Showing posts with label Corrupt CPS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Corrupt CPS. Show all posts

Wednesday, 18 October 2017

Corrupt Police & The Justice System-stopping me getting Justice. 77.

        THOSE INTENDING TO READ THE ABOVE VIDEO SHOULD READ THIS FIRST. 

In this blog you will have seen posts where I have outlined the worst event in the 18 year history of  7 Tribunal hearings and 1 County Court case that were inflicted upon me by the IPO. That was the bogus alleged Appeal Hearing held in 2005 before a Appointed Person (acting as a judge as it were) The actions of Hobbs QC was that he unlawfully gave a long session of advice giving and this was dressed up as an Appeal Hearing against a previous hearing, that my ex agent Busbridge had lost and allegedly was appealing.

THE VIDEO I HAVE MADE WHERE I OUTLINE IN DETAIL WHAT WENT ON AT THAT HEARING, IS NOW TO BE SEEN ON THIS BLOG-ABOVE AND ON THE RIGHT- JUST CLICK ON THAT VIDEO AND GET THE FACTS LEADING UP TO AND ON THE BOGUS MEETING, HOW IT WAS UNLAWFUL AND THE RAMIFICATIONS THAT HIT ME AFTER. IT LASTS NEARLY 2 HOURS BUT THAT IS BECAUSE THERE ARE A LOT OF FACTS. THOSE REALLY INTERESTED IN HOW OUR STATE STUFFS UP PEOPLE, WILL NOT MIND TAKING THIS AMOUNT OF TIME TO VIEW IT....ESPECIALLY THOSE WHO HAVE IP THEY HAVE TO PROTECT, OR ARE BEING 'STUFFED' THEMSELVES IN ANYWAY BY ANY DYSFUNCTIONAL AND OR CORRUPT GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT. FOR THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT CAN HAPPEN TO YOU-YOUR LIFE-YOUR I/P-YOUR BUSINESS AND ALL PERPETRATED BY THE VERY GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT THAT IS SUPPOSED TO HELP THE PUBLIC WHO HAVE GENERATED IP................... FOR THEY ARE INCOMPETENT-USELESS AND CORRUPT AND YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO GET ANY JUSTICE AGAINST THEM 
                                   

                                  ......WHEN THEY "STUFF YOU UP"........ 

I have pointed out ad nauseum how in this country, if you are not rich you cannot get Justice and here, this was the case. That Hobbs QC guy and James the IPO legal Manager who also was present (and should not have been there at all) should have been taken by me to court for Criminal Acts they perpetrated. How could I afford to do that? The Police refused to act in 2010/11 as also can be seen in previous posts. The Justice Ministry also lied and in effect refused to act.....A CLASSIC CASE OF THE UK ESTABLISHMENT COVERING UP MISDEEDS AND REFUSING TO GIVE A PERSON JUSTICE.

A couple of months ago, I approached a so called Charity? called Bar Probono in London to get legal advice on this meeting and the criminal acts and how I could get justice. They put any approach to them, to Barristers who will look at your case and give this advice..............THE BIG PROBLEM HERE AS IN MY CASE.........I AM TRYING TO GET JUSTICE AGAINST ANOTHER BARRISTER. SO I KNEW THAT IT NO DOUBT, WOULD BE YET ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF HOW THE ESTABLISHMENT WOULD NOT BE HONEST AND WOULD LIE IN ORDER TO NOT GIVE THE HONEST INDEPENDENT ADVICE THAT I NEEDED !!

A few days ago I eventually got their reply and it was exactly as I had expected.....an exercise of covering the back of another Establishment member....another Barrister. (Hobbs QC) This is what I was told:- "The barrister who reviewed your application did not consider your case had sufficient chances of success to justify asking one of our volunteer barristers to assist" He then went on to say "In the criminal courts the standard of proof for an allegation of criminal conspiracy to pervert the course of justice is high and it is difficult to see how any motive could be proved" Oh, and is this all one has to prove when a criminal act is committed????? Utter bullshit- So the transcript of what went on at that alleged hearing is not proof of anything. That they were openly giving a claimant advice on how to overturn a decison could not be openly seen in that transcript.

