Tuesday, 17 May 2011

Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook

Got the blighters letter today and it's the usual cop out you get from all these duplicitous government departments. Even if today Britain cannot do anything right, what they excel in is evading doling out Justice to the British Public, ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY KNOW TO DO SO MAY OPEN THEM UP TO BEING SUED FOR COMPENSATION!! IF ONLY I HAD THE MONEY TO DO SO.
This letter will be shortly shown on this blog under the documents link.But what it amounts to is this;

1/ When anyone in this country is part of a Tribunal Hearing that hearing will be held by a CIVIL SERVANT and NOT AN SUPPOSED INDEPENDENT JUDGE!!
2/ Any hearing Officer because he is not Independent can ignore whatever acts of forgery or perjury you show has been committed. He can ignore the evidence you show, not even discuss it at the hearing nor bring it into his decision making. In other words it is as if it were never there or had it brought to his attention. He can do this because he knows that he will never have his actions questioned by anyone and the aggrieved person will never be afforded any avenue by which he can get justice. Even when faced by a lawyer laying out how perjury has been committed he can simply ignore him and what he says and shows. He can ignore witness affidavits and statements, again with impunity.
3/ You will be faced with the fact that the hearing officer could actually be under orders to make sure that no matter what evidence he has put to him he should find for only one of the bodies involved. In my case it is my contention that the IPO did not want me to win because they knew if I did it would give me the evidence that the IPO had acted incompetently and I was of a mind to sue them. What better motive?
3/ You will be put in a situation whereby you simply have no avenue to correct these acts which constitute a miscarriage of justice. For the very court Judge (the hearing officer)can as I say, refuse to recommend the perjurer be investigated, the Police in collusion with the IPO, can decide also not to investigate and that lays both parties open the accusation that they have deliberately acted to deny justice to the aggrieved party. The IPO and the hearing officer who is an employee of the IPO know that the aggrieved will have no avenue to correct what has happened.

IS THIS WHAT DAVID CAMERON MEANT WHEN HE SAID THAT HE WAS GOING TO MAKE BRITAIN A FAIRER COUNTRY????? DENY THE PEASANTS ANY WAY THEY CAN GET JUSTICE AGAINST HIS OWN CIVIL SERVANTS????

No comments: