The Intellectual Property Office which is yet another governmental body of asshole civil servants who are never wrong and who have things so well wrapped up that no one member of the British Public (apart from rich ones)can ever get Justice against, when these bastards decide they are going to do you over.
This is what this whole blog is about (in case you haven't been reading it from the start in 2008). They of course decided for reasons best known to them that they would allow a conman to steal all my IP, thus ruining my whole life. (as outlined in this blog).
Now, on idly searching the web under "Complaints against the IPO" I could see website after website set up by these assholes. ( I make no apology for calling them assholes, either) Amongst the many websites they show are some that highlight that if one is not happy with the IPO, there are procedures by which one can make complaints about them. Seeing that you would think that this is all very fair and you will be safe.
Let me tell you the truth. I have used these so called safe guards many times and they are a con on the Public. They are a set up and designed to go through all the motions that a complaints procedure is being carried out, but the outcome is predetermined against you ever winning. No Sir!! I have even complained to their CEO's (three different ones at different times as they seem to change them frequently) Even though I laid out in very clear terms with evidence, that I had been dumped on and that the IPO's own laws had been disregarded and broken, most of what I said was ignored and the rest twisted so as to appear that nothing wrong had ever happened. So you get nowhere. AND there is really no way you can appeal to anyone 100% INDEPENDENT!!
You can ultimately complain to the Parliamentary Ombudsman, but what in REALITY is he?? Well they would have you believe that they ARE independent, but they are LIARS. For all these people are, are yet ANOTHER BUNCH OF LYING, CORRUPT AND TWISTED CIVIL SERVANTS only there to protect their fellow civil servants. For they do exactly the same as anyone in the IPO does and that is ignore your evidence of wrongdoing, make loads of excuses on behalf of their brothers in arms and all this takes 6-9 months before you get your inevitable whitewash letter rejecting all your complaints and evidence. WELCOME TO JUSTICE 'BRITISH STYLE' RUN BY THE VERY PEOPLE YOU PAY TO KEEP IN EXISTENCE, IN THEIR CUSHY JOBS WITH EARLY RETIREMENT ON HUGE PENSIONS....THEY ARE ALL ASSHOLES AND SHOULD BE AS JEREMY CLARKSON SAID....SHOT IN FRONT OF THEIR FAMILIES. (For Treason and crimes against the British Public)
Thursday 15 December 2011
Wednesday 17 August 2011
Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 65.
THE ICO
A few posts back I told you about how the Information Commissioners Office had dealt with my complaints about the IPO, the Met and the Dorset Police had refused to release to me documents that had been created after I had asked the Police to investigate Busbridge for forgery and perjury.
Of course the ICO are EXACTLY the same as all other quangoes and departments set up by government to give the illusion that if you are steam rollered over by a government body, you can at least go to some commissioner or other body to get redress. ITS ALL A SHAM AND NON OF THESE BODIES DO ANYTHING OTHER THAN PROTECT THE VERY BODIES YOU COMPLAIN ABOUT.......this is laughingly known as DEMOCRACY!!! If you believe in these bodies then your stupid and should be put away for your safety.
I know that the IPO sent DC Brimicombe of Dorset Police an email in which they supposedly gave him advice on whether perjury and forgery had been committed in their hearings. I know that because this oaf of a slimeball copper, told me he'd received this advice. Now how did he receive it?.......obviously through the email that the IPO said they were going to send him with this advice on it!!! Isn't that crystal clear? Yet it isn't apparently to the ICO. The IPO gave me copies of various emails etc but not this crucial email which they refuse to even comment on. The Dorset Police told the ICO that it had been destroyed so that proves its existence.
Yet in their latest letter to me today the ICO say "there is no strong evidence that it holds the disputed email now, if indeed it were ever held"
Now that statement just shows you how cynical these bastards are. First of all the IPO gave me copies of a few emails etc dating back years, yet miraculously now the ICO are hinting that this ONE EMAIL may not be around anymore! If it isn't then it has been cynically destroyed by the IPO so they cannot release it and this being the same as the DPS say they did to it. (If either ever did do this)
Then the cynical ICO hint that it just may be a figment of my imagination, and one has to ask, where did they get that idea from???? Yet why would the IPO tell Brimicombe they would send him this email with all the info in it that he'd asked for, and then not send it and why did this man then tell me he'd got all this info off the IPO and because of what he was told he would not investigate Busbridge. No doubt he was also told by the IPO I was a trouble maker, a nuisance, a nutter etc etc ad nauseam!! Hence why both the IPO & the DPS refused to let me see this email and now we have the ICO even saying they doubt it ever existed.... the bastards. So how can anyone have any faith that they are neutral and not as corrupt as all the other bastards in this story????
Then of course let us not forget that there was also another document, either a letter or an email that the IPO would have sent the Met in which they gave the same advice on me and all those hearings and whether perjury and forgery were committed.
The ICO ignored that complaint by me when I complained about the Met, just like they have done with the IPO & the DPS......what a corrupt shower.
These latest documents from the ICO to me and mine to them will show you all and will be put on this blog along with all the other documents.
This latest letter from the ICO was in reply to my complaint to them about their decision document of the 12th July, in which they exonerated the IPO and the DPS of all that I had complained about. I complained that many things I had said had been ignored and that I wanted them to answer my questions about that. Of course what happens when you ask specific questions to civil servants THEY ALWAYS IGNORE THEM AS IF YOU'D NEVER EVEN ASKED THEM. You will see this on those documents as I have notated on the copy of my letter where these questions have been ignored. You will also see that both the Freedom of Information Act and the Data Protection Acts are a completed farce and another con on the Public of Britain. You can ask for documents but if they will incriminate any civil servants you will not get them and you will be fed a whole bunch of excuses and be given so called parts of these acts, that allegedly give them the right to withhold what you seek. SO WHAT IS THE POINT OF THESE ACTS, I ASK????? Also you would have to be a good lawyer to know if what they tell you about these alleged parts of the Acts, are actually the truth or just made up. So they know that you as a non lawyer, will never know if you are being conned.
A few posts back I told you about how the Information Commissioners Office had dealt with my complaints about the IPO, the Met and the Dorset Police had refused to release to me documents that had been created after I had asked the Police to investigate Busbridge for forgery and perjury.
Of course the ICO are EXACTLY the same as all other quangoes and departments set up by government to give the illusion that if you are steam rollered over by a government body, you can at least go to some commissioner or other body to get redress. ITS ALL A SHAM AND NON OF THESE BODIES DO ANYTHING OTHER THAN PROTECT THE VERY BODIES YOU COMPLAIN ABOUT.......this is laughingly known as DEMOCRACY!!! If you believe in these bodies then your stupid and should be put away for your safety.
I know that the IPO sent DC Brimicombe of Dorset Police an email in which they supposedly gave him advice on whether perjury and forgery had been committed in their hearings. I know that because this oaf of a slimeball copper, told me he'd received this advice. Now how did he receive it?.......obviously through the email that the IPO said they were going to send him with this advice on it!!! Isn't that crystal clear? Yet it isn't apparently to the ICO. The IPO gave me copies of various emails etc but not this crucial email which they refuse to even comment on. The Dorset Police told the ICO that it had been destroyed so that proves its existence.
Yet in their latest letter to me today the ICO say "there is no strong evidence that it holds the disputed email now, if indeed it were ever held"
Now that statement just shows you how cynical these bastards are. First of all the IPO gave me copies of a few emails etc dating back years, yet miraculously now the ICO are hinting that this ONE EMAIL may not be around anymore! If it isn't then it has been cynically destroyed by the IPO so they cannot release it and this being the same as the DPS say they did to it. (If either ever did do this)
Then the cynical ICO hint that it just may be a figment of my imagination, and one has to ask, where did they get that idea from???? Yet why would the IPO tell Brimicombe they would send him this email with all the info in it that he'd asked for, and then not send it and why did this man then tell me he'd got all this info off the IPO and because of what he was told he would not investigate Busbridge. No doubt he was also told by the IPO I was a trouble maker, a nuisance, a nutter etc etc ad nauseam!! Hence why both the IPO & the DPS refused to let me see this email and now we have the ICO even saying they doubt it ever existed.... the bastards. So how can anyone have any faith that they are neutral and not as corrupt as all the other bastards in this story????
Then of course let us not forget that there was also another document, either a letter or an email that the IPO would have sent the Met in which they gave the same advice on me and all those hearings and whether perjury and forgery were committed.
The ICO ignored that complaint by me when I complained about the Met, just like they have done with the IPO & the DPS......what a corrupt shower.
These latest documents from the ICO to me and mine to them will show you all and will be put on this blog along with all the other documents.
This latest letter from the ICO was in reply to my complaint to them about their decision document of the 12th July, in which they exonerated the IPO and the DPS of all that I had complained about. I complained that many things I had said had been ignored and that I wanted them to answer my questions about that. Of course what happens when you ask specific questions to civil servants THEY ALWAYS IGNORE THEM AS IF YOU'D NEVER EVEN ASKED THEM. You will see this on those documents as I have notated on the copy of my letter where these questions have been ignored. You will also see that both the Freedom of Information Act and the Data Protection Acts are a completed farce and another con on the Public of Britain. You can ask for documents but if they will incriminate any civil servants you will not get them and you will be fed a whole bunch of excuses and be given so called parts of these acts, that allegedly give them the right to withhold what you seek. SO WHAT IS THE POINT OF THESE ACTS, I ASK????? Also you would have to be a good lawyer to know if what they tell you about these alleged parts of the Acts, are actually the truth or just made up. So they know that you as a non lawyer, will never know if you are being conned.
Monday 18 July 2011
Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 64.
THE MET POLICE AGAIN.
If you have been reading all the publicity over the weekend about the Met you will know that the head of this useless and corrupt shower, Paul Stephenson has resigned. So he should and this is the ***t that ignored my letter to him about the corrupt goings on between his men at Camden and the IPO. The conniving and colluding in order to stop me from getting justice over Busbridges criminal activities.
You will remember also that both corrupt bodies refused to release to me the incriminating documents that would have proved that they were corrupt and indulging in ILLEGAL ACTIVITES by colluding together to deny me justice.
So I am heartedly glad he's gone the bastard. I hope he and that other twerp Yates, rot in hell, but then both will still get their gold plated HUGE pensions etc and will now be able to live the life of Riley, so they will not mind one bit, I am sure!
THE DICTIONARY STATES:- CORRUPT...lacking in integrity, open to or involving in bribery or other dishonest practices, putrid or rotten....CORRUPTION, the act of corrupting or state of being corrupt...dishonesty. So those of you who probably think I use this word with gay abandon, think again! I think that my constant use of this word is entirely justified, as I use it in the context of describing the goings on of ALL the government departments that I have been forced to have to go to and then have to put up with their rotten acts of corrupt practices.
