Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 75.

HOW LAWYERS REFUSE TO HELP YOU:-

HODGE JONES and ALLEN, a solicitors firm who pose as protectors of the oppressed and boast in their adverts that "WE DO THINGS DIFFERENTLY TO FIGHT INJUSTICE AND DEFEND PEOPLE'S RIGHTS" that all sounds wonderful doesn't it??
Their advertising shows that they specialise in ambulance chasing 'Personal Injury' cases and also specialise in peoples 'Human Rights' (that means they specialise in getting 'illegals' into our country on 'Human Rights' nonsense AND on Legal Aid.
 Now whilst I despise such companies, beggars can't be choosy, seeing as this was the absolute last law firm I may stand a chance with getting them to take on this case. However their website did not make it clear if they did Public Law cases and so began my attempt to find out. Follow the copies of emails back and forth and you will see how I was at first buggered around as usual in even getting them to reply. When they eventually did after me pushing them and talking with this Marcia on the phone, they were suitably vague. Anyway follow the emails and you will see where I ended up......NOWHERE.

THIS IS WHAT WE THE PUBLIC WHO HAVE BEEN SHAT ON BY OUR GOVERNMENT, THEIR CIVIL SERVANTS, THE JUSTICE SYSTEM, JUDGES AND THE WHOLE SODDING LOT OF THEM, HAVE TO PUT UP WITH. TRYING TO GET JUSTICE, WHEN WE HAVE NO MONEY!!!!!!   NOTE THAT THIS COMPANY WAS BUT ONE OF WELL OVER A DOZEN FIRMS I APPROACHED AND GOT NOWHERE WITH ANY OF THEM!


I NOW HAVE TO MOVE ONTO MY NEXT STEP WHICH WILL TAKE SOME TIME TO GO THROUGH THE MOTIONS OF. THIS TIME I HOPE TO BE ABLE TO GET LEGAL ADVICE AS TO HOW TO PROCEED WITH THE CASE AND HOW I CAN GET LEGAL REPRESENTATION. I MAY THEN BE ABLE TO BE ALLOCATED  A LAWYER OR AT LEAST PUT ONTO ONE WHO ISN'T A SHYSTER AND EXCUSE MAKER??

THE FOLLOWING ARE COPIES OF WITE-UPS & ADVERTS WE RAN TO 2002. THEY SHOW HOW SUCCESSFUL MY COMPANY WAS IN SUCH A SHORT SPACE OF TIME. WE WERE APPEARING IN THE MAIN PRESS AS WELL AS VARIOUS CAR MAGAZINES AND
RUNNING MANY ADVERTS. WHAT I SHOW WILL BE ONLY A REPRESENTATION OF THE MANY THAT APPEARED AS THERE ARE TOO MANY TO SHOW ALL OF THEM.

THE OBJECT OF SHOWING THEM, IS TO SHOW YOU THE LEVEL THAT MY BUSINESS WAS, RIGHT UP TO 1991 AND THIS IS WHAT THE IPO/BUSBRIDGE MY LONDON AGENT BETWEEN THEM MANAGED TO TRASH. FROM 1991 ONWARDS, MY BUSINESS WAS AT A FRACTION THAT IT HAD BEEN DUE TO BUSBRIDGE ILLEGALLY USING MY TRADE MARK TO FOOL CUSTOMERS INTO BUYING COPIES OF MY VIPER CAR/KIT AND AIDED BY THE IPO AND THEIR ILLEGAL ACTIONS.

Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 74.

This post actually follows on from the previous one. Because for weeks now I have been thinking of my next steps to get JUSTICE. Previously I had approached various law firms asking if they could take on a case that would have dealt with the whole history of my IP battle from day one, back in 1992. Doing this on either Pro-Bono or on legal aid.

Predictably all those I approached threw their hands up in horror and said either they didn't do IP, which was just an excuse, as most of the unlawful acts were criminal!! Or they made up other excuses like; it's all to long and incredibly complicated. Like we only do simple cases as we are really all 'SIMPLE MINDED IDIOTS'

So over time I got to thinking that there was in anycase, ONE PIVOTAL POINT IN ALL THE HISTORY OF ALL THE HEARINGS ETC.  This was the phony alleged appeal hearing held by JUDGE HOBBS QC IN 2006. Remember that right up to that date I had won, because of what the hearing Officer Landau decreed and Busbridge was attempting to appeal that. Prove that Hobbs and James of the IPO were acting corruptly and "Perverting the Course of Justice" in what they did. For don't forget the ADVICE they gave Busbridge was carried out to the letter and he was HELPED by the IPO and that had the eventual effect, after they'd successfully swung two more hearings, Busbridges way. Then, to them being able in 2010 to illegally take off me, what they had given me after I proved my legal right to the Trade Mark 'Viper' .....You couldn't make it up as they say. Then if I could do that, all that went before or after was immaterial....if you understand. So I had only to prove ONE section of my long fight.

So now I determined that what I should do is find a law firm that isn't corrupt and in the pockets of the Justice System (IS THAT POSSIBLE YOU MAY THINK?) So my time for the past few weeks has been to root out a law firm that will do what I now know is called a PUBLIC LAW case and do it on legal aid. Now what I found in one area will not surprise you:- Many of the law firms that do do Public law are involved in 'Immigrants' and their fights to get to stay here, even when they are patently illegal immigrants or even terrorists. I see there are plenty of law firms falling over themselves to represent them, but not a white Anglo-Saxon Brit like ME! Thought about blacking up and calling myself Mohammed, but then they would throw me in prison for being RACIST !!!!! One such law firm had 76 lawyers on their books of which 60 odd were not Anglo Saxons. What do you think about that? They were not the only such law firm either, who knocked me back, but which  I could see were heavily involved in Public Law cases, over trying to protect their immigrant  customers. Also no problem for them to get huge amounts of Public Money (Legal Aid) for these cases, but not for mine.

Two problems here....One is few law firms do Public cases, as it means going up against Public bodies like government departments, like the IPO and the Police, who have deep tax payers pockets with unlimited money, to fight against anyone who wishes to expose the bastards!! Also they have to be real smart. Then as this case will involve fighting the Justice Ministry and they are the bosses, in essence of all law firms....are they not?????? So how many law firms will want to take them on....you ask? Very good question, but I have been trying anyway.

That involves me first of, all searching the internet for these firms, then sending endless emails asking if they do Public Law and on Legal Aid. I vary the content of my emails from just a few sentences, not mentioning the subject matter, to a brief description that it involves taking on what a Judge did that was illegal. No matter what I say, so far the reactions have been:-
A. Ignore my email completely....so no answer.
B. Deny they do Public Law, or that type of Public Law????
C. State they will not do Legal Aid.
E. Many saying they are TOO BUSY!!But I suspect scared witless because a JUDGE is involved!!