THAT A BARRISTER HAD GIVEN ME HIS THOUGHTS ON THAT HEARING, AS YOU CAN SEE ON A PREVIOUS POST. HE HAD NO DIFFICULTY TO SEE WHAT HAD GONE ON WAS NOT LAWFUL. NO IT'S A CASE OF BARRISTERS DON'T WANT TO TAKE ON OTHER BARRISTERS.

IT'S ALL THEM COVERING THEIR BARRISTER MATES BACKSIDES-THE OLD BOY NETWORK AT WORK. NOW TH BARRISTER WHO GAVE ME HIS OPINION WAS 'SOUTH AFRICAN' AND DIDN'T MUCH LIKE THE BRITISH ESTABLISHMENT.

Well he obviously thinks I am but an idiot, who does not know the law in a case like this.....for the BASTARDS PUT ME THROUGH A TWO WEEK COURT CASE ON EXACTLY THE SAME CHARGES ...PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE AND WAY BACK IN 2000. THEN THE POLICE AND CPS AND JUSTICE SYSTEM HAD NO PROBLEMS IN DOING WHAT THEY DID TO ME.....(A POST ON ALL THAT CAN BE SEEN- AND THERE WAS NEVER ANY MENTION IN THEIR EVIDENCE PUT AGAINST ME ....OF ME HAVING ANY MOTIVE!!! BUT THEN I AM NOT A BARRISTER !!!!! AND WHAT MOTIVE COULD I HAVE HAD IN THAT PARTICULAR CASE ??? HENCE WHY I WAS EASILY PROVEN TO BE INNOCENT.

This waffle about proving motive is a nonsense because; say one is accused of murder, does a motive to murder have to be proved in order to go ahead and charge someone with murder? For murders are committed daily these days where yobs/immigrants and lowlife are murdering people they don't even know and therefore can have NO MOTIVE.....they just do it as they are out of control arseholes. However in this case I can actually prove motive, but did not say so as it was irrelevant to what I was asking for. WHICH WAS:- I only asked that a barrister looked at whether the meeting was a bona-fide appeal hearing/was it obvious that despite giving legal advice in ANY hearing in ANY court of law, being unlawful, the legal entity holding that meeting-obviously GAVE A BUCKET LOAD OF ADVICE and if he/she agreed that those two points were as I said they were....how could I go on and get justice??? Take note here, I did not even mention a criminal conspiracy having taken place or me taking it to any court! So you see what was said WAS YET ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF HOW OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM AND MOST IN IT ARE THOROUGHLY CORRUPT. However I am not finished yet- IN MY BATTLE TO FIND JUST-one honest LAWYER and one not afraid of the Establishment and willing to give me an opinion!!

TO EXPAND:-For what I had asked Bar Prono is to look at the transcript of that bogus meeting and either agree with me that (A) It was a bogus appeal as no grounds for having one where given (B) at the meeting no discussions of any grounds that were given were discussed as they should have been; that (C) the whole meeting was obviously set up to GIVE ADVICE TO BUSBRIDGE SO HE COULD CARRY OUT THAT ADVICE AND EVENTUALLY STEAL MY TRADE MARK WITH THE HELP OF THE IPO (D) THAT WHAT THE APPOINTED PERSON ACTUALLY DID WAS ILLEGAL AS HE HAD BLATANTLY GIVEN LEGAL ADVICE BY THE BUCKET LOAD. (E) That by Busbridge carrying out the advice he was then able to go on and ruin my life and business and I have documentary evidence that was given in the 2010 hearing, which showed that the IPO had all along wanted to take my Trade Mark off me, because they said...."THEY'D MADE A MISTAKE GIVING IT ME". WHAT BETTER MOTIVE CAN THERE BE FOR THE IPO TO HAVE DONE WHAT THEY DID AT THAT CRIMINAL MEETING IN 2005?????? FOR THE EFFECTS OF IT-EVENTUALLY ENABLED THE IPO TO DO WHAT OBVIOUSLY THEY HAD WANTED TO DO FOR SOME YEARS......TO STRIP ME OF MY LEGALLY OBTAINED TRADE MARK THEY HAD GRANTED ME IN 2002....REMEMBER WHAT HEARING OFFICER SALTHOUSE SAID AT THAT HEARING...IT IS IN THIS BLOG ....WORDS TO THE EFFECT OF "It will be as if the Mark had never been granted in the first place" Plus saying that they had made "A MISTAKE IN GRANTING IT TO ME".....ALL TO BE SEEN IN THE TRANSCRIPT OF THAT 2010 UTTERLY CORRUPT HEARING. (Which I have)