Certainly the Met are the most corrupt police force in the UK and always have been. However other forces are also corrupt too, like my local force the Dorset Shower. Not many people in Dorset have much good to say about them, either and you should read my link to the website called Dorset police.Then you will see some of the goings on they get up to. Same as the Met but on a smaller scale.
If you have been reading all the publicity over the weekend about the Met you will know that the head of this useless and corrupt shower, Paul Stephenson has resigned. So he should and this is the ***t that ignored my letter to him about the corrupt goings on between his men at Camden and the IPO. The conniving and colluding in order to stop me from getting justice over Busbridges criminal activities.
You will remember also that both corrupt bodies refused to release to me the incriminating documents that would have proved that they were corrupt and indulging in ILLEGAL ACTIVITES by colluding together to deny me justice.
So I am heartedly glad he's gone the bastard. I hope he and that other twerp Yates, rot in hell, but then both will still get their gold plated HUGE pensions etc and will now be able to live the life of Riley, so they will not mind one bit, I am sure!
THE DICTIONARY STATES:- CORRUPT...lacking in integrity, open to or involving in bribery or other dishonest practices, putrid or rotten....CORRUPTION, the act of corrupting or state of being corrupt...dishonesty. So those of you who probably think I use this word with gay abandon, think again! I think that my constant use of this word is entirely justified, as I use it in the context of describing the goings on of ALL the government departments that I have been forced to have to go to and then have to put up with their rotten acts of corrupt practices.
Certainly the Met are the most corrupt police force in the UK and always have been. However other forces are also corrupt too, like my local force the Dorset Shower. Not many people in Dorset have much good to say about them, either and you should read my link to the website called Dorset police.Then you will see some of the goings on they get up to. Same as the Met but on a smaller scale.
Wednesday 13 July 2011
Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 63.
THE CORRUPT LIARS OF THE MET AND THE USELESS CIVIL SERVANTS OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONERS OFFICE, WHO LIKE THE IPCC SEEM ONLY TO BE IN EXISTENCE TO PROTECT THE POLICE AND THE IPO. SO THEY TOO ARE CORRUPT BECAUSE IT IS OBVIOUS THAT THEY ARE DOING THIS KNOWINGLY AND DELIBERATELY. THUS PROTECTING THE POLICE AND DENYING ME JUSTICE
How many of you have watched those wretched Met Coppers on TV blagging and lying their way through the MP's questioning them. What an utter shower they all are.
Now folks this is coming from the very same mob of bastards that HAMPERED MY TRYING TO GET JUSTICE AND MY ASKING THEM TO INVESTIGATE BUSBRIDGES FORGERY AND PERJURY!! Talk about HYPOCRITES and what did they do, but hamper my efforts and in collusion with the IPO. Is it any wonder I couldn't get them to act on irrefutable evidence when they just went and colluded with another bunch of civil servants?
THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONERS OFFICE.
A few posts back I told you about how the ICO to whom I had complained about the Met and the Dorset Police, the IPO and the Parliamentary Ombudsman, all hiding from me documents that they all sent each other when I had tried to get the Met to investigate Busbridge. It really only involved TWO documents that I definitely knew existed. One the email the IPO sent Sgt Brimicombe of Dorset Police and two, the advice the IPO gave Sgt Downs at Camden Station to HELP him refuse to investigate. He admits in an email which is on this blog, that they gave him this advice.
In both cases I believe that the IPO will have disseminated to both the DPS & the Met, lies about whether forgery and perjury had been committed. I am also sure that they will have thrown in a load of derogatory remarks about me on a personal level.
This ICO mob gave me their decision re the Dorset Police a few weeks ago and how they were a bunch of whiter than white darlings who had done absolutely no wrong. I wrote about that a few posts back. Today I got their decisions about my complaints that all had refused me under the FOIAct and the DPAct and I talk now about the IPO & the Met.
The ICO have deliberately misread my complaints about both parties and in both cases they have twisted the requests I gave them in such a way as to be able to say that what I had asked for, was not able to be given to me. Yet what they say I had asked for is not what I had asked for, as I in the course of writing to both the Met & the IPO had honed my request down to those two specific documents. Originally I had asked for any documents they had that concerned me and in the case of the IPO what they had said to the Met and in the Mets case what they had said to the IPO or had received off the IPO and I specifically mentioned this one document. (the advice that the IPO gave Sgt Downs.)
In the case of the IPO I was specific about the email that they admitted they would send to the DPS. Yet what they, the ICO have done is spoken to the IPO and obviously have been fed lies by them which is what they do all the time. They try to say I did not apply under the right Act when the fcat is that I applied for the same under BOTH Acts and they say that information I had asked for could be openly seen under the Trade Marks journals which are open to the Public. This is a complete lie as what I asked for had nothing to do with any of the 8 hearings, so would never be found on any files open to the public. This is how these bastards work, by lying all the time and giving the ICO excuses so they can find for their mates in another government department. They are all shagging each other these civil servant bastards and covering up for each other.
In the case of the Met I even had to pay £10 in order to get any info off them under the DPAct. Yet when do the ICO even mention this so it's as if I am being told I did not apply under the right Act.
In both requests to the IPO & the Met I had simply asked to see both these documents which would have had in them matters to do with my request to get the Met to investigate all the forgery and perjury Busbridge had committed. All my letters about this are on this blog, so you can see for yourself what I asked for. Then the ICO deliberately complicate matters by constantly switching their remarks from one Act to the other and back again. The fact that there are TWO Acts that basically deal with matters that I think are the same. Some idiot in Parliament who thought up these Acts (in order to fool the Public that you could actually make civil servants give up incriminating documents) has I think deliberately made matters in such a way that the powers can obfuscate in all sorts of ways and tie you up in knots over what Act are you asking under? That is why I asked the same questions under BOTH Acts and they still lie through their back teeth and refuse you those documents. The whole thing is yet another sham and con on the Public.
In my case they have deliberately refused to give me those documents and the ICO have backed them up and as it is obvious the ICO have talked to the IPO it is also obvious that the IPO have given them a pack of lies. You can see how the ICO have been indoctrinated by the IPO as on the beginning of their decision document on the IPO, they state on page 2, under 'BACKGROUND', in 3 paragraphs, remarks about subject matter that I did not give the ICO. This is because they detail that I had a long running dispute involving trade marks etc etc, which they can only have got from some IPO mouthpeice. None of that is any business of the ICO and has absolutely no bearing on what I had asked to be divulged, as you will see from what I had asked to see. This proves beyond doubt that the ICO have been heavily involved in discussions about me on a personal level and with departments that I am complaining about. ONCE MORE THE IPO HAVE INDOCTRINATED ANOTHER GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT THAT I HAVE GONE TO TO GET JUSTICE.....OTHERS INCLUDE THE DPS, THE MET, THE PARLIAMENTARY OMBUDSMAN AND SO ON.IT IS ALL A SHAM AND DISGRACEFUL and they are able to get away with it, time and again. They wouldn't if I were rich!
Their remark that I have been 'involved in a long running dispute' is said by them, to make me out as a litigious person. Yet who started all the legal actions?..ROBERT BUSBRIDGE, IN 2002 WHEN HE APPLIED TO REGISTER THE MARK THAT I OWNED AND AT THE SAME TIME APPLIED TO HAVE MY TRADE MARK MADE INVALID. ENOUGH SAID????
Now that is pretty well all the actions I could take to get Justice and they have run their course. I will next week get all the latest documents onto this blog and you can read for yourself what has gone on in my latest efforts to get Justice from a number of quarters. (The Attorney General and the ICO.) I will type out explanation remarks for each document that has been lately generated.
There will also be documents from my battle to get the Attorney General to get the Police to investigate Busbridges forgery and perjury. You will be able to see what that bastard is all about too. Another useless sickening ***** filling his pockets with Public money and refusing to help those who he is supposed to serve and by a litany of excuses and outright lies. Yet another civil servant covering up for his fellow tossers. You will see how devious he and his minion McGinty has lied as laid out in my recent post. How I am told over and over how he cannot involve himself, but tucked away I am told that if I can prove by evidence I send him, then he could take steps, yet when I do exactly that all I get is a continuation of excuses. It is all there in black and white if you care to read it all.
How many of you have watched those wretched Met Coppers on TV blagging and lying their way through the MP's questioning them. What an utter shower they all are.
Now folks this is coming from the very same mob of bastards that HAMPERED MY TRYING TO GET JUSTICE AND MY ASKING THEM TO INVESTIGATE BUSBRIDGES FORGERY AND PERJURY!! Talk about HYPOCRITES and what did they do, but hamper my efforts and in collusion with the IPO. Is it any wonder I couldn't get them to act on irrefutable evidence when they just went and colluded with another bunch of civil servants?
THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONERS OFFICE.
A few posts back I told you about how the ICO to whom I had complained about the Met and the Dorset Police, the IPO and the Parliamentary Ombudsman, all hiding from me documents that they all sent each other when I had tried to get the Met to investigate Busbridge. It really only involved TWO documents that I definitely knew existed. One the email the IPO sent Sgt Brimicombe of Dorset Police and two, the advice the IPO gave Sgt Downs at Camden Station to HELP him refuse to investigate. He admits in an email which is on this blog, that they gave him this advice.
In both cases I believe that the IPO will have disseminated to both the DPS & the Met, lies about whether forgery and perjury had been committed. I am also sure that they will have thrown in a load of derogatory remarks about me on a personal level.
This ICO mob gave me their decision re the Dorset Police a few weeks ago and how they were a bunch of whiter than white darlings who had done absolutely no wrong. I wrote about that a few posts back. Today I got their decisions about my complaints that all had refused me under the FOIAct and the DPAct and I talk now about the IPO & the Met.
The ICO have deliberately misread my complaints about both parties and in both cases they have twisted the requests I gave them in such a way as to be able to say that what I had asked for, was not able to be given to me. Yet what they say I had asked for is not what I had asked for, as I in the course of writing to both the Met & the IPO had honed my request down to those two specific documents. Originally I had asked for any documents they had that concerned me and in the case of the IPO what they had said to the Met and in the Mets case what they had said to the IPO or had received off the IPO and I specifically mentioned this one document. (the advice that the IPO gave Sgt Downs.)
In the case of the IPO I was specific about the email that they admitted they would send to the DPS. Yet what they, the ICO have done is spoken to the IPO and obviously have been fed lies by them which is what they do all the time. They try to say I did not apply under the right Act when the fcat is that I applied for the same under BOTH Acts and they say that information I had asked for could be openly seen under the Trade Marks journals which are open to the Public. This is a complete lie as what I asked for had nothing to do with any of the 8 hearings, so would never be found on any files open to the public. This is how these bastards work, by lying all the time and giving the ICO excuses so they can find for their mates in another government department. They are all shagging each other these civil servant bastards and covering up for each other.
In the case of the Met I even had to pay £10 in order to get any info off them under the DPAct. Yet when do the ICO even mention this so it's as if I am being told I did not apply under the right Act.
In both requests to the IPO & the Met I had simply asked to see both these documents which would have had in them matters to do with my request to get the Met to investigate all the forgery and perjury Busbridge had committed. All my letters about this are on this blog, so you can see for yourself what I asked for. Then the ICO deliberately complicate matters by constantly switching their remarks from one Act to the other and back again. The fact that there are TWO Acts that basically deal with matters that I think are the same. Some idiot in Parliament who thought up these Acts (in order to fool the Public that you could actually make civil servants give up incriminating documents) has I think deliberately made matters in such a way that the powers can obfuscate in all sorts of ways and tie you up in knots over what Act are you asking under? That is why I asked the same questions under BOTH Acts and they still lie through their back teeth and refuse you those documents. The whole thing is yet another sham and con on the Public.
In my case they have deliberately refused to give me those documents and the ICO have backed them up and as it is obvious the ICO have talked to the IPO it is also obvious that the IPO have given them a pack of lies. You can see how the ICO have been indoctrinated by the IPO as on the beginning of their decision document on the IPO, they state on page 2, under 'BACKGROUND', in 3 paragraphs, remarks about subject matter that I did not give the ICO. This is because they detail that I had a long running dispute involving trade marks etc etc, which they can only have got from some IPO mouthpeice. None of that is any business of the ICO and has absolutely no bearing on what I had asked to be divulged, as you will see from what I had asked to see. This proves beyond doubt that the ICO have been heavily involved in discussions about me on a personal level and with departments that I am complaining about. ONCE MORE THE IPO HAVE INDOCTRINATED ANOTHER GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT THAT I HAVE GONE TO TO GET JUSTICE.....OTHERS INCLUDE THE DPS, THE MET, THE PARLIAMENTARY OMBUDSMAN AND SO ON.IT IS ALL A SHAM AND DISGRACEFUL and they are able to get away with it, time and again. They wouldn't if I were rich!
Their remark that I have been 'involved in a long running dispute' is said by them, to make me out as a litigious person. Yet who started all the legal actions?..ROBERT BUSBRIDGE, IN 2002 WHEN HE APPLIED TO REGISTER THE MARK THAT I OWNED AND AT THE SAME TIME APPLIED TO HAVE MY TRADE MARK MADE INVALID. ENOUGH SAID????
Now that is pretty well all the actions I could take to get Justice and they have run their course. I will next week get all the latest documents onto this blog and you can read for yourself what has gone on in my latest efforts to get Justice from a number of quarters. (The Attorney General and the ICO.) I will type out explanation remarks for each document that has been lately generated.
There will also be documents from my battle to get the Attorney General to get the Police to investigate Busbridges forgery and perjury. You will be able to see what that bastard is all about too. Another useless sickening ***** filling his pockets with Public money and refusing to help those who he is supposed to serve and by a litany of excuses and outright lies. Yet another civil servant covering up for his fellow tossers. You will see how devious he and his minion McGinty has lied as laid out in my recent post. How I am told over and over how he cannot involve himself, but tucked away I am told that if I can prove by evidence I send him, then he could take steps, yet when I do exactly that all I get is a continuation of excuses. It is all there in black and white if you care to read it all.
Wednesday 6 July 2011
Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 62.
NICK HERBERT THE POLICE MINISTER.
You will see on this blog that I have written a detailed book (Justice Denied) on the whole of this sordid story of IP theft by Robert Busbridge, how I was treated by endless corrupt and useless government civil servants who sided with this conman and who then stripped me of my IP and gave it to the crook Busbridge. How I then have tried to get Justice to absolutely no effect by the following entities:-
The IPO, The Police, the IPCC, the Justice Minister Ken Clarke, The Attorney General, plus
a host of MP's including my own useless tosser, Chope and so on-ad nauseam. I wrote this book 'Justice Denied' because as I am not rich I could not afford to go to law to try and get Justice. If I had been rich none of this would have happened anyway as I would have stopped it 20 years ago by using the best law brains in IP. I also decided the book should be sent to as many influencial people and bodies as possible, and I will be commentating in the next post on who I sent the book to and how it has been receiveda nd how successful I have or have not been.
For now this post is about one of those MP's one Nick Herbert the Minister for Police. I wanted him to be able to see what the organisation he should be responsible for have done to me. So off went the book with a covering letter. Today I got the book back with a covering letter which once again tells you how our governments think about the people who put them where they are and pays their overblown wages. How they really hold us in contempt, for what they do amounts to this and insults us further. My letter to Herbert and the reply I got from one of his faceless organ monkies will shortly go onto this blog, along with all the backlog that has built up of other documents of recent times, all from similar useless costly bodies of unctuous civil servants.
" The Minister receives so much correspondence that he is unable to reply personally to all those who write to him" So it starts straight away with a put down for this was no ordinary letter....IT WAS A LONG BOOK ON A VERY SERIOUS MATTER OF CORRUPTION WHICH INCLUDED THE VERY BODY HE IS SUPPOSED TO BE IN CONTROL OF!!WHICH OBVIOUSLY HAD TAKEN THE WRITER A LONG TIME TO WRITE AND HAVE PRINTED, AT NO SMALL COST. OBVIOUSLY ALL THAT HAS GONE OVER THE EMPTY HEAD OF THIS TOSSER, OR HE IS BEING THE USUAL CYNICAL SERVANT THEY ALL SEEM TO BE?
The writer then goes into a typical civil service, wafflespeak load of tripe, in which they make all sorts of excuses rather than give you a result. I will not repeat it all here, for it is all irrelevant trash. I say this for HE IS CALLED THE MINISTER FOR POLICE. Now what should that tell us?????? The writer, another McGinty character seems to think the Minister has no control over the Police at all, so what the hell is he for, I ask? This one goes by the handle of B.McGuire of no known gender and the letter is headed The Home Office.
The very same shower who sent me a letter some months back telling me that if the Police did not investigate it was tough shit mate! They are a force unto themselves AND NO ONE CAN CONTROL THEM!! I was to take my own legal action !!!!!!!!!
This is why we are forever being assailed, almost on a daily basis, of lurid stories about how the Police have failed one poor family after another. If it isn't useless coppers cocking up an important murder investigation, they are indulging in yet more corruptness, as in today's story about how more than 8 bastards stitched up 4 innocent men for murder and are now belatedly being done themselves. To messing up the Dowler investigation and to sitting on the facts about the NOTW phone hacking story, because they were all getting back handers. The very same old firm of the Met who colluded with the IPO to stop me getting justice!!
My point in this post is that this useless overpaid tosser Nick Herbert...what is he for and why is it that his Organ Grinder Monkies are deliberately keeping from him a story that HE SHOULD KNOW ABOUT? (they probably got straight onto the phone to their IPO mates to see what it was all about and were told to bury it)......DON'T THEY MAKE YOU SICK.
You will see on this blog that I have written a detailed book (Justice Denied) on the whole of this sordid story of IP theft by Robert Busbridge, how I was treated by endless corrupt and useless government civil servants who sided with this conman and who then stripped me of my IP and gave it to the crook Busbridge. How I then have tried to get Justice to absolutely no effect by the following entities:-
The IPO, The Police, the IPCC, the Justice Minister Ken Clarke, The Attorney General, plus
a host of MP's including my own useless tosser, Chope and so on-ad nauseam. I wrote this book 'Justice Denied' because as I am not rich I could not afford to go to law to try and get Justice. If I had been rich none of this would have happened anyway as I would have stopped it 20 years ago by using the best law brains in IP. I also decided the book should be sent to as many influencial people and bodies as possible, and I will be commentating in the next post on who I sent the book to and how it has been receiveda nd how successful I have or have not been.
For now this post is about one of those MP's one Nick Herbert the Minister for Police. I wanted him to be able to see what the organisation he should be responsible for have done to me. So off went the book with a covering letter. Today I got the book back with a covering letter which once again tells you how our governments think about the people who put them where they are and pays their overblown wages. How they really hold us in contempt, for what they do amounts to this and insults us further. My letter to Herbert and the reply I got from one of his faceless organ monkies will shortly go onto this blog, along with all the backlog that has built up of other documents of recent times, all from similar useless costly bodies of unctuous civil servants.
" The Minister receives so much correspondence that he is unable to reply personally to all those who write to him" So it starts straight away with a put down for this was no ordinary letter....IT WAS A LONG BOOK ON A VERY SERIOUS MATTER OF CORRUPTION WHICH INCLUDED THE VERY BODY HE IS SUPPOSED TO BE IN CONTROL OF!!WHICH OBVIOUSLY HAD TAKEN THE WRITER A LONG TIME TO WRITE AND HAVE PRINTED, AT NO SMALL COST. OBVIOUSLY ALL THAT HAS GONE OVER THE EMPTY HEAD OF THIS TOSSER, OR HE IS BEING THE USUAL CYNICAL SERVANT THEY ALL SEEM TO BE?
The writer then goes into a typical civil service, wafflespeak load of tripe, in which they make all sorts of excuses rather than give you a result. I will not repeat it all here, for it is all irrelevant trash. I say this for HE IS CALLED THE MINISTER FOR POLICE. Now what should that tell us?????? The writer, another McGinty character seems to think the Minister has no control over the Police at all, so what the hell is he for, I ask? This one goes by the handle of B.McGuire of no known gender and the letter is headed The Home Office.
The very same shower who sent me a letter some months back telling me that if the Police did not investigate it was tough shit mate! They are a force unto themselves AND NO ONE CAN CONTROL THEM!! I was to take my own legal action !!!!!!!!!
This is why we are forever being assailed, almost on a daily basis, of lurid stories about how the Police have failed one poor family after another. If it isn't useless coppers cocking up an important murder investigation, they are indulging in yet more corruptness, as in today's story about how more than 8 bastards stitched up 4 innocent men for murder and are now belatedly being done themselves. To messing up the Dowler investigation and to sitting on the facts about the NOTW phone hacking story, because they were all getting back handers. The very same old firm of the Met who colluded with the IPO to stop me getting justice!!
My point in this post is that this useless overpaid tosser Nick Herbert...what is he for and why is it that his Organ Grinder Monkies are deliberately keeping from him a story that HE SHOULD KNOW ABOUT? (they probably got straight onto the phone to their IPO mates to see what it was all about and were told to bury it)......DON'T THEY MAKE YOU SICK.
Tuesday 5 July 2011
Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 61.
WHAT DID I SAY TO YOU ABOUT THE ICO?????
I have now got their decision letter about my complaint about the Dorset Police Service and them not handling my request for information under the FOIA and the DPA.
You will have to go back to my posts about all that and see the attached emails and letters from me to them and vice versa.
They behaved disgracefully in the way they handled my request and basically put two fingers up to me, which is the norm these days for the Police wherever. Even a complaint to their Chief and the IPCC as you will also know from previous posts-got me absolutely nowhere.
This latest exercise in utter futility has gone exactly the same way. With yet another government department/quangoe refusing to act and siding with their bretheren fellow civil servants. The writer said that "It is likely that the DPS has complied with the requirements of the DPA" Now I don't know about you, but that is definitely not an unequivical statement made, because the writer has evidence they did. It is a wishy washy statement that one could say that equally it is unlikely they didn't. It is obvious that the ICO did not receive from the Dorset Police Service any evidence that the DPS did 100% act within the requirements of the Data Protection Act, as I am sure if they had, they would have said so in a firmer statement. In other words we are giving the benefit of the doubt to the Police because that is how we work. We do not work on behalf of complainents (the Public that is) we work for our fellow civil servants.
All my evidence that I was treated like SHIT by this lying copper Shaun Waldbridge, by him failing to deal with my request in the laid down proper manner and within DPA/FOIA rules, was cast aside and ignored as usual.
Then this Kelly Steen who wrote this garbage, further shows us all just how corrupt even her department is, by saying that the DPS 'appeared likely that they have provided you with the information held about you at the time of your request. Now as this simply did not happen we have to take it that again the ICO has seen no evidence that they did, because again they can only manage another limp 'well it is LIKELY etc etc' IT SIMPLY IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH AND IT IS EXACTLY WHAT I EXPECTED OF THEM.
Then Miss Steen compounds her uselessness by going onto state 'They have confirmed that the emails had been deleted by the time of your request'. Now what this is referring to is the ONE email I knew the IPO had sent DS Brimicombe, in which the IPO would have well and truly slagged me off and warned the DPS what a wanker I was and a trouble maker and not to have anything to do with me, let alone show me the email that would damn them all.
NOW DO NOT FORGET THAT BOTH THE DPS AND THE IPO HAVE BOTH REFUSED TO DIVULGE THIS EMAIL, NO DOUBT A DAMNING EMAIL, WHICH WOULD HANG THEM ALL.....THE ABSOLUTE BASTARDS.
What you should know is that as soon as I had got hold of the email that told me that a further email would be forthcoming to the DPS from the IPO, I asked to see it. That would be within no more than a week or so of my getting from that DS Brimicombe, a copy of the first email from the IPO to DS Brimicombe, because he left the email in my dossier that I'd given him. So are we to believe that the Police routinely get rid of all incoming emails within days of receiving them?...pull the other one. So it is yet more Police lying and the ICO going along with it.
This duplicitous Steen woman then goes into a protection mode of making excuses about how long organisations are allowed to keep emails etc before they trash them. We have to believe going on this case and what is claimed to have happened to that email, that it is only for a few days, and I simply do not belive that.
So what this means is that all three of my other requests to the ICO re the withheld documents, withheld by the Parliamentary Ombudsman, the Met Police and the IPO themselves, will end up the exact same way this has. Each organisation will trot out excuses and the ICO will back them and defend them with a litany of lying excuses.
What makes me so mad with all the government bodies that we the Public are supposed to be able to use to obtain justice against the civil service trash departments that shaft us and lie to us and side with the very people we are complaining about, are all sitting there in their vast offices all paid for by the Public purse. They consume millions of pounds of our money doing absolutely nothing. Shuffling peices of paper around making it look like they are seriously taking up complaints. When all the time, all it is is window dressing, smoke and mirrors to fool us that indeed there are organistions that will help us when we get done over by lying, useless, duplicious civil servants!! What a cesspit of iniquity the Establishment of this country are. I have said it before and I will say it again. There is no democracy in this country, no freedoms and we really live in a country no better that any dictators country or any banana Replublic. Yet these POLITICIAQNS RANT AND RAVE AT THE ASSADS AND GADAFFI'S OF THIS WORLD WHEN THEY DO TO THEIR PUBLIC THE SAME AS WE REALLY DO TO OURS. The only difference is that here the trash Politicians do it in a much more sophisticated way. They do not bump people off or make them disappear, but they just block any attempts to use the systems we are told should give us JUSTICE. It all goes back to what I have said time and again....IN THIS ROTTEN COUNTRY YOU ONLY GET JUSTICE IF YOU CAN AFFORD IT!! EVEN THEN THEY CAN STILL BLOCK YOU IF THEY WANT, BY JUST MAKING SURE YOU WILL GET A JUDGE WHO IS IN THEIR PAY LIKE JUDGE HOBBS.....(Refer to my previous posts on him and how that bumbling oaf Clarke refused to investigate his corruption (despite the evidence) and the way he manipulated the appeal hearing he was supposed to hear, in collusion with the IPO, so as to block my getting justice and showing how corrupt and useless the IPO really are.)
I have now got their decision letter about my complaint about the Dorset Police Service and them not handling my request for information under the FOIA and the DPA.
You will have to go back to my posts about all that and see the attached emails and letters from me to them and vice versa.
They behaved disgracefully in the way they handled my request and basically put two fingers up to me, which is the norm these days for the Police wherever. Even a complaint to their Chief and the IPCC as you will also know from previous posts-got me absolutely nowhere.
This latest exercise in utter futility has gone exactly the same way. With yet another government department/quangoe refusing to act and siding with their bretheren fellow civil servants. The writer said that "It is likely that the DPS has complied with the requirements of the DPA" Now I don't know about you, but that is definitely not an unequivical statement made, because the writer has evidence they did. It is a wishy washy statement that one could say that equally it is unlikely they didn't. It is obvious that the ICO did not receive from the Dorset Police Service any evidence that the DPS did 100% act within the requirements of the Data Protection Act, as I am sure if they had, they would have said so in a firmer statement. In other words we are giving the benefit of the doubt to the Police because that is how we work. We do not work on behalf of complainents (the Public that is) we work for our fellow civil servants.
All my evidence that I was treated like SHIT by this lying copper Shaun Waldbridge, by him failing to deal with my request in the laid down proper manner and within DPA/FOIA rules, was cast aside and ignored as usual.
Then this Kelly Steen who wrote this garbage, further shows us all just how corrupt even her department is, by saying that the DPS 'appeared likely that they have provided you with the information held about you at the time of your request. Now as this simply did not happen we have to take it that again the ICO has seen no evidence that they did, because again they can only manage another limp 'well it is LIKELY etc etc' IT SIMPLY IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH AND IT IS EXACTLY WHAT I EXPECTED OF THEM.
Then Miss Steen compounds her uselessness by going onto state 'They have confirmed that the emails had been deleted by the time of your request'. Now what this is referring to is the ONE email I knew the IPO had sent DS Brimicombe, in which the IPO would have well and truly slagged me off and warned the DPS what a wanker I was and a trouble maker and not to have anything to do with me, let alone show me the email that would damn them all.
NOW DO NOT FORGET THAT BOTH THE DPS AND THE IPO HAVE BOTH REFUSED TO DIVULGE THIS EMAIL, NO DOUBT A DAMNING EMAIL, WHICH WOULD HANG THEM ALL.....THE ABSOLUTE BASTARDS.
What you should know is that as soon as I had got hold of the email that told me that a further email would be forthcoming to the DPS from the IPO, I asked to see it. That would be within no more than a week or so of my getting from that DS Brimicombe, a copy of the first email from the IPO to DS Brimicombe, because he left the email in my dossier that I'd given him. So are we to believe that the Police routinely get rid of all incoming emails within days of receiving them?...pull the other one. So it is yet more Police lying and the ICO going along with it.
This duplicitous Steen woman then goes into a protection mode of making excuses about how long organisations are allowed to keep emails etc before they trash them. We have to believe going on this case and what is claimed to have happened to that email, that it is only for a few days, and I simply do not belive that.
So what this means is that all three of my other requests to the ICO re the withheld documents, withheld by the Parliamentary Ombudsman, the Met Police and the IPO themselves, will end up the exact same way this has. Each organisation will trot out excuses and the ICO will back them and defend them with a litany of lying excuses.
What makes me so mad with all the government bodies that we the Public are supposed to be able to use to obtain justice against the civil service trash departments that shaft us and lie to us and side with the very people we are complaining about, are all sitting there in their vast offices all paid for by the Public purse. They consume millions of pounds of our money doing absolutely nothing. Shuffling peices of paper around making it look like they are seriously taking up complaints. When all the time, all it is is window dressing, smoke and mirrors to fool us that indeed there are organistions that will help us when we get done over by lying, useless, duplicious civil servants!! What a cesspit of iniquity the Establishment of this country are. I have said it before and I will say it again. There is no democracy in this country, no freedoms and we really live in a country no better that any dictators country or any banana Replublic. Yet these POLITICIAQNS RANT AND RAVE AT THE ASSADS AND GADAFFI'S OF THIS WORLD WHEN THEY DO TO THEIR PUBLIC THE SAME AS WE REALLY DO TO OURS. The only difference is that here the trash Politicians do it in a much more sophisticated way. They do not bump people off or make them disappear, but they just block any attempts to use the systems we are told should give us JUSTICE. It all goes back to what I have said time and again....IN THIS ROTTEN COUNTRY YOU ONLY GET JUSTICE IF YOU CAN AFFORD IT!! EVEN THEN THEY CAN STILL BLOCK YOU IF THEY WANT, BY JUST MAKING SURE YOU WILL GET A JUDGE WHO IS IN THEIR PAY LIKE JUDGE HOBBS.....(Refer to my previous posts on him and how that bumbling oaf Clarke refused to investigate his corruption (despite the evidence) and the way he manipulated the appeal hearing he was supposed to hear, in collusion with the IPO, so as to block my getting justice and showing how corrupt and useless the IPO really are.)
Sunday 19 June 2011
Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 60.
I have talked recently about my efforts to get the Attorney General to force the Police or the CPS to get Busbridge investigated for all the forgery & Perjury he committed in 8 Tribunal Hearings and one County Court case, not to mention the same crimes he committed with getting the Police to charge me in 1999.
I told you about my sending the A/Gen a dossier bundle of evidence and what one of his minions, a McGinty and his goat, eventually replied in a short page and a half reply.
You always know that the civil servants have not even read any of what you have said in long letters and or as in this case a huge bundle of well over a 100 pages of documents of evidence etc, when all they can manage in reply is a terse one and a half pages of tripe.