Not replying at all, is in my opinion the height of pure ignorance and bad manners. You would think that people involved in law would be people well educated and from good backgrounds, who should know how to behave decently. After all the LAW is there to GUIDE people in how to behave, not only lawfully but properly and treat others with dignity. Unfortunately in this world now, far too many have no standards or know how to behave decently. I GET REALLY SHAT OFF WITH ALL THESE PEOPLE AND LAW FIRMS, AS THEY ARE ALL SPINELESS HORRORS.

But I have not only written to law firms, as I've hunted out several investigative journalists, bloggers and writers to do with criminal and such like cases. Plus investigative TV programmes like Dispatches and to a few Editors of so called TOP NEWSPAPERS, like the Times and Telegraph and Sunday Times. NOT ONE OF ALL THOSE PEOPLE HAVE EVEN ACKNOWLEDGED RECEIPT OF MY LETTER/EMAIL.....WHAT A SHOWER-THE LOT OF THEM. It shows you how people who have really been shat on by the State like the Hillsborough people and now Grenfell plus this latest scandal of the tainted blood and there are countless others too. All have had to battle for decades and all have been ignored and shat on some more. This is what it is like when you have to fight the British Establishment and I hate the lot of them, as I suspect others do too.



I will post up when all my efforts to find a law firm are exhausted, on where if anywhere I get. I will also post a list of all the law firms etc,who behaved like dogs.

 TO MAKE THIS BLOG MORE INTERESTING I AM NOW GOING TO INCLUDE PICTURES AND COPIES OF ARTICLES RELEVANT TO MY CAR MANUFACTURING BUSINESS THAT THE ESTABLISHMENT IN THE FORM OF THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE, SOUGHT TO DESTROY, AIDED AND ABETTED BY THE DORSET POLICE AND THE JUSTICE MINISTRY. THESE WILL SHOW JUST HOW DEEP INTO USING MY TRADE MARK I WAS AND HOW FAR BACK IT  ALL WENT......ALL LONG BEFORE BUSBRIDGE APPEARED & BEFORE HE PUT IN HIS APPLICATION TO REGISTER MY T/M.

THIS FIRST ARTICLE APPEARED IN MY LOCAL BOURNEMOUTH ECHO PAPER, IN FEBRUARY 1986, NOT LONG AFTER I HAD COMPLETED MY FIRST CAR A COBRA REPLICA. WHICH I THEN NAMED 'VIPER' AND THAT NAME WAS WHAT MY EX AGENT AND CRIMINAL, SOUGHT TO STEAL FROM TO ME, TO SELL TO CHRYSLER FOR HALF A MILLION IN 1992. THUS STARTING THIS SORRY SAGA OF GREED, HUMONGOUS LYING AND CORRUPTION.

ON EACH POST FROM NOW ON I WILL POST FURTHER PICS AND ARTICLES TO CHRONICLE THE RAPID GROWTH OF MY BUSINESS AND POPULARITY OF THE 'VIPER'.
THUS THIS BLOG WILL APPEAL TO READERS WHO LIKE CARS. I WILL ALSO INCLUDE PICS OF OTHER CARS I DESIGNED AND MADE, TO SHOW THAT THE BUSINESS THEY WRECKED WAS NOT A ONE CAR BUSINESS AND AT ITS HEIGHT BEFORE 1992 IT EMPLOYED 25 PEOPLE AND WAS ON TRACK TO TURN OVER A £MILLION AND THAT IN 1989/1990.....ALL EVENTUALLY AND SLOWLY WRECKED BY THE IPO AIDED AND ABETTED BY THE DORSET POLICE. I WILL COMMENT ON THE RELEVANCE OF EACH ARTICLE/PICTURE.

                                                     SO KEEP READING.

                                THE RELEVANCE OF THIS PICTURE/ARTICLE:-

I got my local MP, a twerp by the name of Atkinson, to try and give this article on my new business,
some good exposure and kudos. Alas all this man was interested in, was his own kudos and Brownie points and was obliging, so he could once more get his mug in the paper and pose as if the was actually interested in local business. He later on quickly showed his true colours as you will soon see. That was the start of my intense dislike of MP's and our so called ruling classes.

BELOW:-

ONE OF THE FIRST ARTICLES THAT APPEARED IN THE KITCAR PRESS ABOUT ONE OF MY EARLY BUILDS-A CAR WE MADE FOR A ROVER DEALER IN HIGH WYCOMBE. WE SHOWED IT AT A TRACK DAY AT CASTLE COOMBE AND IT WAS WELL RECEIVED.

A DAILY MAIL ARTICLE IN 1987 SHOWS WE WERE EVEN BEING NOTICED BY THE NATIONAL PRESS ESPECIALLY AS WE WERE SHOWING AT THE LONDON MOTOR SHOW

Corrupt Police & IPO-how they aided a crook. 73.

IPO = Intellectual Property Office.

This is the thoroughly corrupt mob of unmitigated bastards, who prompted me to start this blog way back in 2008. In 2010 after they helped a criminal steal my Intellectual Property off me, in the form of my Trade Mark applied to a sportscar I manufactured and thus ended that business. I went to the equally corrupt Dorset Police to try to get them to investigate the massive amount of perjury that the IPO refused to deal with. All perpetrated by the crook called BUSBRIDGE.

I knew that the DORSET POLICE had spoken at length to the IPO and also sent and received emails about me. I saw one of them, when the thick cop mistakenly sent me a copy. So under the Freedom of Information Act, I requested all copies of all letter and emails that went betwen the two of them. Plus details of phone calls. As is usual with ALL our corrupt institutions they only sent me a couple; one of which was the one already sent me by mistake by plod.

Now today I was looking through my records and came across those they disclosed and you should  think on them, for they show the mindset of not only the IPO, but of course our wonderful Dorset Police. It also show just what I was up against during ALL my dealings, not only with the IPO but then the Dorset Police. I shows just how corrupt all these bastards are and how it is impossible to get justice against them.

First I got a copy of what they call a 'File Note' and this raises the question of:- My dealings with the IPO started in 2002 after Chrysler threw the towel in, after I'd won against their trying to steal my Trade Mark 'Viper'. That meant the IPO now had to give me registration of that. Before that, ALL contact with the IPO was through firstly my Patent Agent and then a lawyer AND NOT ME!!. So direct contact started in 2002 when the IPO, minutes after giving me registration told me they were allowing Busbridge my crook ex agent, who tried to sell MY TRADE MARK to Chrysler for £1/2M saying he owned it !!!! and now the bastard was trying it on through the IPO. Obviously I was very annoyed with the IPO for they knew full well who he was and that he had no legal ownership of that T/M, as he'd been a witness for Chrysler and his involvement with me and the T/M was given in my evidence. Yet here they were allowing him to oppose my recent registration!! WHAT WAS GOING ON ??

