Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 37.

Since my last post I have talked with my lawyer to hear what he now thinks about my appealing
this monstrous latest decision and after he had conferred with a barrister.
Just like appealing against the first monstrous decision made back in 2004 when I lost my opposition against the reptile from registering my trade mark, which I could not afford to take before a High Court, I would have to do the same here to appeal this one. I told my lawyer that I could only do it if it were done on a no win no fee basis.
So he says that he can only do that if a barrister has a look at the facts surrounding this last hearing and decision. He comes back and says he thinks that if the IPO stick rigidly to saying they had to stick to IP law which says that the first applied for registration has precedence over one made after, no matter about the surroundings facts of perjury, and bad faith and the fact that the application was not done lawfully in the first place, then we will lose the appeal. Or at least we could lose, as it would depend of course on some wretched Judge, and we all know how they are in this wretched country.
So the upshot is, like all lawyers who operate on the 'we will win no matter if we win or lose'
syndrome, he will not take the slightest chance and I would have to be willing to fork out maybe £20,000 and the rest. That is out, so the Forces of Evil win AGAIN!!!!! The CROOKS AND CRIMINALS WIN AGAIN AND THE LAW ABIDING LOSE OUT AGAIN. Such is life in this rotten country of ours where only the rich stand a chance of winning, for they can fill the pockets of the fat cat big time lawyers.
However there is one avenue that I can still go down and I am just starting off down that one. But I have no faith in the government departments you are forced to use and this last avenue will rely on yet another bunch of civil servants. The only maybe, saving grace, is that they have no connection with the corrupt IPO mob. I am hoping that it will not turn out to be yet another case of; 'we civil servants have got to all stick together and cover all our arses' We will see.

HOWEVER I HAVE TO SAY THAT EVEN IF THE EXCUSE THEY ARE NOW USING THAT BECAUSE KINGS PATENT AGENTS FAILED TO PUT MY APPLICATION IN TO REGISTER THE MARK A FEW DAYS AFTER BUSBRIDGE DID, WAS VALID (AND DO NOT FORGET I HAD RIGHTS TO THE MARK UNDER COMMON LAW WHICH THEY HAVE IGNORED). THEN WHY DID THEY NOT SAY THIS FROM THE START, WAY BACK IN 1992? WHY DID THEY PUT ME TO THE TIME AND EXPENSE OF 8 YEARS OF FIGHTING THEM? WHY WAS I ABLE TO USE THE MARK FROM 2002 TO 2010 AND THEY SAID NOT A THING ABOUT THIS EXCUSE THEY ARE SAID TO USE IN 2010 AND NO ONE EITHER ON THE BUSBRIDGE SIDE OR ANY OF THEIR HEARING OFFICERS SAID-YOU CAN PLAY NO PART AS YOU WERE LATE IN PUTTING IN YOUR APPLICATION TO REGISTER.

 

Corrupt Police & IPO- How they aided a crook. 36.

Well I got the decision at last, but only after chasing the bastards. Give you all ONE GUESS AS TO WHICH WAY IT WENT.................You may remember in previous posts and indeed in my last post, I said quite clearly that I doubted it would go my, way because for the IPO to agree with my arguments would be to admit they had been incompetent.
I have to say I make a better clairvoyant than a fighter of incompetent civil servants, because their decision document is an absolute disgrace in every way. It is even more brazenly arrogant, biased against me, deliberately ignoring 75% of my legal arguments AND the legal arguments of my lawyer, than I believed it could be. In fact EVERYTHING that my lawyer put forward in writing and verbally at the hearing, was TOTALLY IGNORED. It is like I never took on a lawyer at all. Every legal point he put forward to show how the IPO had taken wrong decisions and what the law actually said, was IGNORED. They even had the cheek and arrogance to say that they only allowed him to speak in my defence at the hearing.......'as an indulgence' by them. It must be pointed out that he only spoke for me and not for Martin Busbridge, who represented himself.
It was intimated by the hearing officer, one George Salthouse that I was forger, that Martin was
consumed with hatred for his brother, that obviously everything he said could not be believed.
Plus a whole lot more which I am not listing here but will in time be shown, by putting a link to this document, in due time.
Unbelievably they did not mention ONCE our complaints as to the persistent perjury that Busbridge was guilty of, and which they said before the hearing they would deal with. These poxy civil servants are so consumed with covering their arses from all the incompetent mistakes they have made since 1992, that they are willing to lie and cover up for a person who is nothing short of a CRIMINAL. However in my opinion they did slip up by ADMITTING THEY ALLOWED ME TO HAVE THE REGISTRATION OF VIPER (my trade mark since 1986) IN 2002 AND IN VIOLATION OF THEIR OWN RULES. Now if they are correct in this and I believe they are not, you have to then take it that since 2002, I have spent 8 years locked in legal battle with Robert Busbridge and the IPO trying to put right the wrongs of the IPO, all for nothing. You have to ask the IPO, if I was not even legally entitled to my own trade mark, then why did they allow me to fight FOUR hearings which took up an enormous amount of my time and cost me at least £10,000? The reptiles even charged me £500 last year to renew my registration that I should not have even had. (according to their latest pronouncement) Not to mention the huge costs I had to pay for this latest hearing when all along they say they MADE A MISTAKE IN ALLOWING ME TO HAVE REGISTRATION. SO THAT MEANS FOLKS, I WAS MADE TO PAY TO DEFEND A REGISTRATION I DID NOT REALLY HAVE......... for they pronounced that my registration now stands as if it had never been made. Get your head round that!!!!!!!!

