Corrupt Police & IPO- how they aided a crook. 76.

THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE.

These thoroughly despicable bastards are the ones responsible for the start of this blog back in 2008 when one of their thoroughly corrupt  law officers, one Mr James, aided by another corrupt bastard HOBBS QC, from the Treasury Solicitors. They ran a corrupt bogus appeal hearing which was nothing more than a cosy meeting between them and my arch enemy, my criminal ex agent for my cars.

They spent, it must have been at least 2 hours, not carrying out a bona-fide appeal hearing he'd asked for, but in any case, had no legal rights to have one, but giving him many tips and advice as what to do to circumvent the last hearing he'd lost to me. When I managed to wheedle out of the IPO the transcript, I could see all the corruption that had gone on at that meeting. So I started this blog to get it out into the open and expose all the bastards, including the police who refused and in connivance with the IP, to investigate all the criminal acts, despite a shed load of documentary evidence that I gave them.

Well in the last year having got myself into a position where I had not much else to do, I started thinking back to this infamous meeting dressed up as an appeal hearing. Plus how I simply could not find a  way to get justice. For quite some time ago I decided that trying to run a campaign which would deal with ALL the corruption seen in 7 hearings, was going to be too big a task. When I only needed to concentrate on the one which tipped the balance against me. That was this bogus appeal hearing held in 2005 and before a person designated as an Appointed Person....sounds grand doesn't it but is far from actually being grand. For this bastard HOBBS QC, aided and abetted by the IPO's head of their law section, a snide by the name of James. They got their dirty and corrupt heads together and concocted a method whereby they could do me out of my 'Registered' trademark; 'Viper'.

Why did they want to do this WHEN THE IPO IS SUPPOSED TO BE SQUEAKY CLEAN AND
INDEPENDENT? It was a question that beat upon my brains for many a year after that fateful event in 2005. I'd worked out that for some reason the IPO did not want me to have that Mark, but why? So recently I have been going through all the papers with a view to now get retribution and do that by getting those two criminal civil servants into a court. Not an easy task when the Establishment is doing everything it can to stop me as they always do. All shown in past posts where I have reported all my efforts to the newspapers, TV investigative programmes, the Justice Minister, law firms and Uncle tom Cobbly an all. All with no success so far, but I'm still not defeated completely.

Now after spending a lot of time reading all the evidence documents and the transcripts of the 6 hearings plus that bogus meeting/appeal and right up to the last hearing in 2010, in which the IPO completed its campaign to strip me of my legally owned Trade Mark. I have now at last seen what the bastards were upto and their reason. The reason was there staring me in the face-in the transcript of that last corrupt hearing in 2010. This hearing was heard by a Mr Salthouse, an obvious bully of a man, hand picked to do the ultimate dirty deed they'd wanted since 1998 to do against me. Who walked all over my expensive lawyer, a wimp who did not see it or stand up to him.

Mr Salthouse said right at the beginning that the IPO were fed up with this long running case and wanted an end to it and he hoped  that this would be the last hearing. Of course he knew that after the IPO had done their dirty work and stripped me of my trade mark, the only way I'd ever get real justice was to take it to the High Court and they knew I did not have the money to do that. So way into his all his words, he said to my lawyer this pearl of a statement:-

" I am afraid that in the past certain actions of the Registry (IPO) have been proved to be wrong. I would not like to hold too much stock by the fact that we made that decision and therefore that is cast in stone. I regret that we have been overturned too many times to make that the case"

To put that into context, my lawyer had just pointed out to him that I had obtained my registration
based my honest use of the mark (since end 1985) and by the way, well before Chrysler had started to use the same mark on their sportscar; IE that at my opposition to Chryslers application to register my mark, held in 1998 it was honest and the IPO had decided that. I point you to two words he said; 'that decision' so what decision is he talking about? My lawyer was talking about only 'one decison' and that was the decision to grant me the registration of the mark after that 1998 Chrysler hearing. So now you see that this corrupt IPO man was saying that that was a mistake, which 'was not cast in stone' In other words it could be 'overturned' and that is EXACTLY what these bastards then went and did, through this man carrying out their corrupt actions in his decision document. In which it has to be said, was full of waffle and obviously did not OPENLY SAY THAT THEY WERE TAKING IT OFF ME BECAUSE THEY'D MADE THIS MISTAKE BACK IN 1998. OF COURSE THERE WAS NO WAY THEY COULD OPENLY ADMIT THEY'D MADE A MISTAKE AND THIS WAS HOW THEY WERE RECTIFYING IT

What one has to also understand, is this; if the IPO really had made a mistake in their decision at that 1998 hearing, then why did Chrysler not IMMEDIATELY get it into the High Court to rectify it? THEY HAD ALL THE MONEY IN THE WORLD TO DO THAT AND THEY WERE USING A TOP LONDON IP LAW FIRM TO REPRESENT THEM. Yet they never did this and just sat on it for 4 years and did nothing and then gave up when I pushed them. So that makes you wonder why did the IPO think their decision was 'MISTAKE', because Chrysler obviously did not see or think that and make an appeal about it?? So there are still questions to be asked here as to why the IPO still decided to wrest my mark off me, right after they gave me registration? That started with their corrupt 2004 hearing and up to their corrupt and bogus alleged appeal hearing before HOBBS QC and rumbled right up through 2 more corrupt hearings,  to the last corrupt hearing in 2010 before this Salthouse-an IPO goon.  It is obvious to me that this reason Salthouse went on about, is a RECENT IDEA they have thought up to present for this latest case and I could do nothing about it due to the fact I would have to take it all through the HIGH COURT>so impossble and they knew it!!

One would be forgiven for asking why I did not click onto that statement made by Salthouse. At the hearing so many words are uttered you cannot take it all in and when I was reading the decision document I could see early on in it that it was going against me. So I just skipped over the words knowing anyway that all was lost and so the document was just filed away. It was some time before I got a copy of the transcript and even then I never read it thoroughly as the hearing was well and truly over and the dirty deeds had been done. I could not as my lawyer begged me to, take it to the High Court, as I had no money to do so. So it's been registered to the criminal Busbridge and it damns the actions of the IPO ONCE AGAIN AND TO DATE THEY HAVE GOT OFF WITH IT. They should know that its not all over yet as there are still a number of avenues I can go down....which I damn well will do so.
 

Corrupt Police & IPO-how they aided a crook. 73.

IPO = Intellectual Property Office.

This is the thoroughly corrupt mob of unmitigated bastards, who prompted me to start this blog way back in 2008. In 2010 after they helped a criminal steal my Intellectual Property off me, in the form of my Trade Mark applied to a sportscar I manufactured and thus ended that business. I went to the equally corrupt Dorset Police to try to get them to investigate the massive amount of perjury that the IPO refused to deal with. All perpetrated by the crook called BUSBRIDGE.

I knew that the DORSET POLICE had spoken at length to the IPO and also sent and received emails about me. I saw one of them, when the thick cop mistakenly sent me a copy. So under the Freedom of Information Act, I requested all copies of all letter and emails that went betwen the two of them. Plus details of phone calls. As is usual with ALL our corrupt institutions they only sent me a couple; one of which was the one already sent me by mistake by plod.

Now today I was looking through my records and came across those they disclosed and you should  think on them, for they show the mindset of not only the IPO, but of course our wonderful Dorset Police. It also show just what I was up against during ALL my dealings, not only with the IPO but then the Dorset Police. I shows just how corrupt all these bastards are and how it is impossible to get justice against them.

First I got a copy of what they call a 'File Note' and this raises the question of:- My dealings with the IPO started in 2002 after Chrysler threw the towel in, after I'd won against their trying to steal my Trade Mark 'Viper'. That meant the IPO now had to give me registration of that. Before that, ALL contact with the IPO was through firstly my Patent Agent and then a lawyer AND NOT ME!!. So direct contact started in 2002 when the IPO, minutes after giving me registration told me they were allowing Busbridge my crook ex agent, who tried to sell MY TRADE MARK to Chrysler for £1/2M saying he owned it !!!! and now the bastard was trying it on through the IPO. Obviously I was very annoyed with the IPO for they knew full well who he was and that he had no legal ownership of that T/M, as he'd been a witness for Chrysler and his involvement with me and the T/M was given in my evidence. Yet here they were allowing him to oppose my recent registration!! WHAT WAS GOING ON ??

After I got his statement of facts, as to why he thought he and not me had ownership of this T/M. I was predictably 'MAD AS HELL' as it was full of lies and forged documents that they had allowed into evidence knowing, given the past history and evidence at the Chrysler hearing, full well it was all lies and not backed up with REAL LEGAL evidence. So on that score I rang the IPO to complain and this is what some jumped up clerk noted about my call:-

Headed "Copy of a filenote Jan 04"........"There is a great deal of history between X (Busbridge my ex agent and a crook).....MR COOK CAN BE VERY DIFFICULT" !!!!! Just get that will you!!!!.If you stand up for your rights against ANY government department civil service shite, you are immediately classed as 'DIFFICULT'. No you should shut-up and say nothing.
For a start how did the IPO know anything about any dealings I'd had between myself and Busbridge before that note was written??????? I had had no direct dealings with Busbridge from 1992 to 2004 over this case as all dealings were through my Patent Agent or a lawyer and they were not endless, so why say 'a great deal'? One wonders if they had dealings with Busbridge behind my back and had listened to all he had to say about me and no doubt slagging me off, or of course, did Chrysler have things to tell them and to try and influence them against me? I would not put that past them.
As the only dealings to then, that the IPO had with me, is when in 2002 I dealt with their CEO a woman called Brimilowe, when I made a formal complaint that they were allowing Busbridge to oppose me, given what I've noted above. All within my rights to do so. Yet here we see that already the IPO was viewing me in a very negative and personal way. They are supposed to be scrupulously independent

I was also given another ' file note' this time dated July 2010 and that was after the IPO has successfully stuck the boot well into me, by taking my Trade Mark off me and don't forget what was said when they did that. For the hearing officer at that time said this :- "It will be as if Mr Cook had NEVER ever been given registration !" and that tells you EXACTLY what the IPO thought of me and how they had manipulated events from 2004 onwards, as recorded in this blog and to get to the position that they could kick me in the teeth and take what I'd previously and legally proved I owned. So you have to read these comments in the light of all that.

For now, they in an email to the Dorset Police who had contacted them (and why did they do that?) when I asked them to investigate all that perjury that the IPO had refused to ever investigate. So they go running to the IPO and they all get together to facilitate the demolition of myself. So they said:-
" Please see the attached document below as requested" (one has to ask why did the DPA ask for my blog details and who told them about it.....the IPO of course and WHY?)," a link to Mr Cook's blog. Some of the entries I found extremely shocking and offensive, so be aware if you do read it" !!!!!!!!!! Incredible!!!!!!