After I got his statement of facts, as to why he thought he and not me had ownership of this T/M. I was predictably 'MAD AS HELL' as it was full of lies and forged documents that they had allowed into evidence knowing, given the past history and evidence at the Chrysler hearing, full well it was all lies and not backed up with REAL LEGAL evidence. So on that score I rang the IPO to complain and this is what some jumped up clerk noted about my call:-

Headed "Copy of a filenote Jan 04"........"There is a great deal of history between X (Busbridge my ex agent and a crook).....MR COOK CAN BE VERY DIFFICULT" !!!!! Just get that will you!!!!.If you stand up for your rights against ANY government department civil service shite, you are immediately classed as 'DIFFICULT'. No you should shut-up and say nothing.
For a start how did the IPO know anything about any dealings I'd had between myself and Busbridge before that note was written??????? I had had no direct dealings with Busbridge from 1992 to 2004 over this case as all dealings were through my Patent Agent or a lawyer and they were not endless, so why say 'a great deal'? One wonders if they had dealings with Busbridge behind my back and had listened to all he had to say about me and no doubt slagging me off, or of course, did Chrysler have things to tell them and to try and influence them against me? I would not put that past them.
As the only dealings to then, that the IPO had with me, is when in 2002 I dealt with their CEO a woman called Brimilowe, when I made a formal complaint that they were allowing Busbridge to oppose me, given what I've noted above. All within my rights to do so. Yet here we see that already the IPO was viewing me in a very negative and personal way. They are supposed to be scrupulously independent

I was also given another ' file note' this time dated July 2010 and that was after the IPO has successfully stuck the boot well into me, by taking my Trade Mark off me and don't forget what was said when they did that. For the hearing officer at that time said this :- "It will be as if Mr Cook had NEVER ever been given registration !" and that tells you EXACTLY what the IPO thought of me and how they had manipulated events from 2004 onwards, as recorded in this blog and to get to the position that they could kick me in the teeth and take what I'd previously and legally proved I owned. So you have to read these comments in the light of all that.

For now, they in an email to the Dorset Police who had contacted them (and why did they do that?) when I asked them to investigate all that perjury that the IPO had refused to ever investigate. So they go running to the IPO and they all get together to facilitate the demolition of myself. So they said:-
" Please see the attached document below as requested" (one has to ask why did the DPA ask for my blog details and who told them about it.....the IPO of course and WHY?)," a link to Mr Cook's blog. Some of the entries I found extremely shocking and offensive, so be aware if you do read it" !!!!!!!!!! Incredible!!!!!!

Now all that just shows you how the corrupt DPA and the IPO worked together to demolish me and my rights.....how corrupt is that?? First of all just how did the IPO even know I wrote a blog which up to then was entirely on how they had behaved corruptly and had forced me to go to the police. All is there for one to read if you wish so read all entries before July 2010 and ask yourself....'is any of this shocking and offensive'???? Obviously the IPO are sticking the boot in and intent on making me out to be a MONSTER, because I attacked them and of course in typical civil service attitudes, we have no right to defend our rights and positions!!

What are the IPO were doing here and only God knows what they discussed with the DPA in telephone calls between them? But it is very clear that as I say, they were intent to get the Police not to investigate, by slagging me off and it worked. For the Police TOLD ME THAT THEY WERE AWARE OF MY BLOG AND WHAT WAS IN IT, AS IF I'D BROKEN THE LAW. THAT SAID TO TELL ME THEY THOUGHT I WAS NOT WORTHY OF GETTING AN INVESTIGATION AND INDEED THEY TOLD ME THAT THE IPO HAD SAID THAT PERJURY HADN'T BEEN COMMITTED AND IN ANY CASE IT WAS A 'CIVIL MATTER'.WHICH IS A GROSS LIE!! Thus the Police after slagging me off in a very aggressive manner, refused to investigate......all documented in this blog.

But what I am trying to get over to you after having re-seen these filenotes and comments, is just how corrupt the IPO and Dorset Police of course are and that they stopped at nothing to take my legally owned trade mark off me (that I'd had to prove TO THEM, that I did legally have rights to it, that back in 1996), knowing full well I could not fight back by taking it to the High Court and get the Police to arrest Busbridge for CRIMINAL OFFENSES.

The Dorset Police and the MET Police who also spoke to the IPO over all this, with the same results for me. But worse still, is that I knew full well that there were masses of documents to do with me that they never gave up and they say that they were entitled not to give up certain documents so you wonder what was in those? Many would hold personal comments about me that if I'd seen them could have proved beyond doubt that the IPO were behaving corruptly and were determined that for some reason, they did not want me to ever own that Trade Mark. I have my thoughts as to why that is but will I ever be able WITHOUT THE HELP OF OTHERS, TO GET INTO THEIR RECORDS ON ME AND THIS CASE, AS THEY HAVE THWARTED ALL MY EFFORTS TO DO THIS LEGALLY, AND WITH IMPUNITY.  My efforts to complain about this to the ICO got nowhere as all Ombudsmen are a CON ON THE BRITISH PUBLIC....and that has been the subject of newspaper articles on this corrupt and expensive mob....the ICO.
___________________________________________________________________________________



Now being rich Chrysler used the biggest IP Law firm to represent them, that was around in London. The IP World is a small one and all the big IP lawyers know each other well, as do all those in the IPO. Do you seriously think that the big lawyers representing them, had nothing to say to the high up managers in the IPO law section??? They probably all belonged to the same posh clubs, went to the same Public schools and played golf in the same clubs. That is how the ESTABLISHMENT works all the time. I firmly believe that it was a set up from the beginning, but somehow the Hearing Officer at that hearing when I won against Chrysler, either forgot his script lines and how he was expected to find the case or was an 'honest Joe'. Think I'm dreaming.....then open up the transcript of the Hobbs QC hearing and go to the comments he made about that hearing on pages 33 line 25 and 34 line 1-7.........."I have looked at, as you know, the Registry record. You can get them off the internet with all the case details, the case history.....the long sordid history" Busbridge replies, "I have a couple of those"
Hobbs..."Only a couple, I have the history at the same time relating to Chrysler on a mark (trade) and this looks like a complete and utter mess to me"  
Now reflect on all that for what Hobbs is saying- he has looked at the 'history' and what he is in fact saying is that he has looked at all the papers and decisions made, when I opposed Chysler and won, then when Busbdridge opposed my registration which he corruptly won, but I forced the IPO to look at the legality of some his evidence and another hearing heard all that and by a Hearing Officer; Landau, which  I won. This phony appeal hearing Hobbs was supposed to be hearing, was against the Landau decision.
He is saying that it was all 'a mess and sordid' and it is clear that he thinks that my involvement was 'sordid and a mess' (or maybe he thinks the decision by the HO in 1996 -Chrysler which I won, and the Landau decision which I won was also 'sordid and a mess') It is therefore clear that something here is going on that is very corrupt and ILLEGAL!!