That is a clear case of perverting the course of justice and it gives the IPO a MOTIVE for what they did at this BOGUS 2005 MEETING. For after it they had set in motion events they made sure I could not stop and that right up to the 2010 hearing, when they finalised their wish to strip me of my legally gained Trade Mark.

Of course the barrister reviewing my papers and the Transcript, gives me no opinion of what went on in that bogus meeting and the fact it can clearly be seen  (read the damning document and see for yourself) that advice is being given....illegally. That was clearly and exactly what I had asked him to do ....give ONLY an opinion as to the lawfulness etc of the meeting and if he agreed it was bogus and unlawful acts had taken place ....how could I get justice? So Folks; the whole system we have in the GLORIOUS LAW ABIDING COUNTRY OF OURS IS ACTUALLY ROTTEN TO THE CORE. TRYING TO WIN AGAINST OUR ESTABLISHMENT AND WITHOUT HAVING MONEY TO DO SO MEANS YOU ARE

                                             "STUFFED BY THE STATE"


POINTS TO PONDER....HAVE YOU EVER READ OF ANY JUDGE OR BARRISTER OR LAWYER, EVER GETTING CHARGED ...LET ALONE CONVICTED OF ANYTHING APART FROM STEALING CLIENTS MONEY.....WHICH OF COURSE THEY DO???

SO KEEP WATCHING THIS BLOG TO FIND OUT WHERE IF ANYWHERE I GET WITH THIS

           DO TAKE THE TIME TO LOOK AT "STUFFED BY THE STATE" VIDEO.

      ANYONE WISHING TO RAISE QUESTIONS....OFFER ADVICE.... CAN DO SO BY
       CONTACTING ME....DETAILS ON HOW TO ARE ON THIS BLOG IF YOU LOOK
                                               -ON MY PROFILE FACTS-



Sunday, 16 July 2017

Corrupt Police & IPO-how they aided a crook. 73.

IPO = Intellectual Property Office.

This is the thoroughly corrupt mob of unmitigated bastards, who prompted me to start this blog way back in 2008. In 2010 after they helped a criminal steal my Intellectual Property off me, in the form of my Trade Mark applied to a sportscar I manufactured and thus ended that business. I went to the equally corrupt Dorset Police to try to get them to investigate the massive amount of perjury that the IPO refused to deal with. All perpetrated by the crook called BUSBRIDGE.

I knew that the DORSET POLICE had spoken at length to the IPO and also sent and received emails about me. I saw one of them, when the thick cop mistakenly sent me a copy. So under the Freedom of Information Act, I requested all copies of all letter and emails that went betwen the two of them. Plus details of phone calls. As is usual with ALL our corrupt institutions they only sent me a couple; one of which was the one already sent me by mistake by plod.

Now today I was looking through my records and came across those they disclosed and you should  think on them, for they show the mindset of not only the IPO, but of course our wonderful Dorset Police. It also show just what I was up against during ALL my dealings, not only with the IPO but then the Dorset Police. I shows just how corrupt all these bastards are and how it is impossible to get justice against them.