As I told you it boiled down to this bum saying that the Att/Gen could not interfere in the fact that all the hearing officers, nor the trial Judge had asked that perjury be investigated or the forgery. Of course they didn't, the useless lazy bastards. In the case of the IPO hearing officers they, I believe by virtue of the evidence of their actions and subsequent actions and statements made by the IPO, they wanted me to lose. That is apart from one,-the Landau decision, but there the IPO deliberately ignored his pronouncement that Busbridge was to lose and they then went onto manipulating events so that his verdict could be ignored. So this McGinty uses this as the excuse that the Att/Gen cannot and will not do anything.
However this is a BIG LIE as the CPS in a document, which I copied to this McGinty Git say " absense of such a recommendation does not mean that there is no justification for an investigation" and this means that if the oaf of a hearing officer or a Judge doesn't see what is staring him in the face, and or takes no notice that he is being told by the person against whom perjury and forgery is being committed, that is is being committed, it means that the injured person should be able to ask the Att/Gen to look into the matter, for JUSTICE IS NOT BEING SERVED by the perjury and forgery being ignored. Remember what the Scottish prosecutor said about not allowing perjury to be ignored and the very good reasons for that. It seems in England the establishment do not adhere to the high standards they do in Scotland!!!!!!!!! But then I am but a mere peasant who does not matter, and Sheridan was a well known public figure....so there you have your answer.
In fact, he then goes on to say that if I got Busbridge to admit he had lied and here I must point out that in all my efforts to get justice EVERY civil servant I come across deliberately IGNORES the fact that FORGERY has been also committed and this is because forgery is easy to prove. At least it is in my cases, but no, they don't want TO KNOW about forgery so they ignore that and stick to the perjury where they can lie and make these excuses for not acting because as McGinty said "If the matter was brought to his attention by the trial Judge (here he in his ignorance, fails to see that Judges do not hold IPO hearings, but biased Hearing Officers who are IPO employees-do ) I am toldthat it is not enough for one party to claim that his opponent has lied, that is for the court to determine in the proceedings"
Of course they say this because they simply want to brush all this under the carpet. It leaves people like me in the hopeless situation where, because corrupt hearing officers or stupid lazy Judges either do not want to see what is happening in front of them, even when it is pointed out to them AND evidence has been put into the proceedings which show what is going on, it means you get your hands tied. It means that in every court case in upper courts or lower courts like tribunal hearings, all that happens is that people in them lie and lie and lie and they know they will get away with it BECAUSE THE SYSTEM DOES NOT WANT TO DEAL WITH LIES, AS IT IS ALL TOO MUCH FOR THE SYSTEM. IT IS EASIER TO IGNORE IT, WHICH IS WHAT IS HAPPENING TO ME. I have to suffer miscarriages of Justice and the trashing of my Human Rights under the H.R.Act that should be giving me the right to fair trials.
If I were a BLACKMAN or an ASIAN TRYING IT ON TO ENABLE ME TO STAY IN THIS COUNTRY, I WOULD BE TRAMPLED TO DEATH IN THE RUSH OF CORRUPT LAWYERS ON THE GRAVY TRAIN OF HUGE MONIES TO BE MADE, DEFENDING ALL THESE KINDS OF PEOPLE, WANTING TO TAKE ON MY CASE. Or if I were a criminal I would also be able to get a lawyer to help me win. In my case I cannot even get a Human Rights lawyer to answer an email of enquiry, let alone get them to take on the case. IT IS DISGUSTING.
IT IS ALSO DISGUSTING THAT THIS MCGINTY (AND HIS GOAT) SAYS I SHOULD GET BUSBRIDGE TO ADMIT HE LIED. IS THIS BLOODY MAN STUPID OR RUBBING IT IN TO SAY THAT, AS HE MUST KNOW THAT THIS IS THE LAST THING BUSBRIDGE WOULD DO? After being successful over 20 years of making over 200 seperate lies and forging 5 documents and he thinks he will suddenly cave in and admit to even only one lie. I WOULD LIKE TO PUKE ALL OVER THIS DEVIOUS BASTARD MCGINTY FOR WHAT HE HAS SAID TO ME, ALL IN ORDER TO SQUIRM OUT OF THE ATT/GEN DOING ANYTHING.
So there you have it, in the UK the mere ordinary bloke on the street once again gets trampled on by the Corrupt and useless Establishment who would rather see the peasants continue to suffer injustices. It saves them money and the hassle and they know we cannot resort to Law as we cannot afford the stupendous costs involved by taking on the bloodsucking lawyers, who let's face it are their friends. All of the same class. Went to the same Public schools and all that.
Lastly McGinty rubs it in by stating in his last paragraph that unless the Att/Gen has a trial Judge telling him that perjury was committed he will not act. My evidence isn't good enough. Of course the only trial Judge I ever had was the was the one in the 2000 trial at Dorchester and he saw piles of perjury AND forgery being committed and DID BUGGERALL. All the IPO Hearing Officers as I have said won't do anything as some will be dead and or retired and in any case all were employees of the IPO, so we can be sure they were not independent and on IPO orders. Read through the papers of the 1994 hearing before Reynolds and tell me that that old buffer wasn't under orders to trash all my good evidence. It was so obvious that it was a sick joke.
Now that the Att Gen saga is over as I have gone as far as I can, it is only the Information Commissioner who is left where I could get valuable evidence of collusion between the IPO and the Met Police and the DPS, but you can safely bet he will act just like all the other corrupt government bodies and it will be a whitewash. Just you see.
I told you about my sending the A/Gen a dossier bundle of evidence and what one of his minions, a McGinty and his goat, eventually replied in a short page and a half reply.
You always know that the civil servants have not even read any of what you have said in long letters and or as in this case a huge bundle of well over a 100 pages of documents of evidence etc, when all they can manage in reply is a terse one and a half pages of tripe.
As I told you it boiled down to this bum saying that the Att/Gen could not interfere in the fact that all the hearing officers, nor the trial Judge had asked that perjury be investigated or the forgery. Of course they didn't, the useless lazy bastards. In the case of the IPO hearing officers they, I believe by virtue of the evidence of their actions and subsequent actions and statements made by the IPO, they wanted me to lose. That is apart from one,-the Landau decision, but there the IPO deliberately ignored his pronouncement that Busbridge was to lose and they then went onto manipulating events so that his verdict could be ignored. So this McGinty uses this as the excuse that the Att/Gen cannot and will not do anything.
However this is a BIG LIE as the CPS in a document, which I copied to this McGinty Git say " absense of such a recommendation does not mean that there is no justification for an investigation" and this means that if the oaf of a hearing officer or a Judge doesn't see what is staring him in the face, and or takes no notice that he is being told by the person against whom perjury and forgery is being committed, that is is being committed, it means that the injured person should be able to ask the Att/Gen to look into the matter, for JUSTICE IS NOT BEING SERVED by the perjury and forgery being ignored. Remember what the Scottish prosecutor said about not allowing perjury to be ignored and the very good reasons for that. It seems in England the establishment do not adhere to the high standards they do in Scotland!!!!!!!!! But then I am but a mere peasant who does not matter, and Sheridan was a well known public figure....so there you have your answer.
In fact, he then goes on to say that if I got Busbridge to admit he had lied and here I must point out that in all my efforts to get justice EVERY civil servant I come across deliberately IGNORES the fact that FORGERY has been also committed and this is because forgery is easy to prove. At least it is in my cases, but no, they don't want TO KNOW about forgery so they ignore that and stick to the perjury where they can lie and make these excuses for not acting because as McGinty said "If the matter was brought to his attention by the trial Judge (here he in his ignorance, fails to see that Judges do not hold IPO hearings, but biased Hearing Officers who are IPO employees-do ) I am toldthat it is not enough for one party to claim that his opponent has lied, that is for the court to determine in the proceedings"
Of course they say this because they simply want to brush all this under the carpet. It leaves people like me in the hopeless situation where, because corrupt hearing officers or stupid lazy Judges either do not want to see what is happening in front of them, even when it is pointed out to them AND evidence has been put into the proceedings which show what is going on, it means you get your hands tied. It means that in every court case in upper courts or lower courts like tribunal hearings, all that happens is that people in them lie and lie and lie and they know they will get away with it BECAUSE THE SYSTEM DOES NOT WANT TO DEAL WITH LIES, AS IT IS ALL TOO MUCH FOR THE SYSTEM. IT IS EASIER TO IGNORE IT, WHICH IS WHAT IS HAPPENING TO ME. I have to suffer miscarriages of Justice and the trashing of my Human Rights under the H.R.Act that should be giving me the right to fair trials.
If I were a BLACKMAN or an ASIAN TRYING IT ON TO ENABLE ME TO STAY IN THIS COUNTRY, I WOULD BE TRAMPLED TO DEATH IN THE RUSH OF CORRUPT LAWYERS ON THE GRAVY TRAIN OF HUGE MONIES TO BE MADE, DEFENDING ALL THESE KINDS OF PEOPLE, WANTING TO TAKE ON MY CASE. Or if I were a criminal I would also be able to get a lawyer to help me win. In my case I cannot even get a Human Rights lawyer to answer an email of enquiry, let alone get them to take on the case. IT IS DISGUSTING.
IT IS ALSO DISGUSTING THAT THIS MCGINTY (AND HIS GOAT) SAYS I SHOULD GET BUSBRIDGE TO ADMIT HE LIED. IS THIS BLOODY MAN STUPID OR RUBBING IT IN TO SAY THAT, AS HE MUST KNOW THAT THIS IS THE LAST THING BUSBRIDGE WOULD DO? After being successful over 20 years of making over 200 seperate lies and forging 5 documents and he thinks he will suddenly cave in and admit to even only one lie. I WOULD LIKE TO PUKE ALL OVER THIS DEVIOUS BASTARD MCGINTY FOR WHAT HE HAS SAID TO ME, ALL IN ORDER TO SQUIRM OUT OF THE ATT/GEN DOING ANYTHING.
So there you have it, in the UK the mere ordinary bloke on the street once again gets trampled on by the Corrupt and useless Establishment who would rather see the peasants continue to suffer injustices. It saves them money and the hassle and they know we cannot resort to Law as we cannot afford the stupendous costs involved by taking on the bloodsucking lawyers, who let's face it are their friends. All of the same class. Went to the same Public schools and all that.
Lastly McGinty rubs it in by stating in his last paragraph that unless the Att/Gen has a trial Judge telling him that perjury was committed he will not act. My evidence isn't good enough. Of course the only trial Judge I ever had was the was the one in the 2000 trial at Dorchester and he saw piles of perjury AND forgery being committed and DID BUGGERALL. All the IPO Hearing Officers as I have said won't do anything as some will be dead and or retired and in any case all were employees of the IPO, so we can be sure they were not independent and on IPO orders. Read through the papers of the 1994 hearing before Reynolds and tell me that that old buffer wasn't under orders to trash all my good evidence. It was so obvious that it was a sick joke.
Now that the Att Gen saga is over as I have gone as far as I can, it is only the Information Commissioner who is left where I could get valuable evidence of collusion between the IPO and the Met Police and the DPS, but you can safely bet he will act just like all the other corrupt government bodies and it will be a whitewash. Just you see.
Friday 10 June 2011
Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 59.
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
This guy and his office, as you will know, recently refused to order the Met Police to investigate the forgery and perjury committed by Busbridge at various court hearings and tribunal hearings over 20 years. Their vacuous and whitewashing excuses amount to nothing More than lies.
So here we have two points to consider. One in my case the IPCC behaved in a totally different way by refusing to ask the Met Police to investigate Busbridges forgery and perjury. ( On the lying excuse that I hadn't provided the Met with any proof despite my 3 inch thick dossier of evidence.
Of course I cannot ask my MP Poshboy Ellwood, to intervene as he is in on the cover up and refuses to act on my behalf.
So the A/General and his organ grinder monkey, this McGinty bloke, are lying (don't they all and all the time?) when he says the Att/Gen cannot investigate perjury that is committed in a Court. With my case where hearings had taken place, which were obviously miscarriages of justice and there was plenty of evidence of that because my human rights to fair trials/hearings had been trashed, he doesn't want to know as you have seen and that despite all the evidence I gave him.
Then very importantly and I asked the A/G about this: why was it that Busbridge was able to go the Met and allege I had committed ONE act of perjury and two acts of forgery at my hearing where I had opposed Chryslers application to register my Trade Mark and the Met swung into action straight away with an investigation through the Dorset Police? No excuses that forgery and perjury had to only be investigated on the word and request of the hearing Judge??? Double standards once again and why did the Attn/Gen ignore that question. I will tell you why....because it was too difficult to get round so he indulges via his Organ Grinder and his monkey, by ignoring it and telling porkies.
This shows how two faced he is and how he is willing to protect others in government and a consummate conman, rather than do the right thing. So he tells lies as to why he cannot investigate or ask the police to investigate, which he does all the time.
What a ******!!
This guy and his office, as you will know, recently refused to order the Met Police to investigate the forgery and perjury committed by Busbridge at various court hearings and tribunal hearings over 20 years. Their vacuous and whitewashing excuses amount to nothing More than lies.
So here we have two points to consider. One in my case the IPCC behaved in a totally different way by refusing to ask the Met Police to investigate Busbridges forgery and perjury. ( On the lying excuse that I hadn't provided the Met with any proof despite my 3 inch thick dossier of evidence.
Of course I cannot ask my MP Poshboy Ellwood, to intervene as he is in on the cover up and refuses to act on my behalf.
So the A/General and his organ grinder monkey, this McGinty bloke, are lying (don't they all and all the time?) when he says the Att/Gen cannot investigate perjury that is committed in a Court. With my case where hearings had taken place, which were obviously miscarriages of justice and there was plenty of evidence of that because my human rights to fair trials/hearings had been trashed, he doesn't want to know as you have seen and that despite all the evidence I gave him.
Then very importantly and I asked the A/G about this: why was it that Busbridge was able to go the Met and allege I had committed ONE act of perjury and two acts of forgery at my hearing where I had opposed Chryslers application to register my Trade Mark and the Met swung into action straight away with an investigation through the Dorset Police? No excuses that forgery and perjury had to only be investigated on the word and request of the hearing Judge??? Double standards once again and why did the Attn/Gen ignore that question. I will tell you why....because it was too difficult to get round so he indulges via his Organ Grinder and his monkey, by ignoring it and telling porkies.
This shows how two faced he is and how he is willing to protect others in government and a consummate conman, rather than do the right thing. So he tells lies as to why he cannot investigate or ask the police to investigate, which he does all the time.
What a ******!!
Saturday 28 May 2011
Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 58.
A few days ago I got the IPO pretending it was complying with the Freedom of Information Act and the Data Protection Act after I had reported them to the Information Commissioner for failing to give me copies of all the emails, records of telephone conversations or letters sent to the Met or the Dorset Police or the Parliamentary Ombudsman.
Initially they trickled out a few bits of paper from around 2004 which wasn't what I asked for. I complained to them and I got a few more from the time in questions but they were only copies of what I had already had,or about matters that were not what I asked for. In other words they were playing me for a fool once more, so I complained about them to the ICO.
They then with rapidity sent me a few more trickles of documents and I took them to task once more and this resulted in about a month ago, yet another exercise in duplicity. A few more documents that I already had and the documents I knew existed being ignored.
You may remember that the IPO had had emails sent between them and the Dorset Police. One I had got hold of clearly said that a guy called Hayward of the IPO was going to send an email answering questions the cop had asked him about me and my case. Obviously I needed to see this email as I can bet it contains explosive remarks which both the IPO and the Dorset pigs certainly do not want me to see. For if my intuition is right it will contain material that will incriminate both of the bastards.
So I sent this Julie woman another emails asking for this email. She sent me back an email this week saying that there are no more documents and that is that. In other words push off, that is your lot. Not answering you on the point about Haywards missing email. Of course all this is reported back to the ICO, but being yet another Government quango they will no doubt be all smoke and mirrors and will have no teeth as I have already commented on.
But what it clearly shows us is that all four bodies that have refused to give me what is my right to see only paints them black as black as they are clearly trying to hide material they know I can hang them with.....THE BASTARDS!!
Initially they trickled out a few bits of paper from around 2004 which wasn't what I asked for. I complained to them and I got a few more from the time in questions but they were only copies of what I had already had,or about matters that were not what I asked for. In other words they were playing me for a fool once more, so I complained about them to the ICO.
They then with rapidity sent me a few more trickles of documents and I took them to task once more and this resulted in about a month ago, yet another exercise in duplicity. A few more documents that I already had and the documents I knew existed being ignored.
You may remember that the IPO had had emails sent between them and the Dorset Police. One I had got hold of clearly said that a guy called Hayward of the IPO was going to send an email answering questions the cop had asked him about me and my case. Obviously I needed to see this email as I can bet it contains explosive remarks which both the IPO and the Dorset pigs certainly do not want me to see. For if my intuition is right it will contain material that will incriminate both of the bastards.
So I sent this Julie woman another emails asking for this email. She sent me back an email this week saying that there are no more documents and that is that. In other words push off, that is your lot. Not answering you on the point about Haywards missing email. Of course all this is reported back to the ICO, but being yet another Government quango they will no doubt be all smoke and mirrors and will have no teeth as I have already commented on.
But what it clearly shows us is that all four bodies that have refused to give me what is my right to see only paints them black as black as they are clearly trying to hide material they know I can hang them with.....THE BASTARDS!!
Tuesday 17 May 2011
Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 57.
Got the blighters letter today and it's the usual cop out you get from all these duplicitous government departments. Even if today Britain cannot do anything right, what they excel in is evading doling out Justice to the British Public, ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY KNOW TO DO SO MAY OPEN THEM UP TO BEING SUED FOR COMPENSATION!! IF ONLY I HAD THE MONEY TO DO SO.
This letter will be shortly shown on this blog under the documents link. But what it amounts to is this;
1/ When anyone in this country is part of a Tribunal Hearing that hearing will be held by a CIVIL SERVANT and NOT AN SUPPOSED INDEPENDENT JUDGE!!
2/ Any hearing Officer because he is not Independent can ignore whatever acts of forgery or perjury you show has been committed. He can ignore the evidence you show, not even discuss it at the hearing nor bring it into his decision making. In other words it is as if it were never there or had it brought to his attention. He can do this because he knows that he will never have his actions questioned by anyone and the aggrieved person will never be afforded any avenue by which he can get justice. Even when faced by a lawyer laying out how perjury has been committed he can simply ignore him and what he says and shows. He can ignore witness affidavits and statements, again with impunity.
3/ You will be faced with the fact that the hearing officer could actually be under orders to make sure that no matter what evidence he has put to him he should find for only one of the bodies involved. In my case it is my contention that the IPO did not want me to win because they knew if I did it would give me the evidence that the IPO had acted incompetently and I was of a mind to sue them. What better motive?
3/ You will be put in a situation whereby you simply have no avenue to correct these acts which constitute a miscarriage of justice. For the very court Judge (the hearing officer)can as I say, refuse to recommend the perjurer be investigated, the Police in collusion with the IPO, can decide also not to investigate and that lays both parties open the accusation that they have deliberately acted to deny justice to the aggrieved party. The IPO and the hearing officer who is an employee of the IPO know that the aggrieved will have no avenue to correct what has happened.
IS THIS WHAT DAVID CAMERON MEANT WHEN HE SAID THAT HE WAS GOING TO MAKE BRITAIN A FAIRER COUNTRY????? DENY THE PEASANTS ANY WAY THEY CAN GET JUSTICE AGAINST HIS OWN CIVIL SERVANTS????
This letter will be shortly shown on this blog under the documents link. But what it amounts to is this;
1/ When anyone in this country is part of a Tribunal Hearing that hearing will be held by a CIVIL SERVANT and NOT AN SUPPOSED INDEPENDENT JUDGE!!
2/ Any hearing Officer because he is not Independent can ignore whatever acts of forgery or perjury you show has been committed. He can ignore the evidence you show, not even discuss it at the hearing nor bring it into his decision making. In other words it is as if it were never there or had it brought to his attention. He can do this because he knows that he will never have his actions questioned by anyone and the aggrieved person will never be afforded any avenue by which he can get justice. Even when faced by a lawyer laying out how perjury has been committed he can simply ignore him and what he says and shows. He can ignore witness affidavits and statements, again with impunity.
3/ You will be faced with the fact that the hearing officer could actually be under orders to make sure that no matter what evidence he has put to him he should find for only one of the bodies involved. In my case it is my contention that the IPO did not want me to win because they knew if I did it would give me the evidence that the IPO had acted incompetently and I was of a mind to sue them. What better motive?
3/ You will be put in a situation whereby you simply have no avenue to correct these acts which constitute a miscarriage of justice. For the very court Judge (the hearing officer)can as I say, refuse to recommend the perjurer be investigated, the Police in collusion with the IPO, can decide also not to investigate and that lays both parties open the accusation that they have deliberately acted to deny justice to the aggrieved party. The IPO and the hearing officer who is an employee of the IPO know that the aggrieved will have no avenue to correct what has happened.
IS THIS WHAT DAVID CAMERON MEANT WHEN HE SAID THAT HE WAS GOING TO MAKE BRITAIN A FAIRER COUNTRY????? DENY THE PEASANTS ANY WAY THEY CAN GET JUSTICE AGAINST HIS OWN CIVIL SERVANTS????