I HAVE TO SAY THAT IF I WAS NOT ENTITLED TO OWN THAT TRADE MARK 'VIPER' FROM DAY ONE, WHY WAS IT THAT CHRYSLER DID NOT USE THAT ARGUMENT AND WIN ON THAT POINT. WHY DID THEY NOT STRAIGHT AWAY APPEAL IT ON THAT POINT-THAT I HAD NO RIGHTS TO IT AND WHY IS IT THAT THE BUSBRIDGES WOULD HAVE ANY RIGHTS TO IT WHEN THERE IS SO MUCH EVIDENCE THAT I STARTED IN JAN 1986 TO USE IT ON MY COBRA REPLICA. WHY DID A PATENT SPECIALIST AGREE THAT I DID OWN IT AND FAUGHT CHRYSLER ON THAT POINT. Why was it that the IPO has never in the past and all the battles, letters and hearings-ever say that, over all those years. ONLY COMING UP IN 2010 WITH THAT LIE OF AN EXCUSE AND INDEED IF THEY WERE RIGHT I HAVE A CASE FOR ALL THE HASSLE AND LIES  & COSTS THEY HAVE PUT ME TO AND ALL BECAUSE THEY MADE A MISTAKE (AND THAT ONLY IF WHAT THEY CLAIM IS TRUE & I BELIEVE IT IS NOT TRUE-BASED ON WHAT I KNOW ABOUT IP LAW WHICH I HAVE BONED UP ON EVER SINCE 1992. PLUS WHY DID THEY SAY I WAS A FORGER WHEN I WAS EXONERATED IN COURT ON THAT ACCUSATION AND MARTIN BUSBRIDGE HAS NOW SHOWN BY HIS EVIDENCE THAT THE ALLEGED FORGED AGENCY DOCUMENT WAS NOT FORGED BUT SIGNED BY HIM AND HIS BROTHER. IT IS ALL LIES PUT OUT BY THE IPO BECAUSE THEY KNOW THEY HAVE THE POWER TO DO SO AND GET AWAY WITH IT.......AND ALL THAT IS EXACTLY SEEN IN THE RECENT POST OFFICE CASE NOW OUT IN THE OPEN IN 2023/24.  BUT LIKE MY CASE HAS GONE ON RIDDEN WITH LIES  BY THE JUSTICE SYSTEM, THE POST OFFICE AND THE GOVERNMENT SINCE THE EARLY NEW MILLENIA. 

Corrupt Intellectual Property Office-How they aided a crook. 35.

Since my last post after the hearing of the 28th Jan 2010, we are here three months later and still no decision given. Are the IPO scrabbling around trying to think of how they can squirm out of the predicament they have got themselves into??? I mean they have spent the time since 1992 listening to a serial perjurer lying to them ad nauseum and now his lies have been blown and they have been put into the position that they simply have to do something about the perjury.

However of course to do so means they will be admitting that they are dysfunctional, incompetent and have given succour to a criminal and have walked all over a legitimate owner of a trade mark and have ruined that persons life and health, in doing so. AND WE ALL KNOW HOW MUCH CIVIL SERVANTS JUST HATE TO HAVE TO ADMIT THEY ARE INCOMPETENT. Are they scrabbling around trying to work out just how they can get out of the hole they have dug themselves into, hence they delays? Their own guidelines say that a decision should come within 4-6 weeks and here we are at twice that time. My solicitor rang them a month ago asking what was going on, to get the answer that they were just starting to put together their decision, so what were they doing for two months after the hearing?? My guess is that they are having problems working out how to give an honest decision and deal with the serial perjury committed by this criminal who has run rings round them. In the meantime he happily is trading on with his copy of my product and using my trade mark, as if nothing has ever happened and he has committed no crimes. On the subject of crimes I have heard that in 1991/2 he did indeed commit crimes which I am trying to find a way of being able to bring to the attention of 'our simply wonderful Police' ??
I just wonder what their answer is going to be, but if it is another one of their whitewashes, they will have another fight on their hands as I do not intend to let them get away with their 19 years of sheer incompetence -to my detriment. I will fight them until my death if necessary as I have never been willing to put up with the ruling classes of this rotten country. They walk all over the ordinary folk, all the time and I am just one of hundreds of thousands who have suffered at their hands. Look at how the bastards treat our armed forces when they have suffered dreadful injuries and that is only one example.
SO KEEP WATCHING THIS SPACE AS WE MAY GET A DECISION SOON AND THEN IT IS ONTO THE AFTERMATH OF THAT, AS IT'S NOT OVER UNTIL I GET REAL JUSTICE!!!


Their own guidelines state that decisions should be forthcoming within 4-6 weeks and here we are at a point of time that is TWICE THAT LENGTH OF TIME. My solicitor even asked them a month ago what was happeneing and was told that the decision making was about to be started and we should get the decision in April. SO WHERE IS IS IT?? JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED AND ALL THAT. However the IPO are not interested in justice and I just wonder where it will all go. If justice is not forthcoming they are going to have a real fight on their hands as I am not going to cave into the bastards. I will die first before I do that, so we will see and if it does not come this month then the fight will start

Corrupt Intellectual Property Office-How they aided a crook. 34.

The hearing was as I expected. A no nonsense, bruiser type bother boy, hearing officer, called Salthouse. He was no doubt hand picked by the IPO to make sure that the Busbridge brothers did not come to blows or indulge in endless slagging each other off. And of course to make sure the hearing was conducted to the good of the IPO.

I thought that Robert Busbridge showed his usual colours of a cringing, snivelling liar, trying to belittle his brother and of course me. He told his usual lies of how he was a saint and saviour of the customers of Brightwheel Replicas after it had ceased trading, when of course by my taking on the brothers as my agent after this event, it gave those customers somewhere to go, and they benefitted beacuse this of course gave Cobretti business. He also tried to pin the bankruptcy of BRL on me, when he knew full well that the company had ceased trading due to my partners closing it down AFTER I had resigned. The hypocrosy of this evil man knows no bounds, for he completely ignores his own bankruptcy and the effects on HIS creditors.Well I hope the IPO ignored all that kind of irrelevant crap. However they have form for not ignoring it and being swayed by his lies.
My lawyer did a very good job of laying out case law regards the partnership and the non legal way it finished, thus making the application by only one partner, for registration, void. He also gave many reasons why the application for the Invalidity of my registration should fail, all based on law. How the two main reasons Busbridge relied on for this application, namely passing off and he having a prior right to me, where all legally wrong. Pointing out that it was he that was guilty of passing off my product and trade mark not the other way round.
I will attach the skeleton argument to this blog soon, so you can all see our argument.

Now this Salthouse made a comment at the beginning of this hearing which ABSOLUTELY LAID IT OUT INTO THE OPEN WHY TEH IPO HAVE SPENT SO MUCH TIME OPPOSING MY EVERY MOVE FROM 1992 RIGHT THROUGH TO THIS 2010 HEARING. HE SAID THAT THE IPO WERE WELL AND TRULY FED UP WITH MY CASE WHICH HAD GONE ON FOR SO LONG AND TAKEN UP SO MUCH OF THE IPO's TIME THAT THEY WERE GLAD THAT THIS SHOULD END IT ALL. THAT IT WOULD RECIFY A MISTAKE THEY HAD MADE. (Now the never said exactly what he meant by all that but it is clear to me what he meant).

 For what he was saying was that as far as the IPO were concerned the Hearing Officer who heard my opposition case to Chrysler over registering my Trade Mark, had made a mistake and obviously that would have given Chrysler the case and my Trade Mark. I have long thought that there was jiggery pokery involved in that case and I have as you will see, said that I always thought that Chrysler bent arms in the British Government to get this Trade Mark (that they already had registered in all of the EU, given to them). Don't forget that they would have spent an enormous amount of money to set it all up to sell their 'Viper' in the EU & the UK. I wouldn't mind betting that the Hearing Officer who heard that case was under orders to do that. Now he was quite an old bloke ready I think fcoming up to retirement. Just maybe he didn't follow orders of being old stock so wouldn't get involved in non legal goings on-hence why Salthouse SAID A MISTAKE HAD BEEN MADE WHICH NEEDED TO BE CORRECTED and waffled on some more about this-see the transcript and you will see what I am saying. IT ALL STINKS TO HIGH HEAVEN-ONCE AGAIN.

Of course now we have to wait for the IPO to issue their decision, but I have absolutely no faith in them whatsoever, as I have constantly said. They have an agenda which is best known only to them. Once that decision is given, of course if it does go against me, I will appeal it. We will know exactly what had been in the IPO minds all along and we will then have their mindset out in the open and will be able to fight it. I got the impression that their minds were already made up prior to the hearing and the hearing was just window dressing. For they have read the written evidence and as they said have read all the previous hearings, so what was said at this hearing was nothing new.
Of course one big thing that the have to address, and we made sure we made comment on that, and that is the question of all the lies and perjury eminating from Robert Busbridge. We made sure we pointed out that the IPO had specifically said they would deal with that at the hearing.
Of course we made sure that his lying and dishonesty and making applications in bad faith, were highlighted. Of course now we had a second witness to all the dishonesty namely Martin.
I personally cannot see how the IPO can find for Robert based on his obvious lying and bad faith, and partnership law and IPO law that were not adherred to. But as I have said over and over again-the IPO have shown time and again they have an agenda on this case that is hard to fathom. So we will see.
In the meantime Robert Busbridge will be sweating it out, and if his demeanour at the hearing is anything to go by, which was not so cocky as before, he will be sweating it out.

Intellectual Property Office-How they aided a crook. 33.

THE 2010 HEARING BEING A DUAL HEARING ON MARTINS APPLICATION TO RECTIFY THE BUSBRIDGE REGISTRATION AND ROBERTS APPLICATION TO MAKE MY REGISTRATION INVALID. 28th January 2010. 9.30. London.

At last we are at a position were both I and Martin MAY get justice at last? Firstly Martin can get to see the fraudulant application to register a Trade Mark that did not legally belong to the Busbridges, and made in his name without his knowledge, get reverted to being listed at the IPO as having been made in the partnerships name and not as Robert Busbridge was able to fraudulantly get changed by perjury to only his name. Then the Landau decision at last enacted and the Registration will not be allowed to be renewed and will fall by the wayside.

If that happens then Roberts cheeky application to have my legal registration made invalid, will automatically be thrown out.

On top of this there is the perjury committed by Robert, not once but dozens of times, in order to gain registration. I as you will know if you have read this blog from the beginning, I have complained about his blatant perjury to the IPO and they said they would deal with this at this hearing.......WE WILL SEE, but as I now have a supposed expert lawyer representing me this time, maybe the IPO will now see that they will not be able to continue with their blatant disregard for justice and for not following the laws and rules. However I cannot help wondering if they even give a stuff, and will just go on blundering ever deeper into their cover up of their past injustices and maladministrations. For if they do find for me and Martin then they will be admitting that they made mistakes in the past. Those of you that understand the mindset of civil servants will know they JUST HATE ADMITTING THEIR MISTAKES AND WILL DO ANYTHING TO GO ON HIDING THEM. So watch this space for maybe a miracle will happen or maybe it will be business as usual?
I will want to see Robert Busbridge charged with PERJURY & PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE and if the IPO refuse to do this, then I will push the Police to do it. I am absolutely determined he is not going to get away with it, especially when he wasted over £100,000 of Public money, in having me charged with forgery and perjury, this by fraud.

Intellectual Property Office-How they aided a crook. 32.

In my post of the 13th Oct I alluded to the appeal hearing back in 2006 that Busbridge had heard in front of this odious man. Now I have disliked the British judiciary ever since 1971 when I first had contact with the wonderful British judicial process, and funnily enough that concerned a QC. Ever since then as I am an avid reader of the press I have been able to see that far from us having this wonderful legal system that politicians and people in the ruling classes would have us believe is the best in the World, I have only contempt for it.
Let us face it ALL Judges almost without exception, belong to the upper classes. They do not live in my World and they are totally out of touch with it. They are a cossetted class who are given time and again to handling cases like the buffoons that they are. They are supremely arrogant and nowadays they seem to believe that it should be they who rule this country. They have become incapable of handing down consistent, sensible sentences to the extent that some seem in need of being sectioned. I could ramble on but will desist as I am sure you get the picture.
Of course barristers belong to the same set as it is they who later on become Judges, so my ire is also directed to that useless section of our wonderful justice system, and this arrogant Hobbs QC is part of that mob. If you read the transcript of this appeal hearing which never issued a conclusion as the liar Busbridge dropped the appeal. Now why did he drop it? Simply because he was given advice by Hobbs and the IPO bloke also in attendance, as to how he could circumvent the decisions made by the Hearing Officer Landau, who said he was not entitled to the mark and it could not be renewed.
Of course giving advice in a case is 'ILLEGAL', but no matter for these arrogant oafs in ermine, are Kings (and some no doubt Queens) in their legal state. No one is able to say a dicky bird to them, and so they know they can do whatever they like and get away with it.
This explains why during that hearing the illustrious Hobbs felt he could with impunity, say that he thought that my opposition case to Chrysler was 'Sordid'. Now this opposition case had absolutely nothing to do with the appeal hearing he was chairing. So why did he say it? If you read right through the whole 'sordid' transcript it will be obvious as to why he said it. For it is glaringly obvious that he was showing extreme bias towards Busbridge and this was part of that.
Of course for any judge or other judicial person, to show bias is 'ILLEGAL' YET AGAIN HE FEARS NO ONE AND BLUNDERS ON WITH IT.

What would you think on reading all this crap? You I am sure would be hopping mad, in fact 'raging mad' So it is that is how I feel. So I, on not getting anywhere with the T/Sol, sent in my written complaint to the Office for Judicial Complaints. Let me say straight up, that I have nothing but contempt for ALL THE BODIES THAT HAVE BEEN SET UP TO SUPPOSEDLY DEAL WITH COMPLAINTS MADE BY THE PUBLIC, AGAINST VARIOUS GOVERNMENT BODIES. THEY ARE ALL AN OUTRAGEOUS WASTE OF TIME, ARE MERELY WINDOW DRESSING TO GIVE THE ILLUSION THAT THE WONDERFUL BRITISH POLITICIANS CARE ABOUT HOW WE MERE PEASANTS ARE DEALT WITH BY GOVERNMENT AND ITS ENDLESS BODIES.

I remember well that my MP back in the nineties, telling me that all these Ombsbudsmen are useless and a waste of time, and so it is with the OJC. For after the usual two months wait, I get a letter from some clerk, who I wonder what credentials she had, who threw out my complaint. The reasons she gave showed that she had not even read the transcript, and she completely ignored a lot of the complaints I had outlined in my letter. THIS IS WHAT ALL THESE USELESS CIVIL SERVANTS DO WITH COMPLAINTS. THEY CHERRY PICK A FEW POINTS YOU MAKE, WHICH THEY FEEL THEY CAN BULLSHIT THEIR WAY AROUND, IGNORE THE IMPORTANT POINTS, FILL THEIR LETTERS WITH HEAPS OF CIVIL SERVICE WAFFLESPEAK, THAT DOES NOT AMOUNT TO A ROW OF BEANS, AND THEN TELL YOU TO BUGGER OFF. (In as many words)

ANOTHER POINT THAT ANY READERS OF THIS BLOG MAY PONDER ON, IS THAT NO MEMBER OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM HAS EVER MADE ANY COMMENT ON THIS STORY AND I HAVE SENT MY BOOK 'JUSTICE DENIED' TO OVER 50 I/P LAWYERS, THE ADDRESS OF THIS BLOG, AND HAVE ASKED IF ANY LAWYER COULD READ BOTH. AS IT WAS IN MY OPINION A HORROR STORY SHOWING UP WHAT THE IPO AND I/P LAWS ARE ALL ABOUT AND HOW THE PUBLIC ARE SUBJECT TO NOT BEING WELL SERVED, ESPECIALLY IF THEY CANNOT AFFORD TO TAKE ON LAWYERS TO FIGHT THEIR CASE. LAWYERS WHO ARE THE MOST OVERPAID IN THE WHOLE SYSTEM, APART FROM MAYBE LIBEL LAWYERS. NEVER GOT ONE REPLY FROM ANYOF THEM.

Keep watching this blog if your interested in seeing the outcome of the forthcoming hearing re Busbridges attempt to make my Trade Mark registration invalid and my accusations of gross and persistant acts of perjury. His registration having been gained by perjury, fraud and perverting the course of Justice. Not forgetting his brothers accusation that Busbridge also committed perjury at the hearing that dealt with the application to correct the register. Do not forget I went to my local Police about the perjury and the IPO told them that they were best placed to deal with it. SO WE WILL SEE JUST WHAT THEY DO, OR MAYBE JUST WHAT THEY WILL NOT DO!!!