First I got a copy of what they call a 'File Note' and this raises the question of:- My dealings with the IPO started in 2002 after Chrysler threw the towel in, after I'd won against their trying to steal my Trade Mark 'Viper'. That meant the IPO now had to give me registration of that. Before that, ALL contact with the IPO was through firstly my Patent Agent and then a lawyer AND NOT ME!!. So direct contact started in 2002 when the IPO, minutes after giving me registration told me they were allowing Busbridge my crook ex agent, who tried to sell MY TRADE MARK to Chrysler for £1/2M saying he owned it !!!! and now the bastard was trying it on through the IPO. Obviously I was very annoyed with the IPO for they knew full well who he was and that he had no legal ownership of that T/M, as he'd been a witness for Chrysler and his involvement with me and the T/M was given in my evidence. Yet here they were allowing him to oppose my recent registration!! WHAT WAS GOING ON ??

After I got his statement of facts, as to why he thought he and not me had ownership of this T/M. I was predictably 'MAD AS HELL' as it was full of lies and forged documents that they had allowed into evidence knowing, given the past history and evidence at the Chrysler hearing, full well it was all lies and not backed up with REAL LEGAL evidence. So on that score I rang the IPO to complain and this is what some jumped up clerk noted about my call:-

Headed "Copy of a filenote Jan 04"........"There is a great deal of history between X (Busbridge my ex agent and a crook).....MR COOK CAN BE VERY DIFFICULT" !!!!! Just get that will you!!!!.If you stand up for your rights against ANY government department civil service shite, you are immediately classed as 'DIFFICULT'. No you should shut-up and say nothing.
For a start how did the IPO know anything about any dealings I'd had between myself and Busbridge before that note was written??????? I had had no direct dealings with Busbridge from 1992 to 2004 over this case as all dealings were through my Patent Agent or a lawyer and they were not endless, so why say 'a great deal'? One wonders if they had dealings with Busbridge behind my back and had listened to all he had to say about me and no doubt slagging me off, or of course, did Chrysler have things to tell them and to try and influence them against me? I would not put that past them.
As the only dealings to then, that the IPO had with me, is when in 2002 I dealt with their CEO a woman called Brimilowe, when I made a formal complaint that they were allowing Busbridge to oppose me, given what I've noted above. All within my rights to do so. Yet here we see that already the IPO was viewing me in a very negative and personal way. They are supposed to be scrupulously independent

I was also given another ' file note' this time dated July 2010 and that was after the IPO has successfully stuck the boot well into me, by taking my Trade Mark off me and don't forget what was said when they did that. For the hearing officer at that time said this :- "It will be as if Mr Cook had NEVER ever been given registration !" and that tells you EXACTLY what the IPO thought of me and how they had manipulated events from 2004 onwards, as recorded in this blog and to get to the position that they could kick me in the teeth and take what I'd previously and legally proved I owned. So you have to read these comments in the light of all that.

For now, they in an email to the Dorset Police who had contacted them (and why did they do that?) when I asked them to investigate all that perjury that the IPO had refused to ever investigate. So they go running to the IPO and they all get together to facilitate the demolition of myself. So they said:-
" Please see the attached document below as requested" (one has to ask why did the DPA ask for my blog details and who told them about it.....the IPO of course and WHY?)," a link to Mr Cook's blog. Some of the entries I found extremely shocking and offensive, so be aware if you do read it" !!!!!!!!!! Incredible!!!!!!

Now all that just shows you how the corrupt DPA and the IPO worked together to demolish me and my rights.....how corrupt is that?? First of all just how did the IPO even know I wrote a blog which up to then was entirely on how they had behaved corruptly and had forced me to go to the police. All is there for one to read if you wish so read all entries before July 2010 and ask yourself....'is any of this shocking and offensive'???? Obviously the IPO are sticking the boot in and intent on making me out to be a MONSTER, because I attacked them and of course in typical civil service attitudes, we have no right to defend our rights and positions!!