Now all that just shows you how the corrupt DPA and the IPO worked together to demolish me and my rights.....how corrupt is that?? First of all just how did the IPO even know I wrote a blog which up to then was entirely on how they had behaved corruptly and had forced me to go to the police. All is there for one to read if you wish so read all entries before July 2010 and ask yourself....'is any of this shocking and offensive'???? Obviously the IPO are sticking the boot in and intent on making me out to be a MONSTER, because I attacked them and of course in typical civil service attitudes, we have no right to defend our rights and positions!!

What are the IPO were doing here and only God knows what they discussed with the DPA in telephone calls between them? But it is very clear that as I say, they were intent to get the Police not to investigate, by slagging me off and it worked. For the Police TOLD ME THAT THEY WERE AWARE OF MY BLOG AND WHAT WAS IN IT, AS IF I'D BROKEN THE LAW. THAT SAID TO TELL ME THEY THOUGHT I WAS NOT WORTHY OF GETTING AN INVESTIGATION AND INDEED THEY TOLD ME THAT THE IPO HAD SAID THAT PERJURY HADN'T BEEN COMMITTED AND IN ANY CASE IT WAS A 'CIVIL MATTER'.WHICH IS A GROSS LIE!! Thus the Police after slagging me off in a very aggressive manner, refused to investigate......all documented in this blog.

But what I am trying to get over to you after having re-seen these filenotes and comments, is just how corrupt the IPO and Dorset Police of course are and that they stopped at nothing to take my legally owned trade mark off me (that I'd had to prove TO THEM, that I did legally have rights to it, that back in 1996), knowing full well I could not fight back by taking it to the High Court and get the Police to arrest Busbridge for CRIMINAL OFFENSES.

The Dorset Police and the MET Police who also spoke to the IPO over all this, with the same results for me. But worse still, is that I knew full well that there were masses of documents to do with me that they never gave up and they say that they were entitled not to give up certain documents so you wonder what was in those? Many would hold personal comments about me that if I'd seen them could have proved beyond doubt that the IPO were behaving corruptly and were determined that for some reason, they did not want me to ever own that Trade Mark. I have my thoughts as to why that is but will I ever be able WITHOUT THE HELP OF OTHERS, TO GET INTO THEIR RECORDS ON ME AND THIS CASE, AS THEY HAVE THWARTED ALL MY EFFORTS TO DO THIS LEGALLY, AND WITH IMPUNITY.  My efforts to complain about this to the ICO got nowhere as all Ombudsmen are a CON ON THE BRITISH PUBLIC....and that has been the subject of newspaper articles on this corrupt and expensive mob....the ICO.
___________________________________________________________________________________



Now being rich Chrysler used the biggest IP Law firm to represent them, that was around in London. The IP World is a small one and all the big IP lawyers know each other well, as do all those in the IPO. Do you seriously think that the big lawyers representing them, had nothing to say to the high up managers in the IPO law section??? They probably all belonged to the same posh clubs, went to the same Public schools and played golf in the same clubs. That is how the ESTABLISHMENT works all the time. I firmly believe that it was a set up from the beginning, but somehow the Hearing Officer at that hearing when I won against Chrysler, either forgot his script lines and how he was expected to find the case or was an 'honest Joe'. Think I'm dreaming.....then open up the transcript of the Hobbs QC hearing and go to the comments he made about that hearing on pages 33 line 25 and 34 line 1-7.........."I have looked at, as you know, the Registry record. You can get them off the internet with all the case details, the case history.....the long sordid history" Busbridge replies, "I have a couple of those"
Hobbs..."Only a couple, I have the history at the same time relating to Chrysler on a mark (trade) and this looks like a complete and utter mess to me"  
Now reflect on all that for what Hobbs is saying- he has looked at the 'history' and what he is in fact saying is that he has looked at all the papers and decisions made, when I opposed Chysler and won, then when Busbdridge opposed my registration which he corruptly won, but I forced the IPO to look at the legality of some his evidence and another hearing heard all that and by a Hearing Officer; Landau, which  I won. This phony appeal hearing Hobbs was supposed to be hearing, was against the Landau decision.
He is saying that it was all 'a mess and sordid' and it is clear that he thinks that my involvement was 'sordid and a mess' (or maybe he thinks the decision by the HO in 1996 -Chrysler which I won, and the Landau decision which I won was also 'sordid and a mess') It is therefore clear that something here is going on that is very corrupt and ILLEGAL!!

One has to wonder why Hobbs said all that, but I am convinced he had been got at by the IPO and it was all worked out between the IPO and this well known IP lawyer/Judge QC. This phoney appeal hearing was not 'bona-fide', as Busbridge gave no legal grounds to even get an appeal. The IPO needed to act in a way that turned round the Landau decision and how to do this? By setting up a phony appeal hearing where they could give Busbridge all the advice he needed to carry out actions that would allow the IPO to turn it all around. That would then appear to be all kosher. That is exactly what happened and if you read this blog (or the attached book 'Justice denied') in the relevant areas, you will see how Busbridge carried out all the advice that he was given and I eventually ended up in 2010, stripped of my T/M

One should also remind yourself that Hobbs was the biggest I/P Appeal Judge, hearing IPO appeals and cases, where an alleged 'independent appeal officer' would officiate. If you research his case history, he has heard more such cases and big ones than any one, which makes him a person the IPO would be intimately connected to and this phony appeal hearing shows this when you read the way he and James of the IPO talked to each other. Like a pair of close ex school buddies, they were practically having sex with each other!!!!  

Of course all my protestations at what had gone on and my official complaints, were ignored and got nowhere. As my complaints made through the Justice Ministry were swotted down by lies about how any decision made by a Judge could not be altered or complained about. That's a lie for a start as appeals against stupid Judges happen all the time, but here NO DECISION WAS EVER GIVEN AS THE PHONY APPEAL WAS 'DROPPED' BY BUSBRIDGE on Hobbs advice and all he had to do was carry out all the 'advice he'd been given by Hobbs and James helped him do all that, with all the results that can be seen in this blog....BRITISH JUSTICE AT WORK HERE!!!!The justice Ministry when that was pointed out ignored me.



 
   

Corrupt Police & IPO-how they aided a crook. 72.

On a post I made back on the 19th April I told how I had sent a letter to Liz Truss the Justice Minister, where I told her how a Judge had trashed my business and life and how I had found it absolutely impossible to get justice through any avenue, including all the complaint procedures within the justice system. How I had been stonewalled at every turn by the Establishment Johnnies who are not interested in real justice, only protecting their fellow cronies.

JUSTICE MINISTER>

Well yesterday I got a reply, but predictably not from her. So some obnoxious civil servant must have way-laid my letter so she never saw it and had not read it properly, as they never do and then thought that some other government department should be given it so as to bury it in someway. So this letter of reply was from the HM Courts & Tribunals, Customer Investigation Section. Don't they make you seeth these modern twerps that infest all of our PC Plonker government departments. They treat you as if they were a BUSINESS and you are a 'CUSTOMER' and as if you had willingly gone to them to get 'SERVICE' of some sort or to buy something.

It was the predictable short reply they always send you, full of lying excuses as to how they can 'Do nothing' then they trot out one lie after another. They have obviously not read your letter and understood what you were saying or more like it, they have deliberately 'misread' it and that has given them the right to then think up lies to excuse them doing nothing. Every avenue I'd already been down previously had used this absolute lie of an excuse:- "the judiciary are constitutionally independent of government and they must be able to make their decisions without interference"
So what this means is any judge can behave in whatever way they want INCLUDING ACTING IN AN UNLAWFUL WAY....BREAKING THE LAWS THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO UPHOLD!!! and they get off Scott free, as they are 'untouchable'. That is obvious BOLLOCKS for they can be charged when they break the law. Very few do for the same reasons I am coming up against. No politician is willing to stand up to them as is no one in the Police or even our rotten Press.

The letter went on:- "It is therefore not possible for a government Minister to comment on or intervene in matters that have been the subject of judicial consideration" Now you can see how slippery they are and how they use this excuse over and over again -TOTALLY IGNORING WHAT I TOLD THEM IN MY LETTER !! The hearing that Judge Hobbs officiated in was an appeal hearing or was supposed to be. Yet no matters to do with any appeal and what the appellant had given that gave him the right to appeal, and its legal merits etc, were ever discussed. Nor was there ANY DECISION EVERMADE!!!! As the appellant had never raised ANY LEGAL REASONS as to how he could even have an appeal which should have been in the statement he gave when asking for an appeal, which he was legally obliged to do, nothing like that was gone into. As I told them the transcript shows clearly that all that the alleged hearing covered, was this judge giving the appellant a bucket load of ADVICE ON HOW HE COULD CIRCUMVENT THE DECISION GIVEN AGAINST HIM THAT HE WAS SUPPOSED TO BE APPEALING. THIS IS ILLEGAL AND CONSTITUTED AN ACT OF PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE. 
SEE ON THE RIGHT OF THIS PAGE WHERE YOU CAN DOWNLOAD THE TRANSCRIPT AND READ IT YOURSELF.

Of course no one has the guts to want to agree on what actually did happen and to stand up against the 'Judicial Mafia'. Including NEWPAPERS!! This woman writer, a Miss Charlotte Green, whoever she is, went on to say that she had tried to trace my case or find what appeal routes I had taken. This just shows you what THICKO'S I am dealing with. For the case was never heard in front of a 'normal' Court but at a Tribunal Hearing under the auspices of the 'TREASURY SOLICITORS' and what's more, as I plainly told Lizz Truss I was not the person who applied to have an appeal hearing, as it was my enemy and ex agent who stole my Trade Mark and business and they denied me access or any say in that hearing!! So it was obvious she would never be able to trace anything through the normal courts records.

She then cheekily advises me to go to the Citizens Advice, who I approached some time ago and predictably it was so far out of their depths it was a farce, as I knew it would be. No solicitor will touch it, you cannot get Legal Aid and in any case hardly any lawyers do Legal Aid these days except for protecting illegal immigrants and terrorists who want to stay in this country, so they can blow up our kids. It all makes me sick as there are lawyers falling over themselves to do that, but protect a Brit from corrupt lawyers and Judges....NO WAY SO GO AWAY!!

