POSSIBILITES RE CHYSLER & THE IPO>
Those of you who have been following this enquiry may like me have been appalled by the antics of the various ex Met chiefs who have been interviewed. What a bunch of twisting liars they presented as. Of course two of them who were supposed to be running the Met, when I was trying to get those useless bastards to investigate Busbridge. Stevens was one and he as with the rest, lied his head of about what he knew about the phone hacking.
One of them had to resign because of his involvement in dubious goings on. Now what really hacks me off is the deafening silence we always get when the media expose our useless and corrupt cops. During all these sickening relevations of the past weeks at this enquiry, not one politician has voiced his concern that we obviously have a throughly discredited and corrupt police force in the Met and this force is supposed to be the premier force of the UK. Of course all the different forces are the same but the Met should be a shining example, which it simply isn't and never has been. Except it is a shining example of just how corrupt coppers can be.
No, our pollies don't seem to be in the slightest bit bothered, when what they should be doing is going all out to expose them for what they are and cleaning the filth up. So the bastards just keep getting away with it....the incompetence and the corruption just carries on.
I rarely meet anyone who has any time for the BASTARDS these days and I am talking here about people I know or meet, who like me cannot stand our police and have no time for them at all, not those who are criminals or yobs, as I do not mix with the trash of Brit life in any way. These are all people like myself, professionals or business people and the like. How have we got to the stage in Brit life when so few people have the slightest faith in the very people who are supposed to be there to protect us from the scum of the Earth???
Going back to what I have said in the past few posts as to why did the IPO behaved in the way it did over this whole case. Many may think that my thoughts on what was the reasons the IPO did what they did and the possible actions Chysler may have carried out, are too far fetched. Well think about this; in addition to what I've already put forward, Chrysler when they started to export their Vipers to Europe, spent a lot of money in promoting their car. They set up a special racing series for that car and as I've said no Yanky international company will spend what they did only to have some upstart like me get in their way of being able to call their car in the UK, by the name of Viper.
That is eactly what I did, first by stopping them from being able to register that name in the UK after I won that hearing with the IPO in 1996. What Chyrysler did after that was to deliberately try and ruin me with legal costs by saying they were going to appeal it and then dragging their feet for FOUR YEARS until I went to a legal team and FORCED them to give up. They KNEW they had no case, so why did they behave like this......BECAUSE LIKE SO MANY YANK COMPANIES.... THEY HAD NO MORALS.
Even after they had to drop their saying they wanted to appeal, they carried on calling their car, in the UK, by MY REGISTERED NAME OF VIPER. So I had to take legal action which stopped them and they had to pay my costs.
Now what I am trying to point out to you, is that any company that behaves in the corrupt and immoral way, like they did for over ten years and over them wanting to own that name, IS PERFECTLY CAPABLE OF PAYING SOMEONE IN THE IPO FROM THE BEGINNING BACK IN 1992, TO SWING THINGS FOR THEM. And of course anyone in the IPO who was part of that corrupt action, would do anything to hide that fact and that would include doing to me what they did and making sure that Busbridge got the T/M, as they knew he was in with Chrysler. They knew that once he got the rego of the T/M, he would sell it to Chrsyler and then Chrysler will have got what they wanted. Of course what they never realised at the beginning is that I would put up such a fight which made all the procedures last for going on 20 years.
There will be those of you who will know that long before that period of time was reached, Chryslers fortunes took a big turn for the worse and they very nearly went out of business. Also in the meantime their Viper simply never took off in the UK or Europe as it was a typical peice of Yank rubbish as far as sportscars went and not really the type of sportscar Europeans go for.. They never sold very many at all.
However whoever in the IPO got themselves in the pay and involved with Chrysler had by doing that, carried out corruption and illegal activities which they would have to cover up. It is not such a tall story at all as these things happen all the time in the civil service for if you like me, follow what goes on in British life will know. Civil servants get themselves into corruption all the time and let us not forget......... THAT THE POLICE ARE ALL CIVIL SERVANTS THEMSELVES AND LOOK AT WHAT CORRUPTION THEY HAVE BEEN INVOLVE IN, OVER ALL OF MY LIFETIME AND SOME OF WHICH IS NOW COMING OUT INTO THE OPEN!!!!
STILL THINK CIVIL SERVANTS ARE AS CLEAN AS A WHISTLE?
Friday, 9 March 2012
Monday, 27 February 2012
Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 67.
CORRUPT GOVERNMENT>FACTS THAT PROVE THIS>
Now that the Leveson enquiry has reached the point where a top woman Police Officer has just reported facts that I have been saying in this blog for three years now; that all government departments are steeped in corruption because too many of its officials have been up to their necks in corrupt practices. Mainly by taking back handers from the media and others.
Well tell us something new is what I say. Of course in my case they have been corrupt in that way, I am sure, and in other ways which I have highlighted in this blog and my book, over and over again. Now this is all out in the open I feel that I must now put forward my own ideas that I have had for a long time, as to just how the IPO have been corrupt over the 20 year history with them.
So here is what I feel is a real and feasible explanation as to why they acted against me and went to the ends of the earth to see me stripped of my IP in the Trade Mark Viper, I so obviously and legally owned. One has to go back to the beginning of my blog and see how things started off. The reason Busbridge tried to prove he owned my Mark Viper, was simply because he found out that Chrysler wanted to register that mark for itself, starting with their application to register it in Jan 1990. They did not realise that I had been using it since Jan 1986 and therefore had prior usage and the first claim to it, but I had not registered or applied to register it. However this did not negate my rights to it and Chrysler simply did not do their homework and search everywhere as to if someone else was using it. Or they thought they were so powerful they could brush aside people like me.
I feel that when Busbridge contacted them, ( and don't forget I took him on as an agent in eraly 1988 so any connection (as my agent) goes to that date) it is entirely possible that they then did do some exploring of the UK car trade and if so, they would have seen straight away that I had a powerful claim to it and that Busbridge DID NOT. For instance I did the 1987 London Car Show at Earls Court which is where I got the multi million pound order from Japan. So any decent person would say that I was perfectly legally the user of that Mark. He was unable to produce ANY evidence that he had used it IN ANY WAY prior to Feb/March 1988 when I licensed him to use my mark as my London agent.
I believe that they then decided that the easiest way to get rid of me was to use Busbridge to smear my name with accusations that I had committed forgery when I produced a copy of the license I gave Busbridge in 1989 a proof that any claims he was making that he owned the mark were a lie and completely false. He of course colluded with them over this.
One also has to take into consideration that Chrysler are obviously an American company and so many such companies are thoroughly corrupt and will do anything to get their own way. Understand this if you will; they had made their Viper sports car in the States and then they decided to sell it in Europe. No American company would do that if they did not expect to be able to sell many Vipers. They would not have taken such steps to just sell a few and to be able sell they would need to register the Mark Viper in ALL the European countries. In all the countries in Europe they would meet no resistance to doing this as no one else was using the mark there. In the UK they met resistance from Busbridge in the first instance and then me when I found out what he and they were up to and this in 1992.
I believe that they thought that if they first of all got rid of me with the help of Busbridge, (as I obviously had the stronger claim to the Mark) then they would have no trouble to get rid of him as he was standing on quicksands as he could show no evidence that would be accepted as real proof as to his bona-fide ownership. To do this they had to get my opposition to them registering the Mark, heard first.
The trouble for them was, that I believe that the IPO should have actually given Busbridge first shot at opposing their application, as he applied shortly before me to oppose them. (And that fact should in no way make it that he had the stronger claim as the IPO later on claimed for any claim to a T/M should rest solely on who used it first and not who applied to register it first) Now the thing was they did not do that but gave ME first shot and the hearing in 1995 was held with them using Busbridge as their supposed witness against me and using these false allegations of forgery. Why did this happen in this order, one has to ask?
So the most way they did this was through the London based Intellectual lawyers that Chryslers were using at that time. Throughout all the time I have been involved in this thoroughly corrupt tale I have seen that many intellectual property law companies are up to their necks in it with the IPO. I do not believe that when you have a situation were lawyers are in constant contact with such a governmental organisation as the IPO, that they are not going to make cosy alliances and arrangements with the IPO. This so that cases can be conducted in an easy alliance in such a way as can only be done in such a place like England. Let us not forget that we are dealing here with the UK Establishment, with its Public schoolboy set and their "you scratch my back and I will scratch yours" and all that kind of stuff. IP lawyers will want an easy life and so will the civil servant lot in the IPO, who in the top ranks will have similar backgrounds to their lawyer buddies in the law firms.
So I believe that Chrysler will have told their lawyers to fix it so that someone high up in the IPO makes sure that the rules are bent in Chryslers favour. WHAT OTHER EXPLANATION IS THERE FOR THE IPO TO HAVE PUT ME IN FIRST TO OPPOSE CHRYSLER WHEN BUSBRIDGE SHOULD HAVE BEEN OPPOSING THEM FIRST????
However to get the IPO to direct me to have my opposition application heard first is against their own rules as the first application should be heard first, but had that happened it would have almost certainly failed for Busbridge for as I have said-he had no case. He would have then been cast out of the way for good and then Chrsylers would still have had to deal with my bona-fide application with its strong irrefutable evidence of first usage of the mark.