One has to wonder why Hobbs said all that, but I am convinced he had been got at by the IPO and it was all worked out between the IPO and this well known IP lawyer/Judge QC. This phoney appeal hearing was not 'bona-fide', as Busbridge gave no legal grounds to even get an appeal. The IPO needed to act in a way that turned round the Landau decision and how to do this? By setting up a phony appeal hearing where they could give Busbridge all the advice he needed to carry out actions that would allow the IPO to turn it all around. That would then appear to be all kosher. That is exactly what happened and if you read this blog (or the attached book 'Justice denied') in the relevant areas, you will see how Busbridge carried out all the advice that he was given and I eventually ended up in 2010, stripped of my T/M

One should also remind yourself that Hobbs was the biggest I/P Appeal Judge, hearing IPO appeals and cases, where an alleged 'independent appeal officer' would officiate. If you research his case history, he has heard more such cases and big ones than any one, which makes him a person the IPO would be intimately connected to and this phony appeal hearing shows this when you read the way he and James of the IPO talked to each other. Like a pair of close ex school buddies, they were practically having sex with each other!!!!  

Of course all my protestations at what had gone on and my official complaints, were ignored and got nowhere. As my complaints made through the Justice Ministry were swotted down by lies about how any decision made by a Judge could not be altered or complained about. That's a lie for a start as appeals against stupid Judges happen all the time, but here NO DECISION WAS EVER GIVEN AS THE PHONY APPEAL WAS 'DROPPED' BY BUSBRIDGE on Hobbs advice and all he had to do was carry out all the 'advice he'd been given by Hobbs and James helped him do all that, with all the results that can be seen in this blog....BRITISH JUSTICE AT WORK HERE!!!!The justice Ministry when that was pointed out ignored me.



 
   

Corrupt Police & IPO-how they aided a crook. 72.

On a post I made back on the 19th April I told how I had sent a letter to Liz Truss the Justice Minister, where I told her how a Judge had trashed my business and life and how I had found it absolutely impossible to get justice through any avenue, including all the complaint procedures within the justice system. How I had been stonewalled at every turn by the Establishment Johnnies who are not interested in real justice, only protecting their fellow cronies.

JUSTICE MINISTER>

Well yesterday I got a reply, but predictably not from her. So some obnoxious civil servant must have way-laid my letter so she never saw it and had not read it properly, as they never do and then thought that some other government department should be given it so as to bury it in someway. So this letter of reply was from the HM Courts & Tribunals, Customer Investigation Section. Don't they make you seeth these modern twerps that infest all of our PC Plonker government departments. They treat you as if they were a BUSINESS and you are a 'CUSTOMER' and as if you had willingly gone to them to get 'SERVICE' of some sort or to buy something.

It was the predictable short reply they always send you, full of lying excuses as to how they can 'Do nothing' then they trot out one lie after another. They have obviously not read your letter and understood what you were saying or more like it, they have deliberately 'misread' it and that has given them the right to then think up lies to excuse them doing nothing. Every avenue I'd already been down previously had used this absolute lie of an excuse:- "the judiciary are constitutionally independent of government and they must be able to make their decisions without interference"
So what this means is any judge can behave in whatever way they want INCLUDING ACTING IN AN UNLAWFUL WAY....BREAKING THE LAWS THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO UPHOLD!!! and they get off Scott free, as they are 'untouchable'. That is obvious BOLLOCKS for they can be charged when they break the law. Very few do for the same reasons I am coming up against. No politician is willing to stand up to them as is no one in the Police or even our rotten Press.

The letter went on:- "It is therefore not possible for a government Minister to comment on or intervene in matters that have been the subject of judicial consideration" Now you can see how slippery they are and how they use this excuse over and over again -TOTALLY IGNORING WHAT I TOLD THEM IN MY LETTER !! The hearing that Judge Hobbs officiated in was an appeal hearing or was supposed to be. Yet no matters to do with any appeal and what the appellant had given that gave him the right to appeal, and its legal merits etc, were ever discussed. Nor was there ANY DECISION EVERMADE!!!! As the appellant had never raised ANY LEGAL REASONS as to how he could even have an appeal which should have been in the statement he gave when asking for an appeal, which he was legally obliged to do, nothing like that was gone into. As I told them the transcript shows clearly that all that the alleged hearing covered, was this judge giving the appellant a bucket load of ADVICE ON HOW HE COULD CIRCUMVENT THE DECISION GIVEN AGAINST HIM THAT HE WAS SUPPOSED TO BE APPEALING. THIS IS ILLEGAL AND CONSTITUTED AN ACT OF PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE. 
SEE ON THE RIGHT OF THIS PAGE WHERE YOU CAN DOWNLOAD THE TRANSCRIPT AND READ IT YOURSELF.

Of course no one has the guts to want to agree on what actually did happen and to stand up against the 'Judicial Mafia'. Including NEWPAPERS!! This woman writer, a Miss Charlotte Green, whoever she is, went on to say that she had tried to trace my case or find what appeal routes I had taken. This just shows you what THICKO'S I am dealing with. For the case was never heard in front of a 'normal' Court but at a Tribunal Hearing under the auspices of the 'TREASURY SOLICITORS' and what's more, as I plainly told Lizz Truss I was not the person who applied to have an appeal hearing, as it was my enemy and ex agent who stole my Trade Mark and business and they denied me access or any say in that hearing!! So it was obvious she would never be able to trace anything through the normal courts records.

She then cheekily advises me to go to the Citizens Advice, who I approached some time ago and predictably it was so far out of their depths it was a farce, as I knew it would be. No solicitor will touch it, you cannot get Legal Aid and in any case hardly any lawyers do Legal Aid these days except for protecting illegal immigrants and terrorists who want to stay in this country, so they can blow up our kids. It all makes me sick as there are lawyers falling over themselves to do that, but protect a Brit from corrupt lawyers and Judges....NO WAY SO GO AWAY!!

Another lying excuse she kept making was "If I wanted to appeal the 'decision' as I was unhappy with the 'decision' etc" When I specifically said in my letter to Truss that NO APPEAL HEARING TOOK  PLACE AND SO NO 'DECISION' WAS EVER MADE AS THE APPELLANT DROPPED HIS APPEAL!!!!!!!! AND THAT AFTER HE'D GOT THE ADVICE TO DO, SO THEN FOLLOW THEIR INSTRUCTIONS AND THEN HIS LIFE WOULD SUDDENLY TURN INTO LIGHT AND ROSES AND HE COULD THEN GO ON AND FINISH OFF HIS ATTEMPTS TO STEAL MY TRADE MARK AND FINISH OFF MY BUSINESS!!!! HOW CORRUPT AND UNLAWFUL IS ALL THAT AND THE DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE IS ALL THERE FOR ALL TO SEE AND SHOWS THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED.

So you have to either think she was as thick as two short planks and could not grasp what I had said.....or more likely she was being her usual civil service devious lying, and twisting what I had said and that meant she could invent lying excuses to do nothing. I HAD HIGHLIGHTED IN CAPITALS THAT NO DECISION HAD EVER BEEN MADE ETC ETC.  Of course this election has stuffed up me being able to go back to the Justice Minister right now and will it even be Miss Truss??  So more time wasted. But as you can see I am a VERY perservering person who will keep going on.

HERE ARE COPIES  OF THOSE THREE LETTERS BETWEEN ME AND LIZ TRUSS MP, THE REPLY FROM MISS GREEN AND MY REPLY TO HER GIVING HER 'WHAT (Is this rubbish you sent me?  )

READING THEM YOU WILL SEE AND GRASP ALL THAT THIS IS ABOUT......HOW THE POLITICIANS, THEIR DEVIOUS PROTECTING CIVIL SERVANTS AND A*******s IN THE SO CALLED JUSTICE SYSTEM, BEHAVE WITH LIES, IN ORDER TO STUFF YOU ABOUT AND DENY YOU ANY SORT OF CLOSURE AND 'JUSTICE' ETC.

Corrupt Police & IPO-how they aided a crook. 71.

Throughout this blog I have recounted and just recently too, about the corrupt Judge Hobbs QC and how he behaved and that ruined my life too and how it was impossible for me to get justice against the ramifications of what he did. How I have tried to get newspapers into this story with no luck. Same again trying to find a lawyer to take out a prosecution on a no win no fee basis. Absoluely no one wanted to touch it  and all lied via various excuses etc.

 Just a few days ago it was reported that the Justice Secretary, Liz Truss, who had made it clear she does not like Judges much either and this especially so after the way they behaved over the Brexit issue when they showed their obvious bias with those two big hearings. Brought about by, I must say, a non Anglo Saxon Brit who made it her job to tell us real Brits how to run our country and get this; by using money she had made by us allowing her to make her good living here. How is that for a kick in our teeth?? (All the Judges denied they were biased even in the face, that the majority were known to be pro EU) Truss made an observation which got up the nose of their head Judge, a Judge Neuberger and he had his pennyworth about what he thought about her and her comments. Cheeky sod as he isn't elected and she is and she is free to say what she wants!! These Judge BASTARDS now think they really rule this country and not our elected Parliament as they are ALWAYS telling Parliament to change the laws they have made as they are unlawful etc and have overturned legal decisions made in courts. This especially to do with immigration matters. No coincidence there when their top Judge is of immigrant stock and so many are, in our justice system these days.  No BIAS THERE THEN !!??

Anyway this has shown me that she has an opinion that may help me. So I have just written to her briefly outlining what Judge Hobbs did to me in direct contravention of the law. How I have irrefutable evidence of that in the transcript of that hearing and how I have found trying to get justice about that, has shown me that there is AN IRON CURTAIN AROUND OUR JUDGES THAT MEANS YOU WILL NEVER EVER GET JUSTICE AGAINST ANY OF THEM. I asked her what she had to say about that. ESPECIALLY AS HER POLITICAL CLASSES ARE ALWAYS TELLING US PEASANTS HOW LUCKY WE ARE TO LIVE IN A DEMOCRACY AND UNDER THE RULE OF LAW...WHAT UTTER BULLSHIT AS THIS SHOWS.  Now the thing is, going on past experiences I doubt if I will EVER GET AN ANSWER, LET ALONE ANY HELP. PLACE YOUR BETS NOW! I will report on what if anything happens.

Corrupt Police & IPO-how they aided a crook. 70.

For those who haven't read all of this blog, IPO stands for Intellectual Property Office, which is a thoroughly corrupt British government department that robbed me of my Intellectual Property. It was what they did over a 10 year period that prompted me to start this blog. Their last act of sheer corruptness ended in 2010. All their corrupt acts over that 10 year period are listed in this blog and in the book I wrote about it all, which can be downloaded off this page.

So why do I bring this up again. Well over this holiday period I had much time on my hands, so decided to sort out all my boxes of files to do with those unsavoury 10 years. Get rid of files that no longer needed to be kept and sort out all the IPO files in date order etc. Of course I re-read some of them whilst doing this and it reminded me of just how ILLEGAL all those acts were and how the bastards got away with it.

In 2004 the first of SIX CORRUPT and ILLEGAL acts were committed. This was a hearing that my ex car agent brought about to make my legally gained Trade Mark registration of 'Viper' invalid. The Hearing Officer Reynolds ( a Judge or equivalent of) who works for the IPO and hears the arguments for and against, was so biased for my ex agent, it was untrue. It was very blatant and he decreed that my ex agent should also have registration of MY MARK. This despite not being shown any evidence that he had used that name BEFORE I had. I was accused of abandoning it even though I provided heaps of evidence that I had not and had continued without any break....all of course ignored by Reynolds. In fact my ex agent only ever used it  to describe or advertise MY PRODUCT as you would expect as my agent and then that started some two years after I had started my business and had begun using my mark. After being an agent for 3.5 years he then decided to steal it so he could say to Chrysler that he would sell it to them.  He had hoped to get £1/2M off them for it. He was thwarted by my fighting him for those 10 years as by then they'd lost interest, but in the early days they egged him by saying that if he got rid of me they would be interested. Typical Yank company !!

The worst was to come for I brought up the fact that evidence had been put into the hearing that was patently illegal. That was looked at after the hearing by another hearing officer (Landau) who found that my ex agent had no right to the mark. He was allowed to appeal this and at that hearing, I was kept out of it and that was a travesty of justice in itself, but what happened behind my back at that hearing was a blatant case of corruption and illegality that you couldn't make up, let alone believe the IPO would have the brass to commit. For their own law department boss (James) plus the Judge (Hobbs QC) both conspired to GIVE BUSBRIDGE MY EX AGENT ADVICE AND HELP AS TO HOW HE COULD CIRCUMVENT THE DECISION THAT HAD WRECKED HIS ILLEGAL AND CRIMINAL ACTS OF THEFT FROM ME, AND NO ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO CONDUCT THAT HEARING AS AN APPEAL HEARING. HE SHOULD HAVE MADE LEGAL ARGUMENTS AS TO HOW THE DECISION HE WAS APPEALING WAS WRONG. IN FACT HE HARDLY SAID A WORD. IT WAS ALL SPEECH BY HOBBS GIVING (ILLEGALLY) ADVICE.