Intellectual Property Office-How they aided a crook. 31.

Again it has been some time since I last updated and this is because as we all know all government departments only move at snails pace. Even though I complained months ago about the provable perjury of Busbridge, they have refused to act only saying that they will deal with all that at the Invalidity Hearing which has taken until now for me to even get a date for it.
As I said in previous post I have taken on an I/P lawyer and he contacted the IPO to get them to agree to have a telephone conference to discuss the rolling up of three actions into one hearing. This was then made into two actions, namely the application by Martin to rectify the register again due to his brothers lies made throughout all the hearings. Martin sent the IPO a statement in which he laid out all his complaints as to what had happened throughout the various hearings which started in 2004 with his application to register the T/M. Especially Roberts application to rectify the register to read that he was now the only registered owner of the mark.
So the IPO turned this into an application to rectify made by Martin. Of course even though I am inextricably linked to all this, I was to be once again kept out of it. So at this conference which took weeks before it happened on the 17th Nov, my lawyer asked that I be allowed to be part of this process and that we wanted the application made by Busbridge to make my registration of my mark, made invalid, to be heard at the same time.
The IPO agreed to this but let us face it, it was no magnaminous decision as they really could not refuse, unless they wished to make it look like they were complete assholes. We were all given until the end of Dec 2009 to get in all our statements and evidence, then a hearing to be heard on the 28th January 2010. So this is now going to be very interesting and I am going to find out just what the IPO are really all about. Are they going to continue to deny me justice and ignore all my evidence once again, or are they finally going to start applying themselves, for now I HAVE SOMEONE ACTING FOR ME THAT CANNOT BE FOBBED OFF. (SO I THOUGHT BACK THEN) For it is not only me who is saying that all the statements made by Robert are lies, but his brother is confirming that all I have said was true and it was all lies.
The main lies being that there was a signed agency agreement in 1989, that they were agents, that they stole my trade mark off me as well as my car designs, that I did not abandon my mark to them, that Robert applied for registration in both their names without Martins knowledge, that Robert did try to sell the mark to Chrysler for half a million, thus giving him the reasons for all his actions, and he did that again without his brothers knowledge. That he lied in his statements saying he never knew where his brother was and the last known address of Martin in Spain, given the IPO in a sworn statement, was made up. Plus a multitude of other lies told in every statement he ever made in all the five hearings to date.
So now we have the task of replying to all the statements Robert has made in the two cases and demolishing them. As with all his statements they are full of vacuous waffle that have nothing to do with the cases and they still contain lies as he just cannot help himself from lying as he is a pathological liar.
So for those of you who are really interested in this unbelievable case, especially anyone who is in I/P, keep looking in as the end is hopefully on the horizon.

Intellectual Property Office-How they aided a crook. 30.

What did I tell you about our wonderful police? True to form I had to push them to do anything and at the end of it they tried to worm their way out of acting on the evidence I showed them. I don't know who I despise more...the civil servants or our wonderful police. They of course rang the IPO and they sure as eggs are eggs had a good talk amongst themselves about what a pain this Cook fella is. So the local cops end up saying that they were told by the IPO that they were best placed to do something about handling these charges about perjury and fraud.
Well that remains to be seen as what I am getting from the IPO tells me that it is not a foregone conclusion that they WILL deal with all this in the forthcoming Invalidity Hearing which I have applied for through my new laywers in order to invalidate them giving Busbridge my Trade Mark. This as the hearing officer will have to decide if it is relevant and shows perjury. My interpretation is that any hearing only will take note of the absolute relevant facts to do with that particular hearing. As this forgery was committed in all the previous hearings which were all about completely different subjects....how is it that they will take on board all my evidence of the fraud and perjury, which was at its most in the 2004 opposition hearing to Busbridge registering my Mark? So we will have to see. 

However the police did say that if it wasn't dealt with I could go back to them. They obviously were delighted to use whatever the IPO had said to them to give them the excuse to do what all police seem to do these days, when someone asks them to deal with law breakers. It seems to me that it is only when a murder is committed that they actually get off their fat lazy arses. Or when there is a chance for them to play cowboys and shoot someone or play the hard boys at a demo when they can kick someone or push them over etc etc!!