If you read all the evidence of what has gone on since that first fateful opposition hearing you will see time and again that the IPO and its corrupt officials have taken steps to thwart me. Breaking the rules again and again. The only possible explanation for the perplexing questions of; "why did the IPO make all these corrupt actions just to make sure I had my registration taken away from me after I had gained registration"
You may say "well you did gain registration and so how did that happen of the IPO was so corrupt and in the pay of Chrsyler?" Well you see that hearing which Chrysler thought they had in the bag, actually went against them. I believe that the hearing officer who heard that case in 1995 was not obeying orders to find against me and that put the cat amongst the pigeons. ( you might say he was an incorruptible civil servant) Why do I think this is what happened? Well you have to look at a few remarks that have slipped out along the way and have been made by IPO officials. Like the remark that was made by Judge Hobbs to Busbridge in his later hearing where he colluded with the IPO head manager, a Mr James, to swing that hearing totally in Busbridges favour, give him all the corrupt help and ideas as to how he should proceed so that the IPO could then swing things around and back to his favour and enable him to proceed and complete his stealing of my trade mark. He (Hobbs)alluded the the travesty of that hearing of mine against Chrysler, in 1995 and what he really meant was that it had not gone the way that Chrysler and the IPO had wanted it to. The hearing Hobbs heard, you will see if you have read all this blog or my book was heard because another straight hearing officer actually, at yet another hearing found for me a pointed out that Busbridge had no rights to the mark and for several reasons. So Busbridge had to appeal this or get knocked out completely AND the IPO just had to find reasons and ways in which to correct matters for them and Chrysler. They set this hearing up with a thoroughly in their pocket Judge, to advise Busbridge how he could take steps to circumvent the previous judgement that he lost and thus get back on track and that way the IPO could swing things their way and for him and Chrysler. Thus getting rid of me at last.
Because of the cock-up of me winning the 1995 opposition hearing against Chrysler, the IPO had to go through the motions of giving me registration and then find reasons to take it back off me. (you will have to read all the history to see how all that was done and why.) I believe that someone high up was paid a back hander and it could have been more than one person that was paid off by Chrsyler, no doubt through their lawyer, and this too meant that all those implicated would be scared shitless that they would be found out. That would mean that it was imperative that they destroyed me and my business, so as to get rid of me. You can see that this was on their minds by the remarks the hearing officer made in that last hearing in 2010 when they completed their dirty deeds and against all the overwhelming evidence against them and Busbridge....and stripped me of my legally registered trade mark.
You can also see how the IPO have worked to stop me getting Justice when they colluded with the thoroughly corrupt Met Police to block my attempts to get the Met to investigate the forgery and perjury of Busbridge at ALL the 8 hearings that took place and the Trial I had to undergo in 2000.
You may say that I am dreaming and making all this up and these kind of things just do not go on. If you think that, then it is you who is the dreamer who simply is not living on this planet. For now it is all out and quite clear just what goes on with all the rotten corrupt civil servants, the Police and especially the Met Police, who have been taking bribes for years off the media and others. If they are capable of doing that, then a simple case of taking back handers off another corrupt American global company who will do anything for the bottom Dollar, is complete chicken feed and VERY probable. For the facts of this case contains so many FACTS that are inexplicable and can only be explained by something having gone on in such a way as I have outlined above and in my book "Justice Denied" and other places in this blog.
Now that the Leveson enquiry has reached the point where a top woman Police Officer has just reported facts that I have been saying in this blog for three years now; that all government departments are steeped in corruption because too many of its officials have been up to their necks in corrupt practices. Mainly by taking back handers from the media and others.
Well tell us something new is what I say. Of course in my case they have been corrupt in that way, I am sure, and in other ways which I have highlighted in this blog and my book, over and over again. Now this is all out in the open I feel that I must now put forward my own ideas that I have had for a long time, as to just how the IPO have been corrupt over the 20 year history with them.
So here is what I feel is a real and feasible explanation as to why they acted against me and went to the ends of the earth to see me stripped of my IP in the Trade Mark Viper, I so obviously and legally owned. One has to go back to the beginning of my blog and see how things started off. The reason Busbridge tried to prove he owned my Mark Viper, was simply because he found out that Chrysler wanted to register that mark for itself, starting with their application to register it in Jan 1990. They did not realise that I had been using it since Jan 1986 and therefore had prior usage and the first claim to it, but I had not registered or applied to register it. However this did not negate my rights to it and Chrysler simply did not do their homework and search everywhere as to if someone else was using it. Or they thought they were so powerful they could brush aside people like me.
I feel that when Busbridge contacted them, ( and don't forget I took him on as an agent in eraly 1988 so any connection (as my agent) goes to that date) it is entirely possible that they then did do some exploring of the UK car trade and if so, they would have seen straight away that I had a powerful claim to it and that Busbridge DID NOT. For instance I did the 1987 London Car Show at Earls Court which is where I got the multi million pound order from Japan. So any decent person would say that I was perfectly legally the user of that Mark. He was unable to produce ANY evidence that he had used it IN ANY WAY prior to Feb/March 1988 when I licensed him to use my mark as my London agent.
I believe that they then decided that the easiest way to get rid of me was to use Busbridge to smear my name with accusations that I had committed forgery when I produced a copy of the license I gave Busbridge in 1989 a proof that any claims he was making that he owned the mark were a lie and completely false. He of course colluded with them over this.
One also has to take into consideration that Chrysler are obviously an American company and so many such companies are thoroughly corrupt and will do anything to get their own way. Understand this if you will; they had made their Viper sports car in the States and then they decided to sell it in Europe. No American company would do that if they did not expect to be able to sell many Vipers. They would not have taken such steps to just sell a few and to be able sell they would need to register the Mark Viper in ALL the European countries. In all the countries in Europe they would meet no resistance to doing this as no one else was using the mark there. In the UK they met resistance from Busbridge in the first instance and then me when I found out what he and they were up to and this in 1992.
I believe that they thought that if they first of all got rid of me with the help of Busbridge, (as I obviously had the stronger claim to the Mark) then they would have no trouble to get rid of him as he was standing on quicksands as he could show no evidence that would be accepted as real proof as to his bona-fide ownership. To do this they had to get my opposition to them registering the Mark, heard first.
The trouble for them was, that I believe that the IPO should have actually given Busbridge first shot at opposing their application, as he applied shortly before me to oppose them. (And that fact should in no way make it that he had the stronger claim as the IPO later on claimed for any claim to a T/M should rest solely on who used it first and not who applied to register it first) Now the thing was they did not do that but gave ME first shot and the hearing in 1995 was held with them using Busbridge as their supposed witness against me and using these false allegations of forgery. Why did this happen in this order, one has to ask?
So the most way they did this was through the London based Intellectual lawyers that Chryslers were using at that time. Throughout all the time I have been involved in this thoroughly corrupt tale I have seen that many intellectual property law companies are up to their necks in it with the IPO. I do not believe that when you have a situation were lawyers are in constant contact with such a governmental organisation as the IPO, that they are not going to make cosy alliances and arrangements with the IPO. This so that cases can be conducted in an easy alliance in such a way as can only be done in such a place like England. Let us not forget that we are dealing here with the UK Establishment, with its Public schoolboy set and their "you scratch my back and I will scratch yours" and all that kind of stuff. IP lawyers will want an easy life and so will the civil servant lot in the IPO, who in the top ranks will have similar backgrounds to their lawyer buddies in the law firms.
So I believe that Chrysler will have told their lawyers to fix it so that someone high up in the IPO makes sure that the rules are bent in Chryslers favour. WHAT OTHER EXPLANATION IS THERE FOR THE IPO TO HAVE PUT ME IN FIRST TO OPPOSE CHRYSLER WHEN BUSBRIDGE SHOULD HAVE BEEN OPPOSING THEM FIRST????
However to get the IPO to direct me to have my opposition application heard first is against their own rules as the first application should be heard first, but had that happened it would have almost certainly failed for Busbridge for as I have said-he had no case. He would have then been cast out of the way for good and then Chrsylers would still have had to deal with my bona-fide application with its strong irrefutable evidence of first usage of the mark.
If you read all the evidence of what has gone on since that first fateful opposition hearing you will see time and again that the IPO and its corrupt officials have taken steps to thwart me. Breaking the rules again and again. The only possible explanation for the perplexing questions of; "why did the IPO make all these corrupt actions just to make sure I had my registration taken away from me after I had gained registration"
You may say "well you did gain registration and so how did that happen of the IPO was so corrupt and in the pay of Chrsyler?" Well you see that hearing which Chrysler thought they had in the bag, actually went against them. I believe that the hearing officer who heard that case in 1995 was not obeying orders to find against me and that put the cat amongst the pigeons. ( you might say he was an incorruptible civil servant) Why do I think this is what happened? Well you have to look at a few remarks that have slipped out along the way and have been made by IPO officials. Like the remark that was made by Judge Hobbs to Busbridge in his later hearing where he colluded with the IPO head manager, a Mr James, to swing that hearing totally in Busbridges favour, give him all the corrupt help and ideas as to how he should proceed so that the IPO could then swing things around and back to his favour and enable him to proceed and complete his stealing of my trade mark. He (Hobbs)alluded the the travesty of that hearing of mine against Chrysler, in 1995 and what he really meant was that it had not gone the way that Chrysler and the IPO had wanted it to. The hearing Hobbs heard, you will see if you have read all this blog or my book was heard because another straight hearing officer actually, at yet another hearing found for me a pointed out that Busbridge had no rights to the mark and for several reasons. So Busbridge had to appeal this or get knocked out completely AND the IPO just had to find reasons and ways in which to correct matters for them and Chrysler. They set this hearing up with a thoroughly in their pocket Judge, to advise Busbridge how he could take steps to circumvent the previous judgement that he lost and thus get back on track and that way the IPO could swing things their way and for him and Chrysler. Thus getting rid of me at last.
Because of the cock-up of me winning the 1995 opposition hearing against Chrysler, the IPO had to go through the motions of giving me registration and then find reasons to take it back off me. (you will have to read all the history to see how all that was done and why.) I believe that someone high up was paid a back hander and it could have been more than one person that was paid off by Chrsyler, no doubt through their lawyer, and this too meant that all those implicated would be scared shitless that they would be found out. That would mean that it was imperative that they destroyed me and my business, so as to get rid of me. You can see that this was on their minds by the remarks the hearing officer made in that last hearing in 2010 when they completed their dirty deeds and against all the overwhelming evidence against them and Busbridge....and stripped me of my legally registered trade mark.
You can also see how the IPO have worked to stop me getting Justice when they colluded with the thoroughly corrupt Met Police to block my attempts to get the Met to investigate the forgery and perjury of Busbridge at ALL the 8 hearings that took place and the Trial I had to undergo in 2000.