Another lying excuse she kept making was "If I wanted to appeal the 'decision' as I was unhappy with the 'decision' etc" When I specifically said in my letter to Truss that NO APPEAL HEARING TOOK  PLACE AND SO NO 'DECISION' WAS EVER MADE AS THE APPELLANT DROPPED HIS APPEAL!!!!!!!! AND THAT AFTER HE'D GOT THE ADVICE TO DO, SO THEN FOLLOW THEIR INSTRUCTIONS AND THEN HIS LIFE WOULD SUDDENLY TURN INTO LIGHT AND ROSES AND HE COULD THEN GO ON AND FINISH OFF HIS ATTEMPTS TO STEAL MY TRADE MARK AND FINISH OFF MY BUSINESS!!!! HOW CORRUPT AND UNLAWFUL IS ALL THAT AND THE DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE IS ALL THERE FOR ALL TO SEE AND SHOWS THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED.

So you have to either think she was as thick as two short planks and could not grasp what I had said.....or more likely she was being her usual civil service devious lying, and twisting what I had said and that meant she could invent lying excuses to do nothing. I HAD HIGHLIGHTED IN CAPITALS THAT NO DECISION HAD EVER BEEN MADE ETC ETC.  Of course this election has stuffed up me being able to go back to the Justice Minister right now and will it even be Miss Truss??  So more time wasted. But as you can see I am a VERY perservering person who will keep going on.

HERE ARE COPIES  OF THOSE THREE LETTERS BETWEEN ME AND LIZ TRUSS MP, THE REPLY FROM MISS GREEN AND MY REPLY TO HER GIVING HER 'WHAT (Is this rubbish you sent me?  )

READING THEM YOU WILL SEE AND GRASP ALL THAT THIS IS ABOUT......HOW THE POLITICIANS, THEIR DEVIOUS PROTECTING CIVIL SERVANTS AND A*******s IN THE SO CALLED JUSTICE SYSTEM, BEHAVE WITH LIES, IN ORDER TO STUFF YOU ABOUT AND DENY YOU ANY SORT OF CLOSURE AND 'JUSTICE' ETC.

Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 69.

 

THE IPO

You may well ask what have they got to do with the Corrupt Dorset Police. Well no doubt you have not read all of this blog for if you have you will know it started because of the corrupt way the IPO were dealing with me over the stealing off me, of my Trade Mark Viper, by my ex agent and aided by the IPO. The Dorset Police came into the equation when I went to them in Sept 2009 to ask them to investigate the perjury and forgery committed by Busbridge in any number of IPO court hearings. You will see despite my pointing out to the IPO that this was going on and they should investigate and that included me making to their CEO a Formal Complaint that they were ignoring criminal acts and refusing to investigate them, they refused to lift a finger.

So after the final debacle of a corrupt hearing held in 2010 where I was told by the IPO they would deal with these criminal acts.....they of course never even touched on them. So then I was obliged to go to my local thoroughly corrupt mob of criminals in uniform and beg them to investigate.  It was when they started treating me as if I were a criminal that I included them onto this blog.

Well this last week I have suddenly got time on my hands so I started to sort out all the bundles of files on all this very unsavoury behaviour by the IPO and the DPA. (Dorset Police Authority) Hopefully when I win the lottery I can  use them to sue the ass off all those bastards who ruined my thriving business and stole all my designs and Trade Mark. Fat chance but I can dream on. Anyhow doing this has brought back to me just how corrupt all these BASTARDS are. Reading all the evidence of that and what they did has once more enraged me and made me as mad as hell. Reminded me just how helpless British people are when trying to fight the ESTABLISHMENT !!!(When they don't have the money to do so, and they tell us we live in a democracy ???)

I read the emails and letters I did managed to drag out of the IPO through the FOIAct. In a couple of them we have two totally corrupt and criminally minded bastards from no less than the LEGAL OFFICE of the IPO, telling the useless and corrupt cop in Bournemouth Police, a Sgt Brimicombe all the lies and bad mouthing about me, that he could think of. All that of course was done to colour him against me, paint me as being this and that, so he would be put off DOING HIS JOB  and being independent and looking at the reams of documentary evidence I'd given him. So this IPO asshole by the name of Colombo tells Brimicombe that I write this blog and......STATES THAT HE FOUND THE ENTRIES EXTREMELY SHOCKING AND OFFENSIVE SO BEWARE IF YOU DO READ IT. He then gives him my URL so he can read it which I know he did.
Now, this even now when I re-read it some years on, brings it home to me just how CORRUPT THE IPO ARE !!! and just how they did every dirty trick in the book to stop me from ever getting JUSTICE AGAINST THE ROTTEN, CORRUPT AND CRIMINAL BASTARDS !!!! HOW THEY WERE UTTERLY DETERMINED TO TAKE OFF ME MY T/M AND GIVE IT TO THIS CROOK BUSBRIDGE.

You see I pull no punches in this my blog AND I CONTINUE TO DO SO. So why do I do this? Why did I call all those bastards in the IPO that and call them criminals.......because I WANTED THEM TO TAKE ME TO COURT, maybe on libel charge or dream up some criminal charge to heap upon me. That way I would have been able to get legal help, to show up in court just how corrupt and criminal they all are and were. For which I had no money (and they knew this)  to take them to court. Of course they have never done that for they know they would lose.

So here are their names once again for the World to see:- JAMES - HEAD OF LEGAL DEPARTMENT OF THE IPO. ......COLOMBO - LEGAL DPT.....HAYWARD - LEGAL DPT.


I also vainly hoped some legal entity would read all I showed in this blog and would volunteer to help out them all. Of course in this country unless your story gets big and in the news....you have no chance. The papers only want salacious stories and boring stories about some old bloke whose had his life made a misery at the end of it.....just isn't the type of news they look for. I KNOW FOR I TRIED AGES AGO AND GOT NOWHERE.

Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 68.

POSSIBILITES RE CHYSLER & THE IPO>

Those of you who have been following this enquiry may like me have been appalled by the antics of the various ex Met chiefs who have been interviewed. What a bunch of twisting liars they presented as. Of course two of them who were supposed to be running the Met, when I was trying to get those useless bastards to investigate Busbridge. Stevens was one and he as with the rest, lied his head of about what he knew about the phone hacking.
One of them had to resign because of his involvement in dubious goings on. Now what really hacks me off is the deafening silence we always get when the media expose our useless and corrupt cops. During all these sickening relevations of the past weeks at this enquiry, not one politician has voiced his concern that we obviously have a throughly discredited and corrupt police force in the Met and this force is supposed to be the premier force of the UK. Of course all the different forces are the same but the Met should be a shining example, which it simply isn't and never has been. Except it is a shining example of just how corrupt coppers can be.
No, our pollies don't seem to be in the slightest bit bothered, when what they should be doing is going all out to expose them for what they are and cleaning the filth up. So the bastards just keep getting away with it....the incompetence and the corruption just carries on.
I rarely meet anyone who has any time for the BASTARDS these days and I am talking here about people I know or meet, who like me cannot stand our police and have no time for them at all, not those who are criminals or yobs, as I do not mix with the trash of Brit life in any way. These are all people like myself, professionals or business people and the like. How have we got to the stage in Brit life when so few people have the slightest faith in the very people who are supposed to be there to protect us from the scum of the Earth???

Going back to what I have said in the past few posts as to why did the IPO behaved in the way it did over this whole case. Many may think that my thoughts on what was the reasons the IPO did what they did and the possible actions Chysler may have carried out, are too far fetched. Well think about this; in addition to what I've already put forward, Chrysler when they started to export their Vipers to Europe, spent a lot of money in promoting their car. They set up a special racing series for that car and as I've said no Yanky international company will spend what they did only to have some upstart like me get in their way of being able to call their car in the UK, by the name of Viper.
That is eactly what I did, first by stopping them from being able to register that name in the UK after I won that hearing with the IPO in 1996. What Chyrysler did after that was to deliberately try and ruin me with legal costs by saying they were going to appeal it and then dragging their feet for FOUR YEARS until I went to a legal team and FORCED them to give up. They KNEW they had no case, so why did they behave like this......BECAUSE LIKE SO MANY YANK COMPANIES.... THEY HAD NO MORALS.
Even after they had to drop their saying they wanted to appeal, they carried on calling their car, in the UK, by MY REGISTERED NAME OF VIPER. So I had to take legal action which stopped them and they had to pay my costs.
Now what I am trying to point out to you, is that any company that behaves in the corrupt and immoral way, like they did for over ten years and over them wanting to own that name, IS PERFECTLY CAPABLE OF PAYING SOMEONE IN THE IPO FROM THE BEGINNING BACK IN 1992, TO SWING THINGS FOR THEM. And of course anyone in the IPO who was part of that corrupt action, would do anything to hide that fact and that would include doing to me what they did and making sure that Busbridge got the T/M, as they knew he was in with Chrysler. They knew that once he got the rego of the T/M, he would sell it to Chrsyler and then Chrysler will have got what they wanted. Of course what they never realised at the beginning is that I would put up such a fight which made all the procedures last for going on 20 years.
There will be those of you who will know that long before that period of time was reached, Chryslers fortunes took a big turn for the worse and they very nearly went out of business. Also in the meantime their Viper simply never took off in the UK or Europe as it was a typical peice of Yank rubbish as far as sportscars went and not really the type of sportscar Europeans go for.. They never sold very many at all.
However whoever in the IPO got themselves in the pay and involved with Chrysler had by doing that, carried out corruption and illegal activities which they would have to cover up. It is not such a tall story at all as these things happen all the time in the civil service for if you like me, follow what goes on in British life will know. Civil servants get themselves into corruption all the time and let us not forget......... THAT THE POLICE ARE ALL CIVIL SERVANTS THEMSELVES AND LOOK AT WHAT CORRUPTION THEY HAVE BEEN INVOLVE IN, OVER ALL OF MY LIFETIME AND SOME OF WHICH IS NOW COMING OUT INTO THE OPEN!!!!
STILL THINK CIVIL SERVANTS ARE AS CLEAN AS A WHISTLE? 

Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 67.