Reading all that again sent me into another bout of my being 'RAGING MAD' (Hence the name of this blog) For despite my reporting that Judge to all the British Legal departments that one has to use in this corrupt country, they all protected that Judge. I even wrote to Ken Clarke (that utterly useless buffoon of a Tory Dickhead who I'd love to stick my fist into his stupid face every time he gets onto TV to spout his claptrap comments) and of course he did nothing. I also made a formal complaint to the CEO of the IPO and guess what.....ANOTHER WHITEWASH.

After this, Busbridge just carried out all the advice he'd corruptly and illegally been give by this Hobbs and James criminals and eventually in 2010 he was awarded my Trade Mark and it was taken off me, as if 'I had never owned it' Don't forget I had previously fought Chrysler and they had used Busbridge as their one and only witness. Yet with all their money and top legal help, they lost as I had proved beyond doubt that I was first to use it in the UK. So how was the IPO able to just take it off me with that statement 'As if I had never owned it' HOW CORRUPT AND ILLEGAL CAN YOU GET ???? Of course if I was rich, I could have taken it all away from those corrupt bastards in the IPO and to the High Court where maybe one could expect to get REAL INDEPENDENT JUDGES  TO SEE ALL THE ILLEGAL GOINGS ON, PREVIOUSLY.

Why do I keep all these files and evidence? Well the criminal acts committed by the IPO and my ex agent BUSBRIDGE ( who still carries on making and selling the car I designed and gave the mark of VIPER to) will never die with time. If I ever win the lottery or somehow be able to fund a legal challenge to all the above facts, then I will need those files etc. So they and the IPO should all pray every night that I never get to be able to do this, for if I do, the IPO will owe me a great deal of compensation for ruining my life and HOBBS, JAMES and BUSBRIDGE could end put with a criminal record.

Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 69.

 

THE IPO

You may well ask what have they got to do with the Corrupt Dorset Police. Well no doubt you have not read all of this blog for if you have you will know it started because of the corrupt way the IPO were dealing with me over the stealing off me, of my Trade Mark Viper, by my ex agent and aided by the IPO. The Dorset Police came into the equation when I went to them in Sept 2009 to ask them to investigate the perjury and forgery committed by Busbridge in any number of IPO court hearings. You will see despite my pointing out to the IPO that this was going on and they should investigate and that included me making to their CEO a Formal Complaint that they were ignoring criminal acts and refusing to investigate them, they refused to lift a finger.

So after the final debacle of a corrupt hearing held in 2010 where I was told by the IPO they would deal with these criminal acts.....they of course never even touched on them. So then I was obliged to go to my local thoroughly corrupt mob of criminals in uniform and beg them to investigate.  It was when they started treating me as if I were a criminal that I included them onto this blog.

Well this last week I have suddenly got time on my hands so I started to sort out all the bundles of files on all this very unsavoury behaviour by the IPO and the DPA. (Dorset Police Authority) Hopefully when I win the lottery I can  use them to sue the ass off all those bastards who ruined my thriving business and stole all my designs and Trade Mark. Fat chance but I can dream on. Anyhow doing this has brought back to me just how corrupt all these BASTARDS are. Reading all the evidence of that and what they did has once more enraged me and made me as mad as hell. Reminded me just how helpless British people are when trying to fight the ESTABLISHMENT !!!(When they don't have the money to do so, and they tell us we live in a democracy ???)

I read the emails and letters I did managed to drag out of the IPO through the FOIAct. In a couple of them we have two totally corrupt and criminally minded bastards from no less than the LEGAL OFFICE of the IPO, telling the useless and corrupt cop in Bournemouth Police, a Sgt Brimicombe all the lies and bad mouthing about me, that he could think of. All that of course was done to colour him against me, paint me as being this and that, so he would be put off DOING HIS JOB  and being independent and looking at the reams of documentary evidence I'd given him. So this IPO asshole by the name of Colombo tells Brimicombe that I write this blog and......STATES THAT HE FOUND THE ENTRIES EXTREMELY SHOCKING AND OFFENSIVE SO BEWARE IF YOU DO READ IT. He then gives him my URL so he can read it which I know he did.
Now, this even now when I re-read it some years on, brings it home to me just how CORRUPT THE IPO ARE !!! and just how they did every dirty trick in the book to stop me from ever getting JUSTICE AGAINST THE ROTTEN, CORRUPT AND CRIMINAL BASTARDS !!!! HOW THEY WERE UTTERLY DETERMINED TO TAKE OFF ME MY T/M AND GIVE IT TO THIS CROOK BUSBRIDGE.

You see I pull no punches in this my blog AND I CONTINUE TO DO SO. So why do I do this? Why did I call all those bastards in the IPO that and call them criminals.......because I WANTED THEM TO TAKE ME TO COURT, maybe on libel charge or dream up some criminal charge to heap upon me. That way I would have been able to get legal help, to show up in court just how corrupt and criminal they all are and were. For which I had no money (and they knew this)  to take them to court. Of course they have never done that for they know they would lose.

So here are their names once again for the World to see:- JAMES - HEAD OF LEGAL DEPARTMENT OF THE IPO. ......COLOMBO - LEGAL DPT.....HAYWARD - LEGAL DPT.


I also vainly hoped some legal entity would read all I showed in this blog and would volunteer to help out them all. Of course in this country unless your story gets big and in the news....you have no chance. The papers only want salacious stories and boring stories about some old bloke whose had his life made a misery at the end of it.....just isn't the type of news they look for. I KNOW FOR I TRIED AGES AGO AND GOT NOWHERE.

Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 68.

POSSIBILITES RE CHYSLER & THE IPO>

Those of you who have been following this enquiry may like me have been appalled by the antics of the various ex Met chiefs who have been interviewed. What a bunch of twisting liars they presented as. Of course two of them who were supposed to be running the Met, when I was trying to get those useless bastards to investigate Busbridge. Stevens was one and he as with the rest, lied his head of about what he knew about the phone hacking.
One of them had to resign because of his involvement in dubious goings on. Now what really hacks me off is the deafening silence we always get when the media expose our useless and corrupt cops. During all these sickening relevations of the past weeks at this enquiry, not one politician has voiced his concern that we obviously have a throughly discredited and corrupt police force in the Met and this force is supposed to be the premier force of the UK. Of course all the different forces are the same but the Met should be a shining example, which it simply isn't and never has been. Except it is a shining example of just how corrupt coppers can be.
No, our pollies don't seem to be in the slightest bit bothered, when what they should be doing is going all out to expose them for what they are and cleaning the filth up. So the bastards just keep getting away with it....the incompetence and the corruption just carries on.
I rarely meet anyone who has any time for the BASTARDS these days and I am talking here about people I know or meet, who like me cannot stand our police and have no time for them at all, not those who are criminals or yobs, as I do not mix with the trash of Brit life in any way. These are all people like myself, professionals or business people and the like. How have we got to the stage in Brit life when so few people have the slightest faith in the very people who are supposed to be there to protect us from the scum of the Earth???

