS what a wanker I was and a trouble maker and not to have anything to do with me, let alone show me the email that would damn them all.
NOW DO NOT FORGET THAT BOTH THE DPS AND THE IPO HAVE BOTH REFUSED TO DIVULGE THIS EMAIL, NO DOUBT A DAMNING EMAIL, WHICH WOULD HANG THEM ALL.....THE ABSOLUTE BASTARDS.
What you should know is that as soon as I had got hold of the email that told me that a further email would be forthcoming to the DPS from the IPO, I asked to see it. That would be within no more than a week or so of my getting from that DS Brimicombe, a copy of the first email from the IPO to DS Brimicombe, because he left the email in my dossier that I'd given him. So are we to believe that the Police routinely get rid of all incoming emails within days of receiving them?...pull the other one. So it is yet more Police lying and the ICO going along with it.
This duplicitous Steen woman then goes into a protection mode of making excuses about how long organisations are allowed to keep emails etc before they trash them. We have to believe going on this case and what is claimed to have happened to that email, that it is only for a few days, and I simply do not belive that.
So what this means is that all three of my other requests to the ICO re the withheld documents, withheld by the Parliamentary Ombudsman, the Met Police and the IPO themselves, will end up the exact same way this has. Each organisation will trot out excuses and the ICO will back them and defend them with a litany of lying excuses.
What makes me so mad with all the government bodies that we the Public are supposed to be able to use to obtain justice against the civil service trash departments that shaft us and lie to us and side with the very people we are complaining about, are all sitting there in their vast offices all paid for by the Public purse. They consume millions of pounds of our money doing absolutely nothing. Shuffling peices of paper around making it look like they are seriously taking up complaints. When all the time, all it is is window dressing, smoke and mirrors to fool us that indeed there are organistions that will help us when we get done over by lying, useless, duplicious civil servants!! What a cesspit of iniquity the Establishment of this country are. I have said it before and I will say it again. There is no democracy in this country, no freedoms and we really live in a country no better that any dictators country or any banana Replublic. Yet these POLITICIAQNS RANT AND RAVE AT THE ASSADS AND GADAFFI'S OF THIS WORLD WHEN THEY DO TO THEIR PUBLIC THE SAME AS WE REALLY DO TO OURS. The only difference is that here the trash Politicians do it in a much more sophisticated way. They do not bump people off or make them disappear, but they just block any attempts to use the systems we are told should give us JUSTICE. It all goes back to what I have said time and again....IN THIS ROTTEN COUNTRY YOU ONLY GET JUSTICE IF YOU CAN AFFORD IT!! EVEN THEN THEY CAN STILL BLOCK YOU IF THEY WANT, BY JUST MAKING SURE YOU WILL GET A JUDGE WHO IS IN THEIR PAY LIKE JUDGE HOBBS.....(Refer to my previous posts on him and how that bumbling oaf Clarke refused to investigate his corruption (despite the evidence) and the way he manipulated the appeal hearing he was supposed to hear, in collusion with the IPO, so as to block my getting justice and showing how corrupt and useless the IPO really are.)