CORRUPT GOVERNMENT>FACTS THAT PROVE THIS>

Now that the Leveson enquiry has reached the point where a top woman Police Officer has just reported facts that I have been saying in this blog for three years now; that all government departments are steeped in corruption because too many of its officials have been up to their necks in corrupt practices. Mainly by taking back handers from the media and others.
Well tell us something new is what I say. Of course in my case they have been corrupt in that way, I am sure, and in other ways which I have highlighted in this blog and my book, over and over again. Now this is all out in the open I feel that I must now put forward my own ideas that I have had for a long time, as to just how the IPO have been corrupt over the 20 year history with them.
So here is what I feel is a real and feasible explanation as to why they acted against me and went to the ends of the earth to see me stripped of my IP in the Trade Mark Viper, I so obviously and legally owned. One has to go back to the beginning of my blog and see how things started off. The reason Busbridge tried to prove he owned my Mark Viper, was simply because he found out that Chrysler wanted to register that mark for itself, starting with their application to register it in Jan 1990. They did not realise that I had been using it since Jan 1986 and therefore had prior usage and the first claim to it, but I had not registered or applied to register it. However this did not negate my rights to it and Chrysler simply did not do their homework and search everywhere as to if someone else was using it. Or they thought they were so powerful they could brush aside people like me.
I feel that when Busbridge contacted them, ( and don't forget I took him on as an agent in eraly 1988 so any connection (as my agent) goes to that date) it is entirely possible that they then did do some exploring of the UK car trade and if so, they would have seen straight away that I had a powerful claim to it and that Busbridge DID NOT. For instance I did the 1987 London Car Show at Earls Court which is where I got the multi million pound order from Japan. So any decent person would say that I was perfectly legally the user of that Mark. He was unable to produce ANY evidence that he had used it IN ANY WAY prior to Feb/March 1988 when I licensed him to use my mark as my London agent.
I believe that they then decided that the easiest way to get rid of me was to use Busbridge to smear my name with accusations that I had committed forgery when I produced a copy of the license I gave Busbridge in 1989 a proof that any claims he was making that he owned the mark were a lie and completely false. He of course colluded with them over this.
One also has to take into consideration that Chrysler are obviously an American company and so many such companies are thoroughly corrupt and will do anything to get their own way. Understand this if you will; they had made their Viper sports car in the States and then they decided to sell it in Europe. No American company would do that if they did not expect to be able to sell many Vipers. They would not have taken such steps to just sell a few and to be able sell they would need to register the Mark Viper in ALL the European countries. In all the countries in Europe they would meet no resistance to doing this as no one else was using the mark there. In the UK they met resistance from Busbridge in the first instance and then me when I found out what he and they were up to and this in 1992.
I believe that they thought that if they first of all got rid of me with the help of Busbridge, (as I obviously had the stronger claim to the Mark) then they would have no trouble to get rid of him as he was standing on quicksands as he could show no evidence that would be accepted as real proof as to his bona-fide ownership. To do this they had to get my opposition to them registering the Mark, heard first.
The trouble for them was, that I believe that the IPO should have actually given Busbridge first shot at opposing their application, as he applied shortly before me to oppose them.  (And that fact should in no way make it that he had the stronger claim as the IPO later on claimed for any claim to a T/M should rest solely on who used it first and not who applied to register it first) Now the thing was they did not do that but gave ME first shot and the hearing in 1995 was held with them using Busbridge as their supposed witness against me and using these false allegations of forgery. Why did this happen in this order, one has to ask?
So the most way they did this was through the London based Intellectual lawyers that Chryslers were using at that time. Throughout all the time I have been involved in this thoroughly corrupt tale I have seen that many intellectual property law companies are up to their necks in it with the IPO. I do not believe that when you have a situation were lawyers are in constant contact with such a governmental organisation as the IPO, that they are not going to make cosy alliances and arrangements with the IPO. This so that cases can be conducted in an easy alliance in such a way as can only be done in such a place like England. Let us not forget that we are dealing here with the UK Establishment, with its Public schoolboy set and their "you scratch my back and I will scratch yours" and all that kind of stuff. IP lawyers will want an easy life and so will the civil servant lot in the IPO, who in the top ranks will have similar backgrounds to their lawyer buddies in the law firms.
So I believe that Chrysler will have told their lawyers to fix it so that someone high up in the IPO makes sure that the rules are bent in Chryslers favour. WHAT OTHER EXPLANATION IS THERE FOR THE IPO TO HAVE PUT ME IN FIRST TO OPPOSE CHRYSLER WHEN BUSBRIDGE SHOULD HAVE BEEN OPPOSING THEM FIRST????
However to get the IPO to direct me to have my opposition application heard first is against their own rules as the first application should be heard first, but had that happened it would have almost certainly failed for Busbridge for as I have said-he had no case. He would have then been cast out of the way for good and then Chrsylers would still have had to deal with my bona-fide application with its strong irrefutable evidence of first usage of the mark.
If you read all the evidence of what has gone on since that first fateful opposition hearing you will see time and again that the IPO and its corrupt officials have taken steps to thwart me. Breaking the rules again and again. The only possible explanation for the perplexing questions of; "why did the IPO make all these corrupt actions just to make sure I had my registration taken away from me after I had gained registration"
You may say "well you did gain registration and so how did that happen of the IPO was so corrupt and in the pay of Chrsyler?" Well you see that hearing which Chrysler thought they had in the bag, actually went against them. I believe that the hearing officer who heard that case in 1995 was not obeying orders to find against me and that put the cat amongst the pigeons. ( you might say he was an incorruptible civil servant) Why do I think this is what happened? Well you have to look at a few remarks that have slipped out along the way and have been made by IPO officials. Like the remark that was made by Judge Hobbs to Busbridge in his later hearing where he colluded with the IPO head manager, a Mr James, to swing that hearing totally in Busbridges favour, give him all the corrupt help and ideas as to how he should proceed so that the IPO could then swing things around and back to his favour and enable him to proceed and complete his stealing of my trade mark. He (Hobbs)alluded the the travesty of that hearing of mine against Chrysler, in 1995 and what he really meant was that it had not gone the way that Chrysler and the IPO had wanted it to. The hearing Hobbs heard, you will see if you have read all this blog or my book was heard because another straight hearing officer actually, at yet another hearing found for me a pointed out that Busbridge had no rights to the mark and for several reasons. So Busbridge had to appeal this or get knocked out completely AND the IPO just had to find reasons and ways in which to correct matters for them and Chrysler. They set this hearing up with a thoroughly in their pocket Judge, to advise Busbridge how he could take steps to circumvent the previous judgement that he lost and thus get back on track and that way the IPO could swing things their way and for him and Chrysler. Thus getting rid of me at last.
Because of the cock-up of me winning the 1995 opposition hearing against Chrysler, the IPO had to go through the motions of giving me registration and then find reasons to take it back off me. (you will have to read all the history to see how all that was done and why.) I believe that someone high up was paid a back hander and it could have been more than one person that was paid off by Chrsyler, no doubt through their lawyer, and this too meant that all those implicated would be scared shitless that they would be found out. That would mean that it was imperative that they destroyed me and my business, so as to get rid of me. You can see that this was on their minds by the remarks the hearing officer made in that last hearing in 2010 when they completed their dirty deeds and against all the overwhelming evidence against them and Busbridge....and stripped me of my legally registered trade mark.
You can also see how the IPO have worked to stop me getting Justice when they colluded with the thoroughly corrupt Met Police to block my attempts to get the Met to investigate the forgery and perjury of Busbridge at ALL the 8 hearings that took place and the Trial I had to undergo in 2000.
You may say that I am dreaming and making all this up and these kind of things just do not go on. If you think that, then it is you who is the dreamer who simply is not living on this planet. For now it is all out and quite clear just what goes on with all the rotten corrupt civil servants, the Police and especially the Met Police, who have been taking bribes for years off the media and others. If they are capable of doing that, then a simple case of taking back handers off another corrupt American global company who will do anything for the bottom Dollar, is complete chicken feed and VERY probable. For the facts of this case contains so many FACTS that are inexplicable and can only be explained by something having gone on in such a way as I have outlined above and in my book "Justice Denied" and other places in this blog.

Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 66.

The Intellectual Property Office which is yet another governmental body of asshole civil servants who are never wrong and who have things so well wrapped up that no one member of the British Public (apart from rich ones)can ever get Justice against, when these bastards decide they are going to do you over.
This is what this whole blog is about (in case you haven't been reading it from the start in 2008). They of course decided for reasons best known to them that they would allow a conman to steal all my IP, thus ruining my whole life. (as outlined in this blog).
Now, on idly searching the web under "Complaints against the IPO" I could see website after website set up by these assholes. ( I make no apology for calling them assholes, either) Amongst the many websites they show are some that highlight that if one is not happy with the IPO, there are procedures by which one can make complaints about them. Seeing that you would think that this is all very fair and you will be safe.
Let me tell you the truth. I have used these so called safe guards many times and they are a con on the Public. They are a set up and designed to go through all the motions that a complaints procedure is being carried out, but the outcome is predetermined against you ever winning. No Sir!! I have even complained to their CEO's (three different ones at different times as they seem to change them frequently) Even though I laid out in very clear terms with evidence, that I had been dumped on and that the IPO's own laws had been disregarded and broken, most of what I said was ignored and the rest twisted so as to appear that nothing wrong had ever happened. So you get nowhere. AND there is really no way you can appeal to anyone 100% INDEPENDENT!!
You can ultimately complain to the Parliamentary Ombudsman, but what in REALITY is he?? Well they would have you believe that they ARE independent, but they are LIARS. For all these people are, are yet ANOTHER BUNCH OF LYING, CORRUPT AND TWISTED CIVIL SERVANTS only there to protect their fellow civil servants. For they do exactly the same as anyone in the IPO does and that is ignore your evidence of wrongdoing, make loads of excuses on behalf of their brothers in arms and all this takes 6-9 months before you get your inevitable whitewash letter rejecting all your complaints and evidence. WELCOME TO JUSTICE 'BRITISH STYLE' RUN BY THE VERY PEOPLE YOU PAY TO KEEP IN EXISTENCE, IN THEIR CUSHY JOBS WITH EARLY RETIREMENT ON HUGE PENSIONS....THEY ARE ALL ASSHOLES AND SHOULD BE AS JEREMY CLARKSON SAID....SHOT IN FRONT OF THEIR FAMILIES. (For Treason and crimes against the British Public)

Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 65.