What are the IPO were doing here and only God knows what they discussed with the DPA in telephone calls between them? But it is very clear that as I say, they were intent to get the Police not to investigate, by slagging me off and it worked. For the Police TOLD ME THAT THEY WERE AWARE OF MY BLOG AND WHAT WAS IN IT, AS IF I'D BROKEN THE LAW. THAT SAID TO TELL ME THEY THOUGHT I WAS NOT WORTHY OF GETTING AN INVESTIGATION AND INDEED THEY TOLD ME THAT THE IPO HAD SAID THAT PERJURY HADN'T BEEN COMMITTED AND IN ANY CASE IT WAS A 'CIVIL MATTER'.WHICH IS A GROSS LIE!! Thus the Police after slagging me off in a very aggressive manner, refused to investigate......all documented in this blog.

But what I am trying to get over to you after having re-seen these filenotes and comments, is just how corrupt the IPO and Dorset Police of course are and that they stopped at nothing to take my legally owned trade mark off me (that I'd had to prove TO THEM, that I did legally have rights to it, that back in 1996), knowing full well I could not fight back by taking it to the High Court and get the Police to arrest Busbridge for CRIMINAL OFFENSES.

The Dorset Police and the MET Police who also spoke to the IPO over all this, with the same results for me. But worse still, is that I knew full well that there were masses of documents to do with me that they never gave up and they say that they were entitled not to give up certain documents so you wonder what was in those? Many would hold personal comments about me that if I'd seen them could have proved beyond doubt that the IPO were behaving corruptly and were determined that for some reason, they did not want me to ever own that Trade Mark. I have my thoughts as to why that is but will I ever be able WITHOUT THE HELP OF OTHERS, TO GET INTO THEIR RECORDS ON ME AND THIS CASE, AS THEY HAVE THWARTED ALL MY EFFORTS TO DO THIS LEGALLY, AND WITH IMPUNITY.  My efforts to complain about this to the ICO got nowhere as all Ombudsmen are a CON ON THE BRITISH PUBLIC....and that has been the subject of newspaper articles on this corrupt and expensive mob....the ICO.
___________________________________________________________________________________



Now being rich Chrysler used the biggest IP Law firm to represent them, that was around in London. The IP World is a small one and all the big IP lawyers know each other well, as do all those in the IPO. Do you seriously think that the big lawyers representing them, had nothing to say to the high up managers in the IPO law section??? They probably all belonged to the same posh clubs, went to the same Public schools and played golf in the same clubs. That is how the ESTABLISHMENT works all the time. I firmly believe that it was a set up from the beginning, but somehow the Hearing Officer at that hearing when I won against Chrysler, either forgot his script lines and how he was expected to find the case or was an 'honest Joe'. Think I'm dreaming.....then open up the transcript of the Hobbs QC hearing and go to the comments he made about that hearing on pages 33 line 25 and 34 line 1-7.........."I have looked at, as you know, the Registry record. You can get them off the internet with all the case details, the case history.....the long sordid history" Busbridge replies, "I have a couple of those"
Hobbs..."Only a couple, I have the history at the same time relating to Chrysler on a mark (trade) and this looks like a complete and utter mess to me"  
Now reflect on all that for what Hobbs is saying- he has looked at the 'history' and what he is in fact saying is that he has looked at all the papers and decisions made, when I opposed Chysler and won, then when Busbdridge opposed my registration which he corruptly won, but I forced the IPO to look at the legality of some his evidence and another hearing heard all that and by a Hearing Officer; Landau, which  I won. This phony appeal hearing Hobbs was supposed to be hearing, was against the Landau decision.
He is saying that it was all 'a mess and sordid' and it is clear that he thinks that my involvement was 'sordid and a mess' (or maybe he thinks the decision by the HO in 1996 -Chrysler which I won, and the Landau decision which I won was also 'sordid and a mess') It is therefore clear that something here is going on that is very corrupt and ILLEGAL!!