So now it is all hands on deck to get together my last lot of evidence to do with this invalidity application brought on by that bastard Busbridge. Of course I will also have the affidavit of his brother Martin to back me up. However Bob is going to get a surprise at this hearing. IT IS GOING TO BE ABOUT TWO MONTHS BEFORE THIS HEARING TAKES PLACE...SOMEIME IN 2010. MORE WASTING OF TIME. It is now going on 18 years since this all kicked off, thanks to the slowness of the IPO.

Intellectual Property Office-How they aided a crook. 29.

Well they turned out to be just another duplicitious time wasting buch of scumbags, so they can join the rest of their scumbag cousins in in the civil service. THEY KEEP ME WAITING 5 WEEKS AND THEN SEND A WAFFLING LETTER FULL OF EXCUSES, BUT END IT ALL BY SAYING THAT THEY CANNOT IN ANY CASE HANDLE COMPLAINTS AGAINST QC's. THANKS A HEAP, YOU WANKERS. BUT IT IS NOT JUST THEM TAKING ACTION AGAINST HOBBS. - WHAT ABOUT ALL THE HEARINGS I LISTED THAT ARE ALL TAINTED BY PERJURED EVIDENCE FROM BUSBRIDGE AND NOW CONFIRMED BY HIS BROTHER????????

Now I have to start all over again outlining the same complaint to another bunch of civil service tossers called the 'Office for Judicial Complaints' and no doubt yet another one of those useless quangoes that are set up to protect all the of the civil service. Want to take bets on what they will do.....close ranks behind one of their own (Hobbs QC) and he will get off scott free.

Of course the T/Sol gave this Hobbs character a copy of my complaint so he's had weeks now to cover his arse. His comments beggar belief, he obviously thinks I am just a peasant who simply cannot affect his 'Highness' in any way. Him being a big wig in the so called 'justice' world. He has the affrontery to say,' I considered to be conducive to the attainment of a just and fair outcome to the proceedings then pending before me' The high and mighty tossers think they are so high they cannot never be criticised. The last thing his so called appeal hearing was, was a properly conductive, fair and unbiased hearing. As I have complained, it was nothing but a biased cosy talk where the appeal was not heard, but ways were discussed how the applicant (Busbridge) could cheat me out of my Trade Mark.

I am not going to repeat what happened in that appeal hearing as it is commented on in previous posts. The the writer of the letter a P.Barber, whoever he is, goes on to list why my complaint had no merit. All rubbish and arse covering, of course. I will just have to go through the motions again with this next lot.

On the IPO front I am still getting the run round as whenever I ask for points to be cleared up whoever I am dealing with always acts dumb and I never am given the answer I ask for. Like when I asked why a Gittings was trying it on with my complaint of inaction when I gave him documentary evidence that Busbridge had committed perjury in his statement, which was put in as evidence at his registration application and my opposition to that, he then says it is part of the Invalidity action, yet to be heard. This he does because even though that statement has nothing to do with the application of invalidity, Busbridge threw it in to that case, to muddy the waters. So now I have gone back and insisted that the act of perjury had already been carried out in 2004, what are the IPO going to do about it, and to stop making excuses. So far SILENCE.

However things have moved on somewhat further on the other front. By that I mean that my complaint letter to the CEO which has been on hold, has now be widened to include an affidavit from none other than Robert Busbridges brother, Martin. This I told you about in my last post, and now the additional letter of complaint plus a copy of the affidavit has been sent out. It will be interesting to see just what the CEO does about this. But one thing is for sure, I am out to really get this shower, one way or the other. They have bent over backwards for this lying git for 18 years now, and now I have shown just how they have aided and abetted him to get away with PERJURY, FRAUD, FORGERY, PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE, OBTAINING A TRADE MARK THAT HE STOLE FROM ME BY THESE METHODS AND THAT THEY UNSTINTINGLY WENT ALONG WITH ALL OF THE ABOVE AND LET HIM GET AWAY WITH IT ALL, TO MY HUGE LOSSES OF PROFITS, BUSINESS AND HEALTH.
If the CEO does what I think he will do and rubbishes it all, it will just go on in other ways until I get JUSTICE.
Of course I have now given a dossier to my local Police about all the Busbridge perjury and the fact that his lies got the police to instigate an action of perjury and forgery against me, which cost the tax payer some huge amount only for them to lose big time. SO HE COMMITS PERJURY TO HAVE THE POLICE CHARGE ME WITH PERJURY  & FORGERY AND BACK IN 1999 'You couldn't make it up' as the Daily Mail writer is always saying about civil servants and the like. I have no faith in the police at all, and I bet you they will try to squirm out of doing everything. I will not let them get away with it, for it is possible to force them to act. SO THE FIGHT IS NOW HOTTING UP.