THE ICO

A few posts back I told you about how the Information Commissioners Office had dealt with my complaints about the IPO, the Met and the Dorset Police had refused to release to me documents that had been created after I had asked the Police to investigate Busbridge for forgery and perjury.
Of course the ICO are EXACTLY the same as all other quangoes and departments set up by government to give the illusion that if you are steam rollered over by a government body, you can at least go to some commissioner or other body to get redress. ITS ALL A SHAM AND NON OF THESE BODIES DO ANYTHING OTHER THAN PROTECT THE VERY BODIES YOU COMPLAIN ABOUT.......this is laughingly known as DEMOCRACY!!! If you believe in these bodies then your stupid and should be put away for your safety.
I know that the IPO sent DC Brimicombe of Dorset Police an email in which they supposedly gave him advice on whether perjury and forgery had been committed in their hearings. I know that because this oaf of a slimeball copper, told me he'd received this advice. Now how did he receive it?.......obviously through the email that the IPO said they were going to send him with this advice on it!!! Isn't that crystal clear? Yet it isn't apparently to the ICO. The IPO gave me copies of various emails etc but not this crucial email which they refuse to even comment on. The Dorset Police told the ICO that it had been destroyed so that proves its existence.
Yet in their latest letter to me today the ICO say "there is no strong evidence that it holds the disputed email now, if indeed it were ever held"
Now that statement just shows you how cynical these bastards are. First of all the IPO gave me copies of a few emails etc dating back years, yet miraculously now the ICO are hinting that this ONE EMAIL may not be around anymore! If it isn't then it has been cynically destroyed by the IPO so they cannot release it and this being the same as the DPS say they did to it. (If either ever did do this)
Then the cynical ICO hint that it just may be a figment of my imagination, and one has to ask, where did they get that idea from???? Yet why would the IPO tell Brimicombe they would send him this email with all the info in it that he'd asked for, and then not send it and why did this man then tell me he'd got all this info off the IPO and because of what he was told he would not investigate Busbridge. No doubt he was also told by the IPO I was a trouble maker, a nuisance, a nutter etc etc ad nauseam!! Hence why both the IPO & the DPS refused to let me see this email and now we have the ICO even saying they doubt it ever existed.... the bastards. So how can anyone have any faith that they are neutral and not as corrupt as all the other bastards in this story????
Then of course let us not forget that there was also another document, either a letter or an email that the IPO would have sent the Met in which they gave the same advice on me and all those hearings and whether perjury and forgery were committed.
The ICO ignored that complaint by me when I complained about the Met, just like they have done with the IPO & the DPS......what a corrupt shower.
These latest documents from the ICO to me and mine to them will show you all and will be put on this blog along with all the other documents.
This latest letter from the ICO was in reply to my complaint to them about their decision document of the 12th July, in which they exonerated the IPO and the DPS of all that I had complained about. I complained that many things I had said had been ignored and that I wanted them to answer my questions about that. Of course what happens when you ask specific questions to civil servants THEY ALWAYS IGNORE THEM AS IF YOU'D NEVER EVEN ASKED THEM. You will see this on those documents as I have notated on the copy of my letter where these questions have been ignored. You will also see that both the Freedom of Information Act and the Data Protection Acts are a completed farce and another con on the Public of Britain. You can ask for documents but if they will incriminate any civil servants you will not get them and you will be fed a whole bunch of excuses and be given so called parts of these acts, that allegedly give them the right to withhold what you seek. SO WHAT IS THE POINT OF THESE ACTS, I ASK????? Also you would have to be a good lawyer to know if what they tell you about these alleged parts of the Acts, are actually the truth or just made up. So they know that you as a non lawyer, will never know if you are being conned.

Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 64.

THE MET POLICE AGAIN.

If you have been reading all the publicity over the weekend about the Met you will know that the head of this useless and corrupt shower, Paul Stephenson has resigned. So he should and this is the ***t that ignored my letter to him about the corrupt goings on between his men at Camden and the IPO. The conniving and colluding in order to stop me from getting justice over Busbridges criminal activities.
You will remember also that both corrupt bodies refused to release to me the incriminating documents that would have proved that they were corrupt and indulging in ILLEGAL ACTIVITES by colluding together to deny me justice.
So I am heartedly glad he's gone the bastard. I hope he and that other twerp Yates, rot in hell, but then both will still get their gold plated HUGE pensions etc and will now be able to live the life of Riley, so they will not mind one bit, I am sure!
THE DICTIONARY STATES:- CORRUPT...lacking in integrity, open to or involving in bribery or other dishonest practices, putrid or rotten....CORRUPTION, the act of corrupting or state of being corrupt...dishonesty. So those of you who probably think I use this word with gay abandon, think again! I think that my constant use of this word is entirely justified, as I use it in the context of describing the goings on of ALL the government departments that I have been forced to have to go to and then have to put up with their rotten acts of corrupt practices.
Certainly the Met are the most corrupt police force in the UK and always have been. However other forces are also corrupt too, like my local force the Dorset Shower. Not many people in Dorset have much good to say about them, either and you should read my link to the website called Dorset police.Then you will see some of the goings on they get up to. Same as the Met but on a smaller scale.

Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 63.

THE CORRUPT LIARS OF THE MET AND THE USELESS CIVIL SERVANTS OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONERS OFFICE, WHO LIKE THE IPCC SEEM ONLY TO BE IN EXISTENCE TO PROTECT THE POLICE AND THE IPO. SO THEY TOO ARE CORRUPT BECAUSE IT IS OBVIOUS THAT THEY ARE DOING THIS KNOWINGLY AND DELIBERATELY. THUS PROTECTING THE POLICE AND DENYING ME JUSTICE

How many of you have watched those wretched Met Coppers on TV blagging and lying their way through the MP's questioning them. What an utter shower they all are.

Now folks this is coming from the very same mob of bastards that HAMPERED MY TRYING TO GET JUSTICE AND MY ASKING THEM TO INVESTIGATE BUSBRIDGES FORGERY AND PERJURY!! Talk about HYPOCRITES and what did they do, but hamper my efforts and in collusion with the IPO. Is it any wonder I couldn't get them to act on irrefutable evidence when they just went and colluded with another bunch of civil servants?

THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONERS OFFICE.
A few posts back I told you about how the ICO to whom I had complained about the Met and the Dorset Police, the IPO and the Parliamentary Ombudsman, all hiding from me documents that they all sent each other when I had tried to get the Met to investigate Busbridge. It really only involved TWO documents that I definitely knew existed. One the email the IPO sent Sgt Brimicombe of Dorset Police and two, the advice the IPO gave Sgt Downs at Camden Station to HELP him refuse to investigate. He admits in an email which is on this blog, that they gave him this advice.
In both cases I believe that the IPO will have disseminated to both the DPS & the Met, lies about whether forgery and perjury had been committed. I am also sure that they will have thrown in a load of derogatory remarks about me on a personal level.
This ICO mob gave me their decision re the Dorset Police a few weeks ago and how they were a bunch of whiter than white darlings who had done absolutely no wrong. I wrote about that a few posts back. Today I got their decisions about my complaints that all had refused me under the FOIAct and the DPAct and I talk now about the IPO & the Met.
The ICO have deliberately misread my complaints about both parties and in both cases they have twisted the requests I gave them in such a way as to be able to say that what I had asked for, was not able to be given to me. Yet what they say I had asked for is not what I had asked for, as I in the course of writing to both the Met & the IPO had honed my request down to those two specific documents. Originally I had asked for any documents they had that concerned me and in the case of the IPO what they had said to the Met and in the Mets case what they had said to the IPO or had received off the IPO and I specifically mentioned this one document. (the advice that the IPO gave Sgt Downs.)
In the case of the IPO I was specific about the email that they admitted they would send to the DPS. Yet what they, the ICO have done is spoken to the IPO and obviously have been fed lies by them which is what they do all the time. They try to say I did not apply under the right Act when the fcat is that I applied for the same under BOTH Acts and they say that information I had asked for could be openly seen under the Trade Marks journals which are open to the Public. This is a complete lie as what I asked for had nothing to do with any of the 8 hearings, so would never be found on any files open to the public. This is how these bastards work, by lying all the time and giving the ICO excuses so they can find for their mates in another government department. They are all shagging each other these civil servant bastards and covering up for each other.
In the case of the Met I even had to pay £10 in order to get any info off them under the DPAct. Yet when do the ICO even mention this so it's as if I am being told I did not apply under the right Act.
In both requests to the IPO & the Met I had simply asked to see both these documents which would have had in them matters to do with my request to get the Met to investigate all the forgery and perjury Busbridge had committed. All my letters about this are on this blog, so you can see for yourself what I asked for. Then the ICO deliberately complicate matters by constantly switching their remarks from one Act to the other and back again. The fact that there are TWO Acts that basically deal with matters that I think are the same. Some idiot in Parliament who thought up these Acts (in order to fool the Public that you could actually make civil servants give up incriminating documents) has I think deliberately made matters in such a way that the powers can obfuscate in all sorts of ways and tie you up in knots over what Act are you asking under? That is why I asked the same questions under BOTH Acts and they still lie through their back teeth and refuse you those documents. The whole thing is yet another sham and con on the Public.
In my case they have deliberately refused to give me those documents and the ICO have backed them up and as it is obvious the ICO have talked to the IPO it is also obvious that the IPO have given them a pack of lies. You can see how the ICO have been indoctrinated by the IPO as on the beginning of their decision document on the IPO, they state on page 2, under 'BACKGROUND', in 3 paragraphs, remarks about subject matter that I did not give the ICO. This is because they detail that I had a long running dispute involving trade marks etc etc, which they can only have got from some IPO mouthpeice. None of that is any business of the ICO and has absolutely no bearing on what I had asked to be divulged, as you will see from what I had asked to see. This proves beyond doubt that the ICO have been heavily involved in discussions about me on a personal level and with departments that I am complaining about. ONCE MORE THE IPO HAVE INDOCTRINATED ANOTHER GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT THAT I HAVE GONE TO TO GET JUSTICE.....OTHERS INCLUDE THE DPS, THE MET, THE PARLIAMENTARY OMBUDSMAN AND SO ON.IT IS ALL A SHAM AND DISGRACEFUL and they are able to get away with it, time and again. They wouldn't if I were rich!
Their remark that I have been 'involved in a long running dispute' is said by them, to make me out as a litigious person. Yet who started all the legal actions?..ROBERT BUSBRIDGE, IN 2002 WHEN HE APPLIED TO REGISTER THE MARK THAT I OWNED AND AT THE SAME TIME APPLIED TO HAVE MY TRADE MARK MADE INVALID. ENOUGH SAID????
Now that is pretty well all the actions I could take to get Justice and they have run their course. I will next week get all the latest documents onto this blog and you can read for yourself what has gone on in my latest efforts to get Justice from a number of quarters. (The Attorney General and the ICO.) I will type out explanation remarks for each document that has been lately generated.
There will also be documents from my battle to get the Attorney General to get the Police to investigate Busbridges forgery and perjury. You will be able to see what that bastard is all about too. Another useless sickening ***** filling his pockets with Public money and refusing to help those who he is supposed to serve and by a litany of excuses and outright lies. Yet another civil servant covering up for his fellow tossers. You will see how devious he and his minion McGinty has lied as laid out in my recent post. How I am told over and over how he cannot involve himself, but tucked away I am told that if I can prove by evidence I send him, then he could take steps, yet when I do exactly that all I get is a continuation of excuses. It is all there in black and white if you care to read it all.

Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 62.

NICK HERBERT THE POLICE MINISTER.