One has to wonder why Hobbs said all that, but I am convinced he had been got at by the IPO and it was all worked out between the IPO and this well known IP lawyer/Judge QC. This phoney appeal hearing was not 'bona-fide', as Busbridge gave no legal grounds to even get an appeal. The IPO needed to act in a way that turned round the Landau decision and how to do this? By setting up a phony appeal hearing where they could give Busbridge all the advice he needed to carry out actions that would allow the IPO to turn it all around. That would then appear to be all kosher. That is exactly what happened and if you read this blog (or the attached book 'Justice denied') in the relevant areas, you will see how Busbridge carried out all the advice that he was given and I eventually ended up in 2010, stripped of my T/M

One should also remind yourself that Hobbs was the biggest I/P Appeal Judge, hearing IPO appeals and cases, where an alleged 'independent appeal officer' would officiate. If you research his case history, he has heard more such cases and big ones than any one, which makes him a person the IPO would be intimately connected to and this phony appeal hearing shows this when you read the way he and James of the IPO talked to each other. Like a pair of close ex school buddies, they were practically having sex with each other!!!!  

Of course all my protestations at what had gone on and my official complaints, were ignored and got nowhere. As my complaints made through the Justice Ministry were swotted down by lies about how any decision made by a Judge could not be altered or complained about. That's a lie for a start as appeals against stupid Judges happen all the time, but here NO DECISION WAS EVER GIVEN AS THE PHONY APPEAL WAS 'DROPPED' BY BUSBRIDGE on Hobbs advice and all he had to do was carry out all the 'advice he'd been given by Hobbs and James helped him do all that, with all the results that can be seen in this blog....BRITISH JUSTICE AT WORK HERE!!!!The justice Ministry when that was pointed out ignored me.



 
   

Wednesday, 24 May 2017

Corrupt Police & IPO-how they aided a crook. 72.

On a post I made back on the 19th April I told how I had sent a letter to Liz Truss the Justice Minister, where I told her how a Judge had trashed my business and life and how I had found it absolutely impossible to get justice through any avenue, including all the complaint procedures within the justice system. How I had been stonewalled at every turn by the Establishment Johnnies who are not interested in real justice, only protecting their fellow cronies.

JUSTICE MINISTER>

Well yesterday I got a reply, but predictably not from her. So some obnoxious civil servant must have way-laid my letter so she never saw it and had not read it properly, as they never do and then thought that some other government department should be given it so as to bury it in someway. So this letter of reply was from the HM Courts & Tribunals, Customer Investigation Section. Don't they make you seeth these modern twerps that infest all of our PC Plonker government departments. They treat you as if they were a BUSINESS and you are a 'CUSTOMER' and as if you had willingly gone to them to get 'SERVICE' of some sort or to buy something.

It was the predictable short reply they always send you, full of lying excuses as to how they can 'Do nothing' then they trot out one lie after another. They have obviously not read your letter and understood what you were saying or more like it, they have deliberately 'misread' it and that has given them the right to then think up lies to excuse them doing nothing. Every avenue I'd already been down previously had used this absolute lie of an excuse:- "the judiciary are constitutionally independent of government and they must be able to make their decisions without interference"
So what this means is any judge can behave in whatever way they want INCLUDING ACTING IN AN UNLAWFUL WAY....BREAKING THE LAWS THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO UPHOLD!!! and they get off Scott free, as they are 'untouchable'. That is obvious BOLLOCKS for they can be charged when they break the law. Very few do for the same reasons I am coming up against. No politician is willing to stand up to them as is no one in the Police or even our rotten Press.