You may say that I am dreaming and making all this up and these kind of things just do not go on. If you think that, then it is you who is the dreamer who simply is not living on this planet. For now it is all out and quite clear just what goes on with all the rotten corrupt civil servants, the Police and especially the Met Police, who have been taking bribes for years off the media and others. If they are capable of doing that, then a simple case of taking back handers off another corrupt American global company who will do anything for the bottom Dollar, is complete chicken feed and VERY probable. For the facts of this case contains so many FACTS that are inexplicable and can only be explained by something having gone on in such a way as I have outlined above and in my book "Justice Denied" and other places in this blog.
Thursday, 15 December 2011
Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 66.
The Intellectual Property Office which is yet another governmental body of asshole civil servants who are never wrong and who have things so well wrapped up that no one member of the British Public (apart from rich ones)can ever get Justice against, when these bastards decide they are going to do you over.
This is what this whole blog is about (in case you haven't been reading it from the start in 2008). They of course decided for reasons best known to them that they would allow a conman to steal all my IP, thus ruining my whole life. (as outlined in this blog).
Now, on idly searching the web under "Complaints against the IPO" I could see website after website set up by these assholes. ( I make no apology for calling them assholes, either) Amongst the many websites they show are some that highlight that if one is not happy with the IPO, there are procedures by which one can make complaints about them. Seeing that you would think that this is all very fair and you will be safe.
Let me tell you the truth. I have used these so called safe guards many times and they are a con on the Public. They are a set up and designed to go through all the motions that a complaints procedure is being carried out, but the outcome is predetermined against you ever winning. No Sir!! I have even complained to their CEO's (three different ones at different times as they seem to change them frequently) Even though I laid out in very clear terms with evidence, that I had been dumped on and that the IPO's own laws had been disregarded and broken, most of what I said was ignored and the rest twisted so as to appear that nothing wrong had ever happened. So you get nowhere. AND there is really no way you can appeal to anyone 100% INDEPENDENT!!
You can ultimately complain to the Parliamentary Ombudsman, but what in REALITY is he?? Well they would have you believe that they ARE independent, but they are LIARS. For all these people are, are yet ANOTHER BUNCH OF LYING, CORRUPT AND TWISTED CIVIL SERVANTS only there to protect their fellow civil servants. For they do exactly the same as anyone in the IPO does and that is ignore your evidence of wrongdoing, make loads of excuses on behalf of their brothers in arms and all this takes 6-9 months before you get your inevitable whitewash letter rejecting all your complaints and evidence. WELCOME TO JUSTICE 'BRITISH STYLE' RUN BY THE VERY PEOPLE YOU PAY TO KEEP IN EXISTENCE, IN THEIR CUSHY JOBS WITH EARLY RETIREMENT ON HUGE PENSIONS....THEY ARE ALL ASSHOLES AND SHOULD BE AS JEREMY CLARKSON SAID....SHOT IN FRONT OF THEIR FAMILIES. (For Treason and crimes against the British Public)
This is what this whole blog is about (in case you haven't been reading it from the start in 2008). They of course decided for reasons best known to them that they would allow a conman to steal all my IP, thus ruining my whole life. (as outlined in this blog).
Now, on idly searching the web under "Complaints against the IPO" I could see website after website set up by these assholes. ( I make no apology for calling them assholes, either) Amongst the many websites they show are some that highlight that if one is not happy with the IPO, there are procedures by which one can make complaints about them. Seeing that you would think that this is all very fair and you will be safe.
Let me tell you the truth. I have used these so called safe guards many times and they are a con on the Public. They are a set up and designed to go through all the motions that a complaints procedure is being carried out, but the outcome is predetermined against you ever winning. No Sir!! I have even complained to their CEO's (three different ones at different times as they seem to change them frequently) Even though I laid out in very clear terms with evidence, that I had been dumped on and that the IPO's own laws had been disregarded and broken, most of what I said was ignored and the rest twisted so as to appear that nothing wrong had ever happened. So you get nowhere. AND there is really no way you can appeal to anyone 100% INDEPENDENT!!
You can ultimately complain to the Parliamentary Ombudsman, but what in REALITY is he?? Well they would have you believe that they ARE independent, but they are LIARS. For all these people are, are yet ANOTHER BUNCH OF LYING, CORRUPT AND TWISTED CIVIL SERVANTS only there to protect their fellow civil servants. For they do exactly the same as anyone in the IPO does and that is ignore your evidence of wrongdoing, make loads of excuses on behalf of their brothers in arms and all this takes 6-9 months before you get your inevitable whitewash letter rejecting all your complaints and evidence. WELCOME TO JUSTICE 'BRITISH STYLE' RUN BY THE VERY PEOPLE YOU PAY TO KEEP IN EXISTENCE, IN THEIR CUSHY JOBS WITH EARLY RETIREMENT ON HUGE PENSIONS....THEY ARE ALL ASSHOLES AND SHOULD BE AS JEREMY CLARKSON SAID....SHOT IN FRONT OF THEIR FAMILIES. (For Treason and crimes against the British Public)
Wednesday, 17 August 2011
Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 65.
THE ICO
A few posts back I told you about how the Information Commissioners Office had dealt with my complaints about the IPO, the Met and the Dorset Police had refused to release to me documents that had been created after I had asked the Police to investigate Busbridge for forgery and perjury.
Of course the ICO are EXACTLY the same as all other quangoes and departments set up by government to give the illusion that if you are steam rollered over by a government body, you can at least go to some commissioner or other body to get redress. ITS ALL A SHAM AND NON OF THESE BODIES DO ANYTHING OTHER THAN PROTECT THE VERY BODIES YOU COMPLAIN ABOUT.......this is laughingly known as DEMOCRACY!!! If you believe in these bodies then your stupid and should be put away for your safety.
I know that the IPO sent DC Brimicombe of Dorset Police an email in which they supposedly gave him advice on whether perjury and forgery had been committed in their hearings. I know that because this oaf of a slimeball copper, told me he'd received this advice. Now how did he receive it?.......obviously through the email that the IPO said they were going to send him with this advice on it!!! Isn't that crystal clear? Yet it isn't apparently to the ICO. The IPO gave me copies of various emails etc but not this crucial email which they refuse to even comment on. The Dorset Police told the ICO that it had been destroyed so that proves its existence.
Yet in their latest letter to me today the ICO say "there is no strong evidence that it holds the disputed email now, if indeed it were ever held"
Now that statement just shows you how cynical these bastards are. First of all the IPO gave me copies of a few emails etc dating back years, yet miraculously now the ICO are hinting that this ONE EMAIL may not be around anymore! If it isn't then it has been cynically destroyed by the IPO so they cannot release it and this being the same as the DPS say they did to it. (If either ever did do this)
Then the cynical ICO hint that it just may be a figment of my imagination, and one has to ask, where did they get that idea from???? Yet why would the IPO tell Brimicombe they would send him this email with all the info in it that he'd asked for, and then not send it and why did this man then tell me he'd got all this info off the IPO and because of what he was told he would not investigate Busbridge. No doubt he was also told by the IPO I was a trouble maker, a nuisance, a nutter etc etc ad nauseam!! Hence why both the IPO & the DPS refused to let me see this email and now we have the ICO even saying they doubt it ever existed.... the bastards. So how can anyone have any faith that they are neutral and not as corrupt as all the other bastards in this story????
Then of course let us not forget that there was also another document, either a letter or an email that the IPO would have sent the Met in which they gave the same advice on me and all those hearings and whether perjury and forgery were committed.
The ICO ignored that complaint by me when I complained about the Met, just like they have done with the IPO & the DPS......what a corrupt shower.
These latest documents from the ICO to me and mine to them will show you all and will be put on this blog along with all the other documents.
This latest letter from the ICO was in reply to my complaint to them about their decision document of the 12th July, in which they exonerated the IPO and the DPS of all that I had complained about. I complained that many things I had said had been ignored and that I wanted them to answer my questions about that. Of course what happens when you ask specific questions to civil servants THEY ALWAYS IGNORE THEM AS IF YOU'D NEVER EVEN ASKED THEM. You will see this on those documents as I have notated on the copy of my letter where these questions have been ignored. You will also see that both the Freedom of Information Act and the Data Protection Acts are a completed farce and another con on the Public of Britain. You can ask for documents but if they will incriminate any civil servants you will not get them and you will be fed a whole bunch of excuses and be given so called parts of these acts, that allegedly give them the right to withhold what you seek. SO WHAT IS THE POINT OF THESE ACTS, I ASK????? Also you would have to be a good lawyer to know if what they tell you about these alleged parts of the Acts, are actually the truth or just made up. So they know that you as a non lawyer, will never know if you are being conned.
A few posts back I told you about how the Information Commissioners Office had dealt with my complaints about the IPO, the Met and the Dorset Police had refused to release to me documents that had been created after I had asked the Police to investigate Busbridge for forgery and perjury.
Of course the ICO are EXACTLY the same as all other quangoes and departments set up by government to give the illusion that if you are steam rollered over by a government body, you can at least go to some commissioner or other body to get redress. ITS ALL A SHAM AND NON OF THESE BODIES DO ANYTHING OTHER THAN PROTECT THE VERY BODIES YOU COMPLAIN ABOUT.......this is laughingly known as DEMOCRACY!!! If you believe in these bodies then your stupid and should be put away for your safety.
I know that the IPO sent DC Brimicombe of Dorset Police an email in which they supposedly gave him advice on whether perjury and forgery had been committed in their hearings. I know that because this oaf of a slimeball copper, told me he'd received this advice. Now how did he receive it?.......obviously through the email that the IPO said they were going to send him with this advice on it!!! Isn't that crystal clear? Yet it isn't apparently to the ICO. The IPO gave me copies of various emails etc but not this crucial email which they refuse to even comment on. The Dorset Police told the ICO that it had been destroyed so that proves its existence.
Yet in their latest letter to me today the ICO say "there is no strong evidence that it holds the disputed email now, if indeed it were ever held"
Now that statement just shows you how cynical these bastards are. First of all the IPO gave me copies of a few emails etc dating back years, yet miraculously now the ICO are hinting that this ONE EMAIL may not be around anymore! If it isn't then it has been cynically destroyed by the IPO so they cannot release it and this being the same as the DPS say they did to it. (If either ever did do this)
Then the cynical ICO hint that it just may be a figment of my imagination, and one has to ask, where did they get that idea from???? Yet why would the IPO tell Brimicombe they would send him this email with all the info in it that he'd asked for, and then not send it and why did this man then tell me he'd got all this info off the IPO and because of what he was told he would not investigate Busbridge. No doubt he was also told by the IPO I was a trouble maker, a nuisance, a nutter etc etc ad nauseam!! Hence why both the IPO & the DPS refused to let me see this email and now we have the ICO even saying they doubt it ever existed.... the bastards. So how can anyone have any faith that they are neutral and not as corrupt as all the other bastards in this story????
Then of course let us not forget that there was also another document, either a letter or an email that the IPO would have sent the Met in which they gave the same advice on me and all those hearings and whether perjury and forgery were committed.
The ICO ignored that complaint by me when I complained about the Met, just like they have done with the IPO & the DPS......what a corrupt shower.
These latest documents from the ICO to me and mine to them will show you all and will be put on this blog along with all the other documents.
This latest letter from the ICO was in reply to my complaint to them about their decision document of the 12th July, in which they exonerated the IPO and the DPS of all that I had complained about. I complained that many things I had said had been ignored and that I wanted them to answer my questions about that. Of course what happens when you ask specific questions to civil servants THEY ALWAYS IGNORE THEM AS IF YOU'D NEVER EVEN ASKED THEM. You will see this on those documents as I have notated on the copy of my letter where these questions have been ignored. You will also see that both the Freedom of Information Act and the Data Protection Acts are a completed farce and another con on the Public of Britain. You can ask for documents but if they will incriminate any civil servants you will not get them and you will be fed a whole bunch of excuses and be given so called parts of these acts, that allegedly give them the right to withhold what you seek. SO WHAT IS THE POINT OF THESE ACTS, I ASK????? Also you would have to be a good lawyer to know if what they tell you about these alleged parts of the Acts, are actually the truth or just made up. So they know that you as a non lawyer, will never know if you are being conned.
Monday, 18 July 2011
Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 64.
THE MET POLICE AGAIN.
If you have been reading all the publicity over the weekend about the Met you will know that the head of this useless and corrupt shower, Paul Stephenson has resigned. So he should and this is the ***t that ignored my letter to him about the corrupt goings on between his men at Camden and the IPO. The conniving and colluding in order to stop me from getting justice over Busbridges criminal activities.
You will remember also that both corrupt bodies refused to release to me the incriminating documents that would have proved that they were corrupt and indulging in ILLEGAL ACTIVITES by colluding together to deny me justice.
So I am heartedly glad he's gone the bastard. I hope he and that other twerp Yates, rot in hell, but then both will still get their gold plated HUGE pensions etc and will now be able to live the life of Riley, so they will not mind one bit, I am sure!
THE DICTIONARY STATES:- CORRUPT...lacking in integrity, open to or involving in bribery or other dishonest practices, putrid or rotten....CORRUPTION, the act of corrupting or state of being corrupt...dishonesty. So those of you who probably think I use this word with gay abandon, think again! I think that my constant use of this word is entirely justified, as I use it in the context of describing the goings on of ALL the government departments that I have been forced to have to go to and then have to put up with their rotten acts of corrupt practices.
Certainly the Met are the most corrupt police force in the UK and always have been. However other forces are also corrupt too, like my local force the Dorset Shower. Not many people in Dorset have much good to say about them, either and you should read my link to the website called Dorset police.Then you will see some of the goings on they get up to. Same as the Met but on a smaller scale.
If you have been reading all the publicity over the weekend about the Met you will know that the head of this useless and corrupt shower, Paul Stephenson has resigned. So he should and this is the ***t that ignored my letter to him about the corrupt goings on between his men at Camden and the IPO. The conniving and colluding in order to stop me from getting justice over Busbridges criminal activities.
You will remember also that both corrupt bodies refused to release to me the incriminating documents that would have proved that they were corrupt and indulging in ILLEGAL ACTIVITES by colluding together to deny me justice.
So I am heartedly glad he's gone the bastard. I hope he and that other twerp Yates, rot in hell, but then both will still get their gold plated HUGE pensions etc and will now be able to live the life of Riley, so they will not mind one bit, I am sure!
THE DICTIONARY STATES:- CORRUPT...lacking in integrity, open to or involving in bribery or other dishonest practices, putrid or rotten....CORRUPTION, the act of corrupting or state of being corrupt...dishonesty. So those of you who probably think I use this word with gay abandon, think again! I think that my constant use of this word is entirely justified, as I use it in the context of describing the goings on of ALL the government departments that I have been forced to have to go to and then have to put up with their rotten acts of corrupt practices.
Certainly the Met are the most corrupt police force in the UK and always have been. However other forces are also corrupt too, like my local force the Dorset Shower. Not many people in Dorset have much good to say about them, either and you should read my link to the website called Dorset police.Then you will see some of the goings on they get up to. Same as the Met but on a smaller scale.
Wednesday, 13 July 2011
Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 63.
THE CORRUPT LIARS OF THE MET AND THE USELESS CIVIL SERVANTS OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONERS OFFICE, WHO LIKE THE IPCC SEEM ONLY TO BE IN EXISTENCE TO PROTECT THE POLICE AND THE IPO. SO THEY TOO ARE CORRUPT BECAUSE IT IS OBVIOUS THAT THEY ARE DOING THIS KNOWINGLY AND DELIBERATELY. THUS PROTECTING THE POLICE AND DENYING ME JUSTICE
How many of you have watched those wretched Met Coppers on TV blagging and lying their way through the MP's questioning them. What an utter shower they all are.
Now folks this is coming from the very same mob of bastards that HAMPERED MY TRYING TO GET JUSTICE AND MY ASKING THEM TO INVESTIGATE BUSBRIDGES FORGERY AND PERJURY!! Talk about HYPOCRITES and what did they do, but hamper my efforts and in collusion with the IPO. Is it any wonder I couldn't get them to act on irrefutable evidence when they just went and colluded with another bunch of civil servants?
THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONERS OFFICE.
A few posts back I told you about how the ICO to whom I had complained about the Met and the Dorset Police, the IPO and the Parliamentary Ombudsman, all hiding from me documents that they all sent each other when I had tried to get the Met to investigate Busbridge. It really only involved TWO documents that I definitely knew existed. One the email the IPO sent Sgt Brimicombe of Dorset Police and two, the advice the IPO gave Sgt Downs at Camden Station to HELP him refuse to investigate. He admits in an email which is on this blog, that they gave him this advice.
In both cases I believe that the IPO will have disseminated to both the DPS & the Met, lies about whether forgery and perjury had been committed. I am also sure that they will have thrown in a load of derogatory remarks about me on a personal level.
This ICO mob gave me their decision re the Dorset Police a few weeks ago and how they were a bunch of whiter than white darlings who had done absolutely no wrong. I wrote about that a few posts back. Today I got their decisions about my complaints that all had refused me under the FOIAct and the DPAct and I talk now about the IPO & the Met.
The ICO have deliberately misread my complaints about both parties and in both cases they have twisted the requests I gave them in such a way as to be able to say that what I had asked for, was not able to be given to me. Yet what they say I had asked for is not what I had asked for, as I in the course of writing to both the Met & the IPO had honed my request down to those two specific documents. Originally I had asked for any documents they had that concerned me and in the case of the IPO what they had said to the Met and in the Mets case what they had said to the IPO or had received off the IPO and I specifically mentioned this one document. (the advice that the IPO gave Sgt Downs.)
In the case of the IPO I was specific about the email that they admitted they would send to the DPS. Yet what they, the ICO have done is spoken to the IPO and obviously have been fed lies by them which is what they do all the time. They try to say I did not apply under the right Act when the fcat is that I applied for the same under BOTH Acts and they say that information I had asked for could be openly seen under the Trade Marks journals which are open to the Public. This is a complete lie as what I asked for had nothing to do with any of the 8 hearings, so would never be found on any files open to the public. This is how these bastards work, by lying all the time and giving the ICO excuses so they can find for their mates in another government department. They are all shagging each other these civil servant bastards and covering up for each other.
In the case of the Met I even had to pay £10 in order to get any info off them under the DPAct. Yet when do the ICO even mention this so it's as if I am being told I did not apply under the right Act.
In both requests to the IPO & the Met I had simply asked to see both these documents which would have had in them matters to do with my request to get the Met to investigate all the forgery and perjury Busbridge had committed. All my letters about this are on this blog, so you can see for yourself what I asked for. Then the ICO deliberately complicate matters by constantly switching their remarks from one Act to the other and back again. The fact that there are TWO Acts that basically deal with matters that I think are the same. Some idiot in Parliament who thought up these Acts (in order to fool the Public that you could actually make civil servants give up incriminating documents) has I think deliberately made matters in such a way that the powers can obfuscate in all sorts of ways and tie you up in knots over what Act are you asking under? That is why I asked the same questions under BOTH Acts and they still lie through their back teeth and refuse you those documents. The whole thing is yet another sham and con on the Public.
In my case they have deliberately refused to give me those documents and the ICO have backed them up and as it is obvious the ICO have talked to the IPO it is also obvious that the IPO have given them a pack of lies. You can see how the ICO have been indoctrinated by the IPO as on the beginning of their decision document on the IPO, they state on page 2, under 'BACKGROUND', in 3 paragraphs, remarks about subject matter that I did not give the ICO. This is because they detail that I had a long running dispute involving trade marks etc etc, which they can only have got from some IPO mouthpeice. None of that is any business of the ICO and has absolutely no bearing on what I had asked to be divulged, as you will see from what I had asked to see. This proves beyond doubt that the ICO have been heavily involved in discussions about me on a personal level and with departments that I am complaining about. ONCE MORE THE IPO HAVE INDOCTRINATED ANOTHER GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT THAT I HAVE GONE TO TO GET JUSTICE.....OTHERS INCLUDE THE DPS, THE MET, THE PARLIAMENTARY OMBUDSMAN AND SO ON.IT IS ALL A SHAM AND DISGRACEFUL and they are able to get away with it, time and again. They wouldn't if I were rich!
Their remark that I have been 'involved in a long running dispute' is said by them, to make me out as a litigious person. Yet who started all the legal actions?..ROBERT BUSBRIDGE, IN 2002 WHEN HE APPLIED TO REGISTER THE MARK THAT I OWNED AND AT THE SAME TIME APPLIED TO HAVE MY TRADE MARK MADE INVALID. ENOUGH SAID????
Now that is pretty well all the actions I could take to get Justice and they have run their course. I will next week get all the latest documents onto this blog and you can read for yourself what has gone on in my latest efforts to get Justice from a number of quarters. (The Attorney General and the ICO.) I will type out explanation remarks for each document that has been lately generated.
There will also be documents from my battle to get the Attorney General to get the Police to investigate Busbridges forgery and perjury. You will be able to see what that bastard is all about too. Another useless sickening ***** filling his pockets with Public money and refusing to help those who he is supposed to serve and by a litany of excuses and outright lies. Yet another civil servant covering up for his fellow tossers. You will see how devious he and his minion McGinty has lied as laid out in my recent post. How I am told over and over how he cannot involve himself, but tucked away I am told that if I can prove by evidence I send him, then he could take steps, yet when I do exactly that all I get is a continuation of excuses. It is all there in black and white if you care to read it all.
How many of you have watched those wretched Met Coppers on TV blagging and lying their way through the MP's questioning them. What an utter shower they all are.
Now folks this is coming from the very same mob of bastards that HAMPERED MY TRYING TO GET JUSTICE AND MY ASKING THEM TO INVESTIGATE BUSBRIDGES FORGERY AND PERJURY!! Talk about HYPOCRITES and what did they do, but hamper my efforts and in collusion with the IPO. Is it any wonder I couldn't get them to act on irrefutable evidence when they just went and colluded with another bunch of civil servants?
THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONERS OFFICE.
A few posts back I told you about how the ICO to whom I had complained about the Met and the Dorset Police, the IPO and the Parliamentary Ombudsman, all hiding from me documents that they all sent each other when I had tried to get the Met to investigate Busbridge. It really only involved TWO documents that I definitely knew existed. One the email the IPO sent Sgt Brimicombe of Dorset Police and two, the advice the IPO gave Sgt Downs at Camden Station to HELP him refuse to investigate. He admits in an email which is on this blog, that they gave him this advice.
In both cases I believe that the IPO will have disseminated to both the DPS & the Met, lies about whether forgery and perjury had been committed. I am also sure that they will have thrown in a load of derogatory remarks about me on a personal level.
This ICO mob gave me their decision re the Dorset Police a few weeks ago and how they were a bunch of whiter than white darlings who had done absolutely no wrong. I wrote about that a few posts back. Today I got their decisions about my complaints that all had refused me under the FOIAct and the DPAct and I talk now about the IPO & the Met.
The ICO have deliberately misread my complaints about both parties and in both cases they have twisted the requests I gave them in such a way as to be able to say that what I had asked for, was not able to be given to me. Yet what they say I had asked for is not what I had asked for, as I in the course of writing to both the Met & the IPO had honed my request down to those two specific documents. Originally I had asked for any documents they had that concerned me and in the case of the IPO what they had said to the Met and in the Mets case what they had said to the IPO or had received off the IPO and I specifically mentioned this one document. (the advice that the IPO gave Sgt Downs.)
In the case of the IPO I was specific about the email that they admitted they would send to the DPS. Yet what they, the ICO have done is spoken to the IPO and obviously have been fed lies by them which is what they do all the time. They try to say I did not apply under the right Act when the fcat is that I applied for the same under BOTH Acts and they say that information I had asked for could be openly seen under the Trade Marks journals which are open to the Public. This is a complete lie as what I asked for had nothing to do with any of the 8 hearings, so would never be found on any files open to the public. This is how these bastards work, by lying all the time and giving the ICO excuses so they can find for their mates in another government department. They are all shagging each other these civil servant bastards and covering up for each other.
In the case of the Met I even had to pay £10 in order to get any info off them under the DPAct. Yet when do the ICO even mention this so it's as if I am being told I did not apply under the right Act.
In both requests to the IPO & the Met I had simply asked to see both these documents which would have had in them matters to do with my request to get the Met to investigate all the forgery and perjury Busbridge had committed. All my letters about this are on this blog, so you can see for yourself what I asked for. Then the ICO deliberately complicate matters by constantly switching their remarks from one Act to the other and back again. The fact that there are TWO Acts that basically deal with matters that I think are the same. Some idiot in Parliament who thought up these Acts (in order to fool the Public that you could actually make civil servants give up incriminating documents) has I think deliberately made matters in such a way that the powers can obfuscate in all sorts of ways and tie you up in knots over what Act are you asking under? That is why I asked the same questions under BOTH Acts and they still lie through their back teeth and refuse you those documents. The whole thing is yet another sham and con on the Public.
In my case they have deliberately refused to give me those documents and the ICO have backed them up and as it is obvious the ICO have talked to the IPO it is also obvious that the IPO have given them a pack of lies. You can see how the ICO have been indoctrinated by the IPO as on the beginning of their decision document on the IPO, they state on page 2, under 'BACKGROUND', in 3 paragraphs, remarks about subject matter that I did not give the ICO. This is because they detail that I had a long running dispute involving trade marks etc etc, which they can only have got from some IPO mouthpeice. None of that is any business of the ICO and has absolutely no bearing on what I had asked to be divulged, as you will see from what I had asked to see. This proves beyond doubt that the ICO have been heavily involved in discussions about me on a personal level and with departments that I am complaining about. ONCE MORE THE IPO HAVE INDOCTRINATED ANOTHER GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT THAT I HAVE GONE TO TO GET JUSTICE.....OTHERS INCLUDE THE DPS, THE MET, THE PARLIAMENTARY OMBUDSMAN AND SO ON.IT IS ALL A SHAM AND DISGRACEFUL and they are able to get away with it, time and again. They wouldn't if I were rich!
Their remark that I have been 'involved in a long running dispute' is said by them, to make me out as a litigious person. Yet who started all the legal actions?..ROBERT BUSBRIDGE, IN 2002 WHEN HE APPLIED TO REGISTER THE MARK THAT I OWNED AND AT THE SAME TIME APPLIED TO HAVE MY TRADE MARK MADE INVALID. ENOUGH SAID????
Now that is pretty well all the actions I could take to get Justice and they have run their course. I will next week get all the latest documents onto this blog and you can read for yourself what has gone on in my latest efforts to get Justice from a number of quarters. (The Attorney General and the ICO.) I will type out explanation remarks for each document that has been lately generated.
There will also be documents from my battle to get the Attorney General to get the Police to investigate Busbridges forgery and perjury. You will be able to see what that bastard is all about too. Another useless sickening ***** filling his pockets with Public money and refusing to help those who he is supposed to serve and by a litany of excuses and outright lies. Yet another civil servant covering up for his fellow tossers. You will see how devious he and his minion McGinty has lied as laid out in my recent post. How I am told over and over how he cannot involve himself, but tucked away I am told that if I can prove by evidence I send him, then he could take steps, yet when I do exactly that all I get is a continuation of excuses. It is all there in black and white if you care to read it all.
Wednesday, 6 July 2011
Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 62.
NICK HERBERT THE POLICE MINISTER.
You will see on this blog that I have written a detailed book (Justice Denied) on the whole of this sordid story of IP theft by Robert Busbridge, how I was treated by endless corrupt and useless government civil servants who sided with this conman and who then stripped me of my IP and gave it to the crook Busbridge. How I then have tried to get Justice to absolutely no effect by the following entities:-
The IPO, The Police, the IPCC, the Justice Minister Ken Clarke, The Attorney General, plus
a host of MP's including my own useless tosser, Chope and so on-ad nauseam. I wrote this book 'Justice Denied' because as I am not rich I could not afford to go to law to try and get Justice. If I had been rich none of this would have happened anyway as I would have stopped it 20 years ago by using the best law brains in IP. I also decided the book should be sent to as many influencial people and bodies as possible, and I will be commentating in the next post on who I sent the book to and how it has been receiveda nd how successful I have or have not been.
For now this post is about one of those MP's one Nick Herbert the Minister for Police. I wanted him to be able to see what the organisation he should be responsible for have done to me. So off went the book with a covering letter. Today I got the book back with a covering letter which once again tells you how our governments think about the people who put them where they are and pays their overblown wages. How they really hold us in contempt, for what they do amounts to this and insults us further. My letter to Herbert and the reply I got from one of his faceless organ monkies will shortly go onto this blog, along with all the backlog that has built up of other documents of recent times, all from similar useless costly bodies of unctuous civil servants.
" The Minister receives so much correspondence that he is unable to reply personally to all those who write to him" So it starts straight away with a put down for this was no ordinary letter....IT WAS A LONG BOOK ON A VERY SERIOUS MATTER OF CORRUPTION WHICH INCLUDED THE VERY BODY HE IS SUPPOSED TO BE IN CONTROL OF!!WHICH OBVIOUSLY HAD TAKEN THE WRITER A LONG TIME TO WRITE AND HAVE PRINTED, AT NO SMALL COST. OBVIOUSLY ALL THAT HAS GONE OVER THE EMPTY HEAD OF THIS TOSSER, OR HE IS BEING THE USUAL CYNICAL SERVANT THEY ALL SEEM TO BE?
The writer then goes into a typical civil service, wafflespeak load of tripe, in which they make all sorts of excuses rather than give you a result. I will not repeat it all here, for it is all irrelevant trash. I say this for HE IS CALLED THE MINISTER FOR POLICE. Now what should that tell us?????? The writer, another McGinty character seems to think the Minister has no control over the Police at all, so what the hell is he for, I ask? This one goes by the handle of B.McGuire of no known gender and the letter is headed The Home Office.
The very same shower who sent me a letter some months back telling me that if the Police did not investigate it was tough shit mate! They are a force unto themselves AND NO ONE CAN CONTROL THEM!! I was to take my own legal action !!!!!!!!!
This is why we are forever being assailed, almost on a daily basis, of lurid stories about how the Police have failed one poor family after another. If it isn't useless coppers cocking up an important murder investigation, they are indulging in yet more corruptness, as in today's story about how more than 8 bastards stitched up 4 innocent men for murder and are now belatedly being done themselves. To messing up the Dowler investigation and to sitting on the facts about the NOTW phone hacking story, because they were all getting back handers. The very same old firm of the Met who colluded with the IPO to stop me getting justice!!
My point in this post is that this useless overpaid tosser Nick Herbert...what is he for and why is it that his Organ Grinder Monkies are deliberately keeping from him a story that HE SHOULD KNOW ABOUT? (they probably got straight onto the phone to their IPO mates to see what it was all about and were told to bury it)......DON'T THEY MAKE YOU SICK.
You will see on this blog that I have written a detailed book (Justice Denied) on the whole of this sordid story of IP theft by Robert Busbridge, how I was treated by endless corrupt and useless government civil servants who sided with this conman and who then stripped me of my IP and gave it to the crook Busbridge. How I then have tried to get Justice to absolutely no effect by the following entities:-
The IPO, The Police, the IPCC, the Justice Minister Ken Clarke, The Attorney General, plus
a host of MP's including my own useless tosser, Chope and so on-ad nauseam. I wrote this book 'Justice Denied' because as I am not rich I could not afford to go to law to try and get Justice. If I had been rich none of this would have happened anyway as I would have stopped it 20 years ago by using the best law brains in IP. I also decided the book should be sent to as many influencial people and bodies as possible, and I will be commentating in the next post on who I sent the book to and how it has been receiveda nd how successful I have or have not been.
For now this post is about one of those MP's one Nick Herbert the Minister for Police. I wanted him to be able to see what the organisation he should be responsible for have done to me. So off went the book with a covering letter. Today I got the book back with a covering letter which once again tells you how our governments think about the people who put them where they are and pays their overblown wages. How they really hold us in contempt, for what they do amounts to this and insults us further. My letter to Herbert and the reply I got from one of his faceless organ monkies will shortly go onto this blog, along with all the backlog that has built up of other documents of recent times, all from similar useless costly bodies of unctuous civil servants.
" The Minister receives so much correspondence that he is unable to reply personally to all those who write to him" So it starts straight away with a put down for this was no ordinary letter....IT WAS A LONG BOOK ON A VERY SERIOUS MATTER OF CORRUPTION WHICH INCLUDED THE VERY BODY HE IS SUPPOSED TO BE IN CONTROL OF!!WHICH OBVIOUSLY HAD TAKEN THE WRITER A LONG TIME TO WRITE AND HAVE PRINTED, AT NO SMALL COST. OBVIOUSLY ALL THAT HAS GONE OVER THE EMPTY HEAD OF THIS TOSSER, OR HE IS BEING THE USUAL CYNICAL SERVANT THEY ALL SEEM TO BE?
The writer then goes into a typical civil service, wafflespeak load of tripe, in which they make all sorts of excuses rather than give you a result. I will not repeat it all here, for it is all irrelevant trash. I say this for HE IS CALLED THE MINISTER FOR POLICE. Now what should that tell us?????? The writer, another McGinty character seems to think the Minister has no control over the Police at all, so what the hell is he for, I ask? This one goes by the handle of B.McGuire of no known gender and the letter is headed The Home Office.
The very same shower who sent me a letter some months back telling me that if the Police did not investigate it was tough shit mate! They are a force unto themselves AND NO ONE CAN CONTROL THEM!! I was to take my own legal action !!!!!!!!!
This is why we are forever being assailed, almost on a daily basis, of lurid stories about how the Police have failed one poor family after another. If it isn't useless coppers cocking up an important murder investigation, they are indulging in yet more corruptness, as in today's story about how more than 8 bastards stitched up 4 innocent men for murder and are now belatedly being done themselves. To messing up the Dowler investigation and to sitting on the facts about the NOTW phone hacking story, because they were all getting back handers. The very same old firm of the Met who colluded with the IPO to stop me getting justice!!
My point in this post is that this useless overpaid tosser Nick Herbert...what is he for and why is it that his Organ Grinder Monkies are deliberately keeping from him a story that HE SHOULD KNOW ABOUT? (they probably got straight onto the phone to their IPO mates to see what it was all about and were told to bury it)......DON'T THEY MAKE YOU SICK.
Tuesday, 5 July 2011
Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 61.
WHAT DID I SAY TO YOU ABOUT THE ICO?????
I have now got their decision letter about my complaint about the Dorset Police Service and them not handling my request for information under the FOIA and the DPA.
You will have to go back to my posts about all that and see the attached emails and letters from me to them and vice versa.
They behaved disgracefully in the way they handled my request and basically put two fingers up to me, which is the norm these days for the Police wherever. Even a complaint to their Chief and the IPCC as you will also know from previous posts-got me absolutely nowhere.
This latest exercise in utter futility has gone exactly the same way. With yet another government department/quangoe refusing to act and siding with their bretheren fellow civil servants. The writer said that "It is likely that the DPS has complied with the requirements of the DPA" Now I don't know about you, but that is definitely not an unequivical statement made, because the writer has evidence they did. It is a wishy washy statement that one could say that equally it is unlikely they didn't. It is obvious that the ICO did not receive from the Dorset Police Service any evidence that the DPS did 100% act within the requirements of the Data Protection Act, as I am sure if they had, they would have said so in a firmer statement. In other words we are giving the benefit of the doubt to the Police because that is how we work. We do not work on behalf of complainents (the Public that is) we work for our fellow civil servants.
All my evidence that I was treated like SHIT by this lying copper Shaun Waldbridge, by him failing to deal with my request in the laid down proper manner and within DPA/FOIA rules, was cast aside and ignored as usual.
Then this Kelly Steen who wrote this garbage, further shows us all just how corrupt even her department is, by saying that the DPS 'appeared likely that they have provided you with the information held about you at the time of your request. Now as this simply did not happen we have to take it that again the ICO has seen no evidence that they did, because again they can only manage another limp 'well it is LIKELY etc etc' IT SIMPLY IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH AND IT IS EXACTLY WHAT I EXPECTED OF THEM.
Then Miss Steen compounds her uselessness by going onto state 'They have confirmed that the emails had been deleted by the time of your request'. Now what this is referring to is the ONE email I knew the IPO had sent DS Brimicombe, in which the IPO would have well and truly slagged me off and warned the DPS what a wanker I was and a trouble maker and not to have anything to do with me, let alone show me the email that would damn them all.
NOW DO NOT FORGET THAT BOTH THE DPS AND THE IPO HAVE BOTH REFUSED TO DIVULGE THIS EMAIL, NO DOUBT A DAMNING EMAIL, WHICH WOULD HANG THEM ALL.....THE ABSOLUTE BASTARDS.
What you should know is that as soon as I had got hold of the email that told me that a further email would be forthcoming to the DPS from the IPO, I asked to see it. That would be within no more than a week or so of my getting from that DS Brimicombe, a copy of the first email from the IPO to DS Brimicombe, because he left the email in my dossier that I'd given him. So are we to believe that the Police routinely get rid of all incoming emails within days of receiving them?...pull the other one. So it is yet more Police lying and the ICO going along with it.
This duplicitous Steen woman then goes into a protection mode of making excuses about how long organisations are allowed to keep emails etc before they trash them. We have to believe going on this case and what is claimed to have happened to that email, that it is only for a few days, and I simply do not belive that.
So what this means is that all three of my other requests to the ICO re the withheld documents, withheld by the Parliamentary Ombudsman, the Met Police and the IPO themselves, will end up the exact same way this has. Each organisation will trot out excuses and the ICO will back them and defend them with a litany of lying excuses.
What makes me so mad with all the government bodies that we the Public are supposed to be able to use to obtain justice against the civil service trash departments that shaft us and lie to us and side with the very people we are complaining about, are all sitting there in their vast offices all paid for by the Public purse. They consume millions of pounds of our money doing absolutely nothing. Shuffling peices of paper around making it look like they are seriously taking up complaints. When all the time, all it is is window dressing, smoke and mirrors to fool us that indeed there are organistions that will help us when we get done over by lying, useless, duplicious civil servants!! What a cesspit of iniquity the Establishment of this country are. I have said it before and I will say it again. There is no democracy in this country, no freedoms and we really live in a country no better that any dictators country or any banana Replublic. Yet these POLITICIAQNS RANT AND RAVE AT THE ASSADS AND GADAFFI'S OF THIS WORLD WHEN THEY DO TO THEIR PUBLIC THE SAME AS WE REALLY DO TO OURS. The only difference is that here the trash Politicians do it in a much more sophisticated way. They do not bump people off or make them disappear, but they just block any attempts to use the systems we are told should give us JUSTICE. It all goes back to what I have said time and again....IN THIS ROTTEN COUNTRY YOU ONLY GET JUSTICE IF YOU CAN AFFORD IT!! EVEN THEN THEY CAN STILL BLOCK YOU IF THEY WANT, BY JUST MAKING SURE YOU WILL GET A JUDGE WHO IS IN THEIR PAY LIKE JUDGE HOBBS.....(Refer to my previous posts on him and how that bumbling oaf Clarke refused to investigate his corruption (despite the evidence) and the way he manipulated the appeal hearing he was supposed to hear, in collusion with the IPO, so as to block my getting justice and showing how corrupt and useless the IPO really are.)
I have now got their decision letter about my complaint about the Dorset Police Service and them not handling my request for information under the FOIA and the DPA.
You will have to go back to my posts about all that and see the attached emails and letters from me to them and vice versa.
They behaved disgracefully in the way they handled my request and basically put two fingers up to me, which is the norm these days for the Police wherever. Even a complaint to their Chief and the IPCC as you will also know from previous posts-got me absolutely nowhere.
This latest exercise in utter futility has gone exactly the same way. With yet another government department/quangoe refusing to act and siding with their bretheren fellow civil servants. The writer said that "It is likely that the DPS has complied with the requirements of the DPA" Now I don't know about you, but that is definitely not an unequivical statement made, because the writer has evidence they did. It is a wishy washy statement that one could say that equally it is unlikely they didn't. It is obvious that the ICO did not receive from the Dorset Police Service any evidence that the DPS did 100% act within the requirements of the Data Protection Act, as I am sure if they had, they would have said so in a firmer statement. In other words we are giving the benefit of the doubt to the Police because that is how we work. We do not work on behalf of complainents (the Public that is) we work for our fellow civil servants.
All my evidence that I was treated like SHIT by this lying copper Shaun Waldbridge, by him failing to deal with my request in the laid down proper manner and within DPA/FOIA rules, was cast aside and ignored as usual.
Then this Kelly Steen who wrote this garbage, further shows us all just how corrupt even her department is, by saying that the DPS 'appeared likely that they have provided you with the information held about you at the time of your request. Now as this simply did not happen we have to take it that again the ICO has seen no evidence that they did, because again they can only manage another limp 'well it is LIKELY etc etc' IT SIMPLY IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH AND IT IS EXACTLY WHAT I EXPECTED OF THEM.
Then Miss Steen compounds her uselessness by going onto state 'They have confirmed that the emails had been deleted by the time of your request'. Now what this is referring to is the ONE email I knew the IPO had sent DS Brimicombe, in which the IPO would have well and truly slagged me off and warned the DPS what a wanker I was and a trouble maker and not to have anything to do with me, let alone show me the email that would damn them all.
NOW DO NOT FORGET THAT BOTH THE DPS AND THE IPO HAVE BOTH REFUSED TO DIVULGE THIS EMAIL, NO DOUBT A DAMNING EMAIL, WHICH WOULD HANG THEM ALL.....THE ABSOLUTE BASTARDS.
What you should know is that as soon as I had got hold of the email that told me that a further email would be forthcoming to the DPS from the IPO, I asked to see it. That would be within no more than a week or so of my getting from that DS Brimicombe, a copy of the first email from the IPO to DS Brimicombe, because he left the email in my dossier that I'd given him. So are we to believe that the Police routinely get rid of all incoming emails within days of receiving them?...pull the other one. So it is yet more Police lying and the ICO going along with it.
This duplicitous Steen woman then goes into a protection mode of making excuses about how long organisations are allowed to keep emails etc before they trash them. We have to believe going on this case and what is claimed to have happened to that email, that it is only for a few days, and I simply do not belive that.
So what this means is that all three of my other requests to the ICO re the withheld documents, withheld by the Parliamentary Ombudsman, the Met Police and the IPO themselves, will end up the exact same way this has. Each organisation will trot out excuses and the ICO will back them and defend them with a litany of lying excuses.
What makes me so mad with all the government bodies that we the Public are supposed to be able to use to obtain justice against the civil service trash departments that shaft us and lie to us and side with the very people we are complaining about, are all sitting there in their vast offices all paid for by the Public purse. They consume millions of pounds of our money doing absolutely nothing. Shuffling peices of paper around making it look like they are seriously taking up complaints. When all the time, all it is is window dressing, smoke and mirrors to fool us that indeed there are organistions that will help us when we get done over by lying, useless, duplicious civil servants!! What a cesspit of iniquity the Establishment of this country are. I have said it before and I will say it again. There is no democracy in this country, no freedoms and we really live in a country no better that any dictators country or any banana Replublic. Yet these POLITICIAQNS RANT AND RAVE AT THE ASSADS AND GADAFFI'S OF THIS WORLD WHEN THEY DO TO THEIR PUBLIC THE SAME AS WE REALLY DO TO OURS. The only difference is that here the trash Politicians do it in a much more sophisticated way. They do not bump people off or make them disappear, but they just block any attempts to use the systems we are told should give us JUSTICE. It all goes back to what I have said time and again....IN THIS ROTTEN COUNTRY YOU ONLY GET JUSTICE IF YOU CAN AFFORD IT!! EVEN THEN THEY CAN STILL BLOCK YOU IF THEY WANT, BY JUST MAKING SURE YOU WILL GET A JUDGE WHO IS IN THEIR PAY LIKE JUDGE HOBBS.....(Refer to my previous posts on him and how that bumbling oaf Clarke refused to investigate his corruption (despite the evidence) and the way he manipulated the appeal hearing he was supposed to hear, in collusion with the IPO, so as to block my getting justice and showing how corrupt and useless the IPO really are.)
Sunday, 19 June 2011
Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 60.
I have talked recently about my efforts to get the Attorney General to force the Police or the CPS to get Busbridge investigated for all the forgery & Perjury he committed in 8 Tribunal Hearings and one County Court case, not to mention the same crimes he committed with getting the Police to charge me in 1999.
I told you about my sending the A/Gen a dossier bundle of evidence and what one of his minions, a McGinty and his goat, eventually replied in a short page and a half reply.
You always know that the civil servants have not even read any of what you have said in long letters and or as in this case a huge bundle of well over a 100 pages of documents of evidence etc, when all they can manage in reply is a terse one and a half pages of tripe.
As I told you it boiled down to this bum saying that the Att/Gen could not interfere in the fact that all the hearing officers, nor the trial Judge had asked that perjury be investigated or the forgery. Of course they didn't, the useless lazy bastards. In the case of the IPO hearing officers they, I believe by virtue of the evidence of their actions and subsequent actions and statements made by the IPO, they wanted me to lose. That is apart from one,-the Landau decision, but there the IPO deliberately ignored his pronouncement that Busbridge was to lose and they then went onto manipulating events so that his verdict could be ignored. So this McGinty uses this as the excuse that the Att/Gen cannot and will not do anything.
However this is a BIG LIE as the CPS in a document, which I copied to this McGinty Git say " absense of such a recommendation does not mean that there is no justification for an investigation" and this means that if the oaf of a hearing officer or a Judge doesn't see what is staring him in the face, and or takes no notice that he is being told by the person against whom perjury and forgery is being committed, that is is being committed, it means that the injured person should be able to ask the Att/Gen to look into the matter, for JUSTICE IS NOT BEING SERVED by the perjury and forgery being ignored. Remember what the Scottish prosecutor said about not allowing perjury to be ignored and the very good reasons for that. It seems in England the establishment do not adhere to the high standards they do in Scotland!!!!!!!!! But then I am but a mere peasant who does not matter, and Sheridan was a well known public figure....so there you have your answer.
In fact, he then goes on to say that if I got Busbridge to admit he had lied and here I must point out that in all my efforts to get justice EVERY civil servant I come across deliberately IGNORES the fact that FORGERY has been also committed and this is because forgery is easy to prove. At least it is in my cases, but no, they don't want TO KNOW about forgery so they ignore that and stick to the perjury where they can lie and make these excuses for not acting because as McGinty said "If the matter was brought to his attention by the trial Judge (here he in his ignorance, fails to see that Judges do not hold IPO hearings, but biased Hearing Officers who are IPO employees-do ) I am toldthat it is not enough for one party to claim that his opponent has lied, that is for the court to determine in the proceedings"
Of course they say this because they simply want to brush all this under the carpet. It leaves people like me in the hopeless situation where, because corrupt hearing officers or stupid lazy Judges either do not want to see what is happening in front of them, even when it is pointed out to them AND evidence has been put into the proceedings which show what is going on, it means you get your hands tied. It means that in every court case in upper courts or lower courts like tribunal hearings, all that happens is that people in them lie and lie and lie and they know they will get away with it BECAUSE THE SYSTEM DOES NOT WANT TO DEAL WITH LIES, AS IT IS ALL TOO MUCH FOR THE SYSTEM. IT IS EASIER TO IGNORE IT, WHICH IS WHAT IS HAPPENING TO ME. I have to suffer miscarriages of Justice and the trashing of my Human Rights under the H.R.Act that should be giving me the right to fair trials.
If I were a BLACKMAN or an ASIAN TRYING IT ON TO ENABLE ME TO STAY IN THIS COUNTRY, I WOULD BE TRAMPLED TO DEATH IN THE RUSH OF CORRUPT LAWYERS ON THE GRAVY TRAIN OF HUGE MONIES TO BE MADE, DEFENDING ALL THESE KINDS OF PEOPLE, WANTING TO TAKE ON MY CASE. Or if I were a criminal I would also be able to get a lawyer to help me win. In my case I cannot even get a Human Rights lawyer to answer an email of enquiry, let alone get them to take on the case. IT IS DISGUSTING.
IT IS ALSO DISGUSTING THAT THIS MCGINTY (AND HIS GOAT) SAYS I SHOULD GET BUSBRIDGE TO ADMIT HE LIED. IS THIS BLOODY MAN STUPID OR RUBBING IT IN TO SAY THAT, AS HE MUST KNOW THAT THIS IS THE LAST THING BUSBRIDGE WOULD DO? After being successful over 20 years of making over 200 seperate lies and forging 5 documents and he thinks he will suddenly cave in and admit to even only one lie. I WOULD LIKE TO PUKE ALL OVER THIS DEVIOUS BASTARD MCGINTY FOR WHAT HE HAS SAID TO ME, ALL IN ORDER TO SQUIRM OUT OF THE ATT/GEN DOING ANYTHING.
So there you have it, in the UK the mere ordinary bloke on the street once again gets trampled on by the Corrupt and useless Establishment who would rather see the peasants continue to suffer injustices. It saves them money and the hassle and they know we cannot resort to Law as we cannot afford the stupendous costs involved by taking on the bloodsucking lawyers, who let's face it are their friends. All of the same class. Went to the same Public schools and all that.