Wednesday 4 May 2011
Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 56.
I have long said that the IPCC are yet another bunch of useless overpaid civil servants who are only there the apologise and defend the Police. I've said it on this blog and in my book and NOW WE HAVE THE IRREFUTABLE PROOF. For in today's Times Newspaper they state in their Editorial Comments column that the killing of Ian Tomlinson by the Met Police was UNLAWFUL, as did the jury....God Bless them. If it were not for juries we the British Public would forever be treated corruptly by the Establishment and especially the Police.
Look at how the very same Met Police treated me when I gave them irrefutable proof that a conman namely Robert Busbridge committed gross and persistent acts of forgery and perjury, they refused to even investigate my allegations despite the masses of evidence I gave them. They even said I had not even given them any evidence at all. So their usual gross acts of persistent lying. They never even interviewed me despite commenting that they did not "UNDERSTAND" that evidence I gave them. What a shower!!
Then when you rightly complain to the IPCC you are then given the run round and then in the end they engage in a flurry of excuse making to paint what the Met did as whiter than white and nothing to worry about.
Now what has this got to do with the killing of Tomlinson? Very easy to explain that, as the IPCC as they do, had to "Investigate" that gross act by a member of the MET!! All of us in the country knew that this was yet another example of how out of control the Met are. They are nothing more than a bunch of thugs and crooks in uniform as are all the Police in this country. Not only thugs, but crooks in uniform, as well. The IPCC did exactly with that investigation as they did with mine. That is they backed the murderous actions of the Met up to the hilt and did not advise that the policeman should be charged and tried for it. So we all could see he needed to be brought to trial, yet the IPCC engage in yet another gross act of white washing and grovelling to the Police. WHAT A SHOWER!!
Look at how the very same Met Police treated me when I gave them irrefutable proof that a conman namely Robert Busbridge committed gross and persistent acts of forgery and perjury, they refused to even investigate my allegations despite the masses of evidence I gave them. They even said I had not even given them any evidence at all. So their usual gross acts of persistent lying. They never even interviewed me despite commenting that they did not "UNDERSTAND" that evidence I gave them. What a shower!!
Then when you rightly complain to the IPCC you are then given the run round and then in the end they engage in a flurry of excuse making to paint what the Met did as whiter than white and nothing to worry about.
Now what has this got to do with the killing of Tomlinson? Very easy to explain that, as the IPCC as they do, had to "Investigate" that gross act by a member of the MET!! All of us in the country knew that this was yet another example of how out of control the Met are. They are nothing more than a bunch of thugs and crooks in uniform as are all the Police in this country. Not only thugs, but crooks in uniform, as well. The IPCC did exactly with that investigation as they did with mine. That is they backed the murderous actions of the Met up to the hilt and did not advise that the policeman should be charged and tried for it. So we all could see he needed to be brought to trial, yet the IPCC engage in yet another gross act of white washing and grovelling to the Police. WHAT A SHOWER!!
Wednesday 27 April 2011
Corrupt Police & IPO-how they aided a crook. 55.
As you will know both the Met & the Dorset Police colluded with the IPO and I have been trying to get all three corrupt entities to cough up the documents that passed between them. The Met admitted that they had talked to the IPO about me and my asking them to investigate Busbridge for perjury and Forgery and I merely asked to see whatever letters or emails passed between them. Obviously I was refused by both of the corrupt bastards.
Now due to our wonderful politicians, they devised TWO Acts that this can be done instead of one. These are called the Freedom of information Act and the other is the Data Protection Act. Because one cannot get sight of any document how are you supposed to be able to determine which act any document may come under? The FOIA concerns I think general documents that are not solely about you and the DPA is about documents solely about you.
I had asked the Met in the first instance under the FOIA and they refused to cough up. So then I had to ask under the DPA and today they again refused. SO WHAT THIS MEANS FOLKS IS THAT THE MET ARE SAYING THEY HAVE NO DOCUMENTS WHATSOEVER WHATEVER THE ACT, OR THEY ARE SAYING THAT THEY HAVE BUT WILL NOT RELEASE THEM. Either way it shows they ARE COMPLETELY CORRUPT, AS WE ALL KNOW THAT THE REASON THEY REFUSE AND THAT IS BECAUSE THEY KNOW WHATEVER IS ON THEM WILL INCRIMINATE THE BASTARDS!!
So it now remains to be seen just how effective the ICO is and I will bet you they are as bad. I will go out and get pissed if ANY GOVERNMENT BODY ACTS COMPLETELY HONESTLY OVER THIS WHOLE AFFAIR......AND IT MUST BE IN THE SIXTIES THE LAST TIME I WAS PISSED!!
Now due to our wonderful politicians, they devised TWO Acts that this can be done instead of one. These are called the Freedom of information Act and the other is the Data Protection Act. Because one cannot get sight of any document how are you supposed to be able to determine which act any document may come under? The FOIA concerns I think general documents that are not solely about you and the DPA is about documents solely about you.
I had asked the Met in the first instance under the FOIA and they refused to cough up. So then I had to ask under the DPA and today they again refused. SO WHAT THIS MEANS FOLKS IS THAT THE MET ARE SAYING THEY HAVE NO DOCUMENTS WHATSOEVER WHATEVER THE ACT, OR THEY ARE SAYING THAT THEY HAVE BUT WILL NOT RELEASE THEM. Either way it shows they ARE COMPLETELY CORRUPT, AS WE ALL KNOW THAT THE REASON THEY REFUSE AND THAT IS BECAUSE THEY KNOW WHATEVER IS ON THEM WILL INCRIMINATE THE BASTARDS!!
So it now remains to be seen just how effective the ICO is and I will bet you they are as bad. I will go out and get pissed if ANY GOVERNMENT BODY ACTS COMPLETELY HONESTLY OVER THIS WHOLE AFFAIR......AND IT MUST BE IN THE SIXTIES THE LAST TIME I WAS PISSED!!
Monday 25 April 2011
Corrupt Police & lPO-How they aided a crook. 54.
Following my complete and unsuccessful attempt to get the corrupt Met Police to charge Busbridge with Perjury & Forgery, after they colluded with the IPO, not to investigate. Probably on the grounds that to do so would bring it out into the open that the IPO have deliberately and cynically made sure Busbridge won most times over the past 10 years. So I have now been forced to go directly to the Attorney General as you can do (I have been told) with the same dossier that I gave to the Met, in order that he should set in motion an investigation. I want to see if he, one of the countries top justice people, is as corrupt as all the rest of them.
It is interesting to note that Sgt Walters of Camden Police Station who was the corrupt officer who did all this colluding with the IPO, said in his report when he refused to investigate, that I had not given him any evidence to back up my allegations of Perjury & Forgery. He also told the investigating officer of the IPCC the same pack of lies because he also used this as an excuse to exonerate Walters and rubbish me. Of course my dossier did include all the documentary evidence needed to charge Busbridge with these criminal acts.
Now hark back in this story to 1999 when Busbridge went to the Met alleging that I had forged our agency agreement document. He provided absolutely no evidence at all save him saying 'He thought it had been forged' The Met then investigated with the speed of a cavalry charge and I was charged in quick order; Isn't this so hypocritical and typical of the Met???
It is interesting to note that Sgt Walters of Camden Police Station who was the corrupt officer who did all this colluding with the IPO, said in his report when he refused to investigate, that I had not given him any evidence to back up my allegations of Perjury & Forgery. He also told the investigating officer of the IPCC the same pack of lies because he also used this as an excuse to exonerate Walters and rubbish me. Of course my dossier did include all the documentary evidence needed to charge Busbridge with these criminal acts.
Now hark back in this story to 1999 when Busbridge went to the Met alleging that I had forged our agency agreement document. He provided absolutely no evidence at all save him saying 'He thought it had been forged' The Met then investigated with the speed of a cavalry charge and I was charged in quick order; Isn't this so hypocritical and typical of the Met???
Friday 18 March 2011
Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 53.
A lot has happened since my last post and none of it positive for my quest to get JUSTICE against this conman. All concern corrupt actions or should I say non actions by various government bodies and people. These are The Dorset Police, The Met Police, The Independent Police Complaints Commissioner, the Attorney General, My MP Chris Chope, & Kenneth Clarke the Minister for Justice.
I will deal with each of these below. Firstly with:-
The Dorset Police.....You may remember I had been waiting for their response since September 2010 to my complaint to their Complaints procedures that they had refused to investigate my request to investigate the forgery and perjury of Busbridge. I had also put in requests under the Freedom of Information Act and the Data Protection Act. This was to give me all information that had passed between them and the IPO and the Met concerning Busbridges perjury etc. They are supposed to act in definite ways under these Acts and of course they ignored all the rules and so I never got a scrap of info despite my knowing there is info there as I have an email to them from the IPO which clearly states there is, which I am sure I have mentioned in recent past posts.
I eventually got in late Feb their response which was EXACTLY as I expected. You can read our wonderful Police like a book. (One on corruption that is)The copper Brimicombe lowered himself to the floor by engaging in a litany of lying about our meeting when he tried to intimidate me and put forward spurious lies as to how there had never been perjury committed (He studiously ignored the forgery) and saying that perjury could only be reported by either the Judges of the hearings or the Attorney General. When I pointed out that his Force saw no difficulty in charging me with perjury and forgery on the lies of a conman (Busbridge) without recourse to saying to Busbridge that it was the hearing officer or the Attorney General that had to do him. He had no answer to that one but it made no difference to them actually investigating my complaint.
All that is posted in previous posts and now in this knock back letter, Brimicombe shows what he really is by going into an orgy of lying himself by saying I had shouted and sworn at this hearing and had behaved in an overbearing manner. Of course I am not that stupid to do so at any meeting where I am trying to get the Police to act on my behalf. Of course his cohort copper who was present as the POLICE WITNESS backed him up by also lying. This is the what we the Public have to put up these days with our corrupt, lying scumbags that dare to call themselves Police! The reply by them will in due course be attached in full to this blog as will a number of documents that so far I have not had time to put them on.
They ignored my complaints about not giving me the info under the various Acts but that has now gone to the Information Commissioner who deals with complaints under those Acts.
THE MET POLICE.Here their story which I have already recounted but I did complain about them to the IPCC about their refusal to also investigate perjury and forgery by Busbridge. They also refused to show me all their documents etc that went between them and the IPO. You see both Police Forces and the IPO do not want me to see any of these documents because they know they contain valuable information and facts that will show them up for what they are:- Conniving, corrupt and lying bastards who have all conspired to deny me Justice for reasons that they refuse to divulge and the emails will have given me the answer as to why they refuse the deal with BUSBRIDGE AND HIS CRIMES!