The letter went on:- "It is therefore not possible for a government Minister to comment on or intervene in matters that have been the subject of judicial consideration" Now you can see how slippery they are and how they use this excuse over and over again -TOTALLY IGNORING WHAT I TOLD THEM IN MY LETTER !! The hearing that Judge Hobbs officiated in was an appeal hearing or was supposed to be. Yet no matters to do with any appeal and what the appellant had given that gave him the right to appeal, and its legal merits etc, were ever discussed. Nor was there ANY DECISION EVERMADE!!!! As the appellant had never raised ANY LEGAL REASONS as to how he could even have an appeal which should have been in the statement he gave when asking for an appeal, which he was legally obliged to do, nothing like that was gone into. As I told them the transcript shows clearly that all that the alleged hearing covered, was this judge giving the appellant a bucket load of ADVICE ON HOW HE COULD CIRCUMVENT THE DECISION GIVEN AGAINST HIM THAT HE WAS SUPPOSED TO BE APPEALING. THIS IS ILLEGAL AND CONSTITUTED AN ACT OF PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE. 
SEE ON THE RIGHT OF THIS PAGE WHERE YOU CAN DOWNLOAD THE TRANSCRIPT AND READ IT YOURSELF.

Of course no one has the guts to want to agree on what actually did happen and to stand up against the 'Judicial Mafia'. Including NEWPAPERS!! This woman writer, a Miss Charlotte Green, whoever she is, went on to say that she had tried to trace my case or find what appeal routes I had taken. This just shows you what THICKO'S I am dealing with. For the case was never heard in front of a 'normal' Court but at a Tribunal Hearing under the auspices of the 'TREASURY SOLICITORS' and what's more, as I plainly told Lizz Truss I was not the person who applied to have an appeal hearing, as it was my enemy and ex agent who stole my Trade Mark and business and they denied me access or any say in that hearing!! So it was obvious she would never be able to trace anything through the normal courts records.

She then cheekily advises me to go to the Citizens Advice, who I approached some time ago and predictably it was so far out of their depths it was a farce, as I knew it would be. No solicitor will touch it, you cannot get Legal Aid and in any case hardly any lawyers do Legal Aid these days except for protecting illegal immigrants and terrorists who want to stay in this country, so they can blow up our kids. It all makes me sick as there are lawyers falling over themselves to do that, but protect a Brit from corrupt lawyers and Judges....NO WAY SO GO AWAY!!

Another lying excuse she kept making was "If I wanted to appeal the 'decision' as I was unhappy with the 'decision' etc" When I specifically said in my letter to Truss that NO APPEAL HEARING TOOK  PLACE AND SO NO 'DECISION' WAS EVER MADE AS THE APPELLANT DROPPED HIS APPEAL!!!!!!!! AND THAT AFTER HE'D GOT THE ADVICE TO DO, SO THEN FOLLOW THEIR INSTRUCTIONS AND THEN HIS LIFE WOULD SUDDENLY TURN INTO LIGHT AND ROSES AND HE COULD THEN GO ON AND FINISH OFF HIS ATTEMPTS TO STEAL MY TRADE MARK AND FINISH OFF MY BUSINESS!!!! HOW CORRUPT AND UNLAWFUL IS ALL THAT AND THE DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE IS ALL THERE FOR ALL TO SEE AND SHOWS THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED.

So you have to either think she was as thick as two short planks and could not grasp what I had said.....or more likely she was being her usual civil service devious lying, and twisting what I had said and that meant she could invent lying excuses to do nothing. I HAD HIGHLIGHTED IN CAPITALS THAT NO DECISION HAD EVER BEEN MADE ETC ETC.  Of course this election has stuffed up me being able to go back to the Justice Minister right now and will it even be Miss Truss??  So more time wasted. But as you can see I am a VERY perservering person who will keep going on.

HERE ARE COPIES  OF THOSE THREE LETTERS BETWEEN ME AND LIZ TRUSS MP, THE REPLY FROM MISS GREEN AND MY REPLY TO HER GIVING HER 'WHAT (Is this rubbish you sent me?  )

READING THEM YOU WILL SEE AND GRASP ALL THAT THIS IS ABOUT......HOW THE POLITICIANS, THEIR DEVIOUS PROTECTING CIVIL SERVANTS AND A*******s IN THE SO CALLED JUSTICE SYSTEM, BEHAVE WITH LIES, IN ORDER TO STUFF YOU ABOUT AND DENY YOU ANY SORT OF CLOSURE AND 'JUSTICE' ETC.