Going back to what I have said in the past few posts as to why did the IPO behaved in the way it did over this whole case. Many may think that my thoughts on what was the reasons the IPO did what they did and the possible actions Chysler may have carried out, are too far fetched. Well think about this; in addition to what I've already put forward, Chrysler when they started to export their Vipers to Europe, spent a lot of money in promoting their car. They set up a special racing series for that car and as I've said no Yanky international company will spend what they did only to have some upstart like me get in their way of being able to call their car in the UK, by the name of Viper.
That is eactly what I did, first by stopping them from being able to register that name in the UK after I won that hearing with the IPO in 1996. What Chyrysler did after that was to deliberately try and ruin me with legal costs by saying they were going to appeal it and then dragging their feet for FOUR YEARS until I went to a legal team and FORCED them to give up. They KNEW they had no case, so why did they behave like this......BECAUSE LIKE SO MANY YANK COMPANIES.... THEY HAD NO MORALS.
Even after they had to drop their saying they wanted to appeal, they carried on calling their car, in the UK, by MY REGISTERED NAME OF VIPER. So I had to take legal action which stopped them and they had to pay my costs.
Now what I am trying to point out to you, is that any company that behaves in the corrupt and immoral way, like they did for over ten years and over them wanting to own that name, IS PERFECTLY CAPABLE OF PAYING SOMEONE IN THE IPO FROM THE BEGINNING BACK IN 1992, TO SWING THINGS FOR THEM. And of course anyone in the IPO who was part of that corrupt action, would do anything to hide that fact and that would include doing to me what they did and making sure that Busbridge got the T/M, as they knew he was in with Chrysler. They knew that once he got the rego of the T/M, he would sell it to Chrsyler and then Chrysler will have got what they wanted. Of course what they never realised at the beginning is that I would put up such a fight which made all the procedures last for going on 20 years.
There will be those of you who will know that long before that period of time was reached, Chryslers fortunes took a big turn for the worse and they very nearly went out of business. Also in the meantime their Viper simply never took off in the UK or Europe as it was a typical peice of Yank rubbish as far as sportscars went and not really the type of sportscar Europeans go for.. They never sold very many at all.
However whoever in the IPO got themselves in the pay and involved with Chrysler had by doing that, carried out corruption and illegal activities which they would have to cover up. It is not such a tall story at all as these things happen all the time in the civil service for if you like me, follow what goes on in British life will know. Civil servants get themselves into corruption all the time and let us not forget......... THAT THE POLICE ARE ALL CIVIL SERVANTS THEMSELVES AND LOOK AT WHAT CORRUPTION THEY HAVE BEEN INVOLVE IN, OVER ALL OF MY LIFETIME AND SOME OF WHICH IS NOW COMING OUT INTO THE OPEN!!!!
STILL THINK CIVIL SERVANTS ARE AS CLEAN AS A WHISTLE? 

Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 67.