THE IPCC. YET ANOTHER USELESS GOVERNMENT CON ON THE BRITISH PUBLIC. My complaints to them about the MET which I did first was as I fully expected.....a typical whitewash so as to protect the Police. How many times have you read that the Police or a particular Policeman has actually been severely done for breaking the law???? They even get away with blatant murder,so they got away with this...easy peasy! No sweat, and they know I am impotent and so they can get away with anything. So my complaint to the IPCC got nowhere as usual, so I never bothered to report the Dorset Police as that too would have been a total waste of time.
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL MR DOMINIC GRIEVE MP. I sent him a letter late last year asking him if what the Police had said as to how perjury can get dealt with, was correct. After many months of waiting got a reply, not from Grieve but one of his pen pushers. I was told I was asking for legal advice. It completely goes over his head that what I am really asking for, is for him to say that what the police had claimed was correct or incorrect and for him to explain what his duties were over the reporting of perjury. Not asking for legal advice at all.
I replied in my usual forthright way to Grieve again and saying I was not accepting that vacuous reply and wanted an answer from him and not one of his minions. Months later.... still no reply.
THE IPO... I asked them in the same way, to release copies of all emails, letters or records of telephone conversations between them and the Met and Dorset Police Forces. They refused to release all of them but did feed me with a few snippets, a couple of them dating right back to 2004, so did not deal with the important up to date documents. They did show me that even in 2004 they had very negative attitudes to me personally and this was way before I had really started on them. So God knows what they think of me know?
THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONERS OFFICE.I have reported both the Met and the Dorset Police and the IPO for refusing to divulge information I knew they held on me and the goings on between them and the two Police forces. I at this moment am waiting to see what transpires, but as my faith in ALL GOVERNMENT BODIES IS SHATTERED I DO NOT EXPECT THEM TO BE INDEPENDENT AND TO FORCE THESE BODIES TO COUGH UP THE DOCUMENTS. All these so called independent bodies that are supposed to help the Public get answers and Justice against recalcitrant, and corrupt Government bodies, are a sham. They have no teeth at all, not one of them, including the IPCC, so the Police are really a law unto themselves. You simply cannot get anyone to bring them in to line.
KENNETH CLARKE MP. SO CALLED JUSTICE MINISTER. I cannot stand this oaf and never have done and that goes back to the last Conservative Government. He is the epitomeof the fat, oafish, upper class Conservative twits found in numbers in this government. His reply to my first letter was not done by him but the very department that I had complained about. So it was a tainted whitewash. I wrote back in last September to lambast it and I tore it to shreds and I emphasised that I wanted HIM to deal with it and answer it. To date many months down the line and still no answer and I know I will not get one as he hasn't the guts to deal with it as he knows I am right.( This was my reporting that a Judge Hobbs QC was corrupt and the facts surrounding an appeal he heard. This asked for by Busbridge as reported by me in past posts).
THE PARLIAMENTARY OMBUDSMAN. I had reported to them the fact that the IPO had denied me Justice by having several hearings where they denied me this justice and a "Fair Trial" as required by the Human Rights Act. They had also denied me Justice by conniving with the Dorset & Met Police to again allow them to stop investigating the Forgery and Perjury as reported to them by me. Also to denying me the documents I had asked them to provide me. They sent me a long winded whitewash which again denied me the justice I seek.
At the moment I an awaiting what the ICO have to say about the FOIA and the DPA Acts being ignored, but I am not holding my breath. I also await my last complaint to the Parliamentary Ombudsman about their refusal to divulge all the letters etc as supplied to them by the IPO, when I made my complaint to them about the IPO.
Finally MY LOCAL MP, ONE CHRIS CHOPE. MP's are no better than any of their government departments....all utterly useless and self serving etc etc. I have been asking him for a couple of years now to help me over the myriad of departments I have vainly tried to get justice through. He being an ex lawyer (Aren't they all ex lawyers, these assholes in govenment and probably all were useless lawyers and that's why they went into the soft option of being an MP)should have been able to do this easily. Of course all he wants is an easy life with no effort plus all his perks and expenses etc. He's not interested in his constituents.
He has steadfastly refused to help me and he does this by ignoring all my letters asking for help. I will be reporting him to the Chief Whip who is supposed to deal with such complaints, but again I am not holding my breath.
LASTLY, I have now finished my book on the whole of this story which is called "JUSTICE DENIED" A preliminary copy of my early manuscript of this has been on this blog, but that has been edited several times and added to. SO very soon the finished article will be replacing it and the book will shortly be published. It will go out to every Law Professor in the country AND every Minister who I think is remotely responsible for every department I have complained about. I will include the Prime Minister as well.
It will also go to many people in the media as an example of how people in this country are shat upon by government and that this story is but one of thousands of examples, many of which never see the light of day. How criminals in this country are pandered to whilst law abiding citizens like me are treated with contempt and like criminals ourselves.
It will also go to many people that I think would be interested and who are in positions of power and influence, so could help to strike a blow for all of us who get regularly shat on by the Establishment, whom we pay to keep in existence.
Wednesday 12 January 2011
Corrupt Police & IPO-How they aided a crook. 52.
Because our corrupt Police Forces of Dorset and The Met refuse to investigate the criminal actions of Busbridge, I have been forced to report the Met to the Independent Police Complaints Commission. They don't have a good reputation as being independent so we will see how they fare. I cannot yet report the Dorset shower as they have since September 1st, deliberately gone slow on officially turning down my official complaint about their non actions. Well this is typical of the Police these days who in my book are nothing more than a rabble in uniform. By acting as they are doing they make themselves no better than the crims they are supposed to be protecting us from. This by a rabble of crims themselves, only they are in uniform. I mean it takes a crim to recognise one as the saying goes.....how true.
When I finally get a knock back from the Dorset Rabble Yeomanry, I will then send in my report on them to the IPCC, no doubt for yet another fruitless exercise in futility.
Dorset Police are also behaving in a disgusting way by refusing to divulge the emails and letters that went between them and the equally corrupt IPO. What have they to hide I ask????????? They haven't even kept to the rules by issuing me with an official refusal AND IN FACT THEY ARE JUST IGNORING MY REQUEST AND EVEN THEIR DEPUTY CHIEF CONSTABLE REFUSES TO ANSWER MY LETTER ASKING WHY HIS FORCE IS BEHAVING THIS WAY. Then of course the Met have done the very same, but at least they issued the refusal and that lets you go on to lay a complaint to yet another official so called watchdog, who will no doubt turn out to be a toothless as all the other dozens of these parasites that exist in this wonderful country of ours.
I tell you I may as well be living in RUSSIA for all the corruption and useless incompetents we have all around our government bodies/institutions and our corrupt politicians.
Don't forget Ken Clarke...He the 'Criminals Friend' still hasn't replied to my complaint about that the Corrupt Judge Hobbs who hasn't been dealt with. This is how those in Politics behave, when you get them into a corner and they know they are in the wrong and they just don't want to act for to do so will be an admission of their uselessness......THEY IGNORE YOU!!!!!!
Then there is yet another corrupt politician, none other than the ATTORNEY GENERAL, DOMINIC GRIEVE. MP, who refuses to say whether the IPO were right to say that perjury cannot be investigated by anyone unless the A/Gen gives his OK. Again he is in a corner so what does he do? He says I am asking for legal advice which he doesn't do, when all I am doing is asking him to verify if another government is lying or is telling the truth and what is his job in relation to the reporting of perjury?????
I have yet to see how the INFORMATION COMMISSIONER does re my complaints at not getting the documents I have requested from the IPO, the PARLIAMENTARY OMBUDSMAN (who will no doubt invent excuses not to release what documents they got from the IPO)and lastly also from the DORSET POLICE and the MET POLICE.
QUITE FRANKLY I DON'T EXPECT ANY OF THESE GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS TO BEHAVE PROPERLY AND ABOVE SUSPICION, BUT I AM DOING ALL THIS PUSHING SO I CAN SHOW YOU ALL JUST HOW CORRUPT OUR SYSTEM IS WHEN THE ESTABLISHMENT DECIDE THEY WILL NEVER ALLOW YOU JUSTICE. THEY ALL BAND TOGETHER AND YOU CAN KISS JUSTICE ON IT'S ASS.
When I finally get a knock back from the Dorset Rabble Yeomanry, I will then send in my report on them to the IPCC, no doubt for yet another fruitless exercise in futility.
Dorset Police are also behaving in a disgusting way by refusing to divulge the emails and letters that went between them and the equally corrupt IPO. What have they to hide I ask????????? They haven't even kept to the rules by issuing me with an official refusal AND IN FACT THEY ARE JUST IGNORING MY REQUEST AND EVEN THEIR DEPUTY CHIEF CONSTABLE REFUSES TO ANSWER MY LETTER ASKING WHY HIS FORCE IS BEHAVING THIS WAY. Then of course the Met have done the very same, but at least they issued the refusal and that lets you go on to lay a complaint to yet another official so called watchdog, who will no doubt turn out to be a toothless as all the other dozens of these parasites that exist in this wonderful country of ours.
I tell you I may as well be living in RUSSIA for all the corruption and useless incompetents we have all around our government bodies/institutions and our corrupt politicians.
Don't forget Ken Clarke...He the 'Criminals Friend' still hasn't replied to my complaint about that the Corrupt Judge Hobbs who hasn't been dealt with. This is how those in Politics behave, when you get them into a corner and they know they are in the wrong and they just don't want to act for to do so will be an admission of their uselessness......THEY IGNORE YOU!!!!!!
Then there is yet another corrupt politician, none other than the ATTORNEY GENERAL, DOMINIC GRIEVE. MP, who refuses to say whether the IPO were right to say that perjury cannot be investigated by anyone unless the A/Gen gives his OK. Again he is in a corner so what does he do? He says I am asking for legal advice which he doesn't do, when all I am doing is asking him to verify if another government is lying or is telling the truth and what is his job in relation to the reporting of perjury?????
I have yet to see how the INFORMATION COMMISSIONER does re my complaints at not getting the documents I have requested from the IPO, the PARLIAMENTARY OMBUDSMAN (who will no doubt invent excuses not to release what documents they got from the IPO)and lastly also from the DORSET POLICE and the MET POLICE.
QUITE FRANKLY I DON'T EXPECT ANY OF THESE GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS TO BEHAVE PROPERLY AND ABOVE SUSPICION, BUT I AM DOING ALL THIS PUSHING SO I CAN SHOW YOU ALL JUST HOW CORRUPT OUR SYSTEM IS WHEN THE ESTABLISHMENT DECIDE THEY WILL NEVER ALLOW YOU JUSTICE. THEY ALL BAND TOGETHER AND YOU CAN KISS JUSTICE ON IT'S ASS.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)