Monday, 21 November 2016

Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 69.

 

THE IPO

You may well ask what have they got to do with the Corrupt Dorset Police. Well no doubt you have not read all of this blog for if you have you will know it started because of the corrupt way the IPO were dealing with me over the stealing off me, of my Trade Mark Viper, by my ex agent and aided by the IPO. The Dorset Police came into the equation when I went to them in Sept 2009 to ask them to investigate the perjury and forgery committed by Busbridge in any number of IPO court hearings. You will see despite my pointing out to the IPO that this was going on and they should investigate and that included me making to their CEO a Formal Complaint that they were ignoring criminal acts and refusing to investigate them, they refused to lift a finger.

So after the final debacle of a corrupt hearing held in 2010 where I was told by the IPO they would deal with these criminal acts.....they of course never even touched on them. So then I was obliged to go to my local thoroughly corrupt mob of criminals in uniform and beg them to investigate.  It was when they started treating me as if I were a criminal that I included them onto this blog.

Well this last week I have suddenly got time on my hands so I started to sort out all the bundles of files on all this very unsavoury behaviour by the IPO and the DPA. (Dorset Police Authority) Hopefully when I win the lottery I can  use them to sue the ass off all those bastards who ruined my thriving business and stole all my designs and Trade Mark. Fat chance but I can dream on. Anyhow doing this has brought back to me just how corrupt all these BASTARDS are. Reading all the evidence of that and what they did has once more enraged me and made me as mad as hell. Reminded me just how helpless British people are when trying to fight the ESTABLISHMENT !!!(When they don't have the money to do so, and they tell us we live in a democracy ???)

I read the emails and letters I did managed to drag out of the IPO through the FOIAct. In a couple of them we have two totally corrupt and criminally minded bastards from no less than the LEGAL OFFICE of the IPO, telling the useless and corrupt cop in Bournemouth Police, a Sgt Brimicombe all the lies and bad mouthing about me, that he could think of. All that of course was done to colour him against me, paint me as being this and that, so he would be put off DOING HIS JOB  and being independent and looking at the reams of documentary evidence I'd given him. So this IPO asshole by the name of Colombo tells Brimicombe that I write this blog and......STATES THAT HE FOUND THE ENTRIES EXTREMELY SHOCKING AND OFFENSIVE SO BEWARE IF YOU DO READ IT. He then gives him my URL so he can read it which I know he did.
Now, this even now when I re-read it some years on, brings it home to me just how CORRUPT THE IPO ARE !!! and just how they did every dirty trick in the book to stop me from ever getting JUSTICE AGAINST THE ROTTEN, CORRUPT AND CRIMINAL BASTARDS !!!! HOW THEY WERE UTTERLY DETERMINED TO TAKE OFF ME MY T/M AND GIVE IT TO THIS CROOK BUSBRIDGE.

You see I pull no punches in this my blog AND I CONTINUE TO DO SO. So why do I do this? Why did I call all those bastards in the IPO that and call them criminals.......because I WANTED THEM TO TAKE ME TO COURT, maybe on libel charge or dream up some criminal charge to heap upon me. That way I would have been able to get legal help, to show up in court just how corrupt and criminal they all are and were. For which I had no money (and they knew this)  to take them to court. Of course they have never done that for they know they would lose.

So here are their names once again for the World to see:- JAMES - HEAD OF LEGAL DEPARTMENT OF THE IPO. ......COLOMBO - LEGAL DPT.....HAYWARD - LEGAL DPT.


I also vainly hoped some legal entity would read all I showed in this blog and would volunteer to help out them all. Of course in this country unless your story gets big and in the news....you have no chance. The papers only want salacious stories and boring stories about some old bloke whose had his life made a misery at the end of it.....just isn't the type of news they look for. I KNOW FOR I TRIED AGES AGO AND GOT NOWHERE.