CORRUPT GOVERNMENT>FACTS THAT PROVE THIS>

Now that the Leveson enquiry has reached the point where a top woman Police Officer has just reported facts that I have been saying in this blog for three years now; that all government departments are steeped in corruption because too many of its officials have been up to their necks in corrupt practices. Mainly by taking back handers from the media and others.
Well tell us something new is what I say. Of course in my case they have been corrupt in that way, I am sure, and in other ways which I have highlighted in this blog and my book, over and over again. Now this is all out in the open I feel that I must now put forward my own ideas that I have had for a long time, as to just how the IPO have been corrupt over the 20 year history with them.
So here is what I feel is a real and feasible explanation as to why they acted against me and went to the ends of the earth to see me stripped of my IP in the Trade Mark Viper, I so obviously and legally owned. One has to go back to the beginning of my blog and see how things started off. The reason Busbridge tried to prove he owned my Mark Viper, was simply because he found out that Chrysler wanted to register that mark for itself, starting with their application to register it in Jan 1990. They did not realise that I had been using it since Jan 1986 and therefore had prior usage and the first claim to it, but I had not registered or applied to register it. However this did not negate my rights to it and Chrysler simply did not do their homework and search everywhere as to if someone else was using it. Or they thought they were so powerful they could brush aside people like me.
I feel that when Busbridge contacted them, ( and don't forget I took him on as an agent in eraly 1988 so any connection (as my agent) goes to that date) it is entirely possible that they then did do some exploring of the UK car trade and if so, they would have seen straight away that I had a powerful claim to it and that Busbridge DID NOT. For instance I did the 1987 London Car Show at Earls Court which is where I got the multi million pound order from Japan. So any decent person would say that I was perfectly legally the user of that Mark. He was unable to produce ANY evidence that he had used it IN ANY WAY prior to Feb/March 1988 when I licensed him to use my mark as my London agent.
I believe that they then decided that the easiest way to get rid of me was to use Busbridge to smear my name with accusations that I had committed forgery when I produced a copy of the license I gave Busbridge in 1989 a proof that any claims he was making that he owned the mark were a lie and completely false. He of course colluded with them over this.
One also has to take into consideration that Chrysler are obviously an American company and so many such companies are thoroughly corrupt and will do anything to get their own way. Understand this if you will; they had made their Viper sports car in the States and then they decided to sell it in Europe. No American company would do that if they did not expect to be able to sell many Vipers. They would not have taken such steps to just sell a few and to be able sell they would need to register the Mark Viper in ALL the European countries. In all the countries in Europe they would meet no resistance to doing this as no one else was using the mark there. In the UK they met resistance from Busbridge in the first instance and then me when I found out what he and they were up to and this in 1992.
I believe that they thought that if they first of all got rid of me with the help of Busbridge, (as I obviously had the stronger claim to the Mark) then they would have no trouble to get rid of him as he was standing on quicksands as he could show no evidence that would be accepted as real proof as to his bona-fide ownership. To do this they had to get my opposition to them registering the Mark, heard first.
The trouble for them was, that I believe that the IPO should have actually given Busbridge first shot at opposing their application, as he applied shortly before me to oppose them.  (And that fact should in no way make it that he had the stronger claim as the IPO later on claimed for any claim to a T/M should rest solely on who used it first and not who applied to register it first) Now the thing was they did not do that but gave ME first shot and the hearing in 1995 was held with them using Busbridge as their supposed witness against me and using these false allegations of forgery. Why did this happen in this order, one has to ask?
So the most way they did this was through the London based Intellectual lawyers that Chryslers were using at that time. Throughout all the time I have been involved in this thoroughly corrupt tale I have seen that many intellectual property law companies are up to their necks in it with the IPO. I do not believe that when you have a situation were lawyers are in constant contact with such a governmental organisation as the IPO, that they are not going to make cosy alliances and arrangements with the IPO. This so that cases can be conducted in an easy alliance in such a way as can only be done in such a place like England. Let us not forget that we are dealing here with the UK Establishment, with its Public schoolboy set and their "you scratch my back and I will scratch yours" and all that kind of stuff. IP lawyers will want an easy life and so will the civil servant lot in the IPO, who in the top ranks will have similar backgrounds to their lawyer buddies in the law firms.
So I believe that Chrysler will have told their lawyers to fix it so that someone high up in the IPO makes sure that the rules are bent in Chryslers favour. WHAT OTHER EXPLANATION IS THERE FOR THE IPO TO HAVE PUT ME IN FIRST TO OPPOSE CHRYSLER WHEN BUSBRIDGE SHOULD HAVE BEEN OPPOSING THEM FIRST????
However to get the IPO to direct me to have my opposition application heard first is against their own rules as the first application should be heard first, but had that happened it would have almost certainly failed for Busbridge for as I have said-he had no case. He would have then been cast out of the way for good and then Chrsylers would still have had to deal with my bona-fide application with its strong irrefutable evidence of first usage of the mark.
If you read all the evidence of what has gone on since that first fateful opposition hearing you will see time and again that the IPO and its corrupt officials have taken steps to thwart me. Breaking the rules again and again. The only possible explanation for the perplexing questions of; "why did the IPO make all these corrupt actions just to make sure I had my registration taken away from me after I had gained registration"
You may say "well you did gain registration and so how did that happen of the IPO was so corrupt and in the pay of Chrsyler?" Well you see that hearing which Chrysler thought they had in the bag, actually went against them. I believe that the hearing officer who heard that case in 1995 was not obeying orders to find against me and that put the cat amongst the pigeons. ( you might say he was an incorruptible civil servant) Why do I think this is what happened? Well you have to look at a few remarks that have slipped out along the way and have been made by IPO officials. Like the remark that was made by Judge Hobbs to Busbridge in his later hearing where he colluded with the IPO head manager, a Mr James, to swing that hearing totally in Busbridges favour, give him all the corrupt help and ideas as to how he should proceed so that the IPO could then swing things around and back to his favour and enable him to proceed and complete his stealing of my trade mark. He (Hobbs)alluded the the travesty of that hearing of mine against Chrysler, in 1995 and what he really meant was that it had not gone the way that Chrysler and the IPO had wanted it to. The hearing Hobbs heard, you will see if you have read all this blog or my book was heard because another straight hearing officer actually, at yet another hearing found for me a pointed out that Busbridge had no rights to the mark and for several reasons. So Busbridge had to appeal this or get knocked out completely AND the IPO just had to find reasons and ways in which to correct matters for them and Chrysler. They set this hearing up with a thoroughly in their pocket Judge, to advise Busbridge how he could take steps to circumvent the previous judgement that he lost and thus get back on track and that way the IPO could swing things their way and for him and Chrysler. Thus getting rid of me at last.
Because of the cock-up of me winning the 1995 opposition hearing against Chrysler, the IPO had to go through the motions of giving me registration and then find reasons to take it back off me. (you will have to read all the history to see how all that was done and why.) I believe that someone high up was paid a back hander and it could have been more than one person that was paid off by Chrsyler, no doubt through their lawyer, and this too meant that all those implicated would be scared shitless that they would be found out. That would mean that it was imperative that they destroyed me and my business, so as to get rid of me. You can see that this was on their minds by the remarks the hearing officer made in that last hearing in 2010 when they completed their dirty deeds and against all the overwhelming evidence against them and Busbridge....and stripped me of my legally registered trade mark.
You can also see how the IPO have worked to stop me getting Justice when they colluded with the thoroughly corrupt Met Police to block my attempts to get the Met to investigate the forgery and perjury of Busbridge at ALL the 8 hearings that took place and the Trial I had to undergo in 2000.
You may say that I am dreaming and making all this up and these kind of things just do not go on. If you think that, then it is you who is the dreamer who simply is not living on this planet. For now it is all out and quite clear just what goes on with all the rotten corrupt civil servants, the Police and especially the Met Police, who have been taking bribes for years off the media and others. If they are capable of doing that, then a simple case of taking back handers off another corrupt American global company who will do anything for the bottom Dollar, is complete chicken feed and VERY probable. For the facts of this case contains so many FACTS that are inexplicable and can only be explained by something having gone on in such a way as I have outlined above and in my book "Justice Denied" and other places in this blog.

Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 66.

The Intellectual Property Office which is yet another governmental body of asshole civil servants who are never wrong and who have things so well wrapped up that no one member of the British Public (apart from rich ones)can ever get Justice against, when these bastards decide they are going to do you over.
This is what this whole blog is about (in case you haven't been reading it from the start in 2008). They of course decided for reasons best known to them that they would allow a conman to steal all my IP, thus ruining my whole life. (as outlined in this blog).
Now, on idly searching the web under "Complaints against the IPO" I could see website after website set up by these assholes. ( I make no apology for calling them assholes, either) Amongst the many websites they show are some that highlight that if one is not happy with the IPO, there are procedures by which one can make complaints about them. Seeing that you would think that this is all very fair and you will be safe.
Let me tell you the truth. I have used these so called safe guards many times and they are a con on the Public. They are a set up and designed to go through all the motions that a complaints procedure is being carried out, but the outcome is predetermined against you ever winning. No Sir!! I have even complained to their CEO's (three different ones at different times as they seem to change them frequently) Even though I laid out in very clear terms with evidence, that I had been dumped on and that the IPO's own laws had been disregarded and broken, most of what I said was ignored and the rest twisted so as to appear that nothing wrong had ever happened. So you get nowhere. AND there is really no way you can appeal to anyone 100% INDEPENDENT!!
You can ultimately complain to the Parliamentary Ombudsman, but what in REALITY is he?? Well they would have you believe that they ARE independent, but they are LIARS. For all these people are, are yet ANOTHER BUNCH OF LYING, CORRUPT AND TWISTED CIVIL SERVANTS only there to protect their fellow civil servants. For they do exactly the same as anyone in the IPO does and that is ignore your evidence of wrongdoing, make loads of excuses on behalf of their brothers in arms and all this takes 6-9 months before you get your inevitable whitewash letter rejecting all your complaints and evidence. WELCOME TO JUSTICE 'BRITISH STYLE' RUN BY THE VERY PEOPLE YOU PAY TO KEEP IN EXISTENCE, IN THEIR CUSHY JOBS WITH EARLY RETIREMENT ON HUGE PENSIONS....THEY ARE ALL ASSHOLES AND SHOULD BE AS JEREMY CLARKSON SAID....SHOT IN FRONT OF THEIR FAMILIES. (For Treason and crimes against the British Public)