You will see on this blog that I have written a detailed book (Justice Denied) on the whole of this sordid story of IP theft by Robert Busbridge, how I was treated by endless corrupt and useless government civil servants who sided with this conman and who then stripped me of my IP and gave it to the crook Busbridge. How I then have tried to get Justice to absolutely no effect by the following entities:-
The IPO, The Police, the IPCC, the Justice Minister Ken Clarke, The Attorney General, plus
a host of MP's including my own useless tosser, Chope and so on-ad nauseam. I wrote this book 'Justice Denied' because as I am not rich I could not afford to go to law to try and get Justice. If I had been rich none of this would have happened anyway as I would have stopped it 20 years ago by using the best law brains in IP. I also decided the book should be sent to as many influencial people and bodies as possible, and I will be commentating in the next post on who I sent the book to and how it has been receiveda nd how successful I have or have not been.
For now this post is about one of those MP's one Nick Herbert the Minister for Police. I wanted him to be able to see what the organisation he should be responsible for have done to me. So off went the book with a covering letter. Today I got the book back with a covering letter which once again tells you how our governments think about the people who put them where they are and pays their overblown wages. How they really hold us in contempt, for what they do amounts to this and insults us further. My letter to Herbert and the reply I got from one of his faceless organ monkies will shortly go onto this blog, along with all the backlog that has built up of other documents of recent times, all from similar useless costly bodies of unctuous civil servants.

" The Minister receives so much correspondence that he is unable to reply personally to all those who write to him" So it starts straight away with a put down for this was no ordinary letter....IT WAS A LONG BOOK ON A VERY SERIOUS MATTER OF CORRUPTION WHICH INCLUDED THE VERY BODY HE IS SUPPOSED TO BE IN CONTROL OF!!WHICH OBVIOUSLY HAD TAKEN THE WRITER A LONG TIME TO WRITE AND HAVE PRINTED, AT NO SMALL COST. OBVIOUSLY ALL THAT HAS GONE OVER THE EMPTY HEAD OF THIS TOSSER, OR HE IS BEING THE USUAL CYNICAL SERVANT THEY ALL SEEM TO BE?

The writer then goes into a typical civil service, wafflespeak load of tripe, in which they make all sorts of excuses rather than give you a result. I will not repeat it all here, for it is all irrelevant trash. I say this for HE IS CALLED THE MINISTER FOR POLICE. Now what should that tell us?????? The writer, another McGinty character seems to think the Minister has no control over the Police at all, so what the hell is he for, I ask? This one goes by the handle of B.McGuire of no known gender and the letter is headed The Home Office.

The very same shower who sent me a letter some months back telling me that if the Police did not investigate it was tough shit mate! They are a force unto themselves AND NO ONE CAN CONTROL THEM!! I was to take my own legal action !!!!!!!!!

This is why we are forever being assailed, almost on a daily basis, of lurid stories about how the Police have failed one poor family after another. If it isn't useless coppers cocking up an important murder investigation, they are indulging in yet more corruptness, as in today's story about how more than 8 bastards stitched up 4 innocent men for murder and are now belatedly being done themselves. To messing up the Dowler investigation and to sitting on the facts about the NOTW phone hacking story, because they were all getting back handers. The very same old firm of the Met who colluded with the IPO to stop me getting justice!!

My point in this post is that this useless overpaid tosser Nick Herbert...what is he for and why is it that his Organ Grinder Monkies are deliberately keeping from him a story that HE SHOULD KNOW ABOUT? (they probably got straight onto the phone to their IPO mates to see what it was all about and were told to bury it)......DON'T THEY MAKE YOU SICK.

Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 61.

WHAT DID I SAY TO YOU ABOUT THE ICO?????

I have now got their decision letter about my complaint about the Dorset Police Service and them not handling my request for information under the FOIA and the DPA.
You will have to go back to my posts about all that and see the attached emails and letters from me to them and vice versa.
They behaved disgracefully in the way they handled my request and basically put two fingers up to me, which is the norm these days for the Police wherever. Even a complaint to their Chief and the IPCC as you will also know from previous posts-got me absolutely nowhere.
This latest exercise in utter futility has gone exactly the same way. With yet another government department/quangoe refusing to act and siding with their bretheren fellow civil servants. The writer said that "It is likely that the DPS has complied with the requirements of the DPA" Now I don't know about you, but that is definitely not an unequivical statement made, because the writer has evidence they did. It is a wishy washy statement that one could say that equally it is unlikely they didn't. It is obvious that the ICO did not receive from the Dorset Police Service any evidence that the DPS did 100% act within the requirements of the Data Protection Act, as I am sure if they had, they would have said so in a firmer statement. In other words we are giving the benefit of the doubt to the Police because that is how we work. We do not work on behalf of complainents (the Public that is) we work for our fellow civil servants.
All my evidence that I was treated like SHIT by this lying copper Shaun Waldbridge, by him failing to deal with my request in the laid down proper manner and within DPA/FOIA rules, was cast aside and ignored as usual.
Then this Kelly Steen who wrote this garbage, further shows us all just how corrupt even her department is, by saying that the DPS 'appeared likely that they have provided you with the information held about you at the time of your request. Now as this simply did not happen we have to take it that again the ICO has seen no evidence that they did, because again they can only manage another limp 'well it is LIKELY etc etc' IT SIMPLY IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH AND IT IS EXACTLY WHAT I EXPECTED OF THEM.
Then Miss Steen compounds her uselessness by going onto state 'They have confirmed that the emails had been deleted by the time of your request'. Now what this is referring to is the ONE email I knew the IPO had sent DS Brimicombe, in which the IPO would have well and truly slagged me off and warned the DPS what a wanker I was and a trouble maker and not to have anything to do with me, let alone show me the email that would damn them all.
NOW DO NOT FORGET THAT BOTH THE DPS AND THE IPO HAVE BOTH REFUSED TO DIVULGE THIS EMAIL, NO DOUBT A DAMNING EMAIL, WHICH WOULD HANG THEM ALL.....THE ABSOLUTE BASTARDS.
What you should know is that as soon as I had got hold of the email that told me that a further email would be forthcoming to the DPS from the IPO, I asked to see it. That would be within no more than a week or so of my getting from that DS Brimicombe, a copy of the first email from the IPO to DS Brimicombe, because he left the email in my dossier that I'd given him. So are we to believe that the Police routinely get rid of all incoming emails within days of receiving them?...pull the other one. So it is yet more Police lying and the ICO going along with it.
This duplicitous Steen woman then goes into a protection mode of making excuses about how long organisations are allowed to keep emails etc before they trash them. We have to believe going on this case and what is claimed to have happened to that email, that it is only for a few days, and I simply do not belive that.
So what this means is that all three of my other requests to the ICO re the withheld documents, withheld by the Parliamentary Ombudsman, the Met Police and the IPO themselves, will end up the exact same way this has. Each organisation will trot out excuses and the ICO will back them and defend them with a litany of lying excuses.
What makes me so mad with all the government bodies that we the Public are supposed to be able to use to obtain justice against the civil service trash departments that shaft us and lie to us and side with the very people we are complaining about, are all sitting there in their vast offices all paid for by the Public purse. They consume millions of pounds of our money doing absolutely nothing. Shuffling peices of paper around making it look like they are seriously taking up complaints. When all the time, all it is is window dressing, smoke and mirrors to fool us that indeed there are organistions that will help us when we get done over by lying, useless, duplicious civil servants!! What a cesspit of iniquity the Establishment of this country are. I have said it before and I will say it again. There is no democracy in this country, no freedoms and we really live in a country no better that any dictators country or any banana Replublic. Yet these POLITICIAQNS RANT AND RAVE AT THE ASSADS AND GADAFFI'S OF THIS WORLD WHEN THEY DO TO THEIR PUBLIC THE SAME AS WE REALLY DO TO OURS. The only difference is that here the trash Politicians do it in a much more sophisticated way. They do not bump people off or make them disappear, but they just block any attempts to use the systems we are told should give us JUSTICE. It all goes back to what I have said time and again....IN THIS ROTTEN COUNTRY YOU ONLY GET JUSTICE IF YOU CAN AFFORD IT!! EVEN THEN THEY CAN STILL BLOCK YOU IF THEY WANT, BY JUST MAKING SURE YOU WILL GET A JUDGE WHO IS IN THEIR PAY LIKE JUDGE HOBBS.....(Refer to my previous posts on him and how that bumbling oaf Clarke refused to investigate his corruption (despite the evidence) and the way he manipulated the appeal hearing he was supposed to hear, in collusion with the IPO, so as to block my getting justice and showing how corrupt and useless the IPO really are.)

Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 60.