Intellectual Property Office-How they aided a crook. 28.

It has been a month now since I wrote to the TSol re their Hobbs QC and his antics. Still no action even though they have said they received my letter. So I have had to send another letter to demand some action due to the fact that I need closure on my actions against Cobretti/Busbridge and the fact that yet another hearing is coming up which is part of the overall story. I don't expect much out of them as no governmental department is going to admit wrong doing.

My complaint to the CEO of the IPO a Mr Fletcher, I told them to hold on until further evidence I had just got in was formulated into a second complaint letter. I mentioned this in my last post and now I am at liberty to divulge what that new evidence is. Those of you who have read this blog from the beginning will know that Robert Busbridge was originally in business with his brother Martin, when I took them on as my agents. That in June 1992 they split up and since then Robert has been saying he never knew where his brother had disappeared to. All I knew was that he was abroad somewhere. A few weeks ago I was rung up out of the blue by Martin who had returned to this country and he said he wanted to help me to get justice and to have his brother get his just rewards. He said he had had no idea what his brother had been up to regarding all the goings on with the IPO over the years, but now he could see via this blog and my other blogs, what had been going on.
Of course I knew that the split up had been acrimonious as Martin had lost his 50% of the business and had lost his house he had put up as collateral on a loan for the business. Also that his marriage had gone down as a result of all the hassle of the business etc. So we arranged a meeting and at this I was able to swop notes as to what had happened after they had decided to steal my business and trade mark off me. Martin freely admitted his part in it and now he said he wanted to make up for it by doing the right thing by me.
I was able to confirm the following;-
1/ They did indeed conspire to pinch my business off me in order to cut me out and make more profit. (I knew that bit, but now it was confirmed for others to see this too)
2/ That Bob had approached Chrysler and unknown to him and had posed as the legitimate owner of my T/M Viper in order to sell it them for £500,000, as I had heard way back.
3/That Bob had unknown to him had put in the applications to register the mark in both their names.
4/ Had engineered the break up in order that he (Bob) would be the sole beneficiary of the business and the £500K he hoped to get off Chrysler. He had told Martins wife that he was having an affair. (Nice one to do on your brother)
5/ Despite Bob telling the IPO that he did not know where his brother was (after the Landau hearing) and then giving the IPO a false address in Spain as being the last known address of Martin. This so the IPO could send Martin a letter asking if he would sign over his half of the business so that would give Bob the right to change the rectify the records. Of course he knew all along where Martin was living in Spain, only 5 K's from their Mothers house, who also lived in Spain and he had visited him their on a few occasions.
6/ That an agency contract was indeed signed by the two brothers back in 1989 and that they indeed had been my agents thereafter to June 1991 and had bought my Viper kits from me for resale. Something that Bob had always denied. So proving that he had lied to the IPO.
8/ That the advertising had been as I had described to Reynolds and namely under my control.

He could confirm many facts that I had told the IPO only to be ignored, and what this now means is that the application to register that was heard by Reynolds back in 2004 was solely made on the back of Lies and Perjury, made to 'Pervert the course of Justice.' This makes Reynolds decision making look as sick and vacuous as I have long said it was, for he ignored my evidence and believed the many lies of the arch liar R.Busbridge. How does that make the IPO look, I ask you all?
I asked Martin if the would be willing to back me up by making out an affidavit stating all the true facts of everything which happened up to the time he left, plus the bit about the perjury over his address. He agreed and this has now been done with a firm of IP solicitorsfor which I now have had to borrow money in order to finally get justice.
So I have now sent the CEO of the IPO a further letter with the affidavit and have demanded action and have said as far as I am concerned, every hearing that was heard by the IPO: The Reynolds hearing for the application to register, the Hobbs hearing for the appeal against Landau, the Foley hearing for Rectification, The Annand hearing for my appeal against Foley, where all tainted and should be declared null and void and that Police action should be taken for the perjury, committed by R.Busbridge on each of these hearings. I as I have already said have provided evidence of perjury which they obviously wanted to brush under the carpet.

As I know they will not want to take Police action, I have gone ahead and taken it myself. I wonder what our wonderful lazy and inactive Police will actually do. However I am determined they will take action and I will take every step I can to make them act. Just as I will against the IPO, for now my hand is strengthened somewhat. So it is all getting much more towards an end game now, but it will be a battle I know. Keep watching this space.