Lastly McGinty rubs it in by stating in his last paragraph that unless the Att/Gen has a trial Judge telling him that perjury was committed he will not act. My evidence isn't good enough. Of course the only trial Judge I ever had was the was the one in the 2000 trial at Dorchester and he saw piles of perjury AND forgery being committed and DID BUGGERALL. All the IPO Hearing Officers as I have said won't do anything as some will be dead and or retired and in any case all were employees of the IPO, so we can be sure they were not independent and on IPO orders. Read through the papers of the 1994 hearing before Reynolds and tell me that that old buffer wasn't under orders to trash all my good evidence. It was so obvious that it was a sick joke.
Now that the Att Gen saga is over as I have gone as far as I can, it is only the Information Commissioner who is left where I could get valuable evidence of collusion between the IPO and the Met Police and the DPS, but you can safely bet he will act just like all the other corrupt government bodies and it will be a whitewash. Just you see.
I told you about my sending the A/Gen a dossier bundle of evidence and what one of his minions, a McGinty and his goat, eventually replied in a short page and a half reply.
You always know that the civil servants have not even read any of what you have said in long letters and or as in this case a huge bundle of well over a 100 pages of documents of evidence etc, when all they can manage in reply is a terse one and a half pages of tripe.
As I told you it boiled down to this bum saying that the Att/Gen could not interfere in the fact that all the hearing officers, nor the trial Judge had asked that perjury be investigated or the forgery. Of course they didn't, the useless lazy bastards. In the case of the IPO hearing officers they, I believe by virtue of the evidence of their actions and subsequent actions and statements made by the IPO, they wanted me to lose. That is apart from one,-the Landau decision, but there the IPO deliberately ignored his pronouncement that Busbridge was to lose and they then went onto manipulating events so that his verdict could be ignored. So this McGinty uses this as the excuse that the Att/Gen cannot and will not do anything.
However this is a BIG LIE as the CPS in a document, which I copied to this McGinty Git say " absense of such a recommendation does not mean that there is no justification for an investigation" and this means that if the oaf of a hearing officer or a Judge doesn't see what is staring him in the face, and or takes no notice that he is being told by the person against whom perjury and forgery is being committed, that is is being committed, it means that the injured person should be able to ask the Att/Gen to look into the matter, for JUSTICE IS NOT BEING SERVED by the perjury and forgery being ignored. Remember what the Scottish prosecutor said about not allowing perjury to be ignored and the very good reasons for that. It seems in England the establishment do not adhere to the high standards they do in Scotland!!!!!!!!! But then I am but a mere peasant who does not matter, and Sheridan was a well known public figure....so there you have your answer.
In fact, he then goes on to say that if I got Busbridge to admit he had lied and here I must point out that in all my efforts to get justice EVERY civil servant I come across deliberately IGNORES the fact that FORGERY has been also committed and this is because forgery is easy to prove. At least it is in my cases, but no, they don't want TO KNOW about forgery so they ignore that and stick to the perjury where they can lie and make these excuses for not acting because as McGinty said "If the matter was brought to his attention by the trial Judge (here he in his ignorance, fails to see that Judges do not hold IPO hearings, but biased Hearing Officers who are IPO employees-do ) I am toldthat it is not enough for one party to claim that his opponent has lied, that is for the court to determine in the proceedings"
Of course they say this because they simply want to brush all this under the carpet. It leaves people like me in the hopeless situation where, because corrupt hearing officers or stupid lazy Judges either do not want to see what is happening in front of them, even when it is pointed out to them AND evidence has been put into the proceedings which show what is going on, it means you get your hands tied. It means that in every court case in upper courts or lower courts like tribunal hearings, all that happens is that people in them lie and lie and lie and they know they will get away with it BECAUSE THE SYSTEM DOES NOT WANT TO DEAL WITH LIES, AS IT IS ALL TOO MUCH FOR THE SYSTEM. IT IS EASIER TO IGNORE IT, WHICH IS WHAT IS HAPPENING TO ME. I have to suffer miscarriages of Justice and the trashing of my Human Rights under the H.R.Act that should be giving me the right to fair trials.
If I were a BLACKMAN or an ASIAN TRYING IT ON TO ENABLE ME TO STAY IN THIS COUNTRY, I WOULD BE TRAMPLED TO DEATH IN THE RUSH OF CORRUPT LAWYERS ON THE GRAVY TRAIN OF HUGE MONIES TO BE MADE, DEFENDING ALL THESE KINDS OF PEOPLE, WANTING TO TAKE ON MY CASE. Or if I were a criminal I would also be able to get a lawyer to help me win. In my case I cannot even get a Human Rights lawyer to answer an email of enquiry, let alone get them to take on the case. IT IS DISGUSTING.
IT IS ALSO DISGUSTING THAT THIS MCGINTY (AND HIS GOAT) SAYS I SHOULD GET BUSBRIDGE TO ADMIT HE LIED. IS THIS BLOODY MAN STUPID OR RUBBING IT IN TO SAY THAT, AS HE MUST KNOW THAT THIS IS THE LAST THING BUSBRIDGE WOULD DO? After being successful over 20 years of making over 200 seperate lies and forging 5 documents and he thinks he will suddenly cave in and admit to even only one lie. I WOULD LIKE TO PUKE ALL OVER THIS DEVIOUS BASTARD MCGINTY FOR WHAT HE HAS SAID TO ME, ALL IN ORDER TO SQUIRM OUT OF THE ATT/GEN DOING ANYTHING.
So there you have it, in the UK the mere ordinary bloke on the street once again gets trampled on by the Corrupt and useless Establishment who would rather see the peasants continue to suffer injustices. It saves them money and the hassle and they know we cannot resort to Law as we cannot afford the stupendous costs involved by taking on the bloodsucking lawyers, who let's face it are their friends. All of the same class. Went to the same Public schools and all that.
Lastly McGinty rubs it in by stating in his last paragraph that unless the Att/Gen has a trial Judge telling him that perjury was committed he will not act. My evidence isn't good enough. Of course the only trial Judge I ever had was the was the one in the 2000 trial at Dorchester and he saw piles of perjury AND forgery being committed and DID BUGGERALL. All the IPO Hearing Officers as I have said won't do anything as some will be dead and or retired and in any case all were employees of the IPO, so we can be sure they were not independent and on IPO orders. Read through the papers of the 1994 hearing before Reynolds and tell me that that old buffer wasn't under orders to trash all my good evidence. It was so obvious that it was a sick joke.
Now that the Att Gen saga is over as I have gone as far as I can, it is only the Information Commissioner who is left where I could get valuable evidence of collusion between the IPO and the Met Police and the DPS, but you can safely bet he will act just like all the other corrupt government bodies and it will be a whitewash. Just you see.
Friday, 10 June 2011
Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 59.
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
This guy and his office, as you will know, recently refused to order the Met Police to investigate the forgery and perjury committed by Busbridge at various court hearings and tribunal hearings over 20 years. Their vacuous and whitewashing excuses amount to nothing More than lies.
So here we have two points to consider. One in my case the IPCC behaved in a totally different way by refusing to ask the Met Police to investigate Busbridges forgery and perjury. ( On the lying excuse that I hadn't provided the Met with any proof despite my 3 inch thick dossier of evidence.
Of course I cannot ask my MP Poshboy Ellwood, to intervene as he is in on the cover up and refuses to act on my behalf.
So the A/General and his organ grinder monkey, this McGinty bloke, are lying (don't they all and all the time?) when he says the Att/Gen cannot investigate perjury that is committed in a Court. With my case where hearings had taken place, which were obviously miscarriages of justice and there was plenty of evidence of that because my human rights to fair trials/hearings had been trashed, he doesn't want to know as you have seen and that despite all the evidence I gave him.
Then very importantly and I asked the A/G about this: why was it that Busbridge was able to go the Met and allege I had committed ONE act of perjury and two acts of forgery at my hearing where I had opposed Chryslers application to register my Trade Mark and the Met swung into action straight away with an investigation through the Dorset Police? No excuses that forgery and perjury had to only be investigated on the word and request of the hearing Judge??? Double standards once again and why did the Attn/Gen ignore that question. I will tell you why....because it was too difficult to get round so he indulges via his Organ Grinder and his monkey, by ignoring it and telling porkies.
This shows how two faced he is and how he is willing to protect others in government and a consummate conman, rather than do the right thing. So he tells lies as to why he cannot investigate or ask the police to investigate, which he does all the time.
What a ******!!
This guy and his office, as you will know, recently refused to order the Met Police to investigate the forgery and perjury committed by Busbridge at various court hearings and tribunal hearings over 20 years. Their vacuous and whitewashing excuses amount to nothing More than lies.
So here we have two points to consider. One in my case the IPCC behaved in a totally different way by refusing to ask the Met Police to investigate Busbridges forgery and perjury. ( On the lying excuse that I hadn't provided the Met with any proof despite my 3 inch thick dossier of evidence.
Of course I cannot ask my MP Poshboy Ellwood, to intervene as he is in on the cover up and refuses to act on my behalf.
So the A/General and his organ grinder monkey, this McGinty bloke, are lying (don't they all and all the time?) when he says the Att/Gen cannot investigate perjury that is committed in a Court. With my case where hearings had taken place, which were obviously miscarriages of justice and there was plenty of evidence of that because my human rights to fair trials/hearings had been trashed, he doesn't want to know as you have seen and that despite all the evidence I gave him.
Then very importantly and I asked the A/G about this: why was it that Busbridge was able to go the Met and allege I had committed ONE act of perjury and two acts of forgery at my hearing where I had opposed Chryslers application to register my Trade Mark and the Met swung into action straight away with an investigation through the Dorset Police? No excuses that forgery and perjury had to only be investigated on the word and request of the hearing Judge??? Double standards once again and why did the Attn/Gen ignore that question. I will tell you why....because it was too difficult to get round so he indulges via his Organ Grinder and his monkey, by ignoring it and telling porkies.
This shows how two faced he is and how he is willing to protect others in government and a consummate conman, rather than do the right thing. So he tells lies as to why he cannot investigate or ask the police to investigate, which he does all the time.
What a ******!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)