I have talked recently about my efforts to get the Attorney General to force the Police or the CPS to get Busbridge investigated for all the forgery & Perjury he committed in 8 Tribunal Hearings and one County Court case, not to mention the same crimes he committed with getting the Police to charge me in 1999.
I told you about my sending the A/Gen a dossier bundle of evidence and what one of his minions, a McGinty and his goat, eventually replied in a short page and a half reply.
You always know that the civil servants have not even read any of what you have said in long letters and or as in this case a huge bundle of well over a 100 pages of documents of evidence etc, when all they can manage in reply is a terse one and a half pages of tripe.
As I told you it boiled down to this bum saying that the Att/Gen could not interfere in the fact that all the hearing officers, nor the trial Judge had asked that perjury be investigated or the forgery. Of course they didn't, the useless lazy bastards. In the case of the IPO hearing officers they, I believe by virtue of the evidence of their actions and subsequent actions and statements made by the IPO, they wanted me to lose. That is apart from one,-the Landau decision, but there the IPO deliberately ignored his pronouncement that Busbridge was to lose and they then went onto manipulating events so that his verdict could be ignored. So this McGinty uses this as the excuse that the Att/Gen cannot and will not do anything.
However this is a BIG LIE as the CPS in a document, which I copied to this McGinty Git say " absense of such a recommendation does not mean that there is no justification for an investigation" and this means that if the oaf of a hearing officer or a Judge doesn't see what is staring him in the face, and or takes no notice that he is being told by the person against whom perjury and forgery is being committed, that is is being committed, it means that the injured person should be able to ask the Att/Gen to look into the matter, for JUSTICE IS NOT BEING SERVED by the perjury and forgery being ignored. Remember what the Scottish prosecutor said about not allowing perjury to be ignored and the very good reasons for that. It seems in England the establishment do not adhere to the high standards they do in Scotland!!!!!!!!! But then I am but a mere peasant who does not matter, and Sheridan was a well known public figure....so there you have your answer.
In fact, he then goes on to say that if I got Busbridge to admit he had lied and here I must point out that in all my efforts to get justice EVERY civil servant I come across deliberately IGNORES the fact that FORGERY has been also committed and this is because forgery is easy to prove. At least it is in my cases, but no, they don't want TO KNOW about forgery so they ignore that and stick to the perjury where they can lie and make these excuses for not acting because as McGinty said "If the matter was brought to his attention by the trial Judge (here he in his ignorance, fails to see that Judges do not hold IPO hearings, but biased Hearing Officers  who are IPO employees-do ) I am toldthat it is not enough for one party to claim that his opponent has lied, that is for the court to determine in the proceedings"
Of course they say this because they simply want to brush all this under the carpet. It leaves people like me in the hopeless situation where, because corrupt hearing officers or stupid lazy Judges either do not want to see what is happening in front of them, even when it is pointed out to them AND evidence has been put into the proceedings which show what is going on, it means you get your hands tied. It means that in every court case in upper courts or lower courts like tribunal hearings, all that happens is that people in them lie and lie and lie and they know they will get away with it BECAUSE THE SYSTEM DOES NOT WANT TO DEAL WITH LIES, AS IT IS ALL TOO MUCH FOR THE SYSTEM. IT IS EASIER TO IGNORE IT, WHICH IS WHAT IS HAPPENING TO ME. I have to suffer miscarriages of Justice and the trashing of my Human Rights under the H.R.Act that should be giving me the right to fair trials.
If I were a BLACKMAN or an ASIAN TRYING IT ON TO ENABLE ME TO STAY IN THIS COUNTRY, I WOULD BE TRAMPLED TO DEATH IN THE RUSH OF CORRUPT LAWYERS ON THE GRAVY TRAIN OF HUGE MONIES TO BE MADE, DEFENDING ALL THESE KINDS OF PEOPLE, WANTING TO TAKE ON MY CASE. Or if I were a criminal I would also be able to get a lawyer to help me win. In my case I cannot even get a Human Rights lawyer to answer an email of enquiry, let alone get them to take on the case. IT IS DISGUSTING.
IT IS ALSO DISGUSTING THAT THIS MCGINTY (AND HIS GOAT) SAYS I SHOULD GET BUSBRIDGE TO ADMIT HE LIED. IS THIS BLOODY MAN STUPID OR RUBBING IT IN TO SAY THAT, AS HE MUST KNOW THAT THIS IS THE LAST THING BUSBRIDGE WOULD DO? After being successful over 20 years of making over 200 seperate lies and forging 5 documents and he thinks he will suddenly cave in and admit to even only one lie. I WOULD LIKE TO PUKE ALL OVER THIS DEVIOUS BASTARD MCGINTY FOR WHAT HE HAS SAID TO ME, ALL IN ORDER TO SQUIRM OUT OF THE ATT/GEN DOING ANYTHING.
So there you have it, in the UK the mere ordinary bloke on the street once again gets trampled on by the Corrupt and useless Establishment who would rather see the peasants continue to suffer injustices. It saves them money and the hassle and they know we cannot resort to Law as we cannot afford the stupendous costs involved by taking on the bloodsucking lawyers, who let's face it are their friends. All of the same class. Went to the same Public schools and all that.
Lastly McGinty rubs it in by stating in his last paragraph that unless the Att/Gen has a trial Judge telling him that perjury was committed he will not act. My evidence isn't good enough. Of course the only trial Judge I ever had was the was the one in the 2000 trial at Dorchester and he saw piles of perjury AND forgery being committed and DID BUGGERALL. All the IPO Hearing Officers as I have said won't do anything as some will be dead and or retired and in any case all were employees of the IPO, so we can be sure they were not independent and on IPO orders. Read through the papers of the 1994 hearing before Reynolds and tell me that that old buffer wasn't under orders to trash all my good evidence. It was so obvious that it was a sick joke.
Now that the Att Gen saga is over as I have gone as far as I can, it is only the Information Commissioner who is left where I could get valuable evidence of collusion between the IPO and the Met Police and the DPS, but you can safely bet he will act just like all the other corrupt government bodies and it will be a whitewash. Just you see.

Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 59.

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

This guy and his office, as you will know, recently refused to order the Met Police to investigate the forgery and perjury committed by Busbridge at various court hearings and tribunal hearings over 20 years. Their vacuous and whitewashing excuses amount to nothing More than lies.

So here we have two points to consider. One in my case the IPCC behaved in a totally different way by refusing to ask the Met Police to investigate Busbridges forgery and perjury. ( On the lying excuse that I hadn't provided the Met with any proof despite my 3 inch thick dossier of evidence.
Of course I cannot ask my MP Poshboy Ellwood, to intervene as he is in on the cover up and refuses to act on my behalf.
So the A/General and his organ grinder monkey, this McGinty bloke, are lying (don't they all and all the time?) when he says the Att/Gen cannot investigate perjury that is committed in a Court. With my case where hearings had taken place, which were obviously miscarriages of justice and there was plenty of evidence of that because my human rights to fair trials/hearings had been trashed, he doesn't want to know as you have seen and that despite all the evidence I gave him.
Then very importantly and I asked the A/G about this: why was it that Busbridge was able to go the Met and allege I had committed ONE act of perjury and two acts of forgery at my hearing where I had opposed Chryslers application to register my Trade Mark and the Met swung into action straight away with an investigation through the Dorset Police? No excuses that forgery and perjury had to only be investigated on the word and request of the hearing Judge??? Double standards once again and why did the Attn/Gen ignore that question. I will tell you why....because it was too difficult to get round so he indulges via his Organ Grinder and his monkey, by ignoring it and telling porkies.
This shows how two faced he is and how he is willing to protect others in government and a consummate conman, rather than do the right thing. So he tells lies as to why he cannot investigate or ask the police to investigate, which he does all the time.
What a  ******!!

Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 58.

A few days ago I got the IPO pretending it was complying with the Freedom of Information Act and the Data Protection Act after I had reported them to the Information Commissioner for failing to give me copies of all the emails, records of telephone conversations or letters sent to the Met or the Dorset Police or the Parliamentary Ombudsman.
Initially they trickled out a few bits of paper from around 2004 which wasn't what I asked for. I complained to them and I got a few more from the time in questions but they were only copies of what I had already had,or about matters that were not what I asked for. In other words they were playing me for a fool once more, so I complained about them to the ICO.
They then with rapidity sent me a few more trickles of documents and I took them to task once more and this resulted in about a month ago, yet another exercise in duplicity. A few more documents that I already had and the documents I knew existed being ignored.
You may remember that the IPO had had emails sent between them and the Dorset Police. One I had got hold of clearly said that a guy called Hayward of the IPO was going to send an email answering questions the cop had asked him about me and my case. Obviously I needed to see this email as I can bet it contains explosive remarks which both the IPO and the Dorset pigs certainly do not want me to see. For if my intuition is right it will contain material that will incriminate both of the bastards.
So I sent this Julie woman another emails asking for this email. She sent me back an email this week saying that there are no more documents and that is that. In other words push off, that is your lot. Not answering you on the point about Haywards missing email. Of course all this is reported back to the ICO, but being yet another Government quango they will no doubt be all smoke and mirrors and will have no teeth as I have already commented on.
But what it clearly shows us is that all four bodies that have refused to give me what is my right to see only paints them black as black as they are clearly trying to hide material they know I can hang them with.....THE BASTARDS!!

Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 57.

Got the blighters letter today and it's the usual cop out you get from all these duplicitous government departments. Even if today Britain cannot do anything right, what they excel in is evading doling out Justice to the British Public, ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY KNOW TO DO SO MAY OPEN THEM UP TO BEING SUED FOR COMPENSATION!! IF ONLY I HAD THE MONEY TO DO SO.
This letter will be shortly shown on this blog under the documents link. But what it amounts to is this;

1/ When anyone in this country is part of a Tribunal Hearing that hearing will be held by a CIVIL SERVANT and NOT AN SUPPOSED INDEPENDENT JUDGE!!
2/ Any hearing Officer because he is not Independent can ignore whatever acts of forgery or perjury you show has been committed. He can ignore the evidence you show, not even discuss it at the hearing nor bring it into his decision making. In other words it is as if it were never there or had it brought to his attention. He can do this because he knows that he will never have his actions questioned by anyone and the aggrieved person will never be afforded any avenue by which he can get justice. Even when faced by a lawyer laying out how perjury has been committed he can simply ignore him and what he says and shows. He can ignore witness affidavits and statements, again with impunity.
3/ You will be faced with the fact that the hearing officer could actually be under orders to make sure that no matter what evidence he has put to him he should find for only one of the bodies involved. In my case it is my contention that the IPO did not want me to win because they knew if I did it would give me the evidence that the IPO had acted incompetently and I was of a mind to sue them. What better motive?
3/ You will be put in a situation whereby you simply have no avenue to correct these acts which constitute a miscarriage of justice. For the very court Judge (the hearing officer)can as I say, refuse to recommend the perjurer be investigated, the Police in collusion with the IPO, can decide also not to investigate and that lays both parties open the accusation that they have deliberately acted to deny justice to the aggrieved party. The IPO and the hearing officer who is an employee of the IPO know that the aggrieved will have no avenue to correct what has happened.

IS THIS WHAT DAVID CAMERON MEANT WHEN HE SAID THAT HE WAS GOING TO MAKE BRITAIN A FAIRER COUNTRY????? DENY THE PEASANTS ANY WAY THEY CAN GET JUSTICE AGAINST HIS OWN CIVIL SERVANTS????

Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 56.

I have long said that the IPCC are yet another bunch of useless overpaid civil servants who are only there the apologise and defend the Police. I've said it on this blog and in my book and NOW WE HAVE THE IRREFUTABLE PROOF. For in today's Times Newspaper they state in their Editorial Comments column that the killing of Ian Tomlinson by the Met Police was UNLAWFUL, as did the jury....God Bless them. If it were not for juries we the British Public would forever be treated corruptly by the Establishment and especially the Police.
Look at how the very same Met Police treated me when I gave them irrefutable proof that a conman namely Robert Busbridge committed gross and persistent acts of forgery and perjury, they refused to even investigate my allegations despite the masses of evidence I gave them. They even said I had not even given them any evidence at all. So their usual gross acts of persistent lying. They never even interviewed me despite commenting that they did not "UNDERSTAND" that evidence I gave them. What a shower!!
Then when you rightly complain to the IPCC you are then given the run round and then in the end they engage in a flurry of excuse making to paint what the Met did as whiter than white and nothing to worry about.
Now what has this got to do with the killing of Tomlinson? Very easy to explain that, as the IPCC as they do, had to "Investigate" that gross act by a member of the MET!! All of us in the country knew that this was yet another example of how out of control the Met are. They are nothing more than a bunch of thugs and crooks in uniform as are all the Police in this country. Not only thugs, but crooks in uniform, as well. The IPCC did exactly with that investigation as they did with mine. That is they backed the murderous actions of the Met up to the hilt and did not advise that the policeman should be charged and tried for it. So we all could see he needed to be brought to trial, yet the IPCC engage in yet another gross act of white washing and grovelling to the Police. WHAT A SHOWER!!

Corrupt Police & IPO-how they aided a crook. 55.

As you will know both the Met & the Dorset Police colluded with the IPO and I have been trying to get all three corrupt entities to cough up the documents that passed between them. The Met admitted that they had talked to the IPO about me and my asking them to investigate Busbridge for perjury and Forgery and I merely asked to see whatever letters or emails passed between them. Obviously I was refused by both of the corrupt bastards.
Now due to our wonderful politicians, they devised TWO Acts that this can be done instead of one. These are called the Freedom of information Act and the other is the Data Protection Act. Because one cannot get sight of any document how are you supposed to be able to determine which act any document may come under? The FOIA concerns I think general documents that are not solely about you and the DPA is about documents solely about you.
I had asked the Met in the first instance under the FOIA and they refused to cough up. So then I had to ask under the DPA and today they again refused. SO WHAT THIS MEANS FOLKS IS THAT THE MET ARE SAYING THEY HAVE NO DOCUMENTS WHATSOEVER WHATEVER THE ACT, OR THEY ARE SAYING THAT THEY HAVE BUT WILL NOT RELEASE THEM. Either way it shows they ARE COMPLETELY CORRUPT, AS WE ALL KNOW THAT THE REASON THEY REFUSE AND THAT IS BECAUSE THEY KNOW WHATEVER IS ON THEM WILL INCRIMINATE THE BASTARDS!!
So it now remains to be seen just how effective the ICO is and I will bet you they are as bad. I will go out and get pissed if ANY GOVERNMENT BODY ACTS COMPLETELY HONESTLY OVER THIS WHOLE AFFAIR......AND IT MUST BE IN THE SIXTIES THE LAST TIME I WAS PISSED!!

Corrupt Police & lPO-How they aided a crook. 54.

Following my complete and unsuccessful attempt to get the corrupt Met Police to charge Busbridge with Perjury & Forgery, after they colluded with the IPO, not to investigate. Probably on the grounds that to do so would bring it out into the open that the IPO have deliberately and cynically made sure Busbridge won most times over the past 10 years. So I have now been forced to go directly to the Attorney General as you can do (I have been told) with the same dossier that I gave to the Met, in order that he should set in motion an investigation. I want to see if he, one of the countries top justice people, is as corrupt as all the rest of them.
It is interesting to note that Sgt Walters of Camden Police Station who was the corrupt officer who did all this colluding with the IPO, said in his report when he refused to investigate, that I had not given him any evidence to back up my allegations of Perjury & Forgery. He also told the investigating officer of the IPCC the same pack of lies because he also used this as an excuse to exonerate Walters and rubbish me. Of course my dossier did include all the documentary evidence needed to charge Busbridge with these criminal acts.
Now hark back in this story to 1999 when Busbridge went to the Met alleging that I had forged our agency agreement document. He provided absolutely no evidence at all save him saying 'He thought it had been forged' The Met then investigated with the speed of a cavalry charge and I was charged in quick order; Isn't this so hypocritical and typical of the Met???

Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 53.

A lot has happened since my last post and none of it positive for my quest to get JUSTICE against this conman. All concern corrupt actions or should I say non actions by various government bodies and people. These are The Dorset Police, The Met Police, The Independent Police Complaints Commissioner, the Attorney General, My MP Chris Chope,  & Kenneth Clarke the Minister for Justice.
I will deal with each of these below. Firstly with:-
The Dorset Police.....You may remember I had been waiting for their response since September 2010 to my complaint to their Complaints procedures that they had refused to investigate my request to investigate the forgery and perjury of Busbridge. I had also put in requests under the Freedom of Information Act and the Data Protection Act. This was to give me all information that had passed between them and the IPO and the Met concerning Busbridges perjury etc. They are supposed to act in definite ways under these Acts and of course they ignored all the rules and so I never got a scrap of info despite my knowing there is info there as I have an email to them from the IPO which clearly states there is, which I am sure I have mentioned in recent past posts.
I eventually got in late Feb their response which was EXACTLY as I expected. You can read our wonderful Police like a book. (One on corruption that is)The copper Brimicombe lowered himself to the floor by engaging in a litany of lying about our meeting when he tried to intimidate me and put forward spurious lies as to how there had never been perjury committed (He studiously ignored the forgery) and saying that perjury could only be reported by either the Judges of the hearings or the Attorney General. When I pointed out that his Force saw no difficulty in charging me with perjury and forgery on the lies of a conman (Busbridge) without recourse to saying to Busbridge that it was the hearing officer or the Attorney General that had to do him. He had no answer to that one but it made no difference to them actually investigating my complaint.
All that is posted in previous posts and now in this knock back letter, Brimicombe shows what he really is by going into an orgy of lying himself by saying I had shouted and sworn at this hearing and had behaved in an overbearing manner. Of course I am not that stupid to do so at any meeting where I am trying to get the Police to act on my behalf. Of course his cohort copper who was present as the POLICE WITNESS backed him up by also lying. This is the what we the Public have to put up these days with our corrupt, lying scumbags that dare to call themselves Police! The reply by them will in due course be attached in full to this blog as will a number of documents that so far I have not had time to put them on.
They ignored my complaints about not giving me the info under the various Acts but that has now gone to the Information Commissioner who deals with complaints under those Acts. 

THE MET POLICE.Here their story which I have already recounted but I did complain about them to the IPCC about their refusal to also investigate perjury and forgery by Busbridge. They also refused to show me all their documents etc that went between them and the IPO. You see both Police Forces and the IPO do not want me to see any of these documents because they know they contain valuable information and facts that will show them up for what they are:- Conniving, corrupt and lying bastards who have all conspired to deny me Justice for reasons that they refuse to divulge and the emails will have given me the answer as to why they refuse the deal with BUSBRIDGE AND HIS CRIMES!

THE IPCC. YET ANOTHER USELESS GOVERNMENT CON ON THE BRITISH PUBLIC. My complaints to them about the MET which I did first was as I fully expected.....a typical whitewash so as to protect the Police. How many times have you read that the Police or a particular Policeman has actually been severely done for breaking the law???? They even get away with blatant murder,so they got away with this...easy peasy! No sweat, and they know I am impotent and so they can get away with anything. So my complaint to the IPCC got nowhere as usual, so I never bothered to report the Dorset Police as that too would have been a total waste of time.

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL MR DOMINIC GRIEVE MP. I sent him a letter late last year asking him if what the Police had said as to how perjury can get dealt with, was correct. After many months of waiting got a reply, not from Grieve but one of his pen pushers. I was told I was asking for legal advice. It completely goes over his head that what I am really asking for, is for him to say that what the police had claimed was correct or incorrect and for him to explain what his duties were over the reporting of perjury. Not asking for legal advice at all.
I replied in my usual forthright way to Grieve again and saying I was not accepting that vacuous reply and wanted an answer from him and not one of his minions. Months later.... still no reply.

THE IPO... I asked them in the same way, to release copies of all emails, letters or records of telephone conversations between them and the Met and Dorset Police Forces. They refused to release all of them but did feed me with a few snippets, a couple of them dating right back to 2004, so did not deal with the important up to date documents. They did show me that even in 2004 they had very negative attitudes to me personally and this was way before I had really started on them. So God knows what they think of me know? 

THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONERS OFFICE.I have reported both the Met and the Dorset Police and the IPO for refusing to divulge information I knew they held on me and the goings on between them and the two Police forces. I at this moment am waiting to see what transpires, but as my faith in ALL GOVERNMENT BODIES IS SHATTERED I DO NOT EXPECT THEM TO BE INDEPENDENT AND TO FORCE THESE BODIES TO COUGH UP THE DOCUMENTS. All these so called independent bodies that are supposed to help the Public get answers and Justice against recalcitrant, and corrupt Government bodies, are a sham. They have no teeth at all, not one of them, including the IPCC, so the Police are really a law unto themselves. You simply cannot get anyone to bring them in to line.
KENNETH CLARKE MP. SO CALLED JUSTICE MINISTER. I cannot stand this oaf and never have done and that goes back to the last Conservative Government. He is the epitomeof the fat, oafish, upper class Conservative twits found in numbers in this government. His reply to my first letter was not done by him but the very department that I had complained about. So it was a tainted whitewash. I wrote back in last September to lambast it and I tore it to shreds and I emphasised that I wanted HIM to deal with it and answer it. To date many months down the line and still no answer and I know I will not get one as he hasn't the guts to deal with it as he knows I am right.( This was my reporting that a Judge Hobbs QC was corrupt and the facts surrounding an appeal he heard. This asked for by Busbridge as reported by me in past posts).

THE PARLIAMENTARY OMBUDSMAN. I had reported to them the fact that the IPO had denied me Justice by having several hearings where they denied me this justice and a "Fair Trial" as required by the Human Rights Act. They had also denied me Justice by conniving with the Dorset & Met Police to again allow them to stop investigating the Forgery and Perjury as reported to them by me. Also to denying me the documents I had asked them to provide me. They sent me a long winded whitewash which again denied me the justice I seek.
At the moment I an awaiting what the ICO have to say about the FOIA and the DPA Acts being ignored, but I am not holding my breath. I also await my last complaint to the Parliamentary Ombudsman about their refusal to divulge all the letters etc as supplied to them by the IPO, when I made my complaint to them about the IPO.

Finally MY LOCAL MP, ONE CHRIS CHOPE. MP's are no better than any of their government departments....all utterly useless and self serving etc etc. I have been asking him for a couple of years now to help me over the myriad of departments I have vainly tried to get justice through. He being an ex lawyer (Aren't they all ex lawyers, these assholes in govenment and probably all were useless lawyers and that's why they went into the soft option of being an MP)should have been able to do this easily. Of course all he wants is an easy life with no effort plus all his perks and expenses etc. He's not interested in his constituents.
He has steadfastly refused to help me and he does this by ignoring all my letters asking for help. I will be reporting him to the Chief Whip who is supposed to deal with such complaints, but again I am not holding my breath.

LASTLY, I have now finished my book on the whole of this story which is called "JUSTICE DENIED" A preliminary copy of my early manuscript of this has been on this blog, but that has been edited several times and added to. SO very soon the finished article will be replacing it and the book will shortly be published. It will go out to every Law Professor in the country AND every Minister who I think is remotely responsible for every department I have complained about. I will include the Prime Minister as well.
It will also go to many people in the media as an example of how people in this country are shat upon by government and that this story is but one of thousands of examples, many of which never see the light of day. How criminals in this country are pandered to whilst law abiding citizens like me are treated with contempt and like criminals ourselves.
It will also go to many people that I think would be interested and who are in positions of power and influence, so could help to strike a blow for all of us who get regularly shat on by the Establishment, whom we pay to keep in existence.